﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Australian Competition Law Archive</title>
    <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
    <description>Archive news feed</description>
    <language>en-au</language>
    <copyright>(c) Julie Clarke</copyright>
    <managingEditor>Julie Clarke</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>Julie Clarke</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:13:32 +1100</lastBuildDate>
    
 
	      <item>
      <title>Criminal charges expected to be laid against ANZ</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:39:00 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#anzcriminal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced that 'that criminal  cartel charges are expected to be laid by the Commonwealth Director of Public  Prosecutions (CDPP) against ANZ, ANZ Group Treasurer Rick Moscati, two other  companies and a number of other individuals.'&nbsp; </p>
              <p>The expected charges follow an investigation by the ACCC. They will involve alleged cartel arrangements relating to trading in ANZ shares.</p>
              <p>The ACCC's media release follows an announcement by the ANZ to ASX in which it states that it was advised yesterday that the CDPP intends to commence cartel proceedings against the bank.</p>
              <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/correction-criminal-cartel-charges-to-be-laid-against-anz-0" title="ACCC media release Pfizer" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. </p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.asx.com.au/asx/share-price-research/company/ANZ" target="_blank">ANZ announcement to ASX</a>.</p>
              <p>See also <a href="https://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/financial-services/anz-hit-with-criminal-cartel-charges-20180531-h10tpv" target="_blank">James Eyers, 'ANZ hit with criminal cartel charges' (AFR, 1 June 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/anz-facing-legal-action-over-alleged-cartel-conduct/news-story/905892d53ba86bb7ce1a5fea183c7264" target="_blank">'ANZ facing legal action over alleged cartel conduct' (The Australian, 1 June 2018)</a> and <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/anz-bank-facing-cartel-prosecution-20180601-p4zisr.html" target="_blank">Clancy Yeates, 'ANZ Bank facing cartel prosecution' (SMH, 1 June 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC loses Pfizer appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 09:38:03 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#pfizerappeal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>After almost two and a half years, the Full Court of the Federal Court has dismissed the ACCC's appeal against the trial judgment in relation to Pfizer. The ACCC had alleged misuse of market power and exclusive dealing. The ACCC is 'carefully considering the judgment'.</p>
			   <p>The ACCC originally instituted proceedings in February 2014 and decided on 25 February 2015. The appeal was heard in November 2015.</p>
			   <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-unsuccessful-in-appeal-against-pfizer" title="ACCC media release Pfizer" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
			   <p>The reasons for decision (approx 200 pages) are <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2018/2018fcafc0078" target="_blank">now available here</a>.</p>
			   <p>View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2015pfizer.html" title="Pfizer">my case page</a>. </p>
			   <p>See also <a href="https://lawyerly.com.au/accc-loses-appeal-pfizer-misuse-market-power-case/" target="_blank">Christine Caulfield, 'ACCC loses appeal in Pfizer misuse of market power case' (Lawyerly, 25 May 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/accc-loses-competition-law-case-against-pfizer-again-20180525-h10jno" target="_blank">Misa Han, 'ACCC loses competition law case against Pfizer again' (AFR, 25 May 2018)</a> and <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/accc-loses-appeal-against-pfizer-over-lipitor-sales-20180525-p4zhkc.html" target="_blank">Reuters, 'ACCC loses appeal against Pfizer over Lipitor sales' (SMH, 25 May 2018).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises Tyre Stewardship Scheme</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 09:37:39 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#tyreschemefinal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has authorised Tyre Stewardship Australia to continue its Tyre Stewardship Scheme. The scheme is 'designed to increase the recycling of tyres and use of products  made from recycled tyres'.</p>
			   <p>The authorisation follows a draft determination proposing to re-authorise in April this year.</p>
			   <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-re-authorises-tyre-stewardship-scheme" title="ACCC media release tyres" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
			   <p>View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205063/fromItemId/750991" title="Transurban Merger R" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues statement of issues in relation to proposed Transurban/WestConnex deal</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 09:37:00 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#transurbansoi</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC today issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER18+4542.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1205354&amp;trimFileName=MER18+4542.pdf" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> setting our preliminary concerns about Sydney Transport Partners' (consortium led by Transurban) proposed acquisition of a majority interest in the WestConnex project.</p>
			   <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concerned-about-transurbans-interest-in-westconnex" title="ACCC media release Transurban" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
			   <p>View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205063/fromItemId/750991" title="Transurban Merger R" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>
			   <p>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/accc-raises-red-flag-on-transurbans-bid-for-westconnex-20180517-h1060j" target="_blank">Mark Ludlow, 'ACCC raises red flag on Transurban's bid for WestConnex' (AFR, 17 May 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/accc-fears-transurban-will-gain-too-much-advantage-from-westconnex-buy-20180517-p4zfsn.html" target="_blank">Matt O'Sullivan, 'ACCC fears Transurban will gain too much advantage from WestConnex buy' (SMH, 17 May 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/accc-draws-line-in-the-road-for-transurban-20180517-h106ru" target="_blank"> Chanticleer, 'ACCC draws line in the road for Transburban' (AFR, 17 May 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-flags-competition-concerns-over-transurban-taking-stake-in-westconnex/news-story/e62af95e32b9de004d5e34da89656f58" target="_blank">Samantha Bailey, 'ACCC flags competition concerns over Transurban taking stake in WestConnex' (17 May 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Highest cartel penalty in Australian history imposed on Yazaki: $46m</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 09:36:08 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#yazakipenalty2</link>
      <description><![CDATA[	   <p> The Full Federal Court today handed down its decision in the ACCC's appeal against <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2015yazaki.html">Yazaki's $9.5m penalty</a> for cartel conduct. The Full Federal Court allowed the appeal in part and increased penalties to $46m, the highest ever imposed in Australia for cartel conduct (or indeed for any contravention of the Competition and Consumer Act).</p>
			   <p>Part of the explanation for the increased penalty was that the Full Court found that the maximum penalty for each contravention was $18m, not $10m, based on 'the proper construction of s 76(5)' of the Act (defining annual turnover for purposes of the calculation of penalty) and because the Full Court held that the penalties should not be limited to two 'courses of conduct' but instead should be imposed on five separate contraventions.</p>
			   <p>The <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2018/2018fcafc0073" target="_blank">judgment can be found here</a>, accompanied by a summary judgment.</p>
			   <p>Plenty of media: <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/japanese-car-parts-supplier-yazaki-gets-record-fine-for-cartel-20180516-h104e8" target="_blank">Misa Han, 'Japanese car parts supplier Yazaki gets record fine for cartel' (AFR, 16 May 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/toyota-supplier-fined-46m-in-australia-s-biggest-ever-cartel-penalty-20180516-p4zfk1.html" target="_blank">Nick Toscano, ''Huge step': Australian companies on notice after massive fine' (SMH, 16 May 2018)</a>. See also <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/record-46-million-in-penalties-for-yazaki-cartel" title="ACCC Yazaki pr" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
			   <p>More details to follow on <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2015yazaki.html">my case page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases new batch of submissions to digital platforms inquiry</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 09:35:33 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#digitalplatformssub11may2</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC has published a new batch of submissions in response to the Issues Paper for the <a href="reports/2017digitalplatforms.html">Digital Platforms Inquiry</a>.</p>
			   <p>The new submissions are largely from individuals (David Nebe, Karl Goiser, Margaret Simons (<em>A/Prof, School of Media, FIlm and Journalism, Monash University</em>), Simon M, Teresa K and Tony Healy ), with a revised submission from the SBS and a submission from MediaScope also published today:</p>
			   <p>Consumer Questionnarire Responses have also been published</p>
			   <p><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/inquiries/digital-platforms-inquiry/submissions-may-2018" target="_blank">New submissions can be viewed here</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Capped prices for dental services authorised</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 09:35:10 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#dentistfinal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC has authorised HCF to set capped prices for dental services - this follows a draft authorisation in March.</p>
			   <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/hcf-authorised-to-set-capped-prices-for-dental-services" title="Dental authorisation" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conditional approval for Port of Brisbane, Carnival</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 09:34:40 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#portsfinal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC has granted conditional authorisation for an agreement between Port of Brisbane and Carnival to develop a $158m cruise terminal. This follows a draft determination in March. ACCC, Roger Featherston: </p>
			      <blockquote>
			        <p>'While we understand the important benefits a dedicated cruise ship terminal would bring to Brisbane, we have concerns that parts of the agreement between the Port of Brisbane and Carnival would limit consumer choice and entrench Carnival as the dominant cruise operator in Brisbane for 15 years. That&rsquo;s why we have approved this agreement with two conditions'</p>
		          </blockquote>
			      <p>The first condition restricts the days Carnival can book the terminal (no more than two of three 'weekend' days) and the second is that ' if the terminal is expanded in the future to provide a second berth, Carnival cannot be given first right of refusal for an agreement which would give it first choice of days at that berth.'</p>
			      <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/conditional-approval-for-port-of-brisbane-carnival" title="Carnival" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/port-of-brisbane-pty-ltd-carnival-plc" title="carnival authorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC new consumer data right</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 09:34:08 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#dataright</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC has welcomed the 'introduction of a general data right for all consumers and $20 million in the Federal Budget over the next four years to oversee its implementation', which Chairman Rod Sims labeled 'fundamental competition and consumer reform'.</p>
			   <p>The first sector designated is the banking sector, with the consumer data right coming in response to the <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/review/review-into-open-banking-in-australia/" target="_blank">Open Banking Review</a>. </p>
			   <p>The ACCC is establishing a dedicated 'Access to Data Unit' to undertake these new functions and will work closely with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, Data Standards Body and industry in relation to implementation of the consumer data right.</p>
			   <p>See ACCC <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-welcomes-consumer-data-right" target="_blank">media release (9 May)</a> and Australian Government, '<a href="https://treasury.gov.au/consumer-data-right/" target="_blank">Consumer Data Right</a>' (Treasury, 9 May 2018)</p>
			   <p>See also: <a href="https://which-50.com/new-consumer-data-right-funding-set-to-fuel-open-banking/" target="_blank">Joseph Brookes, 'New Consumer Data Right Funding Set To Fuel Open Banking' (Which-50, 10 May 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.cmo.com.au/article/640952/budget-2018-government-set-shake-up-consumer-data-rights-44-6m-investment/" target="_blank">Nadia Cameron, 'Budget 2018: Government set to shake-up consumer data rights with $44.6m investment' (CMO, 9 May 2018)</a>,<a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/banks-welcome-phased-launch-of-open-banking/news-story/cc14d51674a4cf8a6fc9f17600fe03fb" target="_blank"> Supratim Adhikari, 'Banks welcome phased launch of open banking' (The Australian, 10 May 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/budget-2018-funding-australias-data-sharing-framework/" target="_blank">Dorinne Reichert, 'Budget 2018: Funding Australia's data-sharing framework' (ZDNet, 8 May 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.innovationaus.com/2018/05/Govt-backs-open-banking-framework" target="_blank">Denham Sadler, 'Gov't backs open banking framework' (InnovationAus.com, 10 May 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/consumer-data-right-australia-2018-20171127" target="_blank">Patrick Gunning, Hannah Glass and Smriti Arora, 'Consumer Data Right to be introduced in Australia in 2018' (KWM, 17 November 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC budget boost</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 May 2018 09:33:37 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#budget</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p> The ACCC's funding for 2018-2019 is $261 million, up from $243 million for 2017-2018, incluidng increased staff levels (from 868-909). Performance targets for number of competition enforcement interventions reduced from 8 to 6 (page 86 Budget Portfolio Statement) and target of mergers finalised by pre-assessment remains at 80%.</p>
			   <p>See <a href="https://static.treasury.gov.au/uploads/sites/1/2018/05/05_Australian-Competition-and-Consumer-Commission-1.pdf" target="_blank">ACCC Budget Portfolio statement</a>.</p>
			   <p>See also <a href="https://budget.gov.au/2018-19/content/bp4/index.html" target="_blank">Budget Paper No 4 on Agency Resourceing 2018-19</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fisse on cartels</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 May 2018 09:33:10 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#FisseCartels</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p> On Saturday <a href="experts/hodgekiss-chris.html">Christopher Hodgekiss</a> hosted his annual <a href="https://www.vicbar.com.au/sites/default/files/CLC%202018_programme%2Bsessions%2Bregn%20form_0.pdf" target="_blank">Competition Law Conference</a> in Sydney, with its usual high caliber line-up.</p>
			   <p><a href="experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a> has now published his (slightly updated) paper from the conference - '<a href="https://www.brentfisse.com/images/Australian_Cartel_Law_Biopsies_050518_2.pdf" target="_blank">Australian Cartel Law: Biopsies</a>'. The extensive paper discusses the state of Australian cartel law post-Harper. Fisse claims that post-Harper 'some patients remain in the wards' and that some 'detailed treatment plans may be called for'. The paper includes discussion of the concepts of 'arrangement an understanding', the ongoing issue of 'purpose' in s 45AD, cartel exemptions and some aspects of liability and sanctions (all discussed in this paper).</p>
			   <p>The associated PowerPoint as well as many more publications by Brent can be found on his <a href="https://www.brentfisse.com/publications.html" target="_blank">website</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Seven and Nine's proposed acquisition of Network Ten's stake in TX Australia</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2018 09:31:57 +1000</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#txagreenlight2</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Seven and Nine acquiring Ten's stake in TX Australia (TXA), which provides transmission services in major capital cities.
<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, said of the decision:</p>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<p>The ACCC has carefully analysed the potential of this proposed acquisition to disrupt Ten’s access to transmission services and affect competition for television content or advertising.</p>
<p>After consulting industry players, we consider that Broadcast Australia, which currently provides transmission services to the ABC and SBS, is a viable alternative provider of transmission services for Ten. We therefore consider it unlikely that the acquisition would substantially lessen competition in the content or advertising markets.</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
<p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/seven-and-nine-cleared-to-acquire-tens-txa-shares" target=_blank>media release</a>.</p>
<p>View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205340/fromItemId/751046" target=_blank>merger register</a>.</p>
<p>For related proceedings, see <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/media-and-marketing/tv/court-rules-network-ten-sell-tx-australia-stake-for-1-20180501-h0zh28" target=_blank>Max Mason, 'Court rules Network Ten sell TX Australia stake for $1' (AFR, 1 May 2018)</a></p>
<div></div>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC publishes Digital Inquiry submissions </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2018 09:21:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#digitalplatformssub3may</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/mobile-phone-426559_banner.jpg" alt="Digital media platforms" width="595" height="187" id="digitalplatformssub3may"/>
  <p> The ACCC has now published public versions of submissions made in response to the Issues Paper released as part of the <a href="reports/2017digitalplatforms.html">Digital Platforms Inquiry</a> - 57 in total.</p>
              <p><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/inquiries/digital-platforms-inquiry/submissions-may-2018" target="_blank">Submissions can be viewed here</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to publish Digital Inquiry submissions tomorrow</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 May 2018 09:18:47 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#digitalplatformssub2may</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/mobile-phone-426559_banner.jpg" alt="Digital media platforms" width="595" height="187" id="digitalplatformssub2may"/>
   <p> The ACCC will publish submissions made in response to the Issues Paper for the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2017digitalplatforms.html">Digital Platforms Inquiry</a> tomorrow.</p>
			   <p>See, eg<a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/accc-to-reveal-submissions-into-google-and-facebook/news-story/718932922e6f9f48d0b8ba303b91ed24" target="_blank">, Darren Davidson, 'ACCC to reveal submissions into Google and Facebook' (The Australian, 2 May 2018)</a>.</p>
		    ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases final dairy report</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:18:45 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#dairyreport</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/cow-grass-3213933_1280.jpg" alt="Image of dairy cow" width="595" height="247" id="dairyreport"/>
<p> The ACCC has released the final report arising from the dairy inquiry, including recommendations for a mandatory code of conduct to address problems associated with the imbalance in bargaining power between dairy farmers and processors.</p>
          <p>ACCC Commissioner, Mick Keogh, also noted that the report also found 'no direct relationship between retail private label milk prices and farmgate prices' and that increasing supermarket pricing of private label milk would be unlikely to increase farmgate prices 'unless farmers have improved bargaining power in their negotiations with processors'.</p>
          <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-regulatory-reform-to-assist-dairy-farmers" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
          <p>View  <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/dairy-inquiry/final-report" target="_blank">Final Report on dairy inquiry home page</a>.</p>
          <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/dairy-inquiry-farmers-guide-to-the-final-report" target="_blank">'Dairy inquiry - farmers' guide to the final report'</a>.</p>
   ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise Tyre Stewardship Scheme</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:18:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#tyrescheme2</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/mature-3304531_1280-tyre.jpg" alt="Image of tyres" width="595" height="212" id="tyrescheme2"/>
<p> The ACCC has announced that it is 'proposing to grant authorisation for Tyre Stewardship Australia (TSA) to continue its revised Tyre Stewardship Scheme for a further six years.'</p>
   <p>The scheme aims to increase the recycling of tyres and the use of recycled tyre products. </p>
   <p>ACCC Commissioner, Roger Featherston, noted that the ACCC believes:</p>
   <blockquote>
     <p>... the scheme is likely to result in a public benefit by reducing the number of tyres disposed of in landfill, illegally dumped, or exported overseas to be burned unsustainably for fuel ...'</p>
   </blockquote>
   <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-tyre-stewardship-scheme" title="MR tyres" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
   <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/tyre-stewardship-australia-limited" title="Authorisation tyres" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose proposed acquisition of Tox by Cleanaway</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:17:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#waste</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/vehicle-3322111_1280-white.jpg" alt="Rubbish truck" width="595" height="298" id="waste"/>   <p>The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Tox Free Solutions Ltd by Cleanaway Waste Management Limited. While noting it was a 'complex matter' with a mix of views on competitive impact, the ACCC concluded that the merger was unlikely to <em>substantially </em>lessen competition.</p>
   <p>According to ACCC Commissioner Roger Featherston:</p>
   <blockquote>
     <p>Although there may be a lessening of competition in some waste streams, such as hazardous waste collection and processing, and used lubricating oil collection, we considered that, in this case, the proposed acquisition is unlikely to meet the threshold of a substantial lessening of competition ...</p>
     <p>We concluded that the threat of customers switching to competitors would constrain Cleanaway from increasing prices or decreasing service levels to a significant extent in any waste stream or geographic area. </p>
   </blockquote>
   <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-waste-industry-acquisition" title="MR waste" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
   <p>View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205330/fromItemId/751046" title="Merger register waste" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Platforms Inquiry submissions filtering out</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:11:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#digitalsubs</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/banner-982162_1280.jpg" alt="Tech images" width="595" height="184" id="digitalsub"/></p>
<p> There's plenty of media today relating to the ACCC's Digital Platforms Inquiry following the release of a number of submissions (not yet on the ACCC Inquiry page). </p>
          <p>Public submissions include:</p>
          <blockquote>
            <p><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5cecmyud0duN2lMbXFOdzhpMmNWb2RKQVd4dHFxcHh2UjNn/view" target="_blank"><strong>Google</strong></a> <br />
              (related blog: <a href="https://australia.googleblog.com/2018/04/consumers-will-determine-future-of-news.html" target="_blank">Hason Pellegrino, 'Consumers will determine the future of news' (23 April 2018)</a>)</p>
            <p><a href="http://www.freetv.com.au/Media/Submissions/2018_014_Free_TV_Submission_Digital_Platforms_Inquiry.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>Free TV</strong></a> <br />
              (related <a href="http://www.freetv.com.au/content_common/pg-free-tv-calls-for-accc-oversight-of-facebook-and-google.seo" target="_blank">media release: 'Free TV calls for ACCC oversight of Facebook and Google (20 April 2018)</a>)</p>
            <p><a href="https://www.meaa.org/mediaroom/meaa-submission-to-the-accc-inquiry-into-digital-platforms/" target="_blank"><strong>MEAA </strong>(</a>Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance) <br />
              (related media release: <a href="https://www.meaa.org/mediaroom/meaa-submission-to-the-accc-inquiry-into-digital-platforms/" target="_blank">MEAA submission to the ACCC inquiry into digital platforms (10 April 2018)</a>)</p>
          </blockquote>
          <p>No doubt there are more I've missed; I will add links to submissions as I find them on my <a href="reports/2017digitalplatforms.html">Digital Platforms Inquiry page</a>.</p>
          <p>For media see, for example: </p>
          <blockquote>
            <p><a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/google-defends-role-in-media-amid-accc-probe-20180423-p4zb47.html" target="_blank">Jennifer Duke and John McDuling, 'Google defends role in media amid ACCC probe' (SMH, 23 April 2018)</a></p>
            <p><a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/seven-takes-battle-to-tech-giants/news-story/6d47f6d67fb229ba99189ab25f8cb2a5" target="_blank">Darren Davidson, 'Seven takes battle to tech giants' (The Australian, 23 April 2018)</a></p>
            <p><a href="http://www.adnews.com.au/news/tv-industry-calls-for-mandatory-third-party-measurement-of-facebook-and-google" target="_blank">Arvind Hickman, 'TV industry calls for mandatory third-party measurement of Facebook and Google' (AdNews, 23 April 2018)</a></p>
            <p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/23/google-tells-australian-regulator-it-is-not-contributing-to-the-death-of-journalism" target="_blank">Amanda Meade, 'Google tells Australian regulator it is not contributing to 'the death of journalism'' (The Guardian, 23 April 2018)</a></p>
            <p><a href="https://mumbrella.com.au/facebook-and-freetv-australia-draw-their-lines-ahead-of-accc-digital-platforms-inquiry-launch-512717" target="_blank">Paul Wallbank, 'Facebook and FreeTV Australia draw battle lines over ACCC digital platforms inquiry' (Mumbrella, 23 April 2018)</a></p>
            <p><a href="http://www.afr.com/business/facebook-parries-ad-market-dominance-claims-20180422-h0z30l" target="_blank">Tony Boyd, 'Facebook parries ad market &quot;dominance&quot; claims' (AFR, 22 April 2018)</a></p>
            <p><a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/the-disconnect-beneath-facebook-s-month-from-hell-20180421-p4zayp.html" target="_blank">John McDuling, 'The disconnect beneath Facebook's month from hell' (SHM, 22 April 2018)</a></p>
            <p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/apr/21/facebook-and-google-must-be-held-to-account-tv-networks-say" target="_blank">Amanda Meade, 'Facebook and Google must be held to account, TV networks say' (The Guardian, 21 April 2018)</a></p>
          </blockquote>
        ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on penalties</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:14:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#simspenalties</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/success-1093891_640wide.jpg" alt="Increase penalties target" width="595" height="265" id="simspenalties"/></p>  <p> ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, is talking penalties again in the context of investigating competition in the financial system, arguing for penalties in hundreds of millions of dollars.</p>
          <p>See <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/banking-royal-commission/accc-plan-for-fines-worth-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/news-story/151b1fddcc44de49d87cb3dc7600f91f" target="_blank">Richard Gluyas, 'ACCC plan for fines worth hundreds of millions of dollars' (The Australian, 23 April 2018)</a>.</p>
          <p>See also <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/tougher-penalties-for-banks-accc/9686662" target="_blank">'Australia needs tougher penalties for banks, financial institutions, ACCC says' (RN Breakfast, ABC, 23 April 2018) (includes audio download)</a> and <a href="https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/04/23/08/27/accc-boss-backs-massive-fines-for-banks" target="_blank">AAP, 'ACCC boss backs massive fines for banks' (9 News, 23 April 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New ACCC Deputy Chair and commissioner reappointments</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:13:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#commissioners</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/experts/appointmnets2018.jpg" width="595" height="111" alt=""/></p>
<p> Treasurer Scott Morrison has announced the appointment of Mick Keogh OAM as Deputy Chair of the ACCC for a five year period beginning at the end of May. Commissioner Keogh, who was appointed the ACCC's Agriculture Commissioner in 2016, will oversee the ACCC's small business work in addition to agricultural work. </p>
   <p>Cristina Cifuentes and Sarah Court have been re-appointed for a further five years. </p>
   <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-welcomes-new-deputy-chair-and-commissioner-reappointments" title="Commissioners" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a> and ACCC details of <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/accc-chair-commissioners" target="_blank">Chair &amp; Commissioners</a>.</p>
   <p>See <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/038-2018/" title="Morrison MR" target="_blank">Scott Morrison press release announcing appointments</a>. </p>
   <p style="font-size: 70%">Images (c) Commonwealth of Australia. Reproduced pursuant to CC BY 3.0 AU licence</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Zodiac/Fluidra deal</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:12:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#zodiac</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/life-saver-2407304_1280.jpg" alt="Lifesaver in pool" width="595" height="236" /></p>
  <p> The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed merger of Piscine Luxembourg Holdings (Zodiac) and Fluidra SA, both global companies supplying residential swimming pool equipment.</p>
   <p>The ACCC found that, although the deal combines would give the combined company significant market share in relation to some products in Australia, remaining competitors would provide sufficient post-merger competitive constraint. </p>
   <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-won%E2%80%99t-oppose-zodiac-and-fluidra-deal" title="Zodiac media" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
   <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205306/fromItemId/751046" title="Zodia MR" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>
   <p>See <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrYT59osnMk" target="_blank">Fluidra + Zodiac's 2017 You Tube announcement of merger</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New podcast on civil penalties for cartel conduct in Australia</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:08:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#podcastoecd</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="images/pixabay/microphone-2316268_1280.jpg" alt="Microphone" width="595" height="200" />
A new podcast has been published featuring <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Prof Caron Beaton-Wells</a> (Director, Competition Law and Economics Network, Melbourne Law School) and authors of the recent <a href="http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/pecuniary-penalties-competition-law-infringements-australia-2018.htm" target="_blank">OECD Report on Pecuniary Penalties for Competition Law Infringements in Australia</a>, Sean Ennis and Pedro Caro de Sousa. The podcast includes discussion of the importance of pecuniary penalties for cartel conduct and consideration of how Australia's penalty levels and processes compare with other comparable OECD jurisdictions (not well ...).  The podcast runs for just under 30 minutes.<br />
          </p>
          <iframe width="100%" height="166" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/425487999&amp;color=ff5500"></iframe>
            <p>&nbsp;</p>
            <p>View embedded podcast or view <strong><a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/news/MLS/civil-penalties-for-cartel-conduct-an-oecd-review-of-the-australian-regime" target="_blank">podcast page</a></strong> which includes a description of the podcast and links to related material.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another shipping company pleads guilty to criminal cartel conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:07:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#klineguilty</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
 <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/shipping-containers-1096829_1280.jpg" alt="Cargo" width="595" height="193"/>Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K-line), a Japan-based shipping company, today entered a guilty plea in relation to criminal cartel conduct.</p>
   <p>This is the second guilty plea in relation to criminal cartel conduct, with Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK) pleading guilty in 2016 and receiving a $25m fine in 2017. </p>
   <p>A sentencing hearing is scheduled for 15-16 November.</p>
   <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/second-shipping-company-pleads-guilty-to-criminal-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
   <p><a href="cases/2018kline.html">See my case page for further details</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Synchronised swimming versus competition in banking</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:06:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#swimming</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/wikipedia/W-Synchronized_swimming_-_Russian_team.jpg" alt="Data cable" width="595" height="286" id="swimming"/><br />
              Image source: By Jesus de Blas (Russia) [<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0" target="_blank">CC BY-SA 2.0</a>], via <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ASynchronized_swimming_-_Russian_team.jpg" target="_blank">Wikimedia Commons</a><p>Someone's having fun with metaphors at the ACCC. In a speech to the AFR Banking and Weath Summit today titled 'Synchronised swimming versus competition in banking', ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims,	spoke	about the findings of the ACCC's interim report relating to the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/inquiries/residential-mortgage-products-price-inquiry" target="_blank">Residential Mortgage Price Inquiry</a> and data as a driver of competition and stability in the abnking sector.</p>
   <p>See<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/synchronised-swimming-versus-competition-in-banking" target="_blank"> Sims, 'Synchronised swimming versus competition in banking' (Speech to AFR Banking and Wealth Summit, 5 April 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases final report on communications market</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:05:45 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#finalcomreport</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/it-838379_1280.jpg" alt="Data cable" width="595" height="229"/>The ACCC has published the final report of its communications sector market study. </p>
   <p>The report includes 28 recommentations and actions relating to competition and consumer issues.   </p>
   <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-finalises-report-on-communications-market" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
   <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/market-studies/communications-sector-market-study/final-report" target="_blank">report page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flight Centre ordered to pay $12.5m in penalties for attempted price fixing</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:05:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#flightcentrepenalty</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/wing-221526_1280.jpg" alt="Wing of aeroplane" width="595" height="198"/>The Full Federal Court has ordered Flight Centre to pay penalties of $12.5 m for attempting to induce international airlines to enter price fixing agreements. </p>
   <p>When the matter first went to trial a penalty of $11m was imposed. The matter was appealed on issues of liability and penalty. The liability issue was appealed through the the High Court which delivered judgment in favour of the ACCC in December 2016. In May 2017 the Full Federal Court heard the penalty appeal and cross appeal. Almost a year later the penalty order was handed down.</p>
   <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/flight-centre-ordered-to-pay-125-million-in-penalties" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
   <p>See <a href="cases/2013flightcentre.html">case page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC gives green light to Saputo's proposed acquisition of Murray Goulburn</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:03:47 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#saputogreenlight</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/cow-grass-3213933_1280.jpg" alt="Cow relaxing" width="595" height="247"/>The ACCC will not
     oppose Saputo's proposed acquisition of Murray Goulburn's assets 'after accepting a court enforcemable undertaking from Saputo to divest Murray Goulburn's Koroit plant'.</p>
   <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-approves-saputo-murray-goulburn-acquisition-after-undertaking" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
   <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205274/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">Saputo-MG merger register</a>.</p>
   <p>See also <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-says-saputo-promise-to-sell-koroit-plant-clears-murray-goulburn-takeover/news-story/a3ca4e3e177f3653ff7c084b8a095f8d" target="_blank">Samantha Bailey, 'ACCC says Saputo promise to sell Koroit plant clears Murray Goulburn takeover' (The Australian, 4 April 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-04-04/accc-paves-way-for-murray-goulburn-sale-to-saputo/9617182" target="_blank">Warwick Long, 'ACCC approves Murray Goulburn sale to Saputo minus the Koroit factory' (ABC, 4 April 2018)</a> and <a href="http://adf.farmonline.com.au/news/magazine/industry-news/general/accc-wont-block-saputo-but-koroit-must-go/2756978.aspx" target="_blank">'ACCC won't block Saputo, but Koroit must go' (The Australian Dairyfarmer, 4 April 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Studying competition law online</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#online</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/singapore-2064905_1280.jpg" alt="computer screens - online learning" width="680" height="196"/>
Born in the Amazon, working in East-Timor and studying at the University of Melbourne - George Da Silva discusses his expereinces<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205255/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank"></a> as an online student in Melbourne Law School's <a href="https://online.unimelb.edu.au/lp/global-competition-and-consumer-law?utm_source=Julie&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=GCCL2018&amp;utm_content=7017F000000d1ch" target="_blank">Global Competition and Consumer Law Program</a>.</p>
		      <iframe width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ulmzWifOSnU" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed acquisition of Donhad by Moly-Cop</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:00:34 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#donhad</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/steel-balls-2299438_1280.jpg" alt="Ball bearings" width="680" height="209"/>The ACCC announced this morning that it would not oppose Moly-Cop&rsquo;s proposed acquisition of Donhad. Although Donhad and Moly-Cop are the only two domestic manufacturers of forged steel grinding media, the ACCC found that, on balance, the proposed acquisition would be unlikely to substantially lessen competition in the supply of grinding media in Australia, in part because imports now represent 40% of total steel grinding media sold in Australia.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concerned-with-myob-acquisition-of-reckon-assets" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC will not oppose Moly-Cop’s proposed acquisition of Donhad' (Media Release, 29 March 2018)</a></p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205255/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">Merger Register: Moly-Cop - proposed acquisition of Donhad</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows joint marketing of NT gas</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#ntgasauthorised</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
 <p><img src="images/pixabay/gas-2618346_640-banner.jpg" alt="Gas fire" width="680" height="232" >
The ACCC has authorised joint marketing agreements for gas between Central Petroleum and Macquarie Mereenie which will, according to ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, allow 'further conventional gas in the Mereenie field to be developed sooner than it otherwise would'.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-joint-marketing-of-nt-gas" target="_blank">ACCC media release: ACCC allows joint marketing of NT gas</a></p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/central-and-macquarie-mereenie" target="_blank">Authorisation register:	Central and Macquarie Mereenie</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues Statement of Issues in relation to MYOB's proposed acquisition of Reckon assets</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:59:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#myob</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/matrix-2953862_1280.jpg" alt="Hand pointing at software" width="680" height="258"/>The ACCC has issued a Statement of Issues outlining concerns with MYOB's proposed acquisition of Reckon's Accountants Group.</p>
		      <p>ACCC Commissioner, Roger Featherston, said:</p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p>'If MYOB acquired Reckon&rsquo;s Accountants Group, it would likely be the only supplier of practice software suitable for medium to large accounting firms ...</p>
		        <p>'If MYOB has a monopoly on this software, it would substantially lessen competition. We think there&rsquo;s a significant risk for customers that prices will increase and service levels will decrease.'</p>
	          </blockquote>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concerned-with-myob-acquisition-of-reckon-assets" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC concerned with MYOB acquisition of Reckon assets' (Media Release, 29 March 2018)</a></p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204918/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Merger Register: MYOB Group Limited - proposed acquisition of Reckon Limited's Practice Management Group</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC postpones decision on Saputo's proposed acquisition of Murray Goulburn's operating assets</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:58:12 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#cowdelay</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="images/pixabay/cow-grass-3213933_1280.jpg" alt="Cow relaxing" width="680" height="284"/>The ACCC has postponed its final decision on Saputo's proposed acquisition ot acquire Murray Goulburn's operating assets to allow parteis to consider feedback received from market participants on the undertaking proposed by Saputo. The new proposed announcement date is the morning of 4 April 2018.</p>
		      <p>View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204196/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register: Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd proposes to acquire Murray Goulburn's operating assets.</a></p>
		      <p>See also: <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-delays-decision-over-saputo-plan-to-buy-murray-goulburn/news-story/5bc65adf77cde024f65c173d7c587324" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC delays decision over Saputo plan to buy Murray Goulburn' (The Australian, 28 March 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/5311452/accc-delays-saputo-decision-deadline/?cs=4745" target="_blank">Andrew Marshall, 'ACCC still mulling dairy feedback on Saputo's MG takeover bid' (North Queensland Register, 28 March 2018)</a>, <a href="http://adf.farmonline.com.au/news/magazine/industry-news/general/accc-told-to-butt-out-of-saputomg-deal/2756946.aspx" target="_blank">'ACCC told to butt out of Saputo-MG deal' (The Australian Dairyfarmer, 29 March 2018)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Penalties for competition law infringements in Australia</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:56:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#clenpenalties</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/microphone-2316268_1280.jpg" alt="Microphone" width="680" height="230" id="clenpenalties"/>Two of the authors of the <a href="http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/pecuniary-penalties-competition-law-infringements-australia-2018.htm" target="_blank">OECD, <em>Pecuniary Penalties for Competition Law Infringements in Australia</em> (26 March 2018)</a> report,  Sean Ennis and Pedro Carodesousa, presented their work at the Melbourne Law School's Competition Law and Economics Network discussion group today March. </p>
		      <p>Details, including presentation slides and related papers can be found on the CLEN website: <a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/engagement/discussion-group#2018 past events" target="_blank">Civil Penalties for Cartel Conduct: An OECD Review of the Australian Regime</a>.</p>
		      <p>A copy of the report and related presentations made at Monday's OECD Workshop can be found on the <a href="http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/workshop-on-australian-pecuniary-penalties-for-competition-law-infrigements.htm" target="_blank">Workshop home </a>page. This includes the Keynote presentation by Frédéric Jenny, presentations by John Connor and Caron Beaton-Wells and a paper by Sir Marcus Smith.</p>
		      <p> See also the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/oecd-finds-australian-competition-law-penalties-are-significantly-lower" title="OECD MR" target="_blank">ACCC's media release</a> in response to the release of the report and a speech by the ACCC Chairman: </p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/release-of-the-oecd%E2%80%99s-pecuniary-penalties-for-competition-law-infringements-in-australia-report" target="_blank">Rod Sims, 'Release of the OECD's Penalties for Competition Law Infringements in Australia report' (Workshop on Australian Pecuniary Penalties for Competition Law Infringements, Sydney, 26 March 2018)</a></p>
	          </blockquote>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Cartels, Optimal Enforcement and Theories in Competition Law' Symposium</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:53:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#greatsymposium</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/clarke/Brisbane 2018a.JPG" alt="Brisbane skyline 2018" width="680" height="273"/>A wonderful <a href="https://law.uq.edu.au/competition-law-2018" target="_blank">symposium</a> was held today in memory of the research of <a href="https://law.uq.edu.au/competition-law-symposium-2018/ms-laura-guttuso" target="_blank">Laura Guttuso</a>.</p>
		      <p>The focus of the symposium was cartels and, particularly, effective cartel enforcement.</p>
		      <p>Congratulations to Dr Barbora Jedlickova and her colleagues at the TC Beirne School of Law for organising the event.</p>
		      <p>Abstracts of the papers can be found here (<a href="https://law.uq.edu.au/competition-law-2018/abstracts" target="_blank">abstracts</a>) with full papers to be published in a special edition of the <a href="https://law.uq.edu.au/university-queensland-law-journal" target="_blank">University of Queensland Law Journal</a> later this year. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OECD releases pecuniary penalties report</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:06:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#oecdreport</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/images/2018oecdpenalties.JPG" alt="OECD Report" width="150" height="214" class="alignright"/><p>The OECD today released its report, <em>Pecuniary Penalties for Competition Law Infringements in Australia</em>. The report, prepared by Pedro Caro de Sousa, Sean Ennis and Semin Park, of the OECD's Competition Division, compares pecuniary sanctions for competition law infringements in Australia to that of other major OECD jurisdictions. </p>
    <p>The report concludes that 'Australia is an outlier' in relation to 'how low the pecuniary penalties it imposes are by comparison to all other systems'. Several possible explanations for this are discussed. In particular, the report details the different approach Australia takes to determining pecuniary penalties when compared with other jurisdictions. It recommends Australia consider action to 'ensure pecuniary penalties better deter anticompetitive conduct' (p 8)</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/pecuniary-penalties-competition-law-infringements-australia-2018.htm" target="_blank">OECD, <em>Pecuniary Penalties for Competition Law Infringements in Australia</em> (26 March 2018)</a></p>
    <p>The report is being presented at a closed OECD workshop in Sydney today: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/workshop-on-australian-pecuniary-penalties-for-competition-law-infrigements.htm" target="_blank">Workshop on Australian Pecuniary Penalties for Competition Law Infringements</a></p>
    <p>Two of the authors of the report,  Sean Ennis and Pedro Carodesousa, will be presenting at the Melbourne Law School's Competition Law and Economics Network discussion group on 28 March. This will be followed by commentary from Professor Caron Beaton-Wells and me. <a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/engagement/discussion-group" target="_blank">Register here!</a></p>
    <p>See also:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/why-are-corporate-penalties-for-cartels-so-low-in-australia" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells and Julie Clarke, 'Why are corporate penalties for cartels so low in Australia?' (Pursuit, 26 March 2018)</a> (see also associated paper: <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3149143" target="_blank">Beaton-Wells and Clarke, 'Corporate Financial Penalties for Cartel Conduct in Australia: A Critique' (Working Paper, 26 March 2018, available at SSRN</a>)</li>
      <li><a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/oecd-supports-higher-penalties-for-breaches/news-story/04583954aa222eab9e2169b3aef682b0" target="_blank">John Durie, 'OECD supports higher penalties for breaches' (The Australian, 26 March 2018)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/mar/26/accc-says-corporate-fines-too-low-and-it-will-pursue-penalties-in-the-hundreds-of-millions" target="_blank">Naaman Zhou, 'ACCC says corporate fines too low and it will pursue penalties in the 'hundreds of millions'' (The Guardian, 26 March 2018)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/companies-face-tougher-penalties-for-rip-offs-and-rorts-20180323-p4z602.html" target="_blank">Matthew Dunkely, 'Companies face tougher penalties for rip offs and rorts' (SMH, 26 March 2018)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises Qantas/Emirates alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:34:23 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#qantas</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/qantas-emirates.jpg" alt="Data - binary code" width="595" height="109" id="qantas"/></p>
<p>The ACCC has granted re-authorisation to the Qantas/Emirates alliance for five years, subject to a condition in relation to the Sydney/Christchurch route.</p>
    <p>The re-authorisation follows a <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-qantas-emirates-alliance" target="_blank">draft decision to re-authorise</a> in February.</p>
    <p>See authorisation <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/qantas-airways-limited-emirates" target="_blank">register for details</a>.</p>
    <p>See also </p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-re-authorises-alliance-between-qantas-and-emirates" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC re-authorises alliance between Qantas and Emirates' (23 March 2018)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.tandlnews.com.au/2018/03/23/article/no-love-lost-between-qantas-and-emirates-and-the-accc-likes-them-too/" target="_blank">Charles Pauka, 'Love not lost between Qantas and Emirates, and the ACCC likes them, too' (Transport and Logistics News, 23 March 2018)</a></li>
      <li> <a href="http://www.travelweekly.com.au/article/qantas-and-emirates-renew-their-vows/" target="_blank">'Qantas and Emirates Renew their Vows' (Travel Weekly, 23 March 2018).</a></li>
    </ul>
   ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kemp and Nicholls to lead new 'Data as a Source of Market Power' research stream</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:31:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#datastream</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p class="CaseDetails"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/binary-2910663_640.jpg" alt="Data - binary code" width="595" height="119" id="datastream"/></p>
 <p>On 14 March UNSW has launched '<a href="http://www.allenshub.unsw.edu.au/" target="_blank">The Allens Hub for Technology, Law &amp; Innovation</a>'. The hub includes ten research streams. </p>
    <p>Dr Katharine Kemp and Dr Rod Nicholls will lead the research stream '<a href="http://www.allenshub.unsw.edu.au/research-themes#dsm" target="_blank">Data as a source of market power</a>', focusing on the research question 'can control of data create market power?' and the issues that flow from a 'yes' response.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Country Care cartel case to be heard in Melbourne</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:29:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#countrycaremelbourne</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><span class="CaseDetails"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/justice-2071539_1280.jpg" alt="Lady Justice holding scales of justice" width="680" height="304" id="countrycaremelbourne2"/></span></p>
		   
		      <p>The Mildura Magistrate's Court has ordered that the committal hearing in relation to two individuals charged with cartel conduct should take place in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court. </p>
		      <p>The AFR reports that County Care managing director Robert Hogan and former busienss development manager, Cameron Harrison, are each facing dozens of charges relating to cartel conduct, including in the form of bid rigging and price fixing. </p>
		      <p>A committal mention is listed for 6 June.</p>
		      <p>See </p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/news/policy/accc-criminal-case-against-country-care-group-alleges-nationwide-cartel-20180315-h0xicr" target="_blank">David Marin-Guzman, 'ACCC criminal case against Country Care Group alleges nationwide cartel'
		          
		          (AFR, 15 March 2018) </a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.sunraysiadaily.com.au/story/5285244/country-care-cartel-case-moved-to-melbourne/" target="_blank">Christopher Testa, 'Country Care cartel case moved to Melbourne' (Sunraysia Daily, 14 March 2018)</a></li>
	          </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Independent Cinemas Australia authorised to collectively bargain with film distributors</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:28:34 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#cinema</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><span class="CaseDetails"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/film-1668918_1280.jpg" alt="Cinema - film" width="680" height="207" id="cinema"/></span></p>
		  
              <p>The ACCC has authorised Independent Cinemas Australia and its members to 'share information and collectively bargain with film distributors on the terms and conditions of film licensing agreements'.</p>
              <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-independent-cinemas-to-bargain-collectively" title="MR ICA" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>.</p>
              <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/independent-cinemas-australia-inc-authorisation-a91587" target="_blank">Authorisation register</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues statement of issues outlining concerns in relation to Pacific Nationals' proposed acquisitions of Aurizon's intermodal assets</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:27:07 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#pacific</link>
      <description><![CDATA[		      <p>The ACCC has issued a <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/icons/pdficonredsm.png" width="15" height="15" alt="PDF icon"/><a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER18+2552.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1205189&amp;trimFileName=MER18+2552.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> raising strong concerns about Pacific National's proposed acquisitions of Aurizon's 'Queensland intermodal freight haulage business and intermodal rail terminal at Acacia Ridge in Brisbane'.</p>
		      <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated:</p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p>'Aurizon&rsquo;s decision to sell its Queensland intermodal operations and the Acacia Ridge Terminal to its closest competitor, while shutting down its remaining intermodal business, will fundamentally change this market. We are concerned about the impact on competition in the freight industry.'</p>
		        <p>'We are concerned the proposed acquisitions would lead to increased prices and reduced service for freight hauled between Brisbane and Far North Queensland' </p>
	          </blockquote>
		      <p>Pacific National has offered a <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/icons/pdficonredsm.png" width="15" height="15" alt="PDF icon"/><a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER18+2542.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1205189&amp;trimFileName=MER18+2542.pdf" target="_blank">section 87B behavioural undertaking</a>, but the ACCC's preliminary review is that it will not resolve their concerns.</p>
		      <p>The ACCC is inviting further submissions in response to the Statement of Issues. Submissions are due by 3 April with a final decision expected on 24 May 2018.</p>
		      <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/strong-concerns-about-pacific-national%E2%80%99s-proposal-to-buy-aurizon-intermodal-assets" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1203319/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Merger Register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases residential mortgage price inquiry interim report </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:26:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#mortgageinquiry</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/money-2724245_1280.jpg" alt="House with piles of coins" width="680" height="209" id="mortgageinquiry"/></p>
           
              <p>The ACCC commenced a <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/inquiries/residential-mortgage-products-price-inquiry" target="_blank">residential mortgage products price inquiry</a> in 2017 and today it released its interim report. The ACCC's media release notes that the interim report 'reveals signs of less-than-vigorous price competition, especially between the big four banks'. The preliminary findings of the inquiry are discussed under the following headings:</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Full Federal Court dismisses Prysmian cartel appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:25:05 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#prysmianappeal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/hose-coupling-206004_1280.jpg" alt="High Voltage cable" width="680" height="313" id="prysmianappeal"/></p>
		     
		      <p>The Full Federal Court today dismissed an appeal by Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL against a<a href="cases/2016prysmian.html" target="_blank"> 2016 ruling</a> that it had engaged in cartel conduct in relation to the supply of high voltage land cables.</p>
		      <p>The ACCC has welcomed the Full Court's decision.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/full-federal-court-dismisses-cartel-appeal" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Full Federal Court dismisses cartel appeal' (13 March 2018)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vale Professor Bob Baxt AO</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:43:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#valebaxt</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/candle-1342227_1280.jpg" alt="Candle" width="595" height="269" /></p>
 <p>I am saddened to learn of the passing of former Chairman of the Trade Practices Commission (now ACCC), <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.htmlexperts/baxt-robert.html">Professor Bob Baxt AO</a>.</p>
    <p>Current ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims,  <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/vale-professor-bob-baxt-ao" target="_blank">described Professor Baxt</a> as a 'true champion of competition law in Australia' who 'leaves a lasting legacy'. Professor Baxt's  contribution to trade practices law and policy was recognised through the award of a <a href="http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/honour_roll/search.cfm?aus_award_id=1116282&amp;search_type=quick&amp;showInd=true" target="_blank">Centenary Medal</a> in 2001 'for service to consumer protection as chairman of the Trade Practices   Commission'. In 2003 he was appointed an <a href="http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/honour_roll/search.cfm?aus_award_id=1043219&amp;search_type=quick&amp;showInd=true" target="_blank">Officer, Order of Australia</a> for 'service to the law, particularly as a leading spokesperson in the   areas of trade practice, competition, taxation and corporate law, and in   the field of legal education'.</p>
    <p>In addition to his role as Chairman of the (then) Trade Practices Commission, Professor Baxt was Dean of Law at Monash University in the 1980s, partner at Allens Arthur Robinson and later Herbert Smith Freehills, Professorial Fellow at the Melbourne Law School and Chair of the Advisory Board for the competition and consumer law specialisation in the Melbourne Law Masters program. Since 2011 an annual '<a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/engagement/annual-baxt-lecture" target="_blank">Baxt Lecture</a>' has been held in recognition of the substantial contribution made by Professor Baxt to the development of competition law in Australia.</p>
    <p>Professor Baxt was also a founding member of the Business Law Section of the Law Council of Australia and long time member of the the competition and consumer committee (among others). In 2017 the Business Law Section of the Law Council Australia offered, for the first time, the '<a href="https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/business-law/baxt-prize" target="_blank">Baxt Prize</a>' for an outstanding research paper on the topic of 'Human Rights and Business Law'. Professor Baxt was also Chairman of the Law Committee of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.</p>
    <p>Professor Baxt  published widely and was the founder and general editor of the Australian Business Law Review and the Company and Securities Law Journal.</p>
    <p>My condolences to friends and family of Professor Baxt.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not challenge Qube MCS deal</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Mar 2018 14:40:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#qubemerger2</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/shipping-containers-1096829_1280.jpg" alt="Shipping containers" width="595" height="193"></p>
  <p>The ACCC has announced it will not take further action in relation to Qube's completed acquisition of Maritime Container Services. </p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-take-action-in-relation-to-qube-mcs-dea" title="Qube press release" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205120/fromItemId/751046" title="Qube MR" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>
    <p>See also <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-clears-qubes-alreadycompleted-maritime-container-services-buy/news-story/bec3b8b65dc404fbf897ae01d1a76c45" target="_blank">Samanntha Bailey 'ACCC clears Qube’s already-completed Maritime Container Services buy' (The Australian, 8 March 2018)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/qube-can-keep-mcs-container-parks-acquisition-accc-20180307-h0x6oc" target="_blank">Jenny Wiggins, 'Qube can keep MCS container parks acquisition: ACCC' (AFR, 8 March 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Accor-Mantra deal not opposed by ACCC</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Mar 2018 14:40:15 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#accordeal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/hotel-1049144_1280.jpg" alt="Hotel" width="595" height="238"></p>
 <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Mantra Group by AAPC Ltd (Accor).</p>
    <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, said that the 'combined Accor-Mantra will still compete with other international and national hotel chains, as well as many independent hotels and accommodation providers'</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-accors-acquisition-of-mantra" title="ACCOR press release" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1205122/fromItemId/751046" title="Accor MR" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fisse on mergers</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2018 09:09:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#fissemergers</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/hands-1063442_banner.jpg" width="595" height="286" alt="Shaking hands"/></p>
  <p><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a> has published  presentations he recently gave at an APEC Workshop on merger control. The first offers a critique of Australia's informal merger review process and the second relates to the <em>Metcash </em>saga. They can be found on <a href="https://www.brentfisse.com/publications.html" target="_blank">Brent's website</a>,  or directly from the links below:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p><img src="images/icons/pdficonredsm.png" width="15" height="15" alt=""/><em><strong><a href="https://www.brentfisse.com/images/APEC_Workshop_on_Merger_Control_Fisse_1_March_2018.pdf" target="_blank"> Merger Control in Australia: Informal and Formal Review</a></strong></em> <br />
        Brent Fisse (APEC Workshop on Merger Control Regimes, Port Moresby, 1 March 2018)</p>
      <p><img src="images/icons/pdficonredsm.png" width="15" height="15" alt=""/> <strong><em><a href="https://www.brentfisse.com/images/APEC_Workshop_on_Merger_Control_Fisse_2_March_2018.pdf" target="_blank">Merger Control in Australia: ACCC v Metcash - SLC v Legalism</a></em></strong><br />
        Brent Fisse (APEC Workshop on Merger Control Regimes, Port Moresby, 2 March 2018)</p>
    </blockquote>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN Migration Plan variation approved to allow for Fibre to the Curb</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:34:52 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#migration</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/it-838379_1280.jpg" alt="Network connection" width="595" height="229" id="migration"/></p>

    <p>The ACCC will allow Telstra to vary its NBN Migration Plan 'to enable fibre to the curb (FTTC) as a new access technology for NBN connections. Changes to the original proposed variation are designed to ensure that FTTC services are operating before existing services are disconnected.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-approves-telstras-proposed-variation-to-nbn-migration-plan" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/industry-reform/telstras-migration-plan/accc-approves-variation-to-the-migration-plan-to-facilitate-the-rollout-of-fibre-to-the-curb-for-the-nbn" target="_blank">Telstra'a Migration Plan and variation</a>.</p>
    <p>[NB: Finding it hard to get excited about anything NBN when planned rollout for my area is for <em>fixed wireless </em>to be available between <em>July-December 2019 </em>... seriously!] </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC commences inquiry into telco transmission</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2018 09:07:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#dtsc</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/optical-fiber-2077976_1280.jpg" width="595" height="257" alt="Optical fibre"/></p>
  <p>The ACCC has commenced a public inquiry to 'determine whether declaration of the Domestic Transmission Capacity Service (DTCS) remains appropriate in light of changes to the market, including the growth of commercial alternatives available to service providers, new NBN products for business customers and industry consolidation.'</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/inquiry-into-telco-transmission-commences" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a></p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/transmission-services-facilities-access/domestic-transmission-capacity-service-declaration-inquiry-2018-2019" target="_blank">Service Declaration Inquiry 2018-2019</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft authorisation for dental services pricing</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2018 09:07:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#dentist</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/dentist-zahnreinigung-1514693_1280-banner.jpg" width="595" height="285" alt="Dentist"/></p>
  <p>The ACCC is proposing to authorise health insurer HCF and participating dentists to agree on the maximum price that they will charge members for some services. As HCF is planning to establish its own clinics, authorisation has been sought to avoid contravening the cartel laws.<a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/accc-approves-gas-pricing-tie-ups-to-help-ease-energy-crisis-20180302-p4z2hs.html" target="_blank"></a></p>
    <p>The ACCC does not consider that the agreement is likely to have any significant impact on competition, noting that dentists are free to choose whether or not to participate and HCF members are free to choose a non-HCF member for their dental services. The draft ruling states that the proposed conduct 'is likely to lower the cost and increase the use of preventative dental services' and that it is 'likely to result in a net public benefit'. It is proposed that authorisation be granted for ten years.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/draft-authorisation-for-hcf-to-set-prices-for-dental-services" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a></p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/hospitals-contribution-fund-of-australia-limited" target="_blank">Authorisation register: Hospitals Contribution Fund of Australia Limited</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises maintenance coordination activities at LNG facilities in WA and NT</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:50:52 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#lng</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/construction-worker-569126_banner.jpg" width="595" height="238" alt="Maintenance worker"/></p>
  <p>The ACCC authorised Chevron, INPEX, Shell and Woodside to 'coordinate maintenance activities at their LNG facilities in Western Australia and Northern Territory.'</p>
              <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, said: 'LNG producers can now schedule maintenance together without risking breaching competition laws, reducing concurrent work at their facilities. This will improve efficiency and maximise LNG production'</p>
              <ul>
                <li>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-wa-and-nt-lng-producers" title="MR NT gas" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</li>
                <li>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/western-australian-and-northern-territory-lng-producers" title="Merger register LNG" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </li>
              </ul>
              <p>See also <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/accc-approves-gas-pricing-tie-ups-to-help-ease-energy-crisis-20180302-p4z2hs.html" target="_blank">Cole Latimer, 'ACCC approves gas pricing tie-ups to help ease energy crisis' (SMH, 2 March 2018)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues draft decision for joint marketing of NT gas</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:50:10 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#ntgas</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/gas-2618346_640-banner.jpg" width="680" height="232" alt="gas"/></p>
    <p>The ACCC has released a draft determination proposing to authorise joint gas marketing arrangements between Central Petroleum and Macquarie Mereenie (joint venture partners at the Mereenie oil and gas field).</p>
		      <p>The authorisation is proposed to run for three years. Submissions from interested parties may be made until </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues SoI on Saputo-Murray Goulburn deal</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:49:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#saputosoi</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/cows-1549746_640.jpg" width="680" height="293" alt="cows"/></p>
 <p>The ACCC has released a Statement of Issues outlining some competition concerns with Saputo's proposed acquisition of the assets of Murray Goulburn.</p>
		      <p>The concerns relate to Murray Goulburn's Koroit dairy plant in western Victoria, including the likely impact on competition for farmers' milk.</p>
		      <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, said that the ACCC's view was that 'Saputo owning the Koroit plant would substantially lessen competition for the acquisition of dairy farmers&rsquo; raw milk in the region'.</p>
		      <p>Submissions from interested parties are due by 13 March with a final decision expected by 29 March.</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-flags-concerns-about-saputo-murray-goulburn-deal" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</li>
		        <li>View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204196/fromItemId/750991" title="Merger register Saputo" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</li>
	          </ul>
		      <p>Plenty of media - see, for example, <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/saputo-has-to-spill-some-milk-to-get-mg-in-the-fast-lane/news-story/56d58b0de5f88a62491c84cff4c91a79" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Saputo has to spill some milk to get MG in the fast lane' (The Australian, 2 March 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/agriculture/accc-has-issue-with-victorian-dairy-plant-in-saputo-murray-goulburn-deal-20180228-h0wt8x" target="_blank">Carrie LaFrenz and Brad Thompson, 'ACCC has issue with Victorian dairy plant in Saputo, Murray Goulburn deal'' (AFR, 1 March 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/agribusiness/dairy/saputomurray-goulburn-deal-accc-flags-concerns/news-story/521da7c28d1828e63cee94c466e9fc34" target="_blank">Peter Hemhill and Simone Smith, 'Saputo-Murray Goulburn deal: ACCC flags concerns' (The Weekly Times, 1 March 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-03-01/accc-murray-goulburn-saputo-deal/9496030" target="_blank">Clint Jasper, 'Competition watchdog raises concern over $1.3b foreign takeover of Murray Goulburn' (ABC Rural, 1 March 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/saputo-rebuffed-on-murray-goulburn-13bn-bid-over-koroit-plant/news-story/ee203cee13b49aa902108d0ecdd000ee" target="_blank">Sue Neales, 'Saputo rebuffed on Murray Goulburn $1.3bn bid over Koroit plant' (The Australian, 2 March 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/mega-milk-deal-sparks-accc-concern-for-farmers-20180301-p4z28h.html" target="_blank">Darren Gray, 'Mega-milk deal sparks ACCC concern for farmers' (SMH, 1 March 2018)</a>.</p>
	        </div>
		    <p>&nbsp;</p>
		    <div class="box-text">
		      <p> <img src="images/pixabay/carnival-2674574_640.jpg" width="680" height="271" alt="Carnival cruise ship"/></p>
		      <h3 id="priorities5">1 March 2018 - Draft decision on Port of Brisbane and Carnival agreement</h3>
		      <p>The ACCC has issued a draft authorisation for an agreement between Port of Brisbane and Carnival Cruise line relating to the development of a new dedicated cruise liner terminal. </p>
		      <p>The ACCC proposes to impose conditions in relation to certain aspects of the agreement that might limit competition from other cruise liners.</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/draft-decision-on-port-of-brisbane-and-carnival-agreement" title="MR Port of Brisbane" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</li>
		        <li>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/port-of-brisbane-pty-ltd-carnival-plc" title="Merger register Saputo" target="_blank">public authorisation register</a>. </li>
	          </ul>
	        </div>
		    <p>&nbsp;</p>
		    <div class="box-text">
				<p> <img src="images/pixabay/piggy-2889046_banner.jpg" alt="Piggy bank" width="680" height="314" />   </p>
			 <h3 id="priorities2">28 February 2018 - ACCC remarks: Competition in the Australian Financial System</h3>
		      <p>The ACCC has welcomed the <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/financial-system" target="_blank">Productivity Commission's draft report into Competition in the Financial System</a> at a <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/financial-system/public-hearings" target="_blank">public hearing</a> this morning.</p>
		      <p>Speaking at the public hearing this morning, Marcus Bezzi (Executive General Manager (Enforcement &amp; Compliance Division)) focused his remarks on:</p>
		      <ol>
		        <li>Competition Advocacy </li>
		        <li>The ACCC's Financial Services Unit</li>
		        <li>'Embedding greater transparency in decision-making and a commitment to competition'</li>
	          </ol>
		      <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/opening-statement-at-the-pc-public-hearing-into-competition-in-the-australian-financial-system" target="_blank">the ACCC's opening statement</a>.</p>
		      <p>The opening statements were followed by questioning from PC Commissioners. The opening statements and subsequent discussion was streamed this morning and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/productivitycommission/videos/809629705900822/" target="_blank">can be viewed via Facebook</a> (skip through to the 3 hour mark to hear Marcus Bezzi and Molly Choucair (General Manager, Financial Services Unit) speaking on behalf of the ACCC).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft decision on Port of Brisbane and Carnival agreement</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:47:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#ports</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/carnival-2674574_640.jpg" width="680" height="271" alt="Carnival cruise ship"/>
  <p>The ACCC has issued a draft authorisation for an agreement between Port of Brisbane and Carnival Cruise line relating to the development of a new dedicated cruise liner terminal. </p>
		      <p>The ACCC proposes to impose conditions in relation to certain aspects of the agreement that might limit competition from other cruise liners.</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/draft-decision-on-port-of-brisbane-and-carnival-agreement" title="MR Port of Brisbane" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</li>
		        <li>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/port-of-brisbane-pty-ltd-carnival-plc" title="Merger register Saputo" target="_blank">public authorisation register</a>. </li>
	          </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC remarks: Competition in the Australian Financial System</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:45:18 +1400</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#pcstatement</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has welcomed the <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/financial-system" target="_blank">Productivity Commission's draft report into Competition in the Financial System</a> at a <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/financial-system/public-hearings" target="_blank">public hearing</a> this morning.</p>
    <p>Speaking at the public hearing this morning, Marcus Bezzi (Executive General Manager (Enforcement &amp; Compliance Division)) focused his remarks on:</p>
    <ol>
      <li>Competition Advocacy </li>
      <li>The ACCC's Financial Services Unit</li>
      <li>'Embedding greater transparency in decision-making and a commitment to competition'</li>
    </ol>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/opening-statement-at-the-pc-public-hearing-into-competition-in-the-australian-financial-system" target="_blank">the ACCC's opening statement</a>.</p>
    <p>The opening statements were followed by questioning from PC Commissioners. The opening statements and subsequent discussion was streamed this morning and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/productivitycommission/videos/809629705900822/" target="_blank">can be viewed via Facebook</a> (skip through to the 3 hour mark to hear Marcus Bezzi and Molly Choucair (General Manager, Financial Services Unit) speaking on behalf of the ACCC).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital platform issues paper released</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:05:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2017digitalplatforms.html#digitalplatformsip</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released an issues paper in relation to its Digital Platform inquiry. In its media release the ACCC indicates it is seeking feedback on:</p>
              <ul>
                <li>'Whether digital platforms have bargaining power in their dealings with media content creators, advertisers or consumers and the implications of that bargaining power.                  </li>
                <li>Whether digital platforms have impacted media organisations’ ability to fund and produce quality news and journalistic content for Australians                  </li>
                <li>How technological change and digital platforms have changed the media and advertising services markets, and the way consumers access news                  </li>
                <li>The extent to which consumers understand what data is being collected about them by digital platforms, and how this information is used                  </li>
                <li>How the use of algorithms affects the presentation of news for digital platform users.'</li>
              </ul>
              <p>The issues paper itself runs to 39 pages, although much of this is background information. In addition to asking six questions regarding the scope of the inquiry, the issues paper asks 36 stakeholder questions.</p>
              <p>Submissions are due by 3 April 2018. More informal submissions can be made via a questionnaire on the <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/communications/consumer-portal/" target="_blank">ACCC's consultation hub</a> by the same date.              </p>
              <p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2017digitalplatforms.html">my inquiry page</a> for more details.</p>
              <p>See also</p>
              <ul>
                <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/inquiries/digital-platforms-inquiry/issues-paper" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/inquiries/digital-platforms-inquiry/issues-paper" target="_blank">Issues Paper</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/world-watching-accc-inquiry-into-dominant-tech-platforms/news-story/a64c2aff7c82142187a8a982e916bd8d" target="new">Darren Davidson, 'World watching ACCC inquiry into dominant tech platforms' (The Australian, 26 February 2018)</a></li>
              </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC announces 2018 priorities</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:43:09 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#prioritiesbanner</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>In his annual address to CEDA in Sydney today ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, launched the ACCC's 2018 Compliance and Enforcement policy.</p>
              <p>This year the focus for the ACCC in relation to competition issues will be:</p>
              <ul>
                <li>conduct that might contravene the new misuse of market power prohibition</li>
                <li>conduct that might contravene the new prohibition on concerted practices </li>
                <li>competition issues in the financial services sector</li>
                <li>competition issues in the commercial construction sector</li>
              </ul>
              <p>In relation to both competition and consumer issues the focus will be </p>
              <ul>
                <li>competition and consumer isssues concerning 'the use of digital platforms, algorithms and consumer data, with a focus on emerging markets and matters identified by the ACCC's digital platforms inquiry'</li>
                <li>competition and consumer issues in relation to the provision of energy</li>
                <li>competition and consumer issues in the agriculture sector</li>
              </ul>
              <p>In relation to consumer issues, the priorities will be:</p>
              <ul>
                <li>systematic consumer guarantee issues</li>
                <li>consumer issues in broadband services</li>
                <li>consumer issues in new car retailing</li>
                <li>ensuring small business receives their industry code and unfair contract term protections (focus on Franchising Code of Conduct)</li>
                <li>better product safety outcomes for consumers shopping online</li>
                <li>issues relating ot the Takata airbag recall</li>
              </ul>
              <p>The Policy also notes 'enduring priorities', including cartel conduct, anti-competitive agreements and misuse of market power and reiterates its priority factors, including conduct of significant public interest/concern or conduct resulting in substantial consumer or small business detriment.</p>
              <p>View:</p>
              <ul>
                <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/2018-compliance-enforcement-priorities" target="_blank">Rod Sims, '2018 compliance and enforcement priorities' (CEDA, Sydney, 20 February 2018)</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-focusses-on-energy-broadband-net-economy-and-financial-services-in-2018" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC focusses on energy, broadband, net economy and financial services in 2018' (Media Release, 20 February 2018)</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/compliance-and-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Compliance and Enforcement Policy' (2018)</a></li>
              </ul>
              <p>Plenty of media about the priorities, including:</p>
              <ul>
                <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/news/policy/accc-to-crack-down-on-banks-anti-competitive-behaviour-20180219-h0wbu5" target="_blank">Misa Han, 'ACCC to crack down on banks' anti competitive behaviour' (AFR, 20 Feb 2018)</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/accc-to-push-for-bigger-fines-for-competition-breaches/news-story/574fa5faa48db03abd58a2391e6eed3c" target="_blank">Andrew White, 'ACCC to push for bigger fines for competition breaches' (The Australian, 20 February 2018)</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://www.choice.com.au/shopping/consumer-rights-and-advice/your-rights/articles/accc-targets-energy-car-broadband-industries-2018-200218" target="_blank">Tony Ibrahim, 'The markets the ACCC will be watching closely' (Choice, 20 February 2018)</a></li>
                <li><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-20/larger-fines-for-big-business-tops-accc-priority-list/9465346" target="_blank">Sarah Farnsworth and Naomi Selvaratnam, 'ACCC puts big business on notice as larger fines for consumer breaches tops 2018 priority list' (ABC, 20 Feb 2018)</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://www.sbs.com.au/news/accc-wants-bigger-fines-for-bigger-firms" target="_blank">AAP, 'ACCC wants bigger fines for bigger firms' (SBS, 20 Feb 2018)</a></li>
              </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC appeals Cussons decision</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:42:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#cussonsappeal</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has appealed the Federal Court's decision in December last year in which it dismissed the ACCC's claims that PZ Cussons had engaged in cartel conduct in relation to laundry detergents.</p>
		      <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated that the ACCC believed  'that there was sufficient evidence for the Court to find that Cussons had entered into an understanding' and that the appeal will allow the Full Court to 'consider whether the trial judge should have inferred an understanding involving Cussons based on the uncontested evidence in this case.'</p>
<p>A case management hearing is scheduled before Justice Wigney on Thursday.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-cussons-decision" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC appeals Cussons decision' (Media Release, 20 February 2018)</a></p>
<p>See also <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/accc-appeals-cartel-case-against-cussons/news-story/b60336b78e26bb3e2e673edc3b09fff0" target="_blank">Roje Adaimy, 'ACCC appeals cartel case against Cussons' (The Australian, 20 February 2018)</a> and <a href="https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/02/20/11/32/accc-appeals-cartel-case-against-cussons" target="_blank">'ACCC appeals cartel case against Cussons' (9 news, 20 February 2018)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gilbert + Tobin Competition Law Insights 2018</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:28:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Gilbert + Tobin have published their 'Competition Law Insights 2018'. The report:</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li>explores recent changes to the competition laws</li>
		        <li>examines the ACCC's activity in 2017 (including by providing some useful case studies) </li>
		        <li>predicts what's in store for the year ahead (focussing on merger and cartel activity)</li>
	          </ul>
		      <p>The report provides a neat overview of the Harper reforms and a useful table detailing the new merger processes. It also examines some of the current competition law related inquiries, including those into Australia's financial system and the digital platforms inquiry.</p>
		      <p>The <a href="https://www.gtlaw.com.au/insights/competition-law-insights-2018" target="_blank">report can be downloaded from the Gilbert + Tobin website</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on ACCC priorities</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2018 12:42:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, spoke with Patricia Karvelas for the National Wrap.</p>
		      <p>View the <a href="http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/national-wrap/NC1822V003S00" target="_blank">National Wrap on iView</a> from just past the 4 minute mark to 13:51 - focus on the NBN, gas markets and the Facebook/Google inquiry.</p>
		      <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
		        <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Don’t miss my interview with <a href="https://twitter.com/acccgovau?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@acccgovau</a> boss Rod Sims tonight on <a href="https://twitter.com/abcnews?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@abcnews</a> after 9pm <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/auspol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#auspol</a> <a href="https://t.co/npcwzZhOqd">pic.twitter.com/npcwzZhOqd</a></p>
		        &mdash; PatriciaKarvelas (@PatsKarvelas) <a href="https://twitter.com/PatsKarvelas/status/965148545849335808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 18, 2018</a></blockquote>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to re-authorise Qantas-Emirates alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:41:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC is proposing to re-authorise the Qantas/Emirates alliance for a further five years.</p>
		      <p>See authorisation <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/qantas-airways-limited-emirates" target="_blank">register for details</a>.</p>
		      <p>See also </p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-qantas-emirates-alliance" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC proposes to re-authorise Qantas Emirates alliance' (16 February 2018)</a></li>
		        <li> <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/accc-flags-all-clear-for-fresh-qantas-emirates-tieup/news-story/3c95c2089cec04ebe90c43de96ce4625" target="_blank">Annabel Hepworth, 'ACCC flags all clear for fresh Qantas Emirates tie-up' (The Australian, 16 February 2018).</a></li>
	          </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows Jetstar's Asian brands to coordinate</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:41:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has re-authorised the coordination of Jetstar Asia, Jetstar Pacific and Jetstar Japan.</p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-jetstars-asian-brands-to-coordinate" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC allows Jetstar's Asian brands to coordinate' (Media Release, 16 February 2018)</a></p>
              <p>See also <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/qantas-airways-limited-jetstar-airways-pty-ltd" target="_blank">ACCC authorisation register</a> and <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/qantas-regulator/australia-consumer-watchdog-reauthorises-coordination-of-qantas-asian-tie-ups-idUSL4N1Q55II" target="_blank">Reuters staff, 'Australia consumer watchdog reauthorises coordination of Qantas' Asian tie-ups' (Reuters, 16 February 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Criminal cartel proceedings commenced</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:21:46 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[      <p>Criminal cartel charges have been laid against The County Care Group Pty Ltd, its Managing Director and a former employee. </p>
              <p>The charges against County Care Group represent the first criminal prosecution of an Australian corporation and the second criminal prosecution of a cartel <em>(the first being <a href="cases/2017nyk.html">NYK</a>) </em>under the criminal cartel provisions of the <em>Competition and Consumer Act</em>.</p>
              <p>The charges against County Care Group's Managing Director and a former employee represent the first time individuals have been prosecuted under thse provisions.</p>
              <p>The charges are listed for mention in the Victorian Magistrates' Court in Mildura on 14 March 2018.</p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/criminal-cartel-proceedings-commenced-against-country-care-and-its-managers" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Criminal cartel proceedings commenced against Country Care and its managers' (Media Release, 15 February 2018)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Productivity commission issues draft report on Competition in the Australian Financial System</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:02:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The Productivity Commission has released its <a href="https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/financial-system/draft" target="_blank">draft report on Competition in the Australian Financial System</a>.</p>
              <p>The report argues that competition in the financial system 'is without a champion among the existing regulators'. When considering who should promote financial system competition the PC considered two options: (1) the ACCC to have expanded role as proactive competition advocate or (2) that ASIC's focus be expanded to include advancement of competition. Draft recommendation 17.1 states:</p>
              <blockquote>
                <p>'To address gaps in the regulatory architecture related to lack of effective consideration
                  of competitive outcomes in financial markets, an existing regulator must be given a
                  mandate to take the lead on matters related to competition in the financial system.
                  To minimise cost and disruption, this role should be implemented in substantial part
                  through the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR).</p>
                <p>There would be no change under this recommendation to the current legislated
                  responsibilities of the regulators. Rather, the Australian Government should include in
                  its Statement of Expectations for all members of the CFR the practice of reviewing,
                  before they are implemented, regulator actions that may have material effects on
                  competition. </p>
                <p>The competition-related functions of the designated Council member would include: </p>
                <ul>
                  <li>transparent analysis of competition impacts tabled in advance of measures proposed
                    by regulators </li>
                  <li>testing of the impacts of competition and community outcomes of additional provider
                    integration.'</li>
                </ul>
              </blockquote>
              <p>This is followed by an 'information request', seeking feedback on the merits of each option (ACCC or ASIC as regulator responsible for advancing competition)</p>
              <p>Various other draft findings (inculcating that the 'Four Pillars policy is a redundant convention') and recommendations are made in relation to competition in the financial system.</p>
              <p>The final report is expected to be completed by 1 July 2018</p>
              <p>Plenty of media: <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-07/productivity-commission-warns-four-pillars-banking-policy-ad-hoc/9402742" target="_blank">Peter Ryan, '&quot;Four pillars&quot; banking policy is &quot;ad hoc&quot; and &quot;redundant&quot;, Productivity Commission warns' (ABC News, 7 February 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/financial-services/apra-delivers-banks-1b-windfall-productivity-commission-20180206-h0ulfe" target="_blank">Joanna Mather and James Eyers, 'APRA delivers banks $1b windfall: Productivity Commission' (AFR, 7 February 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/business/productivity-commission-call-for-new-competition-watchdog/news-story/46c8b2c6f44b9ea2ad0929be73379ae8" target="_blank">Jennifer Jennings, 'Productivity Commission call for new competition watchdog' (Daily Telegraph, 7 February 2018)</a>, <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/four-pillars-policy-under-fire-from-productivity-commission-20180206-p4yzio.html" target="_blank">Clancy Yeates, '&quot;Four pillars&quot; policy under fire from Productivity Commission' (The Age, 7 February 2018)</a>, <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/bankings-fourpillars-policy-redundant-claims-watchdog/news-story/f8e4b39d4e93ddece72b005ec45910f4" target="_blank">Simon Benson, 'Banking's four-pillars policy redundant, claims watchdog' (The Australian, 7 February 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media mergers and the ACCC's role in merger authorisations</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:02:34 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Michael Corrigon and Simon Ellis at Clayton Utz provide some thoughts on the ACCC's new role in merger authorisation and discuss media mergers by reference to the New Zealand High Court's decision in <a href="http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2017/3186.html" target="_blank">NZME Limited v Fairfax Media Limited [2017] NSHC 3186</a> (<a href="http://www.fairfaxmedia.com.au/pressroom/au---nz-press-room/au---nz-press-room/appeal-of-high-court-of-new-zealand-decision-declining-stuff/nzme-merger-clearance-or-authorisation" target="_blank">recently appealed</a>) and Australia's new <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/media-merger-guidelines-2017" target="_blank">Media Merger Guidelines</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.claytonutz.com/knowledge/2018/february/whats-the-big-deal-media-mergers-and-the-acccs-new-role-in-merger-authorisations?utm_source=Mondaq&amp;utm_medium=syndication&amp;utm_campaign=View-Original" target="_blank">Michael Corrigan and Simon Ellis, 'What's the big deal? Media mergers and the ACCC's new role in merger authorisations' (Clayton Utz, Knowledge, 1 Feb 2018)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Law Symposium</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:02:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The symposium, <strong>Cartels, Optimal Enforcement and Theories in Competition Law</strong>, will be held in Brisbane on 27 March 2018. The symposium has been organised by the TC Beirne School of Law at the University of Queensland in memory of the research of former PhD student, <a href="https://law.uq.edu.au/competition-law-symposium-2018/ms-laura-guttuso" target="_blank">Laura Guttuso</a>.</p>
    <p>The <a href="https://law.uq.edu.au/competition-law-symposium-2018/program" target="_blank">program</a>, which can be <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/icons/pdficonredsm.png" width="15" height="15" alt=""/><a href="documents/2018CompetitionLawSymposiumProgram.pdf"> downloaded here</a>, features keynote speakers from around the world. </p>
    <p>Various registration options are available. To find out more visit the <a href="https://law.uq.edu.au/competition-law-2018" target="_blank">symposium website</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC merger reviews</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:01:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has initiated a few informal merger reviews to kick of the year.</p>
    <p>The first is <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204745/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Cleanaway Waste Management's proposed acquisition of Tox Free Solutions</a>. A market inquiries letter was sent on 11 January and submissions are due 9 Feb, with a provisional announcement date of 29 March 2018.</p>
    <p>The second is <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204918/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">MYOB's proposed acquisition of Reckon Limited's Practice Management Group</a>; an informal review commenced on 12 January accompanied by a market inquiries letter. Submissions are due by 1 Feb with a provisional announcement date of 22 March 2018. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-to-probe-myobs-reckon-acquisition/news-story/87e2671c9de3a282983130b478923ad5" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC to probe MYOB's Reckon acquisition' (The Australian, 15 January 2018)</a> and <a href="https://www.crn.com.au/news/accc-to-investigate-myobs-180-million-acquisition-of-reckon-481133" target="_blank">Brendon Foye, 'ACCC to investigate MYOB's $180 million acquisition of Reckon' (CRN, 15 January 2018)</a>.</p>
    <p>Yesterday the ACCC commenced a review of <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204875/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Qube Logistics' completed acquisition of Maritime Container Services Pty Ltd</a>. Qube has provided the ACCC with an undertaking to keep the MCS business separate and independent until at least 14 March 2018. Submissions on a market inquiries letter are due by 1 February. As this is a completed acquisition the ACCC have not provided a provisional announcement date. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-queries-qubes-mcs-acquisition/news-story/29c6ac799dea4036ab1d63d316e0b5ee" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC queries Qube's MCS acquisition' (The Australian, 16 January 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Decision published in ACCC's detergent cartel case</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:28:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/laundry-413688_640.jpg" alt="Commercial laundry" width="220" height="144" class="alignleft"/>The decision in the ACCC's case against PZ Cussons alleging participation in a laundry detergent cartel was handed down late last year, with Justice Wigney dismissing the ACCC's claim; the reasons for judgment have now been published.</p>
		      <p>In 2013 the ACCC commenced actions against Colgate, Cussons, Unilever and Woolworths alleging price fixing conduct contrary to s 45 of the <em>Trade Practices Act </em>1974 as it was at the relevant time. Both Colgate and Woolworths made admissions in 2016 (Unilever was the Immunity applicant) and were ordered to pay penalties totalling $18m and $9m respectively.</p>
		      <p>Cussons challenged the claims and the hearing commenced 7 June 2016, running over several days. Justice Wigney handed down his decision on 22 December, finding that the ACCC had not discharged its burden of proving, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondent had entered into the claimed arrangement or understanding.	The	reasons for judgment have now been released and show that Justice Wigney preferred the economic evidence suggesting the conduct resulted from oligopoly behaviour rather than agreement.</p>
		      <p>View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2017colgate.html">case page for more details</a>.</p>
		      <p>See also:</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="https://jade.io/article/568332" target="_blank">ACCC v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1590</a></li>
		        <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-dismisses-case-against-cussons" title="Cussons ACCC" target="_blank">ACCC Media Release (22 Dec 2017)</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/laundry-cartel-case-against-cussons-dismissed-20171222-h09m1i.html" target="_blank">AAP, 'Laundry cartel case against Cussons dismissed' (SMH, 23 December 2017)</a>, </li>
	          </ul>
		      <p>Colgate: </p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/colgate-ordered-to-pay-18-million-penalty-in-laundry-detergent-cartel-proceedings" target="_blank">ACCC Colgate media release</a>. </li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2016/528.html" target="_blank">ACCC v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 528 (16 May 2016)</a></li>
	          </ul>
		      <p>Woolworths</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="https://jade.io/article/479793" target="_blank">ACCC v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 676</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/woolworths-ordered-to-pay-9-million-in-penalties-in-laundry-detergent-cartel-proceedings" title="Woolworths media release" target="_blank">ACCC Woolworths media release</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/woolworths-expected-to-admit-cartel-behaviour/news-story/fb35d95f73ed451e5c1984efd61b9400" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Woolworths admits cartel behaviour' (The Australian, 3 June 2016)</a> </li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/woolworths-dirty-laundry/news-story/de426486e1764159c810e2023e6f491e" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Woolworths' dirty laundry' (The Australian, 4 June 2016)</a>.</li>
	          </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Criminal cartel cases loom</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 Jan 2018 10:27:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/special/design-3047520_640.jpg" alt="Jump from 2017-2018" width="250" height="106" class="alignleft"/>In an interview with the AFR, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, claims 2018 will be a 'big turning point for cartel enforceement', with 'three to four domestic-based criminal cartel actions' expected.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/legal/accc-seeks-jail-time-big-fines-in-cartel-cases-20171219-h07gp4" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'ACCC's criminal cartel cases seek jail time, big fines from companies
		        
		        (AFR, 8 January 2018)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-to-launch-criminal-cartel-cases/news-story/df6c2918149a7a34a81e2737d813dc79" target="_blank">Glenda Korporaal, 'ACCC to launch criminal cartel cases' (The Australian, 9 January 2018)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supermarket Power in Australia - Public Symposium highlights</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:20:14 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>A video of highlights from the Melbourne Law School's public symposium, '<a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/engagement/supermarket-power-in-australia" target="_blank">Supermarket Power in Australia: Looking Back and Ahead</a>' (27 October 2017) is now available.</p>
   
    <p>The symposium was inspired by a major ARC funded research project being conducted by the University (the <a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/research/supermarket-project" target="_blank">Supermarket Power Project</a>) and led by Prof <a href="experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Caron Beaton-Wells</a>.  </p> <p><iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/247417978" width="320" height="180" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BHP and Esso undertake to separately market gas produced under Gippsland Basin Joint Venture</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:19:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC have accepted court enforceable undertakings from BHP Billiton Petroleum (Bass Strait) and Esso Resources Australia to 'separately market their share of gas produced under the Gippsland Basin Joint Venture' from 1 January 2019. </p>
    <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, said that the 'ACCC was concerned that the joint marketing arrangements were likely to have resulted in a substantial lessening of competition in the market for the supply of gas to buyers in the southern states' and that the ACCC believed 'that competition in this market was negatively affected by the elimination of independent rivalry between BHP and Esso.'</p>
    <p>BHP and Esso have, without admission, 'each provided the ACCC with a court enforceable undertaking that requires them to separately market GBJV gas from 1 January 2019 so that buyers will have the benefit of competing and potentially different offers from Esso and BHP in the future.'</p>
    <p>See ACCC <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/bhp-and-esso-to-separately-market-gippsland-basin-gas" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
    <p>View undertakings:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p><a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204828" target="_blank">BHP Billiton Petroleum (Bass Strait) Pty Ltd undertaking (18 Dec 2017)</a></p>
      <p><a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204824" target="_blank">Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd undertaking (18 Dec 2017)</a>    </p>
      </blockquote>   <p>See also<a href="http://www.afr.com/business/accc-drives-bass-strait-marketing-divorce-20171218-h06m1p" target="_blank">, Matthew Stevens, 'ACCC drives Bass Strait marketing divorce' (AFR, 18 December 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/victorian-gas-prices-may-fall-as-bhp-and-esso-split-gas-sales-20171217-p4yxss.html" target="_blank">'Victorian gas prices may fall as BHP and Esso split gas sales' (SMH, 18 December 2017)</a>, Andrew <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/gas-deal-eases-fears-over-east-coast-supply/news-story/60ed690c6852384c2eaaf93546f29030" target="_blank">White, 'Gas deal eases fears over east coast supply' (The Australian, 19 December 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BP to fight ACCC's opposition of proposed acquisition fo Woolworths service stations</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:19:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a press release issued by BP following the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-bps-acquisition-of-woolworths-service-stations" target="_blank">ACCC announcing its opposition</a> to BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths service stations, BP Australia President Andy Holmes said:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>'We are disappointed by the news today from the ACCC. We remain confident that, with appropriate divestments as offered by BP, this transaction would not substantially lessen competition. In light of this, we are currently consulting with our lawyers to determine our next steps'</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/media/press-releases/bp-to-consider-acccs-decision.html" title="BP oppose" target="_blank">BP media release ('BP to consider ACCC's decision) (14 December 2017)</a>. </p>
    <p>Media reports suggest that the ACCC's opposition will not be the end of BP's bid for the Woolworths service stations, citing Holmes as saying: 'This deal is very much alive and on foot ... My plan is that we will present our case strongly again ...'</p>
    <ul>
      <li>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-to-oppose-woolworths-sale-of-service-stations-to-bp/news-story/9e087583a8666cc718320fa09b92a031" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'BP to fight ACCC ruling opposing Woolworths’ sale of service stations' (The Australian, 14 December 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/bp-and-woolworths-will-fight-to-save-their-1-8-billion-servo-sale-20171213-p4yxp3.html" target="_blank">Patrick Hatch, 'BP and Woolworths vow to fight to save $1.8 billion servo sale' (SMH, 14 December 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will oppose BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths service stations</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:40:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced today that it will oppose the proposed acquisition by BP Australia Pty Ltd of Woolworths Limited's network of retail service station sites.</p>
    <p>The ACCC considers that the acquisition would be likely to 'substantially lessen competition in the retail supply of fuel', noting that 'BP prices are significantly higher on average than Woolworths prices in the major capital cities'.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-bps-acquisition-of-woolworths-service-stations" title="BP oppose" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204787/fromItemId/751046" title="MR BP" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>
    <p>For media see, eg, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-to-oppose-woolworths-sale-of-service-stations-to-bp/news-story/9e087583a8666cc718320fa09b92a031" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'ACCC to oppose Woolworths’ sale of service stations to BP' (The Australian, 14 December 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed acquisition of the Jubilee Highway Sawmill</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:39:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose OneFortyOne Plantations' proposed acquisition of the Jubilee Highway Sawmill in Mt Gambier.</p>
    <p>The ACCC concluded the merger was not likely to substantially lessen competition; in particular, it considered that notwithstanding increased vertical integration, OneFortyOne would 'continue to have incentives to supply sawlogs to other sawmills and to acquire woodchips'.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-jubilee-sawmill-acquisition" title="Sawmill" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204794/fromItemId/751046" title="MR sawmill" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases second interim report as part of Gas Inquiry</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:39:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released its 'second iterim report as part of its inquiry in Australia's wholesale gas supply arrangements. This follows an <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/serial-publications/gas-inquiry-2017-2020/gas-inquiry-september-2017-interim-report" target="_blank">earlier report released in September</a>.</p>
    <p>When releasing the report, ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, observed that:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>'Despite increased supply providing important short-term improvements in conditions, the market is still not operating as well as it could. Prices remain higher than they would be in a well-functioning and competitive market'.</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>View ACCC press release: <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/some-improvements-in-gas-market-but-prices-still-too-high" target="_blank">'Some improvements in gas market, but prices still too high' (12 December 2017)</a>.</p>
    <p>View Report: <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/serial-publications/gas-inquiry-2017-2020/gas-inquiry-december-2017-interim-report" target="_blank">ACCC Gas Inquiry 2017-20 Interim Report (13 December 2017)</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/energy/gas-inquiry-2017-2020" target="_blank">also Gas Inquiry 2017-2020 website</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed merger of Fox Sports and Foxtel</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:39:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed merger of Fox Sports and Foxtel, finding that the transaction would not substantially lessen competition.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-the-proposed-merger-of-fox-sports-and-foxtel" title="MR Foxtel" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
    <p>View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204706/fromItemId/751046" title="Merger Register Foxtel" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>
    <p>See also: </p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/business/media-and-marketing/tv/accc-green-lights-foxtelfox-sports-merger-20171206-h009va" target="_blank">Max Mason, 'ACCC green lights Foxtel-Fox Sports merger' (AFR, 7 December 2017)</a> and<a href="http://www.afr.com/business/media-and-marketing/tv/rivals-concerned-over-acccs-green-light-on-foxtelfox-sports-merger-20171207-h011t8" target="_blank"> 'Rivals concerned over ACCC's green light on Foxtel-Fox Sports merger' (AFR, 10 December 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/accc-wont-oppose-the-proposed-merger-of-fox-sports-and-foxtel/news-story/7d540119c9798c00b89cc5b2733f67f5" target="_blank">Darren Davidson, 'ACCC won’t oppose the proposed merger of Fox Sports and Foxtel' (The Australian, 7 December 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/green-light-given-to-fox-sports-and-foxtel-merger-20171206-p4yxh3.html" target="_blank">Jennifer Duke, 'Green light given to Foxtel and Fox Sports merger' (SMH, 7 December 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/foxtel-fox-sports-merger-unopposed-by-regulator/" target="_blank">Connie Reichert, 'Foxtel-Fox Sports merger unopposed by regulator' (ZD Net, 7 December 2017)</a>.</li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC commences digital platform inquiry</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:17:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2017digitalplatforms.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>As part of the deal to get the media law reforms through through the Senate in September, the government agreed to an inquiry into Google and Facebook and other digital platforms.</p>
              <p>The Government has now directed the ACCC to commence this inquiry, which will look at the effect 'digital search engines, social media platforms and other digital content aggregation platforms are having on competition in media and advertising services markets'.</p>
              <p>An issues paper will be distributed early in 2018. A preliminary report is expected in twelve months with a final report due six months later, in June 2019.</p>
              <p><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2017digitalplatforms.html">See <strong>my report page </strong>for further details</a>, including links to media surrounding the inquiry. See also:</p>
              <blockquote>
                <p><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-commences-inquiry-into-digital-platforms" title="Digital platform MR" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a></p>
                <p><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/inquiries/digital-platforms-inquiry" target="_blank">Digital Inquiry page</a> (including terms of reference)</p>
              </blockquote>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Grattan Report: Competition in Australia: Too little of a good thing?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:17:07 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Grattan Institute has released a new report - <em><a href="https://grattan.edu.au/report/competition-in-the-australian-economy/" title="Good thing" target="_blank">Competition in Australia: Too little of a good thing?</a></em></p>
		      <p>The press release accompanying the report notes:</p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p>'The widely held belief that powerful firms control the Australian economy is a myth.</p>
		        <p>The market shares of large firms in concentrated sectors are not much higher in Australia than in other countries, and they have they not grown much lately.</p>
		        <p>But where a few firms dominate markets, they earn higher profits.'</p>
	          </blockquote>
		      <p>The report also observes that governments and regulators could do more to ensure consumers get a good deal - and that constraints on competition in retail pharmacy be removed.</p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p><a href="https://grattan.edu.au/report/competition-in-the-australian-economy/" target="_blank">View report</a> (associated chart data can also be separately downloaded). </p>
		        <p>Listen to <a href="https://grattan.edu.au/podcast/competition-in-australia-too-little-of-a-good-thing/" target="_blank">associated podcast</a>.</p>
	          </blockquote>
		      <p>The release of the report follows a Grattan Institute Policy Pitch event in November, featuring <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Prof Caron Beaton-Wells</a> and <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/king-stephen.html">Dr Stephen King</a>, with Jim Minifie as moderator. That event can be viewed here:</p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p><a href="https://vimeo.com/237668804" target="_blank">Vimeo page</a>: <a href="https://vimeo.com/237668804">Competition in the Australian economy: too little of a good thing? &ndash; Melbourne</a> from <a href="https://vimeo.com/user8853932">Grattan Institute</a> on <a href="https://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
	          </blockquote>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not appeal Tabcorp merger authorisation</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:16:39 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has announced it will not appeal the Tribunal's decision to authorise the Tabcorp<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/populism-and-the-cca" target="_blank"></a>/Tatts merger, observing that although it takes a different view from the Tribunal about public benefits/detriments in this case, it does 'not consider there is any error of law that needs to be corrected'.</p>

		      <blockquote>
		        <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-seek-review-of-tabcorp-tatts-determination" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC won't seek review of Tabcorp-Tatts determination' (1 December 2017)</a></p>
	          </blockquote>
		      <p>The public reasons for decision are also available from the Federal Court site (at just over 350 pages they're about 100 pages longer than the original authorisation): <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2017/2017acompt0005" target="_blank">Applications by Tabcorp Holdings Limited [2017] ACompT 5</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New CCA consolidation</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:47:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The latest consolidation of the Competition and Consumer Act was published today and this time it does include the Harper Reforms.</p>
		      <p>See: </p>
              <p><a href="https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00375">CCA 2010, Federal Register of Legislation (Compilation No 112)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on populism and the CCA</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:47:15 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, delivered a speech at the RBB Economics conference today, explaining how recent changes to the Act, 'help protect the competitive process, and why 2018 will be a great year for competition'.</p>
    <p>In his speech Sims observes that under Australian competition law 'fairness is not, and never will be, a theory of harm', but that despite this, the CCA does 'more for actual and perceived fairness than any other Act'.</p>
    <p>Sims also notes that the ACCC currently has five referrals to the CDPP for alleged criminal cartel conduct, which will be heard (either criminally if the CDPP decides to prosecute, or civilly) by the end of 2018. Related to this, Sim highlights the need to impose fines sufficient to deter anti-competitive conduct.</p>
    <p>See </p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/section-46-no-defence-for-uncompetitive-firms" target="_blank">ACCC media release: 'Section 46 no defence for uncompetitive firms' (30 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/populism-and-the-cca" target="_blank">Rod Sims, 'Populism and the CCA' (RBB Economics Conference, 30 November 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dairy Inquiry Interim Report released</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:46:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued its interim report into the dairy industry, making several recommendations, including consideration of a a mandatory code of conduct for the industry 'to address problems caused by bargaining power imbalances between processors and farmers'.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/dairy-inquiry-highlights-power-imbalances-in-supply-chain" title="Dairy Inquiry MR" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/dairy-inquiry/interim-report" target="_blank">Interim Report</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/dairy-inquiry" target="_blank">main inquiry page</a>.</p>
		      <p>See also, eg, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/rod-sims-puts-dairy-players-on-notice-over-lack-of-competition/news-story/97ca44fae69d5a3f5f54f193e6f361ee" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Rod Sims puts dairy players on notice over lack of competition' (The Australian, 30 November 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/agribusiness/dairy/australian-competition-and-consumer-commission-dairy-inquiry-interim-report-released/news-story/9eadd3fe2844d2658388b087ce8a43e6" target="_blank">Simone Smith and Peter Hemphill, 'Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Dairy Inquiry interim report released' (The Weekly Times, 30 November 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC concerned about Moly-Cop's proposed acquisition of Donhad</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:46:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has issued a Statement of Issues in relation to Moly-Cop's proposed acquisition of Donhad. The ACCC's preliminary concerns centre on the extent of competition that currently exists between the two companies and it is investigating 'the extent to which customers would be able to switch to using imports in response to any attempt to increase prices'.</p>
		      <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-raises-concerns-about-moly-cops-proposed-acquisition-of-donhad" title="Donhand MR" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1203650/fromItemId/750991" title="Donhad merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC won't oppose proposed acquisition of OfficeMax by Platinum Equity</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:46:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of OfficeMax Australia by Platinum Equity. Although the ACCC considers the merger will lessen competition it does not believe competition will be 'substantially' lessened, describing the decision as 'finely balanced'.</p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-proposed-acquisition-of-officemax-by-platinum-equity" title="OfficeMax PE MR" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204628/fromItemId/751046" title="Platinum Equity register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC warns against anti-competitive conduct in response to Amazon entry</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:46:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian Financial Review reports on the ACCC's concerns about potential anti-competitive conduct from retailers designed to limit the impact of Amazon's entry.</p>
              <p>See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/retail/accc-warns-against-anticompetitive-behaviour-as-amazon-looms-20171129-gzv5pm" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell, 'ACCC warns against anti-competitive behaviour as Amazon looms' (AFR, 29 November 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise coordination between Jetstar's Asian brands</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:45:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to 're-authorise, for a further five years, coordination involving three Asian based Jetstar branded joint ventures: Jetstar Asia, Jetstar Pacific, and Jetstar Japan.'</p>
		      <p>ACCC commissioner, Roger Featherston, said that the ACCC considers that the coordination, which allows Jetstar branded airlines to operate as a single fully integrated organisation in relation to things like scheduling, sales, marketing and pricing, is likely to result in public benefits and is likely to result in 'little, if any' detriment due to a lessening of competition.</p>
		      <p>The ACCC has invited submissions on the draft determination (no deadline is given).</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/qantas-airways-limited-jetstar-airways-pty-ltd" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-coordination-to-continue-between-jetstars-asian-brands" title="ACCC Jetstar" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TWU authorisations for collective bargaining with Toll</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:45:20 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has granted authorisations to the SA/NT Branch of the Transport Workers Union of Australia 'to allow owner drivers contracted to Toll Transport Pty Ltd (Toll) in metropolitan Adelaide, and in the Whyalla region, to engage in voluntary collective bargaining with Toll until 15 December 2022.'</p>
    <p>This follows a <a href="#tollpropose">draft determination in September </a>in which the ACCC announced the proposed to authorise the collective bargaining conduct.</p>
    <p>Details about the two separate authorisations can be found on the ACCC's public register</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202652/">Adelaide application</a> </li>
      <li><a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202726/">Whyalla application</a></li>
    </ul>
    <p>Apparently it wasn't exciting enough for a media release, so you can find the announcement on the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-grants-two-authorisations-to-the-transport-workers-union-of-australia" target="_blank">ACCC's 'Updates' page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon set to launch</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:44:34 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/amazonlaunch.png" alt="Amazon Christmas" width="250" height="133" class="alignleft"/>Following a soft launch this afternoon, its' reported Amazon will fully launch in Australia tomorrow. For some thoughts on what this means for retail competition see:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/stephen-bartholomeusz/amazon-the-moment-of-truth-has-arrived/news-story/14ed49c49fe597f9124b864a5bbcfa4e" target="_blank">Stephen Bartholomeusz, 'Amazon: the moment of truth has arrived' (The Australian Business Review, 23 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.cmo.com.au/blog/food-thought/2017/11/22/the-competitive-advantage-australian-retailers-have-over-amazon/" target="_blank">Joel Milligan, 'The competitive advantage Australian retailers have over Amazon' (CMO, 22 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/business/retail/amazon-australia-looks-like-its-about-to-launch-20171121-gzq9ak" target="_blank">Simon Thomsen, 'Amazon Australia looks like it's about to launch' (AFR, 22 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com.au/retailers-most-at-risk-from-amazon-australia-2017-11" target="_blank">Chris Pash, 'The Australian retailers most at risk from Amazon' (Business Insider Australia, 22 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-23/woolworths-ready-to-battle-amazon-ahead-of-australian-launch/9186480" target="_blank">Sue Lannin, 'Woolworths to ramp up online services as Amazon prepares for Australian launch' (ABC News, 23 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.cnet.com/au/news/welcome-to-the-jungle-what-to-expect-from-amazon-australia/" target="_blank">Claire Reilly, 'Welcome to the Jungle: What to expect from Amazon Australia' (c|net, 22 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/business/prime-site/amazon-australia-site-retailers-with-certain-strengths-can-survive/news-story/4748843cd813dfa1b98e0b9fb7f56ca0" target="_blank">Chris Herde, 'Amazon Australian site: Retailers with certain strengths can survive' (The Courier-Mail, 23 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.powerretail.com.au/news/will-amazon-impact-australia/" target="_blank">Prinitha Govender, 'How Will Amazon Impact Australia?' (PowerRetail, 23 November 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5110057/Amazon-s-Australian-launch-change-shopping-forever.html" target="_blank">Stephen Gibbs and Sam McPhee, 'It's started! How Amazon will change Australian shopping forever - and consumers will be the BIG winners' (Daily Mail, 23 November 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC has busy week ahead</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:44:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In his regular column, <em>The Australian's </em>John Durie highlights the busy week ahead for the ACCC, including:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>Interim report or <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/dairy-inquiry" target="_blank">Dairy Inquiry</a> (30 Nov)</li>
      <li>Decision due on <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200605/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths' petrol retail sites</a> (30 Nov)</li>
      <li>Decision due on <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1201892/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Platinum Equity's proposed acquisition of OfficeMax Australia</a> (30 Nov)</li>
    </ul>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/busy-week-ahead-for-consumer-watchdog-accc/news-story/cf3428afdbf0fa6a214be09c9eedbb34" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Busy week ahead for consumer watchdog ACCC' (The Australian, 23 November 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises establishment of joint energy purchasing group</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:43:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC will allow businesses in the Eastern Energy Buying Group to establish a joint energy purchasing group and run joint tender processes for electricity and gas for 11 years</p>
    <p>View<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-agribusinesses-to-jointly-purchase-energy" title="MR Agri" target="_blank"> ACCC media release</a>.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/public-registers/authorisations-and-notifications-registers/authorisations-register/the-eastern-energy-buyers-group-authorisations-a91594-a91595" title="Auth agri" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Information the key to read meat competition</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:42:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Commissioner, Mick Keogh, spoke to the MLA Red Meat Industry Forum in Alice Springs today. He highlighted concerns about transparency and future competitiveness of the cattle industry and referenced the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/cattle-and-beef-market-study-final-report" target="_blank">ACCC's Cattle and Beef Market Study</a> which recommended improving market information in order to improve competitiveness.</p>
    <p>View<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/reliable-information-is-essential-to-red-meat-industry-productivity-accc" target="_blank"> ACCC media release</a>.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/information-is-the-key-to-red-meat-competition-productivity-and-growth" target="_blank">speech</a>.</p>
  <]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal approves Tabcorp merger ... again</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:00:59 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Tribunal has granted authorisation to Tabcorp <em>again</em>, after the first authorisation was successfully challenged on judicial review earlier this year.</p>
    <p>Justice Middleton said that the propsoed merger was likely to result in a substantial benefit.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/gambling/tabcorp-11b-deal-for-tatts-given-green-light-again-20171116-gzn68q" target="_blank">John Stensholt and Patrick Durkin, 'Tabcorp $11b deal for Tatts given green light again' (AFR, 17 November 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>e-Collusion and the ACCC's approach to colluding robots!</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:00:39 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has delivered a speech at the conference, 'Can robots collude?', discussing the threats and opportunities posed by algorithms and big data.</p>
    <p>Sims observes that current laws, particularly with the Harper amendments relating to misuse of market power and concerted practices, can deal with the 'predictable agent' and 'autonomous machine' scenarios identified by <a href="http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674545472" target="_blank">Stucke and Ezrachi</a> involving robot collusion <em>where the substantially lessen competition</em>. In particular:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p> the new concerted practices prohibition should help shift the focus away from a requirement to establish a &ldquo;meeting of the minds&rdquo; to consider whether there has been cooperation between competing businesses that substantially lessens competition.</p>
      <p>If robots are colluding, this provision will help us stop this conduct.</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>View speech: <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/the-accc%E2%80%99s-approach-to-colluding-robots" target="_blank">The ACCC's approach to colluding robots</a></p>
    <p>View media release: <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/new-competition-laws-a-protection-against-big-data-e-collusion" target="_blank">'New competition lass a protection against big data e-collusion'</a></p>
    <p>See also <a href="https://www.gtlaw.com.au/insights/can-robots-collude" target="_blank">'Can Robots Collude?' (Gilbert+Tobin Insights, 16 November 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/technology/rod-sims-you-cant-blame-a-robot-20171116-gzmnt0" target="_blank">James Eyers, 'Rod Sims: You can't blame a robot' (AFR, 16 November 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/big-data-and-machine-learning-algorithms-could-increase-risk-of-collusion-accc/" target="_blank">Tas Bindi, 'Big data and machine learning algorithms could increase risk of collusion: ACCC' (ZDNet, 16 November 2017)</a>.</p>
    <p>If video is your thing, you may also be interested in: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8NMvBT1J2E" target="_blank">'Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy' (Maurice Stucke, speech to The Berkman Klein Center for Internet &amp; Society', March 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC won't oppose proposed acquisition of OfficeMax by Complete Office Supplies</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:00:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of OfficeMax by Complete Office Supplies.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-proposed-acquisition-of-officemax-by-complete-office-supplies" title="OfficeMax PR" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204448/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">Office Supplies Pty Ltd merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases its latest ACCCount and self-assessment report and updates its website to reflect the Harper Reforms</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:50:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has released its second<strong> self-assessment report </strong>(2016-2017) measuring the agency against the Government's <a href="https://www.cuttingredtape.gov.au/resources/rpf" target="_blank">Regulator Performance Framework</a> (including <a href="https://www.cuttingredtape.gov.au/resources/rpf/kpis" target="_blank">six outcome-based KPIs</a>)</p>
    <p>When releasing the report ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, noted that the report highlighted areas for continued improvement, including 'clearer guidance for businesses on our processes for regulatory actions and investigations' and noted that a key challenge is to communicate the limits of the ACCC's role. Notwithstanding the challenges, Sims noted that most stakeholders had a 'positive view' of the ACCC's performance and perceptions had generally 'improved since last financial year'.</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-second-self-assessment-against-the-regulator-performance-framework" title="MR Self Assessment" target="_blank">media release</a></p>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-regulator-performance-framework-self-assessment-report/accc-regulator-performance-framework-self-assessment-report-2016-17" target="_blank">ACCC Regulator Performance Framework self-assessment report 2016-17</a></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>The ACCC has also published its latest <strong>'ACCCount'</strong> detailing the ACCC's recent activities.</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/acccount/acccount-1-july-to-30-september-2017" target="_blank">ACCount 1 July to 30 September 2017</a></p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>The<strong> <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/" target="_blank">ACCC's website</a></strong> has also had a bit of a face lift which is freaking me out a little ... I was just adapting the logo change! The face lift (which is not too drastic) coincides with a significant update to the site to reflect the Harper reforms. For example, there are now new pages, like the '<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1065373" target="_blank">Resale Price Maintenance notifications register</a>' (pretty boring at this stage though with no notifications), the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/business/anti-competitive-behaviour/misuse-of-market-power" target="_blank">misuse of market power page</a> has been updated and the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/business/anti-competitive-behaviour/anti-competitive-conduct" target="_blank">anti-competitive page</a> now incorporates reference the concerted practices prohibition. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Reforms overview</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:49:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>For an overview of the Harper Reforms now in force, see my <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/hottopics/harperreforms.html">Harper Reforms page</a>.</p>
    <p>The website is being progressively updated to account for the reforms.</p>
    <p>For more detail see the two Acts introducing the changes with associated links and commentary:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Act 2017</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Act 2017</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Reforms </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:49:24 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Law firms have started posting their updates on the Harper reforms following their commencement yesterday.</p>
    <p>Leading the charge is <a href="https://www.allens.com.au/services/comp/harpindex.htm" target="_blank">Allens &gt;&lt; Linklaters which has a very neat infographic</a>, setting out the key reforms and their implications (as well as other more detailed information)</p>
    <p>There's also a media release from Treasurer Scott Morrison announcing the commencement: <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/112-2017/" target="_blank">'Aussie small business and consumers the winners as strengthened competition laws commence' (6 November 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Reforms commence</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:17:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>A date for commencement has been proclaimed and the Acts <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Act 2017</a> and <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Act 2017</a> commence on 6 November 2017 - TODAY!</p>
              <ul>
                <li><strong><a href="https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017N00085" target="_blank">View proclamation</a></strong>              </li>
              </ul>
              <p>The main Harper Reforms were set to commence on a date fixed by proclamation or (if no earlier date is fixed) the day after six months from the date the <a href="legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Act 2017</a> passed (which would have been 28 April 2018). But, on Thursday the Governor-General proclaimed 6 November 2017 as the commencement date.</p>
              <p>Fun fact: Part 3 of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/1995cpra.html"><em>Competition Policy Reform Act 1995</em></a> was proclaimed to commence this day 22 years ago; 6 November 1995. That included commencement of the ACCC (replacing the TPC). Happy Birthday ACCC.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New regulations</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:16:46 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>New <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017L01431" target="_blank"><em>Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Regulations 2017 </em></a>have now been made and registered. </p>
		      <p>The amendments follow the passage of the main Harper Reforms last month.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on the upcoming 5G auction</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:16:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[      <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has welcomed the upcoming auction of 5G, but has also flagged some competition concerns in a speech delivered at the RadComms conference today. Sims concluded his speech with:</p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p>“... we want the full benefits of 5G to be realised, and we want these benefits to be realised by all Australians through a competitive market.”</p>
	          </blockquote>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-welcomes-5g-but-flags-competition-issues" title="Media release 5G" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
		      <p>View speech: <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/evolution-or-revolution-why-competition-matters-for-5g" target="_blank">Sims, 'Evolution or revolution? Why competition matters for 5G' (Speech at RadComms 2017, 1 November 2017)</a></p>
		      <p>See also: <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/accc-urges-cap-on-5g-spectrum/news-story/4c07dc69f6899e5522724742968b2034" target="_blank">Supratim Adhikari, 'ACCC urges cap on 5G spectrum' (The Australian, 1 November 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/accc-pushes-holistic-spectrum-ownership-ahead-of-5g/" target="_blank">Corinne Reichert, 'ACCC pushes 'holistic' spectrum ownership ahead of 5G' (ZD Net, 1 November 2017)</a> and <a href="https://www.choice.com.au/electronics-and-technology/internet/connecting-to-the-internet/articles/looming-5g-could-substitute-nbn-internet-accc-311017" target="_blank">Tony Ibrahim, 'ACCC warns 5G could substitute NBN connections' (Choice, 31 October 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Media Merger Guidelines</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:40:09 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC today released updated Media Merger Guidelines which take account of recent reforms to media ownership laws. These replace the 2006 guidelines. See  <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-updated-media-merger-guidelines" target="_blank">MMG Media Release</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/media-merger-guidelines-2017" target="_blank">Guidelines</a>.</p>
              <p>This follows a speech yesterday to the Communications and Media Law Association (CAMLA) delivered by ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, on the 'ACCC's role in the changing media landscape' (see <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/acccs-role-in-the-changing-media-landscape" title="MR media" target="_blank">media release</a> | the speech has not been published)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Container Stevedoring monitoring report released</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:39:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released its annual Container stevedoring monitoring report 2016-2017. </p>
		      <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated:</p>
		      <blockquote>
		        <p>&ldquo;Competition has significantly increased in recent years with the introduction of a third stevedore in Sydney and Brisbane, and now we can add Melbourne to that list. As such, we expect to see greater levels of price competition as new entrants and incumbents compete for market share,&rdquo; ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.</p>
	          </blockquote>
		      <p>See  <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/recent-new-entrants-will-increase-competition-at-container-ports" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Acts receive Royal Assent</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:39:10 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The main Harper Bill - the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer (Competition Policy Reform) Bill 2017</a> received Royal Assent last Friday, 27 October 2017. The main provisions come into operation the day after six months from receiving Royal Assent, unless an earlier date is proclaimed. Subject to the fixing of an earlier date it will come into operation on 28 April 2018.</p>
		      <p>On 30 October the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits) Act 2017</a> also received Royal Assent.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks comment on voluntary code for pop-up shops</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:38:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a draft determination 'proposing to grant re-authorisation to the Shopping Centre Council of Australia Ltd (SCCA) for its Casual Mall Licensing Code of Practice'.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-comment-on-voluntary-code-for-pop-up-shops" title="Pop Up MR" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
		      <p>See  <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1203107/fromItemId/278039" title="Pop up authorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Communications sector market study: draft report</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:38:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC today published its draft report on its market study of the communications sector.</p>
		      <p>The ACCC is <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/communications-1/communications-sector-market-study-draft-report/" target="_blank">seeking comments until 8 December 2017</a>. A final report is expected early 2018.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-extensive-report-on-communications-market" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>
		      <p>See <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/icons/pdficonsm.png" width="15" height="15" alt=""/><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Communications%20Sector%20Market%20Study%20Draft%20Report.pdf" target="_blank"> report</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Report on Australia's Food and Grocery Code of Conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:38:05 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>A report on Australia's Food and Grocery Code of Conduct has been published by Caron Beaton-Wells and Jo Paul-Taylor. The report follows research conducted over two years, funded by an ARC grant. Two key questions guided the research:</p>
		      <ol>
		        <li>What were the problems to which the FGCC was responding and why and how was the FGCC responsive to or seen as likely to address them?</li>
		        <li>To what extent has the FGCC been effective to date or is it likely to be effective in the future in addressing such problems?</li>
	          </ol>
		      <p>The release of the report coincided with a public symposium, '<a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/engagement/supermarket-power-in-australia" target="_blank">Supermarket Power in Australia: Looking Back and Ahead</a>', organised by Melbourne Law School and hosted at the State Library of Victoria on Friday.</p>
		      <p>The 248 page report can be downloaded from the Competition Law and Economics Network's website, here:</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen#codereport" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells and Jo Paul-Taylor, 'Codifying Supermarket-Supplier Relations: A Report on Australia's Food and Grocery Code of Conduct' (Supermarket Project, Melbourne Law School, September 2017)</a></li>
	          </ul>
		      <p>More information about the <a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/research/supermarket-project" target="_blank">Supermarket Project can be found on its website</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Saputo/Murray Goulburn deal unveiled</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:37:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In a deal worth AU $1.3 billion, Canadian company, Saputo, is set to acquire Murray Goulburn's assets, making it Australia's largest milk processor. The deal will require approval from the ACCC and the Foreign Investment Review Board and is subject to approval by an ordinary resolution of MG's voting shareholders.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://www.saputo.com/en/Investors/Newsroom/Newsroom-Detail?link=http://saputo.mwnewsroom.com/article/xml?id=2193400" target="_blank">Saputo Media Release: Saputo Inc Announces an Agreement to Acquire the Business of Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co Limited</a> and <a href="http://www.mgc.com.au/media/49638/20171027-asx-announcement-mg-sale-to-saputo.pdf" target="_blank">Murray Goulburn ASX Announcement</a>.</p>
		      <p>See also:</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/saputo-snaps-up-murray-goulburn-assets-in-13bn-deal/news-story/1c79712eef8ba495d87393bae0cde5d8" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Saputo snaps up Murray Goulburn assets in $1.3bn deal' (The Australian, 27 October 2017)</a></li>
		        <li>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/street-talk/canadas-saputo-to-snare-murray-goulburn-20171026-gz8m15" target="_blank">Sarah Thompson, Anthony Macdonald, Joyce Moulakis, 'Canada's Saputo to snare Murray Goulburn' (AFR, 26 October 2017)</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2017-10-27/canadian-dairy-giant-saputo-to-buy-murray-goulburn/9083574" target="_blank">Clint Jasper, 'Murray Goulburn dairy processor set to be bought by Canadian company Saputo for $1.3 billion' (ABC Rural, 27 October 2017)</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/murray-goulburn-to-be-sold-to-canadas-saputo-for-13b-20171026-gz9aav.html" target="_blank">Darren Gray, 'Farmers slam $1.3billion sale of Murray Goulburn to Canada's Saputo' (SMH, 27 October 2017)</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/agribusiness/dairy/murray-goulburn-to-be-sold-to-saputo-for-13-billion/news-story/e47725cb4646624f524ce878895968da" target="_blank">Peter Hemphill and Simone Smith, 'Murray Goulburn to be sold to Saputo for $1.3 billion' (The Weekly Times, 27 October 2017)</a></li>
		      </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Borg's proposed acquisition of CCH Panel's plants</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:37:23 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC had announced that it will not oppose Borg Group's proposed acquisition of CCH Panels' Mount Gambier and Oberon particleboard plants.</p>
		      <p>Borg manufactures and supplies value-added particleboard products; CCH Panels manufactures 'raw particleboard, particleboard flooring and value-added particleboard products' at four plants - the proposed acquisition relates to two of these plants. </p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-borg-chh-panels-proposed-acquisition" target="_blank">ACCC's Borg media release</a> | <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204159/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">Borg merger register</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed Essilor/Luxottica merger</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:36:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC had announced that it will not oppose the proposed merger between Essilor International and Luxottica Group SpA.</p>
		      <p>In Australia Essilor predominantly supplies 'wholesale finished opthalmic lenses', while Luxottica 'largely supplies wholesale prescription frames and sunglasses' and has retail outlets like OPSM and Laubman &amp; Pank. </p>
		      <p>The ACCC notes that these companies mainly supply products at different states in the supply chain and there is 'minimal direct competitive overlap between the two parties'. The ACCC considered on whether the increased vertical integration would substantially lessen competition and, after speaking with market participants, concluded the merged entity would 'likely continue to face competition at every level of the supply chain, including from other vertically integrated suppliers'.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-proposed-essilor-and-luxottica-merger" target="_blank">ACCC's Essilor/Luxottica media release</a> | see <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1204163/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">ACCC's Essilor/Luxottica merger register</a></p>
	        ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases interim guidance on Harper reforms</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:09:47 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has issued the following three 'interim' guidelines addressing some of the key changes that will be brought about by the Harper Reforms</p>
              <ul>
                <li><a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/draft-guidelines-on-concerted-practices-1/" target="_blank">Interim guidelines on concerted practices</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/draft-guidelines-on-section-46-reforms/" target="_blank">Interim guidelines on section 46 reforms</a></li>
                <li><a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/interim-guidelines-mergers-and-authorisations/" target="_blank">Guidelines and interim forms for merger and non-merger authorisations</a></li>
              </ul>
              <p>The ACCC is consulting on these guidelines, with submissions due by 24 November 2017. </p>
              <p>The two interim guidelines follow 'draft frameworks' (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016accc-concerted.html">concerted practices</a> | <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016accc-mmp.html">mmp</a>) released in October 2016 for consultation. Submissions on those consultations have not been made public.</p>
              <p>The section 46 document has been re-ordered a bit, but it is otherwise remarkably similar to the 2016 draft framework. The key change is the addition of 'restricting access to an essential input' and 'loyalty rebates' as types of conduct likely to have a greater potential to involve mmp. Concentration levels in some of the examples have  changed and, in the section detailing the ACCC's approach to investigating alleged MMP, consideration of the 'nature and extent of competitive constraints' has moved from being listed as the fourth factor to the first factor. Not too earth shattering.</p>
              <p>The concerted practices guidance has had a more significant overhaul. There is more detail (beyond just examples) of what might constitute a concerted practice and 'engaging in a concerted practice'. There's also more information and what might constitute having the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition.' Some of the 'examples' of risky conduct from the framework remain, but there are also new examples. The 'priority' factors for ACCC investigation and enforcement are the same, but some additional guidance about issues that may impact on the likelihood of enforcement action have been inserted; they include concerted practices 'considered as part of broader ACCC investigations', evidence 'beyond independent behaviour' and the information recipient's 'response to the receipt of information'. </p>
              <p>See further the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/guidance-for-harper-reforms" title="Harper guidelines" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases annual report</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC's 2016-2017 annual report was tabled in Parliament today.</p>
		      <p>In relation to competition law and policy, the report highlights:</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li>the first criminal cartel case, describing it as a 'watershed moment in Australia's competition law history'<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/10/22/harper-competition-reforms-pass/" target="_blank"></a></li>
		        <li>The Ramsey Health care proceedings alleging misuse of market power and exclusive dealing</li>
		        <li>High Court success in Flight Centre and the Air NZ/Garuda Indonesia cases.</li>
		        <li>Consideration of 288 merger matters (33 publicly reviewed; 16 going on to second phase and half of those not proceeding)</li>
		        <li>Twenty-three authorisations granted; four denied (including Apple Pay)</li>
		        <li>Market studies into 'sectors including new car retailing, dairy, regional petrol prices, and gas and electricity affordability.'</li>
	          </ul>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-2016-17-annual-report" title="Annual report media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. View full <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-aer-annual-report/accc-aer-annual-report-2016-17" target="_blank">copy of the report</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Overview of the Harper reforms</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:39:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Following yesterday's passage of Competition Policy Reform Bill (Harper Bill) last week, I thought it worth re-capping the key changes, including:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>introduction of an effects test for <strong>misuse of market power</strong></li>
      <li>introduction of a new <strong>concerted practices </strong>law</li>
      <li>first instance <strong>merger authorisation </strong>power reverting to the ACCC and introduction of new dual SLC/public interest authorisation test</li>
      <li>extending <strong>joint venture exception </strong>to cartels</li>
      <li>allowing notification for <strong>resale price maintenance</strong></li>
      <li>removing per se prohibition of <strong>third line forcing</strong></li>
      <li>simplification and extension of <strong>authorisation </strong>provisions and introduction of new <strong>class exemption </strong>power</li>
      <li>modification of the <strong>access regime test </strong>(including reversion to natural monopoly test)</li>
    </ul>
    <p>And there's plenty more. For more detail see my <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/10/22/harper-competition-reforms-pass/" target="_blank">blog: 'Harper Competition Reforms Now Passed' (24 October 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not declare domestic mobile roaming</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:39:05 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has decided not to declare domestic mobile roaming. ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, noted that the ACCC's inquiry 'found that declaration would likely not lead to lower prices or better coverage or quality of services for regional Australians'. In addition, he observed that declaration could 'harm the interests of consumers by undermining the incentives of mobile operators to make investments to compete with each other in regional areas'.</p>
    <p>Sims did, however, identify areas where improvements could be made to better deliver outcomes for regional consumers, including better transparency about coverage and more accountability. <em>[without commenting on the merits of the decision, this regional consumer observes that she has received transparent information about coverage - it's really bad! Unfortunately knowing that doesn't help her answer the phone indoors.]</em></p>
    <p>For more, see:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-not-to-declare-mobile-roaming-but-identifies-measures-to-improve-regional-mobile-coverage" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/mobile-services/domestic-mobile-roaming-declaration-inquiry-2016/regional-mobile-issues-paper" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Domestic Mobile Roaming Declaration Inquiry 2016:
        Regional mobile issues paper' (23 October 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/mobile-services/domestic-mobile-roaming-declaration-inquiry-2016/final-report" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Domestic Mobile Roaming Declaration Inquiry 2016' (Final Report, 23 October 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>
    <p>For media see, for example:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/business/telecommunications/accc-rules-no-roaming-but-issues-remain-for-regional-mobile-20171022-gz63ay" target="_blank">Max Mason, 'ACCC rules no roaming, but issues remain for regional mobile' (AFR, 23 October 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/accc-decides-not-to-declare-mobile-roaming/news-story/f206911a4ae6354b5cd2834a5e8bf09b" target="_blank">Supratim Adhikari, 'ACCC decides not to declare mobile roaming' (The Australian, 23 October 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/mobile-domestic-roaming-not-declared-by-accc/" target="_blank">Corinne Reichert, 'Mobile domestic roaming not declared by ACCC' (ZDNet, 22 October 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pharmacists to continue to receive competition protection</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:38:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The government may have accepted the majority of the Harper <em>law </em>reforms, but when it comes to policy reform, they appear have rejected the <a href="reports/2015harper-recs.html">Harper recommendation</a> (14) to remove current restrictions on ownership and location. This recommendation was 'noted' by the Government in their<a href="https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-response.html" target="_blank"> response to the Harper Report</a>.</p>
    <p>For more see <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/bitter-pill-for-consumers-as-pharmacists-win-protection-from-competition-20171019-gz44cb" target="_blank">Andrew Tillett, 'Bitter pill for consumers as pharmacists win protection from competition' (AFR, 19 October 2017)</a>.</p>
    <p>See also: <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5988%22" target="_blank">National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits - Budget and Other Measures) Bill 2017</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper law reforms pass; time to move on Harper policy recommendations</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:38:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Following yesterday's passage of the reforms to competition law recommended in the 2015 Harper Report, John Durie reports that Treasurer Scott Morrison is set to unveil a productivity reform package next week which will include many of the broader policy recommendations set out in the Harper Report. </p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/individuals-to-be-target-of-productivity-reforms/news-story/8064b6c8133ab5d8d8f11c1d3e944315" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Individuals to be target of productivity reforms' (The Australian, 18 October 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC welcomes 'new era in competition law'</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:04:22 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>Following the passage of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> (Harper Bill) the ACCC has issued a press release welcoming a 'new era in competition law. </p>
    <p>The passage of this bill also means that the misuse of market power changes, which passed in August but were contingent on the passage of the Harper bill, will also come into operation.</p>
    <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>'I am pleased to see these important reforms pass through the Parliament. The reforms to the misuse of market power prohibition and the new prohibition of anti-competitive concerted practices will improve our ability to target conduct harming the Australian economy.' </p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Chairman Sims also welcomes the reforms to merger authorisation and clearance, particularly topical in light of the Tabcorp authorisation sage. </p>
    <p>The media release goes on to state that the ACCC has established a 'Substantial Lessening of Competition Unit (SLC Unit), which will be responsible for misuse of market power and concerted practices investigations and litigation within the ACCC' and that this unit will soon release Guidance on the MMP and concerted practices provisions (draft guidance on each has previously been released for comment).</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-welcomes-new-era-in-competition-law" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>House agrees to Senate Harper amendment</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:03:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Well that was quick!</p>
    <p>The House of Representatives this morning considered the Senate's amendment to the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> (Harper Bill) (removal of schedule 6 relating to secondary boycott penalties). </p>
    <p>Senator Morrison moved that the amendment be passed moved that the amendment be agreed to. Dr Leigh spoke briefly, following which the motion was agreed.</p>
    <p>The Harper bill has now passed both Houses.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>House to consider Harper bill this morning</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:32:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> (Harper Bill) passed the Senate with amendment (removal of schedule 6 relating to secondary boycott penalties) on Monday. </p>
    <p>It is listed as the first bill for consideration in the House this morning.</p>
   <p>Senator Morrison moved that the amendment be passed.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Uber economy and the role of competition law</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:32:14 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Terrific seminar today, by Dr Victoria Daskalova on '<a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/engagement/discussion-group" target="_blank">Regulating the New Self-Employed in the Uber Economy: What Role for Competition Law?</a>'. </p>
    <p>The seminar was jointly hosed by the <a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen" target="_blank">Competition Law and Economics Network</a> and the <a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/celrl" target="_blank">Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law</a> at the Melbourne Law School.</p>
    <p>A copy of Victoria's paper (Regulating the New Self-Employed in the Uper Economy: What Role for EU Competition Law?) can be accessed at <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009120" target="_blank">SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009120</a>.  </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Three competition bills before Parliament today</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:46:27 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> (Harper Bill) was back in the Senate today and passed with the expected amendment to schedule 6 (removal of the increased penalties for secondary boycotts). It now returns to the House. The House received a message from the Senate this evening and it was moved that the amendment be considered at the next sitting.</p>
    <p>Also up for debate in the Senate was the Government's <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a> which passed without amendments. <a href="https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/LimitedMeritsReview/Report" target="_blank">A report on this Bill</a> by the Senate was also tabled and recommended passage of the Bill. It has now passed both Houses.</p>
    <p>Meanwhile in the House the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017mmp-access.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment (Small Business Access to Justice) Bill 2017</a> was read for a second time and debate adjourned.  </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC's electricity report released</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:27:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has published a preliminary report into the electricity market and generated quite a stir.</p>
		      <p>See media release: <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/electricity-report-details-affordability-competition-issues" target="_blank">'Electricity report details affordability, competition issues' (ACCC, 16 October 2017)</a></p>
		      <p><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-retail-electricity-pricing-inquiry-preliminary-report" target="_blank">View  Retail Electricity Pricing Inquiry preliminary report</a></p>
		      <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/energy/electricity-supply-prices-inquiry/preliminary-report" target="_blank">Electricity supply prices inquiry</a> home page.</p>
		      <p>See plenty of media. For example:</p>
		      <ul>
		        <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/news/accc-blames-big-three-market-power-for-price-hikes-20171014-gz156f" target="_blank">Andrew Tillett, 'ACCC blames 'big three' market power for price hikes' (AFR, 16 October 2017)</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/as-sims-fumes-a-new-energy-venture-blooms/news-story/2d34fcee131a50aac0db9a9138989bf9" target="_blank">John Durie, 'As Sims fumes, a new energy venture blooms' (The Australian, 16 October 2017)</a></li>
		        <li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-biggest-and-saddest-problem-with-the-acccs-new-report-on-energy-prices-is-we-knew-its-findings-5-years-ago-2017-10" target="_blank">Simon Thomsen, 'The biggest and saddest problem with the ACCC's new report on energy prices is we knew its findings 5 years ago' (Business Insider Australia, 16 October 2017)</a></li>
		        <li><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/cet-not-targeted-in-cccs-report-into-energy-price-rises/9055538" target="_blank">Stephen Long 'CET not targetted in ACCC's report into energy price rises' (ABC PM, 16 October 2017)</a> (audio 5mins)</li>
	          </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition bills back in Parliament next week</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:49:24 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> (Harper Bill) will be back in the Senate Monday and is expected to pass. However, given debate in the House (which focussed almost exclusively on the secondary boycott changes) it is likely an amendment will be proposed to schedule 6. This schedule proposes to increase the penalties for secondary boycotts significantly in order to align the penalty with other breaches of the competition laws. Any such a amendment has a good chance of succeeding in the Senate; there appears to be bipartisan support for the rest of the bill.</p>
    <p>Also up for debate when Parliament resumes is the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017mmp-access.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment (Small Business Access to Justice) Bill 2017</a> (Private members bill) which passed the Senate on 13 August 2017; on Monday it will come befor ethe House for debate at around 10:30am.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow joing purchasing of energy by Eastern Energy Buyers Group members</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:48:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a 'draft determination proposing to allow businesses in the new Eastern Energy Buyers Group (EEBG) to run joint tender processes for electricity and gas' for a period of 11 years. The proposed joint tender process covers electricity, gas and gas transport services. </p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-agribusinesses-joint-purchasing-of-energy" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1203232/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition in the Australian economy: too little of a good thing</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:47:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <iframe style="padding: 0 10px 0 0;"  src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/237668804" width="250" height="141" frameborder="0" class="alignleft" webkitallowfullscreen="webkitallowfullscreen" mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><p>The recording of last week's Grattan Institute's Policy Pitch event, featuring <a href="experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Prof Caron Beaton-Wells</a> and <a href="experts/king-stephen.html">Dr Stephen King</a>, with Jim Minifie as moderator, is now available. </p>
    <p>The panel discussion included consideration of the following questions (and more): </p>
    <ul>
      <li>'How valid are concerns about competition and market power in Australia?</li>
      <li>Where is competition working less well than it could, and what are its limits as a policy tool? </li>
      <li>What else should policymakers do to ensure competition benefits the community?'</li>
    </ul>
    <p>View <a href="https://vimeo.com/237668804" target="_blank">Vimeo page</a>: <a href="https://vimeo.com/237668804">Competition in the Australian economy: too little of a good thing? &ndash; Melbourne</a> from <a href="https://vimeo.com/user8853932">Grattan Institute</a> on <a href="https://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
  ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reasons published in Cement Australia penalty appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:47:19 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The reasons for judgment have been published in relation to the ACCC's appeal against penalty in the Cement Australia case.</p>
    <p>The reasons can be found on the <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2017/2017fcafc0159" target="_blank">Federal Court page</a>. Although the appeal related only to penalty, the reasons for judgment run to 226 pages (633 paragraphs)</p>
    <p>The trial judge had imposed penalties of $17.1m; this has been increased to a total of $20.6m. The <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-cement-australia-level-of-penalties" target="_blank">ACCC had sought an increase to a fine of more than $90 million</a>.</p>
    <p>See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013cement.html">my case page (Cement Australia)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lack of competition driving up petrol prices</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:46:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released findings of its study into the Brisbane petrol market. The report shows Brisbane petrol prices are significantly higher than the rest of the country; the cause, says the ACCC, is  lack of competition.</p>
    <p>See:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/lack-of-competition-driving-high-brisbane-petrol-prices" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Lack of competition driving high Brisbane petrol prices' (Press Release, 9 October 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/petrol-market-studies/report-on-the-brisbane-petrol-market" target="_blank">ACCC, <em>Report on the Brisbane petrol market </em>(9 October 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>
    <p>See also </p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/accc-reports-bowser-chiefs-draining-city-motorists-dry-with-greedy-retailers-ripping-us-off-by-50m-a-year/news-story/eba3a96d903c580376ee2f6dcf2a7f20" target="_blank">Daryl Passmore, 'ACCC reports bowser chiefs draining city motorists dry with greedy retailers ripping us off by $50m a year' (The Courier Mail, 9 October 2017)</a></li>
      <li> <a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/editorial-watchdog-describes-brisbanes-fuel-cycle-as-baffling/news-story/bdfb1c3bd742213e7c277f470171e827" target="_blank">'Editorial: Watchdog describes Brisbane's fuel cycle as baffling' (The Courier Mail, 9 October 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://live.racq.com.au/2017/10/brisbane-drivers-mercy-price-gouging-servos/" target="_blank">RACQ, 'Brisbane drivers at mercy of price gouging servos' (9 October 2017)</a>.</li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on media mergers</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:46:38 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In an interview with the AFR on the recent media reforms, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has noted the complications asssociated with the growth of online news. </p>
    <p>The focus of any merger review would be the 'closeness of competition', with Sims describing markets as 'like a cascading series of concentric circles'.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/media-and-marketing/tv/media-mergers-not-clearcut-in-world-of-online-competition-accc-boss-rod-sims-20171006-gyvqe8" target="_blank">Max Mason, 'Media mergers not clear-cut in world of online competition: ACCC box Rod Sims' (AFR, 6 October 2017).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wants more information on Esso-BHP drop in gas output</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:45:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has indictated the ACCC will be looking into Esso and BHP's drop in gas output from its Bass Straight joint venture.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/held-to-ransom-essobhp-gas-production-drop-to-be-examined-by-accc-20171006-gyvipz.html" target="_blank">Peter Hannam, '&quot;Held to ransom&quot;: Esso-BHP gas production drop to be examined by ACCC' (SMH, 7 October 2017)</a></p>
    <p>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/agl-energy-again-in-firing-line-as-accc-widens-crackdown-on-gas-20171004-gyukps" target="_blank">Angela Macdonald-Smith, 'AGL Energy in the firing line again as ACCC widens crackdown on gas' (AFR, 5 October 2017)</a></p>
  ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$20.6 million penalties ordered against Cement Australia companies for anti-competitive conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:30:46 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The full Federal Court has upheld an appeal by the ACCC for increased penalties in the Concrete Australia case.</p>
    <p>The trial judge had imposed penalties of $17.1m; this has been increased to a total of $20.6m. The <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-cement-australia-level-of-penalties" target="_blank">ACCC had sought an increase to a fine of more than $90 million</a>.</p>
    <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stressed the importance of high penalties in deterring anti-competitive conduct and announced the ACCC would 'continue to make submissions to the courts for higher penalties to be imposed for anti-competitive conduct'.</p>
    <p>The ACCC first brought this case in 2008; it took until 2014 for an initial decision and a further 2+ years for a penalty decision. The appeal against penalty was filed in June 2016 and heard in February this year.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/full-federal-court-orders-206million-penalties-against-cement-australia-companies" target="_blank">ACCC media release (Cement Australia)</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013cement.html">my case page (Cement Australia)</a>.</p>
    <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-falls-short-in-abuse-of-market-power-test-case/news-story/8124527d1ab122d6e16838f7c8c01239" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC falls short in abuse of market power test case' (The Australian, 5 October 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tabcorp re-applies for authorisation: timelines set</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:02:35 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Tabcorp formally re-applied for authorisation to acquire Tatts on Friday. The application is now available on the Tribunal website (it usefully appears as a marked up version of the original).</p>
              <p>Directions hearings were held by Justice Middleton on Monday and Tuesday. The following timelines were established:</p>
<ul>
            <li><strong>Friday 6 October: </strong>parties and interveners to serve any new evidence arising since 2 June </li>
                <li><strong>Monday 9 October: </strong>submissions and supporting materials by third parties due </li>
            <li><strong>Friday 13 October: </strong>the ACCC to file a report pursuant to s 95AZEA and any further evidence </li>
            <li><strong>Tuesday 17 October: </strong>replies to be submitted</li>
            <li><strong>Friday 20 October: </strong>other written submissions due</li>
            <li><strong>Monday 23 October: </strong>other written replies due</li>
            <li><strong>Tuesday 24 - Wednesday 25 October: </strong>hearing (if needed)</li>
            </ul>
              <p>Justice Middleton also granted Tatts, CrownBet, the Racing Victoria Interveners and Racing.com leave to intervene, ordered that the evidence filed in the first Tabcorp application would stand as evidence in the new application and ordered that third party submissions filed in that proceeding would stand as submissions in the new proceedings (subject to the parties withdrawing the submissions). Rules regarding confidentiality were also established. </p>
              <p>See <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/current-matters/tribunal-documents/act-3-2017" target="_blank">Application by Tabcorp Holdings Limited (No 2)</a> (ACT 3 of 2017)</p>
              <p>See also <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/current-matters/tribunal-documents/act-1-2017" title="Cinema authorisation register" target="_blank">Application by Tabcorp Holdings Limited</a> (ACT 1 of 2017)</p>
              <p>See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">my Tabcorp merger page for further details</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC delays ruling on BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths' retail service stations</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:26:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has pushed back the date for its anticipated final determination in the BP from 26 October until 30 November.</p>
    <p>The ACCC issued a statement of issues on 10 August. Today it pushed back the proposed announcement date in order to 'allow more time for data analysis, and to consider information provided by parties and market participants.'</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-delays-final-ruling-on-bp-woolworths-deal/news-story/c8ca2cf30b034c8337b89602618d3ab5" target="_blank">Samantha Woodhill, 'ACCC delays final ruling on BP, Woolworths deal' (The Australian, 4 October 2017)</a></p>
    <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200605/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC Merger Register (BP)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dairy Inquiry reporting date pushed back</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Oct 2017 11:26:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The date for final reporting of the ACCC's <a href="http://www.bordermail.com.au/story/4967869/accc-delays-final-report-into-dairy-industry-until-april-30/" target="_blank"></a> inquiry into competitiveness of prices, trading practices and supply chain in the Australian dairy industry has been pushed back by five months. The interim report is now expected to be released in November and final report is due 30 April 2018.</p>
    <p>See, <a href="http://www.bordermail.com.au/story/4967869/accc-delays-final-report-into-dairy-industry-until-april-30/" target="_blank">John Chanter, 'ACCC delays final report into dairy industry until April 30' (The Border Mail, 5 October 2017)</a>.</p>
    <p>See ACCC<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/dairy-inquiry" target="_blank"> Dairy Inquiry</a> page</p>
  ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise independent cinemas to collectively bargain</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:02:14 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has issued a draft determination proposing to grant authorisation to Independent Cinemas Australia (ICA), and its current and future independent cinema members, to share information and collectively bargain with film distributors.'</p>
		      <p>Interested parties can make submissions until 20 October, with a final determination expected in December.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-independent-cinemas-to-bargain-collectively" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202578/fromItemId/278039" title="Cinema authorisation register" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise TWU owner drivers to collectively bargain</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:02:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'proposes to grant authorisation, for five years, to the Transport Workers Union of Australia SA/NT Branch' to enable owner drivers contracted to Toll 'in metropolitan Adelaide, and in Whyalla, to engage in voluntary collective bargaining with Toll.' A final decision is expected in November. Submissions on the draft determination can be made until 13 October.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-transport-workers-union-owner-drivers-to-collectively-bargain" title="ACCC update TWU" target="_blank">ACCC update</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202652/" target="_blank">authorisation register (Adelaide)</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202726/" target="_blank">authorisation register (Whyalla)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises eRx Script Exchange revenue sharing agreement</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:01:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has dissed a final determination 'granting authorisation to eRx Script Exchange Pty Ltd to continue to give effect to an interoperability arrangement that involves revenue sharing with IP MDS Pty Ltd until 30 June 2020.'</p>
		      <p>This is consistent with a draft determination issued in August.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-re-authorises-erx-script-exchange-to-continue-revenue-sharing-arrangement-0" target="_blank">ACCC update</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202132/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Camp Australia withdraws merger clearance application</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:00:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
		      <p>Camp Australia and Junior Adventures Group have withdrawn their request for ACCC merger clearance.</p>
		      <p>ACCC commenced its informal review on 1 June 201 and later released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER17+10446.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1203806&amp;trimFileName=MER17+10446.pdf" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> expressing some competition concerns.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/camp-australia-junior-adventures-group-withdraw-merger-application" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1203805/fromItemId/751046" title="Camp Australia merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>
		      <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/dataroom/merger-plans-for-outside-school-care-groups-dropped/news-story/20e5d242cf7bd2a57943154d225a634f" target="_blank">Bridget Carter, 'Merger plans for outside school care groups dropped' (The Australian, 27 September 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Middleton orders rehearing of Tabcorp/Tatts merger authorisation application</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:28:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Justice Middleton, President of the Australian Competition Tribunal, today ordered a rehearing of Tabcorp's application for authorisation on 24-25 October.</p>
    <p>Last week the full Federal Court sent the matter back to the Tribunal after upholding one of the ACCC's judicial review claims.</p>
    <p>Authorisation applications must be decided within six months (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca95AZI.html">or the Tribunal will be taken to have refused authorisation pursuant to s 95AZI</a>). As six month has passed since <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/documents/act2017/act-1-2017-form-s-170313.PDF" target="_blank">Tabcorp applied for authorisation</a> (on 13 March) there was doubt about whether the Tribunal still had jurisdiction to consider the matter. The Australian's Ben Butler reports that, although Justice Middleton considered the Tribunal did have that power, he nevertheless suggested Tabcorp make fresh application to avoid subsequent challenge. </p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/tabcorptatts-tieup-gets-inside-running-as-timetable-thrown-into-disarray/news-story/7ea60ea35ade6ed3dee3e19d0426b971" target="_blank">Ben Butler, 'Tabcorp-Tatts tie-up gets inside running as timetable thrown into disarray' (The Australian, 26 September 2017)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/tatts-set-to-scrap-megamerger-shareholder-vote-20170926-gyoxfr.html" target="_blank">Nick Toscano, 'Tatts set to scrap mega-merger shareholder vote' (SMH, 26 September 2017)</a>.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">my Tabcorp page for further details</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks fresh hearing in Tabcorp/Tatts merger</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:27:03 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p></a>The ACCC is seeking a fresh hearing for the Tabcorp/Tatts merger proposal. </p>
    <p>As a result of the judical review application, more than six months (the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca95AZI.html">maximum statutory limit</a> for authorisation applications) has passed since <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/documents/act2017/act-1-2017-form-s-170313.PDF" target="_blank">Tabcorp applied for authorisation</a> (on 13 March). This has raised the issue of whether or not the Tribunal still has jurisdiction to consider the matter. The ACCC has argued that because of this doubt a further application should be made to avoid any potential future dispute. </p>
    <p>See<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/markets/accc-seeks-new-hearing-on-tabcorptatts-merger/news-story/20a725ec4e189240a5e574dd35e61cf4" target="_blank"> Ben Butler, 'ACCC seeks new hearing on Tabcorp-Tatts merger' (The Australian, 26 September 2017)</a>. See also Bridget <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/dataroom/lawyers-sweat-on-gaming-merger-as-value-evaporates/news-story/d0fb01e38c03f03bc8a1e24e8b4acddb" target="_blank">Carter and Scott Murdoch, 'Lawyers sweat on gaming merger as value evaporates' (The Australian, 26 September 2017)</a>.</p>
    <p>The matter <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/current-matters/listings" target="_blank">was listed for a directions hearing</a> this morning.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">my Tabcorp page for further details</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC loses Australian Egg Corporation appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 20:28:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="mergers/2017tabcorp.html"></a>The Full Federal Court today unanimously dismissed the ACCC's appeal in its case against Australian Egg Corporation Ltd (AECL) and others. It had alleged AECL had attempted to induce egg producers to enter into a cartel arrangement to reduce the supply of eggs at an 'Egg Oversupply Crisis Meeting'.</p>
    <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has said that the outcome 'highlights the importance of the Federal Government's Competition Policy Reform Bill, which introduces a concerted practices prohibition ...'</p>
    <p>The ACCC has indicated it will 'carefully consider' the judgment.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/full-federal-court-dismisses-accc%E2%80%99s-appeal-in-australian-egg-corporation-case" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2017/2017fcafc0152" target="_blank">the judgment</a>. View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2017egg.html">my case page for further links and media as it emerges</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Grattan Institute event in Melbourne next week: Competition in the Australian economy: too little of a good thing</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 20:28:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Grattan Institute is holding a Policy Pitch event on 3 October, featuring <a href="experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Prof Caron Beaton-Wells</a> and <a href="experts/king-stephen.html">Dr Stephen King</a>, with Jim Minifie as moderator. The panel discussion will include consideration of the following questions:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>'How valid are concerns about competition and market power in Australia?</li>
      <li>Where is competition working less well than it could, and what are its limits as a policy tool? </li>
      <li>What else should policymakers do to ensure competition benefits the community?'</li>
    </ul>
    <p>The event will be held on 3 October at the State Library from 6-7:15pm; it is free to register.</p>
    <p><a href="https://grattan.edu.au/events/competition-in-the-australian-economy-too-little-of-a-good-thing-melbourne/" target="_blank">For details and to register visit the Grattan Institute event page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC moves offices in Melbourne</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 20:28:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="mergers/2017tabcorp.html"></a>The ACCC's Melbourne office has begun relocating from 360 Elizabeth Street to 2 Lonsdale St (level 17). There will be staff at both offices until 2pm on 6 October.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-melbourne-office-is-moving-to-lonsdale-street" target="_blank">'ACCC Melbourne office is moving to Lonsdale St' (ACCC Update, 22 September 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Schaper to stand down as small business commissioner next year</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2017 20:27:53 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="mergers/2017tabcorp.html"></a>Michael Schaper, the ACCC's Small Business Commissioner, will step down from the role in 2018 after nine years in the position. </p>
    <p>John Durie takes a look at quick look at the role: <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/michael-schaper-the-champion-of-small-business-to-step-down/news-story/7aca7a33d59717a11722b85fe86809b2" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Michael Schaper, the champion of small business, to step down' (The Australian, 23 September 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reasons for decision out in Tabcorp</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:19:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The reasons for judgment have been released in the Tabcorp/Tatts judicial review matter - sooner than expected.
<p>Of the ACCC's three grounds of judicial review only the first succeeded: the Court concluded the Tribunal erred in not considering detriments other than the detriment of substantially lessening competition.</p>
<p>For details of the grounds of appeal and the Court's finding see my blog: </p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/09/22/reasons-out-in-tabcorp/" target=_blank>Reasons out in Tabcorp</a> </li></ul>
<p>For the full reasons see <a href="https://jade.io/article/548528" target=_blank>ACCC v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 150 (Jade)</a> (or at <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2017/150.html" target=_blank>AustLII</a>)</p>
<p>For media see, for example <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-wont-be-rushed-on-tatts/news-story/2de974522ade270eaa2130edbe707b4c" target=_blank>Damon Kitney, 'ACCC "won't be rushed on Tatts"' (The Australian, 22 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/tabcorp-tatts-confident-of-merger-despite-dangers-of-longer-delay-20170921-gym6et.html" target=_blank>Nick Toscano, 'Tabcorp, Tatts confident of merger despite dangers of longer delay' (SMH, 22 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/gambling/tabcorp-tatts-deal-faces-further-delays-20170921-gylzhx" target=_blank>John Stenshold, 'Tabcorp Tatts deal faces further delays' (AFR, 21 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/tabcorp-and-tatts-hits-fresh-hurdle-as-doubts-loom-over-tribunals-jurisidiction/news-story/5f3140a43c7eba7355209bf6202ec8e3" target=_blank>John Durie, 'Tabcorp-Tatts tie-up hits fresh hurdle as doubts loom over tribunal’s jurisidiction' (The Australian, 22 September 2017)</a></p>
<p>See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">my Tatts/Tabcorp merger page.</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: Merit in studying implications of tech giants</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:18:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Sims: Merit in studying implications of tech giants]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judgment on Tabcorp merger</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:30:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Full Federal Court (comprising Justice Besanko, Justice Perram and Justice Robertson) handed down its judgment on the appeals by ACCC and Crownbet against the decision of the Australian Competition Tribunal in relation to the Tatts/Tabcorp merger authorisation. </p>
              <p>The appeal was successful and the Court has sent the matter back to the Australian Competition Tribunal for review. Reasons for judgment have been embargoed for the next five days. </p>
              <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/tabcorp-merger-with-tatts-sent-back-to-australian-competition-tribunal/news-story/7805d526fbdd5feb535aa356bfd4df96" target="_blank">Scott Murdoch, 'Tabcorp merger with Tatts sent back to Australian Competition Tribunal' (The Australian, 20 September 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/trading-day/business-markets-live/news-story/b6a7e0f0a50b4267d94b47b9ad6b1dc3?keyevent=2.22pm" target="_blank">Scott Murdoch, 'Tabcorp, Tatts merger hits hurdle' (The Australian, 20 September 2017)</a>. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/tabcorp-and-tatts-merger-derailed-in-federal-court-20170920-gyl2cd.html" target="_blank">also Nick Toscano, 'Tabcorp and Tatts merger derailed in Federal Court' (SMH, 20 September 2017)</a>.</p>
              <p>See further</p>
              <ul>
                <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">My Tatts/Tabcorp merger page</a> for background and links to the Tribunal decision.</li>
                <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/federal-court-ruling-on-tabcorptatts-tieup-looms/news-story/e22fb1b6535f856704fd836cef6c02e3" target="_blank">Ben Butler, 'Federal Court ruling on Tabcorp-Tatts tie-up looms' (The Australian, 19 September 2017)</a></li>
              </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC conducting local market screening re: BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths' retail service station sites</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:00:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has published a Local market screening letter inviting submissions from interested parties by 28 September 2017.</p>
		      <p>The ACCC <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/federal-court-ruling-on-tabcorptatts-tieup-looms/news-story/e22fb1b6535f856704fd836cef6c02e3" target="_blank"></a>issued a Statement of Issues outlining preliminary competition concerns on 10 August 2017. The proposed day for the announcement of the ACCC's findings is 26 October 2017.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200605/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC merger register</a>.</p>
		      <p>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/retail/bp-woolworths-fuel-deal-under-spotlight-20170919-gyk76d" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell, 'BP, Woolworths fuel deal under spotlight' (AFR, 19 September 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims's speech to National Press Club on energy affordability </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:47:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, address the <a href="https://www.npc.org.au/speakers/rod-sims/" target="_blank">National Press Club</a> at lunchtime today on the issue of gas and  electricity affordability.</p>
    <p>The speech is now available:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/keeping-the-lights-on-australia%E2%80%99s-energy-affordability-crisis" target="_blank">ACCC Media Release, 'Keeping the lights on: Australia’s energy affordability crisis' (20 September 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/shining-a-light-australia%E2%80%99s-gas-and-electricity-affordability-problem" target="_blank">Rod Sims, 'Keeping the lights on: Australia’s energy affordability crisis' (Speech to National Press Club, 20 September 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tabcorp listed for judgment in Federal Court today</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:19:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/court-calendar/daily-court-lists/vic" target="_blank">Federal Court Registry</a> lists the ACCC and Crownbet appeals against the decision of the Austrlaian Competiton Tribunal for judgment at 2:15pm today.</p>
    <p>The matter was heard by Justice Besanko, Justice Perram and Justice Robertson. </p>
    <p>See further</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">My Tatts/Tabcorp merger page</a> for background and links to the Tribunal decision.</li>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/federal-court-ruling-on-tabcorptatts-tieup-looms/news-story/e22fb1b6535f856704fd836cef6c02e3" target="_blank">Ben Butler, 'Federal Court ruling on Tabcorp-Tatts tie-up looms' (The Australian, 19 September 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims to address National Press Club on energy affordability today</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:29:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, will address the <a href="https://www.npc.org.au/speakers/rod-sims/" target="_blank">National Press Club</a> at lunchtime today. His topic: 'Shining a light: Australia's gas and electricity affordability problem'.</p>
    <p>For some media ahead of the speech, see:</p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/integrated-energy-retailers-get-shock-treatment-from-sims/news-story/044865f78afe443aba1b459a476585f4" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Integrated energy retailers get shock treatment from Sims' (The Australian, 20 September 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/sep/13/competition-regulator-agl-not-abusing-market-power-by-refusing-to-sell-liddell" target="_blank">Katharine Murphy, 'Rod Sims contradicts Coalition MPs' claims AGL is abusing market power (The Guardian, 13 September 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wants four pillars bank policy reviewed</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:07:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In a <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/221860/sub017-financial-system.pdf" target=_blank>submission</a> to the <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/financial-system#draft" target=_blank>Productivity Commission's Inquiry into the Australian Financial System</a>, the ACCC has suggested that the PC consider the impact of the four pillars policy on competition (para 3.2). The policy prevents mergers between the four major banks. The submission states, in part:
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<p>... the “four pillars” policy provides clarity and certainty that any mergers between the large banks would not be permitted. In that sense, the policy reflects a decision by the government to prevent further consolidation in an otherwise concentrated market rather than leaving this decision potentially with the Court, should a merger be challenged on competition grounds. </p>
<p>Conversely, it could be argued that the policy insulates the large banks from competition. Arguably the effect of the “four pillars” policy in addition to the implicit guarantee and prudential measures entrenches the large banks’ strong position in relevant markets and reinforces their “too big to fail” status. Whether this limits the ability of new entrants and smaller banks to constrain the large banks is a question we consider warrants further consideration. ...</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
<p>The ACCC indicates it has not formed a final view on the issue. Its submission sets out in more detail the divergent views about the policy. The submission also sets out a number of initiatives the ACCC considers may reduce barriers to competition in retail banking, including reducing restrictions on the use of the term 'bank'.</p>
<p>See further:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/financial-system#draft" target=_blank>Productivity Commission's Inquiry into the Australian Financial System</a> (including terms of reference and the 29 initial submissions to the Inquiry) 
<li><a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/221860/sub017-financial-system.pdf" target=_blank>ACCC submission to PC inquiry</a> (PDF) (also available from <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/consultations-submissions/accc-submissions#financial-services" target=_blank>ACCC submissions website</a>) 
<li>Media: <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/big-bank-mergers-accc-wants-four-pillars-policy-examined-20170919-gykg9m.html" target=_blank>Clancy Yeates, 'Big bank mergers: ACCC wants 'four pillars' policy examined' (SMH, 20 September 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/competition-probe-shakes-four-pillars-banking-policy/news-story/86105ff8490ee284930d7d9e1b83d940" target=_blank>Richard Gluyas, 'Competition probe shakes Four Pillars banking policy' (The Australian, 20 September 2017)</a> </li></ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Looks like October for the Harper Bill</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:06:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> (Harper Bill) was back on the Senate Red today, but further lengthy debate on <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5907%22">Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Broadcasting Reform) Bill 2017</a> (which eventually passed around 4:30pm) means the Senate is not likely to get to it today (<strong>update:</strong> it didn't make it ... October it is).</p>
    <p>The Senate does not sit again until mid-October.</p>
    <p>See, eg, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/parliamentary-delay-keeps-competition-reform-at-bay/news-story/bf6213e9086eda38aa3e0d726dd07048" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Parliamentary delay keeps competition reform at bay' (The Australian, 14 September 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: AGL's ownership of Liddell and Bayswater anticompetitive</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an interview with the Australian Financial Review, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, described AGL's ownership of the Liddell and Bayswater powerplants as anticompetitive. </p>
    <p>Sims points to the ACCC's opposition to AGL's deal to buy MacGen from the NSW government, which was<a href="mergers/2014agl.html"> approved by the Australian Competition Tribunal in 2014</a> after the ACCC refuse to grant informal clearance. Sims told the AFR that the ACCC thinks the merger 'is having an effect on increasing power prices right now'.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/energy/electricity/agl-energys-liddell-ownership-anticompetitive-sims-20170913-gygizj" target="_blank">Angela Macdonald-Smith, 'AGL Energy's Liddell ownership 'anti-competitive': Sims' (AFR, 13 September 2017)</a></p>
    <p>See also <a href="http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2017/09/14/accc-says-agl-behaviour--anti-competitive-.html" target="_blank">'ACCC sys AGL behaviour 'anti-competitive' (Sky News, 14 September 2017)</a> (includes video)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to investigate Google and Facebook</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:05:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
    <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/facebook-715811_640.jpg" alt="Image of facebook" width="250" height="137" class="alignleft"/>As part of a deal to get media laws through the Senate, Treasurer Scott Morrison has agreed to have the ACCC conduct an inquiry into Google and Facebook (and other internet giants). </p>
    <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/browser-773216_640.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="176" class="alignleft"/>This follows Senator Xenophon (whose vote was crucial to the Govt) expressing concerns that Google and Facebook were 'hoovering up' billions in advertising revenue.</p>
    <p>See,e g, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/media-reforms-set-to-pass-the-senate-clearing-the-way-for-major-mergers-and-acquisitions-20170913-gygx0v" target="_blank">Bevan Shield and Lucy Battersby, 'Media reforms to pass the Senate, clearing the way for major mergers and acquisitions' (SMH, 14 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/media-reforms-senate-inks-deal-on-critical-media-shakeup/news-story/cc911257a4767474e9ca51f6300feaae" target="_blank">Kylar Loussikian and Sharri Markson, 'Media Reforms: Senate Inks Deals on Critical Media Shake-Up' (Daily Telegraph, 14 September 2017)</a>,<a href="http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2017/09/14/media-reforms-expected-to-pass-senate.html" target="_blank"> AAP, 'Media reforms set to pass Senate' (SkyNews, 14 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/fifield-close-to-media-reform-breakthrough-with-crossbench/news-story/317d49351887b19840ed0bdd4e1b36c3" target="_blank">Darren Davidson, 'Fifield close to media reform breakthrough with crossbench' (The Australian, 11 September 2017)</a>. </p>
    <p>See also <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/am/media-laws-package-to-pass-after-xenophon-deal/8943814" target="_blank">Stephanie Dalzell, 'Media laws package to pass after Xenophon deal' (ABC Radio, AM with Sabra Lane, 14 September 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Bill listed again in today's Senate Red</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:39:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The <a href="legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> (Harper Bill) was listed in the Senate yesterday, but lengthy debate on the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fs1092%22" target="_blank">Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017</a> and <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5907%22">Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Broadcasting Reform) Bill 2017</a> prevented the Senate reaching the Harper Bill before adjourning.</p>
    <p>The Bill is back on the Red today. Broadcasting Reform bill still up first, but debate not expected to last long this morning. It's possible that may be followed by introduction of the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5869%22" target="_blank">Higher Education Support Legislation Amendment (A More Sustainable, Responsive  and Transparent Higher Education System) Bill 2017</a>. Then follows second reading debate on the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5851%22" target="_blank">Australian Border Force Amendment (Protected Information) Bill 2017</a> before the Harper Bill. If it doesn't make it today we'll have to wait until the next sitting in mid-October.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: Fuel price data can benefit motorists and retailers</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:39:12 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, has delivered a speech at the Asia Pacific Fuel Industry Forum, outlining how 'fuel price data from websites and apps empower price-sensitive customers'.</p>
    <p>The speech sets out the ACCC's role and activity in petrol, including quarterly reporting, market studies in regional markets, investigating of shopper dockets and merger review. Sims also discusses the ACCC's investigation into Informed Sources and the resulting undertaking that Informed Sources makes the same fuel price information it provides to subscribers available to consumers (which has happened since May 2016). Sims then goes on to discuss international evidence around the benefits of petrol price transparency and the recent increase in availability of price information to customers in Australia.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/fuel-price-data-can-benefit-motorists-and-retailers" title="ACCC Petrol MR" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/fuel-price-transparency-and-retail-industry-competition" title="Sims Petrol Speech" target="_blank">speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inquiry into Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017 now accepting submissions</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:02:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Senate yesterday referred the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a> to the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications" target="_blank">Environment and Communications Legislation Committee</a> for report by 16 October 2017. </p>
              <p>The Committee is now accepting submissions until 19 September 2017. </p>
              <p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2017meritsreview.html">my inquiry page for further details</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC launches first business to business unfair contracts term case</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:01:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has instituted proceedings against waste management company, JJ Richardss &amp; Sons Pty Ltd, alleging eight clauses in its standard form small business contract are void because they are 'unfair' under the Australian Consumer Law.		      See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-jj-richards-to-court-over-alleged-unfair-contract-terms" target="_blank">ACCC media release for details</a>. </p>
		      <p>The unfair terms law has applied to consumer transactions for a number of years, but only extended to small business contracts in November 2016. See also <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/unfair-terms-in-small-business-contracts" target="_blank">ACCC report discussing unfair terms in small business contracts</a>, published 10 November 2016.		      </p>
		      <p>See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/managing/game-changer-as-accc-launches-first-small-business-unfair-contracts-court-action-20170907-gycoac.html" target="_blank">Cara Waters, 'ACCC launches first small business unfair contracts court action' (SMH, 7 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-07/accc-takes-action-against-waste-contractor-jj-richards/8881560" target="_blank">Stephen  Letts, 'ACCC accuses JJ Richards over rubbish contracts with small businesses' (ABC, 7 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-sues-waste-firm-for-unfair-contracts/news-story/56449763882e5fe1e8d674f7e6a5a671" target="_blank">Michael Roddon, 'ACCC sues waste firm for unfair contracts' (The Australian, 8 September 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/test-case-for-new-small-business-contracts-law/news-story/9c76c6ee638f04403fdb1daa088e8092" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Test case for new small business contracts law' (The Austra]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate sends CCA (Abolition of Ltd Merits Review) Bill to Committee</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:39:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Selection of Bills Committee <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/externallink.png" alt="External link" /><a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/02%20Parliamentary%20Business/22%20Chamber%20Documents/Dynamic%20Red%20-%2045th%20Parliament/59%20-%207%20September%202017/SBC%20report%2010" target="_blank">reported (report 10 of 2017) </a> in the Senate today that it was unable to reach agreement about whether to refer the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a> to Committee. </p>
    <p>Senator Gallagher then moved that the bill be referred to the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications" target="_blank">Environment and Communications Legislation Committee</a> for report by 16 October 2017. The Senate divided. The motion to adopt the report was agreed to as amendmed by Senator Gallagher (Ayes 33, Noes 24).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate debate on competition reform bills </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:06:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Three competition bills were before the Senate yesterday.</p>
		      <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a>, while listed (after being introduced Tuesday afternoon), was not debated yesterday; it is scheduled for resumption of debate today.</p>
		      <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> was introduced and read for the first time. Second reading speeches commenced, with <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html#ruston" target="_blank">Senator Ruston's reading speech</a> incorporated in Hansard (in substantially the same form as the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html#second" target="_blank">Treasurer's second reading speech in the House</a> earlier this year). Debate was adjourned.</p>
		      <p>Finally, the <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/externallink.png" alt="External link" /><a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/TelcoBills2017" target="_blank">Legislation Committee's Report</a> on the <img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/externallink.png" alt="External link" /><a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5923" target="_blank">Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer) Bill 2017</a> was tabled by Senator Fawcett. Two related bills were considered as part of this inquiry. They relate to regulatory arrangements for the NBN and follow the <a href="https://www.communications.gov.au/departmental-news/independent-cost-benefit-analysis-nbn" target="_blank">Vertigan Panel report</a>. The Committee recommended some amendment to the related bill, but otherwise recommended passage of both bills.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition reform bills in the Senate</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:06:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Two competition reforms bills passed the House yesterday.</p>
		      <p>The first, the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a> is listed for second reading debate this morning.</p>
		      <p>The second, the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> - is simply noted on <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Dynamic_Red" target="_blank">today's order of business</a> as a bill for concurrence. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy) Bill passes House</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:05:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The main Harper Bill - the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review ) Bill 2017</a> - passed the House late this afternoon<a href="http://www.commbarmatters.com.au/2017/09/05/uncooperative-federalism-and-the-abolition-of-limited-merits-review/" target="_blank"></a>.</p>
		      <p>The bill contains many of the changes to the law proposed by the Harper panel, including changes relating to cartels, price signally and concerted practices, third line forcing, resale price maintenance, authorisations, notifications and class exemptions, among other things. It also proposes to increase penalties for secondary boycott conduct (to align with the existing penalties for other Part IV breaches), a move strongly opposed by the Labor party (Labor has indicated it supports the remaining amendments).</p>
		      <p>The introduction of the effects test for misuse of market power was passed into law late last month via separate legislation (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Act 2017 (Act 87 of 2017)</a>), but the key provisions won't come into operation unless and until the main Harper Bill is passed.</p>
		      <p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html" title="Link to Harper Bill Page" target="_blank">my bill page</a> for further details and links to second reading speeches etc.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Merits Review) Bill passes House</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:04:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a> passed the House this morning.</p>
		      <p>The EM explains that the Bill is designed to 'prevent the Australian Competition Tribunal ... from reviewing certain decisions made under the national energy laws and to ensure that decisions made by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) under those laws are not subject to merits review by any other State or Territory body'.</p>
		      <p>For some commentary on the bill and its implications see, eg, <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columnists/scrapping-the-limited-merits-review-will-cost-consumers-long-term-20170629-gx0yi3" target="_blank">Brendan Lyon, 'Scrapping the 'Limited Merits Review' will cost consumers long term' (AFR, 29 June 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.commbarmatters.com.au/2017/09/05/uncooperative-federalism-and-the-abolition-of-limited-merits-review/" target="_blank">Matthew Peckham, 'Uncooperative federalism and the abolition of limited merits review' (CommBar Matters Blog, The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debate on AER limited merits review bill has resumed</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:41:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Debate on <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a> resumed in the House late this afternoon.</p>
    <p>The EM explains that the Bill is designed to 'prevent the Australian Competition Tribunal ... from reviewing certain decisions made under the national energy laws and to ensure that decisions made by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) under those laws are not subject to merits review by any other State or Territory body'.</p>
    <p>In a <a href="http://www.joshfrydenberg.com.au/guest/mediaReleasesDetails.aspx?id=404" target="_blank">press release accompanying the introduction of the Act</a> last month, Josh Frydenberg MP claimed the bill will 'remove the ability of regulated energy network companies to game the system at the expense of consumers'</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Labor supports all but one change in the Harper Bill; it will oppose proposed changes to secondary boycott penalties</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Sep 2017 12:41:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Debate is <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/About_the_House_News/This_week_in_the_House" target="_blank">set to resume in the House</a> on the Harper Bill (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017</a>) tomorrow. </p>
    <p>In a <a href="http://www.andrewleigh.com/competition_policy_review_bill_media_release" target="_blank">joint  media release issued today</a>, Brendan O'Connor MP (Shadow Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations) and Andrew Leigh MP (Shadow Assistant Treasurer) have announced that Labor supports 13 of the 14 schedules contained in the Bill, labeling them 'largely uncontroversial'. </p>
    <p>However, Labor will oppose the proposed increase in maximum penalties for breaches of secondary boycott provisions form $750,000 to $10m, designed to bring them into line with the penalties available for other competition law contraventions. Labor argues that international law permits 'sympathy strikes' and higher penalties would for secondary boycotts would 'move Australia even further away from international best practice'. Labor will, therefore, move amendments to remove Schedule 6 (dealing with secondary boycotts) form the Bill.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Parliament resumes and competition bills set to be debated</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Sep 2017 11:40:33 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Debate is <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/About_the_House_News/This_week_in_the_House" target="_blank">set to resume in the House</a> on two competition bills this week. </p>
    <p>The first, the Competition and Consumer Amendment (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017meritsreview-aer.html">Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a>), is due to be debated this afternoon. </p>
    <p>The second and more significant is the Harper Bill (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017</a>), scheduled to be debated in the House tomorrow.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In brief: Katherine Kemp explains Australia's New Misuse of Market Power Law</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:59:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/kemp-katharine.html">Dr Katherine Kemp</a> has issued a brief guide on Australia's new misuse of market power law. The law received Royal Assent last week but the provisions will not commence until after the passage of <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017</a>.</p>
    <p>Kemp usefully outlines key changes, myths about the amendment and weaknesses in the new law.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://clmr.unsw.edu.au/australia-misuse-of-market-power-law#" target="_blank">Australia’s New Misuse of Market Power Law: In Brief (UNSW, CLMR, 31 August 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Excessive payment surcharge ban now in force</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:59:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>All businesses are now banned from charging excessive surcharges for using certain types of EFTPOS/credit carts to make payments.</p>
    <p>Although the ban has been in place for large businesses since September last year, it now applies to all businesses based in Australia or which use an Australian bank.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/excessive-payment-surcharge-ban" title="Surcharge media release" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/ban-on-excessive-payment-surcharging" target="_blank">ACCC online guide</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Updated compilation of Competition and Consumer Act 2010</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:58:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Compilation No 108 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 was published on the Federal Register of Legislation today.</p>
              <p>This compilation is dated 23 August 2017 and replaces compilation 107 dated 23 February 2017.</p>
              <p>View <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00274" target="_blank">current compilation of CCA at Federal Register of Legislation</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC report shows petrol retail margins remain high despite price drop for June quarter</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:57:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC's most recent report on the petrol industry for the June quarter 2007 shows that average petrol prices in the five largest cities dropped by almost 4c per litre, but gross retail margins remain high and are the highest (on an annual average basis) than at any time since the ACCC began monitoring in 2002. </p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/petrol-prices-at-lowest-level-since-2002-but-margins-high" title="Petrol media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/quarterly-reports-on-the-australian-petroleum-industry/quarterly-report-on-the-australian-petroleum-market-june-quarter-2017" title="eRx register" target="_blank">report for June quarter</a>. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/quarterly-reports-on-the-australian-petroleum-industry" target="_blank">all quarterly reports on Australian petroleum industry</a>. See also, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/petrol-costs-down-but-prices-still-too-high-says-accc/news-story/eedebc04eafe35f67ca98382679fc951" target="_blank">Matt Chambers, 'Petrol costs down but prices still too high, says ACCC' (The Australian, 1 September 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises eRx Script Exchange to continue revenue sharing agreement</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:57:31 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to authorise eRx Script Exchange Pty Ltd to 'continue to give effect to an interoperability arrangement that involves some revenue sharing with IP MDS Pty Ltd until 30 June 2020.' </p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-re-authorises-erx-script-exchange-to-continue-revenue-sharing-arrangement" title="eRx MR" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>
             ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC won't oppose Tronox's proposed acquisition of Cristal's titanium dioxide business</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:57:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Tronox's proposed acquisition of Cristal's titanium dioxide business, finding that 'a combined Tronox-Cristal is likely to continue to face competition from imported titanium dioxide pigments'. </p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-tronoxs-proposed-acquisition-of-cristals-titanium-dioxide-business" title="Tronox media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>
              <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1203480/fromItemId/751046" title="Tronox MR" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise Woolworths' discount programs with participating BP sites</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:55:52 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
              <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/fuel-1596622_640.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="166" class="alignleft"/>The ACCC has issued a draft decision proposing conditional authorisation for an alliance between BP and Woolworths which 'would allow participating BP service stations to accept Woolworths shopper dockets and participate in the Woolworths Rewards loyalty program, if BP is successful in acquiring Woolworths’ service stations.'</p>
              <p>Authorisation will be conditional on parties not offering fuel discounts from shopper dockets in excess of 4 cents per litre.</p>
              <p>The ACCC is conducting a separate merger review of BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths' service stations.</p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-roll-out-of-woolworths-discount-programs-to-participating-bp-sites" title="BP Media R" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202159/fromItemId/278039" title="BP authorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. See also <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200605/fromItemId/750991" title="BP merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a> (a statement of issues was published by the ACCC on 10 August)</p>
              <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-green-lights-use-of-woolworths-shopper-docket-fuel-discounts-at-bp-service-stations/news-story/c7b9563c523f9dc7e18cc53e467809a6" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'ACCC green lights use of Woolworths shopper docket fuel discounts at BP service stations' (The Australian, 29 August 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-nod-for-woolworths-shopper-docket-roll-out-to-bp-appears-to-benefit-coles/news-story/ce4f4b3d254911a594fea4d28868e4e0" target="_blank"> John Durie, 'Woolies' BP tick from ACCC boosts Coles' (The Australian, 29 August 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power receives Royal Assent</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:55:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[              <p>The misuse of market power bill received Royal Assent last week and is now in force as the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Act 2017 (Act 87 of 2017)</a>.</p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017G00923" target="_blank">Commonwealth of Australia Gazette C2017G00923 (28 August 2017)</a>.</p>
              <p>Commencement of the new provisions is, however, contingent on the passage of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims' address to CEDA WA</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:11:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has spoken at the CEDA WA conference today, outlining the role of the ACCC in a changing economy. The speech covers (among other things):</p>
    <ul>
      <li>the ACCC's inquiry into the financial sector</li>
      <li>the approach to broadband advertising</li>
      <li>the banking inquiry</li>
      <li>the ACCC's separate inquiries into gas and electricity (including the east coast energy affordability crisis)</li>
      <li>the ACCC's approach to cartel behaviour</li>
    </ul>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/competition-regulators-economy-wide-focus" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>
    <p><a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/chairmans-address-to-ceda-wa" target="_blank">View speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC gives green light to Gordon and Murdoch bid for Ten</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:11:45 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed bid for the Ten Network by Birketu Pty Ltd (owned by Bruce Gordon) and Illyria Nominees Television Pty Ltd (owned by Lachlan Murdoch). The deal still requires passage of new media ownership laws in order to proceed.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-birketu-and-illyrias-proposed-acquisition-of-ten" title="TenNetwork Media" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1203377/fromItemId/751046" title="TenNetwork MR" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-24/ten-takeover-by-murdoch-gordon-gets-accc-green-light/8837964?pfmredir=sm" target="_blank">Michael Janda and David Chau, 'Ten takeover by Lachlan Murdoch and Bruce Gordon gets ACCC green light' (ABC News, 24 August 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/lachlan-murdoch-bruce-gordon-get-accc-green-light-to-buy-ten-20170823-gy2w8q.html" target="_blank">Lucy Battersby, 'Lachlan Murdoch, Bruce Gordon get ACCC green light to buy Ten' (SMH, 24 August 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/media/accc-clears-potential-bid-for-ten-network-by-lachlan-murdoch-bruce-gordon/news-story/a2ed0e8d4c657f5e00351360e1e16d3c" target="_blank">AAP, 'ACCC clears potential bid for Ten Network by Lachlan Murdoch, Bruce Gordon' (news.com.au, 24 August 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues SOI on proposed acquisition of OfficeMax</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:11:31 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a Statement of Issues in relation to Platinum Equity's proposed acquisition of OfficeMax Australia. It has indicated its 'primary concern is that the loss of competition between Staples and OfficeMax could result in higher prices and lower levels of service'. Interested parties have until 7 September to make submissions; a final decision is expected on 16 November 2017.</p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-platinum-equitys-proposed-acquisition-of-officemax" title="Officemax MR" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1201892/fromItemId/750991" title="OfficeMax Merger Register" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlueScope admits it is being investigated for potential cartel conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:11:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>BlueScope has admitted it is being investigated for potential cartel conduct involving imported steel. </p>
    <p>The <a href="https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/bluescope-corporate-umbraco-media/media/2260/fy2017-investor-presentation-final.pdf" target="_blank">FY2017 Financial Results Presentation</a> by Paul O'Malley (CEO) and Charlie Elias (CFO) yesterday revealed (page 13) stating that over the last financial year the ACCC has been 'investigating potential cartel conduct by BlueScope relating to the supply of steel products in Australia, that
      involved a small number of BlueScope employees in the period from late 2013 to mid 2014.' The presentation states that the ACCC's investigation is ongoing and that BlueScope 'has co-operated, and continues to co-operate, with the ACCC's investigation'.</p>
    <p>See </p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/omalleys-magnificent-reign-cartel-capers-mar-the-end-of-omalleys-magnificent-reign/news-story/3099deba4be84162c4b4d6c43b1d93a6?login=1" target="_blank">John  Durie, 'Cartel capers mar end of Paul O'Malley's BlueScope reign' (The Australian, 22 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/business/manufacturing/bluescopes-paul-omalley-steps-down-mark-vassella-to-be-ceo-20170818-gxzmud" target="_blank">Simon Evans, 'BlueScope's Paul O'Malley steps down, Mark Vassella to be CEO' (AFR, 21 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/4867760/bluescope-investigated-over-possible-price-fixing/" target="_blank">Glen Humphries, 'BlueScope investigated over possible price-fixing' (Illawarra Mercury, 21 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-21/bluescope-doubles-profit-but-warns-of-rising-energy-costs/8827752" target="_blank">Nick McLaren, 'BlueScope doubles profit but warns of rising energy costs, cartel investigation' (ABC News, 21 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com.au/bluescope-steel-shares-are-getting-smoked-2017-8" target="_blank">Sam Jacobs, 'BlueScope is being investigated, its CEO has resigned and shares are down 20%' (Business Insider Australia, 21 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/bluescope-appoints-new-ceo-as-paul-omalley-retires/news-story/0f755bf534cad130ec2d5e1d12307077" target="_blank">John Durie and Matt Chambers, 'BlueScope shares dive more than 20pc as Paul O'Malley retires' (The Australian, 21 August 2017)</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Concerted Practices and Algorithmic Collusion</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:10:33 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A copy of the presentation by Rob Nicholls and Brent Fisse, delivered by Brent Fisse at this year's Competition and Consumer Law Workshop, is now available online:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p><a href="https://www.brentfisse.com/images/Nicholls_Fisse_Concerted_Practices_and_Algorithmic_Coordination.pdf" target="_blank">'Concerted Practices and Algorithmic Coordination: Does the Proposed CP Prohibition Compute?' (Presentation at LCA Competition and Consumer Law Workshop, Melbourne, 5 August 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Advance copy of 'Regulating Supermarkets: The Competition for Space' now available</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:12:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/forthcoming-issue" target="_blank">University of New South Wales Law Journal</a> has released an advance copy of an article by Christopher Arup, Caron Beaton-Wells and Jo Paul-Taylor entitled '<a href="http://unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/403_advanceaccess_07.pdf" target="_blank">Regulating Supermarkets: The Competition for Space</a>'. The focus is planning restrictions and begins:</p>
      <blockquote>
        <p>'... The purpose of this article is to evaluate the case for a proposed competition
          policy law reform. If implemented, the reform would roll back land-use planning
          regulation, so that supermarket businesses have greater freedom to regulate
          privately where and with what format they site their stores. ...'</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court hands down Port of Newcastle decision</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:11:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Full Federal Court today unanimously dismissed Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd's application for judicial review of an access decision made by the Australian Competition Tribunal in June 2016. The Tribunal (in <em><a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2016/2016acompt0006" target="_blank">Application by Glencore Coal Pty Ltd </a></em><a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2016/2016acompt0006">[2016] ACompT 6</a> and <em><a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2016/2016acompt0007" target="_blank">Application by Glencore Coal Pty Ltd </a></em><a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2016/2016acompt0007">[2016] ACompT 7</a>) had set aside a decision of the Minister not to declare a service under <a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca44H.html">s 44H</a> and had declared the service pursuant to <a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca44K.html">s 44K</a>.</p>
    <p>Plenty of media coverage. See, eg: </p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/federal-court-rules-on-newcastle-port-charge-regulation/news-story/6820b1b99a7744294e6ab5938ee65e26" target="_blank">Andrew White, 'Federal Court rules on Newcastle port charge regulation' (The Australian, 16 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.theherald.com.au/story/4859403/pricing-blow-for-port-of-newcastle/" target="_blank">Joanne McCarthy, 'Hunter mining interests have had a big win against the Port of Newcastle over future pricing' (Newcastle Herald, 16 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.theherald.com.au/story/4859740/ugly-hit-that-came-back-to-bite-port/" target="_blank">Joanne McCarthy, 'The Port of Newcastle introduced savage price hikes that led to Federal Court action' (Hewcastle Herald, 17 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/court-ruling-on-newcastle-port-sounds-alarm-for-monopolies/news-story/2e0498ffa88a2c9b46d9942321808213" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Court ruling on Newcastle port sounds alarm for monopolies' (The Australian, 17 August 2017)</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.afr.com/business/accc-glencore-win-port-of-newcastle-battle-20170816-gxx5cc" target="_blank">Jenny Wiggins, 'ACCC, Glencore win Port of Newcastle battle' (AFR, 16 August 2017)</a>.    </li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposed to approve collective bargaining between Licensed Post Offices and Australia Post</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:11:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a '<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D17+113682.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1203316&amp;trimFileName=D17+113682.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation to Licensed Post Office Group Ltd (LPO Group) and its current and future licensed post office members to collectively negotiate with Australia Post.' </p>
    <p>The ACCC indicated it did not consider 'that the proposed conduct is likely to result in significant public detriment given that competition between licensed post offices is limited, negotiations are entirely voluntary in nature, and authorisation does not extend to any collective boycott of products or services supplied by LPOs'</p>
    <p>Submissions on the draft determination may be made until 6 September; a final decision is expected by November 2017</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-approve-collective-bargaining-between-licensed-post-offices-and-australia-post" title="Post Media Release" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202204/fromItemId/278039" title="Post authorisation register" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power bill amendment agreed to by House</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:10:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2017</a> returned to the House today after the Senate yesterday voted to pass the bill with amendment. The House agreed to the amended bill just after 7pm this evening.</p>
    <p>The Treasurer was quick to issue a press release celebrating the bill's passage: <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/077-2017/" target="_blank">Treasurer: Strengthened competition law to benefit Aussie small businesses and consumers (15 August 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Weighty week' for competition law: Durie</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:10:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie's column today hightlights the various developments in competition law taking place this week; among them parliamentary debate on the Harper amendments.</p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/a-weighty-week-for-competition-law/news-story/8c6af82100b1fe01917cf16c1f8278be" target="_blank">John Durie, 'A weighty week for competition law' (The Australian, 15 August 2017).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects test passes Senate with amendment</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:41:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Debate resumed in the senate on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2017</a>, including consideration of two amendments - one from the Greens and one from the Nick Xenophon team. </p>
              <p>The Xenophon amendment (which included substantial changes to the proposed law, including introduction of divestiture powers for breaches of s 46) did not succeed. The Greens' amendment, which related to the telecommunications industry provisions in Schedule 2, was supported.</p>
              <p>The bill then passed comfortably (22 vote majority) despite opposition from the Labor Senators.</p>
              <p>See eg, <a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/08/14/competition-laws-clear-senate" target="_blank">AAP, 'Competition laws clear the Senate: New laws designed to protect small businesses from big competitors like Coles and Woolworths have cleared the Senate' (SBS, 14 August 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Greens warn Labor on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2017 09:41:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Despite the Greens supporting passage of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017mmp-access.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment (Small Business Access to Justice) Bill 2017</a> (now befor ethe House), they have warned Labor not to use this as an excuse to oppose the <em><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2017</a></em> due to be debated next week. </p>
              <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/greens-warn-labor-over-competition-law/news-story/c5f73c60f8e6461fc40cfd63b618f800" target="_blank">Belinda Merhab, 'Greens warn Labor over competition law' (The Weekend Australian, 10 August 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small Business Access to Justice Bill passes Senate</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:40:47 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Debate resumed in the Senate today on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017mmp-access.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment (Small Business Access to Justice) Bill 2017</a> - a private members' bill introduced by Senator Katy Gallagher in February. <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/summary/summary.w3p;query=BillId_Phrase%3A%22s1058%22%20Dataset%3Ahansardr,hansards%20Title%3A%22second%20reading%22;rec=0" target="_blank">Several speeches were made</a> in relation to the Bill and the bill passed by 36-22.</p>
              <p>The Bill was then introduced and read a first time in the House. If passed by the House the Bill will amend the Competition and Consumer Act to allow judges to waive liability for adverse costs to small bsuiness litigants in misuse of market power cases.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Delia Rickard reappointed to ACCC</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:40:20 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Government has reappointed Delia Rickard as Deputy Chair of the ACCC for five years. ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, said of the re-appintment:</p>
              <blockquote>
                <p>'Delia has made an outstanding contribution to the work of the ACCC over the past five years, particularly in relation to consumer protection ... Delia is a tireless advocate for consumer rights and leads the Commission’s product safety and scam disruption work. ... Delia’s reappointment reaffirms the Government’s commitment to consumer protection and welfare amongst its broader market performance-enhancing initiatives across the economy. We look forward to Delia’s continued leadership in these important areas at the ACCC ...'</p>
              </blockquote>
              <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-welcomes-reappointment-of-deputy-chair-delia-rickard" title="Media Richard" target="_blank">media release</a>.              </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises airline alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:32:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has today 'granted authorisation to coordinate airline services for five years to Virgin Australia Airlines, the HNA Aviation Group, Hong Kong Airlines and Hong Kong Express Airways.' The ACCC believes the alliance 'will likely realise significant public benefits, primarily through supporting the introduction of new services between Australia and mainland China and Hong Kong including by Virgin'. Interim authorisation has been in place since March.</p>
      <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-virgin-australias-mainland-china-and-hong-kong-airline-alliance" title="Media airline alliance" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1201183/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Statement of Issues on BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths' petrol sites</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:31:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/fuel-1596622_640.jpg" alt="Image of petrol pumps
" width="250" height="166" class="alignleft"/>The ACCC has released a Statement of Issues on BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths' petrol sites, identifying some preliminary concerns that the proposed acquisition 'may substantially lessen competition for the retail supply of fuel across metropolitan areas.'</p>
    <p>Submissions on the SOI are due by 7 September. A final decision is expected by 26 October 2017.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-bps-proposed-acquisition-of-woolworths-petrol-sites" title="Media BP" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200605/fromItemId/750991" title="MR for BP acquisition Woolworths" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC raises concerns with Camp Australia Junior Adventures proposed merger</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:31:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 
has issued a Statement of Issues raising preliminary concerns about the proposed merger between Camp Australia and Junior Adventures. The primary concern is that: </p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>... the loss of competition between Camp Australia and JAG for the supply of before and after school care could result in higher prices for parents and lower quality care for students in some states ...</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>The ACCC has invited further submissions which are due by 25 August; a final decision is expected by 26 October 2017.</p>
    <p>View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-has-concerns-about-camp-australia-and-junior-adventures-merger" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202418/fromItemId/750991" title="MR for Camp Australia" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power not debated but small business bill now being debated</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:30:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <em><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2017</a></em> was listed on the Senate's Order of Business yesterday, but time defeated resumption of second reading debate. This morning debate on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017mmp-access.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment (Small Business Access to Justice) Bill 2017</a> resumed; the MMP bill is not currently listed for debate.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New competition bill introduced</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:29:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pexels/electrcity-twilight-power-lines-evening-evening-sun-46169.jpeg" alt="Image of electricity wires" width="250" height="154" class="alignleft"/>Josh Frydenberg MP (Minister for the Environment and Energy) introduced a new bill - the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5929%22" target="_blank">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017</a> into the House today.</p>
    <p>The Explanatory Memorandum states that the Bill amends the CCA to </p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>'prevent the Australian Competition Tribunal ... from reviewing certain decisions made under the national
        energy laws and to ensure that decisions made by the Australian Energy
        Regulator (AER) under those laws are not subject to merits review by any
        other State or Territory body'</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treasury releases Exposure Draft Regulations</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:29:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In a sign that the Government has not forgotten about competition policy reform, Treasury today released <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2017/Consequential-amendments-to-Competition-and-Consumer-Regulations" target="_blank">Exposure Draft amendments to the Competition and Consumer Regulations</a> which will follow from proposed amendments to the Act in the <em><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2017</a></em> and the <em><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017</a></em>, both currently before Parliament.</p>
    <p>Submissions may be made until 22 August.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beaton-Wells: Cartel case shows not all corporate misbehaviour goes unpunished</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:27:05 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/law-1063249_640.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="187" class="alignleft"/>Professor Caron Beaton-Wells has penned an opinion piece for <em>The Conversation </em>on last week's criminal conviction of NYK for cartel conduct. </p>
    <p>See <a href="https://theconversation.com/cartel-case-shows-not-all-corporate-misbehaviour-goes-unpunished-82149?utm_source=facebook&amp;utm_medium=facebookbutton" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells, 'Cartel case shows not all corporate misbehaviour goes unpunished' (The Conversation, 7 August 2017)</a>. </p>
    <p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2017nyk.html" title="Link to NYK case page">also NYK case page for further details</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims' speech to LCA: expect more 155 notices for complex merger reviews</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:18:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/08/05/sims-lca/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims has spoken at the Law Council of Australia's Business Law Section Competition and Consumer Committee Workshop, discussing the ACCC's compliance and enforcement mix, investment in the ACCC's criminal cartel unit and mergers. <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/law-council-of-australia" target="_blank">View speech</a>.</p>
              <p>Importantly, Sims announced that the ACCC would be taking a more documentary-heavy approach to evidence gathering in <strong>contentious merger cases</strong>, including more s 155 notices which would push out timelines in those cases. </p>
              <p>On a separate matter, Sims announced that the ACCC would be reviewing its cartel immunity and cooperation policy again in light of recent experiences with criminal cartel investigations.</p>
              <p>See further my blog  on this: <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/08/05/sims-lca/" target="_blank">'ACCC to increase focus on evidence-gathering in merger cases' (Australian Competition Law Blog, 5 August 2017)</a>.</p>
              <p>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/accc-says-mergers-to-take-longer-under-documentheavy-approach-20170804-gxpj2r" target="_blank">Michael Smith, 'ACCC says mergers to take longer under document-heavy approach' (AFR, 5 August 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-gets-more-demanding-in-merger-crackdown/news-story/10d1fe8ec91a5129feb5e009ce7a42a8" target="_blank">Sarah-Jane Tasker, 'ACCC gets more demanding in merger crackdown' (The Australian, 5 August 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Initial thoughts on the criminal cartel fine</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:17:52 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/08/04/first-criminal-cartel-conviction-some-initial-thoughts/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>I've posted a blog with some initial thoughts on the cartel fine handed down yesterday against NYK: see <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/08/04/first-criminal-cartel-conviction-some-initial-thoughts/" target="_blank">NYK blog</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First criminal cartel conviction</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Aug 2017 20:28:44 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The Federal Court today convicted Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK) of criminal cartel conduct and ordered it to pay a fine of $25m. This was the first successful prosecution under Australia's criminal cartel provisions which have been in place since 2009. The fine includes a significant discount (50%) for an early guilty plea, cooperation and contrition)</p>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/nyk-convicted-of-criminal-cartel-conduct-and-fined-25-million" title="Link to ACCC media release in NYK" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2017/2017fca0876" title="Link to NYK judgment" target="_blank">judgment</a>. See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2017nyk.html">my case page for further details</a>.</p>
      <p>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/transport/accc-secures-second-biggest-fine-ever-against-shipping-cartel-20170803-gxoujv?&amp;utm_source=social&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=nc&amp;eid=socialn:twi-14omn0055-optim-nnn:nonpaid-27/06/2014-social_traffic-all-organicpost-nnn-afr-o&amp;campaign_code=nocode&amp;promote_channel=social_twitter" target="_blank">James Thomson, 'ACCC secures second biggest fine ever against shipping cartel' (AFR, 3 August 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/shipping-giant-convicted-fined-25m-for-running-australian-car-imports-cartel-20170803-gxortv.html" target="_blank">Nick Toscano, 'Shipping giant convicted, fined $25m, for running Australian car imports cartel' (SMH, 3 August 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/japanese-shipping-firm-fined-25m-in-first-successful-criminal-cartel-prosecution/news-story/29cdf9601e8b049fafba38de8eaa325e" target="_blank">Christian Edwards, 'Japanese shipping firm fined $25m in first successful criminal cartel prosecution' (The Australian, 3 August 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel penalty of $3.5m imposed against Prysmian</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:31:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Federal Court has ordered that Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL pay a pecuniary penalty of $3.5 m for cartel conduct in relation to the supply of high voltage land cables. This follows the Court's finding of contravention in July last year. </p>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/prysmian-to-pay-penalty-of-35m-for-engaging-in-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. </p>
      <p>See penalty decision: <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2017/851.html" title="Link to Prysmian at AustLII" target="_blank">ACCC v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L. (No 13) [2017] FCA 851 (28 July 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers Weekly: report predicts ACCC will 'up the ante' against cartels</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:31:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers weekly has an item discussing Allen &amp; Overy's Global Cartel Enforcement report which predicts the ACCC will be more active in cartel enforcement in the second half of 2017. See <a href="https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/biglaw/21573-accc-to-up-the-ante-against-cartels-report" target="_blank">Tom Lodewyke, 'ACCC to ‘up the ante’ against cartels: report' (Lawyers Weekly, 27 July 2017)</a>. </p>
    <p>See also <a href="http://www.allenovery.com/publications/en-gb/globalcartelenforcement/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank">Allen &amp; Overy Global Cartel Enforcement 2017 Mid-Year report</a>. The report notes that in the past six months the ACCC has issued only one cartel fine, but that increased activity is expected in the second half of 2017 as the ACCC awaits judgments and penalty outcomes in a number of proceedings (including the <a href="cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre case</a>).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on electricity affordability</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:30:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, delivered the welcome address at the ACCC &amp; AER Regulatory conference, focusing on electricity affordability. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/welcome-address-accc-aer-regulatory-conference" target="_blank">speech</a>. See also opinion piece in the Courier Mail: <a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/opinion-its-time-to-get-real-on-electricity-prices/news-story/fa0a092d3f71fcca82fbcbeeedbf2749" target="_blank">Rod Sims, 'Opinion: It's time to get real on electricity prices' (The Courier-Mail, 27 July 2017)</a>. </p>
    <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/rod-sims-and-accc-takes-on-power-affordability/news-story/88162c0c518e19da7fbc603c1fdb7dcd" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Rod Sims and ACCC takes on power affordability' (The Australian, 27 July 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/acccs-rod-sims-wants-cheaper-energy-more-competition-20170726-gxj2n3" target="_blank">Ben Potter, 'ACCC's Rod Sims wants cheaper energy, more competition' (AFR, 26 July 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to hold first public hearing into power prices</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 20:29:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC will hold its first public hearing into power prices in <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/legal-economic/electricity-supply-and-prices-inquiry-public-forum/supporting_documents/Brisbane%20forum%20agenda%20%2025%20July%202017.pdf" target="_blank">Brisbane</a> today as part of its <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/inquiry-into-retail-electricity-prices-and-supply/" target="_blank">inquiry into national electricity prices</a>, <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/inquiry-into-retail-electricity-prices-and-supply/supporting_documents/Retail%20Electricity%20Inquiry%20%20Terms%20of%20reference.pdf" target="_blank">ordered by the Treasurer</a> in March. Several other forums are <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/legal-economic/electricity-supply-and-prices-inquiry-public-forum/" target="_blank">scheduled over the coming months</a>. The ACCC has also released an <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/legal-economic/electricity-supply-and-prices-inquiry-public-forum/supporting_documents/Summary%20of%20submissions%20to%20issues%20paper%20%2024%20July%202017.pdf" target="_blank">overview of the submissions made in response to the issues paper</a>.</p>
    <p>See, eg,<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/accc-to-hold-first-public-hearing-into-power-prices-in-brisbane-on-tuesday-20170723-gxgztb.html" target="_blank"> Cameron Atfield, 'ACCC to hold first public hearing into power prices in Brisbane on Tuesday' (SMH, 23 July 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC withdraws injunction application in Tabcorp/Tatts case</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 20:29:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has withdrawn its application for an injunction to prevent the Tabcorp/Tatts deal proceeding while its application for judicial review is considered. The injunction application was due to be considered by the Federal Court next Thursday. </p>
    <p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-withdraws-injunction-to-stop-tabcorp-completing-tatts-takeover/news-story/4db2cab7a86cbab84d0d099b8a1633d4" target="_blank"> Sarah-Jane Tasker, 'ACCC withdraws injunction to stop Tabcorp completing Tatts takeover' (The Australian, 21 July 2017)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: Open markets must benefit consumers or distrust will grow</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:08:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the <a href="http://ace2017.org.au/" target="_blank">2017 Australian Conference of Economists</a> in Sydney today. In his speech he referenced increasing public disillusionment with the market economy and disappointment that the economics profession had not 'been more influential in public policy debates in recent time'. He observed that economists 'who ground their contributions in the facts of everyday life and relax the often abstract assumptions of theory will find an audience more willing to listen'.</p>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/open-markets-must-benefit-consumers-or-distrust-will-grow" title="Economics media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/ceteris-paribus-competition-is-king" target="_blank">speech ('Ceteris Paribus, Competition is King' (2017 Annual Conference of Economists, 21 July 2017))</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on telco competition</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:08:34 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the Communications Day Unwired Revolution Conference in Sydney today. He claimed there were 'encouraging signs that competition in the sector was healthy' and welcomed the entrance of new participants. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-on-changing-telecommunications-market-dynamic" title="Telco media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/communications-at-the-turning-point" title="Telco speech" target="_blank">speech</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases findings of beer tap investigation</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:57:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its findings into an investigation of the contracts of CUB and Lion, following allegations from some craft brewers that they were being locked out of beer taps in certain venues as a result of exclusivity provisions and volume requirements.</p>
              <p>The ACCC concluded that the contracts were unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the markets investigated. However, it notes that it will continue to monitor developments in the market.</p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-findings-of-beer-taps-investigation" title="ACCC media beer" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CrownBet applies for Judicial Review of Tabcorp Ruling</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:56:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>CrownBet, one of the interveners Tabcorp's application for merger authorisation, has filed for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision. This follow's the ACCC's application for judicial review on Monday. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/crownbet-joins-battle-against-tabcorptatts-merger/news-story/95b90f43171b1b2ea850fa5d5e4b1cc7?login=1" target="_blank">Sarah-Jane Tasker, 'CrownBet joins battle against Tabcorp-Tatts merger' (The Australian, 13 July 2017)</a></p>
              <p>The Federal Court has scheduled a case management hearing for both applications for 9:30am Friday.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC appeals Tribunal's Tabcorp ruling</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:30:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[      <p>The ACCC has applied to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/">Australian Competition Tribunal&rsquo;s</a> recent <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">Tabcorp/Tatts merger authorisation decision</a>. An appeal on the merits is not available for Tribunal merger authorisation decisions, but the ACCC is seeking judicial review, alleging three reviewable errors, including that the Tribunal erred in its reasoning that 'it could only conclude that the proposed acquisition was likely to result in a detriment if the Tribunal concluded that there would be a substantial lessening of competition&rsquo;.   </p>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-tribunal-decision-in-tabcorp-tatts-merger">ACCC Media Release, 10 July 2017</a>. See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/07/10/accc-appeals-tabcorp/" target="_blank">my blog piece</a> for further details and links to news and commentary.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC/Canadian CB staff exchange</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Jul 2017 14:29:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The ACCC has announced that Ms Jeanne Pratt of the <a href="http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/home" target="_blank">Canadian Competition Bureau</a> will be 'acting Executive General Manager of its Merger and Authorisation Review Branch as part of a 12-month interchange' with Mr Rami Greiss taking up the position of Senior Deputy Commissioner, Cartels and Deceptive Marketing Practices Branch at the Canadian Competition Bureau. </p>
    <p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pexels/pexels-photo-maple-leaf-edit.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="155" class="alignleft"/>The ACCC press release notes that this exchange will 'provide ACCC staff the opportunity to expand their knowledge of international competition regimes and best practices, share their experiences of the Australian regime and for both countries to continue to build their expertise in various areas of competition.' </p>
    <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/canadian-connection-builds-on-international-experience" title="ACCC-Canada" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/competition-bureau/news/2017/06/international_interchangebringschangestoseniormanagement.html" target="_blank">Canadian Competition Bureau News Release</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to examine Murdoch and Gordon's proposed acquisition of Ten</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:32:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC will examine the proposed acquisition of Ten Network by Lachlan Murdoch and Bruce Gordon, which will be contingent on changes to media ownership law. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202693/fromItemId/750991" title="Merger register 10" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>
              <p> See, eg, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/media-and-marketing/tv/accc-to-look-at-lachlan-murdoch-and-bruce-gordons-ten-bid-20170704-gx490d" target="_blank">Max Mason, 'ACCC to look at Lachlan Murdoch and Bruce Gordon's Ten bid' (AFR, 4 July 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/accc-reviewed-proposed-joint-bid-for-ten-network/news-story/2948251dcbd64ec9031b0961797adce0" target="_blank">Andrew White and John Durie, 'ACCC reviews proposed joint bid for Ten Network' (The Australian, 4 July 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/outflanked-murdoch-and-gordon-face-a-race-for-control-of-ten-analyst-says-20170705-gx5a7b.html" target="_blank">Christian Edwards, ''Outflanked': 'Outflanked': Murdoch and Gordon face a race for control of Ten, analyst says' (SMH, 5 July 2017)</a>, and <a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/media/accc-confirms-takeover-bid-for-network-ten-by-lachlan-murdoch-and-bruce-gordon/news-story/4cc049a4892122947a4c7846677aa3cb" target="_blank">AAP, 'ACCC confirms takeover bid for Network Ten by Lachlan Murdoch and Bruce Gordon' (news.com.au, 5 July 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC urges small business to review payment surcharges</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:31:45 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has urged small business owners to prepare for the ban on excessive payment surcharges that will come into operation on 1 September 2017. The law limiting the amount business can charge for the use of certain payment methods (eg, EFTPOS, Visa) came into operation for large businesses last year, but will apply to all business from 1 September 2017. Under the new laws business can only pass on the cost of processing payments (anything exceeding this is considered 'excessive'). </p>
              <p>The new laws were introduced through the <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016A00009" target="_blank">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Payment Surcharges) Act 2016</a>, which inserted a new Part IVC of the CCA, including s55B which provides that a 'corporation must not, in trade or commerce, charge a payment surcharge that is excessive'.</p>
              <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/small-business-urged-to-review-their-payment-surcharges" target="_blank">ACCC media release 'Small business urged to review their payment surcharges' (3 July 2017)</a> and <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/business/pricing-surcharging/payment-surcharges" target="_blank">ACCC payment surcharges page</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation fo collective bargaining with Australia Post</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:31:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D17+89077.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1202674&amp;trimFileName=D17+89077.pdf" target="_blank">granted interim authorisation</a> for the LPO Group 'and its current and future licensed post office members to  collectively negotiate, enter into and give effect to agreements with Australia Post.' The authorisation is limited to 'licensee payments and commissions as part of the annual payment review, as well as remuneration for any new services introduced by Australia Post'. The ACCC does not consider that the granting of interim authorisation will harm the competitive process or interested parties while full consideration of the application continues. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/interim-authorisation-granted-for-collective-bargaining-between-licensed-post-offices-and-australia-post" title="AusPost media" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202204/fromItemId/278039" title="Interim Auth AP" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal publishes judgment in Tabcorp</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:29:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian Competition Tribunal has published its reasons for decision in the Tabcorp merger authorisation (<a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2017/2017acompt0001" target="_blank">Application by Tabcorp Holdings Limited [2017] ACompT 1</a>).  The reasons run to 255 pages. The <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australian-competition-tribunal-decision-on-tabcorp-tatts-merger" target="_blank">ACCC has also provided an initial response</a> indicating that it 'will now consider the reasons for decision published by the Tribunal.' See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">my case page for further details links to commentary</a>.</p>
             ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Cabcharge's proposed acquisition of Yellow Cabs in Queensland</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:58:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#cabchargeaccc</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Cabcharge of Yellow Cabs (Qld), concluding that the acquisition was unlikely to 'result in Cabcharge foreclosing competition from alternative non-cash payment system providers, as there are a number of alternative systems available and it is drivers who choose which system to use' and that the taxi business is also being 'constrained by the popularity of ridesharing services such as Uber'. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-cabcharge-buying-yellow-cabs-in-queensland" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202587/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baxt Lecture on Designing Cartel Sanctions</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:57:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#baxt8</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ginsburg-Douglas.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.htmlimages/publicdomain/Ginsburg-Douglas-PublicDomain.jpg" alt="Judge Ginsburg 2005" width="150" height="214" class="alignleft" title="Judge Ginsburg 2005"/></a>Judge Douglas Ginsburg (Federal US judge on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and <a href="https://www.law.gmu.edu/faculty/directory/fulltime/ginsburg_douglas" target="_blank">Professor of law, George Mason University</a>) delivered the <a href="http://law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/clen/engagement/annual-baxt-lecture" target="_blank">8th Annual Baxt Lecture</a> at the Melbourne Law School this evening, speaking on 'Designing Cartel Sanctions: A Continuing Debate'. </p>
    <p>Judge Ginsburg's address focussed on the importance of directing sanctions to the individuals involved in the contraventions, rather than continuing to increase corporate sanctions; the latter, it was argued, both fails to increase deterrence and imposes penalties on shareholders who were not involved in the misconduct and cannot be deterred. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal authorises Tabcorp's proposed acquisition of Tatts Group Ltd</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:55:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#tabcorpapproved</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Australian Competition Tribunal Tribunal has authorised the proposed acquisition of Tatts Group ltd by Tabcorp; reasons for this decision are expected to be published on Thursday. <a href="https://www.tabcorp.com.au/news-media/media-releases/tabcorp-provides-updates-on-tabcorp-tatts-transact" target="_blank">Tabcorp has issues a press release</a> welcoming the decision. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/tabcorps-highrisk-strategy-pays-off-as-tribunal-approves-tatts-merger/news-story/64af868344d235153e6a56283e762bc8" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Tabcorp’s high-risk strategy pays off as tribunal approves Tatts merger' (The Australian, 20 June 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/gambling/tabcorp-tatts-11bn-merger-gets-green-light-from-competition-tribunal-20170619-gwu4ol" target="_blank">John Stensholt, 'Tabcorp-Tatts $11b merger gets green light from Competition Tribunal' (AFR, 20 June 2017)</a>. See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html">my case page</a> for further details an links.  </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court unanimously dismisses air cargo appeals</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:40:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#cargo</category>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The High Court today unanimously dismissed the appeals from Air New Zealand and PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd. The appeals focus on the meaning of a market 'in Australia'. The <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2017/hca-21-2017-06-14.pdf" target="_blank">High Court's judgment summary</a> states that: </p>
      <blockquote>
        <p>'The plurality held that a market, within the
          meaning of the TPA, was a notional facility which accommodated rivalrous behaviour involving sellers and buyers,
          and that it was the substitutability of services as the driver of the rivalry between competitors to which s 4E looked
          to identify a market, rather than the circumstances of the act of substitution or the &quot;switching decision&quot; itself. In
          this case, the primary judge's findings established that Australia was not merely the &quot;end of the line&quot; for the air
          cargo services but was also a vital source of demand for those services from customers, namely, large shippers who
          were regarded as important to the profitability of the airlines' businesses. As a practical matter of business, the
          airlines' rivalrous pursuit of Australian customers, in the course of which the matching of supply with demand
          occurred, was in a market which included Australia; that was so even if the market might also have been said to
          include Singapore, Hong Kong or Indonesia' </p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>See <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_s245-2016" target="_blank">High Court case page</a>. See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2014airnz.html">my case page</a> for links to ealier judgments and commentary. Details to follow.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed merger of Dow and DuPont</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:59:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#dupont</category>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed merger of The Dow Chemical Company and EI Du Pont de Nemours and Company in Australia. </p>
      <p>The merger was previously cleared by other agencies; in the EU approval was subject to divestiture of certain assets. The ACCC considers that their earlier competition concerns regarding the merger will be addressed by those global divestments. </p>
      <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-wont-oppose-proposed-merger-of-dow-and-dupont-in-australia" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202487/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>McCowan: 'A Trust-Busting wind is blowing'</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:58:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#mccowan</category>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p><a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theodore_Roosevelt_in_1918.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/special/roosevelt-teddy-1918.jpg" alt="Teddy Roosevelt 1918.  Public domain image: source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theodore_Roosevelt_in_1918.jpg" width="164" height="200" class="alignleft" title="Teddy Roosevelt 1918"/></a>Mark McCowan, Parnter at Corrs Chambers Westgarth, has published an opinion piece entitled 'A Trust-Busting Wind is Blowing', warning against populist reforms to Australian competition laws. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Andrew Leigh MP's on competition: A Few Big Firms</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:28:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#stephan</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/copyright.html#politicians"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/politicians/leigh-andrew-45th.jpg" alt="Image sourced from http://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Members/Members_Photos (CC BY-SA 3.0)" width="150" height="200" class="alignleft" title="Andrew Leigh"/></a>Shadow Assistant Treasurer, Andrew Leigh MP, will call for more to be done about Australia's 'growing competition problem' in a seminar to be delivered at Murdoch University today. Amongst other things, he will argue something needs to be done about the increasing use of non-compete clauses which, he will argue, 'make it harder for employees to switch to a better job and stifle start-ups'. See <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jun/07/labor-flags-plan-to-crack-down-on-non-compete-clauses-for-employees" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'Labor flags plan to crack down on non-compete clauses for employees' (The Guardian, 7 June 2017)</a>. See also, <a href="http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/06/07/00/02/industry-concentration-worsening-labor" target="_blank">AAP, 'Industry concentration worsening: Labor' (7 June 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shadow Assistant Treasurer wants crack down on non-compete clauses</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:46:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/copyright.html#politicians"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/politicians/leigh-andrew-45th.jpg" alt="Image sourced from http://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Members/Members_Photos (CC BY-SA 3.0)" width="150" height="200" class="alignleft" title="Andrew Leigh"/></a>Shadow Assistant Treasurer, Andrew Leigh MP, will call for more to be done about Australia's 'growing competition problem' in a seminar to be delivered at Murdoch University today. Amongst other things, he will argue something needs to be done about the increasing use of non-compete clauses which, he will argue, 'make it harder for employees to switch to a better job and stifle start-ups'. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Andreas Stephan on the normative justifications for cartel criminalisation</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:31:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/pixabay/handcuffs-2102488_640.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="119"/>Although not Australian specific, UK Prof (and frequent visitor to Aus) Andreas Stephan's new paper examining the normative justifications for cartel criminalisation is nevetheless highly relevant to Australian competition law enforcement. Australia has criminalised cartels since 2009 but has yet to charge any individuals for cartel conduct. </p>
    <p>The paper (<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lest.12165/full" target="_blank">Andreas Stephan, 'An empirical evaluation of the normative justifications for cartel criminalisation' (2017) <em>Legal Studies</em></a>) also references an Australian empirical study on cartel criminal sanctions conducted by the University of Melbourne and published in 2013 (<a href="http://antitrust.oxfordjournals.org/content/1/1/198.full" target="_blank">Beaton-Wells and Parker &lsquo;Justifying criminal sanctions for cartel conduct: a hard case&rsquo; (2013) 1(1) <em>J Antitrust Enforcement </em>198</a>)</p>
    <p><a href="https://twitter.com/cartelsman/status/871998982372950016" target="_blank"><img src="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/images/socialmedia/2017-stephan-cartel.jpg" width="560" height="70" alt="Link to original Tweet"/></a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beaton-Wells: Bigger fines needed for cartel conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:36:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Professor Caron Beaton-Wells has an item in today's <em>The Conversation</em> calling for bigger penalties for companies found to have engaged in cartel conduct that causes harm to Australian consumers. Current fines are described as 'woefully below international benchmarks'. The <a href="cases/2015yazaki.html">ACCC's appeal</a> against the Court's decision to fine Yazaki only A$9.5 million for cartel conduct is discussed. See <a href="https://theconversation.com/cartels-caught-ripping-off-australian-consumers-should-be-hit-with-bigger-fines-78750?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=twitterbutton" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells, 'Cartels caught ripping off Australian consumers should be hit with bigger fines' (The Conversation, 2 June 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC on the Tabcorp authorisation application</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:36:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There's plenty of media about the Tabcorp merger authorisation application currently before the Tribunal. The ACCC made submissions to the Tribunal today arguing that the proposed merger would not reap the public benefits claimed. A decision is expected from the Tribunal (comprising Justice Middleton, Grant Latta and Darryn Abraham) later this month. See, eg, <a href="http://at.theaustralian.com.au/link/84f1ea85bdbcca5e41c9239e4f7a9b57" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC off leash over Tabcorp-Tatts' (The Australian, 1 June 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/gambling/accc-not-satisfied-tabcorp-tatts-merger-in-public-interest-20170601-gwirex" target="_blank">John Stensholt, 'ACCC &quot;not satisfied&quot; Tabcorp Tatts merger in public interest' (AFR, 2 June 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-leaves-11bn-tabcorptatts-merger-hopes-in-tatters/news-story/38f2d7450c33ee08e03c1e4522eb5a19" target="_blank">Richard Gluyas, 'ACCC leaves $11bn Tabcorp-Tatts merger hopes in tatters' (The Australian, 2 June 2017)</a>. See further John Durie, 'Tabcorp's bet could sour' (The Australian, 2 June 2017, p 38).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poddar on ACCC's oOh!media opposition</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 16:35:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Following release of a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202240/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">statement of issues by the ACCC on 4 May</a>, the proposed merger between APN Outdoor Group Ltd and oOh!media was terminated. Clifford Chance's Dave Poddar has published a client briefing on the proposed merger, noting the importance of 'market definition and dynamics in media mergers'. See <a href="https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/cliffordchance/briefings/2017/05/the_accc_says_oohnototheoohmediaap.html" target="_blank">Dave Poddar, 'The ACCC says Ooh No! to the oOh!media - APN Outdoor merger' (Clifford Chance Client Briefing, 30 May 2017)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/oohmedia-and-apn-drop-16-billion-merger-after-competition-concerns-20170519-gw8gyw.html" target="_blank">Patrick Hatch, 'oOh!Media and APN drop $1.6 billion merger after competition concerns' (SMY, 19 May 2017)</a>,  <a href="https://mumbrella.com.au/accc-boss-hits-ooh-media-warns-outdoor-merger-failure-offers-lessons-media-consolidation-445967" target="_blank">Simon Canning, 'ACCC boss hits out at Ooh Media and warns outdoor merger failure offers lessons for media consolidation' (Mumbrella, 22 May 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/dataroom/future-foggy-as-apn-outdoor-oohmedia-deal-fails/news-story/164bda62b81ad63fdb582fe6720054d2" target="_blank">Bridget Carter &amp; Scott Murdoch, 'Future foggy as APN Outdoor, oOh!media deal fails' (The Australian, 22 May 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC appeals Yazaki Corporation penalty decision</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 14:49:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has appealed the decision of the Federal Court to impose a penalty of $9.5 million against Yazaki Corporation for collusion; the ACCC had sought a penalty between $42-$55 million. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-yazaki-corporation-penalty-decision" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2015yazaki.html">case page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Competition: 'A Tale of Two Authorisations'</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 14:48:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>James Gould has a post in King&amp;Wood Mallesons' 'In Competition' blog discussing two recent South Australian authorisation decisions. See <a href="http://incompetition.com.au/2017/05/south-australia-a-tale-of-two-authorisations/" target="_blank">James Gould, 'South Australia: A Tale of Two Authorisations' (In Competition, 23 May 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fly-in fly-out airline alliance authorised</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 14:48:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has authorised a Charter Alliance Agreement between Virgin and Alliance Aviation Services, pursuant to which the Virgin Australia Regional Airlines and Alliance Aviation Services will 'jointly bid for and contract with corporate charter customers in relation to the provision of fly-in fly-out (FIFO) services.' This follows the ACCC's initial proposal to deny authorisation in December 2016; subsequent market inquiries led the ACCC to conclude there were a 'number of factors that mitigate the risk to competition' so that likely public benefits will outweigh likely detriments.. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-fly-in-fly-out-airline-alliance" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198359/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tabcorp merger hearings begin in the Tribunal</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 14:48:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian Competition Tribunal commenced its hearing of <a href="mergers/2017tabcorp.html">Tabcorp's merger authorisation application</a> today. The matter is listed in the Victorian Fedearl Court Registry from 16 May - 2 June 2017 before Justice Middleton (President), Mr Grant Latta AM (Member) and Dr Darryn Abraham (Member). See, eg, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/gambling/accc-hits-out-at-tabcorp-as-merger-hearings-begin-20170516-gw5sci" target="_blank">John Stensholt, 'ACCC hits out at Tabcorp as merger hearings begin' (AFR, 16 May 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/tatts-tabcorp-merger-will-produce-a-behemoth-says-accc/news-story/3a4ddc249d5694228e77f3990c25dd56" target="_blank">Ben Butler and Sarah-Jane Tasker, 'Tatts, Tabcorp merger will produce a behemoth, says ACCC' (The Australian, 17 May 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Private members' bill debated </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 14:47:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017mmp-access.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment (Small Business Access to Justice) Bill 2017</a>, introduced by on 16 February by Senator Gallagher, was debated in the Senate on 11 May 2017. Several speeches were made by ALP and LP Senators and by Senator Xenophon, who noted during the course of his speech that he and his colleagues support, 'with some amendments' the 'effects test' contained in the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a>. In this respect, Senator Xenophon indicated he would move 'a whole range of amendments based on this bill to the government's effects test bill, because we think that is the right thing to do in order to make that piece of legislation work much more effectively'. All speeches can be viewed on the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/en/Parliamentary%20Business/Bills%20Legislation/Bills%20Search%20Results/Result/Second%20Reading%20Speeches?BillId=s1058" target="_blank">Second Reading speeches page for the bill</a>.              </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yazaki ordered to pay $9.5m in penalties for collusion</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 May 2017 13:22:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Federal Court today imposed penalties against Yazaki for 'engaging in collusive conduct with a competitor when supplying wire harnesses to Toyota Motor Corporation (Toyota) in Australia.' The ACCC sought significantly higher penalties (between $42-$55m) and is carefully considering the judgment. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/penalties-ordered-against-yazaki-for-collusive-conduct" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2015yazaki.html">case page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kemp on Misuse of Market Power</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 May 2017 13:22:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Katharine's Kemp's new article on misuse of market power is now available as an advance copy from the UNSW Law Journal. <a href="http://unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/04-kemp-advance-access-final.pdf" target="_blank">See Katharine Kemp, ‘“The Big Chill”? A Comparative Analysis of Effects-Based Tests for
                Misuse of Market Power’ (2017) 40(2) <em>University of New South Wales Law Journal</em>.</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: Restoring Faith in Free Markets</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 May 2017 13:22:20 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Chairman's speech at today's Competition Law Conference addressed the role of the ACCC in 'restoring faith in free markets'. <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/the-role-of-the-accc-in-restoring-faith-in-free-markets" target="_blank">View speech</a>. This followed a keynote address by former Chief Justice of the High Court, The Hon Robert French AC, who discussed the 'Role of the Regulator as Competition Advocate'.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes not to declare wholesale domestic mobile</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 May 2017 13:22:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has released its draft decision 'proposing to not declare a wholesale domestic mobile roaming service', observing that theres is 'insufficient evidence that declaration will improve the current state of competition.' See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-not-declare-wholesale-domestic-mobile-roaming" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/mobile-services/domestic-mobile-roaming-declaration-inquiry-2016" target="_blank">See draft decision on Domestic Mobile Roaming Declaration Inquiry 2016 page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SOI in relation to proposed APN Outdoor Group Ltd and oOh!media Ltd merger</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 13:21:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The ACCC has released a Statement of Issues 'expressing preliminary concerns about the proposed merger between APN Outdoor Group Limited ... and oOh!media Limited'. The concerns arise from the fact that the merger will 'combine the two largest providers of out-of-home advertising in Australia, creating a market leader with over 50 per cent of all out-of-home advertising, and an even higher share in some segments ...' See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-merger-between-apn-outdoor-group-limited-and-oohmedia-limited" title="Media OoH">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200187/fromItemId/750991" title="OOH Merger Register">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Caltex's proposed acquisition of Milemaker </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 13:18:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today announced that it has decided not to oppose the proposed acquisition by Caltex of a 'chain of Victorian service stations from Milemaker Petroleum'. This decision followed a Statement of Issues released in March and was described by the ACCC Chairman as a 'difficult decision' because 'competition will be reduced'; the ACCC concluded, however, that that reduction would not be substantial. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-caltexs-proposed-acquisition-of-milemaker" title="Media Caltex">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1202063/fromItemId/751046" title="Caltex Merger Register">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC alleges Ramsay Health Care engaged in anti-competitive conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 May 2017 15:56:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has 'instituted proceedings in the Federal Court against Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Limited (Ramsay) for alleged anti-competitive conduct involving misuse of market power and exclusive dealing in the Coffs Harbour region<em>.</em>' See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-ramsay-health-care-for-alleged-anti-competitive-conduct" title="Ramsay" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. The matter is listed for its first case management hearing on 13 June.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims claims misuse of market power laws 'almost unusable'</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 May 2017 15:56:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has described the current misuse of market power laws as 'almost unusable' according to SMH. The SMH article also notes that in order to pass the proposed changes to the MMP law the Government will need the support of at least one crossbencher. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs/misuse-of-market-power-laws-almost-unusable-accc-chairman-rod-sims-says-20170427-gvucjh.html" target="_blank">Madeleine Heffernan, 'Misuse of market power laws &quot;almost unusable', ACCC chairman Rod Sims says' (SMH, 30 April 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Former ACCC Chairman claims nothing to fear from Amazon</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:55:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, has dismissed claims that Amazon's entry into the Australian market would result in higher prices for Australian consumers, noting the entry of major international competitors into other markets in Australia has not driven out local competition. See <a href="http://thenewdaily.com.au/money/your-budget/2017/04/26/amazon-competition/" target="_blank">Jackson Stiles, 'Nothing to fear from Amazon: former ACCC boss' (The New Daily, 26 April 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues draft decision on Hunter Valley rail network access undertaking</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:55:12 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has 'issued a draft decision not to accept the proposed Hunter Valley rail network access undertaking lodged by the Australian Rail Track Corporation'. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-draft-decision-on-hunter-valley-rail-network-access-undertaking" title="Rail access" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/rail/hunter-valley-access-undertaking-2017" title="Electricity authorisation" target="_blank">Hunter Valley ccess undertaking 2017 page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise joint purchase of electricity</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:54:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has 'issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200538/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to allow the South Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy, along with 24 other South Australian businesses, to establish a joint electricity purchasing group.' See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-sa-businesses-for-the-joint-purchase-of-electricity" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200538/fromItemId/278039" title="Electricity authorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cane growers collective bargaining approved</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:54:34 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'authorised members of the Canegrowers Organisation to collectively bargain cane supply and related contracts with mill owners and sugar marketers for ten years.' See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-approves-cane-growers-collective-bargaining" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198882/fromItemId/278039" title="Cane authorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.  </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update on CCA Amendment Bill</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:54:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Gilbert + Tobin's Elizabeth Avery has published her 'Insights' on the <a href="legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017</a>, noting the changes from the exposure draft legislation. See <a href="https://www.gtlaw.com.au/insights/competition-and-consumer-act-amendment-bills-introduced-parliament-further-changes" target="_blank">'Competition and Consumer Act Amendment Bills introduced into Parliament, but with further changes' (G+T, Insights, 12 April 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie warns of reputation risk to ACCC</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:53:56 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In his column today, John Durie's warns that the ACCC's new 'dual rol'e as a 'point person' for the Government on 'key market issues' poses a risk to its reputation. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/acccs-new-dual-role-could-pose-a-risk-to-its-reputation/news-story/cdeec78dc524d1c99cfbada813a617a1" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC's new dual role could pose a risk to its reputation' (The Australian, 3 April 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mergers 2016</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Apr 2017 15:53:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Richard L'Estrange at King&amp;Wood Mallesons has published a blog piece reviewing '2016: The Year in Mergers' - it includes some commentary on the 33 public ACCC merger reviews as well as a tabular summary of their outcomes. See <a href="http://incompetition.com.au/2017/03/2016-the-year-in-mergers/" target="_blank">Richard L'Estrange, '2016: The Year in Mergers' (In Competition,King & Wood Mallesons, 28 March 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC denies authorisation for banks to collectively bargain with and boycott Apple Pay</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:45:38 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued its <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D17+40724.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1201670&amp;trimFileName=D17+40724.pdf" target=_blank>final determination </a>denying authorisation to the CBA, Westpac, NAB and Bendigo and Adelaide Bank to collectively bargain with and boycott Apple Pay. Chairman Rod Sims indicated that the ACCC was 'not satisfied, on balance, that the likely benefits from the proposed conduct outweigh the likely detriments. We are concerned that the proposed conduct is likely to reduce or distort competition in a number of markets'. 
<p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-denies-authorisation-for-banks-to-collectively-bargain-with-apple-and-boycott-apple-pay" target=_blank>ACCC media release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/401858" target=_blank>authorisation register</a>. See also my earlier blogs on the authorisation application (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2016/08/10/apple-versus-the-banks/" target=_blank>'Apple versus the banks' (20 August 2016)</a>; <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2016/08/19/banks-denied/" target=_blank>'Banks Denied Interim Authorisation for Cartel Conduct' (19 August 2016)</a>; <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/02/08/apple-goes-on-the-attack/" target=_blank>'Apple goes on the attack' (8 Feb 2017)</a>). </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Reforms: State of Play</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:25:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/03/30/harper-reforms-state-of-play/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Harper recommendations for reform to Australia’s competition laws are being introduced in two stages, with the misuse of market power reforms being debated separately from the remaining reforms.<p>
<p>See blog piece for further details</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Reforms before the House</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:26:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2017harper.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017</a> has been introduced into the House. Second reading debate has been ajourned until the next sitting of Parliament.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MMP bill read in the Senate; adjourned until next sitting</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:26:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> was read for a first time in the Senate and second reading speeches commenced but were then adjourned until the first day of the next sitting period.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MMP bill passes the House</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:33:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> passed the House of Representatives today, incorporating the Government's amendments (changing the commencement date and removing mandatory factors for court to consider). </p>
              <p>The Bill is listed for debate in the Senate tomorrow.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MMP debate resumed; further Harper bill 'imminent'</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:21:53 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Debate on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> resumed in the House of Representatives yesterday with a further 13 second reading speeches before it was agreed that the bill be read a second time. </p>
              <p>Treasurer Scott Morrison's amendment (changing the commencement date and removing mandatory factors for Court to consider) also passed before an adjournment. A brief <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A&quot;legislation/ems/r5788_ems_3b8ba987-5955-4a26-a77c-31d6a8244237&quot;" target="_blank">supplementary explanatory memo</a> was also tabled in relation to the amendment. It explains the change to the mandatory factors follows the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmpbill.html">Senate Economics Legislation Committee</a> recommendation and was designed to reduce complexity and uncertainty and 'reduce the risk that &quot;substantially lessening competition&quot; would unintentionally take on a different meaning in the context of section 46 compared to other provision ...'. It is not intended to 'change the objective of the new section 46'.</p>
              <p>The supplementary EM also indicates that the introduction of the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017 is 'imminent' and that the proposed change in commencement date is designed to ensure that the new MMP provision will not be introduced unless and until authorisation is made available (in the new bill) for section 46 conduct.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper reforms on their way</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:21:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian's John Durie reports today that the next suite of Harper Reforms are expected to be tabled in Parliament next week: <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/cba-within-the-law-but-community-expects-more/news-story/69c716754ee598a2bf29fe3f142afc1c" target="_blank">John Durie, 'CBA within the law but community expects more' (The Australian, 24 March 2017) (scroll down to 'Playing both sides')</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debate on MMP bill adjourned</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:20:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Debate on the <a href="legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> resumed in the House of Representatives yesterday, with Andrew Leigh MP (ALP), Ted O'Brien (LNP) and Tim Watts MP (ALP) all delivering speeches. Debate was adjourned in the late afternoon; the House next sits on Monday 27 March.</p>
              <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/bcas-grant-king-effects-test-will-lead-to-lawsuits/news-story/8e1de453f3ab8773e52cb5573b81dbfd" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'BCA's Grant King: effects test will lead to lawsuits' (The Australian, 24 March 2017)</a>; <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/bca-unleashes-on-malcolm-turnbulls-supposed-freemarket-government-20170323-gv4ol5" target="_blank">Jacob Greber, 'BCA unleashes on Malcolm Turnbull's 'supposed free-market government (AFR, 23 March 2017)</a>; <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columnists/chanticleer/bcas-king-talks-tough-as-government-relations-sour-20170323-gv4w94" target="_blank">Michael Smith, 'BCA's King talks tough as government relations sour' (AFR, 23 March 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/cba-within-the-law-but-community-expects-more/news-story/69c716754ee598a2bf29fe3f142afc1c" target="_blank">John Durie, 'CBA within the law but community expects more' (The Australian, 24 March 2017) (scroll down to 'Playing both sides')</a>.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debate to resume on Misuse of Market Power Bill</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:53:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Debate on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> is set to resume in the House of Representatives today, with Treasurer Scott Morrison set to move the amendment to the bill proposed by the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmpbill.html">Senate Economics Committee</a>. This amendment can be found on the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5788%22" target="_blank">Bill's homepage</a> and removes the mandatory factors originally provided for in s 46(2).</p>
 <p>The proposed amendment also changes the commencement date of the bill from the date of Royal Assent to the date that Schedule 1 to the <em>Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Act 2017 </em>commences. That bill has not yet been introduced, but presumably contains the other reforms outlined in the Exposure Draft Legislation released late last year. This change would delay the commencement of the MMP changes but would also overcome the problem associated with the authorisation provisions for misuse of market power not being included in the separate MMP Bill.</p>
 <p>See further <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/business-advice/competition/scott-morrison-amend-effects-test-legislation-remove-hurdles-proving-misuse-market-power/" target="_blank">Emma Koehn, 'Scott Morrison to amend effects test legislation to remove hurdles for proving misuse of market power' (Smart Company, 23 March 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/morrison-to-kill-off-lawyers-picnic-in-competition-effects-test-20170322-gv4033" target="_blank">Jacob Greber, 'Morrison to kill off 'lawyer's picnic' in competition effects test' (Australian Financial Review, 22 March 2017)</a>.</p>
  </div>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wins competition advocacy award</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:53:03 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC received an award by the World Bank and International Competition Network 'for its advocacy work in promoting pro-competition measures when governments are privatising public assets'. The award fell under the category 'Levelling the playing field through competitive neutrality or by elevating competition policy to the economic policy agenda'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-awarded-international-prize-for-competition-advocacy" title="Advocacy award" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://www.worldbank.org/en/events/2016/10/24/the-2016---2017-competition-advocacy-contest#4" target="_blank">ICN-WBC Winners page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Healthe Care's proposed acquisition of Pulse Health</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:52:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Pulse Health by Healthe Care (both private hospital operators). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-won%E2%80%99t-oppose-healthe-care%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-pulse-health" title="Healthe Care" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1201547/fromItemId/751046" title="Health Care PR" target="_blank">public register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation for airline Alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:52:19 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to Virgin Australia, HNA Group, Hong Kong Airlines, HK Express and their subsidiaries in relation to a proposed Alliance for the coordination of international passenger tarnsport between Australia and China. See<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1201183/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank"> authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases statement of issues on Caltex's proposed acquisition of Milemaker</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:51:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC this morning released a Statement of Issues in relation to the proposed acquisition by Caltex of a chain of Victorian service stations from Milemaker Petroleum: 'The ACCC's preliminary view is that the acquisition may substantially lessen competition for the retail supply of petrol in Melbourne'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-caltexs-proposed-acquisition-of-milemaker" title="Caltex media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199642/fromItemId/750991" title="Caltex merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tabcorp heads to Tribunal for ruling on merger deal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:09:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2017tabcorp.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the ACCC's release of a statement of issues on the proposed merger of Tabcorp and Tatts last week (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-merger-of-tabcorp-and-tatts" title="Tatts PR" target="_blank">media release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199217/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>) Tabcorp is heading to the Tribunal seeking authorisation fo the deal. See <a href="https://www.tabcorp.com.au/news-media/media-releases/tabcorp-to-seek-authorisation-from-the-australian" target="_blank">Tabcorp media release</a>.</p>
             <p>See further <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/tabcorp-decision-to-switch-regulators-midrace-is-being-led-by-lawyers/news-story/6887b28e07a3977ab03f8545bf682f28" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Tabcorp decision to switch regulators mid-race is being led by lawyers' (The Australian, 13 March 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/gambling/tabcorp-takes-tatts-group-merger-case-straight-to-competition-tribunal-20170313-guwodf" target="_blank">James Thomson and John Stenshold, 'Tabcorp takes Tatts Group merger case straight to Competition Tribunal' (Australian Financial Review, 13 March 2017)</a> and <a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/03/13/tabcorp-takes-tatts-bid-tribunal" target="_blank">AAP, 'Tabcorp takes Tatts bid to tribunal' (SBS, 13 March 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel proceedings dismissed</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:08:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court yesterday dismissed cartel proceedings brought by the ACCC against electrical cable manufacturers and wholesalers. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-dismisses-accc-cartel-proceedings-against-electrical-cable-manufacturers-and-wholesalers" title="ACCC cartel" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2017/2017fca0222" title="Cartel judgment Beach" target="_blank">judgment (ACCC v Olex Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 222)</a>. See further <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2017olex.html">my case page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SOI on proposed Tabcorp-Tatts merger</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:08:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has issued a statement of issues on the proposed merger of Tabcorp and Tatts. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-merger-of-tabcorp-and-tatts" title="Tatts PR" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199217/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/accc-reaction-shortens-odds-of-a-tattstabcorp-tieup/news-story/b15b946ea1c53229edc4549eedec38c2" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC reaction shortens odds of a Tass-Tabcorp tie-up' (The Australian, 9 March 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>uthorisation denied</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:08:23 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has denied authorisation for 16 insurance companies to agree to a cap on commissions paid to car dealers whho sell their insurance products. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-denies-authorisation-for-insurance-companies-to-jointly-set-a-cap-on-sales-commissions" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198584/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.             </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PT Garuda Indonesia / Air NZ High Court appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Mar 2017 14:08:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The High Court has heard appeals in PT Garuda Indonesia v ACCC and Air NZ v ACCC. A key issue revolves around the meaning of market 'in Australia'. The appeal documents as well as audio-visual recordings of the appeal can be found on the <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_s248-2016" target="_blank">High Court website</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Compliance and Enforcement Policy</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:07:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, outlined the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/compliance-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">ACCC's 2017 Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> at his annual CEDA address today. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/cca-compliance-in-interesting-times" target="_blank">transcript: 'CCA compliance in interesting times' (24 February 2017)</a>. See ACCC <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-names-key-enforcement-and-compliance-priorities-for-2017" title="ACCC Compliance MR" target="_blank">media release</a>. See also <a href="https://www.gtlaw.com.au/insights/accc-2017-compliance-and-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">Gilbert+Tobin Insights, 'The ACCC’s 2017 Compliance and Enforcement Policy – Prioritising the busy year ahead!' (24 February 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC concerns on Wollongong coal acquisition</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:07:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has published a Statement of Issues raising concerns about South32's proposed acquisition of Peabody's Metropolitan coking coal mine near Wollongong. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-south32-ltd%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-metropolitan-collieries-pty-ltd" target=_blank>ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199993/fromItemId/750991" target=_blank>merger register</a>. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/accc-raises-flag-on-south32-wollongong-coal-acquisition/news-story/f637f28fe271003ff95791a09da13397" target=_blank>Matt Chambers, 'ACCC raises flag on South32 Wollongong coal acquisition' (The Australian, 23 February 2017)</a>.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Maddocks - ACCC 2016 Year in Review</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:06:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Maddocks has published its <a href="https://www.maddocks.com.au/reading-room/accc-2016-year-review/" target="_blank">ACCC-2016 in Review</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COSBOA confirms support for effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:06:34 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Council of Small Business Australia (COSBOA) has issued a media release confirming that it supports an effects test for misuse of market power. This was released in response to comments by the ALP 'insinuating that COSBOA does not support an effects test', which COSBOA has labelled wrong and 'fake news'. See <a href="http://www.cosboa.org.au/blog/alp-on-the-right-path-next-is-effects-test/" target="_blank">COSBOA Media, 'ALP must support an effects test to have any competition credibility – and stop the fake facts' (17 February 2017)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allens client update on MMP</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:06:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>Allens &gt;&lt; Linklaters have issued a client update on the Senate Committee's support for an effects test for MMP. See '<a href="https://www.allens.com.au/pubs/comp/cucomp17feb17.htm" target="_blank">Client Update: Senate Committee Supports Proposal to Broaden the Misuse of Market Power Prohibition' (17 February 2017)</a>'</p>
         ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Economics Committee gives green light to effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/02/16/senate-green-light-effects-test/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I've posted a blog piece providing an overview and some commentary on today's Senate Economics Committee report on the misuse of market power bill. See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/02/16/senate-green-light-effects-test/" target="_blank">Julie Clarke, 'Senate Committee Gives Green Light to Effects Test' (Australian Competition Law Blog, 16 February 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Economics Committee recommends passage of misuse of market power bill</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmpbill.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p id="story-headline">The Senate Economics Committee today released its <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Misuseofmarketpower16/Report" target="_blank">report</a> on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html"><em>Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</em></a>which will, amongst other things, introduce an effects test into Australia's abuse of power laws. </p>
      <p>Labor senators dissented, claiming the effects test is 'a particularly dangerous economic policy'. Nick Xenophon, while 'broadly' supporting the committee recommendations, offered some additional comments, including once again calling for introduction of divestiture powers for breaching the misuse of market power provision. Further details to follow on <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmpbill.html">my report page.</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banks' submission in ApplePay authorisation claim published</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Durie's latest column discusses the <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D17+17239.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1201006&amp;trimFileName=D17+17239.pdf" target="_blank">banks' submission</a> responding to the A<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">CCC's draft decision</a> denying it authorisation to collectively negotiate with Apple over ApplePay. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/banks-stake-out-apple-pay-battleground-in-accc-submission/news-story/0b13c85d2cc02a20de65f27fa2f21138" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Banks stake out Apple Pay battleground in ACCC submission' (The Australian, 13 February 2017)</a>. See generally <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims confirms its review of the BP's takeover of Woolworths petrol station will be a long one</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2017 20:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an interview with the Australian, ACCC Chairman Rod Sims, has confirmed that the upcoming review of BP’s
        $1.8b acquisition of 527 Woolworths petrol station and convenience sites (<a href="http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/press/press-releases/bp-and-woolworths-partnership.html" target="_blank">announced in late December 2016</a>) will be lengthy, with local competition issues to be assessed for all of the stations stations will need to be assessed.
        
        For more details see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/acccs-sims-review-of-bp-stations-deal-will-be-long/news-story/5eb6bb615eeb990089f654437cc92781" target="_blank">Matt Chambers, 'ACCC&rsquo;s Sims: review of BP stations deal will be long' (The Australian, 9 February 2017)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Ruralco’s proposed acquisition of TP Jones</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2017 20:25:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Ruralco’s proposed acquisition of TP Jones,  both 'rural merchandise retailers based in Tasmania'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-ruralco’s-proposed-acquisition-of-tp-jones" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1200952/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple versus the banks ... Apple goes on the attack</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>Plenty of media this week generated by <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D17+9804.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1200959&amp;trimFileName=D17+9804.pdf" target="_blank">Apple's latest submission</a> in response to the <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">application by Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB and Bendigo and Adelaide Bank's for authorisation</a> to collectively bargain with and boycott Apple in relation to Apple Pay.</p>
    <p>In November last year the ACCC  issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" title="draft determination" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to deny authorisation to the banks; however, it also noted that its draft decision was 'finely balanced'. </p>
    <p><a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D17+9804.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1200959&amp;trimFileName=D17+9804.pdf" target="_blank">Apple's latest submission</a> is in response to the draft determination. It concludes bluntly that it is Apple's view that the application by the banks 'is not primarily about NFC access' but rather is 'fundamentally about the applicant banks avoiding paying
      Apple fees for use of Apple Pay ... or specifically charging their cardholders for that
      use to discourage consumer use of Apple Pay and thereby reduce competition with their own
      proprietary wallets.' Authorisation would, Apple argues, produce no public benefit but only private benefit to the banks by allowing them to 'continue to free-ride on the significant investments made by Apple ... specifically in this case on the underlying
      technology installed on Apple devices to facilitate NFC payments without paying any fees for
      transactions processed via Apple Pay's secure element infrastructure ...'</p>
    <p>For some more detail see <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2017/02/08/apple-goes-on-the-attack/" target="_blank">my blog post</a>. For a sample of recent media on this see, for example, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/financial-services/apple-claims-banks-want-digital-wallets-as-a-new-revenue-source-20170204-gu5oou" target="_blank">James Eyers, 'Apple claims banks want digital wallets as a new revenue source' (AFR, 5 February 2017)</a>; <a href="http://mashable.com/2017/02/06/apple-pay-banks-fees-australia/#tQB3mlp5Jqqi" target="_blank">Ariel Bogle, 'Apple's fight with big banks is getting even nastier, and it was already nasty' (MashableUK, 6 February 2017)</a>; <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-argues-australian-bank-bargaining-cartel-is-centred-on-fee-avoidance/" target="_blank">Asha McLean, 'Apple argues Australian bank bargaining cartel is centred on fee avoidance' (ZDNet, 6 February 2017)</a>.     </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dairy Inquiry</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is holding public inquiries in relation to the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/dairy-inquiry" target="_blank">Dairy Inquiry</a> from 6 February to 22 March 2017. It has been reported that up to 330 dairy farmers have given evidence in the first two days of ACCC hearings in Queensland and NSW.</p>
      <p>There is likely to be ongoing media on this - for a sample see <a href="http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/agribusiness/dairy/accc-dairy-inquiry-hundreds-of-dairy-farmers-give-evidence/news-story/537824b66eb6c47466d836e16f325220" target="_blank">Simone Smith, 'ACCC dairy inquiry: Hundreds of dairy farmers give evidence' (The Weekly Times, 7 February 2017)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/accc-investigating-claims-milk-processors-threatening-farmers/8246710" target="_blank">'ACCC investigating claims milk processors threatening farmers' (Radio National (audio), 7 February 2017)</a>; <a href="http://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/4453648/no-power-to-bargain-for-dairy-farmers-accc-told/?cs=4770" target="_blank">Shan Goodwin, 'No power to bargain for dairy farmers, ACCC told' (North Qld Register, 7 February 2017)</a>; <a href="http://adf.farmonline.com.au/news/magazine/industry-news/general/accc-dairy-inquiry-has-teeth/2754561.aspx" target="_blank">Shan Goodwin, 'ACCC dairy inquiry has teeth' (The Australian Dairy Farmer, 27 January 2017)</a>.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: ACCC too soft on penalties</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Feb 2017 21:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Chairman of the ACCC, Rod Sims, has argued that the ACCC has been too soft on penalties in the past. The ACCC will, in future, seek higher penalties. In addition, in response to the <a href="https://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2017/01/09/flight-centre-australian-high-court-finds-agent-competed-with-principal-and-breached-cartel-laws/" target="_blank">decision in Flight Centre</a>, which Sims claims has 'profound implications' for business, the ACCC will launch a review across the e-commerce sector. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/legal/rod-sims-says-accc-too-cautious-on-penalties-in-the-past-20170205-gu5sgc" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'Rod Sims says ACCC 'too cautious' on penalties in the past' (AFR, 5 February 2017)</a>.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC invites dairy farmers to air competition complaints</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it is 'inviting dairy farmers to share any concerns they may have about competition and fair trading at a series of public forums around the country' as part of the <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/dairy-inquiry" target="_blank">ACCC's Dairy Inquiry</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-hosting-forums-nationally-to-hear-from-dairy-farmers" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate committee submissions available</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 19:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Submissions were added progressively to the Commitee website and are available <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/sitecore/content/Home/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Misuseofmarketpower16/Submissions" target="_blank">here</a>. The Commitee is due to report on 16 February. For more information see my <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmpbill.html">report page</a>.     </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on the Woolworths decision</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:18:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Durie has an item today discussing the Woolworths unconscionable conduct decision. It includes discussion of some of the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/sitecore/content/Home/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Misuseofmarketpower16/Submissions" target="_blank">submissions to the misuse of market power Senate review</a> which have identified the decision as problematic for small business as well as more general discussion on some of the submissions. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/woolies-decision-weakens-watchdog-the-accc/news-story/66e6e0ac34529e03d97755f19ed1eae4" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Woolies decision weakens watchdog the ACCC' (The Australian, 14 January 2017)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flight Centre blog</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:18:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>I have a blog piece on the Centre for Competition Policy's blog today discussing the recent High Court decision in Flight Centre. See <a href="https://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2017/01/09/flight-centre-australian-high-court-finds-agent-competed-with-principal-and-breached-cartel-laws/" target="_blank">'Flight Centre: Australian High Court finds agent competed with principal and breached cartel laws' (Centre for Competition Policy Blog, 9 January 2017)</a>     </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pharmaceutical competition</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2017 19:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Terry Barnes has an opinion piece in today's AFR discussing the PBS, lobbying from the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and current protections from normal market competition. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/policy/health/taste-of-their-own-medicine-20170104-gtlpr6" target="_blank">Terry Barnes, 'A taste of their own medicine' (Australian Financial Review, 5 January 2017)</a> (behind pay-wall)   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petrol probe</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Michael Smith  has an item in today's AFR discussing the ACCC's examination of BP's proposed acquisition of Woolworths' petrol station network. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/long-road-ahead-for-acccs-petrol-probe-20170102-gtkms9" target="_blank">Michael Smith, 'ACCC's petrol probe a long haul' (Australian Financial Review, 3 January 2017, p 28)</a> (online version behind pay-wall).  See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/bp-snaps-up-woolies-servos-for-18-billion-20161227-gtimj7.html" target="_blank">Brian Robins, 'BP snaps up Woolworths servos for $1.8 billion' (SMH, 28 December 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/stephen-bartholomeusz/woolworths-bp-deal-a-marriage-of-convenience/news-story/75fb5e7601a683cac1744ae70369a54e" target="_blank">Stephen Bartholomeusz, 'Woolworths, BP deal a marriage of convenience' (The Australian, 28 December 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-28/woolworths-sells-fuel-business-to-bp-for-1.8b/8150610" target="_blank">Thuy Ong, 'Woolworths sells fuel business to BP for nearly $1.8b' (ABC, 28 December 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MMP Bill submissions due soon</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Reminder that submissions on the Senate Economics Committee's review of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmpbill.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> are due by 9 January 2017 with the Report expected on 16 February.     </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Statement of Issues on PMP-IPMG print merger</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:15:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER16+14204.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1200402&amp;trimFileName=MER16+14204.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> expressing initial concerns about the proposed merger between print businesses PMP (ASX:PMP) and IPMG.'  It has indicated that its 'preliminary view is that the merger may substantially lessen competition in the supply of heatset web offset printing, the main method for printing catalogues and magazines.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-pmp-ipmg-print-merger" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199419/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC closes tertiary admissions centres investigation</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:14:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announce that it has decided to discontinue its investigation into allegations by the ANU that certain tertiary admissions centres (TACs) had engaged in anti-competitive conduct. </p>
     <p>The ANU had alleged that the centres had refused to supply admission services to it 'for the purpose of preventing or restricting ANU from attracting students based in WA and SA respectively, and competing with the local tertiary institutions in those States.'  The ACCC, while recognising the alleged conduct had 'the potential to raise competition issues' nevertheless decided to 'discontinue its investigation in light of the recent Higher Education Standards Panel’s report, <a href="https://docs.education.gov.au/node/42146" target="_blank">Improving the Transparency of Higher Education Admissions Processes</a>'. the recommendations in the report, when implemented 'will improve the accessibility and comparability of information for prospective students' and 'minimise any lessening of competition arising from the alleged conduct in the future'. </p>
     <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-closes-tertiary-admissions-centres-investigation" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/accc-drops-investigation-into-tacs-anticompetitive-behaviour/news-story/65f4e2f030227b0b457724be76a5a597" target="_blank">John Ross, 'ACCC drops investigation into TACs’ ‘anti-competitive’ behaviour' (The Australian, 21 December 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/tertiary-education/accc-drops-probe-sparked-by-australian-national-universitys-complaint-of-cartel-conduct-20161221-gtga4x.html" target="_blank">Katie Burgess, 'ACCC drops probe sparked by Australian National University's complaint of cartel conduct' (Canberra Times, 22 December 2016)</a>.</p>
   ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not appeal Woolworths decision</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-won%E2%80%99t-appeal-woolworths-unconscionable-conduct-decision" target="_blank">ACCC has announced</a> it will not appeal the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2016/1472.html" target="_blank">Federal Court's decision</a> in the Woolworths case, in which it had alleged Woolworths engaged in unconscionable conduct in relation to its 'mind the gap' scheme.</p>
             <p>For a good discussion of the issues and implications of the case see <a href="https://theconversation.com/woolworths-case-loss-raises-questions-about-the-acccs-supermarket-strategy-70136" target="_blank">Alexandra Merrett, Woolworths case loss raises questions about the ACCC’s supermarket strategy (The Conversation, 13 December 2016)</a>.</p>
             <p>See also <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-08/mind-the-gap-woolworths-found-not-to-be-at-fault-against-accc/8102796" target="_blank">Sarina Locke and Mazoe Ford, 'Mind the Gap: Woolworths scheme to hit suppliers for extra payments cleared in case against ACCC' (ABC, 8 December 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny authorisation for tobacco companies</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:57:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has ' issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198125/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" title="ACCC draft tobacco" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to deny authorisation to British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco, and Philip Morris (the tobacco companies) to jointly stop supply to retailers or wholesalers they believe are supplying illicit tobacco.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-deny-authorisation-for-tobacco-companies" title="ACCC - tobacco" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198125/fromItemId/278039" title="Tobacco draft uthorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to approve cane growers collective bargaining</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced has 'issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198882/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation to Queensland Cane Growers Organisation Ltd and its local organisations (Canegrowers) for growers to collectively bargain cane supply and related contracts with millers and sugar marketers.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-approve-cane-growers-collective-bargaining" title="ACCC - cane" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198882/fromItemId/278039" title="Cane draft uthorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Success for ACCC in Flight Centre appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:15:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The High Court by majority (French CJ dissenting) has upheld the ACCC's appeal in the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre</a> case. The Court has released a <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2016/hca-49-2016-12-14.pdf" target="_blank">judgment summary</a>, together with the <a href="http://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/showCase/2016/HCA/49" target="_blank">full judgment</a>. In its summary the Court notes:</p>
     <blockquote>
       <p>'A majority of the High Court held that Flight Centre was in competition with the airlines when it
         attempted to induce each airline to agree not to discount the price at which that airline offered
         international airline tickets directly to customers. The competition was in a market for the supply,
         to customers, of contractual rights to international air carriage via the sale of airline tickets. Flight
         Centre and the airlines competed in that market'</p>
     </blockquote>
     <p>The matter is being remitted to the Federal Court for penalty. Further details to follow. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/high-court-allows-accc-appeal-in-flight-centre-attempted-price-fixing-case" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2016/12/14/high-court-flight-centre/" target="_blank">my blog on this case</a> for an overview of the findings and some comments.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Penalties imposed against ANZ and Macquirie for attempted cartel conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In November the ACCC commenced action against ANZ and Macquirie for attempted cartel conduct. The action was been taken by consent, with the parties agreeing on key facts and both banks making several admissions. Joint submissions on penalty were been made; it was proposed the ANZ should pay a penalty of $9m and Macquirie a penalty of $6m. </p>
             <p>The proposed penalties were accepted and today, in addition to cost orders, Justice Wigney imposed the following penalties (from ACCC media release; judgment not yet available):</p>
             <ul>
               <li>'$9 million against ANZ in respect of its admission that it engaged in ten instances of attempted cartel conduct in contravention of the <em>Competition and Consumer Act 2010 </em>(CCA); and</li>
               <li>$6 million against Macquarie in respect of its admission that it engaged in eight instances of attempted cartel conduct in contravention of the CCA.'</li>
             </ul>
             <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-imposes-multi-million-dollar-penalties-on-anz-and-macquarie-bank-for-attempted-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Economics Committee receiving submissions on MMP bill</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:13:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2016harper-mmp.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> was referred to the Senate Economics Committee on 1 December 2016. The Committee has called for submissions; these may be uploaded directly to the Committee review page until 9 January 2017. The Committee is due to report on 16 February 2017. View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmpbill.html">Senate Economics Committee report page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court to deliver ruling in Flight Centre next Wednesday</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:52:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The High Court has indicted it will deliver its judgment in the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre</a> case next Wednesday at 10:15.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power bill with effects test introduced</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Government has introdcued the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5788">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2016</a> into the House of Representatives. The Bill, if passed, would implement the Harper recommendations on section 46, including the introduction of an effects test.</p>
     <p>For more details and links see <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2016/12/01/mmp-bill-introduced/" target="_blank">my blog post</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New High Court appointments</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:08:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/2016-11-29/appointments-high-court-australia" target="_blank">Prime Minister today announced the appointment</a> of the <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/justices/current/justice-kiefel" target="_blank">Honourable Justice Susan Mary Kiefel AC</a> to become the next Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, and the first female Chief Justice, on 30 January 2017. Justice Kiefel will replace the <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/justices/current/chief-justice-french-ac" target="_blank">Honourable Justice Robert French AC</a> (Chief Justice since 2008) following his retirement.
       
       The Prime Minister also announced the appointment of a new High Court judge, the <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/about/judges/current-judges-appointment/current-judges/edelman-j" target="_blank">Honourable Justice James Joshua Edelman</a>, who will be sworn in on 30 January 2017. See my separate blog post on these appointments - <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2016/11/29/high-court-appointments/" target="_blank">New High Court Appointments and competition law</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny banks' application to collectively bargain over Apple Pay</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" title="draft determination" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to deny authorisation to the Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB and Bendigo and Adelaide Bank 'to collectively bargain with and boycott Apple on Apple Pay.' The ACCC have indicated the draft decision is 'finely balanced'. </p>
     <p>In its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-deny-authorisation-for-banks-to-collectively-bargain-with-and-boycott-apple-on-apple-pay" target="_blank">media release</a> the ACCC notes that the 'banks sought authorisation to bargain with Apple on two key issues:
       
       * access to the Near-Field Communication (NFC) controller in iPhones. Such access would enable the banks to offer their own integrated digital wallets to iPhone customers in competition with Apple’s digital wallet without using Apple Pay; *
       removing restrictions Apple imposes on banks preventing them from passing on fees that Apple charges the banks  for the use of its digital wallet.</p>
     <p>The banks' argument is that the conduct will 'increase the likelihood of being able to offer competing wallets on the iOS platform and pass through Apple fees, which would lead to a number of public benefits. However, the ACCC concluded the benefits claimed are 'uncertain and may be limited' and the 'proposed conduct could reduce or distort competition in a number of markets.'</p>
     <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/accc-blocks-banks-bid-to-collectively-bargain-over-apple-pay-20161128-gszmgx" target="_blank">James Eyers, 'ACCC blocks banks' bid to collectively bargain over Apple Pay' (AFR, 29 November 2016)</a>; <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/accc-rejects-nab-cba-westpac-bendigo-collective-boycott-of-apple-pay-in-draft-ruling-20161128-gszmmm.html" target="_blank">Clancy Yeats, 'ACCC rejects NAB, CBA, Westpac, Bendigo collective boycott of Apple Pay in draft ruling' (SMH, 29 November 2016)</a> and and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/accc-leans-toward-blocking-banks-from-teaming-up-over-apple-pay-dispute/news-story/ca58eb5590518fb674a05199c5259dd0" target="_blank">Daniel Palmer, 'ACCC leans toward blocking banks from teaming up over Apple Pay dispute' (The Australian, 29 November 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC takes action against ANZ and Macquirie for attempted cartel conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 08:06:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has taken action against ANZ and Macquirie for attempted cartel conduct. The action has been taken by consent, with the parties agreeing on key facts and both banks making several admissions. Joint submissions on penalty have been made; it is proposed the ANZ should pay a penalty of $9m and Macquirie a penalty of $6m. It will be for the Court to determine if the penalties are appropriate. </p>
     <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-proceedings-against-anz-and-macquarie-bank-for-attempted-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">media release</a>. See also, for example, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/anz-macquarie-bank-admit-to-cartel-conduct-20161124-gsx9dx" target="_blank">'ANZ, Macquirie Bank admit to cartel conduct' (Australian Financial Review, 25 November 2016)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Qube's acquisition of AAT</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:05:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCCC has announced it will not oppose the 'proposed acquisition by Qube Holdings Limited ... of the remaining 50 per cent of Australian Amalgamated Terminals Pty Ltd ...' following court enforceable undertakings provided by Qube which have addressed the ACCC's competition concerns. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-qube-acquisition-of-aat" title="Qube press release" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199812/fromItemId/751046" title="Qube merger" target="_blank">merger register</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC completes first Regulator Performance Framework review</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its first Regulator Performance Framework Review, in which it self assesses against six KPI's. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-completes-first-regulator-performance-framework-review" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-regulator-performance-framework-self-assessment-report-2015-16" target="_blank">report</a>. Not everyone is impressed with the self assessment; see, for example, <a href="http://competitionandconsumerprotectionlaw.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/sour-grapes-and-self-delusion-accc.html" target="_blank">Michael Terceiro, 'Sour grapes and self-delusion: ACCC Regulator Performance Framework self-assessment report 2015-16' (21 November 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/accc-cops-it-from-business-leaders-20161122-gsumbv" target="_blank">'ACCC cops it from business leaders' (Australian Financial Review, 22 November 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2016/11/business-hates-accc-good/" target="_blank">Business hates the ACCC. Good. (Macro Business, 22 November 2016)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Second criminal cartel case; charges laid against K-Line</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced that 'criminal charges have been laid against Japanese-based company Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K-Line) in relation to alleged cartel conduct concerning the international shipping of cars, trucks, and buses to Australia between July 2009 and September 2012.' This relates to the same alleged cartel conduct associated with ACCC's <a href="cases/current/2016-nsd1143-nyk.html">first cartel action in which NYK pleaded guilty</a> in July this year (a sentencing hearing is scheduled for April 2017). </p>
     <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/criminal-cartel-charges-laid-against-k-line" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/accc-faces-contest-over-shipping-cartel-case/news-story/bfc8c848ee8a0bfd7a17e05e56ad1b12" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC faces contest over shipping cartel' (The Australian, 15 November 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases statement of issues on proposed Dow/Du-Pont merger</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:03:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D16+148723.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1199443&amp;trimFileName=D16+148723.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> 'on the proposed merger of The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) and E.l. Du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont).' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-merger-of-dow-and-dupont" title="Du Pont media" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197043/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Tabcorp's proposed acquisition of Intecq</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Tabcorp's proposed acquisition of Intecq. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-tabcorp%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-intecq" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199422/fromItemId/751046" title="Tabcorp register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Whistleblowers needed in cartel proceedings</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC's Sarah Court has highlighted the importance of the immunity policy and whistleblowers for detecting cartel conduct. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/whistleblowers-crucial-to-cartel-proceedings-accc-20161031-gsevx4.html" target="_blank">Sarah Danckert, 'Whistleblowers crucial to cartel proceedings: ACCC' (SMH, 1 November 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC investigating concerns about anti-competitive activity in the beef and cattle industry</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 08:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has today released the interim report for its Cattle and Beef market study, identifying key areas in which competitiveness of beef and cattle markets could be improved and highlighting concerns about anti-competitive conduct and market structures. </p>
     <p>View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/cattle-and-beef-study-reveals-price-transparency-issues-and-allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-accc" title="Media cattle" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View <a href="http://accc.gov.au/publications/cattle-and-beef-market-study-interim-report" target="_blank">market study interim report</a>. See also my <a href="reports/2016cattle.html">Cattle and Beef market studies page</a>.</p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-investigates-claims-of-anticompetitive-activity-in-cattle-yards-20161031-gselxh.html" target="_blank">Brian Robins, 'ACCC investigates claims of anti-competitive activity in cattle yards' (SMH, 31 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/an-accc-bull-enters-the-saleyard/news-story/20ad0f8cfccb6dc7fdbf6c19a5d253a5#itm=taus%7Cnews%7Caus_authors_index%7C3%7Cauthors_storyBlock_headline%7CJohn_Durie%7Cindex%7Cauthor&amp;itmt=1478038998504" target="_blank">John Durie, 'An ACCC bull enters the saleyard' (The Australian, 31 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columnists/accc-chases-cowboy-cartels-20161031-gsersx" target="_blank">Matthew Stevens, 'ACCC chases cowboy cartels' (AFR, 31 October 2016)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on the concentration of the Australian economy</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has discussed increasing concentration in the Australian Economy at the RBB Economics Conference in Sydney. He questioned the view that we need not be concerned with heavy concentration, instead preferring 'standard economic wisdom' that 'mergers resulting in high levels of concentration in markets with substantial barriers to entry will usually reduce competition and cause harm to consumers and our economy.' He then raised a series of questions, including whether we need to consider establishing a 'rebuttable presumption' that mergers should not proceed where they are likely to significantly increase competition in a defined market. </p>
     <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-discusses-the-increasing-concentration-in-australia%E2%80%99s-economy-0" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/keynote-address-rbb-economics-conference-0" target="_blank">Read the speech</a>.</p>
     <p>For related media see, for example, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/oct/27/australians-will-pay-the-price-for-dominance-of-big-companies-says-accc-chief?CMP=share_btn_tw" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'Australians will pay the price for dominance of big companies, says ACCC Chief' (The Guardian, 27 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/accc-boss-rod-sims-hits-out-at-damaging-mergers-20161026-gsb699" target="_blank">Jacob Greber, 'ACCC boss Rod Sims hits out at damaging mergers' (AFR, 27 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-chairman-rod-sims-puts-the-case-for-a-default-no-to-big-mergers-20161026-gsbebd.html" target="_blank">Peter Martin, 'ACCC chairman Rod Sims puts the case for a default 'no' to big mergers' (SMH, 27 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-27/market-concentration-concern-accc/7970502" target="_blank">Phillip Lasker, 'ACCC's Rod Sims says big company domination is leaving Australian consumers 'worse off'' (ABC, 27 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/acccs-sims-warns-top-firms-tightening-grip-on-economy/news-story/650ffa6931d7f20ab57941cfb401a006" target="_blank">David Uren, 'ACCC's Sims warns top firms tightening grip on economy' (The Australian, 27 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/robert-gottliebsen/beware-the-concentration-of-corporate-power/news-story/3dc27031832c1d489687098a3739c50b" target="_blank">Robert Gottliebsen, 'Beware the concentration of corporate power' (The Australian, 27 October 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/accc-warns-of-greater-scrutiny-amid-rising-levels-of-business-concentration/news-story/442b1e2f57dc403285fce3f5a78c49e0" target="_blank">Daniel Palmer, 'ACCC warns of greater scrutiny amid rising levels of business concentration' (The Australian, 27 October 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Australian Paper's proposed acquisition of Edwards Dunlop Office Products</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:21:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose Australian Paper's proposed acquisition of the Edwards Dunlop Office Products division (EDOP) of BJ Ball.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-australian-papers-proposed-acquisition-of-edwards-dunlop-office-products" title="AP media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1199191/fromItemId/751046" title="AP public register" target="_blank">public register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court grants leave to appeal in Air NZ/PT Garuda Indonesia cases</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:20:59 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>On 14 October the High Court granted Air New Zealand and PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd special leave to appeal the decision in <a href="cases/2014airnz.html">ACCC v P T Garuda Indonesia Ltd [2016] FCAFC 42</a>. The central issue relates to the meaning of market in Australia (<a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca4E.html">s 4E</a>). Both matters will be heard together. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/HCATrans/2016/245.html" target="_blank">High Court transcript</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SoI on proposed acquisition of Pillar by Link</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:20:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'a Statement of Issues on the possible acquisition of the Superannuation Administration Corporation (trading as Pillar) by Link Administration Holdings Limited (ASX:LNK) (Link). Pillar is being privatised by the NSW Government.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-soi-on-proposed-acquisition-of-pillar-by-link" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197870/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mardirossian and Lees on misuse of market power proposal</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:20:31 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Arnold Bloch Leibler partners, Zaven Mardirossian and Matthew Lees, have an opinion piece in today's <em>Australian </em>criticising the breadth of the proposed misuse of market power law and proposing changes. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-legislation-must-leave-no-room-for-doubt/news-story/4199531b94b66c38895a7f7baff98f7a" target="_blank">Zaven Mardirossian and Matthew Lees, 'Harper legislation must leave no room for doubt' (The Australian, 12 October 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SoI on proposed acquisition of APNs regional media division from News Corp</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:20:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a Statement of Issues on the 'proposed acquisition of Australian Regional Media (ARM) from APN News and Media ... by News Corporation'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-invites-feedback-on-news-corporation%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-apns-australian-regional-media-division" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1196597/fromItemId/750991" title="Merger Newscorp" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/diversity-key-to-apnnews-deal-says-accc-boss-rod-sims/news-story/217af93b4fe8b60274ea042f804c3bef" target="_blank">Darren Davidson, 'Diversity key to APN-News deal, says ACCC boss Rod Sims' (The Australian, 7 October 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Graincorp's proposed acquisition of Cargill's Gilgandra grain storage and handling facility</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:20:03 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose 'GrainCorp Limited’s (GrainCorp) proposed acquisition of Cargill Australia Limited’s (Cargill) bulk grain storage and handling facility in Gilgandra, New South Wales.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-graincorp%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-cargill%E2%80%99s-gilgandra-grain-storage-and-handling-facility" title="ACCC Graincorp MR" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198892/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SoI on proposed Glencore Rail acquisition</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:19:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has 'released a combined Statement of Issues on alternative proposals to acquire Glencore Coal’s rail business, GRail, by Aurizon ... and Pacific National.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-aurizon-and-pacific-national%E2%80%99s-competing-proposals-to-acquire-grail" title="ACCC Glencore Media" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197789/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Pacific National merger register page</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197585/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Aurizon merger register page</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/the-accc-stays-on-track-with-release-of-statements-of-issues/news-story/a09320c76ce6cd5c2130d65ccb39d29e" target="_blank">John Durie, 'The ACCC stays on track with release of statements of issues' (The Australian, 6 October 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition in retail banking</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:18:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Rob Nicholls has an item in today's Conversation on the promotion of competition in retail banking. </p>
     <p>See <a href="https://theconversation.com/simpler-account-switching-would-help-keep-our-banks-honest-66264" target="_blank">Rob Nicholls, 'Simpler account switching would help keep our banks honest' (The Conversation, 4 October 2016).</a>   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speaks at CommsDay Congress</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:18:25 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>In a speak at the CommsDay Congress in Melbourne today, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, outlined the ACCC's 'market study into the communications sector and the linked declaration inquiry into domestic mobile roaming' as well as discussing the need for better broadband speed information. See: </p>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/keynote-address-commsday-congress" target="_blank">speech to CommsDay Melbourne Congress</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/market-studies/communications-sector-market-study" target="_blank">market study into communications sector</a></li>
      <li><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-invites-industry-comment-on-%E2%80%98complex-fascinating-and-vital%E2%80%99-telecommunications-issues" target="_blank">press release: 'ACCC invites industry comment on ‘complex, fascinating and vital’ telecommunications issues'</a></li>
    </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Resale price maintenance in Australia</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:18:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Jones Day's Nick Taylor and Prudence Smith have a piece in the Kluwer Competition Law Blog today discussing proposed changes to Australia's resale price maintenance laws. See <a href="http://kluwercompetitionlawblog.com/2016/10/03/australia-experiments-with-a-third-way-on-resale-price-restrictions/" target="_blank">Nick Taylor and Prudence Smith, 'Australia experiments with a &quot;third way&quot; on resale price restrictions' (Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 3 October 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Consultation time extended for some aspects of Exposure Draft Bill</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:58:47 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Treasury has extended the deadline for submissions on all aspects of the <a href="reports/2016harper-exposure.html">Exposure Draft bill</a>, other than those relating to misuse of market power, which are still due by 30 September. The extended deadline for other aspects of the bill is 28 October 2016. See also <a href="https://consult.treasury.gov.au/market-and-competition-policy-division/ed_competition_law_amendments" target="_blank">Treasury consultation page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Chairman attacks criticism of proposed misuse of market power changes</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:58:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has again defended the proposed introduction of an 'effects test' for misuse of market power (s 46), claiming that criticisms offered by Woolworths, Coles and their supporters made no sense. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/enhancing-competition-in-retail" target="_blank">speech to AFR Retail Summit, Melbourne, 'Enhancing competition in retail'</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/retail/accc-chairman-rod-sims-takes-swipe-at-coles-and-woolworths-20160928-grqb8l.html" target="_blank">Sarah Danckert, 'ACCC chairman Rod Sims takes swipe at Coles and Woolworths' (The Age, 28 September 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Vocus' proposed acquisition of Nextgen </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:58:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has announced 'it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Vocus Communications ... of Nextgen Networks Group Pty Ltd and two development projects: the Australian Singapore Cable and the North West Cable System (together, Nextgen).' The ACCC found the services offered by each party were largely complementary and, where overlap existed, the competitive constraint from Telstra, Optus and TPG would likely limit any harm to competition. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-vocus-communications%E2%80%99-move-on-nextgen" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198600/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Seven West Media's proposed acquisitions of The Sunday Times and perthnow.com.au</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:57:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose proposed acquisition. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-seven-west-media%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-the-sunday-times-and-perthnowcomau" title="Seven West Media" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1198464/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">public register</a>. </p>
     <p>See also '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-15/sunday-times-newspaper-and-perth-now-takeover-approved-by-accc/7845380" target="_blank">Sunday Times sale to The West Australian owner Seven West Media receives ACCC approval' (ABC News, 15 September 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/accc-lets-seven-west-buy-news-corps-perth-paper-as-readers-advertisers-go-online-20160914-grgo6z.html" target="new">Lucy Battersby, 'ACCC lets Seven West buy News Corp's Perth paper as readers, advertisers go online' (SMH, 15 September 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/accc-clears-seven-wests-acquisition-of-west-australian-media-outlets/news-story/e6f264707f472efa67aa08e7e5075fad" target="_blank">John Durie and Daniel Palmer, 'ACCC clears Seven West’s acquisition of West Australian media outlets' (The Australian, 15 September 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/seven-west-worthy-custodians-of-perths-the-sunday-times/news-story/acde071e9a7e36789983244436b7a2f6" target="_blank">Jake Mitchell, 'Seven West ‘worthy custodians’ of Perth’s The Sunday Times' (The Australian, 16 September 2016)</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC updates guidance on use of mandatory information gathering powers</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:57:34 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released updated <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-guidelines-use-of-s-155-powers" target="_blank">Guidelines on the Use of section 155 powers</a>, 'with particular focus on the use of s 155 powers in the ACCC's enforcement and merger activities'. </p>
    <p>Given proposed changes to s 155 powers in the <a href="reports/2016harper-exposure.html">Exposure Draft</a> legislation - including in the form of a proposed reasonable search defence - the ACCC has indicated it will update the Guidance again to take account of those changes if and when passed. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-updates-guidance-material-on-information-gathering-powers" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exposure Draft Legislation - markup version of CCA</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:12:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>I have prepared a mark-up version of the current Act incorporating the amendments proposed by the Exposure Draft legislation. </p>
     <ul>
       <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/markup/CCA-ExposureDraft-Markup.pdf">CCA 2010 amended in accordance with Exposure Draft Bill (mark-up showing)</a> (PDF)</li>
       <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/markup/CCA-ExposureDraft-Markup-Clean.pdf">CCA 2010 amended in accordance with Exposure Draft Bill (clean)</a> (PDF)</li>
     </ul>
     <p>See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016harper-exposure.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2016 (Exposure Draft)</a> (report page).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exposure Draft Legislation</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:52:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2016/09/05/harper-exposure-draft/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The exposure draft legislation implementing the bulk of the Harper competition law reform recommendations was released today. I've provided an overview on my blog - <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/blog/2016/09/05/harper-exposure-draft/" target="_blank">Harper Exposure Draft Legislation Released</a> - and the following pages will progressively add detail:</p>
             <ul>
               <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016harper-exposure.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2016 (Exposure Draft)</a> (report page)</li>
               <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016accc-mmp.html">ACCC consultation on ACCC Draft Framework for misuse of market power guidelines</a></li>
               <li><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016accc-concerted.html">ACCC consultation on ACCC Draft Framework for concerted practices guidelines</a></li>
           
             </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government releases exposure draft of Harper competition reform bill</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2016 12:14:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016harper-exposure.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Government released an <a href="https://consult.treasury.gov.au/market-and-competition-policy-division/ed_competition_law_amendments" target="_blank">exposure draft</a> of the Harper reform bill today. See <a href="https://consult.treasury.gov.au/market-and-competition-policy-division/ed_competition_law_amendments" target="_blank">Treasury page</a>. Submissions are due by 30 September. </p>
     <p>See further my review page on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016harper-exposure.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2016 (Exposure Draft)</a>. </p>
]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks feedback on framework for guidance on competition law reforms</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2016 12:14:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Government released an exposure draft of the Harper reform bill today and the ACCC has  released a framework for guidance on how it proposes to approach the <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/consultation-on-draft-framework-for-misuse-of-mark" target="_blank">proposed change to s 46</a> and the <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/legal-economic/draft-framework-for-concerted-practices-guidelines" target="_blank">proposed creation of a prohibition against anti-competitive concerted practices</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-feedback-on-a-framework-for-guidance-on-competition-law-reforms" title="harper accc" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases issues paper for communications sector market study</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2016 12:14:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today released an <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Comms%20Market%20Study%20-%20Issues%20Paper%20-%20September%202016.pdf" target="_blank">issues paper</a> to begin seeking feedback as part of its market study on the communications sector. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-issues-paper-for-communications-sector-market-study" title="communications" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/market-studies/communications-sector-market-study" title="consultation hub communications" target="_blank">consultation hub</a>. Submissions close on 14 October. A draft report is expected July-August 2017 and a final report in November 2017.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC commences inquiry into whether to declare a wholesale domestic mobile roaming service</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Sep 2016 12:14:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC is today commencing 'an inquiry into whether or not to declare a wholesale domestic mobile roaming service.

Access to a roaming service would enable mobile service providers to provide coverage for their customers in areas where they don’t have their own network.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-consider-declaration-of-mobile-roaming" title="roaming" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expedia and Booking.com agree to amend contracts with Australian hotels</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:45:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Following an investigation by the ACCC, Expedia and Booking.com have each agreed to amend 'price and availability parity clauses in their contracts with Australian hotels and accommodation providers.' In particular, from 1 September, both companies have removed the following contractual requirements for Australian accommodation providers to:</p>
     <ul>
       <li>'offer room rates that are equal to or lower than those offered on any other online travel agent</li>
       <li>offer room rates that are equal to or lower than those offered on an accommodation provider’s offline channels         </li>
       <li>make all remaining room inventory available         </li>
       <li>offer the same number and same type of rooms offered to any other online travel agent.'</li>
     </ul>
     <p>Consultation with the online accommodation sector, which took place in September 2015, generated more than 500 responses. See <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/communications/online-accommodation-booking-sector/consult_view" target="_blank">consultation hub</a>.</p>
     <p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/expedia-and-bookingcom-agree-to-reinvigorate-price-competition-by-amending-contracts-with-australian-hotels" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks comments on draft media merger guidelines</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:45:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/mergers-and-adjudication/draft-media-merger-guidelines" target="_blank">draft version of its updated Media Merger Guidelines</a> and is seeking comments before finalising the guidelines (due 14 October 2016). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-comments-on-its-draft-guidelines-for-assessing-media-mergers" title="Media guideline accc" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.  </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny authorisation of real estate advertising collective negotiations</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:43:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195336/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> 'proposing to deny authorisation to Property Media Group Pty Ltd (PMG)' to 'collectively bargain and boycott suppliers of online and print real estate advertising, including realestate.com.au and domain.com.au.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-deny-authorisation-of-real-estate-advertising-collective-negotiations" title="Media release PMG">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195336/fromItemId/278039" title="authorisation PMG" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie: Proposed Harper amendments expected to be released 'some time soon'</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:38:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In his column today, John Durie notes that Scott Morrison has 'assumed the role as key minister for the ACCC in charge of competition policy matters' and that proposed Harper amendments were back with him 'late last week and will be issued publicly for comment some time soon' with the aim to have the law in parliament 'by year's end'. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/paul-omalleys-bluescope-in-fine-form/news-story/3ce684d56726f18b6753705d5ef30da6" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Paul O'Malley's BlueScope in fine form' (The Australian, 23 August 2016)</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Glance on why the ACCC should not grant the banks' request to collectively bargain with Apple</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:37:54 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>David Glance, Director of UWA Centre for Software Practice, provides his take on why granting the banks authorisation to collectively negotiate with Apple would not be in the consumers' interests. </p>
    <p>See <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-the-accc-siding-with-the-banks-against-apple-will-not-be-in-consumers-interests-64220" target="_blank">David Glance, 'Why the ACCC siding with the banks against Apple will not be in consumers' interests' (The Conversation, 22 August 2016)</a>. </p>
  ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banks denied interim authorisation to collectively bargain with Apple</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:20:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has denied the application by several banks for <em>interim authorisation</em> to collectively bargain with Apple. The ACCC will continue to assess the applications for authorisation. A draft decision is expected in October with a decision to follow within six months of the original application (made on 26 July 2016). 
<p>In its <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target=_blank>decision denying <em>interim authorisation</em></a><em> </em>the ACCC briefly noted that, after considering factors relevant to granting interim authorisation (set out in its decision) it was not appropriate to grant interim authorisation at this time. In particular, the ACCC noted that 'the applications raise complex issues for consideration' which require further market consultation, with the result that at this time 'the ACCC does not have sufficient information to form a view on the likely public benefits and public detriments of the proposed conduct or the possible harm to consumers.' </p>
<p>The ACCC further noted that it did not 'see compelling reasons to support the urgency of the application' and expressed concern that 'the proposed conduct has the potential for continuing impacts on competition, even if any arrangements reached are later unwound.'</p>
<p>See <a title="bank media release" href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-continues-its-review-of-banks’-application-for-authorisation-to-collectively-bargain-with-apple" target=_blank>ACCC media release</a>. See <a title="bank authorisation" href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039" target=_blank>authorisation register</a>.</p>
<div></div>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KWM on the new Access Undertakings Guidelines</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:19:53 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>KWM's Elouise Davis has an item on the ACCC's new <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/part-iiia-access-undertaking-guidelines" target="_blank">Part IIIA Access Undertaking Guidelines</a>. See <a href="http://incompetition.com.au/2016/08/accc-publishes-part-iiia-access-undertakings-guidelines/#page=1" target="_blank">Elouise Davis, ACCC Publishes Part IIIA Access Undertakigns Guidelines' (<em>In Competition</em>, 16 August 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases guidelines for Part IIIA Access undertakings and for Part XIC declaration provisions</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:19:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released two new guidelines today. The first is the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/part-iiia-access-undertaking-guidelines" target="_blank">Part IIIA Access Undertaking Guidelines</a>. The release of these followed a <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/part-iiia-access-undertaking-guidelines-1/" target="_blank">four week public consultation period</a> on a draft in May-June 2016. The second is the ACCC's <a href="https://accc.gov.au/publications/guideline-for-part-xic-declaration-provisions-for-telecommunication-services" target="_blank">Guideline for Part XIC Declaration Provisions for Telecommunications Services</a>. These update the previous 1999 Guidelines and reflect changes to legislation - they also follow a consultation period in June-July this year. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposals for Port of Melbourne Lease</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:05:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose two separate proposals to acquire the 50 year lease of the Port of Melbourne. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-proposals-for-port-of-melbourne-lease" title="Port media" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197740/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register for IFM, APF and MIRA consortium proposed acquisition</a> and merger register for <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197737/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">QIC, GIP and Borealis consortium proposed acquisition</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose JB Hi-Fi's proposed acquisition of the Good Guys</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:23:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose JB Hi-Fi's proposed acquisition of the Good Guys. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-jb-hi-fi-move-on-the-good-guys" title="Media Good Guys" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197747/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register for more details</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple versus the banks: Apple responds</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:22:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Late last month several Australian banks (CBA, NAB, Westpac, Bendigo and Adelaide Bank) asked the ACCC for permission to collectively negotiate with Apple to get their digital wallets onto iPhones. Apple has recently responded with <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D16+108933.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1197693&amp;trimFileName=D16+108933.pdf" target="_blank">its own submission to the ACCC's review</a>. </p>
     <p>The submission notes that Apple will provide a 'separate and comprehensive submission' at a later date, but makes a number of key points, urging ACCC to reject the banks' application for interim authorisation. Apple claims that the banks seeking authorisation view Apple Pay as a 'competitive threat' and that this is based on their 'limited understanding of the offering' and a desire to 'maintain complete control over their customers' and that the application represents a tactic to 'blunt Apple's entry into the Australian market'.</p>
     <p>The submission then notes that a collective boycott is a 'hard-core breach' of the Act and would 'slow innovation and reduce choice'. Apple suggests there are no public interest justifications supporting the application. In particular, it argues that giving the banks simple access to its NFC antenna would 'fundamentally diminish the high level of security Apple aims to have' on its devices. It suggests interim authorisation would be inappropriate in the circumstances and the normal six month statutory assessment period should apply.</p>
     <p>See, <a href="http://www.afr.com/technology/apple-says-australias-banks-pose-a-security-threat-to-iphones-20160809-gqogpr" target="_blank">James Eyers, 'Apple says Australia's banks pose a security threat to iPhones' (AFR, 10 August 2016)</a> and <a href="https://www.finder.com.au/apple-tells-australian-banks-your-security-isnt-good-enough" target="_blank">Angus Kidman, 'The war over access to Apple Pay and NFC looks set to run and run' (Finder,com.au)</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039" title="Apple Banks" target="_blank">ACCC authorisation register</a>, including Apples submissions and submissions by other interested parties.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims' update on ACCC activities</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:22:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has delivered a speech at the Law Council's Competition and Consumer Workshop, providing an update on the ACCC's court actions, mergers and market studies. See media release, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-reports-on-key-court-actions-mergers-and-market-studies" target="_blank">ACCC Chairman reports on key court actions, mergers and market studies</a>' and speech (<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/chairmans-address-to-the-law-council-workshop" target="_blank">Chairman's address to the Law Council Workshop</a>). </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Woolley argues Sims was wrong to go cold on privatisation</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:22:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Infrastructure Australia board member, Kerry Schott, has argued that ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, rather thatn criticising privatisations, should be selling their economic benefits. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/rod-sims-wrong-to-go-cold-on-privatisations-20160805-gqltc0" target="_blank">Mark Ludlow, 'Rod Sims wrong to go cold on privatisations' (AFR, 5 August 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/privatisation-needs-smarter-regulation" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Privatisation needs smarter regulation' (Media release, 4 August 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Peter Anderson on monopolists and exploiters</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:22:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Former head of the ACCI, Peter Anderson, speaking at the Law Council workshop, has blamed business for lack of progress in market-opening reforms - see <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/exacci-chief-slams-monopolists-and-exploiters-20160804-gql7cw" target="_blank">Ben Potter, 'Ex-ACCI chief slams monopolists and exploiters'</a> (AFR, 4 August 2016).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to undertake market study of communications sector</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:21:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced that its next market study will focus on the communications sector. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-undertake-market-study-of-the-communications-sector" title="Market studies media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/market-studies/communications-sector-market-study" target="_blank">communications sector market studies page</a>. See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/media-and-marketing/accc-to-undertake-major-telecommunications-study-20160804-gqkziv" target="_blank">Max Mason, 'ACCC to undertake major telecommunications study' (AFR, 4 August 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/watchdog-looks-to-the-postnbn-telecoms-future/news-story/c58ae7cea4b2dfc0d3e68d7c9e4b62e3" target="_blank">Supratim Adhikari, 'Watchdog looks to the post-NBN telecoms future' (The Australian, 5 August 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SOI on proposed acquisition of Sunday Times and Perthnow by Seven West Media</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:21:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC today released a Statement of Issues on the proposed acquisition of <em>The Sunday Times </em>and perthnow.com.au by West Australian Newspapers (wholly owned subsidiary of Seven West Media). The ACCC is investigating the impact on readers and advertisers. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-invites-feedback-on-seven-west-media%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-the-sunday-times-and-perthnow" target="_blank">ACCC Media Release - ACCC invites feedback on Seven West Media’s proposed acquisition of The Sunday Times and Perthnow</a> and the ACCC <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1196053/fromItemId/750991" title="Media merger register" target="_blank">Merger Register</a>.</p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/media-and-marketing/publishing/accc-analyses-seven-west-medias-sunday-times-acquisition-20160804-gqkr5a" target="_blank">Max Mason and Julie-anne Sprague, 'ACCC analyses Seven West Media's Sunday Times acquisition' (AFR, 4 August 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sea Swift reasons available</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:19:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Tribunal's reasons for their authorisation decision in  Sea Swift are now available (all 110 pages) on <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/ACompT/2016/9.html" title="AustLII sea swift" target="_blank">AustLII</a> or <a href="https://jade.io/article/486259" title="Jade Sea Swift" target="_blank">Jade</a>. See also <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations#list" title="Tribunal Sea Swift" target="_blank">Tribunal authorisation page</a> for all relevant non-confidential documentation.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court transcript in Flight Centre</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:19:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The 76 page High Court transcript in the Flight Centre appeal (heard last Wednesday) is now available (<a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/HCATrans/2016/167.html" target="_blank">AustLII</a> or <a href="https://jade.io/article/486140" target="_blank">JADE</a>). See also the <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_b15-2016" target="_blank">High Court case page</a> or <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">my case page</a> for more details.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on government immunity from competition law</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2016 09:19:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ben Potter has an item in today's AFR, following on from ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims' comments on privatisation. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/rod-sims-wants-to-end-government-immunity-from-competition-law-20160729-gqgvoz" target="_blank">Ben Potter, 'Rod Sims wants to end government immunity from competition law' (AFR, 31 July 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC declares superfast broadband access service</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:18:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC today <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/superfast-broadband-access-service-declaration-inquiry/final-decision" title="SBAS final decision" target="_blank">declared a five year superfast broadband access service (SBAS)</a> which 'allows retailers to access non-NBN network services with a downstream data rate normally more than 25 Mbps. This includes the fibre-to-the-basement (FTTB) network operated by TPG subsidiary AAPT, and Telstra’s fibre networks in South Brisbane and Velocity estates'.</p>
             <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/superfast-broadband-networks-opened-up-to-competition-through-accc-declaration" title="ACCC SBAS" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/superfast-broadband-access-service-declaration-inquiry" title="SBAS inquiry" target="_blank">SBAS declaration inquiry page</a>. See also, for example, <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/accc-to-regulate-super-fast-broadband-for-next-five-years/" target="_blank">Corinne Reichert, 'ACCC to regulate super-fast broadband for next five years' (ZDNet, 29 July 2016)</a>.</p> ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:40:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-mmp.html" target="_blank">effects test for misuse of market power</a> (recommended in the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper.html" target="_blank">Harper Report</a> and <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/2016-03-16/joint-media-statement-fixing-competition-policy-drive-economic-growth-and-jobs" target="_blank">accepted by the Government in March this year</a>) has had a bit of a run in the media over the last week. </p>
     <p>This was prompted the release of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016agriculture.html">Productivity Commission's draft report on the regulation of agriculture</a> last Thursday, which suggested the effects test would do nothing to shield farmers from competition in the retail grocery market and that, even if it did, this would not be in the interest of consumers.</p>
     <p>This generated a <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/morrison-back-nationals-over-productivity-commission-on-farm-red-tape-20160721-gqahcb" target="_blank">quick response from Treasurer Scott Morrison</a>, reinforcing the Government's commitment to implementing the Harper Panel's proposed effects test.</p>
     <p>In response to big business criticism of the test and suggestions that it was in any way 'protectionist', ACCC Chairman, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-slams-big-business-for-effects-test-distortion/news-story/853198f8a750acc671597cb50108f218" target="_blank">Rod Sims, came out swinging</a>, labelling any such suggestions 'bullshit'. Opposition Competition Spokesman, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/andrew-leigh-criticises-rod-sims-over-effects-test-claims/news-story/740eb33c75fa26314113fd81c5afa0ca" target="_blank">Andrew Leigh, was quick to respond</a>, suggesting that Sims' critique of the critique was simply 'wrong' and would represent the end of the world (ok, he didn't go that far, but he did label it 'wrong', pointed to previous reviews rejecting an effects test and suggested it would somehow lead to higher grocery bills for regional consumers).</p>
     <p>In response to to the response to the response, the Review's Chair, Prof Ian Harper, rejected Leigh's criticism of the reform and claimed those suggesting that the test was protectionist in any way were turning 'reality on its head' and 'almost' wilfully misinterpreting the proposal: see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/ian-harper-slams-effects-test-reform-critics-for-distortion/news-story/88b17e5fc72f568fd15a9de49ee28437" target="_blank">Michael Roddan, 'Ian Harper slams 'effects test' reform critics for distortion' (The Australian, 26 July 2016)</a>.</p>
     <p>Abuse of power legislation and reform is controversial everywhere, but it's leading to some positively bizarre claims and commentary in Australia at the moment; let's just hope that Government introduces exposure draft legislation on so that we can move ...</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple versus the banks</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:42:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Several Australian banks (CBA, NAB, Westpac, Bendigo and Adelaide Bank) have asked the ACCC for permission to collectivley negotiate with Apple to get their digital wallets onto iPhones. Apple has so far locked out third-party providers. ANZ has negotiated access to Apple Pay. </p>
     <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197444/fromItemId/278039" title="Apple Banks" target="_blank">ACCC authorisation register</a>, including the 121 page authorisation application which states, in part:</p>
     <blockquote>
       <p>[para 2] The applicants seek authorisation on behalf of themselves and potentially other credit and
         debit card issuers to engage in limited collective negotiation with providers of third-party
         mobile wallet services on conditions relating to competition, best practice standards, and
         efficiency and transparency. The applicants also seek authorisation to enter into a limited
         form of collective boycott in relation to a third-party mobile wallet provider while collective
         negotiations with that provider are ongoing.</p>
     </blockquote>
     <p>See also, for example, <a href="http://www.afr.com/technology/mobiles-and-tablets/apple/australian-banks-take-on-apple-over-digital-wallets-20160726-gqe4ad" target="_blank">James Eyers, 'Australian banks take on Apple over digital wallets' (AFR, 27 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/banks-team-up-in-apple-pay-talks-20160726-gqdzhr.html" target="_blank">Clancy Yeates, 'Banks team up in Apple Pay talks' (SMH, 27 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/27/fruit_phobic_fat_cats_learn_to_herd_waddle_in_pathetic_protest_towards_cupertinos_cream_bowl/" target="_blank">Richard Chirgwin, 'Australian Banks ask permission to form anti-Apple cartel' (The Register, 27 July 2016)</a> ('You can't make it up'), <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/apple-pay-deal-could-deliver-accounts-to-anz-bank-20160428-goh9qy" target="_blank">James Eyers, 'Apple Pay deal could deliver accounts to ANZ Bank' (AFR, 28 April 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/breaking-news/anz-pulled-fast-one-on-apple-pay/news-story/f559df72dc610d2e8c7e9fcea10dd571" target="_blank">Stuart Condie, 'ANZ 'pulled fast one' on Apple Pay' (news.com.au, 27 July 2016)</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on privatisation</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:39:54 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Speaking at the Melbourne Economic Forum on Tuesday, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, previously a strong advocate for privatisation as a mechanism for enhancing economic efficiency, has now indicated that he as 'at the point of almost opposing privatisation' because the manner in which they have been conducted (to maximise sale proceeds) has led to price increases. </p>
     <p>Listen to radio interview on <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/rod-sims-changes-his/7663718" target="_blank">RN Breakfast at: 'ACCC's Rod Sims changes his tune on privatisation' (27 July 2016)</a>. </p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-26/accc-boss-says-privatisation-costing-consumers/7662194" target="_blank">Stephen Letts, 'ACCC boss says privatisation costing consumers and damaging economic reform' (ABC, 26 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/acccs-rod-sims-exasparated-as-privatisations-increase-prices-20160726-gqdyjv" target="_blank">Ben Potter, 'ACCC's Rod Sims 'exasperated' as privatisations 'increase prices'
       
       (AFR, 26 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/privatisation-has-damaged-the-economy-says-accc-chief-20160726-gqe2c2.html" target="_blank">Patrick Hatch, 'Privatisation has damaged the economy, says ACCC chief' (SMH, 27 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/transport/why-accc--boss-rod-sims-lost-it-with-privatisation-20160727-gqenbb" target="_blank">Ben Potter, 'Why ACCC boss Rod Sims lost it with privatisation' (AFR, 27 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/finance/economy/72477-privatisation-is-lifting-prices-and-hurting-the-economy-accc-chief-rod-sims/" target="_blank">Eloise Keating, 'Privatisation is lifting prices and hurting the economy: ACCC chief Rod Sims' (Smart Company, 27 July 2016)</a> and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/jul/27/acccs-rod-sims-says-privatisations-severely-damaging-economy" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'ACCC's Rod Sims says privatisations 'severely damaging' economy' (The Guardian, 27 July 2016)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court to hear ACCC v Flight Centre appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:36:03 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court will hear the ACCC's appeal in the Flight Centre case from 10:15 this morning in Brisbane. See <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_b15-2016" target="_blank">High Court case page for details</a>. See my <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre case page</a> for details of earlier judgments and links to relevant commentary. </p>
<p>This hearing will follow the delivery of the much awaited judgment in <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_m219-2015" target="_blank">Paciocco and ANZ</a> (at 10am) on the issue of whether late bank fees constitute penalties and/or are unconscionable. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC raids CFMEU headquarters as part of probe into allegations of price fixing</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:39:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It has been reported that the ACCC raided the Canberra office of the Construction Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) this morning as part of its probe into an allegation of price fixing between union officials and employers. See, for example, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/accc-raid-on-cfmeu-headquarters-in-canberra-20160726-gqe3ct" target="_blank">Ewin Hannan, 'ACCC raid on CFMEU headquarters in Canberra' (AFR, 26 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/accc-raids-cfmeu-offices-in-canberra-as-part-of-price-fixing-inquiry-20160726-gqdxg6.html" target="_blank">Megan Gorrey, 'ACCC raids CFMEU offices in Canberra as part of price fixing inquiry' (The Canberra Times, 26 July 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-26/accc-executing-search-warrant-at-cfmeu-act-headquarters/7661568" target="_blank">'ACCC raiding CFMEU's Canberra headquarters, branch secretary says' (ABC News, 26 July 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects test criticism 'bullshit': Sims</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:06:47 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has labeled claims that the proposed reforms to s 46 are protectionist 'bullshit', claiming the only protectionism 'is that of large companies not wanting to face competition'. In response, opposition spokesman on competition, Andrew Leigh, criticised Sims' comments as simply 'wrong'. </p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-slams-big-business-for-effects-test-distortion/news-story/853198f8a750acc671597cb50108f218" target="_blank">Michael Roddan, 'ACCC slams big business for effects test distortion' (The Australian, 25 July 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/andrew-leigh-criticises-rod-sims-over-effects-test-claims/news-story/740eb33c75fa26314113fd81c5afa0ca" target="_blank">Jared Owens, 'Andrew Leigh criticises Rod Sims over ‘effects test’ claims' (The Australian, 25 July 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC enjoys partial success in cable cartel case</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:06:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday Justice Besanco handed down his decision in <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2016prysmian.html">ACCC v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L. (No 12)
  
  [2016] FCA 822 (20 July 2016)</a> in which he found that Prysmian had engaged in price fixing conduct in relation to the supply of land cables in Australia. However, his Honour dismissed the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, finding that the ACCC had not established that Nexans SA had made an arrangement or arrived at an understanding in relation to the relevant project. The Federal Court had previously made orders against Viscas Corporation, who admitted their involvement in the relevant conduct. </p>
<p>See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-finds-cable-manufacturer-engaged-in-cartel-conduct" title="ACCC Prysmian" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also useful summary from HSM: <a href="http://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/insights/legal-briefings/mixed-result-for-accc-in-high-voltage-cable-cartel-case#.V5XpjOidIPE.twitter" target="_blank">Peter Strickland and Tessa Spense, 'Mixed result for ACCC in high voltage cable cartel case' (Herbert Smith Freehills, 25 July 2016)</a>.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2016prysmian.html" title="Prysmian case page">my case page</a> for further details and for links to the judgments.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government committed to effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:05:56 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the <a href="reports/2016agriculture.html">Productivity Commission's draft report on the regulation of agriculture</a>, released, Thursday, Treasurer Scott Morrison has reinforced the Government's commitment to implementing the 'effects test' for misuse of market power, as recommended in the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-mmp.html">Harper Report</a>. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/morrison-back-nationals-over-productivity-commission-on-farm-red-tape-20160721-gqahcb" target="_blank">Fluer Anderson, 'Morrison back Nationals over Productivity Commission on farm red tape' (AFR, 21 July 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merger approval day (Asciano approved; Metcash undertaking accepted)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:48:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the acquisition of Asciano by Qube, Brookfield and others. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197152/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">Asciano merger register page</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-acquisition-of-asciano-by-qube-brookfield-and-others" target="_blank">ACCC's media release on Asciano</a>.</p>
     <p>The ACCC also announced this morning that it would not oppose Metcash's bid to acquire Home Timber &amp; Hardware after accepting enforceable undertakings from Metcash's. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-accepts-metcash-undertaking-paving-way-for-home-timber-bid" target="_blank">ACCC media release on Metcash</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1197122/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">Metcash/HTH merger register page</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/q-a-metcash%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-home-timber-hardware" target="_blank">ACCC's Q&amp;A page on Metcash/HTH</a>.</p>
     <p>For commentary on the Asciano deal see, for example, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/infrastructure/accc-approves-asciano-takeover-20160720-gqa9mi" target="_blank">James Thomson, 'ACCC approves Asciano takeover' (AFR, 21 July 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-green-lights-qube-and-brookfields-takeover-of-asciano/news-story/8612c7d65ca0ce08ff59213d7f4309e6" target="_blank">David Palmer, 'ACCC green lights Qube and Brookfield's takeover of Asciano' (The Australian, 21 July 2016)</a>.</p>
     <p>For commentary on the Metcash approval see, for example, <a href="http://www.afr.com/street-talk/metcash-secures-accc-approval-for-home-timber-and-hardware-group-hth-20160720-gqaart" target="_blank">Sarah Thompson, Anthony Macdonald and Joyce Moulakis, 'Metcash secures ACCC approval for Home Timber and Hardware Group' (AFR, 21 July 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-clears-path-for-metcashs-hardware-extension/news-story/63d7a66969b00a4844760d398277ac6c" target="_blank">David Palmer, 'ACCC clears path for Metcash's hardware extension' (The Australian, 21 July 2016)</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PC draft report on the regulation of agriculture released</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Productivity Commission today released its regulation of agriculture draft report. Comments on the report are due by 18 August. Chapter 11 deals with competition regulation. Briefly, the draft report concludes that: </p>
     <blockquote>
       <p>'Competition is a key driver of innovation, productivity and competitiveness in agriculture.
         However, there are longstanding concerns about small farm businesses being subject to
         anticompetitive behaviour from dominant market players in the supply chain....' (p 28)</p>
       <p>'The existing competition regulation and oversight is adequate for managing concerns about
         abuse of market power by supermarkets and traders engaging with farm businesses. The
         current focus on the potential for the misuse of market power by wholesale merchants and
         supermarkets engaging with farmers is not well supported by evidence.' (p 29)</p>
       <p>'Suggestions to amend section 45 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cwlth) are
         unlikely to increase the adoption of collective bargaining because they do not address
         significant economic disincentives and a cultural aversion in the agricultural sector to
         participating in cooperatives. Introducing an ‘effects’ test to section 46 of the Act is also
         unlikely to shield farm businesses from intense competition in retail food markets.' (p 29)</p>
     </blockquote>
     <p>Notwithstanding these draft conclusions, Nationals Senator Fiona Nash has reinforced the Nationals' commitment to the introduction of (amongst other things) an effects test: see <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/the-bold-new-face-of-the/7647562" target="_blank">'The bold new face of the National Party', RN Breakfast, 21 July 2016</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/fiona-nash-rejects-productivity-commission-on-foreign-investment-regulations/news-story/d0a129b2470a80c2ab2794731df77bce" target="_blank">Jared Owens, 'Fiona Nash rejects Productivity Commission on foreign investment, regulations' (The Australian, 21 July 2016)</a>.</p>
     <p>See <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/agriculture/draft" target="_blank">report page</a>. See also, <a href="https://theconversation.com/productivity-commission-attacks-competition-effects-test-and-farm-foreign-investment-rules-62797" target="_blank">Michelle Grattan, 'Productivity Commission attacks competition ‘effects test’ and farm foreign investment rules' (The Conversation, 21 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/productivity-commission-takes-aim-at-rural-protectionism-20160720-gq9jhx" target="_blank">Phillip Coorey, 'Productivity Commission takes aim at rural protectionism' (AFR, 20 July 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/policy/productivity-commission-joins-fight-against-effects-test-20160720-gqa14w" target="_blank">Jacob Greber, 'Productivity Commission joins fight against 'effects test'' (AFR, 21 July 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/productivity-commission-takes-aim-at-rural-protectionism-20160720-gq9jhx" target="_blank">David Uren, 'No logic to red tape hobbling farms: Productivity Commission' (The Australian, 21 July 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NYK Pleads Guilty to criminal cartel conduct</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:01:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha today pleaded guilty to criminal cartel conduct in the Federal Court. This represents the first criminal cartel case in Australia since criminal penalties were introduced in 2009. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australia%E2%80%99s-first-criminal-cartel-charge-laid-against-nyk" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See my <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/current/2016-nsd1143-nyk.html">NYK case page</a>.   See also <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/hottopics/criminalcartel.html">hot topic - criminal cartel</a> page.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First criminal cartel case launched</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2016 10:10:48 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>It appears we  have our first criminal cartel case, with <em>The Queen v Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha</em> listed for a directions hearing before Justice Wigney at 10:15am on Monday. An indictment was filed by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions on Thursday, but further details are not yet known. <em>The Australian </em>reports that the ACCC is 'due to make public statements on the matter on Monday'. See further <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-launches-criminal-cartel-case-against-japanese-shipper-nyk/news-story/5adf9dafb4fd0f3f5d422d7192dd1dce" target="_blank">John Durie and Ben Butler, 'ACCC launches criminal cartel case against Japanese shipper NYK' (The Australian, 15 July 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/accc-bares-teeth-with-criminal-case-against-japans-nyk/news-story/36c798b56c9c13fee712119d7ce5f2f4" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC bares teeth with criminal case against Japan's NYK' (The Australian, 16 July 2016)</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Testing the mettle of the ACCC's Rod Sims'</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:53:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Anne Hyland has an article in the AFR's Boss magazine today about the role and challenges of the ACCC. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/brand/boss/the-mettle-of-the-acccs-rod-sims-20160620-gpngmd" target="_blank">Anne Hyland, 'Testing the mettle of the ACCC's Rod Sims' (Australian Financial Review, <em>Boss</em>, 8 July 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues new collective bargaining guidance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:52:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today released a brief new guide for small business and farmers on the benefits of collective bargaining. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/how-collective-bargaining-can-benefit-farmers-and-small-businesses" target="_blank">ACCC, 'How collective bargaining can benefit farmers and small business' (Media Release, 8 July 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/the-benefits-of-working-with-other-small-businesses-collective-bargaining-and-collective-boycotts" target="_blank">ACCC, 'The benefits of working with other small businesses: collective bargaining and collective boycotts' (ACCC Guide, 8 July 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC flags competition concerns with Borg's proposed acquisition of Alpine's MDF manufacturing assets</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:52:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER16+6377.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1196749&amp;trimFileName=MER16+6377.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> detailing 'strong concerns' raised by Alpine and Borg customers about the proposed transaction. Submissions on the SoI are due by 21 July and a final decision is expected by 1 September. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/competition-concerns-with-proposed-acquisition-by-borg-of-alpine%E2%80%99s-mdf-manufacturing-assets" title="ACCC media release Borg" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195544/fromItemId/750991" title="Borg merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC consultation on Metcash's proposed Home Timber Undertaking</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:27:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is inviting comments on Metcash's <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER16+6280.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1196716&amp;trimFileName=MER16+6280.pdf" target="_blank">draft undertaking</a> in relation to its proposed acquisition of Home Timber and Hardware. Submissions are due by 12 July. A decision is expected 21 July. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-consults-on-proposed-home-timber-undertaking-from-mitre-10" title="ACCC media release Undertaking" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195715/fromItemId/750991" title="Merger register Mitre 10" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sea Swift determination</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:47:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Tribunal has now released its <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/documents/act2016/ACT-2-of-2016-determination.pdf" target="_blank">determination</a> in the Sea Swift matter along with a <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/documents/act2016/ACT-2-of-2016-determination-bg.pdf" target="_blank">background to determination</a> document. The <em>Statement of Reasons </em>is not yet available. For full details see <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations" target="_blank">Australian Competition Tribunal authorisation page</a>. </p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/treasury-wine-estates-glass-half-full-despite-election-chaos/news-story/350c52bf5ad63c5fd2a7d52558bece36" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Treasury Wine Estates: glass half full despite election chaos' (The Australian, 5 July 2016) (under heading 'Watchdog's bad record', mid-way down the page)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opens inquiry into ADSL regulation</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:50:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has commenced a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/fixed-line-services/wholesale-adsl-service-declaration-inquiry-2016" target="_blank">public inquiry</a> 'into whether the wholesale asymmetrical digital subscriber line (ADSL) service should continue to be regulated.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/fixed-line-services/wholesale-adsl-service-declaration-inquiry-2016/discussion-paper" target="_blank">discussion paper</a>. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-commences-inquiry-into-regulation-of-wholesale-adsl-service" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sea Swift authorisation</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:47:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Gilbert + Tobin have issued a Client Update on the Tribunal's Sea Swift decision. Gilbert+Tobin acted for Sea Swift in the matter. The Tribunal's reasons are not yet available. See <a href="https://www.gtlaw.com.au/?q=client-update-australian-competition-tribunal-authorises-sea-swift’s-acquisition-toll’s-marine" target="_blank">Gilbert+Tobin, 'Australian Competition Tribunal authorises Sea Swift's acquisition of Toll's marine freight assets' (July 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations" target="_blank">Australian Competition Tribunal authorisation page</a> for submissions and related resources. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sea Swift acquisition authorised</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 Jul 2016 15:47:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian Competition Tribunal has authorised Sea Swift's proposed acquisition of the NT and Far North Qld marine freight assets of Toll Marine Logistics Australia. This is: </p>
     <blockquote>
       <p>'subject to conditions imposing a cap on future prices and requiring Sea Swift to continue to operate scheduled services to remote communities for up to 5 years, and providing for access by other marine freight firms to the roll-on roll-off ramp at Gove (Nhulunbuy)' (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/sea-swift’s-acquisition-of-toll-marine’s-nt-and-fnq-marine-freight-assets-authorised-by-the-australian-competition-tribunal" title="Sea Swift ACCC" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>)</p>
     </blockquote>
     <p>The proposed acquisition was <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/q-and-a-sea-swift-proposed-acquisition-of-toll-marine" target="_blank">previously opposed by the ACCC</a> and the ACCC has expressed disappointment in the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal's reasons are yet to be released. </p>
     <p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/sea-swift’s-acquisition-of-toll-marine’s-nt-and-fnq-marine-freight-assets-authorised-by-the-australian-competition-tribunal" title="Sea Swift ACCC" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations" target="_blank">Australian Competition Tribunal authorisation page</a>. </p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-loses-toll-freight-merger-decision/news-story/0d31d1f35d253fee3eaf22146ed8ebc5" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC loses Toll freight merger decision' (The Australian, 1 July 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash news</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:47:06 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>More media today on the ACCC's deferral of its decision on Metcash's proposed purchase of Home Timber &amp; Hardware. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/retail/metcash-opening-bid-fails-to-win-over-accc-20160630-gpve18.html" target="_blank">Catie Low, 'Metcash bid fails to win over ACCC' (The Age, 1 July 2016, page 20)</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195715/fromItemId/750991" title="Metcash merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC defers Metcash decision</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:46:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has deferred its decision on Metcash's proposed purchase of Home Timber &amp; Hardware after Metcash submitted an undertaking for consideration. The <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195715/fromItemId/750991" title="Metcash merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a> states: </p>
     <blockquote>
       <p>&quot;Former proposed decision date of 30 June 2016 delayed to allow the ACCC to consider an undertaking submitted by Metcash and whether the undertaking is suitable to proceed to consultation. The ACCC will announce a new decision date in due course ...&quot; </p>
     </blockquote>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-defers-decision-on-metcashs-purchase-of-home-timber--hardware/news-story/f199acf22977cb781f038692e2cd5ced" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC defers decision on Metcash’s purchase of Home Timber &amp; Hardware' (The Australian, 30 June 2016)</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Latest Competition and Consumer Law Journal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:46:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The latest <a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com.au/en-AU/products/Competition-and-Consumer-Law-Journal.page" target="_blank">Competition &amp; Consumer Law Journal </a>features an article by Rob Nicholls and Jenny Buchan on local market analysis in merger clearance (Rob Nicholls and Jenny Buchan, 'Failing firm, failing franchisor: Local market analysis in Australian merger clearances' (2016) 23(3) <em>Competition and Consumer Law Journal </em>247). The issue also features a number of articles on Australian consumer law.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel fines</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:46:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In today's Australian Leo Shanahan discusses a nifty comparison of Australian and global cartel fines for 2016 (sourced from <a href="http://www.aoinvestigationsinsight.com/now-published-allen-overys-global-cartel-enforcement-mid-year-report-2016/" target="_blank">Allen &amp; Overy</a>), noting a significant increase in cartel fines in Australia (currently $45.7m for 2016). See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/cartel-fines-up-457m-as-accc-bares-teeth/news-story/ac618f47df4d3020f55422d56dc82439" target="_blank">Leo Shanahan, 'Cartel fines up $45.7m as ACCC bares teeth' (The Australian, 24 June 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/18837-accc-cracking-down-on-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">Lara Bullock, 'ACCC cracking down on cartel conduct' (Lawyers Weekly, 24 June 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.allenovery.com/publications/en-gb/globalcartelenforcement/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank">Allen &amp; Overy, Global Cartel Enforcement 2016 (including video brief from John Terzaken)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allege cartel in polycarbonate roofing industry</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:45:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has 'instituted proceedings in the Federal Court against four companies and three individuals for alleged cartel conduct in relation to the supply of polycarbonate roof sheeting (‘polycarb’) to retailers in Australia.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-alleged-cartel-conduct-in-the-polycarbonate-roofing-industry" title="Cartel media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Car sales market study</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:45:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has launched a market study into the new car retailing industry, focusing on competition and consumer issues. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-launches-market-study-into-new-car-retailing-industry" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC launches market study into new car retailing industry' (MR 107/16, 17 June 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/accc-to-put-new-car-sales-under-the-microscope/news-story/b4900a39425dc3cbdce682bb6cc3637f" target="_blank">Daniel Palmer, 'ACCC to put new car sales under the microscope' (The Australian, 17 June 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation news</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:45:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has authorised collective bargaining by Victorian chicken growers when dealing with processors (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-collective-bargaining-by-victorian-chicken-growers" target="_blank">ACCC chicken growers media release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195113/fromItemId/278039" title="Chicken growers authorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>) and is proposing to authorise 'Melbourne City Council and 13 other parties to establish a joint renewable energy purchasing group', the Melbourne Renewable Energy Project (see <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D16+77863.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1196424&amp;trimFileName=D16+77863.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a>, <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1194790/fromItemId/278039" title="Renewable energy authorisation register" target="_blank">authorisation register</a> <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-renewable-energy-joint-purchasing-group" title="Renewable energy media release" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>). </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts divestiture undertakings from Primary Health Care Ltd and Healthscope Ltd</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:45:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has accepted s 87B undertakings from primary Healthcare and Healthscope. </p>
     <p>The undertakings arose from the ACCC's investigation of Primary's acquisition of Healthscope's pathology assets in Qld in 2015, which occurred without the parties notifing the ACCC. </p>
     <p>View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-acts-to-restore-competition-for-pathology-services-in-queensland" title="MR Primary Health Care" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1196388/fromItemId/751046" title="Merger register Primary Health Care" target="_blank">merger register</a> (including the s 87B undertakings from both Healthscope and Primary Healthcare).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Labor promises increase in penalties and market studies power for the ACCC</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:44:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Andrew Leigh MP announced today that Labor would:</p>
     <ul>
       <li>increase civil penalties under the Australian Consumer Law from $1.1m to $10m;<br />
       </li>
       <li>adopt the EU's penalty system for anti-competitive conduct ('based on 30 per cent of the annual sales of the relevant product or service, multiplied by the number of years the infringement took place, limited to the greater of 10 per cent of annual turnover, or $10 million')</li>
       <li>use some revenue from increased penalties to increase the ACCC's litigation budget <br />
       </li>
       <li>amend the CCA to give the ACCC a market studies function 'so that it can explore public interest issues such as pricing discrepancies and increased market competition')</li>
     </ul>
     <p>View <a data-mce-href="http://www.andrewleigh.com/scammers_face_10million" href="http://www.andrewleigh.com/scammers_face_10million">Media Release</a>. See also '<a href="http://www.100positivepolicies.org.au/reforming_competition_policy_for_fairer_markets_fact_sheet" target="_blank">Reforming Competition Policy for Fairer Markets Fact Sheet</a>' and <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/election-2016-labor-to-beefup-accc-20160615-gpjcd5" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'Election 2016: Labor to beef-up ACCC' (AFR, 15 June 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Laundry detergent hearing commences</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:42:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC's  case against Cussons has commenced in the Federal Court. The ACCC has alleged Woolworths conspired with Colgate, Unilever and Cussons in relation to the introduction of a new detergent product in contravention of s 45 of the (then) <em>Trade Practices Act</em> (the conduct alleged to have contravened the Act took place prior to the introduction of the current cartel laws). The ACCC is seeking pecuniary penalties, declarations, injunctions, compliance programs and costs.</p>
<p>All other parties have admitted involvement: Woolworths admitted its involvement recently and was fined $9m earlier this month (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/woolworths-ordered-to-pay-9-million-in-penalties-in-laundry-detergent-cartel-proceedings" title="Woolworths media release" target="_blank">ACCC media release re Woolworths</a>). Earlier Colgate made admissions and, on 28 April 2016, was ordered to pay penalties totalling $18m plus a contribution toward the ACCC's costs (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/colgate-ordered-to-pay-18-million-penalty-in-laundry-detergent-cartel-proceedings" target="_blank">media release re: Colgate</a> and <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2016/2016fca0528" target="_blank">reasons for judgment</a>). Unilever was the first to admit its involvement and was granted immunity.</p>
<p>See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/woolworthsled-cartel-meant-less-consumer-choice-court-hears-20160607-gpd8g9" target="_blank">Misa Han, 'Woolworths-led cartel meant less consumer choice, court hears' (AFR, 8 June 2016)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC appeals penalty in Cement Australia</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:20:44 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has appealed against the $17.1m penalty <a href="cases/2013cement.html">against Cement Australia</a> ordered by the Federal Court on 29 April (originally penalties totallying $18.6 were ordered, but $1.5m of those penalties has been set aside).  The ACCC had sought penalties of in excess of $90m. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-cement-australia-level-of-penalties" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. </p>
     <p>The penalty judgment is not currently available for viewing online: see <a href="https://jade.io/article/477689" target="_blank">ACCC v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 536</a> para 14 ('The Court orders that market sensitive data contained in the reasons for judgment published by the Court to the parties only on 29 April 2016 bearing the Medium Neutral Citation Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 453 be removed from the reasons for judgment until further order.')</p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-appeals-cement-australia-ruling/news-story/020d806a46b8febfb9f3b6661911f5fb" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC appeals Cement Australia ruling' (The Australian, 6 June 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Woolworths admits accessorial role in laundry detergent cartel; ordered to pay $9m in penalties</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:23:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court has ordered Woolworths to pay penalties totalling $9m following admissions that it was 'knowingly concerned in the making of, and giving effect to, an understanding between Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd (Colgate), PZ Cussons Australia Pty Ltd (Cussons) and Unilever Australia Limited (Unilever) that they would each cease supplying standard concentrate laundry detergents to Woolworths in early 2009 and supply only ultra concentrates to Woolworths from that time.' The penalty was based on joint submissions as to penalty.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/woolworths-ordered-to-pay-9-million-in-penalties-in-laundry-detergent-cartel-proceedings" title="Woolworths media release" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/woolworths-expected-to-admit-cartel-behaviour/news-story/fb35d95f73ed451e5c1984efd61b9400" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Woolworths admits cartel behaviour' (The Australian, 3 June 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose Metal Manufacturers' proposed acquisition of Cetnaj</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:23:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Cetnaj Pty Ltd by Metal Manufacturers Limited (MML).' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-metal-manufacturers%E2%80%99-proposed-acquisition-of-cetnaj" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal rules on Port of Newcastle access</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:44:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Glencore has succeeded in its application to the Australian Competition Tribunal to have the decision of the (then acting Treasurer), Mathias Cormann, not to declare the Port of Newcastle, set aside. The Tribunal yesterday announced it would set aside Mr Cormann's decision and declare the port. <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2016/2016acompt0006" target="_blank">View judgment (Application by Glencore Coal Pty Ltd [2016] ACompT 6)</a>. </p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/current-matters/tribunal-documents/act-1-2016" target="_blank">Tribunal documents relating to Glencore's application</a> and <a href="http://ncc.gov.au/application/application-for-declaration-of-shipping-channel-services-at-the-port-of-new" target="_blank">original NCC application </a>and the <a href="http://ncc.gov.au/application/application-for-declaration-of-shipping-channel-services-at-the-port-of-new/5" target="_blank">NCC's Final Recommendation (2 Nov 2015) and Minister's decision and statement of reasons (8 January 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC publishes NBN Co's proposed variation to SAU</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 08:43:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has 'published NBN Co’s proposed variation to its Special Access Undertaking (SAU) and is inviting feedback from interested parties on the proposed variation.'  Submissions are due by 26 August 2016.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-publishes-nbn-co%E2%80%99s-proposed-variation-to-its-special-access-undertaking-for-consultation" title="MR NBN" target="_blank">media release</a>.  See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/national-broadband-network-nbn/nbn-co-sau-variation" target="_blank">SAU variation and related documents</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining by chicken growers</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 08:43:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has 'issued a final decision allowing members of the WA Broiler Growers Association to collectively bargain with the chicken processor they supply. Authorisation is granted for ten years.' See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-collective-bargaining-by-chicken-growers-in-western-australia" title="Chicken MR" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1194203/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to commence excessive surcharge compliance role</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:43:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC will 'begin enforcing the ban on excessive surcharges for large merchants on 1 September 2016'. Surcharges are excessive when the exceed the permitted cost of acceptance, which is defined in the Reserve Bank of Australia's Payments System Board Standard. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-commence-excessive-surcharge-compliance-role-on-1-september-2016" title="Surcharge MR" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statement of Issues released for proposed acquisition of Asciano</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 09:53:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>As expected, the ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER16+4745.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1196035&amp;trimFileName=MER16+4745.pdf" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of Asciano by Qube, Brookfield and others. The ACCC has noted the following concerns (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-the-proposed-acquisition-of-asciano-by-qube-brookfield-and-others" target="_blank">media release</a>):</p>
     <ul>
       <li>the post merger level of <strong>vertical integration </strong>will be significantly greater than that currently existing</li>
       <li>'that Patrick container terminals may provide preferential access to Qube and ACFS vehicles, and Qube regional export trains running into Port Botany, and<strong> raise rivals&rsquo; costs</strong>' </li>
       <li><strong>possible foreclosure of rival stevedores</strong>. 'Market participants have suggested that if Patrick gives favourable treatment to the container logistics operations of both Qube and ACFS, then Qube and ACFS may provide a superior service offering to importers and exporters on condition that they use shipping lines calling at Patrick container terminals. This may lessen competition in stevedoring.'</li>
     </ul>
     <p>The ACCC also notes that it is 'considering whether stevedoring and empty container park services will be bundled together, in a way that forecloses rival stevedores'.</p>
     <p>The closing date for submissions on the SoI is 10 June with a final decision due to be announced by 21 July. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1194553/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a> for more details.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Latest ABLR</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 14:34:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There's a good (and certainly topical) article by Peter Armitage in this month's Australian Business Law Review - <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2016/2016armitage-slc.html">The evolution of the “substantial lessening of competition” test – a review of case law
       
       
       Peter Armitage
       (2016) 44(2) <em>Australian Business Law Review </em>74</a> (subscription only or <a href="http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/2016/05/16/australian-business-law-review-update-april-2016/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JournalsTalk+%28Journals+Talk%29" target="_blank">purchase individual article here</a>)   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Appointments to the Australian Competition Tribunal</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 14:33:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Earlier this month Treasury announced four new appointments and two reapppointments to the Australian Competition Tribunal. </p>
     <ul>
       <li><strong>New part-time President: Justice Middleton</strong><br />
         The <a href="judges/middleton-john.html">Hon Justice John Middleton</a> will become the new part-time President for five years, following the retirement of <a href="judges/mansfield-john.html">Justice Mansfield</a> in July</li>
       <li><strong>New part-time Deputy Presidents</strong><br />
         The Hon Justices <a href="judges/greenwood-andrew.html">Andrew Greenwood</a>, David Yates and Alan Robertson will serve as part-time Deputy Presidents, each for a period of five years. </li>
       <li><strong>Part-time member re-appointments</strong><br />
         Prof Keven Davis and Dr Darryn Abraham were re-appointed as part-time members (5 years) </li>
     </ul>
     <p>See <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/059-2016/" target="_blank">Treasury media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Law Conference</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 14:33:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Another terrific Competition Law Conference put together by Chris (&amp; Chris) Hodgekiss today. The keynote speech was delivered by current Australian Competition Tribunal President, Justice John Mansfield ('Every time I find the meaning of life, they change it!'), followed by <a href="http://www.jws.com.au/en/lawyers/item/118-john-kench" target="_blank">John Kench's</a> take on 'substantial lessening of competition' and the role of expert economists (later defended Dr Philip Williams in his commentary on the role of expert economists in SLC cases). The third session featured Brent Fisse speaking on '<a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/images/Fisse_-_Facilitating_practices_most_favoured_customer_clauses_220516.pdf" target="_blank">Facilitating Practices, Vertical Restraints and Most Favoured Customers</a>', with the final session dedicated to section 46, with <a href="https://www.gtlaw.com.au/?q=people/luke-woodward" target="_blank">Luke Woodward</a> delivering a paper prepared by himself and Matt Rubinstein on 'The use and misuse of section 46'.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Andrew Leigh on Australia's concentrated markets</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 14:33:25 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Labor's assistant treasurer and shadow competition minister, Andrew Leigh, delivered the John Freebairn Lecture in Public Policy at the University of Melbourne last night, highlighting levels of market concentration in Australia and outlining some of the steps labor would take in relation to competition and consumer policy should it win office. See Mark <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/election-2016--labor-to-toughen-consumer-laws-20160519-goypbv" target="_blank">Ludlow, 'Election 2016 - Labor to toughen consumer laws' (AFR, 19 May 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/election-2016-competition-law-to-target-mergers-that-hurt-the-poor-under-labor-20160519-goz6og.html" target="_blank">Peter Martin, 'Election 2016: Competition law to target mergers that hurt the poor under Labor' (SMH, 19 May 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com.au/heres-how-labor-wants-to-tackle-inequality-and-competition-in-modern-markets-2016-5" target="_blank">Andrew Leigh, 'Here's how Labor wants to tackle inequality and competition in modern markets' (Business Insider, 20 May 2016)</a> containing an edited extract of the lecture. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dahlson on the proposed Mitre 10 and Danks merger</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 14:33:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Dahlson, former Woolworths Chairman, now owner of the hardware chain JC Dahlsen, is supporting the proposed merger between Mitre 10 and Danks, claiming it would strengthen the ability of independents to compete with Bunnings. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/accc-urged-to-approve-anticompetitive-mitre-10-and-danks-merger-20160516-gow1fz.html" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell, 'ACCC urged to approve 'anti-competitive' Mitre 10 and Danks merger' (SMH, 17 May 2016)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on Coles' response to milk prices</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 14:32:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Durie has an item on Coles' response to the drop in farm gate milk prices - see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/coles-seeks-to-avoid-political-fallout-as-milk-deal-turns-sour/news-story/d19b21fc73ca15981ecc9b47917c577b" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Coles seeks to avoid political fallout as milk deal turns sour' (The Australian, 17 May 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC examines milk price cuts</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 14:32:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC is examining the latest milk price cuts from Fonterra and Murray Goulburn to consider whether the changes 'involved misleading conduct or whether there are elements of unconscionable conduct'. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-examining-fonterra-murray-goulburn-milk-price-cuts-20160514-gov8qf.html" target="_blank">Tom Westbrook, 'ACCC examining Fonterra, Murray Goulburn milk price cuts' (SMH, 14 May 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com.au/fonterra-gives-struggling-dairy-farmers-early-cash-as-the-accc-investigates-2016-5" target="_blank">Chris Pash, Fonterra gives struggling dairy farmers early cash as the ACCC investigates' (Business Insider Australia, 16 May 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/murray-goulburn-is-the-real-cause-of-dairy-farmers-pain/news-story/ac805ddcde2a5d5fd8beff1370c7134f" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Murray Goulburn is the real cause of dairy farmers' pain' (The Australian, 16 May 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on delays with Harper implementation</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 14:32:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has a piece in today's Australian noting that it appears the government has abandoned plans to release an exposure draft of Harper-related changes before the election. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/ian-harper-reform-on-competition-in-cold-storage/news-story/a7a19195aaf92b571f62fb248f88ca90" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Ian Harper reform on competition in cold storage' (The Australian, 14 May 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles' petrol pricing under scrutiny ... again ...</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 14:32:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Sue Mitchell reports that the ACCC is watching petrol prices at Coles Express following claims it is subsidising grocery discounts by charging higher petrol prices. It's not clear how this would be problematic under the Act - and ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, noted that it would be 'very unlikely to be a breach of the act', but nevertheless suggested it was a 'concern if it leads to consumers paying more for fuel'. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/coles-petrol-pricing-under-accc-scrutiny-20160512-gotopw.html" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell, 'Coles' petrol pricing under ACCC scrutiny' (SMH, 12 May 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks comment on access guidelines</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2016 16:06:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/part-iiia-access-undertaking-guidelines-1/consultation" target="_blank">draft Part IIIA access undertaking guidelines</a> for public comment. Public submissions are due by Tuesday 7 June 2016. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-seeks-comment-on-draft-guidelines-for-part-iiia-access-undertakings" target="_blank">ACCC notice</a>. View <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/part-iiia-access-undertaking-guidelines-1/" target="_blank">consultation hub</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treasury releases consultation paper on improving consumer outcomes and enhancing competition in relation to credit card interest rates</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2016 18:01:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Treasurer, Scott Morrison MP, has released a consultation paper outlining 'reforms to provide greater legislative protection to vulnerable consumers, to exert more competitive pressure on credit card issuers and to provide consumers with the information they need to make the best choices about how they use their credit cards.'</p>
     <ul>
       <li>View <a href="http://tinyurl.com/creditcardconsult" target="_blank">consultation home page</a></li>
     </ul>
     <p>The consultation paper is the Government's ' response to the Senate Economics References Committee Inquiry into matters relating to credit card interest rates.'</p>
     <ul>
       <li>View <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Credit_Card_Interest" target="_blank">Senate Economics References Committee Inquiry page</a></li>
     </ul>
     <p>Interested parties may make a submission by 17 June 2016.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises refrigerant recovery scheme</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2016 18:01:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has re-authorised 're-authorised Refrigerant Reclaim Australia and participants in the refrigerants industry to continue to co-operate on a scheme to recover refrigerants that threaten the environment.'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-re-authorises-refrigerant-recovery-scheme" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC re-authorises refrigerant recovery scheme' (Media Release)</a>. See also <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190229/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">public register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cattle and Beef Market Studies Forums</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2016 18:01:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has invited people involved with cattle and beef markets to participate in regional forums. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-announces-cattle-and-beef-market-study-forums" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/cattle-and-beef-market-study" target="_blank">Cattle and beef market study</a> home page.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose AB InBev's acquisition of SABMIller</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2016 10:21:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of SABMiller by Anheuser-Busch InBev. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-ab-inbev%E2%80%99s-acquisition-of-sabmiller" title="Media InBev" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195692/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Budget Day</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2016 10:20:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Budget and related speech is available on the <a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/" target="_blank">government's budget site</a>. See, for example:</p>
     <ul>
       <li><a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/2016-17/content/speech/html/index.htm" target="_blank">Budget speech</a></li>
       <li><a href="http://budget.gov.au/2016-17/content/" target="_blank">Budget papers</a></li>
       <li><a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/~/media/Treasury/Publications%20and%20Media/Publications/2016/Portfolio%20Budget%20Statements%202016-17/Downloads/PDF/03_ACCC.ashx" target="_blank">Treasury Portfolio budget statement: ACCC </a>(PDF)</li>
     </ul>
     <p>The budget papers include reference to the Harper Review; under <a href="http://budget.gov.au/2016-17/content/glossies/jobs-growth/html/jobs-growth-01.htm" target="_blank">Jobs and Growth</a> the Government notes it is 'advancing the recommendations of the Harper Competition Policy Review and (in bold print no less) notes that the government is 'strengthening Australian's competition law to prevent big businesses from misusing their market power or seeking to dominate markets.' (see <a href="http://budget.gov.au/2016-17/content/glossies/jobs-growth/downloads/Budget%202016-17_Jobs-Growth.pdf" target="_blank">full PDF segment</a>)</p>
     <p>For media, see for example <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/policy/budget/budget-2016-more-like-preelection-pussy-footing-than-an-economic-plan-20160422-god1u8" target="_blank">Alan Mitchell, 'Budget 2016: More like pre-election pussy footing than an economic plan' (AFR, 3 May 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-03/budget-2016-winners-losers/7338448" target="_blank">Tim Leslie, Paul Donoughue and Simon Elvery, 'Budget 2016: Winner and losers' (ABC, 3 May 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Halliburton terminates proposed deal with Baker Hughes</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2016 20:44:03 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has discontinued its informal review of Halliburton's proposed acquisition of Baker Hughes Inc after Halliburton advised the proposed acquisition would not be proceeding. The ACCC had issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+10934.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1195649&amp;trimFileName=MER15+10934.pdf" target="_blank">statement of issues </a>in relation to the proposed acquisition in October last year. </p>
     <p>See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1195648/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>
     <p>See also <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-02/halliburton-baker-hughes-deal-collapses-amid-global-opposition" target="_blank">Aoife White, 'Halliburton-Baker Hughes Deal Collapses Amid Global Opposition' (Bloombert, 2 May 2016)</a>, <a href="http://news.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/05/02/morning-agenda-halliburton-and-baker-hughes-call-off-merger/?_r=0" target="_blank">Amie Tsang, 'Morning Agenda: Halliburton and Baker Hughes Call Off Merger' (New York Times, 2 May 2016)</a> and <a href="http://explorationanddevelopment.energy-business-review.com/news/oilfield-services-provider-halliburton-terminates-28bn-merger-with-baker-hughes-020516-4880306" target="_blank">'Oilfiled services provider Halliburton terminates $28b merger with Baker Hughes' (EBR, 2 May 2016)</a>   </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Budget eve</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2016 20:43:52 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On budget-eve 2016 Peter Martin reports on how the budgets of ACCC and other regulates have fared under the current government - he notes that the ACCC has lost 10% of staff over the past three years.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/federal-budget/asic-accc-and-tax-office-budgets-slashed-in-coaltions-first-three-years-20160430-goj50q.html" target="_blank">Peter Martin, 'ASIC, ACCC and Tax Office budgets slashed in Coalition's first three years' (SMH, 1 May 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on Cement Australia</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 20:43:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>There has been some limited media following the <a href="#cementaustralia">Federal Court's order</a> of penalties totaling $18.6m against Cement Australia (and related companies) yesterday for contraventions of s 45 of the (then) Trade Practices Act. </p>
<p>Most notable is <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/politics-triumphs-over-principles-in-kidman-decision/news-story/d47f0f1179f6745cb4033f84bc4ee20b" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Politics triumphs over principles in Kidman decision' (The Australian, 30 April 2016) </a>(various issues discussed - scroll down), who labels the fine imposed by Justice Greenwood a 'slap on the wrist' (particularly in light of the fact that the ACCC had sought $97m in penalties) and who considers (with some justification) the delay in handing down the decision a 'disgrace'. He further noted that the reasons for decision (still unavailable until confidentiality issues are resolved) run to 250 pages (admittedly less than the 940 odd pages of the primary judgment). See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/accc-delivers-40m-in-penalties-in-three-days-20160429-goibaj" target="_blank">Mark Ludlow, 'ACCC delivers $40m in penalties in three days' (AFR, 29 April 2016).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$18.6m penalties ordered against Cement Australia companies for competition law contravention</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:45:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court has ordered penalties totalling $18.6m against Cement Australia and related companies for contravening s 45 of the (then) Trade Practices Act. So far the judgment has been made available to the parties on a 'restricted basis pending resolution of confidentiality issues'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/186-million-penalties-ordered-against-cement-australia-companies-for-anti-competitive-flyash-agreements" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Egg news</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:45:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><span class="styleboxnews"><img src="images/paperboy_newspaper.png" alt="Christmas tree" width="250" height="321" class="alignright"/></span>The Federal Court (Justice White) has declared that in 2012 Zelko Lendich 'attempted to encourage certain egg producers in Australia to enter into an arrangement or arrive at an understanding containing a provision to limit the production for supply and the supply of eggs in Australia' and that the agreement or understanding, if entered into, 'would have had the purpose of directly or indirectly preventing, restricting or limiting the production for supply and the supply, or the likely production for supply and the likely supply, of eggs by any or all of the egg producers' in contravention of s 44ZZRJ of the Act. See judgment: <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2016/447.html" target="_blank">ACCC v Australian Egg Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 447 (29 April 2016)</a> </p>
           <p>Mr Lendich was ordered to pay $120,000 in respect of the declaration, as well as engage in a training session about the cartel laws.  He was also ordered to pay ACCC costs in the amount of $10,000 as well as a contribution to costs of the other respondents. These orders follow admissions made by Mr Lendich.</p>
           <p>This decision follows <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2016/2016fca0069" title="First egg case" target="_blank">dismissal of the ACCC's proceedings</a> against the other respondents to the proceeding, including the Australian Egg Corporation Ltd, on 10 February, against which the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-aecl-decision" target="_blank">ACCC has appealed</a>.           </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Productivity Commission's Draft IP report released</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:14:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/intellectual-property/draft" target="_blank">Draft Productivity Commission Report on Intellectual Property Arrangements</a>, released today, is consistent with the recommendations made by the <a href="reports/2015harper-report.html">Harper Panel</a> in relation to IP. In particular, it recommends removal of parallel import restrictions on books by no later than the end of 2017 (draft rec's 5.2). It further recommends that the Government make clear that it is not an infringement of the Copyright Act for consumers to circumvent geoblocking technology (draft recommendation 5.1)<br />
             <br />
             The Draft Report also acknowledges that a 'well-functioning IP system must take account of the longer run effects on competition
that exclusivity of ideas can create' (p 386). It considers current competition law exemptions relating to licensing or assignment of IP property and exemptions form the National Access Regime. In relation to the former it recommends repeal of the s 51(3) exemption and that the ACCC issue guidance on the application of the competition law provisions of the CCA to intellectual property (draft rec 14.1). In relation to access, the PC does not reach a concluded view, but requests further information (p 399). </p>
           <p>The Draft Report also considers pharmaceutical pay for delay schemes (ch 9). It recommends, in part, that the Government should 'introduce a transparent reporting and monitoring
system to detect any pay-for-delay settlements between originator and generic
pharmaceutical companies' and that this should be administered by the ACCC (draft rec 9.4).</p>
           <p>There is plenty more in the report of interest. Submissions on the draft report can be made until 3 June. A final report is expected in August. View <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/intellectual-property#draft" target="_blank">Public Inquiry home page</a>.</p>
           <p>See, for example, <a href="https://theconversation.com/productivity-commissions-recommendations-on-ip-reform-likely-to-be-lost-in-election-haze-58576" target="_blank">Bruce Baer Arnold, 'Productivity Commission’s recommendations on IP reform likely to be lost in election haze' (The Conversation, 29 April 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty judgment in Cement Australia scheduled for today at 4:15pm (Brisbane)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:47:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013cement.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> Justice Greenwood is expected to hand down his formal orders in <em>ACCC v Cement Australia Pty Ltd </em>today (4:15pm). This follows the hearing on these matters in December 2014, which followed publication of the judgment (accompanied by interim declarations) in the principal proceedings (<a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/909.html" target="_blank">ACCC v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 909</a>) on 10 September 2013 (running to 940 pages!). <br />
  <br />
  In that judgment, Cement Australia (and other respondents) were found to have contravened section 45 (the ACCC's claim that they had also contravened s 46 did not succeed). The interim declarations were discharged and dissolved in February 2014 (<a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/148.html" target="_blank">Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 148</a>); in that judgment Justice Greenwood dismissed proceedings insofar as they related to a claimed contravention of s 46 and made various orders declaring contravention of s 45. Costs and final orders, including those relating to pecuniary penalty, were reserved for later determination. The hearing on these matters took place in December 2014. Following the judgment, expected to day, the parties will have 21 days to file an appeal.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Court orders Colgate to pay $18m penalties as a result of ACCC cartel proceedings</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:19:05 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> Following admissions by Colgate that it entered into understandings which limited the supply - and controlled the price - of laundry detergents, the Federal Court has ordered Colgate pay penalties totaling $18m for contraventions of the <em>TPA </em>(as it was when the contraventions took place). Proceedings are continuing against Cussons and Woolworths, which the ACCC also alleges gave effect to cartel and other anti-competitive arrangements. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/colgate-ordered-to-pay-18-million-penalty-in-laundry-detergent-cartel-proceedings" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on proposed new-car import changes</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:33:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has an opinion piece in today's <em>The Australian</em>, discussing proposed new-car importation changes <a href="http://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/pf/releases/2016/February/pf017_2016.aspx" target="_blank">recently announced by the Government</a>. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/rod-sims-newcar-importation-changes-can-increase-competition/news-story/d374a22453f3f51a13dc475901b6b553" target="_blank">Rod Sims, 'Rod Sims: new-car importation changes can increase competition' (The Australian, 28 April 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Membership of new Agriculture Consultative Committee announced</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:31:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p> The ACCC has announced the membership of its new Agriculture Consultative Committee, which will provide a 'forum for the discussion of competition and fair trading concerns related to the agriculture sector'. The Committee will be Chaired by the ACCC's agricultural Commissioner, Mick Keogh. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-announces-membership-of-new-agriculture-consultative-committee" title="Media release agriculture committee" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/consultative-committees/agriculture-consultative-committee" target="_blank">Committee details</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC sets new proposed date for ruling on beer merger</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:23:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC last week delayed its decision (originally due 21 April) about the proposed acquisition by Ahnheuser-Busch InBev of SABMIller, at the request of the brewers. I received further information from the parties today and has set a revised proposed date for announcement of its decision - next Thursday, 5 May 2016. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1191932/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-again-delays-ruling-on-beer-megamerger-of-anheuserbusch-inbev-sabmiller-20160419-goagm1.html" target="_blank">Simon Evans, 'ACCC again delays ruling on beer mega-merger of Anheuser-Busch InBev, SABMiller' (SMH, 20 April 2012)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases East Coast Gas Inquiry Report</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:22:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC released its report on the 'competitiveness of wholesale gas prices in eastern and southern Australia' last week. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/release-of-east-coast-gas-inquiry-report-into-the-increasingly-complex-and-uncertain-gas-market" title="ACCC Media Release Gas" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/energy/east-coast-gas-inquiry-2015" target="_blank">project page</a> (including <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/1074_Gas%20enquiry%20report_FA_21April.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/East%20Coast%20Gas%20Inquiry%20key%20findings_0.pdf" target="_blank">key findings</a>). This was followed by plenty of media - see, for example, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-22/gas-supplier-monopoly-pricing-hits-domestic-users/7350338" target="_blank">Stephen Letts, 'Gas supplier monopoly pricing hits domestic users hard: ACCC' (ABC News, 22 April 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/stephen-bartholomeusz/pipelines-under-pressure-as-accc-inquiry-misses-the-mark-on-gas/news-story/fa31e4481739334225111cc919036c2d" target="_blank">Stephen Bartholemeusz, 'Pipelines under pressure as ACCC inquiry misses the mark on gas' (The Australian, 22 April 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columns/big-mick-fumes-as-gas-regulation-looms-20160422-gocz5b" target="_blank">Matthew Stevens, 'Big Mick fumes as gas regulation looms' (AFR, 22 April 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOI released on proposed acquisition of Jennmar Australia by DSI</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:30:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p> The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER16+3459.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1195293&amp;trimFileName=MER16+3459.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of Jenmar Australia by DYWIDAG-Systems International Group (DSI), both suppliers of 'ground support products to mining and civil construction customers'. Submissions due by 12 May with proposed announcement on 16 June. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-soi-on-proposed-acquisition-of-jennmar-australia-by-dsi" title="Jennmar SOI media" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1194353/fromItemId/750991" title="Jennmar register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Xenophon's MMP bill restored to Senate Notice Paper</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:30:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The <a href="legislation/2014mmp-bill.html" target="_blank">Competition and Consumer (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2014</a>, which lapsed due to prorogation of parliament, has now been restored to the Senate Notice Paper (<a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A&quot;chamber/hansards/548f7e7e-68e6-4e9c-8f40-5e4a56df0b06/0155&quot;" target="_blank">moved by Senator Xenophon on Tuesday</a>). The private member's bill, introduced by Senator Xenophon in 2014, would give the Court divestiture powers over companies found to have contravened s 46. It is inconsistent with recommendations made in the Harper Report (which considered current remedies sufficient and a divestiture remedy inappropriate) and which have been accepted by the Government. It is, therefore, not expected to pass ... but it is still alive for the moment.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition bills lapse at prorogation</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:00:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> Two competition bills, which were before parliament, have now lapsed by reason of prorogation. The first was the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2014mmp-bill.html" target="_blank">Competition and Consumer (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2014</a>, a private member's bill introduced by Senator Xenophon and which the Senate Economics Legislation Committee recommended against passing back in February 2015. The second was the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2015deregulatory.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Deregulatory and Other Measures) Bill 2015</a>. This bill had been introduced by then Minister for Small Business, the Hon Bruce Billson MP. Although it focused on amendments relating to the Australian Consumer Law, if passed, it would also have introduced amendments to s 5 of the Act  relating to the requirement for private parties to obtain ministerial consent. In particular, it would have removed the requirement for private parties to seek Ministerial consent when bringing an action for a breach that takes place overseas. Unlike the Xenophon bill, the Senate Economics Legislation Committee had recommended that this bill be passed.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telstra's CRM breached competition undertaking</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:00:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC's annual report on Telstra's compliance with its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking-2014-15" target="_blank">SSU</a> during 2014-2015, tabled in Parliament Friday, reveals that, although the ACCC considered that 'Telstra continued to demonstrate a commitment to improving its level of compliance with its' SSU, they nevertheless identified some compliance issues , particularly in relation to safeguarding Protected Information. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking-2014-15" target="_blank">report</a>. See <a href="http://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/anu-seeks-accc-intervention-on-admissions" target="_blank">ANU media release ('ANU seeks ACCC intervention on admissions, 14 April 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04/17/telstras_crm_system_breached_competition_undertaking_accc/" target="_blank">Richard Chirgwin, 'Telstra's CRM system breached competition undertaking: ACCC' (The Register, 17 April 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ANU lodges complaint with the ACCC over conduct of state-based university admission centres</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 20:00:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ANU has lodged a complaint with the ACCC over the decision by three state based tertiary admission centres to reject ANU's application for membership. The ACCC is said to be assessing the complaint. See, eg, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/accc-probes-anus-cartel-complaint-against-tertiary-admissions-centres/news-story/25aae6ba8a43d37c3ff89117ab78eb31" target="_blank">Katherine Towers, 'ACCC probes ANU’s cartel complaint against tertiary admissions centres' (The Australian, 13 April 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/anu-alerts-accc-to-anticompetitive-admissions-centres-20160413-go54mm.html" target="_blank">Emma Macdonald, 'ANU alerts ACCC to anti-competitive admissions centres' (The Canberra Times, 13 April 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC's annual report on Telstra's compliance with Structural Separation Undertaking tabled in Parliament</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 20:00:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC's annual report on Telstra's compliance with its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking-2014-15" target="_blank">SSU</a> during 2014-2015 has been tabled in Parliament. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-reports-on-telstras-compliance-with-its-structural-separation-undertaking" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Qld LNG producers to coordinate maintenance schedules</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 19:59:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC has granted a five year, conditional authorisation to 'Australia Pacific LNG Pty Ltd, Gladstone LNG, and the Queensland Curtis LNG Project to discuss their maintenance schedules, maintenance providers, and maintenance techniques.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-queensland-lng-producers-to-coordinate-their-maintenance-schedules" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190309/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues draft decision on WaterNSW's charges in the Murray-Darling basin</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:49:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC has 'released its draft decision on proposed charges for WaterNSW’s infrastructure services in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) during 2016-17.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-draft-decision-on-waternsws-2016-17-charges-in-the-murray-darling-basin" title="Murray-Darling media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/water/water-projects/waternsw-annual-review-of-regulated-charges-2016-17" target="_blank">draft decision</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC continuing to examine competition implications of NBN/Telstra HFC delivery agreement</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:49:06 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p> The ACCC has 'expressed concerns around the competition implications of Telstra&rsquo;s involvement in the rollout of the NBN network.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-continues-to-examine-competition-implications-of-nbn-telstra-hfc-delivery-agreement" title="Murray-Darling media release" target="_blank">full media release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/accc-tested-by-telstras-latest-nbn-deal/news-story/b72ea1f81259b3ea2df5972e6af5f4e5" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC tested by Telstra’s latest NBN deal' (The Australian, 11 April 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Issues paper released for ACCC cattle and beef market study</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:48:05 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has today released an issues paper for its cattle and beef market study announced Tuesday. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-issues-paper-for-cattle-and-beef-market-study" title="Beef and market study issues paper" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/information-for/agriculture/cattle-and-beef-market-study" target="_blank">issues paper</a>. Submissions are due by <strong>6 May</strong>. See also separate <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016cattle.html">cattle and beef market study page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC launches market study into cattle and beef industry</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:47:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC has announced it will commence a market study into the cattle and beef industry in Australia. This study will 'examine competition, efficiency, transparency and trading issues in the beef and cattle supply chain.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-launches-market-study-into-cattle-and-beef-industry" target="_blank">media release</a>. The issues paper and further information will be available tomorrow from the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/agriculture" target="_blank">ACCC's agriculture page</a>, with draft findings expected in September and a final report expected late November. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/accc-to-probe-cattle-market/news-story/dcdfe26cc6cefd9c80bec887947e0e69" target="_blank">Kylar Loussikian, 'ACCC to probe cattle market' (The Australian, 6 April 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2016/4/5/industries/accc-wanders-fresh-pastures" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC wanders into fresh pastures' (Business Spectator, 5 April 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Loyal Coal Pty Ltd admits competition law breach</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:47:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> Loyal Coal Pty Ltd has agreed to resolve proceedings instituted against it by the ACCC, admitting that in 2009 it entered into and gave effect to an understanding to withdraw from a tender process in contravention of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (as an exclusionary provision). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/loyal-coal-pty-ltd-admits-breaching-competition-law-in-relation-to-mount-penny-coal-exploration-licence-tender-process" target="_blank">media release</a>. Proceedings are continuing against ten other respondents. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/obeidlinked-firm-admits-cartel-deal/news-story/5cc1c8c3bb3ce29cfeaefba971172d70" target="_blank">Anthony Klan, 'Obeid-linked firm admits cartel conduct' (The Australian, 6 April 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/witness-disappears-in-cartel-conduct-case-against-obeids-and-sydney-businessmen-20160403-gnxj1h.html" target="_blank">Michaela Whitbourn, 'Witness disappears in cartel conduct case against Obeids and Sydney businessmen' (SMH, 4 April 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Norton Rose Fulbright on merger control</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:37:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> Norton Rose Fulbright has published a short piece on merger control in Australia and elsewhere, including a three-step guide to managing merger control. See <a href="http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/138499/merger-control-ubiquitous-in-australia-and-abroad" target="_blank">Norton Rose Fulbright, 'Merger control ubiquitous in Australia and abroad' (4 April 2016)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC commences review of Asciano deal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:46:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER16+2711.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1194923&amp;trimFileName=MER16+2711.pdf" target="_blank">market inquiries letter</a> on the $9billion Qube and Brookfield led takeover bid for Asciano, with a provisional date for an announcement on the bid of 26 May 2016. This follows discontinuation of two separate ACCC merger reviews following Asciano's announcement that it had entered into a new binding agreement with the consortium: See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1194553/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC Merger Register</a>. see also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-raises-fresh-questions-over-9-billion-asciano-deal-20160401-gnw54g.html" target="_blank">Jenny Wiggins, 'ACCC raises fresh questions over $9 billion Asciano deal' (SMH, 4 April 2016)</a>.         </p>]]></description>
    </item>
	  
	  <item>
      <title>Sims responds to Durkin's attack on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:52:15 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has spoken on ABC, <em>The Business,</em> responding to questions about the proposed effects test for s 46. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-29/accc-boss-rod-sims-defends-effects-test/7280758" target="_blank">Ticky Fillerton, 'Effects test: ACCC's Rod Sims slams mistruths from big corporates' (ABC News, 29 March 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/rod-sims-criticises-coles-boss-on-effects-test-claims-20160328-gnsb0b" target="_blank">Jacob Greber, 'Rod Sims criticises Coles boss on effects test claims' (AFR, 28 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims outlines agenda for new term</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:52:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p> ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, yesterday nominated by Treasurer Scott Morrison for a further three-year term, has spoken to the AFR about his plans for his next term. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/rod-sims-outlines-tough-agenda-for-new-term-20160323-gnq1r7" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'Rod Sims outlines tough agenda for new term' (AFR, 24 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government nominates Sims for re-appointment as ACCC Chair</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:51:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The Government has nominated Rod Sims for reappointment as Chairman of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission for a period of three years, commencing 1 August 2016. See <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/033-2016/" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High airport profit margins facilitated by lack of competitive pressure</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:59:46 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC's<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/airport-monitoring-reports/airport-monitoring-report-2014-15" target="_blank"> annual Airport Monitoring Report</a> has been released, finding that monitored airports 'continue to enjoy high profit margins in both aeronautical and car parking activities' suggesting 'they do not face much competitive pressure'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/lack-of-competitive-pressure-facilitates-high-profit-margins-at-airports" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conditional authorisation granted for ihail taxi booking app</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:01:51 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC has granted authorisation (with conditions) to a joint venture between taxi networks and others (inc Cabcharge) 'to launch and operate a new smartphone taxi booking app'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-conditional-authorisation-to-ihail-taxi-booking-app" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186905/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wins air cargo appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:59:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> The ACCC has succeeded in its air cargo appeal against the decision in <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2014airnz.html" target="_blank">ACCC v Air New Zealand Limited
             
             
             [2014] FCA 1157 </a>. On the importance of the decision, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated: 'Although it is no longer a requirement of our cartel laws that it be established that price fixing occurred in a market in Australia, this decision is significant because it confirms the ACCC’s view that the conduct by the airlines in fixing air cargo surcharges to be paid by Australian importers and ultimately passed on to Australian consumers, were caught by Australian competition laws'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeal-upheld-in-air-cargo-case" target="_blank">media release</a>. View decision (<a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2016/2016fcafc0042" target="_blank">ACCC v P T Garuda Indonesia Ltd [2016] FCAFC 42</a>). For more details see <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2014airnz.html">case page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media and commentary on government's effects test announcement</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:18:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p> More media and commentary this morning on <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/2016-03-16/joint-media-statement-fixing-competition-policy-drive-economic-growth-and-jobs" target="_blank">yesterday's announcement</a> that the Government would move to adopt the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-mmp.html">Harper recommendation to introduce an effects test for misuse of market power</a>. </p>
           <p>See, for example, <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-government-goes-the-full-harper-on-competition-now-for-sanctions-56277" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells, 'The government goes the full Harper on competition – now for sanctions' (The Conversation, 17 March 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-17/consumer-advocates-hail-effects-test-change-as-a-win/7252900" target="_blank">Amy Bainbridge, '&quot;Effects test&quot; change hailed as a win for consumers' (ABC, 17 March 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/turnbulls-backflip-on-competition-policy-riles-big-business/news-story/64f1aed0b9a16516a9606e244aded893" target="_blank">David Crowe, 'Turnbull's backflip on competition policy riles big business' (The Australian, 17 March 2016)</a>. For more media and commentary see my <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html">Harper media page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government media release on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:41:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The Government has published a media release on its decision to adopt an effects test for s 46 (misuse of market power) of the Competition and Consumer Act. It states: &quot;The Turnbull Government will legislate to fix competition policy in Australia through implementation of the Harper Review’s recommendation to amend Section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act - the misuse of market power provision.&quot; The Government will 'consult on Exposure Draft legislation before introducing it to Parliament later in 2016'. See <a href="http://malcolmturnbull.com.au/media/joint-media-statement-prime-minister-treasurer-and-assistant-treasurer-comp" target="_blank">'Joint Media Statement - Prime Minister, Treasurer and Assistant Treasurer - Competition Policy' (16 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power: current versus proposed tests</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:35:59 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-mmp.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p> In light of today's news that the Government proposes to implement an effects test in line with the Harper recommendations, <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-mmp.html">visit my Harper misuse of market power page</a> to compare the current law with that now proposed.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More media and commentary on government's endorsement of effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:35:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> See, for example, <a href="https://theconversation.com/big-win-for-small-business-in-government-embrace-of-competition-effects-test-56359" target="_blank">Michelle Grattan, 'Big win for small business in government embrace of competition ‘effects test’' (The Conversation, 16 March 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/government-plans-effects-test-to-try-to-curb-misuse-of-market-power/news-story/6b79f5e4148b60928812fa8f9447f9ed" target="_blank">Jared Owens, 'Government plans ‘effects test’ to try to curb misuse of market power' (The Australian, 16 March 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/retail/turnbull-endorses-effects-test/news-story/469e34a763abfafd53d8cfcff33f95de" target="_blank">Frank Chung and AAP, 'Turnbull endorses &quot;effects test&quot;' (news.com.au, 16 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Turnbull Government approves implementation of effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:07:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p> <strong>Breaking news: </strong>The Turnbull government has adopted the Harper panel's recommendation for an effects test for misuse of market power, labelling it 'vital economic reform'.  Mr Turbull said:</p>
           <blockquote>
             <p>&quot;... Last night, the Cabinet has agreed that we will move to amend s.46 in line with the recommendations of the Harper review.&quot;</p>
             <p>&quot;What this will do is ensure that our competition law works better to enable competition, to enable smaller businesses, emerging businesses, to be better able to compete. We know that while larger firms are often very innovative and very often very competitive, they are more innovative if the hot breath of competition is coming down their neck.&quot;</p>
             <p>&quot;It is subtly different from the existing one because it seeks to protect competition. When you protect the competitive process, when you protect competition, you are not protecting one firm or another, you're protecting consumers overall.&quot;</p>
           </blockquote>
           <p>See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/turnbull-government-sides-with-small-business-agrees-to-implement-controversial-effects-test-20160316-gnk6mx.html" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'Turnbull government sides with small business, agrees to implement controversial 'effects test'
             
             (SMH, 16 March 2016)</a>; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/mar/16/competition-law-malcolm-turnbull-abandons-opposition-to-proposed-changes" target="_blank">Lenore Taylor and Gabrielle Chan, 'Competition law: Malcolm Turnbull abandons opposition to proposed changes' (The Guardian, 16 March 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-16/abc-politics-blog/7249940" target="_blank">'Live: Coalition heads into partyroom meeting as battle over 'effects test' draws to close' (ABC, 16 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small business open letter on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:43:22 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> Peter Strong, Chief Executive of the Council of Small Business of Australia, has penned an open letter calling for the implementation of the Harper Panel's recommended changes to s 46. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/managing/an-open-letter-to-the-prime-minister-the-risk-of-not-having-an-effects-test-20160314-gniycu.html" target="_blank">Peter Strong, 'An open letter to the Prime Minister: The risk of not having an effects test' (SMH, 15 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Labor's plans for dealing with anti-competitive behaviour</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:43:03 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> Labor has announced its plan to assist small business to sue big companies for competition law breaches. The plan includes additional funding for the Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman and giving judges the power to waive liability for opposition costs in relation to Part IV CCA proceedings. This, they claim, is a better approach to anti-competitive conduct than the introduction of an effects test: see <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/business-advice/politics/66021-labor-plans-to-make-it-easier-for-small-business-to-sue-big-companies/" target="_blank">Broede Carmody, 'Labor plans to make it easier for small business to sue big companies' (SmartCompany, 15 March 2016)</a>; <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/labor-to-make-it-easier-for-small-business-to-sue-20160313-gni216" target="_blank">Phillip Coorey, 'Labor to make it easier for small business to sue (AFR, 14 March 2016)</a>; <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/business-advice/government-and-politics/66020-michelle-rowland-small-business-needs-practical-solutions-to-confront-anti-competitive-behaviour/" target="_blank">Michelle Rowland, 'Michelle Rowland: Small business needs practical solutions to confront anti-competitive behaviour' (SmartCompany, 15 March 2016)</a>. </p>
<p>The Business Council of Australia has endorsed Labor's policy as superior to the introduction of an effects test: see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/bca-backs-labors-legup-for-small-business/news-story/e8b38c17f4b52a73f0481bb8b10853a7" target="_blank">Joe Kelly, 'BCA backs Labor’s leg-up for small business' (The Australian, 15 March 2016)</a>. Conversely, the National Farmers Federation has argued that Labor's proposal should complement - not replace - the proposed effects test: <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-15/labor-proposes-effects-test-alternative/7248350" target="_blank">Anna Vidot, 'Labor proposal should complement effects test, not replace it: NFF CEO' (ABC Rural, 16 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC granted special leave to appeal in Flight Centre case</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:42:35 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The High Court has granted the ACCC special leave to appeal the Full Federal Court's decision in <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-granted-special-leave-to-appeal-to-the-high-court-from-the-full-federal-court-flight-centre-judgment" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on the ACCC and proposed changes to s 46</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:42:23 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> In his column today, John Durie discusses a number of competition law/policy issues, including proposed changes to section 46, the ACCC's special leave to appeal application in Flight Centre and the ACCC's recent merger decisions. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/john-durie/accc-in-pursuit-of-competition/news-story/ea7a2bca31892df9ad04cb7c1027cb87" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC in pursuit of competition' (The Australian, 11 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on the Coles/Supabarn deal</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:42:10 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> John Durie takes aim at the ACCC for taking 'too long' to announce its decision on the Coles/Supabarn deal, claiming that the 'ACCC needs to take a tougher stance on what is meant to be an informal process': see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/business-spectator/accc-gives-goahead-for-coles-deal-with-supabarn-but-approval-took-too-long/news-story/ce1af598911b933e92ac29a92d29a9fc?sv=c8414d920704eca1d40d83328fc534e0" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC gives go-ahead for Coles deal with Supabarn, but approval took too long' (The Australian, 10 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Coles' proposed acquisition of five Supabarn supermarkets</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:41:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose Coles' proposed acquisition of five Supabarn supermarkets. The original proposal was for Coles to acquire nine Supabarn supermarkets, but Coles restructured their transaction following concerns raised by the ACCC, removing the 'most problematic stores'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-coles-proposed-acquisition-of-five-supabarn-supermarkets" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1194481/" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC rate rigging probe</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:41:38 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> In the wake of ASIC's initiation of civil proceedings against the ANZ, the ACCC has also confirmed it is investigating alleged market manipulation by some Australian banks. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/accc-rate-rigging-probe-well-advanced/news-story/00ce1da1bcc596f631735f6050fa90e8" target="_blank">Richard Gluyas, 'ACCC rate rigging probe well advanced' (The Australian, 7 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to announce decision on Coles/Supabarn deal on Thursday</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:41:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> The ACCC is expected to announce its decision on Coles' proposed acquisition of nine Supabarn supermarkets on Thursday. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-tipped-to-block-sale-of-some-key-supabarn-stores-to-coles/news-story/c44b2e53c5a2e50855d4f97ec5b69f97" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC tipped to block sale of some key Supabarn stores to Coles' (The Australian, 7 March 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/accc-will-say-on-thursday-if-coles-can-buy-nine-supabarn-stores-20160306-gnc62v.html" target="_blank">John Thistleton, 'ACCC will say on Thursday if Coles can buy nine Supabarn stores' (The Canberra Times, 7 March 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187175/" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public competition assessment</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:40:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its Public Competition Assessment on its October 2015 decision not to oppose proposed acquisitions by Foxtel and Ten Network. View <a href="2 March 2016 - Egg appeal" target="_blank">Foxtel/Ten Public Competition Assessment</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Egg appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:40:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today filed a Notice of Appeal from the <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2016/2016fca0069" target="_blank">Federal Court's decision dismissing the ACCC's proceedings</a> against the Australian Egg Corporation Ltd and others, which commenced in May 2014. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-aecl-decision" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/agribusiness/competition-watchdog-accc-appeals-egg-cartel-decision/news-story/5c30e97ddb2b14caf0c6551a90bc9e9b" target="_blank">Alex Sampson, 'Competition watchdog, ACCC, appeals egg cartel decision' (The Weekly Times, 2 March 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The State of Competition kicks off for 2016</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:40:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The latest <em>The State of Competition </em>has hit the virtual shelves. With the spotlight (still) on misuse of market power, the authors have tackled the issue of 'take advantage' and its application via the counterfactual. View <em><a href="https://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_24_Counterfactuals_.pdf" target=_blank>this issue of The State of Competition </a></em>or head over to <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target=_blank>their website</a> for full access to all back-issues (but be warned if you have dogs; after reading this issue I can no longer look at my dogs without picturing them wearing pants!)]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What does 2016 bring for competition law?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:39:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr Martyn Taylor, Andrew Willekes and Louie Liu at Norton Rose Fulbright have published their thoughts on what we might expect for competition regulation in Australia this year. It set out (among many other things) their thoughts on the likelihood of certain Harper Reforms being implemented within the Turnbull Government's next term (if returned to office) (s 46 reforms are considered 'low' on this scale). This is a must read update on the state of competition law and regulation in Australia - see <a href="http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/137424/australian-competition-regulation-what-should-we-expect-during-2016">'Australian competition regulation – What should we expect during 2016?' (Norton Rose Fulbright, 
February 2016) </a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New ACCC Commissioner appointed</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:39:19 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has welcomed the appointment of Mick Keogh as the newest ACCC Commissioner. Mr Keogh is the first agricultural commissioner appointed to the ACCC. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-welcomes-new-commissioner-mick-keogh">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://minister.agriculture.gov.au/joyce/Pages/Media-Releases/appointment-of-ag-commissioner.aspx" target="_blank">media release from the Hon Barnaby Joyce MP</a> announcing the appointment. See also <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-24/government-appoints-new-agriculture-commissioner/7195092" target="_blank">Anna Vidot, 'Mick Keogh appointed as competition watchdog's first ever agricultural commissioner' (ABC, 24 February 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC suspends review timelines on proposed acquisitions of Asciano Ltd</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:58:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC ACCC has suspended review timelines for both proposed acquisitions (Qube and Brookfield consortiums) of Asciano Ltd as a result of this morning's announcement 'of a potential transaction under which the Brookfield Consortium and the Qube Consortium would together facilitate the acquisition of 100% of the issued capital of Asciano.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-suspends-timelines-on-both-proposed-acquisitions-of-asciano-limited" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC priorities</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:49:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, outlined the ACCC's compliance and enforcement priorities at a CEDA event in Sydney today. He indicated that the ACCC would 'continue to take a strong line on cartel conduct, anti-competitive conduct and practices, and where we can, misuse of market power' and stated that he expected one or two criminal cartel prosecutions this year. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-highlights-cartels-indigenous-consumer-protection-and-agriculture-in-2016-priorities" target="_blank">media release</a>. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/accc-compliance-and-enforcement-priorities-for-2016" target="_blank">View speech</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/compliance-and-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> (23 Feb 2016).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Joyce and the effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:06:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There has been plenty more media on the Deputy PM's push for an effects test for misuse of market power: see <a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/30884720/joyce-calling-shots-on-competition-bowen/">Colin Brinsden, 'Firms, farmers back Joyce on effects test' (Yahoo!7, 22 February 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.skynews.com.au/news/politics/federal/2016/02/22/joyce-calling-shots-on-effects-test--bowen.html" target="_blank">'Joyce calling shots on effects test: Bowen' (SkyNews, 22 February 2016 (video))</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/business-v-barnaby-in-effectstest-stoush-20160221-gmzhqm" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'Businss v Barnaby in effects-test stoush' (AFR, 21 February 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/joyce-pushes-for-effects-test-to-boost-small-business-power/news-story/d9cce2a803a6fa24f9b27c4ef370ee93" target="_blank">Joe Kelly, 'Joyce pushes for effects test to boost small business power' (The Australian, 22 February 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Joyce expects government to 'deliver' on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:06:25 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The new deputy PM, Barnaby Joyce, has stated that he expects the government to deliver on the inclusion of an effects test, noting that it is 'imperative that the government resist the threat and the pressure from the BCA and Wesfarmers and one or two other companies and sends a message that they are here for the whole economy and not just a small part of the economy': <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/well-deliver-betterment-for-small-business-barnaby-joyce/news-story/cc4c81e47b8db16a31674e40507fc01f" target="_blank">Joe Kelly, '&quot;We'll deliver betterment for small business&quot;: Barnaby Joyce' (The Australian, 21 February 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clayton Utz updated on proposed competition amendments</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:06:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Clayton Utz has published an update on the proposed competition amendments, focussing on the issue of an effects test and noting the government's decision on misuse of market power provisions is expected by the end of March. See <a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/18_february_2016/20160218/uncertain_effects_an_update_on_proposed_competition_law_amendments.page" target="_blank">Michael Corrigan and Sunita Kenny, 'Uncertain effects: An update on proposed competition law amendments' (Clayton Utz Insights, 18 February 2016)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/24_december_2015/20151224/misuse_of_market_power_will_2016_be_the_year_for_a_new_law.page" target="_blank">Kirsten Webb and Mihkel Wilding, 'Misuse of market power: will 2016 be the year for a new law?' (Clayton Utz Insights, 24 December 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Pact's proposed acquisition of Power Plastics</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:00:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced that it 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Power Plastics Pty Ltd (Power Plastics) by a subsidiary of Pact Group Holdings Limited (Pact) (ASX: PGH).'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-pact%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-power-plastics" target="_blank">media release</a>.  View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1194191/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Overview of submissions on Treasury's Misuse of Market Power discussion paper</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:26:10 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmp-subs.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I've provided an overview of the non-confidential submissions to Treasury's Misuse of Market Power Discussion Paper on <a href="reports/2016mmp-subs.html">my submissions page</a>. Although numbers don't tell the full story, broadly 36 submissions supported options E or F (essentially the Harper Recommendation) or the introduction of an effects test generally; 15 opposed any change to the current provision and 13 submissions either proposed an alternative option to the six presented in the discussion paper or made general observations without identifying a preferred reform option. Full submissions can be downloaded from the <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Options-to-strengthen-the-misuse-of-market-power-law/Submissions" target="_blank">Treasury submission page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Submissions on Treasury's Misuse of Market Power provision now available</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:25:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Treasury has now published the non-confidential submissions to its Discussion Paper on the Harper Panel's proposed changes to s 46. There were 70 submissions received; 7 were confidential. View <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Options-to-strengthen-the-misuse-of-market-power-law/Submissions" target="_blank">Treasury submission page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases 'Small business in focus' report </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:25:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/small-business-in-focus/small-business-in-focus-1-july-2015-to-31-december-2015" target="_blank">July-December 2015 Report on <em>Small business, franchising and industry codes</em></a>.  The majority of complaints received by small business for that period relate to misleading conduct/false representations, consumer guarantees and product safety. Next on the list are competition issues, topped by misuse of market power, with 262 complaints from small business (up 30 on 2014 figures), exclusive dealing, with 212 complaints received and other competition issues generating 165 complaints. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/protecting-small-businesses-remains-high-on-acccs-agenda" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Protecting small businesses remains high on ACCC's agenda' (Press Release, 16 February 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ABL opposes misuse of market power changes</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:23:35 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Lawyers Weekly reports that, in its submission on <a href="reports/2016mmp.html">Treasury's Misuse of Market Power Discussion Paper, </a>Arnold Bloch Leibler has opposed recommendations of the Harper Panel to reform section 46 of the Act. Submissions closed on Friday 12 February; they have not yet been published on the Treasury site. See <a href="http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/17985-firm-opposes-harper-review-reform-to-misuse-of-market-power" target=_blank>Stephanie Garber, 'Firm opposes Harper Review reform to 'misuse of market power' (Lawyers Weekly, 16 February 2016)</a>.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What does figure skating and misuse of market power have in common? Alexandra Merrett explains</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:24:04 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Submissions on misuse of market power due today</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:20:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Submissions on Treasury's discussion paper - 'Options to Strengthen the Misuse of Market Power Law' are due today. See <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Options-to-strengthen-the-misuse-of-market-power-law" target="_blank">Treasury website</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of Market Power campaigning</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:23:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>IGA has joined the small business campaign - '<a href="https://www.letscompete.com.au/" target="_blank">Let's Compete: Change the Law</a>' - to introduce an effects test for misuse of market power.  See also<a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/small-business-ad-campaign-for-effects-test-20160209-gmpul2" target="_blank"> Patrick Durkin, 'IGA takes 'effects test' campaign to the streets' (AFR, 10 February 2016)</a>. The <a href="reports/2015harper-report.html">Harper Report</a> recommended an effects test; the Government is currently engaged in consultation on the misuse of market power provision, with submissions on Treasury's discussion paper - '<a href="reports/2016mmp.html">Options to Strengthen the Misuse of Market Power Law</a>' due Friday.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian Egg Corporation Ltd did not attempt to induce cartel arrangement: Federal Court</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:06:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court (Justice White) has found that Australian Egg Corp Ltd, Farm Pride Foods Ltd and Ironside Management Services Pty Ltd did not attempt to induce a cartel arrangement, as had been alleged by the ACCC. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-finds-australian-egg-corporation-and-egg-producers-did-not-attempt-to-induce-a-cartel-arrangement" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View judgment: <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2016/2016fca0069" target="_blank">Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Egg Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 69</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Woolworths v Mitre 10</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:05:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>SMH reports that Woolworths has written to Mitre 10 reminding it of its competition law obligations after Mitre 10 invited several Home Timber &amp; Hardware franchisees to its annual summit. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/woolworths-threatens-mitre-10-with-accc-action-20160205-gmmf4f.html" target="_blank">'Woolworths threatens Mitre 10 with ACCC action' (SMH, 5 February 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/former-woolworths-chairman-backs-mitre-10-home-merger-20160121-gmbb85.html" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell, 'Former Woolworths chairman backs Mitre 10, Home merger' (SHM, 22 January 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/bunnings-beats-masters-in-home-war-but-it-wont-get-any-easier-for-independents-20160120-gm9owi" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell, 'Bunnings beats Masters in home war but it won't get any easier for independents' (AFR, 22 January 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New deadlines for ACCC assessment of proposed Asciano Ltd acquisitions</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:05:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today set new indicative decision dates of 24 March for its consideration of the two proposed acquisitions of Asciano. The original proposed decision date for both proposed acquisitions was 18 February. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/new-timeline-announced-for-both-proposed-acquisitions-of-asciano-limited" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190562/ItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register (Qube consortium proposal)</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188346/ItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register (Brookfield consortium proposal)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-delays-ruling-on-brookfields-qubes-asciano-takeover-bids-until-late-march-20160204-gmmb05.html" target="_blank">Jenny Wiggins, 'ACCC delays ruling on Brookfield's, Qube's Asciano takeover bids until late March' (SMH, 5 February 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-delays-decision-on-asciano-takeover/news-story/008e80d2ed3494a84d2d393c6d77c248" target="_blank">Andrew White, 'ACCC delays decision on Asciano takeover' (The Australian, 5 February 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/new-accc-timetable-for-asciano-takeover-angers-brookfield/news-story/b38b1782e6e5f6ceb6be66956a46d929" target="_blank">John Durie, 'New ACCC timetable for Asciano takeover angers Brookfield' (The Australian, 5 February 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australia's 'love affair with oligopolies'</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:05:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Peter Strong (Executive Director of the Council of Small Business of Australia) has a piece in today's Smart Company arguing that Australia's 'love affair with oligopolies needs to end'.  The item includes discussion of the misuse of market power provision, arguing that the 'big business lobby's' demands to retain the words take advantage in the provision suggest that 'the biggest businesses Australia has ever seen want to be protected from the law by making the law impossible to prosecute'. Strong calls for implementation of the <a href="reports/2015harper-recs.html">Harper Review's recommendations</a>. See <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/legal/politics/49698-why-australia-s-love-affair-with-oligopolies-needs-to-end.html" target="_blank">Peter Strong, 'Why Australia’s love affair with oligopolies needs to end' (Smart Company, 3 February 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unconscionable conduct case under way</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:04:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC's case against Woolworths' alleging unconscionable conduct is now underway in the Federal Court in Sydney. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/woolworths-unconscionable-conduct-case-kicks-off-in-federal-court-20160130-gmhtoe.html" target=_blank>Sue Mitchell, 'Woolworths' unconscionable conduct case kicks off in Federal Court' (SMH, 31 January 2016)</a>. ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC light on cartel conduct?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:54:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today's Australian compares cartel penalties in Australia with a number of other jurisdictions. ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, points to fines being lower in Australia and renewed hopes that 'this year would see Australia's first conviction in a case of criminal cartel conduct'. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/competition-regulator-accc-light-on-cartel-conduct/news-story/17bb8c3f5e44770c4cf238ad46398030" target="_blank">Leo Shanahan, 'Competition regulator ACCC &quot;light on cartel conduct&quot;' (The Australian, 28 January 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reviewing Anheuser Busch InBev, SABMiller merger</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:54:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has launched a formal review of the proposed multi-billion dollar merger between these Anheuser Busch InBev and SABMiller. Submissions are due by 15 February. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1191932/ItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See eg, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-to-formally-investigate-anheuser-busch-inbev-sabmiller-merger/news-story/a5c9cbec2b2cd6527ff010580b5331a3" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC to formally investigate Anheuser Busch InBev, SABMiller merger' (The Australian, Business Review, 25 January 2016)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/inquiries-brewing-over-beer-merger/news-story/950f5e5a863b76af8f6ea02a030389de" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'Inquiries brewing over beer merger (The Australian, Business REview, 26 January 2016)</a> and <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/froth-around-corona-to-top-acccs-beer-megamerger-review-20160124-gmd8k8.html" target="_blank">Simon Evans, 'Froth around Corona to top ACCC's beer mega-merger review' (SMH, 25 January 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics and the effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:54:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Former Labor competition minister, Craig Emerson has an opinion piece in today's AFR about the effects test: <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/effects-test-is-all-about-the-politics-20160118-gm8899" target="_blank">Craig Emerson, 'Effects test is all about the politics' (AFR, 18 January 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>King: Informed Sources settlement will 'empower petrol consumers'</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:54:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Stephen King has an item in today's <em>The Conversation</em> on the Informed Sources settlement. See <a href="https://theconversation.com/accc-settlement-will-empower-petrol-consumers-53276" target="_blank">Stephen King, 'ACCC settlement will empower petrol consumers' (<em>The Conversation</em>, 18 January 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:53:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR reports ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, pushing for an effects test again (Misa Han, 'ACCC wants to curb oligopoly power' (AFR, 11 January 2016)) and former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel and Wesfarmers chief executive, Richard Goyder, pushing against any change (Misa Han, 'Sims power push runs into trouble' (AFR, 12 January 2016) and Patrick Durkin, 'Goyder joins war over ACCC powers' (AFR, 13 January 2016)). See also 'Double-edged competition law' (AFR, 13 January 2016). Nothing new, but heating up with the latest consultation on misuse of market power laws currently underway (see <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Options-to-strengthen-the-misuse-of-market-power-law" target="_blank">Treasury consultation page</a>)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims seeks second term</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:53:31 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR reports today that Rod Sims is seeking a second term as ACCC Chairman. See Misa Han, 'Busy Sims seeks second term' (AFR, 11 January 2016).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on resolution of Informed Sources proceedings</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:53:10 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Broede Carmody has an item on the resolution of the Informed Sources proceedings in today's Smart Company - see <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/legal/49425-accc-drops-proceedings-against-petrol-retailers-for-using-price-comparison-site-informed-solutions.html" target="_blank">Broede Carmody, 'ACCC drops proceedings against petrol retailers for using price comparison site Informed Solutions' (Smart Company, 4 January 2016)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petrol prices</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:52:52 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Lots of media on petrol prices at the start of the year - see, for example, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/energy/consistency-needed-on-petrol-prices-across-our-cities-20151231-glxbsf.html" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'Consistency needed on petrol prices across our cities' (SMH, 2 January 2016).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC resolved Informed Sources proceedings</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:52:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has resolved Federal Court proceedings it brought against Informed Sources and several petrol retailers after Informed Sources and the retailers agreed to make pricing information available to consumers at the same time the retailers receive it. The ACCC consented to Federal Court orders that proceedings be discontinued and that there be no order as to costs. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/petrol-price-information-sharing-proceedings-resolved" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/woolworths-able-to-keep-using-cheap-fuel-app-and-website-after-accc-decision/news-story/4b22d880e6d00b46cafe23be041827ee" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'Woolworths able to keep using cheap fuel app and website after ACCC decision' (The Australian, 23 December 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-23/petrol-price-info-deal-struck-with-accc/7050056" target="_blank">Michael Janda, 'Petrol price info live for motorists under deal between ACCC, retailers and Informed Sources' (ABC News, 24 December 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC consulting market on Brookfield's proposed undertakings</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:51:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+13626.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1191592&amp;trimFileName=MER15+13626.pdf" target="_blank">commenced consultation</a> on proposed revised undertakings offered by the Brookfield consortium in relation to its proposed acquisition of Asciano. Submissions are due by 22 January with a proposed announcement date of 18 February. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-consult-market-on-proposed-undertakings-from-brookfield" target="_blank">media release</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188346/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes GPC's proposed acquisition of Covs Parts </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:50:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has refused to clear the proposed acquisition by GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd of the Covs Part business from AHG. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-opposes-gpc%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-covs-parts" target=_blank>media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1191442/fromItemId/751046" target=_blank>merger register</a>.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and Coles Express resolve Federal Court proceedings regarding petrol price information sharing</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:50:39 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/current/2014-vid450-informed.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has resolved Federal Court proceedings against Coles Express regarding their subscription to Informed Source's petrol price information sharing service. Coles Express will terminate its subscription to Informed Sources after the current subscription period (ending April 2016) and has provided the ACCC with a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1191419" target=_blank>s 87B court enforceable undertaking</a> in which it commits not to enter into similar price information sharing service agreements and not to give effect to such arrangements following termination of its agreement with Informed Sources. As a result, Justice Murphy yesterday ordered the discontinuation of proceedings against Coles Express. Proceedings continue against Informed Sources and several other petrol retailers. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-and-coles-express-resolve-petrol-price-information-sharing-proceedings" target=_blank>ACCC media release</a>. For further details see me <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/current/2014-vid450-informed.html">case page</a>.]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC's decision in Brookfield merger decision </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:52:47 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <category>Merger</category>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC's <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188346/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a> notes that, at the request of Brookfield, its decision on whether to approve Brookfield consortium's proposed acquisition of Asciano (originally expected on Thursday) has been delayed; new decision date yet to be announced. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-delays-decision-on-9b-asciano-takeover-brookfield-submits-new-plans-20151214-gln1u7.html" target="_blank">Jenny Wiggins, 'ACCC delays decision on $9b Asciano takeover; Brookfield submits new plans' (SMH, 14 December 2015)</a>, Michael <a href="http://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/accc-delays-brookfield-decision-as-ma-frenzy-drags-into-new-year-20151213-glmqe8" target="_blank">Smith, 'ACCC delays Brookfield decision as M&amp;A frenzy drags into new year' (AFR, 14 December 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/brookfield-eases-timetable-for-asciano-bid-clearance/news-story/f98ac854700f7cd65cc456fd8e00f917" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Brookfield eases timetable for Asciano bid clearance' (The Australian, 14 December 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stephen King on Treasury's misuse of market power discussion paper</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:01:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmp.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Stephen King has a piece in today's <em>The Conversation </em>relating to today's release, by Treasury, of a <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/~/media/Treasury/Consultations%20and%20Reviews/Consultations/2015/Options%20to%20strengthen%20the%20misuse%20of%20market%20power%20law/Key%20Documents/PDF/dpoptions_marketpowerlaw.ashx" target="_blank">discussion paper</a> on misuse of market power reform. In it, he expresses some dismay that the options presented in the paper (other than the first option - retention of the status quo) all remove the 'take advantage' element, which he views as essential. See <a href="https://theconversation.com/confusion-reigns-in-options-for-australias-misuse-of-market-power-laws-52195" target="_blank">Stephen King, 'Confusion reigns in options for Australia's misuse of market power laws' (The Conversation, 11 December 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government releases discussion paper on misuse of market power</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:26:53 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Here we go again. The Government has released a 24-page <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/~/media/Treasury/Consultations%20and%20Reviews/Consultations/2015/Options%20to%20strengthen%20the%20misuse%20of%20market%20power%20law/Key%20Documents/PDF/dpoptions_marketpowerlaw.ashx" target=_blank>discussion paper</a> seeking views on options to strengthen the misuse of market power provision in the Act. Submissions due by 12 February ... something fun to do over the Christmas/New Year break. See <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Options-to-strengthen-the-misuse-of-market-power-law" target=_blank>Treasury consultation page</a>. See also <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2016mmp.html">my discussion paper page</a> for further details. ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Congratulations to Alice Muhlebach</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:26:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Congratulations to <a href="https://www.ashurst.com/people-detail.aspx?id_Content=7126" target="_blank">Alice Muhlebach</a>, Partner at Ashurst (Melbourne office), for being named in <a href="http://globalcompetitionreview.com/surveys/1297/40-under-40-2015" target="_blank">GCR's top 40 under 40 antitrust lawyers in the world for 2015</a>. Alice was also the second youngest of the 40 named this years.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on High Court's agreed penalties ruling</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:38:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been some more media and law firm coverage of the High Court's ruling yesterday, which held that parties can make joint submissions with regulators in relation to civil penalties. See, for example, <a href="http://www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/australia-high-court-penalties-civil-proceedings-20151209" target="_blank">Peta Stevenson, Trish Henry and Emma White, 'Australia's High Court reinstates agreed penalties (King&amp;Wood Mallesons, 9 December 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.allens.com.au/pubs/comp/cucomp9dec15.htm" target="_blank">'Significant High Court Decision on Settlement of Regulatory Proceedings' (Allens&gt;&lt;Linklaters Client Update, 9 December 2015)</a>. The High Court also released a useful <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2015/hca-46-2015-12-09.pdf" target="_blank">one page judgment summary</a>. For links to the case, commentary and other resources surrounding this decision see my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/hottopics/agreedpenalties.html"><strong>agreed penalties page</strong></a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court decision in CFMEU agreed penalties case handed down today</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:53:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court judgment in  <em>Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union &amp; Anor v. Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate &amp; Anor</em> (<a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_b45-2015" target="_blank">B45/2015</a>) has now been delivered. It can be viewed on the <a href="http://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/showCase/2015/HCA/46" target="_blank">High Court's page</a> or at <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2015/46.html" title="CFMEU AustLLI" target="_blank">AustLII</a> or <a href="https://jade.barnet.com.au/Jade.html#article=420648" title="CFMEU Jade" target="_blank">Jade</a>. The High Court unanimously allowed the appeals, concluding that the 'decision in <em>Barbaro</em> does not apply to civil penalty proceedings and a court is not precluded from receiving and, if appropriate, accepting an agreed or other civil penalty submission.' (para 1 per French CJ, Kiefel, Bell, Nettle and Gordon JJ). In separate (brief) reasons for judgment, Justice Gageler agreed with the conclusion in the majority reasons that <em>Barbaro </em>does not apply to civil penalty proceedings and joined in the proposed orders. In a separate reasons Justice Keane also agreed that the appeals should be allowed for the reasons given by the majority and made a few additional observations.</p>
<p>See further <a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201512/09/negotiating_agreed_penalties_with_regulators_is_ok_says_high_court.page" target="_blank">Clayton Utz, 'Negotiating agreed penalties with regulators is OK, says High Court' (9 December 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dr Graeme Woodbridge appointed Chief Economist at ACCC</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:11:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has appointed Dr Graeme Woodbridge as its first Chief Economist. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appoints-its-first-chief-economist" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court to rule in CFMEU (agreed penalties) case</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:49:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court has announced it will deliver the judgment in <em>Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Anor v. Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate & Anor</em> (<a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_b45-2015" target="_blank">B45/2015</a>) on Wednesday 9 December. </p>
<p>This case relates to the ability (or otherwise) for parties to agree with the ACCC on penalties to be put before the Court; the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2015/59.html" target="_blank">Full Federal Court held</a> that the High Court's decision in <em>Barbaro </em>(relating to criminal sentencing) should also apply to civil pecuniary penalties and that as a result a Court should have no regard to 'agreed penalties' proposed by the parties. Full case details (including the transcript and/or a <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/cases-av/av-2015-10-13b?movideo_m=1358794" target="_blank">five hour video</a> of the appeal) can be viewed on the <a href="http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_b45-2015" title="CFMEU High Court" target="_blank">High Court's website</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>World Competition Day</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:48:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>Who knew it was a thing? Apparently it is and tomorrow's the day. See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/update/world-competition-day-saturday-5-december" target="_blank">ACCC update</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by certain owner-drivers</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:48:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'is proposing to authorise the Transport Workers Union (TWU) and its owner-driver members in the Adelaide area to bargain as a group with Toll Transport (Toll) for freight-courier contracts'. View <a href="http://accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-collective-bargaining-by-owner-driver-members-of-twu-with-toll-in-south-australia" title="Media - collective bargaining" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1189961/fromItemId/278039" title="Register - collective bargaining" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises Virgin-Etihad Alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:47:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has re-authorised Virgin Australia (ASX: VAH) and Etihad Airways to continue their existing air transport services international alliance, which operates between Australia and the Middle East, for a further five years.' View <a href="http://accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-re-authorises-virgin-etihad-alliance" title="Virgin-Etihad media" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188462/fromItemId/278039" title="Virgin-Etihad authorisation register" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises credit reporting system</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:47:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'granted authorisation for five years to the Australian Retail Credit Association Ltd (ARCA) in relation to principles for exchanging comprehensive consumer credit data between signatory credit reporting bodies and lenders'. View <a href="http://accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-system-to-facilitate-credit-reporting" title="Credit reporting media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184971/fromItemId/278039" title="Credit reporting authorisation" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC concerned about TPP</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:11:05 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC, in a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC%20Submission%20-%20PC%20inquiry%20into%20IP%20arrangements%20in%20Australia%20-%2030%20November.pdf" target="_blank">submission</a> to the <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/intellectual-property#draft" target="_blank">Productivity Commission's IP inquiry</a>, has expressed concerns about IP restrictions in the TPP. While acknowledging that the role of IP rights in promoting innovation and competition is unlikely to raise competition concerns 'in the vast majority of cases', it expresses the view that the extent of current IP protections may go beyond what is necessary. It reiterates its previously expressed view that 'certain IP-related activities under section 51(3)' should be repealed. </p>
           <p>In relation to the TPP, the ACCC notes that the IP chapter of the TPP 'is complex' and questions remain regarding its impact. The ACCC expresses concern (amongst other things) that 'the
             agreement appears to impose IP restrictions beyond existing international treaties, and this
             may tilt the balance in favour of IP rights holders to the detriment of competition and
             consumers.' (p 28). See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/about-us/consultations-submissions/accc-submissions#intellectual-property" target="_blank">ACCC submissions page</a>. </p>
           <p>See also, eg, <a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/589848/accc-concerned-over-trans-pacific-partnership-ip-provisions/" target="_blank">Rohan Pearce, 'ACCC concerned over Trans-Pacific Partnership IP provisions' (Computerworld, 30 November 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/accc-airs-concerns-over-intellectual-property-provisions-in-transpacific-partnership-20151201-glcef0.html" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'ACCC airs concerns over intellectual property provisions in Trans-Pacific Partnership' (SMH, 1 December 2015)</a></p>
           <h3>2 December 2015 - Yazaki decision published</h3>
           <p>The Federal Court's decision in ACCC v Yazaki has been published (<a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2015/2015fca1304" target="_blank">Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation (No 2) [2015] FCA 1304</a>). See also <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-finds-yazaki-corporation-engaged-in-collusive-conduct" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Federal court finds Yazaki corporation engaged in collusive conduct' (26 November 2015)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC extends proposed decision date for Coles' proposed acquisition of 9 Supabarn supermarkets</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:10:24 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the request of the parties, the ACCC has extended the proposed decision date of 3 December 2015 in relation to Coles' proposed acquisition of 9 Supabarn supermarkets A new decision date is yet to be announced. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187175/fromItemId/750991" title="Coles Supabarn register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media and commentary on Government response to Harper Report</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:34:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been plenty of media, academic and legal commentary on the Government's response to the Harper Report. See my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html">media page for a collated set of links to media</a>. See also <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-response.html">government response page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise Qantas - American Airlines Alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:18:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D15+178763.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1191103&amp;trimFileName=D15+178763.pdf" title="Draft determination Qantas AA" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to re-authorise Qantas and American Airlines 'to continue to coordinate their operations on trans-Pacific routes for a further five years.'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-qantas-%E2%80%93-american-airlines-alliance" title="Media release Qantas AA" target="_blank">media release</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187050/fromItemId/278039" title="authorisation register Qantas AA" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose FedEx's proposed acquisition of TNT</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:09:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose FedEx's proposed acquisition of TNT Express NV. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-fedex%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-tnt" title="FedEx media release" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1191065/fromItemId/751046" title="FedEx Merger Register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not accept Brookfield's proposed undertakings</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:33:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has not accepted Brookfield's proffered behavioral undertakings relating to its proposed acquisition of Asciano. The ACCC is yet to determine whether it will oppose the proposed acquisition. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-decides-not-to-accept-brookfield%E2%80%99s-proposed-undertakings" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188346/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose Transurban consortium's proposed acquisition of Brisbane's AirportLink M7</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:33:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of the AirportLink M7 in Brisbane by a Transurban-led consortium. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-transurban-consortiums-proposed-acquisition-of-brisbanes-airportlink-m7" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1191035/fromItemId/751046/" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yazaki guilty of colluding with its competitor</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:32:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Federal Court has found that Yazaki Corporation engaged in collusive conduct with its competitor when supplying wire harnesses to Toyota in Australia. The conduct took place in 2003 and 2008 and breached the exclusionary conduct provisions of the CCA and the Competition Code of Victoria. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-finds-yazaki-corporation-engaged-in-collusive-conduct" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Federal court finds Yazaki corporation engaged in collusive conduct' (26 November 2015)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merrett on government's response to Harper Report</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:32:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Alexandra Merrett has an item published in <em>The Conversation </em>this morning focussing on the Governments agreement with the recommendation to establish a new body in charge of policy development - see <a href="https://theconversation.com/turf-wars-loom-over-new-competition-policy-body-51200" target="_blank">Alexandra Merrett, 'Turf wars loom over new competition policy body', The Conversation, 26 November 2015</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Academic commentary on government's response to Harper Report</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:32:25 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A couple of items were published on The Conversation website today. The first, by Prof Stephen King, praises the response (<a href="https://theconversation.com/harper-response-is-good-economics-and-smart-politics-51191" target="_blank">King, 'Harper response is good economics and smart politics', The Conversation, 25 November 2015</a>); the second, by Prof Caron Beaton-Wells, is critical of the delayed response on the proposed effects test for misuse of market power (<a href="https://theconversation.com/weve-already-had-consultation-on-the-effects-test-more-is-just-a-political-smoke-screen-51246" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells, 'We’ve already had consultation on the effects test: more is just a political smoke screen', The Conversation, 25 November 2015</a>)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government response to Harper </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:32:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>I've summarised the response to most of the 'competition law' recommendations <a href="https://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2015/11/25/harper-response/" target="_blank">here</a>. More detail to follow shortly.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government releases Harper Response</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:31:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-response.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Treasurer, Scott Morrison, today <a href="http://treasury.gov.au/harperreview" target="_blank">released the Government's response</a> to the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper.html">Harper Report</a>. </p>
             <p><a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-response.html">View my quick colour coded overview of the Government's response to each recommendation</a>.</p>
             <p>The Government has accepted most recommendations, but has deferred discussion on the misuse of market power proposal. More specifically, the Government has supported, in whole or part, 44 of the 56 recommendations. Whether it accepts the remaining 12 will depend upon the outcome of further review and consultation. A press release accompanied the response - see <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/013-2015/" target="_blank">'Turnbull Government to promote more choice, better services, stronger growth' (Media Release, 24 November 2015)</a>. The ACCC has welcomed the Government's response - see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-welcomes-the-government%E2%80%99s-response-to-the-harper-review" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC welcomes the Government's response to the Harper Review' (Media Release, 24 November 2015)</a>'</p>
             <p>Plenty of media. See, for example, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/turnbull-government-responds-to-harper-review-into-competition-laws-accepts-majority-of-recommendations-20151124-gl6fh9.html" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'Turnbull government responds to Harper review into competition laws, accepts majority of recommendations' (SMH, 24 November 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-24/effects-test-decision-delayed/6969298" target="_blank">Anna Vidot, 'Federal Government again delays decision on 'effects test' in response to Harper Review' (ABC Rural, 24 November 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/competition-law--harper-proposal-for-effects-test-has-caused-real-concern-20151123-gl5pc0" target="_blank">Jennifer Hewett, 'Competition law – Harper proposal for effects test has caused real concern' (AFR, 23 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Morrison on Harper</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:30:27 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Treasurer, Scott Morrison, yesterday spoke at the Bloombert Summit discussing (amongst other things) competition policy and noting, again, that the 'Government is committed to working with the states on a comprehensive response to the Competition Policy Review conducted by Professor Ian Harper'. See <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/speech/004-2015/" target="_blank">'A National Platform for Economic Growth and Jobs' (Address to the Bloomberg Summit, Sydney, 18 November 2015)</a> (scroll down to 'A more competitive Australia' toward the middle) See also, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-report-front-and-centre/story-e6frg9io-1227614467362" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Harper report front and centre' (The Australian, 19 November 2015)</a> <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/canberra-splits-off-section-46-for-separate-discussion/story-e6frg8zx-1227613388993" target="_blank">and John Durie, 'Canberra splits off Section 46 for separate discussion' (The Australian, 18 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Shell's acquisition of BG</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:37:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will ' not oppose the proposed acquisition by Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) of BG Group (BG).'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-shell%E2%80%99s-acquisition-of-bg" target="_blank">media release</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190874/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie's Harper update</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:37:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/forget-the-pipedreams-jemena-mt-isa-make-sense/story-e6frg9io-1227612881242" target="_blank">John Durie's latest column</a> includes an update on the Harper Review debate (about half way down the column beginning 'Still harping on'). He notes Cabinet will consider the report next week before taking the package to the state treasurers meeting in early December. For now, the s 46 debate will be put on hold and a discussion paper on that section will be issued. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sea Swift withdraws merger authorisation application but remain committed to the acquisition</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:36:51 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Sea Swift has withdrawn its <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations#list" target="_blank">application for merger authorisation</a> from the <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations" target="_blank">Australian Competition Tribunal</a>. The application was lodged following the <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187800/fromItemId/751043" target="_blank">ACCC's announcement (on 9 July 2015) that it would oppose the merger.</a> The Tribunal hearing was scheduled to commence on 30 November. Sea Swift's CEO, Fred White, has <a href="http://www.seaswift.com.au/proposed-acquisition-of-toll-marine-assets-update/" target="_blank">released a statement</a> indicating that both Sea Swift and Toll remain 'fully committed to the proposed acquisition' and that it proposes to amend the application to strengthen the case for approval and then resubmit to the Tribunal. See also <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/documents/act2015/act-9-2015/ACT-9-2015-72-APP-Notice-of-withdrawal.pdf" target="_blank">Notice of Withdrawal</a> (PDF), <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/sea-swift-withdraws-application-for-merger-authorisation" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.           </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Small business and the Harper Review</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:36:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Alexandra Merrett's latest piece in <em>The Conversation </em>discusses some of the less talked about ('less sexy'), but nevertheless significant, recommendations made in the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper.html">Harper Report</a> which, if implemented, would benefit business - particularly small business. See <a href="https://theconversation.com/small-business-cant-afford-to-overlook-the-little-things-in-the-harper-review-50594" target="_blank">Alexandra Merrett, 'Small business can't afford to overlook the little things in the Harper Review' (The Conversation, 17 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Zealand Commerce Act Review</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:30:52 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment today released an<a href="http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/business/competition-policy/targeted-commerce-act-review/?searchterm=commerce%20act" target="_blank"> Issues Paper - <em>Targeted Review of the Commerce Act 1986</em></a> - which addresses three key issues - misuse of market power (s 36), the cease and desist regime and a new market studies function.  The issues paper notes that the Ministry's preliminary view is that the operation of s 36 has 'not been satisfactory' because it appears 'to be failing to maximise the long-term benefit of consumers', it is 'too complex to allow for cost-effective and timely application' and is 'misaligned with other prohibitions' in the Act by relying on a purpose test rather than an 'effects' test. Submissions on the issues paper may be made until 9 February 2016.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gregory: 'The art of undermining the ACCC'</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:30:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Mark Gregory has an item in today's Technology Spectator claiming that the threatening stance adopted by the government toward the ACCC could lead to adverse consumer outcomes. See, <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2015/11/16/technology/art-undermining-accc" target="_blank">Mark Gregory, 'The art of undermining the ACCC' (<em>The Australian</em>, 16 November 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Qube consortium bid review</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:30:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>On Friday the ACCC commenced a public informal review on Qube consortium's bid for Asciano.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190562/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2015/11/16/transport-and-logistics/accc-upgrades-qube-bid-review" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC upgrades Qube bid review' (<em>The Australian </em>Business Review, 16 November 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/asciano-qube-spar-over-due-diligence-for-9bn-takeover-proposal-20151114-gkz978.html" target="_blank"> Jenny Wiggins, 'Asciano, Qube, spar over due diligence for $9bn takeover proposal' (SMH, 16 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Could Sims ruin Christmas?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:28:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Patrick Durkin has an item in today's AFR discussing some of the proposed merger deals currently before the ACCC which are due to be determined just before Christmas. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/economy/why-accc-chair-rod-sims-is-the-regulator-who-might-ruin-christmas-20151111-gkw4st" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'Why ACCC chairman Rod Sims might ruin Christmas' (Australian Financial Review, 14 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Date for ihail authorisation decision extended</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:28:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has extended the date for making a decision on ihail's authorisation application after it received a 'submission from ihail proposing changes to how its smartphone taxi booking app will operate'. Comments are now invited on the revised proposal by 8 December 2015 with an anticipated final decision in Feb/March 2016. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-extends-decision-date-after-ihail-revises-taxi-booking-app" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>; see<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186905/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank"> authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts SeaLink undertaking</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:27:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has 'accepted an <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190674" target="_blank">undertaking from SeaLink Travel Group</a> as part of its acquisition of Transit Systems Ferries Group', notwithstanding the fact that the acquisition itself 'does not raise competition issues'. See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-accepts-sealink-undertaking-to-maintain-remedy-in-vehicle-ferry-services" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commentary on ACCC/NDRC MOU</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:24:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Emma White has published a piece on the recent MOU between the ACCC and China's NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission of the PRC) which provides for information sharing and cooperation in relation to competition enforcement, particularly in relation to cartels. See, <a href="http://incompetition.com.au/2015/11/mounting-coordinated-approach-enforcement/" target="_blank">Emma White, 'Mounting a coordinated approach to enforcement' (<em>In Competition</em>, 9 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Liability for cartel facilitators</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:24:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>James Gould recently published an item on recent developments on liability for cartel facilitators in Europe and Australia - see <a href="http://incompetition.com.au/2015/10/recent-developments-liability-cartel-facilitators/" target="_blank">James Gould, 'Recent developments on liability for cartel facilitators' (<em>In Competition</em>, 30 October 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on digital disruption</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:55:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has given an interview to <em>The Australian</em> in which he discusses the proliferation of digital start-ups, like Uber and Airbnb. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-chair-welcomes-digital-disrupters/story-e6frg8zx-1227601400761" target="_blank">'ACCC chair welcomes digital disrupters' (The Australian, 9 November 2015)</a> for the video (approx 6 minutes). The Chairman also notes in the interview that the ACCC has no competition issues with Coles and Woolworths and that it considers that the s 46 debate has nothing to do with Coles and Woolworths. For the full version of the interview - the lateset in the KGB Podcast series - see <a href="https://itunes.apple.com/au/podcast/kgb-podcast-series-fair-competition/id1008023785?i=356386887&amp;mt=2" target="_blank">Episode 19 on Fair Competition</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulating unilateral supermarket misconduct</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:54:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Prof Stephen Corones has a new article out in the latest ABLR on the regulation of unilateral supermarket misconduct as a customer/acquirer of goods and services with particular attention given to <em>ACCC v Coles</em> and the effectiveness of s 46 as a 'consumer protection measure': <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2015/2015corones-supermarket.html">Stephen Corones, 'Regulating unilateral supermarket misconduct as customer/acquirer of goods and services'
               ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to review Sonic Healthcare's proposed acquisition of Adelaide Pathology Partners</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:54:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will conduct a public review of Sonic's proposed acquisition of Adelaide Pathology Partners, noting that 'the position of Sonic and APP as two of the four biggest suppliers of pathology services in South Australia' means the focus of the investigation will be on 'whether the removal of APP as a competitor would substantially lessen competition between pathology service providers in South Australia'. Responses to a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+11548.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1190666&amp;trimFileName=MER15+11548.pdf" target="_blank">market inquiries letter</a> are due by 13 November. The ACCC has not posted an expected decision date given it anticipates the proposed acquisition may be completed before the ACCC can finalise its review. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-review-sonic-healthcare%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-adelaide-pathology-partners" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190659/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on ACCC's merger SOI's</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 13:54:25 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>John Durie's latest column discusses the ACCC's recent succession of merger SOIs, most recently the proposed Recall-First Mountain merger - see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-waves-red-flag-over-recall-first-mountain-merger-deal/story-e6frg9io-1227597970720?sv=d8631f0f66f10cb512dfd5b7bc7499b0" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC waves red flag over Recall-First Mountain merger deal' (The Australian, 6 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telstra appeals ACCC pricing decision</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 13:54:04 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Telstra has appealed the ACCC's recent fixed-line pricing decision to the Federal Court. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/telstra-to-fight-accc-price-cuts-in-the-federal-court-20151105-gkrptb.html" target="_blank">David Ramli, 'Telstra to fight ACCC price cuts in the Federal Court' (SMH, 6 November 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-telstra-on-collision-course/story-e6frg8zx-1227597971203" target="_blank">Mitchell Bingemann, 'ACCC, Telstra on collision course' (The Australian, 6 November 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on media laws, IP and recent ACCC competition activity</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:53:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, delivered a speech at the RBB Economics Conference in Sydney this morning. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-says-better-media-and-intellectual-property-regulations-can-boost-innovation" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/promoting-innovation-through-competition" target="_blank">speech - 'Promoting innovation through competition'</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases another Statement of Issues</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:53:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The latest in a recent swath of SOI releases involves Iron Mountain's proposed acquisition of Recall Holdings. The ACCC's indicated that its 'preliminary view is that the proposed acquisition would raise competition concerns in a number of markets for the supply of physical document management services'.  Submissions due by 19 November with announcement expected 15 December.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-acquisition-of-recall-holdings-by-iron-mountain" target="_blank">media release</a>. View merger <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188710/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Vocus's proposed acquisition of M2</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:53:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Vocus's proposed acquisition of M2. View  <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-vocus%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-m2" target="_blank">media release</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>China/Australia MOU</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:52:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC and the National Development and Reform Commission of the PRC (NDRC) have signed a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Memorandum of understanding between the National Development and Reform Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.pdf" target="_blank">MOI</a> relating to international cartel investigations which affect Australian and Chinese markets. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australia-and-china-to-cooperate-on-cartel-investigations" target="_blank">media release</a>.             </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: 'How did the light handed regulation of monopolies become no regulation?'</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:52:31 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, delivered a speech at the Gilbert + Tobin Regulated Infrastructure Policy Workshop in Melbourne today, calling for a 'return to the approach to regulation of monopoly infrastructure envisaged by the Hilmer Committee' and arguing 'it is wrong to suggest that we should not be concerned about high monopoly pricing of infrastructure because the result is only a pure transfer of economic rent.' <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/how-did-the-light-handed-regulation-of-monopolies-become-no-regulation" title="Sims Speech 29 Oct" target="_blank">View speech</a>. View media release: '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-believes-price-monitoring-for-monopoly-infrastructure-will-damage-australia%E2%80%99s-economy" target="_blank">ACCC believes price monitoring for monopoly infrastructure will damage Australia's economy</a>'.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court declares Exclusive Dealing by Calvary</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:52:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Federal Court has declared (by consent) that Calvary (the Little Company of Mary Health Care Ltd <em>and </em>Calvary Health Care Riverina Ltd), by adopting by-laws relating to the accreditation of medical practitioners, had engaged in <a href="law/ed.html">exclusive dealing</a> conduct that was likely to have the effect of substantially lessening competition in the day surgery market in Wagga Wagga.  Proceedings were otherwise dismissed, subject to the respondents paying the ACCC's costs in the agreed amount of $100,000. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/calvary-agrees-to-remove-exclusive-dealing-bylaws-following-accc-action" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to appoint Chief Economist</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:51:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In his address to the Competition Law and Economics Workshop this morning, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, announced that the ACCC would 'shortly' be appointing a Chief Economist. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/opening-address-13th-annual-competition-law-economics-workshop" target="_blank">View speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims opens competition conference</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:51:34 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, this morning gave the opening address at the 13th annual Competition Law and Economics Workshop in Adelaide, now co-hosted by the ACCC in conjunction with the University of South Australia. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/opening-address-13th-annual-competition-law-economics-workshop" target="_blank">View speech</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-discusses-competition-law-and-economics" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.             </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues SOI on proposed acquisition of Baker Hughes by Halliburton</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:51:15 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC this morning issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+10934.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1190316&amp;trimFileName=MER15+10934.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of Baker Hughes by Halliburton. The ACCC has expressed concern that the acquisition would result in the merged entity being one of only a small number of suppliers that could service the relevant markets' and particular concern 'in relation to the supply of complex or high-risk projects, such as off-shore drilling projects'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-soi-on-proposed-acquisition-of-baker-hughes-by-halliburton" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185989/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny authorisation to Cotton Shippers Association</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:50:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In a draft determination released this morning, the ACCC proposes to deny authorisation to Cotton Shippers Association 'for coordination between its merchant members to change the way the industry classes cotton for contracts between growers and merchants.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-deny-authorisation-to-cotton-shippers-association" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187952/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose Foxtel and Ten acquisitions</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:50:31 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC today announced 'that it will not oppose the proposed acquisitions by Foxtel ... and Ten ...'. ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, noted that while 'the acquisitions will lead to a greater alignment of Foxtel’s and Ten’s interests, and will increase the degree of influence Foxtel has over Ten, the ... proposed acquisitions, on their own, are unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition”. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-foxtel-and-ten-acquisitions" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190276/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/accc-approves-ten-and-foxtel-tieup-20151021-gkf3xd.html" target="_blank">Max Mason, 'ACCC approves Ten and Foxtel tie-up' (SMH, 22 October 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Menezes on Labor and the competition review</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:49:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Economics Professor, Flavio Menezes, has an item in today's <em>The Conversation</em>, arguing that Labor should 'come to the party' on the Harper reforms. In relation to s 46, in particular, he argues that the proposed changes make sense and that while it is 'clear why big business would oppose such changes, the rationale for Labor’s opposition is less clear'. See <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-labor-should-come-to-the-party-on-the-competition-review-49354" target="_blank">Flavio Menezes, 'Why Labor should come to the party on the competition review' (The Conversation, 21 October 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on grocery code</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:49:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has spoken at the Australian Food and Grocery Council Industry Leaders Forum in Canberra today.  View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/new-and-emerging-issues-in-the-grocery-sector" target="_blank">speech</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/accc-chairman-warns-retailers-over-grocery-code-20151019-gkdahj.html" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell, 'ACCC chairman warns retailers over grocery code' (SMH, 21 October 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SOI on GPC's proposed acquisition of Covs Parts</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:48:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+10825.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1190253&amp;trimFileName=MER15+10825.pdf" title="SOI Covs Parts" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on GPC Asia Pacific Pty Lt's proposed acquisition of the Covs Parts Business from Automotive Holdings Group Ltd. The ACCC's 'preliminary view is that the proposed acquisition would raise competition concerns in the supply of automotive parts and accessories to trade customers in nine regional towns in Western Australia'.  Submissions may be made until 5 November. Final decision expected 26 November. See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-gpc%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-covs-parts" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188792/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">public register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases report on the private health insurance industry</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:48:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a report on the private heath insurance industry.  See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-report-on-the-private-health-insurance-industry" target="_blank">media release</a>.  See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/publications/private-health-insurance-reports/private-health-insurance-report-2013-14" target="_blank">report</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reviewing proposed BrisConnections acquisition</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:48:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has commenced a review into the proposed acquisition of BrisConnections by a Transurban consortium. Submissions from interested parties are due by 30 October with a proposed date for decision of 26 November 2015. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1190183/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-probes-transurban-role-in-possible-brisconnections-purchase/story-e6frg8zx-1227573952741" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC probes Transurban role in possible BrisConnections purchase' (The Australian, 19 October 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fisse on the Harper Report</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 13:47:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p><a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a> delivered a paper on the Harper Report in New Zealand on Friday - it provides a useful analysis of the key recommendations in the report relating to the competition laws. See <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/images/Fisse_Harper_Report_Critique_%28Oct_2015%29.pdf" target="_blank">Brent Fisse,  'The Australian Competition Policy Review Final Report 2015: Sirens' Call or Lyre of Orpheus?' (NZ Competition Law &amp; Policy Institute, 26th Annual Workshop, Auckland, 16 Oct 2015)</a> (PDF - available on <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/publications.html" target="_blank">Brent Fisse Lawyers website</a>)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report back on agenda</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:47:24 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Treasurer Scott Morrison met with state and territory treasurers in Sydney today, with the Harper Report high on the agenda. Mr Morrison has referred to the Harper Report as an 'outstanding report' 'has the potential to unlock, if acted upon, enormous economic opportunities for Australia'.   In response to a direct question about when we can expect a formal response to the Harper Review, Mr Morrison indicated he would be looking to 'move that forward over the next few weeks and with Cabinet meeting between now and Christmas, well, I will look to a timetable that would see that to be able to be presented hopefully before Christmas ... it's an outstanding report and in many ways it's been overshadowed by just one recommendation regarding Section 46 which is a very important recommendation ... The broader more fundamental reforms that are proposed in the Harper Review, I think, you can expect the Government to have a very enthusiastic response to and I was encouraged by the state and territory Treasurers today about their willingness to engage in that type of process. '  See <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/transcript/018-2015/" target="_blank">The Hon Scott Morrison MP, Transcript of Press Conference, Sydney, 16 October 2015</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/turnbull-government-revives-harper-review-that-was-iced-under-tony-abbott-20151016-gkavsy.html" target="_blank">Gareth Hutchens, 'Turnbull government revives Harper review that was iced under Tony Abbott
               ' (SMH, 16 October 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foxtel-Ten decision expected next week</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:47:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC will hand down its final decision on Foxtel's proposed investment in the Ten Network next week; see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-to-remain-centre-of-attention-with-foxtel-ten-decision/story-e6frg9io-1227571431727" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC to remain centre of attention with Foxtel-Ten decision' (The Australian, 16 October 2015)</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187261/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asciano media</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:45:47 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Plenty of media following the ACCC's issue of a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+10579.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1190145&amp;trimFileName=MER15+10579.pdf" title="SOI Brookefield" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of Asciano Ltd by Brookfield. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/accc-raises-concerns-over-asciano-buy/story-e6frg90f-1227569802180" target="_blank">Mitchell Neems, 'ACCC raises concerns over Asciano buy' (The Australian, 15 October 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-competition-watchdog-is-concerned-at-the-massive-asciano-takeover-2015-10" target="_blank">Chris Pash 'The competition watchdog is concerned at the massive Asciano takeover' (Business Insider Australia, 15 October 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2015/10/15/accc-holds-12-billion-asciano-takeover" target="_blank">AAP, 'ACCC holds up $12 billion Asciano takeover' (SBS, 15 October 2015)</a>, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/10/14/asciano-ma-brookfield-asset-idUKL3N12E5TP20151014" target="_blank">Reuters, 'Australian regulator sees antitrust concerns on Brookfield Asciano buyout' (Reuters UK, 15 October 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC release SOI on proposed Brookfield acquisition of Asciano</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:12:22 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC this morning released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+10579.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1190145&amp;trimFileName=MER15+10579.pdf" title="SOI Brookefield" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of Asciano Ltd by Brookfield. It has noted concerns that the 'vertical integration lead to a substantial lessening of competition in related markets for the supply of above rail haulage services in WA and Queensland', noting that existing state access regimes do not currently address competition issues arising from vertical integration and also that 'competition is to be preferred to regulation whenever possible'. Submissions on the SOI are invited until 4 November 2015 with a final decision expected on 17 December 2015. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-soi-on-the-proposed-acquisition-of-asciano-limited-by-brookfield" title="Brookfield press release" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188346/fromItemId/750991" title="Brookfield merger register" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CFMEU and Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate appeal heard</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:37:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Appeal against the Full Federal Court decision <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2015/59.html" target="_blank"><em>Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union</em> [2015] FCAFC 59</a> was heard by the full bench of the High Court yesterday. The outcome will have implications  in relation to the submission of agreed penalties in civil cases. Decision reserved. <a href="https://jade.barnet.com.au/Jade.html#article=414869" target="_blank">View transcript</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Morrison on competition</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:12:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Treasurer, Scott Morrison, who has now taken control of competition policy, held talks with Prof Ian Harper last week and has since indicated an intention to 'embrace th spirit of' the Harper Report, noting that the report is much broader than the 'effects test' recommendation that has dominated the debate. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/treasury/scott-morrison-to-press-state-treasurers-on-driving-competition/story-fn59nsif-1227568065891?sv=3a886b1504e3bf818012e36203a0b894" target="_blank">David Uren, 'Scott Morrison to press state treasurers on driving competition' (The Australian, 14 October 2015).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effect of effects test </title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:11:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Daniel Jacobs has an item in Dynamic Business on the effects test: see <a href="http://www.dynamicbusiness.com.au/featured/the-effects-test-what-are-the-effects.html" target="_blank">Daniel Jacobs, 'The effects test: What are the effects?' (Dynamic Business, 14 October 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects test back in news</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:11:38 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The effects test proposal for s 46 has found its way back into the news, with an AFR editorial arguing 'Turnbull should resist effects test' and Collin Bettles reporting on renewed calls for the amendment by Senator Canavan: see <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/editorials/turnbull-should-resist-effects-test-20151011-gk6ez4?stb=twt" target="_blank">Editorial, 'Turnbull should resist effects test' (AFR, 11 October 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/effects-test-to-protect-farmers/2745059.aspx?storypage=0#" target="_blank">Colin Bettles, 'Effects test' to protect farmers' (The Land, 12 October 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny authorisation of ihail taxi booking app</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:11:22 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is proposing to deny authorisation for a joint venture between ihail Pty Ltd and Australian and international taxi networks for a new smartphone taxi booking app. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-deny-authorisation-of-ihail-taxi-booking-app" title="iHail ACCC media release" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186905/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.  See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/accc-rejects-taxi-industrys-counter-to-uber-20151011-gk6n9j.html" target="_blank">Matt O'Sullivan, 'ACCC rejects taxi industry's counter to Uber' (SMH, 12 October 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC requires drop in Telstra access price</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:11:05 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In its  <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/fixed-line-services/fixed-line-services-fad-inquiry-2013/final-decision" target="_blank">final access decision</a> today the ACCC has required Telstra to cut the access price to its declared fixed line services by 9.4% The new pricing begins from the start of November. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-fixed-line-services-decision-leads-to-one-off-uniform-fall-in-access-prices-of-94" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/accc-orders-telstra-to-cut-access-prices/story-e6frgakx-1227562986665" target="_blank">Michael Roddan, 'ACCC orders Telstra to cut access prices' (Business Spectator, The Australian, 9 October 2015)</a>             </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merrett on "Supermarket Monsters"</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:10:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Alexandra Merret has just published a LinkedIn item on &quot;Supermarket Monsters&quot;, critiquing a <a href="https://www.penguin.com.au/products/9781863957304/supermarket-monsters-price-coles-and-woolworths-dominance-redback" title="Supermarket monsters" target="_blank">book recently published by Malcolm Knox</a>. See <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/supermarket-monsters-reality-check-another-australian-merrett" target="_blank">Alexandra Merrett, 'Supermarket Monsters: a reality check for another Australian myth' (LinkedIn Pulse, 7 October 2015)</a>. See also <a href="https://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/files/dmfile/Session2-MerrettSmithpaper2.pdf" target="_blank">Alexandra Merrett and Rhonda L Smith, 'The Australian Grocery Sector: structurally irredeemable?' (2013)</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/supermarket-monsters-can-be-agents-of-change-44303" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells, 'Supermarket monsters can be agents of change' (The Conversation, 7 July 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Online hotel price parity requirements under scrutiny</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:10:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In response to the ACCC's industry consultation on price parity requirements in the industry, Expedia CFO, Mark Okerstrom, has claimed that the arrangements help to boost sales. See <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/expedia-defends-hotel-contracts-being-scrutinised-by-accc-20151007-gk3inh.html" target="_blank">Jamie Freed, 'Expedia defends hotel contracts being scrutinised by ACCC' (The Age, 7 October 2015)
</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/hotels-urge-accc-to-take-action-against-expedia-and-priceline-20151005-gk1y3d.html" target="_blank">Jamie Freed, 'Hotels urge ACCC to take action against Expedia and Priceline' (SMH, 6 October 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/aviation/expedia-and-priceline-pricing-practices-under-accc-scrutiny-20150910-gjjeuy.html" target="_blank">Jamie Freed, 'Expedia and Priceline pricing practices under ACCC scrutiny' (SMH, 10 September 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vertical integration ACCC's main concern in Brookfield/Asciano deal</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:10:11 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, has indicated that the main concern raised in submissions on Brookfield's proposed takeover of Asciano relate to vertical integration. The ACCC is expected to indicate whether it has any concerns about the merger by 15 October. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/vertical-integration-the-main-issue-in-brookfield-bid-for-asciano-says-accc-chair-20151005-gk1p68.html" target="_blank">Jenny Wiggins, 'Vertical integration 'the main issue' in Brookfield bid for Asciano, says ACCC chair' (SMH, 6 October 2015)</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188346/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register.</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review at top of agenda for next meeting of Australian treasurers</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 10:09:53 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Australian reports that new Treasurer, Scott Morrison, has put the Harper recommendations 'at the top of the agenda for the next meeting of Australian treasurers' on October 16. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/treasury/scott-morrison-puts-states-on-notice-over-health-education-savings/story-fn59nsif-1227554743296?sv=9de56ff3dbe2f9c42259b0efbf6e307" target="_blank">Dennis Shanahan, 'Scott Morrison puts states on notice over health, education savings' (The Australian, 3 October 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases statement of issues on proposed acquisition of Energy Australia's Iona Gas Plant by APA Group</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:09:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+10113.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1189916&amp;trimFileName=MER15+10113.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of EnergyAustralia’s Iona Gas Plant (Iona) by APA Group'.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-the-proposed-acquisition-of-energyaustralia%E2%80%99s-iona-gas-plant-by-apa-group" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188503/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPA calls for competition reform</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:09:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Institute of Public Accountants has 'called on the government to get on with the job of competition policy reform via the Harper Review' - see <a href="http://www.accountantsdaily.com.au/breaking-news/8569-ipa-urges-government-to-get-on-with-it" target="_blank">Mitchell Turner, 'IPA urges govt to &quot;get on with it&quot;' (Accountants Daily, 30 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BCA warning on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:08:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>BCA president, Catherine Livingstone, has warned that the introduction of an effects test would threaten state-based pricing and technological innovation. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/bcas-catherine-livingstone-warns-effects-tests-may-curb-innovation/story-e6frg8zx-1227548046503" target="_blank">Joe Kelly, 'BCA’s Catherine Livingstone warns effects tests may curb innovation' (The Australian, 29 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Food and Grocery code</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:08:24 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a press release indicating concerns over the implementation of the Food and Grocery Code of Conduct. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concerned-over-implementation-of-the-food-and-grocery-code" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC concerned over implementation of the Food and Grocery code' (ACCC Media Release, 24 September 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harris on competition reform: speech available</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:47:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Productivity Commission Chairman, Peter Harris, delivered an address to the <a href="http://www.competition-policy-summit.com.au/" target="_blank">Australian Competition Policy Summit </a>today - the speech is now available from the <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/news-media/speeches/competition-policy-summit-2015" target="_blank">PC website</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harris on competition reform</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:11:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Productivity Commission chairman, Peter Harris, will speak at the <a href="http://www.competition-policy-summit.com.au/" target="_blank">Australian Competition Policy Summit </a>today, calling for action on the Harper competition policy reforms. He will claim the disproportionate focus on s 46 'as a totem for competition policy reform' is 'absurd', noting the significant scope for gains amongst the other proposed reforms. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columnists/alan-mitchell/peter-harris-calls-for-action-on-competition-reform-20150921-gjrjb6" target="_blank">Alan Mitchell, 'Peter Harris calls for action on competition reform' (AFR, 21 September 2015)</a>. See also, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/turbulent-times-ahead-despite-turnbulls-strong-start-20150921-gjrhvi.html" target="_blank">Mark Kenny and Peter Martin, 'Turbulent times ahead despite Malcolm Turnbull's strong start' (SMH, 22 September 2015)k</a> quoting Mr Harris as saying: &quot;For too long now, under governments of both political persuasions, major reports seem to be left to languish if they no longer suit the immediate political agenda&quot;.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rod Sims on the importance of effective competition</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:11:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has spoken to the '<a href="http://www.competition-policy-summit.com.au/" target="_blank">Australian Competition Policy Summit </a>on the importance of competition and the Harper Review'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-emphasises-the-importance-of-effective-competition" target="_blank">media release</a> (no published speech).</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie: "Harper on Hold ..."</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:10:48 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie's piece in today's Australian discusses the appointment of new Assistant Treasurer, Kelly O'Dwyer, who will take over the small business portfolio, including the response to the Harper Report. He notes that the change in minister 'puts the Harper review on the backburner' for now, and speculates that the new Treasurer, Scott Morrison, may take control of competition policy. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-review-decision-on-hold-but-watch-this-space/story-e6frg9io-1227536790375" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Harper Review decision on hold but watch this space' (The Australian, 21 September 2015).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kelly O'Dwyer MP to replace Bruce Billson MP as small business minister</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:10:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Malcolm Turnbull's cabinet reshuffle sees <a href="http://www.kellyodwyer.com.au/" target="_blank">Kelly O'Dwyer MP</a> take over from Bruce Billson MP as small business minister (with responsibility for the Harper Review). O'Dwyer also takes on the role of Assistant Treasurer. O'Dwyer (a lawyer who previously practised in corporate law) has been Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer since December last year and is Chairman of the House of Rep's Standing Committee on Economics, amongst other things. As economic policy adviser to the former Treasurer, Peter Costello, her responsibilities included competition law and policy and consumer protection. See, eg, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/turnbulls-reshuffle-is-an-opportunity-for-good-government/story-fnp85ntp-1227536426176" target="_blank">Robert Gottliebsen, 'Turnbull’s reshuffle is an opportunity for good government' (The Australian, Business Spectator, 21 September 2015)</a> (optimistic about the change) and cf <a href="http://switzer.com.au/the-experts/peter-switzer-expert/has-malcolm-made-a-small-business-mistake-already/" target="_blank">Peter Switzer, 'Has Malcolm made a small business mistake already?' (Switzer Daily, 21 September 2015)</a> (lamenting the loss of Bruce Billson from this role). See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/special-reports/afr-national-policy-series/malcolm-turnbulls-cabinet-kelly-odwyer-minister-for-revenue-20150920-gjqwqz" target="_blank">Jacob Greber, 'Malcolm Turnbull's cabinet: Kelly O'Dwyer 'minister for revenue'' (AFR, 20 September 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/malcolm-turnbulls-reshuffle-is-a-game-changer/story-fn59niix-1227536136736?sv=265dd8d51d1db4846328c8fb0b671561" target="_blank">David Crowe, 'Malcolm Turnbull's reshuffle is a game changer' (The Australian, 21 September 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The ACCC v Visa settlement</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:10:06 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Glibert + Tobin's latest update in competition and regulation looks at the ACCC v Visa settlement - see <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/rv/ff0022124ef19465d71162c42646ab1a9f232231" target="_blank">Simon Snow, Matt Rubintein, Alexandra Lazar, 'Strange currencies: looking for meaning in the ACCC v Visa settlement' (Gilbert + Tobin, September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson rejects claims from anti-effects test lobby</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:00:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Small Busines Minister, Bruce Billson, has again rejected claims by the BCA that the proposed s 46 effects test would threaten competition. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/bruce-billson-rejects-antieffects-test-lobbys-claims-of-voter-backlash-20150917-gjp270.html" target="_blank">Catie Low, 'Bruce Billson rejects anti-effects test lobby's claims of voter backlash' (SMH, 17 September 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Uren: 'Give healthy competition a chance'</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:00:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>David Uren has a piece in the Australian today calling on the new PM to follow through with the Harper competition reforms. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/give-healthy-competition-a-chance/story-e6frg9qo-1227530776567" title="Uren article" target="_blank">David Uren, 'Give healthy competition a chance' (The Australian, 17 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Macquarie's bid for Esanda</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:59:47 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Macquarie's bid for the Esanda Dealer finance business from the ANZ, concluding that 'the possible acquisition was not likely to substantially lessen competition in the market for the supply of bailment finance and point-of-sale (POS) finance facilities to motor vehicle dealerships.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-not-to-oppose-macquarie%E2%80%99s-bid-for-esanda" title="ACCC media Macquarie" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1189650/fromItemId/751046" title="ACCC merger register Macquarie" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statement of Issues released on proposed Shell acquisition of BG</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:43:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released another <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+9636.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1189653&amp;trimFileName=MER15+9636.pdf" title="Shell SOI">Statement of Issues</a> today - this time in relation to Royal Dutch Shell's proposed acquisition of BG Group. The ACCC has expressed concern that 'by aligning Shell’s interest in Arrow Energy with BG’s LNG facilities in Queensland, the proposed acquisition may change Shell’s incentives such that it will prioritise supply to BG’s LNG facilities over competing gas users. As a result, Shell could choose to direct more (and possibly all) of Arrow’s large gas reserves towards meeting BG’s contracts to supply LNG export markets. This would remove some or all of Arrow’s gas from the domestic market'. Submissions on the SOI are invited until 8 October 2015 with a final decision expected 12 November 2015. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-acquisition-of-bg-by-shell" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186999/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects test back on the table as part of Nationals' coalition agreement with the new PM</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:42:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Cabinet will seriously consider the 'effects test' as part of the new PM's deal with the Nationals. See, for example, <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/election/malcolm-turnbull-woos-nationals-with-competition-backflip-4b-deal-20150915-gjn0ke" target="_blank">Laura Tingle, 'Malcolm Turnbull woos Nationals with competition backflip, up to $4b deal' (AFR, 16 September 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2015/9/15/national-affairs/cabinet-consider-effects-test" target="_blank">AAP, 'Cabinet to consider 'effects test'' (Business Spectator, 15 September 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-16/why-is-the-effects-test-causing-so-much-heartburn/6779366" target="_blank">Nick Grimm, 'Why is the 'Effects Test' causing so much heartburn for businesses large and small?' (ABC News (3min audio), 16 September 2015) (featuring Allan Fels)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/malcolm-turnbull-nats-win-concessions-as-senators-cross-floor/story-fn59niix-1227529247799?sv=fcc6197cf5d75b3caef58313db690ec6" target="_blank">Joe Kelly, 'Malcolm Turnbull: Nats win concessions as senators cross floor' (The Australian, 16 September 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/malcolm-turnbull-unites-coalition-business-hopes-surge-20150914-gjmnkq" target="_blank">Phillip Coorey, 'Malcolm Turnbull unites Coalition, business hopes surge' (AFR, 15 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nationals cross floor on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:42:25 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Three National party senators crossed the floor in support of a motion by the Greens advocating an effects test. Senator Whish-Wilson moved that the Senate note the call for the introduction of an effects test by the Harper Review, the support for it by a number of organisations and that the 'National Party unanimously passed a motion at its National Conference calling for the introduction of an effects test' and called on the Government to bring forward legislation to amend section 46. Statements were then made by Senator Whish-Wilson, Senator Fifield and Senator Canavan. The question was negatives by a vote of 33-17. See <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/sep/15/nationals-senators-cross-floor-to-back-greens-on-competition-law-changes" target="_blank">'Nationals senators cross floor to back Greens on competition law changes' (The Guardian, 15 September 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A&quot;chamber/hansards/398c2cc8-a26c-4267-8f40-f3819972c93d/0071&quot;" target="_blank">Hansard</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Statement of Issues in relation to Foxtel/Ten deal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:42:03 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="11 September 2015 - New The State of Competition out now" title="SOI Foxtel Ten" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> in relation to Foxtel's proposed acquisition arrangements with the Ten Network. The ACCC has indicated it is concerned that the 'proposed acquisitions have the potential to substantially lessen competition for the supply of free-to-air television services in Australia, particularly in the broadcasting of sports content' and 'may increase the likelihood of Ten and Foxtel entering into joint bids and other commercial arrangements for acquisition of sports rights, to the exclusion of other free-to-air networks.' The ACCC has also expressed concern that 'the proposed acquisitions may reduce competition in the sale of advertising, including by further consolidation in this market, and by removing or reducing competition between Ten and Foxtel for advertising sales'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-foxtel-and-ten-acquisitions" title="Media release Ten Foxtel" target="_blank">media release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187261/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a> for further details.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New The State of Competition out now</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:41:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/TSoC-Issue-23-Gal.pdf" target="_blank">Issue 23 of <em>The State of Competition</em></a> was published today.  In it, the authors (Alexandra Merrett, Rachel Trindade and Rhonda Smith) discuss 'competition policy for the oligopoly economy', focussing on the research conducted by Michal Gal on competition policy for small business.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statement of Issues for Coles' proposed acquisition of Supabarn supermarkets</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:41:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC today released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+9436.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1189139&amp;trimFileName=MER15+9436.pdf" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> in relation to Coles' proposed acquisition of 9 Supabarn supermarkets. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-coles%E2%80%99-proposed-acquisition-of-nine-supabarn-supermarkets" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC calls for comment on Coles’ proposed acquisition of nine Supabarn supermarkets' (ACCC Media Release, 11 September 2015)</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187175/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC delays Foxtel-Ten decision</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:41:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has delayed its announcement in relation to the proposed acquisition by Foxtel of a stake in the Ten Network. The announcement was due tomorrow, but will be deferred until Monday. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/accc-delays-foxtel-ten-decision-to-next-week/story-e6frg996-1227519449356" target="_blank">Darren Davidson, 'ACCC delays Foxtel-Ten decision to next week' (The Australian, 9 September 2015).</a> See also <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187261/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:30:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Another item today in SMH on the push by some coalition MP's to introduce the proposed effects test into s 46. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/mps-urge-government-rethink-on-effects-test-to-help-small-business-20150908-gjhh3u.html?stb=twt" target="_blank">James Massola and Matthew Knott, 'Liberal MPs urge government rethink on effects test to help small business' (SMH, 8 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visa to pay $18m penalty for CCA breaches (but not s 46)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:19:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>As <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/visa-faces-20m-fine-in-landmark-accc-case-20150901-gjcpw5.html" target="_blank">foreshadowed on Tuesday</a>, Visa has been ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty of $18m for anti-competitive conduct. However, the ACCC points out that, contrary to earlier reports, the matter was not resolved on the basis of admitted contraventions of s 46 of the Act; rather Visa admitted contravention of s 47 (exclusive dealing) and, to facilitate resolution, the ACCC did not press the section 46 claim. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/visa-ordered-to-pay-18-million-penalty-for-anti-competitive-conduct-following-accc-action" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Wesfarmers misreading review of competition law': Durie</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:18:54 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Durie had an item in the Austrlaian Wednesday on cabinet's decision to defer consideration of misuse of market power reforms. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/wesfarmers-misreading-review-of-competition-law/story-e6frg9io-1227508321878" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Wesfarmers misreading review of competition law' (The Australian Business Review, 2 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Competition key to restoring Australia's productivity': Sims</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:18:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the Infrastructure Partnerships Australia Conference in Sydney today, pressing the case for implementation of key Harper Review reforms: see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/competition-key-to-restoring-australia%E2%80%99s-productivity" target="_blank">Sims, 'Competition key to restoring Australia's productivity' (Infrastructure Partnerships Australia Conference, Sydney, 4 September 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/infrastructure-reforms-can-help-restore-productivity" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Infrastructure reforms can help restore productivity' (ACCC media release, 4 September 2015)</a>. For media on this see, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/accc-head-rod-sims-wants-user-fees-put-back-into-managing-roads/story-fn9hlxnq-1227511684397?sv=da2f0ffe507f6e76c48ad7a3bca790b0" target="_blank">Annabel Hepworth, 'ACCC head Rod Sims wants user fees put back into managing roads' (Friday 4 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Part X of the CCA</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:18:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Paddy Crumlin has an opinion piece in today's Australian on the Hutchison ports dispute. In it, he notes failed attempts to repeal Part X of the Act following the recommendations of several successive inquiries (including Harper): see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/misguided-competition-policy-behind-hutchison-ports-dispute/story-e6frg6zo-1227511844313" target="_blank">Paddy Crumlin, 'Misguided competition policy behind Hutchison ports dispute' (The Australian, 4 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC draft final access determination for transmission services</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:18:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/transmission-services-facilities-access/domestic-transmission-capacity-service-final-access-determination-inquiry-2014/draft-decision-on-dtcs-fad" target="_blank">draft final access determination</a> for the declared domestic transmission capacity service. Submissions are invited until 2 October 2015. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-its-draft-decision-for-regulated-transmission-services" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC releases its draft decision for regulated transmission services' (ACCC media release, 4 September 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/transmission-services-facilities-access/domestic-transmission-capacity-service-final-access-determination-inquiry-2014" target="_blank">Domestic transmission capacity service final access determination inquiry page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper on the need for competition reform</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 21:17:52 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Patrick Durkin has an item in the AFR this afternoon on the need for competition reform: see <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/face-up-to-tough-reform-or-risk-recession-says-ian-haper-20150903-gje50m?&amp;utm_source=social&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=nc&amp;eid=socialn:twi-14omn0047-optim-nnn:nonpaid-27062014-social_traffic-all-organicpost-nnn-drive-o&amp;campaign_code=nocode&amp;promote_channel=social_twitter" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'Face up to 'tough' reform or risk recession, says Ian Harper' (The AFR, 3 September 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC delays decision on Shell's proposed acquisition of BG Group</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:17:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has delayed its decision on Shell's proposed acquisition of BG Group: see <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186999/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/accc-defers-decision-on-shells-takeover-of-bg/story-e6frg9df-1227510640136" target="_blank">Robb M Stewart, 'ACCC defers decision on Shell's takeover of BG' (The Australian Business Review, 3 September 2015).</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fels: Reform incapacity?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:35:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The AFR has an opinion piece by former ACCC Chairman, <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/tony-abbotts-harper-review-effects-test-rejection-shows-reform-incapacity-20150831-gjbhrt" target="_blank">Alan Fels: Alan Fels, 'Tony Abbott's Harper Review 'effects test' rejection shows reform incapacity' (AFR, 3 September 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Big business should "hang their head in business shame"'</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:40:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Eloise Keating has an item in Smart Company following cabinet's shelving of the effects test proposal: <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/legal/politics/48257-big-business-should-hang-their-head-in-business-shame-as-cabinet-crumbles-under-pressure-on-effects-test-peter-strong-says.html" target="_blank">Eloise Keating, 'Big business should “hang their head in business shame” as cabinet crumbles under pressure on effects test, Peter Strong says' (Smart Company, 3 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visa to settle with ACCC in abuse of power case</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 09:29:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Fairfax is reporting that the ACCC and Visa have reached a confidential settlement, to be brought before Justice Wigney on Thursday. The settlement stems from <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-commences-federal-court-proceedings-against-visa-inc" target="_blank">proceedings launched by the ACCC in February 2013</a> in which the ACCC alleged  Visa had contravened the misuse of market power and exclusive dealing provisions of the <a href="legislation/2010cca.html">CCA</a>. The hearing was due to commence on Monday 31 August, but was adjourned until Thursday. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/visa-faces-20m-fine-in-landmark-accc-case-20150901-gjcpw5.html" target="_blank">Patrick Durkin, 'Visa faces $20m fine in landmark ACCC case' (SMH, 1 September 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power proposal splits cabinet</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:29:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Australian is reporting that Minister Billson's proposals for an effects test for s 46 have been shelved (at least for now) following division in cabinet: see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/small-business-proposal-shelved-after-cabinet-division/story-fn59niix-1227508075981?sv=740a15b0994a2738f44552483fdfb75" target="_blank">David Crowe, 'Small business proposal shelved after cabinet division' (The Australian, 1 September 2015)</a>. See also, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/01/coalition-selling-out-small-business-to-big-end-of-town-say-lobbyists" target="_blank">'Coalition selling out small business to &quot;big end of town&quot;, says lobbyists' (The Guardian, 1 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power: Hockey v Billson</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:29:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Australian is reporting on the likely clash between Treasurer, Joe Hockey and Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, over proposed changes to the misuse of market power laws to be considered by cabinet today: <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/treasury/small-business-reform-to-test-resolve-over-joe-hockeys-job/story-fn59nsif-1227506796560?sv=11a947ba00307866ebefa09a7212d82e" target="_blank">David Crowe, 'Small business reform to test resolve over Joe Hockey’s job' (The Australian, 1 September 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/01/bruce-billson-says-big-business-could-be-appeased-by-tougher-competition-laws" target="_blank">Lenore Taylor, 'Bruce Billson embroiled in cabinet split over tougher competition laws' (The Guardian, 1 September 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson to take effects test to cabinet today</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:28:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, will put proposed changes to the misuse of market power test to the cabinet today. See<a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/cabinet-to-endorse-crackdown-on-big-business-power-20150831-gjbkf6" target="_blank"> Phillip Coorey, 'Cabinet split over crackdown on big business power' (AFR, 31 August 2015) (originally published as ' 'Cabinet to endorse crackdown on big business power')</a>. The Minister also has an opinion piece in the AFR discussing the issue: <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/harper-review-misuse-of-market-power-clause-would-energise-enterprise-20150831-gjblj5" target="_blank">Bruce Billson, 'Harper review misuse of market power clause would energise enterprise' (AFR, 31 August 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC applies for special leave in Flight Centre case</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:27:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has applied for special leave to appeal the <a href="cases/2013flightcentre.html">decision of the Full Federal Court on 31 July</a>. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-applies-for-special-leave-to-appeal-to-the-high-court-from-the-full-federal-court-flight-centre-judgment" target="_blank">See ACCC Press Release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Agricultural Commissioner</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:32:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Australian Farm Institute Executive Director Mick Keogh and former Regional Australia Institute CEO Su McCluskey (also a member of the Harper Panel) are said to be front runners for the ACCC's 'Agricultural Commissioner' role, recommended in July's <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014agriculture.html">AG White Paper</a>. See <a href="http://adf.farmonline.com.au/news/nationalrural/agribusiness/general-news/big-names-in-running-for-accc-ag-role/2741122.aspx" target="_blank">Colin Bettles, 'Big names in running for ACCC ag role' (Australian Dairyfarmer, 21 August 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qantas/China Eastern media</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:32:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>There's also plenty of media following the ACCC's decision to grant <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-qantas-china-eastern-coordination-agreement" target="_blank">conditional authorisation</a> for the Qantas/China Eastern coordination agreement. See, eg, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/aviation/accc-drops-opposition-to-qantaschina-eastern-alliance-20150820-gj4ckr.html" target="_blank">Matt O'Sullivan, 'ACCC drops opposition to Qantas-China Eastern alliance' (SMH, 21 August 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/business/breaking-news/accc-clears-qantas-china-eastern-deal/story-fnn9c0gx-1227492777444" target="_blank">Michael Roddan, 'ACCC clears Qantas-China Eastern Deal' (The Courier Mail, 21 August 2015)</a> and<a href="http://australianaviation.com.au/2015/08/accc-to-approve-qantas-china-eastern-alliance/" target="_blank"> 'ACCC to approve Qantas-China Eastern alliance' (Australian Aviation, 21 August 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on iiNet / TPG deal</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:31:52 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Plenty of media following the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-acquisition-of-iinet-by-tpg" title="ACCC iiNet" target="_blank">ACCC's decision</a> not to oppose TPG's proposed acquisition of iiNet. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/accc-gives-green-light-for-tpg-to-take-over-iinet/story-e6frgakx-1227491100470" target="_blank">Mitchell Bingemann, 'ACCC gives green light for TPG to take over iiNet' (The Australian, 20 August 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/tpg-iinet-approval-marks-the-end-of-consolidation/story-fn91vdzj-1227492174212" target="_blank">Mitchell Bingemann, 'TPG-iiNet approval marks the end of consolidation' (The Australian, 21 August 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.smartoffice.com.au/technology/6702QPVW-accc-green-light-for-tpg-iinet-merger-divides-oz-industry.aspx" target="_blank">'ACCC Green Light for TPG-iiNet Merger Divides Oz Industry' (Smartoffice, 21 August 2015)</a> and <a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/29305828/accc-ticks-off-1-6b-iinet-takeover/" target="_blank">Nick Sas, 'ACCC ticks off $1.6b iiNet takeover' (The West Australian, 20 August 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Qantas/China Eastern Airlines deal</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:44:06 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has granted conditional authorisation for the Qantas/China Eastern coordination agreement. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-qantas-china-eastern-coordination-agreement" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182892/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose acquisition of iiNet by TPG</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:43:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has indicated it will not oppose TPG's proposed acquisition of iiNet. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-acquisition-of-iinet-by-tpg" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188626/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. A public competition assessment will be released in due course.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OmniBlend fined for RPM</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:43:33 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court has ordered OmniBlend to pay a penalty of $17,500 for resale price maintenance in contravention of s 48 of the Act. Omniblend will also make payments towards the ACCC's costs and have given undertakings relating to compliance training. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-penalises-retailer-17%C2%A0500-for-resale-price-maintenance" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2015/871.html" target="_blank">decision at AustLII</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Review announced</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:43:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The Treasurer today announced the <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/intellectual-property/terms-of-reference" target="_blank">terms of reference</a> for a 12 month Productivity Commission inquiry into &quot;Intellectual Property Arrangements&quot;, including their effect on competition and consumer welfare and having regard to, amongst other things, 'the findings and recommendations of the <a href="reports/2015harper-report.html">Harper Competition Policy Review</a> in the context of the Australian Government's response, including recommendations related to parallel import restrictions in the Copyright Act 1968 and the parallel importation defence under the Trade Marks Act 1995'. View <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/intellectual-property" target="_blank">inquiry home page</a>. View <a href="http://jbh.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/073-2015/" target="_blank">joint media release from the Treasurer and Minister for Small Business</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims' speech to the Law Council on industrial relations and competition law</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 10:43:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Last night Rod Sims spoke to the Law Council of Australia, Business Law Section, discussing enforcement of competition law in relation to union behaviour. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/meeting-expectations-industrial-relations-as-a-case-study" target="_blank">View speech (Meeting expectations: Industrial relations as a case study')</a>. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-on-competition-law-enforcement-in-the-broad-industrial-relations-area" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC on competition law enforcement in the broad industrial relations area' (media release, 15 August 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2015/8/17/industrial-relations/accc-opens-its-eyes-australias-dirty-ir-secret" target="_blank">Ken Phillips, 'The ACCC opens its eyes to Australia's dirty IR secret' (Business Spectator, 17 August 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises Virgin/Delta Trans-Pacific alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:42:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The ACCC has re-authorised Virgin Australia and Delta Air Lines' coordination of operations between Australia and the US for a further five years. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-re-authorises-virgin-delta-trans-pacific-alliance" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Pfizer's proposed acquisition of Hospira</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:42:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has indicated it will not oppose Pfizer's proposed $US17 billion acquisition of Hospira.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-pfizer%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-hospira" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188437/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Staples' proposed acquisition of Office Depot</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:42:05 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has indicated it will not oppose Staples' proposed acquisition of Office Depot, which it considers is 'unlikely to substantially lessen competition in any office products market'.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-global-stationery-acquisition" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1188435/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">ACCC merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Former Woolies chairman calls for stronger competition laws</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:41:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Former Woolies Chairman, John Dahlsen, takes aim at Bunnings and calls for stronger competition laws - see Sue Mitchell, 'Former Woolworths chairman John Dahlsen attacks Bunnings over competition' (SHM, 12 August 2015) and <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/growth/48006-bunnings-is-like-a-vulture-small-business-backs-former-woolies-chief-on-how-hardware-giant-screws-competitors.html" target="_blank">Broede Carmody, 'Bunnings ‘is like a vulture’: Small business backs former Woolies chief on how hardware giant screws competitors' (Smart Company, 13 August 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Labor MP division on effects test ... continued</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:41:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Australian also has an item on MP division about the effects test - see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/labor-mps-divided-on-reining-in-big-business/story-fn59niix-1227479423652" target="_blank">Joe Kelly, 'Labor MPs divided on reining in big business' (The Australian, 12 August 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Labor MP division on effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:28:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The AFR reports today that a number of Labor MPs and senators are concerned about Labor's stance on the introduction of an effects test for s 46. It is also suggested that the Liberal cabinet is divided over the proposal. See further <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/labor-mps-divided-on-effects-test-20150811-giweba" target="_blank">Fleur Anderson, 'Labor MPs divided on effects test' (AFR, 11 August 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-recs.html#30">Harper recommendation on s 46</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access and Ports</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:28:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Gilbert + Tobin's latest client alert discusses the recent developments at the Port of Newcastle and Port of Melbourne- see <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/rv/ff00212a80c4a84b6c3c93c34d499f860773dc90" target="_blank">Gilbert + Tobin, 'A tale of two ports' (August 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bowen on the effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:28:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>This week's been all about the Harper proposal on the effects test for s 46. Today it's opposition treasury spokesman, Chris Bowen's, turn for an opinion piece in <em>The Australian</em>. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/tony-abbotts-effects-test-would-throttle-competition/story-e6frg9if-1227473337673" target="_blank">Chris Bowen, 'Tony Abbott’s effects test would throttle competition' (The Australian, 7 August 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on competition again</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:20:48 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>John Durie's in form this week, punching out another piece on the competition reforms - see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/small-business-minister-bruce-billson-reverts-to-form/story-e6frg9io-1227471654743" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Small Business Minister Bruce Billson reverts to form' (The Australian, 6 August 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson on misuse of market power</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:20:33 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Following yesterday's Cabinet meeting yesterday, Small Business minister, Bruce Billson, issued a media release focussing on misuse of market power laws. In it, he clearly expresses his view that the current law on misuse of market power has failed and requires re-framing in accordance with the Harper recommendations. See <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/072-2015/" target="_blank">The Hon Bruce Billson MP, 'Statement on making our misuse of market power laws workable, more predictable and more effective' ]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims opens ACCC/AER Regulatory Conference</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:00:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, opened the ACCC/AER Regulatory Conference today. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/opening-address-accc-aer-regulatory-conference" target="_blank">View speech</a>. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/regulatory-conference-focused-on-better-outcomes-and-reduced-burden" target="_blank">ACCC media release regarding the conference</a>, which will cover a variety of issues, including the trade-off between regulatory flexibility and certainty, net neutrality and extending competition law to government activity in trade or commerce.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Durie on competition reform</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:20 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>John Durie also has an item in today's Australian on competition reform (which includes the phrase 'loony-tune amendment' - not to be missed): <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/the-real-threat-to-competition-reform/story-e6frg9io-1227471013400?login=1" target="_blank">John Durie, 'The real threat to competition reform' (The Australian, 5 August 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the effects test</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Terry McCrann has an item in today's Herald Sun setting out his views on the proposed effects test (the item features not less than eight references to 'Kool-Aid' and, it appears, suggests wiping out any competition prohibitions that do not require proof of unlawful intent (because the 'absolute foundation of our legal system' is that 'intent' and not 'outcome' determines legality (so we'd also wipe out misleading conduct prohibitions as well and plenty of other civil prohibitions on this basis ...). McCrann also seems to suggest that the proposed change to an effects test would involve defining 'non anticompetitive' behaviour (?!) as 'small business <em>not </em>being hurt by the actions of a big company' - a criticism which, it seems to me, is much more appropriately leveled at the current and not the proposed provision ... ) - See <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/terry-mccrann/bruce-fails-his-big-effects-test/story-fni0d8gi-1227471720618" target="_blank">Terry McCrann, 'Bruce fails his big effects test' (Herald Sun, 5 August 2015)</a> (or just <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/the-real-threat-to-competition-reform/story-e6frg9io-1227471013400?login=1" target="_blank">read John Durie's instead</a>)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baxt on s 46</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:59:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Former Chairman of the competition watchdog, Prof Box Baxt, has warned introduction of effects test in s 46 is unlikely to do much to help retailers and small business, describing the ACCC's record in proving substantial lessening of competition as 'woeful'. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/former-watchdog-chief-doubts-change-to-market-power/story-e6frg6n6-1227470135614" target="_blank">Richard Gluyas,'
Former watchdog chief doubts change to market power' (The Australian, 5 August 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cabinet discusses competition reform</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:58:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Federal Cabinet met in Adelaide today to discuss, amongst other things, the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-recs.html">56 Harper Review recommendations</a>. The AFR reports that Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, was given the green light to keep developing the proposal to introduce an effects test into s 46 of the Act. <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/bruce-billson-strikes-back-at-bca-over-effects-test-backlash-20150804-gir6va?stb=twt">Phillip Coorey, 'Bruce Billson strikes back at BCA over effects test backlash' (AFR, 4 August 2015)</a>. Also, in response to Craig Emerson's opinion piece in the AFR Monday, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has an opinion piece in the AFR, claiming the proposed changes to s 46 will help boost competition: <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columns/change-to-law-will-boost-competition-20150804-gir9jr?stb=twt" target="_blank">Rod Sims, 'Why the change to Harper Competition Review law will help boost competition' (AFR, 4 August 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cabinet to discuss competition changes today</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:58:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Federal Cabinet is meeting in Adelaide today and is expected to discuss proposed changes following the Harper Report, including the recommendation for the introduction of an effects test for misuse of market power. A couple of items in yesterday's AFR focus on the effects test proposal: see<a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/prime-minister-takes-on-big-business-retailers-over-tougher-competition-law-20150803-giqf2o?stb=twt" target="_blank"> Phillip Coorey and Jacob Greber, 'Prime Minister takes on big business, retailers over tougher competition law' (AFR, 3 August 2015)</a> and an opinion piece from former competition minister, <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columns/the-coalition-gives-in-to-vested-interests-competition-policy-20150803-giqem0?stb=twt" target="_blank">Craig Emerson: 'The Coalition gives in to vested interests competition policy' (AFR, 3 August 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on Flight Centre and ANZ</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:19:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of media on the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre</a> and <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013anz.html">ANZ</a> appeal decisions. </p>
<p>A couple of standouts - video interview with John Durie discussing the outcomes (<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2015/7/31/markets/accc-setbacks-could-set-significant-precedent" target="_blank">John Durie and Eric George, 'ACCC setbacks could set a significant precedent' (Business Spectator, 31 July 2015)</a>) and an item this morning from Jamie Freed (<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-loss-in-flight-centre-anz-case-clarifies-pricefixing-rules-20150731-gioygs.html" target="_blank">Jamie Freed, 'ACCC loss in Flight Centre, ANZ case clarifies price-fixing rules' (SMH, 3 August 2015)</a> (also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/legal/accc-loss-in-flight-centre-anz-case-clarifies-pricefixing-rules-20150731-gioygs" target="_blank">published in AFR here</a>)). </p>
<p>Also some firm commentary available; see, for example, commentary from <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/rv/ff00210050ede39c797c244898438a597ba03aa9" target="_blank">Gilbert+Tobin</a> and <a href="http://www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/federal-court-allows-flight-centre-appeal-accc-20150731" target="_blank">King &amp; Wood Mallesons.</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reasons for judgment in Flight Centre appeal now published</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:32:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Federal Court has published its reasons for judgment in <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2015/2015fcafc0104" target="_blank">Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2015] FCAFC 104</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reasons for judgment in ANZ appeal now published</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:48:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Federal Court has published its decision in <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2015/2015fcafc0103" target="_blank">Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2015] FCAFC 103</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases statements on Flight Centre and ANZ appeals</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:13:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued media releases in relation to its losses in two Federal Court appeal cases today. See<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-unsuccessful-in-appeal-from-judgment-dismissing-price-fixing-allegations-against-anz" target="_blank"><em> ACCC unsuccessful in appeal from judgment dismissing price fixing allegations against ANZ</em></a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-unsuccessful-in-appeal-by-flight-centre" target="_blank"><em>ACCC unsuccessful in appeal by Flight Centre</em></a>. In relation to both th ACCC has indicated it will 'carefully consider' the judgments.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC loses ANZ appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:05:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has been unsuccessful in its appeal against the decision of Justice Dowsett in <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013anz.html">ACCC v ANZ Ltd
             [2013] FCA 1206</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flight Centre wins price-fixing appeal</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:40:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Flight Centre has won its appeal against <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">Justice Logan's 2013 decision</a> and the ACCC ordered to pay costs. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/flight-centre-wins-price-fixing-appeal-against-accc/story-e6frg906-1227464432845" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Flight Centre wins price-fixing appeal against ACCC' (The Australian, 31 July 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on allegations of cartel conduct in Canberra construction industry</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:50:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has noted it is 'aware of serious allegations ... concerning alleged cartel conduct in the construction industry in Canberra, particularly concreting and scaffolding' and has urged anyone with information to contact the ACCC's cartel immunity hotline. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/alleged-cartel-conduct-in-the-canberra-construction-industry" target="_blank">ACCC media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flight Centre decision expected tomorrow</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:50:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The decision in the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre appeal</a> is expected tomorrow. See, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/full-court-set-to-rule-on-flight-centre/story-e6frg9io-1227459935390" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Full Court set to rule on Flight Centre' (The Australian, 28 July 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proposed remedies for China Eastern/Qantas proposed JV</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:50:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>Jamie Freed has an item in the SMH today, noting remedies offered by China Eastern to ease ACCC concerns over its proposed JV with Qantas have been 'revealed to be seasonal'. See, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/aviation/china-easterns-proposed-accc-remedies-for-qantas-jv-revealed-to-be-seasonal-20150728-gilxjq.html" target="_blank">Jamie Freed, 'China Eastern's proposed ACCC remedies for Qantas JV revealed to be seasonal' (SMH, 29 July 2015)</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182892/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">ACCC authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commentary on Foxtel-Ten deal</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:49:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of commentary surrounding Foxtel's proposal to acquire up to 15% of Ten Network Holdings. See, for example, <a href="https://theconversation.com/sport-the-crunch-point-for-regulator-in-foxtel-ten-deal-45238" target="_blank">Joe Dimasi, 'Sport the crunch point for regulator in Foxtel-Ten deal' (The Conversation, 28 July 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/brand/murdochs-on-notice-over-foxtel-grab-for-ten-20150727-gii9by" target="_blank">Dominic White, 'Murdochs on notice over Foxtel grab for Ten' (AFR, 27 July 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-28/fairfax-boss-warns-foxtel-ten-play-will-entrench-murdoch/6654432" target="_blank">Elysse Morgan, 'Fairfax boss warns Foxtel's Ten play will entrench Murdoch dominance' (ABC News, 28 July 2015)</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187261/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a> (provisional date for the ACCC's announcement is 10 September)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commentary on Pfizer litigation</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:49:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Suiyi Zhang has a comment on <a href="cases/2015pfizer.html">Justice Flick's Pfizer decision</a> earlier this year. See <a href="http://chillingcompetition.com/2015/07/15/australias-turn-at-antitrust-pharmaceutical-litigation-has-so-far-yielded-interesting-results-by-suiyi-zhang/" target="_blank">Suiqi Zhang, 'Australia’s turn at antitrust pharmaceutical litigation has so far yielded interesting results' (Chillin' Competition blog, 15 July 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telstra competitors demand Communications Dept withdraw submission to ACCC</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:49:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It has been reported that the Competitive Carriers Coalition has demanded the Dept of Communications withdraw a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Department of Communications submission to ACCC on FLS FAD 17-7-15.pdf" target="_blank">submission to the ACCC</a> that backs Telstra's efforts to increase the regulated price it charges for access to its fixed copper network. See Mitchell Bingemann, 'Telcos slam department's Telstra defence' (The Australian, 24 July 2015, page 21 (or <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/telstra-telcos-criticise-departments-pro-telstra-submission/story-fn91v9q3-1227454562585" target="_blank">online version</a>)), <a href="http://delimiter.com.au/2015/07/24/extraordinary-telcos-slam-turnbulls-dept-for-backing-telstra-over-consumers/" target="_blank">Renai LeMay, '&quot;Extraordinary&quot;: Telcos slam Turnbull's Dept for backing Telstra over consumers' (Delimiter, 24 July 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/406969,telco-rivals-slam-govt-intervention-in-telstra-price-decision.aspx" target="_blank">Juha Saarinen, 'Telco rivals slam govt intervention in Telstra price decision' (itnews, 23 July 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Optus%20submission%20in%20response%20to%20Department%20of%20Communications%20submission%20-%20July%202015.pdf" target="_blank">Optus submission in response to Department of Communications submission</a>, received and released today.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to approve revised NBN/Optus arrangements</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:49:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC is proposing to authorise provisions within revised agreements between NBN Co and Optus involving &quot;progressive migration of Optus' HTC subscribers to the new multi-technology NBN ...'. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184734/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184734/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft decision</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-approve-revised-nbn-arrangements-with-optus" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC's Jill Walker appointed to NZCC</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:48:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Current ACCC Commissioner, Dr Jill walker, has been appointed to the New Zealand Commerce Commission for a five year term. The term will commence on 1 December; however, Dr Walker will continue to serve as an ACCC Commissioner until April 2016. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-commissioner-dr-jill-walker-appointed-to-the-nzcc" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise credit reporting system</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:48:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'proposes to grant authorisation for five years to the Australian Retail Credit Association Ltd (ARCA) in relation to principles for exchanging comprehensive consumer credit data between signatory credit reporting bodies and lenders'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-system-to-facilitate-comprehensive-credit-reporting" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D15+104688.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1187965&amp;trimFileName=D15+104688.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184971/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles and Supabarn - plenty of chatter</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:47:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There has been some chatter about Coles' proposed acquisition of nine Supabarn supermarkets over the last few days. Fairfax produced an editorial on the issue yesterday (<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/comment/ct-editorial/coles-purchase-of-supabarn-faces-competition-test-by-accc-20150715-giciub.html" target="_blank">'Coles' purchase of Supabarn faces competition test by ACCC' (The Canberra Times, 15 July 2015)</a>) and, surprisingly enough, Master Grocers Australia has called for the acquisition to be blocked (<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-15/sale-of-supabarn-to-coles-should-be-blocked-by-accc-mga-says/6621414" target="_blank">'Supabarn to Coles should be blocked by ACCC, Master Grocers Australia says' (666 ABC Canberra, 15 July 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/independent-supermarkets-object-to-coles-buying-supabarn-chain-20150714-gib9na.html" target="_blank">John Thistleton, 'Independent supermarkets object to Coles buying Supabarn chain' (SMH, 14 July 2015)</a>). It's such a hot topic the ACCC has even produced a <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/update/q-a-coles-proposed-acquisition-of-supabarn-supermarkets" target="_blank">Q&amp;A on the proposed acquisition</a>. The ACCC commenced an informal review on 22 June, with <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+6160.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1187686&amp;trimFileName=MER15+6160.pdf" target="_blank">market inquiry letters</a> sent on 25 June. Interested parties <a href="mailto:Coles-Supabarn-Mergers@accc.gov.au">can make submissions</a> until 20 July 2015. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187175/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sea Swift's proposed acquisition of Toll Marine Logistics heading to the Tribunal</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:47:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Toll Marine Logistics looks set to take their proposed deal with Sea Swift to the Australian Competition Tribunal after yesterday's announcement by the ACCC's that it would oppose the deal. See, eg, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/japan-post-to-appeal-accc-rejection-of-sea-swift-merger-deal/story-e6frg9io-1227435888840" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Japan Post to appeal ACCC rejection of Sea Swift merger deal' (The Australian, 10 July 2015)</a> and Elliana <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-09/consumer-watchdog-against-sale-of-toll-freight-assets-to-rival/6606766" target="_blank">Lawford, 'Toll Group to appeal to ACCC's decision to oppose NT freight assets sale to rival Sea Swift' (ABC News, 9 July 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes Sea Swift's proposed acquisition of Toll Marine Logistics</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:47:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has 'decided to oppose the proposed acquisition by Sea Swift Pty Ltd of the Northern Territory and far north Queensland marine freight business of Toll Marine Logistics Australia ... because it would be likely to substantially lessen competition'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-opposes-sea-swift-pty-ltd%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-toll-marine-logistics" target="_blank">media release</a>.  View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187800/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Qantas and American Airlines</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:47:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has granted interim authorisation to Qantas ... and American Airlines so they can introduce additional joint services between Australia and the US under an expansion of their alliance.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-qantas-and-american-airlines" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187050/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson speech to CEDA available</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 10:46:52 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson MP's, speech to CEDA on Wednesday is now available.  On competition laws, Billson discusses (or at least mentions) s 46, merger clearance and authorisation, extension of the Act to a broader range of government activity and simplifying cartel conduct. <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/speech/003-2015/" target="_blank">View transcript</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles proposed acquisition of nine Supabarn supermarkets</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:46:33 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has invited submissions on the review of Coles' proposed acquisition of Supabarn supermarkets. See, <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/q-a-coles-proposed-acquisition-of-supabarn-supermarkets" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Q&amp;A: Coles proposed acquisition of Supabarn supermarkets'</a>. See also <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187175/" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed lease acquisition by Coles, subject to divestiture</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 10:46:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Coles Supermarkets Australia of a lease to operate a supermarket at Lakelands, Western Australia, after accepting a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+6466.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1187634&amp;trimFileName=MER15+6466.pdf" target="_blank">court-enforceable undertaking</a> [which] requires Coles to divest its freehold interest in a nearby development at Singleton, WA to a purchaser approved by the ACCC within a specified period.'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-requires-coles-to-divest-supermarket-development-site-to-secure-approval-for-new-supermarket-at-lakelands-wa" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187615/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government's Harper response delayed until September (at least)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:45:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, spoke at CEDA today. He indicated (again) that he backs the proposed changes to s 46, but the Government response will be delayed until <em>at least </em>September. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/economics/harper-competition-review-response-delayed/story-e6frg926-1227423705596" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Harper competition review response delayed' (The Australian, 1 July 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper consultation submissions available</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:45:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Treasury has now published all non-confidential submissions made in response to its consultation on the Harper Review <a href="reports/2015harper-report.html">Final Report</a>. Treasury received <span id="content_1_lblTotalNoOfSubmissions">140</span> <span id="content_1_lblSubmissionText">submissions</span> in response to this consultation. <span id="content_1_lblNoOfConfidentials">Of these submissions, 8 were confidential.</span> <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Competition-Policy-Review-Final-Report/Submissions" target="_blank">View submissions</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper under wraps</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:42:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In today's Australian John Durie notes that Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson MP, will not be giving the government's response to the Harper Review today as cabinet is yet to consider his recommendations. See John Durie, 'Harper Still Under Wraps' (The Australian, 1 July 2015, page 28). Small Business Minister Billson is <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/events/eventdetails/2015/7/v150701?EventCode=V150701" target="_blank">speaking at CEDA today</a> on Competition Policy Reform, together with Prof Allan Fels.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No cartel fines in Australia for 2015</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:42:34 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian has an item by Leo Shanahan this morning highlighting the disparity in cartel fines between Australia and other jurisdictions in the year to date. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/accc-fails-to-impose-fine-for-cartel-conduct/story-fn91wd6x-1227420737002" target="_blank">Leo Shanahan, 'ACCC fails to impose fine for cartel conduct' (The Australian, 30 June 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts Cabcharge undertaking</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:42:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Cabcharge Australia Limited (Cabcharge) under which rival payment processors (third parties) will be able to process Cabcharge cards on their own in-taxi payment terminals'.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-accepts-undertaking-from-cabcharge-to-allow-competitors-to-process-its-cards-0" target="_blank">press release</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187316" target="_blank">undertaking</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gilbert + Tobin Competition Review 2015</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:41:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Gilbert + Tobin has released its <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/rv/ff0020333f4200c80d2ecfb428429fef403bff26" target="_blank">2015 Gilbert + Tobin Competition Review</a>, featuring Harper Review discussion (including interview with Michael O'Bryan QC), enforcement trends, mergers and acquisitions and plenty more. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court grants special leave in agreed penalties case</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:41:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/HCATrans/2015/149.html" target="_blank">High Court had granted the Commonwealth of Australia special leave</a> to appeal the decision in<em> <a href="cases/2015cfmeu.html">Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union</a></em><a href="cases/2015cfmeu.html"> [2015] FCAFC 59 (1 May 2015</a>), in which the Full Federal Court concluded that they should not have any regard to the figures agreed by the parties in relation to penalties. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises magazine distribution pilot program</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:41:05 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has authorised the Association of Magazine Publishers of Australia to run a pilot magazine distribution program over 3-6 months with the 40 newsagents that have agreed to participate' which 'will test the effectiveness of a proposed approach to address longstanding problems with the oversupply of magazines to newsagents. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-magazine-distribution-pilot-program" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1183386/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose JV between Patrick's and Australian Container Freight Services</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:40:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed Joint Venture between Patrick Container Ports Pty Ltd and Australian Container Freight Service Pty Ltd, finding that the provisions of the JV relating to the acquisition of shares or assets were unlikely to substantially lessen competition. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-patrick%E2%80%99s-proposed-joint-venture-with-acfs" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187255/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harris: Harper reforms key to lift the economy</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:39:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Productivity Commission Chairman, Peter Harris, has urged the government to take the recommendations of the Harper Review seriously, noting competition reform was needed for productivity growth. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/economics/harper-reforms-key-to-lift-economy-pc-boss-peter-harris/story-e6frg926-1227411802399" target="_blank">David Uren, 'Harper reforms key to lift economy: PC boss Peter Harris' (The Australian, 24 June 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to review Coles' proposed takeover of Supabarn stores</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:38:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>The ACCC will review the proposed acquisition by Coles of nine Supabarn stores. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-review-coles%E2%80%99-proposed-acquisition-of-supabarn-supermarkets" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1187175/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/accc-to-review-coles-supabarn-buy/story-e6frg90f-1227405928141" target="_blank">Michael Roddan, 'ACCC to review Coles' Supabarn buy' (The Australian, 19 June 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2015/06/19/watchdog-review-supabarn-takeover" target="_blank">AAP, 'Watchdog to review Supabarn takeover' (SBS, 19 June 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on ACCC Toll investigation</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:42:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>There is plenty of media relating to the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concludes-investigation-into-alleged-anti-competitive-conduct-by-toll" target="_blank">ACCC's announcement yesterday</a> that it did not consider that the alleged conduct contravened the CCA. See, for example: <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/infrastructure/roads/secret-deals-between-toll-holdings-and-the-twu-did-not-breach-competition-laws-says-accc-20150616-ghp085" target="_blank">Ewin Hannan, 'Secret deals between Toll Holdings and the TWU did not breach competition laws, says ACCC' (AFR, 16 June 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/old-laws-dont-work-in-the-new-era-of-industrial-relations/story-fnp85ntp-1227401746510" target="_blank">Robert Gottliebsen, 'Old laws don’t work in the new era of industrial relations' (Business Spectator, 17 June 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/accc-clears-toll-twu-agreement/story-fn3dxiwe-1227400151384" target="_blank">Peter Trute, 'Union calls for end to commission &quot;attack&quot;' (The Australian, 16 June 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.fullyloaded.com.au/industry-news/1506/accc-gives-toll-and-twu-the-all-clear/" target="_blank">'ACCC gives Toll and TWU the all clear on agreements' (ATN, 16 June 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC concludes investigation into Toll - concludes no contravention of the CCA</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:35:12 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has concluded its investigation into alleged anti-competitive agreements between Toll Holdings Ltd and the Transport Workers Union of Australia and has concluded that the alleged conduct does not contravene the provisions of the CCA. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concludes-investigation-into-alleged-anti-competitive-conduct-by-toll" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC delays decision on Sea Swift's acquisition of Toll Marine Logistics at request of parties</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:34:53 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has indicated that although it was 'ready to make and announce a decision in this matter yesterday' it has delayed its decision in relation to Sea Swift's proposed acquisition at the request of the parties 'so that they could make submissions about changes to the transaction and a new proposed undertaking that will attempt to address [the ACCC's] preliminary competition concerns'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-decision-on-sea-swift%E2%80%99s-acquisition-of-toll-marine-logistics-nt-fnq-delayed-at-the-merger-parties%E2%80%99-request" target="_blank">media release</a>. See merger <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1183062/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases statement of issues on TPG's proposed acquisition of iiNet</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:34:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+5452.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1187028&amp;trimFileName=MER15+5452.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining the ACCC's preliminary views on the proposed acquisition of iiNet by TPG. A final decision is now expected on 20 August, with submissions on the statement of issues due by 2 July. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-proposed-acquisition-of-iinet-by-tpg" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185185/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise joint procurement for waste services by NSW and Victorian councils</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:34:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued draft determinations proposing to authorise: </p>
           <ul>
             <li>various councils in <strong>Victoria</strong> to have the Metropolitan Waste and Resource Recovery Group act on their behalf to jointly procure services relating to receiving and processing recyclable waste (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-authorise-joint-procurement-for-waste-services-by-victorian-councils" target="_blank">press release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185829/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>); and</li>
             <li>various councils in New South Wales to jointly procure organic waste collection and processing services (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-authorise-joint-procurement-for-waste-services-by-nsw-councils" target="_blank">press release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185314/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>)</li>
           </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SOI on Ramsay's proposed acquisition of Wollongong Day Surgery</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:33:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+5453.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1187033&amp;trimFileName=MER15+5453.pdf" target="_blank"> Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition by Health Care Corporation (Ramsay) of Wollongong Day Surgery, noting that the ACCC is 'concerned that the proposed acquisition is likely to substantially lessen competition in the supply of day surgery services to private health funds and the Department of Veteran Affairs'. Proposed date for final decision is now 27 August. Submissions on SOI due by 2 July. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-ramsay%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-wollongong-day-surgery" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185232/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues final determination on NBN Co's LTRCM</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:33:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued its final determination on NBN Co's Long Term Revenue Constraint Methodology fro the 2013-2014 financial year. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-final-determination-on-nbn-co%E2%80%99s-ltrcm" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to rule on TPG's proposed acquisition of iiNet</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:33:20 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC is expected to announce a decision on TPG's proposed acquisition of iiNet tomorrow. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-set-to-rule-on-tpgs-bid-for-rival-iinet/story-e6frg8zx-1227387898471" target="_blank">John Durie, 'ACCC set to rule on TPG’s bid for rival iiNet' (The Australian, 8 June 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Submissions to Treasury on Harper Review Final Report</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:04:33 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-consult.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Submissions to Treasury on the Harper Review Final Report were due last Tuesday but have yet to appear on the <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Competition-Policy-Review-Final-Report" target="_blank">Treasury Consultation website</a>. A number of organisations have posted their submissions on their own sites, including the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Letter and Competition Policy Review Submission to Treasury.pdf" target="_blank">ACCC</a>, <a href="http://www.acci.asn.au/Research-and-Publications/Media-Centre/Media-Releases-and-Transcripts/ACCI-supports-recommendations--for-competition-pol" target="_blank">ACCI</a>, <a href="http://consumeraction.org.au/competition-policy-review-final-report/" target="_blank">Consumer Action Law Centre</a>, <a href="http://www.fare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/FARE-Submission-Competition-Policy-Final-Report.pdf" target="_blank">FARE</a> and the <a href="http://www.insurancecouncil.com.au/assets/submission/2015/May 2015/2015_05_22_General Manager_Competition Policy Recommendations.pdf" target="_blank">Insurance Council of Australia</a>. A full list of the submissions I've found so far can by found on my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-consult.html">consultation sub-page</a> - more will be added as I find them. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise Virgin/Delta Trans-Pacific Alliance</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:04:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC proposes to re-authorise Virgin/Delta Trans-Pacific Alliance for a period of five years. It has <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D15+76783.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1186878&amp;trimFileName=D15+76783.pdf" target="_blank">granted interim authorisation</a> which will take effect from the date of expiry of the existing authorisation. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-virgin-delta-trans-pacific-alliance" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184018/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. See also <a href="http://australianaviation.com.au/2015/06/accc-green-lights-extension-of-virgin-australia-delta-trans-pacific-alliance/" target="_blank">'ACCC green lights extension of Virgin Australia-Delta trans-Pacific alliance' (Australian Aviation, 4 June 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases issues paper for the East Coast Gas Inquiry</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:04:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released an<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/energy/east-coast-gas-inquiry-2015/issues-paper" target="_blank"> issues paper for the East Coast Gas Inquiry</a>. Submissions are due by 2 July 2015. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-issues-paper-for-the-east-coast-gas-inquiry" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Craft beer and exclusive contracts</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:03:44 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ABC has a story on craft beer and concerns from craft brewers about the exclusive contracts between pubs and major breweries. However, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, cautioned of the difference between 'exclusionary conduct that could lessen competition' and the 'proper working of the market'. Sims indicated that the ACCC's main concern is 'truth in advertising'. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/blueprintforliving/craft-beer-industry-concerns-come-to-a-head/6512740" target="_blank">Jeremy Story Carter, 'Brewers thirsty for change as craft concerns come to a head' (ABC Radio National, 2 June 2015)</a>. See also media from earlier this year - eg, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/beer-battle-priority-as-accc-puts-heat-on-lion-carlton--united-over-beer-tap-deals-20150216-13fno0.html" target="_blank">Adele Ferguson, 'Beer battle 'priority' as ACCC puts heat on Lion, Carlton & United over beer tap deals' (SMH, 16 February 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Harper Submission</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:19:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC's submission on the Harper Review recommendations is now available online. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-lodges-submission-on-harper-review-recommendations" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Letter%20and%20Competition%20Policy%20Review%20Submission%20to%20Treasury.pdf" target="_blank">submission</a>. For media on the submission see, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/accc-opposes-harper-cartel-change/story-e6frg906-1227377956368" target="_blank">Michael Roddan, 'ACCC opposes Harper cartel change' (Business Spectator, 1 June 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/markets/action-on-cartels-open-to-abuse-says-regulator/story-e6frg916-1227378681368" target="_blank">Annabel Hepworth, 'Action on cartels open to abuse, says regulator' (The Australian, 2 June 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: Section 46: The Great Divide</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:19:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The speech delivered by ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, at Saturday's Competition Law Conference is now available online. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/chairman-addresses-the-great-divide-on-misuse-of-market-power" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/section-46-the-great-divide" target="_blank">speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Law Conference 2015</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 09:18:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Another great Competition Law Conference in Sydney today put together by <a href="experts/hodgekiss-chris.html">Chris Hodgekiss</a>. Paper and slides presented by <a href="experts/taylor-martyn.html">Dr Martyn Taylor</a> are available online: <a href="readingroom/2015/2015taylor-hightech.html">Martyn Taylor, 'Competition Law in High Technology Industries: Insights for Australia' (Competition Law Conference, Sydney, 30 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The hidden cost of the free</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 09:18:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Terrific seminar today by Michal Gal on the 'Hidden Costs of Free Goods' - based on a  paper authored by Michal and Daniel L Rubinfeld ' <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2529425" target="_blank">'The Hidden Costs of Free Goods: Implications for Antitrust Enforcement' (NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 14-44, January 2015)</a>. The seminar was the latest in the <a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/clen" target="_blank">Competition Law and Economics Network's</a> seminar series.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCI opposes proposal to axe role of ACCC small business commissioner</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 09:18:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR has an item today on the ACCI's submissions on the Harper Report - in particular its opposition to axing the role of small business commissioner in the ACCC and its support of proposed changes to 46. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/policy/dont-forget-small-business-or-put-competition-policy-reform-in-the-toohard-basket-says-acci-20150528-ghbjed" target="_blank">Nassim Khadem, 'Don't forget small business or put competition policy reform in the too-hard basket, says ACCI' (AFR, 28 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC alleges cartel conduct in the NSW Government's Mount Penny coal exploration licence tender process</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 09:18:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against eleven respondents alleging bid rigging involving mining exploration licences in the Bylong Valley. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-for-alleged-cartel-conduct-in-the-nsw-government%E2%80%99s-mount-penny-coal-exploration-licence-tender-process" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/accc-takes-action-against-obeid-family-interests/story-e6frg6nf-1227368177614" target="_blank">Leo Shanahan, 'ACCC takes action against Obeid family interests' (The Australian, 25 May 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/moses-obeid-paul-obeid-and-businessmen-accused-of-cartel-conduct-by--accc-over-bylong-valley-coal-licences-20150525-gh8vhw.html" target="_blank">Kate McClymont, 'Moses Obeid, Paul Obeid and businessmen accused of 'cartel conduct' by ACCC over Bylong Valley coal licences' (SMH, 25 May 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-25/accc-launches-cartel-proceedings-against-eddie/6495290" target="_blank">Michael Janda, 'ACCC launches cartel proceedings against Eddie Obeid's sons' (ABC, The World Today) (5 min audio)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/brand/chanticleer/obeids-cop-accc-cartel-allegations-over-mt-penny-coal-20150525-gh9aq8" target="_blank">Tony Boyd 'Obeids cop ACCC cartel allegations over Mt Penny coal' (AFR, 25 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues fifth water monitoring report</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 09:17:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has publicly released its<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-water-monitoring-report/accc-water-monitoring-report-2013-14" target="_blank"> fifth Water Monitoring Report</a> [which] details the impact of water market and charge reforms on irrigators and infrastructure operators in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB).'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/water-market-reforms-continue-to-deliver-benefits-to-irrigators" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Federation Centres' proposed acquisition of Notion Property Group</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 09:17:25 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has announced that it will not oppose Federation Centres’ proposed acquisition of Novion Property Group after accepting court-enforceable undertakings from the parties to divest one of their shopping centres in South East Melbourne.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-federation-centres’-proposed-acquisition-of-novion-property-group" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186570/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel: Iron ore inquiry could damage investment reputation</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 09:17:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, has told the ABC that a parliamentary inquiry into the iron ore industry could damage Australia's investment reputation: see <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-18/iron-ore-inquiry-could-damage-australia-investment-reputation/6477390" target="_blank">Peter Ryan, 'Iron ore inquiry could damage Australia's investment reputation: Samuel' (ABC news, 18 May 2015)</a>. See also Flavio <a href="http://theconversation.com/competition-the-wrong-test-for-iron-ore-inquiry-41814" target="_blank">Menezes, 'Competition the wrong test for iron ore inquiry' (The Conversation, 18 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC finds no evidence of cartel conduct by fuel retailers in Armidale</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 09:16:45 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has concluded an investigation into allegations of ant-competitive conduct be fuel retailers in Armidale, finding no evidence of cartel conduct. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concludes-investigation-into-armidale-fuel-prices" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and the budget</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 09:16:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/~/media/Treasury/Publications%20and%20Media/Publications/2015/PBS%202015/Downloads/PDF/03_ACCC.ashx" target="_blank">Treasury Portfolio budget statement on the ACCC</a> has been published following <a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/2015-16/index.htm" target="_blank">Tuesday night's budget</a>. It runs to 27 pages (pages 87-113 of the Treasury document). </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reports on Telstra's compliance with SSU</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 09:15:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking/telstras-structural-separation-undertaking-2013-14" target="_blank">ACCC annual report on Telstra's compliance with its Structural Separation Undertaking</a> was tabled in Parliament on Tuesday. While generally compliant, the report notes Telstra failed to meet its obligations on a number of occasions. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-reports-upon-telstra%E2%80%99s-compliance-with-its-structural-separation-undertaking" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/telstra-retail-had-better-adsl-tools-than-wholesale-accc/" target="_blank">Chris Duckett, 'Telstra Retail had better ADSL tools than Wholesale: ACCC' (ZDNet, 13 May 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.itwire.com/government-tech-news/technology-regulation/68008-telstra-breached-structural-separation-obligations-in-2014-accc" target="_blank">Stan Beer, 'Telstra breached Structural Separation obligations in 2014: ACCC' (IT Wire, 13 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agreed penalties</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 11:31:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Ayman Guirguis, Richard Filtcroft and Asa Lam at Corrs have a briefing on the recent Full Federal Court decision in CFMEU dealing with agreed penalties - <a href="http://www.corrs.com.au/publications/corrs-in-brief/where-to-now-for-agreed-civil-penalty-outcomes-following-the-cfmeu-and-barbaro-decisions/" target="_blank">'Where to now for Agreed Civil Penalty Outcomes following the CFMEU and Barbaro Decisions' (Corrs Chambers Westgarth, 'Corrs in Brief', 8 May 2015)</a>. For links to cases and additional commentary <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/hottopics/agreedpenalties.html">click here</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failing firms and mergers</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 19:37:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Michael Corrigan and Ian Reynolds at Clayton Utz have a news item on the ACCC's approach to failing firm claims in merger clearance applications, focussing on the <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186207/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">ACCC's recent decision</a> not to oppose VIP Steel Packaging's proposed acquisition of certain steel drum assets from National Can Industries. See <a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201505/06/when_will_the_accc_clear_a_failing_firm_transaction.page" target="_blank">Michael Corrigan and Ian Reynolds, 'When will the ACCC clear a 'failing firm' transaction?' (Clayton Utz, 6 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft ruling on network access</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 18:05:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/mobile-services/mobile-terminating-access-service-fad-inquiry-2014/draft-decision-on-primary-price-terms" target="_blank">draft decision</a> 'on the regulated price that mobile network operators charge each other and fixed-line network operators for receiving calls on their mobile network'. The decision also 'sets a regulated price that mobile network operators may charge for receiving SMS messages'. Final decision is expected to be released in July. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-draft-decision-on-mobile-call-and-sms-terminating-charges" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See Mobile <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/mobile-services/mobile-terminating-access-service-fad-inquiry-2014" target="_blank">terminating access service FAD inquiry 2014</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/mobiles/cheaper-mobile-calls-and-text-as-accc-moves-to-slash-wholesale-fees-20150506-ggv540.html" target="_blank">Esther Han, 'Cheaper mobile calls and text as ACCC moves to slash wholesale fees' (SMH, 6 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and secondary boycotts</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 18:05:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>AFR has an opinion piece on the ACCC's approach to secondary boycotts: <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/columnists/union-thuggery-is-beyond-acccs-comfort-zone-20150505-ggugt4" target="_blank">Stuart Wood 'Union thuggery is beyond ACCC's comfort zone' (AFR, 5 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>King and Samuel on misuse of market power - again</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 18:10:03 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Professors Stephen King and Graeme Samuel have an item in today's Conversation about the proposed changes to the misuse of market power provision: <a href="https://theconversation.com/competition-law-fix-could-seriously-harm-competition-41159" target="_blank">Stephen King and Graeme Samuel, 'Competition law fix could seriously harm competition' (The Conversation, 5 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Russell Miller on Harper proposals</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 18:12:20 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Russell Miller has an item in today's Conversation - <a href="https://theconversation.com/competition-debate-must-move-beyond-effects-test-battle-41030" target="_blank">'Competition Debate must move beyond effects test battle' (The Conversation, 1 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICN meeting concludes in Sydney</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 18:04:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.icn2015.com.au/" target="_blank">2015 ICN Annual Meeting</a> concluded in Sydney today.  The <a href="http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/" target="_blank">International Competition Network</a> comprises 130 competition agencies from 115 jurisdictions and the Meeting was attended by delegates from over 70 countries. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australia-wraps-up-key-competition-law-event" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 18:04:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The latest issue of <em><a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a></em> is now available. This time Alexandra Merrett and Rhonda Smith focus on the pros and cons of adopting principles adopted in other jurisdictions. They focus on differences in the US and European systems as well as approaches taken in NZ. View <a href="https://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_22_overseas_wisdom_01.pdf" target="_blank">Merrett and Smith, Here there be dragons: The pros &amp; cons of overseas adventures' (April 2015) 22(1) <em>The State of Competition</em></a> (PDF)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC closes investigation on Andrew Forrest's comments</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 18:04:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has closed its investigation into Andrew Forrest's comments calling for a cap on iron ore production and has decided against taking any further action. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concludes-assessment-of-fortescue-chairman%E2%80%99s-call-for-cap-on-iron-ore-production" target="_blank">ACCC, 'ACCC concludes assessment of Fortescue chairman’s call for cap on iron ore production
               (ACCC Media Release, 30 April 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/accc-forgives-forrests-controversial-iron-ore-cartel-call/story-e6frg9df-1227329119937" target="_blank">Andrew Burrell, 'ACCC forgive Forrest's controversial iron ore 'cartel' call' (The Australian, 1 May 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/mining/iron-ore/rio-tinto-tells-fortescue-billionaire-andrew-forrest-to-get-your-own-house-in-order-20150430-1mwscf" target="_blank">Amanda Saunders, 'Rio Tinto tells Fortescue billionaire Andrew Forrest to 'get your own house in order' (AFR, 1 May 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gilbert + Tobin release merger app</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:04:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Gilbert + Tobin have released a guide to the merger clearance process in Australia, available through their G+T Insights app (for <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/collect/click.aspx?u=jRYOrR8N39Qf1J8c8omNEayYSero7h01OCL7q6Y9hTxYyTE4mZ3hipl91tlLswrLqIvD6c5LqkZiuJP5x2dXbJNJ9ZkC6hV6&amp;rh=ff001efdb06f06d3700cc1d25340bebe6f8f6cca" target="_blank">Android</a> or <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/collect/click.aspx?u=jRYOrR8N39ST+TXU0idePcG9pULCl0XdUumhUzBSkmA+gMftT7xASlWXz6KF+F4rpDDjkTw4IJRdajpUqLCZpA==&amp;rh=ff001efdb06f06d3700cc1d25340bebe6f8f6cca" target="_blank">iOS</a>). It is also downloadable as <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/collect/click.aspx?u=pP0WeZbCfhsWbXienGVztXnJqijhvTCkwqyQmf1JLpV8poQVYGFWDJlm0+IiTWX9FYnugTWz6bA=&amp;rh=ff001efdb06f06d3700cc1d25340bebe6f8f6cca" target="_blank">PDF</a> or for viewing <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/collect/click.aspx?u=wEOp4F7+vmNLc+2jrRC+pjDGclJ75NsdNmmsmh0s3iDPS7cVuvHZkV03b+8gFvA7aL64K4LT1ArQnJHvBvxyXE0TzzHnKTeKo+iT1HCi06PNVhjbRhkU+SeqgYk8XL8T7clyZ9k3XTCFYjg8NSdka025gCsPpUm8YbUQ2NxA9I2I2yj4QJpnrVLDKqNeiSTolPERvVz66VwaCMyDCzfGAZqQA3yvFdOlYd3lZQ59REo=&amp;rh=ff001efdb06f06d3700cc1d25340bebe6f8f6cca" target="_blank">online</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues ACCCount for March quarter</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:03:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has published ACCCount for the March quarter 2015. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/acccount/acccount-1-january-to-31-march-2015">ACCCount 1 January to 31 March 2015</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australia and Japan sign cooperation agreement</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:03:39 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC and Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) signed an agreement at the International Competition Network meeting in Sydney. Amongst other things, the agreement will enable the JFTC to 'share confidential information without getting a waiver'. This builds on the <a href="http://www.jftc.go.jp/en/int_relations/agreements.files/JAEPA_BA.pdf" target="_blank">Agreement between Japan and Australia for an Economic Partnership</a> (Signed on 8 July 2014 and entered into force on 15 January 2015) See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australia-and-japan-to-increase-cooperation-on-competition-matters" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. The agreement is not yet available on the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/international-relations/treaties-agreements" target="_blank">ACCC's treaties and agreements page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose VIP Steel's proposed acquisition of certain assets from National Can Industries</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:03:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by VIP Steel Packaging Pty Ltd’s (VIP Steel) ... of certain assets used in the manufacture of large steel drums from National Can Industries Pty Ltd (NCI)', concluding that the proposed acquisition would be unlikely to substantially lessen competition'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-vip-steel%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-certain-large-steel-drum-assets-from-national-can-industries" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186207/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prof Frédéric Jenny's Baxt lecture now available (audio and PPT)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:23:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The audio, slides and some images from the Sixth Annual Baxt Lecture, delivered by <a href="http://www.essec.edu/faculty/frederic-jenny" target="_blank">Prof Frédéric Jenny, </a> are now available: '<a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/clen/activities-and-media/annual-baxt-lecture" target="_blank">The Institutional Design of Competition Authorities: International Debates and Trends</a>'.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper argues for ACCC split</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:23:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ian Harper spoke at yesterday's <a href="http://www.ibanet.org/Article/Detail.aspx?ArticleUid=cae2a6e9-a6bb-4174-87f8-e007a9e312bb" target="_blank">World Bank-IBA conference</a>, ahead of the ICN Meeting in Sydney. He spoke (amongst other things) about the proposals in the Harper Report to split the ACCC - in particular, to create the Australian Council for Competition and to give existing ACCC functions in relation to  energy, water and telecommunications to a separate agency. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-makes-case-to-split-the-accc-into-two-bodies/story-e6frg9io-1227325513102" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Harper makes case to split the ACCC into two bodies' (The Australian, 29 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Competition Network Annual Meeting begins in Sydney today</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:33:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Competition heavyweights from around the world are converging on Sydney for the  14th <a href="http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/" target="_blank">International Competition Network</a> annual meeting, this year hosted by the ACCC in Sydney. The meeting begins this evening with a welcome reception at the Sydney Opera House and then it's down to business from tomorrow until Friday afternoon. The ACCC was one of the founding 16 member agencies of the Network which now comprises over 100 competition agencies from almost as many jurisdictions. For details about the conference see the <a href="http://www.icn2015.com.au/" target="_blank">conference home page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICC launches SME toolkit and recommendations on pre-merger notification regimes in Sydney today</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:33:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ICC held its 7th Annual Roundtable on Competition Policy in Sydney today. Following a keynote speech by ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, the ICC launched the <a href="http://www.iccwbo.org/advocacy-codes-and-rules/areas-of-work/competition/why-complying-with-competition-law-is-good-for-business/" target="_blank">ICC SME Toolkit,</a> designed to improve SME antitrust compliance and later released <a href="http://www.iccwbo.org/advocacy-codes-and-rules/areas-of-work/competition/premerger-control-regimes/" target="_blank">ICC Recommendations on Pre-Merger Notification Regimes</a>. See <a href="http://www.iccwbo.org/News/Articles/2015/ICC-launches-two-antitrust-advocacy-tools-in-Sydney/" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rod Sims rejects claim effects test will hurt shoppers</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:32:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has (again) expressed his view that the introduction of the effects test for misuse of market power, as proposed in the Harper Report, is 'sensible' and in no way targeted at particular segments of the economy. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/accc-boss-rod-sims-rejects-supermarket-claims-effects-test-will-hurt-shoppers-20150427-1mubcl.html" target="_blank">Esther Han, 'ACCC boss Rod Sims rejects supermarket claims effects test will hurt shoppers' (SMH, 27 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supermarket Power Project launched</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:15:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>A new Australian Research Council (ARC) - funded project on Supermarket Power in Australia was launched today. Visit <a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/supermarkets" target="_blank">Supermarket Power Project website</a> for more details.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson hosts first Competition Policy Review consultation Roundtable</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:21:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson MP, hosted the first consultation Roundtable on the Harper Competition Policy Review today. View <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/037-2015/" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Medicines Australia code</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:15:06 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has re-authorised the Medicines Australia Code of Conduct for five years, subject to undertakings relating to public reporting. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-medicines-australia-code-subject-to-strengthening-individual-reporting" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179619/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prof Frédéric Jenny delivers Sixth Annual Baxt Lecture</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:14:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.essec.edu/faculty/frederic-jenny" target="_blank">Dr Frédéric Jenny</a> delivered the <a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/clen/activities-and-media/annual-baxt-lecture/flushcache/1/showdraft/1" target="_blank">Sixth Annual Baxt Lecture</a> in Melbourne today on the topic: 'The Institutional Design of Competition Authorities: International Debates and Trends'.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>April issue of ABLR</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:14:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The April issue of the <em>Australian Business Law Review</em> has also been published. The key contribution of interest for competition law is the article by <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2015/2015smith-duke-informationexchange.html">Rhonda Smith and Arlen Duke entitled: 'Information exchange, hub and spoke arrangements and collusion'</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Latest CCLJ out now</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:13:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The latest <em>Competition and Consumer Law Journal </em>has now been published and features three articles on parallel import restrictions:</p>
             <ul>
               <li>Edgar Lazeanu, Repealing the parallel importation restrictions for books:
               The case for an ‘Author Offset’ </li>
               <li>Susy Frankel, Chris Nixon, Megan
                 Richardson and John Yeabsley, 'Parallel importing — The New Zealand experience with
                 book publishing'</li>
               <li>Arlen Duke and
                 Matthew E Taylor, 'Parallel import restrictions: Core intellectual property rights
                 or unjustified restraints on trade?'</li>
             </ul>
             <p>It features a further two articles on statutory undertakings and financial advice reforms:</p>
             <ul>
               <li>Justice Alan Robertson, 'Statutory undertakings: Their history, use and utility and the perspective of the court'</li>
               <li>Gill North, 'The future of financial advice reforms: Will they achieve
their long term objectives?'</li>
             </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Harper Review and privatisation</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:38:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In a speech to  <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/events/eventdetails/2015/4/q150423?EventCode=Q150423" target="_blank">CEDA</a> today, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, discussed three key issues affecting competitiveness of Australian markets; section 46, concerted practices and privatisation. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/the-harper-review-and-privatisation" target="_blank">ACCC, 'The Harper Review and Privatisation' (ACCC Media Release, 23 April 2015)</a> (the full speech is not yet available on the ACC website, but the press release quotes heavily from the speech on all three issues)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims accuses supermarkets of confusing debate around s 46</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:15:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>At a speech to <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/events/eventdetails/2015/4/q150423?EventCode=Q150423" target="_blank">CEDA</a> today, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-raps-supermarkets-for-confused-debate/story-e6frg8zx-1227316004963" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'ACCC raps supermarkets for ‘confused’ debate' (The Australian, 23 April 2015</a> (speech not yet available on ACCC website)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims warns of gaps in cartel laws</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:15:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[     <p>At a speech to <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/events/eventdetails/2015/4/q150423?EventCode=Q150423" target="_blank">CEDA</a> today, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, warned of gaps in cartel laws. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/politics/acccs-rod-sims-warns-of-gaps-in-cartel-laws-20150422-1mqnb6?stb=twt" target="_blank">Mark Ludlow, 'ACCC's Rod Sims warns of 'gaps' in cartel laws' (AFR, 23 April 2015)</a> (speech not yet available on ACCC website)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ian Harper speeks on pharmacy restrictions</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:13:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>At a speech to <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/events/eventdetails/2015/4/q150423?EventCode=Q150423" target="_blank">CEDA</a> today, Prof Ian Harper focussed on pharmacy restrictions, claiming existing anti-competitive measures were not in the public interest: see <a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/business/harper-review-recommendations-on-competition-a-bitter-pill-for-pharmacies/story-fnihsps3-1227317738920" target="_blank">Glen Norris, 'Harper Review recommendations on competition a bitter pill for pharmacies' (Courier-Mail, 23 April 2015)</a>             </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose AAT's proposed acquisition of lease to operate auto terminal at Port of Fremantle</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:42:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC will not oppose AAT’s proposed acquisition of the lease to operate the automotive terminal at Port of Fremantle, subject to a s <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D15+52633.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1186086&amp;trimFileName=D15+52633.pdf" target="_blank">87 Undertaking</a> addressing the ACCC's vertical competition concerns.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-aat%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-the-lease-to-operate-the-automotive-terminal-at-port-of-fremantle" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1186062/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telstra slams ACCC access pricing rulings</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:28:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Telstra has described recent ACCC's rulings on access pricing as 'baffling' and 'strange'. See <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/breaking-news/accc-has-lost-the-plot-on-access-pricing-telstra/story-fnn9c0hb-1227312878119" target="_blank">Mitchell Bingemann, 'ACCC has lost the plot on access pricing: Telstra' (Herald Sun, 21 April 2015)</a> or <a href="Telstra slams ACCC price rulings in transition to NBN" target="_blank">Mitchell Bingemann, &quot;Telstra slams ACCC price rulings in transition to NBN&quot; (The Australian, 20 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review and cartel immunity</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:28:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Arnold Bloch Leibler partners, Zaven Mardirossian and Matthew Lees argue that the Harper Review missed an opportunity to tackle the ACCC's immunity policy for cartel conduct, disagreeing with the Panel's conclusion that the current regime provides an adequate level of certainty: See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-review-leaves-cartel-immunity-uncertain/story-e6frg9if-1227310877555" target="_blank">Zaven Mardrirossian and Matthew Lees, 'Harper Review leaves cartel immunity uncertain' (The Australian, 20 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC extends consultation period for proposed China Eastern/Qantas deal</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:28:12 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>On 16 April the ACCC <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D15+49806.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1185975&amp;trimFileName=D15+49806.pdf" target="_blank">extended the deadline</a> for consideration of the authorisation application until 31 August 2015; in accordance with<a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca90.html"> s 90(10A)</a> of the Act they are seeking agreement from the parties (requested by 21 April) for the extension. This follows a request by Qantas for additional time to provide its submission in response to the ACCC's draft determination. On On 24 March the ACCC released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182892/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to deny authorisation. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182892/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/pressure-grows-on-accc-to-drop-opposition-to-qantaschina-eastern-alliance-20150420-1mou0m.html" target="_blank">also Matt O'Sullivan, 'Pressure grows on ACCC to drop opposition to Qantas-China Eastern alliance' (SMH, 20 April 2015)</a> and <a href="http://australianaviation.com.au/2015/04/accc-extends-consultation-period-for-proposed-china-eastern-qantas-alliance/" target="_blank">'ACCC extends consultation period for proposed China Eastern-Qantas alliance' (Australian Aviation, 20 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC monitoring Staples Inc's proposed acquisition of Office Depot</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:27:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC is monitoring the proposed acquisition of Office Depot by Staples and will commence informal review following receipt of further information from the parties. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185977/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/scrutiny-on-us-office-supplies-merger/story-e6frg9io-1227311849933" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Scrutiny on US office supplies merger' (The Australian, 20 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allens &gt;&lt; Linklaters Competition Law Update</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:27:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The latest <a href="http://www.allens.com.au/pubs/comp/it17apr15.htm" target="_blank">'In Touch' Competition Law Update</a> from Allens &gt;&lt; Linklaters is now available.</p>
             <h3>17 April 2015 - Michael O'Bryan QC on the Harper Report</h3>
             <p>Harper Review panelist, Michael O'Bryan QC, discusses the Harper recommendations in today's Financial Review: see <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/legal/courts-business-up-to-the-challenge-harper-panellist--silk-20150416-1mkcp8" target="_blank">Katie Walsh, 'Courts, business up to the challenge: Harper panellist & silk' (AFR, 17 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael O'Bryan QC on the Harper Report</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:21:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Harper Review panelist, Michael O'Bryan QC, discusses the Harper recommendations in today's Financial Review: see <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/legal/courts-business-up-to-the-challenge-harper-panellist--silk-20150416-1mkcp8" target="_blank">Katie Walsh, 'Courts, business up to the challenge: Harper panellist & silk' (AFR, 17 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review video commentary from KWM</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:39:43 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a series of recent video's King &amp; Wood Mallesons partners discuss some key <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-report.html">Harper Review</a> proposals:</p>
             <ul>
               <li>Peta Stevenson and Lisa Huett, discuss the Harper Review's key enforcement recommendations: <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2015/04/powers-penalties-harper-reviews-key-enforcement-recommendations/" target="_blank">Matt Sherman, 'Powers and Penalties - The Harper Review's Key Enforcement Recommendations' (KWM, <em>In Competition</em>, 16 April 2015)</a></li>
               <li>Sharon Henrick and Caroline Coops discuss the Harper Committee's recommendations in relation to merger control: <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2015/04/clearing-way-improvements-australias-merger-control-process/" target="_blank">Martine Phillips, 'Clearing the way for Improvements to Australia's Merger Control Processes' (KWM, <em>In Competition, </em>16 April 2015)</a> </li>
               <li>Andrew Monotti and Wayne Leach discuss privatisation: <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2015/04/privatisation-hot-topic-public-conversation/" target="_blank">Susan Zhuang, 'Privatisation: A hot topic of public conversation' (KWM, <em>In Competition</em>, 13 April 2015)</a></li>
             </ul>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Role of the ACCC in Court Proceedings</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:39:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In King&amp;Wood Mallesons' latest <em>In Competition </em>blog post, partners Trish Henry and Stephen Ridgeway discuss the role of the ACCC in Court proceedings, noting increased litigation by the ACCC. See<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2015/04/current-trends-in-competition-law-litigation/" target="_blank"> Tamara Hunter, 'Current Trends in Competition Law Litigation' (<em>In Competition, </em>16 April 2015)</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on Google</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:39:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, following a lengthy investigation, the European Commission sent a <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-4781_en.htm" target="_blank">Statement of Objections to Google</a>. The SO set out the EC's preliminary view that Google has abused its dominant position in breach of Article 102 TFEU by favouring its own comparison shopping product in its search results. Yesterday, in an interview on ABC's 'The World Today', ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims,  indicated that they are monitoring what the EC is doing but are not planning their own investigation at this stage. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2015/s4217604.htm" target="_blank">Pat McGrath, 'ACCC lets EU do heavy lifting on Google competition investigation' (ABC, The World Today with Eleanor Hall, 16 April 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/case_details.cfm?proc_code=1_39740" target="_blank">EC Google Case page</a>. On the same day it issued the SO to Google in relation to it shopping search results, the <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-4782_en.htm" target="_blank">EC also opened a separate competition investigation</a> into Google's conduct with regard to the open-source Android operating system.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper speech to CEDA</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:38:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The speech given to CEDA by Competition Policy Review Chair, Prof Ian Harper, on Tuesday is now available online. <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/2015/04/14/speech20150414/" target="_blank">View speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC investigating allegations of misuse of market power in relation to Telstra's wholesale 4G services</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:20:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian reports that the ACCC is investigating claims Telstra is misusing its market power by 'refusing to wholesale its superfast 4G services to rival telcos': see <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-looks-into-telstras-4g-wholesale-delays/story-fn91v9q3-1227300811837" target="_blank">Mitchell Bingemann, 'Watchdog probes Telstra's 4G delays' (The Australian, 13 April 2015, page 17</a>. See also <a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/572485/accc-mulls-response-4g-wholesale-complaint/" target="_blank">Rohan Pearce, 'ACCC mulls response to Telstra 4G wholesale complaint' (Computerworld, 13 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No cross-subsidy of contestable services by Australia Post</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:04:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/assessing-cross-subsidy-in-australia-post/assessing-cross-subsidy-in-australia-post-2013-14" target="new">ACCC's tenth report assessing cross-subsidy between Australia Post services</a> has concluded that Australia Post 'is not using profits from its monopoly reserved letter services to unfairly compete in other markets'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-report-finds-no-cross-subsidy-of-contestable-services-by-australia-post" target="_blank">Press Release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC's proposal to block Qantas/China Eastern coordination agreement criticised by Infrastructure Department</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:03:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>On 24 March the <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182892/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">ACCC issued a draft determination</a> proposing to deny authorisation for Qantas and China Eastern to coordinate operations between Australia and China. One of the<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182892/fromItemId/278039/display/submission" target="_blank"> submissions to the ACCC</a> in response to the draft decision came from the <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D15+45471.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1185811&amp;trimFileName=D15+45471.pdf" target="_blank">Aviation Industry Policy Branch of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development</a>, arguing that the proposed alliance would be 'positive for the Australian economy'. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/accc-slammed-over-decision-to-block-qantas-china-eastern-link/story-e6frg906-1227302002446" target="_blank">Steve Creedy, 'ACCC slammed over decision to block Qantas-China Eastern link' (The Australian, 13 April 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/breaking-news/govt-slams-accc-on-airline-tie-up/story-fnn9c0hb-1227302365120" target="_blank">Dow Jones Newswires, 'Govt slams ACCC on airline tie-up' (Herald Sun, 13 April 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to conduct inquiry into competitiveness of wholesale gas prices</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:03:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Government has directed the ACCC to commence a '12 month public inquiry into the competitiveness of wholesale gas prices in Eastern and Southern Australia'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-inquiry-into-eastern-and-southern-australian-wholesale-gas-prices" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015gas.html" target="_blank">my review  page</a>. See also <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/energy/gas/accc-to-probe-wholesale-gas-prices-on-east-coast-and-south-australia-20150413-1mjo2u" target="_blank">Mark Ludlow, 'ACCC to probe wholesale gas prices on east coast and South Australia' (AFR, 14 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shadow treasurer rejects effects test for section 46</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:46:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Shadow Treasurer, Chris Bowen MP, has an opinion piece in today's AFR in which he opposes the introduction of an effects test for section 46, claiming it represents 'dangerous economic policy': see <a href="http://www.afr.com/opinion/effects-test-will-hamper-competitors-20150409-1mhf7l" target="_blank">Chris Bowen, 'Effects test will hamper competitors' (AFR, 10 April 2015)</a>. See <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html">other Harper Review media here</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Dometic's aquisition of Aircommand</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:45:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Dometic's acquisition of Atwood Investment 9inc Aircommand). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-dometics-acquisition-of-aircommand" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185754/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper media and commentary</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:51:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>There continues to be plenty of media and commentary surrounding the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-report.html">Harper Review Final Report</a>. I have <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html">linked to much of it here</a>, including links to firm commentaries, academic and professional commentary, media commentary and industry responses.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises Bulk Electronic Clearing System (BECS) regulations</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:51:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has re-authorised the suspension and termination provisions of the Australian Payments Clearing Association's (APCA) BECS regulations for a period of ten years. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-re-authorises-bulk-electronic-clearing-system-suspension-termination-regulations" target="_blank">ACCC update</a>.  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1183755/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federation-Novion proposed merger decision delayed to allow further information</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:51:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>On 1 April the ACCC extended the provisional decision date for their review of the Federation Centres proposed merger with Novion to allow parties to provide further information. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184565/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a><strong>.</strong> See further <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/property/accc-extends-review-of-novion-federation-deal/story-fn9656lz-1227293400378" target="_blank">Greg Brown, 'ACCC extends review of Novion-Federation deal' (The Australian, 7 April 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will will not oppose VQIRT’s proposed acquisition of lease to operate automotive terminal at Port of Fremantle</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:50:56 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The ACCC has announced that it 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Victoria Quay International RoRo Terminal Pty Ltd (VQIRT) of a long-term lease to develop and operate the Automotive and RoRo Terminal at the Port of Fremantle, after accepting a court-enforceable undertaking.'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-vqirt%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-lease-to-operate-automotive-terminal-at-port-of-fremantle">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185497/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks views of Viterra's application to introduce long term agreements at SA wehat ports</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:50:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'is seeking comment from interested parties in the bulk wheat export industry on Viterra’s application to introduce long term agreements for shipping at its six South Australian wheat port terminals.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-views-on-viterras-application-to-introduce-long-term-agreements-at-sa-wheat-ports" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report update</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:45:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>There has been plenty of media following the release of the Harper Report. I am compiling links to relevant media on my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html">Harper Media Page</a> (far too many to list here). I have also created a separate '<a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-recs.html">final recommendations page</a>' extracting only the 56 recommendations in the report (including downloadable PDF version) and a <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-recscompared.html">page comparing the draft and final recommendations</a>. More detail will follow progressively.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report - further consultation</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:14:19 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, has launched a consultation on the Harper Review Final Report. <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Competition-Policy-Review-Final-Report" target="_blank">Details here</a>. Submissions due by 26 May 2015</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report out now</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:13:31 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2015/03/Competition-policy-review-report_online.pdf" target="_blank">Harper Competition Policy Review Final Report</a> has now ben released. More to follow on <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-report.html">my report page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report release now 3:15pm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:16:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson's, press conference releasing the Harper Report is now expected at 3:15pm]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report due 2pm</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:35:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, will release the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-report.html">Final Report of the Harper Competition Policy Review</a> at a press conference in Melbourne at 2pm today. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-31/harper-review-to-be-released-outlines-competition-law-strategy/6361156" target="_blank">James Bennett, 'Harper Review to be released today; Federal Government commits to act on report' (ABC News, 31 March 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New legislation proposes to remove s 5 requirement for ministerial consent</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:57:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>On 18 March the Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson MP, introduced the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2015deregulatory.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Deregulatory and Other Measures) Bill 2015</a> into the House. If passed, it will remove the requirement for private parties to seek Ministerial consent when bringing an action for a breach that takes place overseas. The Bill also proposes amendment to s 155 to give the Court power to compel compliance with a s 155 notice. The Bill has now been <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015deregulatory.html">referred to the Senate Economics Committee</a> for consideration. Submissions close on 21 April with a report due on 13 May.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review final report out today</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:13:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-report.html">Final Report of the Harper Competition Policy Review</a> will be released today by Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson. Media ahead of the release includes the following: <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/policy/tax/power-plays-by-big-companies-under-harper-review-spotlight-20150330-1m9m4b" target="_blank">Marianna Papadakis and Jacob Greber, 'Power plays by big companies under Harper review spotlight' (AFR, 30 March 2015)</a> and  <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/legal/harpers-competition-a-threat-to-public-services-acoss-20150330-1m3fk4" target="_blank">Katie Walsh, 'Harper's competition a threat to public services: ACOSS' (AFR, 30 March 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'PM declares war on spud board'</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:13:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Ahead of the release of the <a href="reports/2015harper-report.html" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review Final Report</a> later today, Small Minister Bruce Billson, has accused the anti-competitive WA<a href="http://www.pmc.wa.gov.au/" target="_blank"> Potato Marketing Corporation</a> of imposing a net detriment on WA citizens of around $3.8 million a year. See <a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/26870357/pm-declares-war-on-spud-board/" target="_blank">Andrew Probyn and Shane Wright, 'PM declares war on spud board' (The West Australian, 31 March 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review final report due tomorrow</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:13:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="reports/2015harper-report.html">Final Report of the Harper Competition Policy Review</a> will be released tomorrow by Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson. The Minister has an opinion piece in today's Australian - <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/harper-holds-promise-of-greater-competition/story-e6frg6zo-1227283653390" target="_blank">see Bruce Billson, 'Harper holds promise of greater competition' (The Australian, 30 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICN Conference to cost $500k</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2015 08:13:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Featuring prominently in the news today is the anticipated cost of the next <a href="http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/" target="_blank">International Competition Network</a> conference, to be hosted by the ACCC in Sydney next month. This will be the 14th annual conference of the ICN, which was established in 2001. The ACCC was one of the founding 16 member agencies of the Network which now comprises over 100 competition agencies from almost as many jurisdictions. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/accc-international-competition-network-conference-to-cost-500k-20150328-1m9lki.html" target="_blank">Matthew Knott, 'ACCC International Competition Network conference to cost $500k' (SMH, 29 March 2015)</a>. For details about the conference see the <a href="http://www.icn2015.com.au/" target="_blank">conference home page</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report to be released next Tuesday</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:25:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[            <p>The Harper Report is now with Bruce Billson MP and will be released next Tuesday. This will be followed by a further period of consultation of 8-10 weeks. See <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015harper-report.html">Report page</a> for further details. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC watching Heinz-Kraft merger</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:29:38 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Fairfax is reporting that the ACCC is watching the proposed merger between Heinz and Kraft, announced overnight. The transaction is subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals (among other things). See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/manufacturing/accc-keeps-its-eye-on-heinzkraft-59b-merger-20150326-1m7ytd" target="_blank">Madeleine Heffernan, 'ACCC keeps its eye on Heinz-Kraft $59b merger' (AFR, 26 March 2015)</a> (also on <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/world-business/accc-keeps-its-eye-on-heinzkraft-59b-merger-20150326-1m7ytd.html" target="_blank">SMH website</a>). See also <a href="http://news.heinz.com/press-release/finance/hj-heinz-company-and-kraft-foods-group-sign-definitive-merger-agreement-form-k" target="_blank">Heinz, 'H.J. Heinz Company and Kraft Foods Group Sign Definitive Merger Agreement to Form The Kraft Heinz Company' (Heinz Press Room, 25 March 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fortescue releases statement on Forrest's iron ore comments</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:34:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fortescue Metals has released a statement relating to Chairman, Andrew Forrest's, comments relating to capping iron ore production. In it, reference is made to the provisions of <a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca51.html">section 51(2)(g)</a> of the Act dealing with goods exclusively exported. The ACCC has, however, observed that iron ore is not <em>exclusively </em>exported from Australia. The statement can be viewed from the <a href="http://www.asx.com.au/asx/research/company.do#!/FMG" target="_blank">ASX site</a> or attached to the following article: <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-25/fortescue-metals-defends-andrew-forrests-comments/6348276" target="_blank">Elysse Morgan, 'Fortescue Metals defends chairman Andrew Forrest's 'cap iron ore' comments' (ABC News, 26 March 2015)</a>. </p>
<p>Plenty of media on the issue as well. See, for example, <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2015/3/25/resources-and-energy/why-accc-was-so-quick-leap-twiggy" target="_blank">Stephen Bartholemuesz, 'Why the ACCC was so quick to leap on Twiggy' (Business Spectator, 25 March 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/mining/iron-ore/accc-guns-for-andrew-forrest-over-call-for-iron-ore-cartel-20150325-1m768l" target="_blank">Matthew Stevens, Phillip Coorey and Tess Ingram, '' (AFR, 26 March 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/mining/iron-ore/fortescues-andrew-forrest-says-rio-tinto-bhp-billiton-face-iron-ore-prisoners-dilemma-20150325-1m7o6b" target="_blank">Matthew Stevens, 'Fortescue's Andrew Forrest says Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton face iron ore 'prisoner's dilemma' (AFR, 26 March 2015)</a> and <a href="ACCC concerned about Andrew Forrest’s call for an iron ore cartel" target="_blank">Matt Chambers and David Crowe, 'ACCC concerned about Andrew Forrest’s call for an iron ore cartel' (The Australian, 26 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC responds to Forrest's comments</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:26:20 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has indicated that the ACCC will be looking closely at Andrew Forrest's comments calling for iron producers to work together to cap iron ore production, noting that 'any attempt by Australian businesses to encourage competitors to restrict outputs is a matter of grave concern to the ACCC'. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-responds-to-fortescues-andrew-forrests-calls-for-iron-ore-production-cap" target="_blank">press release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/accc-investigates-andrew-forrest-call-for-cap-on-iron-ore-production/story-e6frg9df-1227277776667" target="_blank">Matt Chambers and David Crowe, 'ACCC investigates Andrew Forrest call for cap on iron ore production (The Australian, 25 March 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/mining/iron-ore/joe-hockey-rejects-andrew-forrests-cartel-call-for-iron-ore-cap-20150325-1m768l" target="_blank">Phillip Coorey and Lisa Murray, 'Joe Hockey rejects Andrew Forrest's 'cartel' call for iron ore cap' (AFR, 25 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fortescue's Andrew Forrest calls for iron ore production cap</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:25:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>At a dinner in Shanghai last night Andrew Forrest, founder and chairman of Fortescue Metals Group' called for a cap in iron ore production to respond to price drops. See <a href="http://www.tradingroom.com.au/apps/view_article.ac?articleId=6384243" target="_blank">AAP, 'Twiggy hits back at big miners over glut' (Trading Room, 25 March 2015)</a>; <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/mining-and-resources/twiggy-forrest-calls-on-iron-ore-miners-to-cap-production-to-end-price-rout-20150324-1m71od.html" target="_blank">Lisa Murray, 'Twiggy Forrest calls on iron ore miners to cap production to end price rout' (SMH, 25 March 2015)</a> and  <a href="http://www.afr.com/news/world/fortescues-andrew-forrest-calls-for-iron-ore-production-cap-20150325-1m6xlk" target="_blank">Lisa Murray, 'Fortescue's Andrew Forrest calls for iron ore production cap' (AFR, 25 March 2015). </a> Wow.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny Qantas/China Eastern coordination agreement</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:25:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to deny authorisation for Qantas and China Eastern to coordinate operations between Australia and China. Submissions on the draft decision are due by 8 April 2015. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-deny-qantas-china-eastern-coordination-agreement" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182892/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose Denka/Mitsui’s proposed acquisition of DuPont’s chloroprene rubber business</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:25:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose Denka Performance Elastomer LLC’s proposed acquisition of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont)’s chloroprene rubber business'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-denka-mitsui%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-dupont%E2%80%99s-chloroprene-rubber-business" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185310/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ferguson: 'Business awaits Ian Harper's report on competition policy'</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2015 09:24:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Adele Ferguson has an item in today's Financial Review regarding the imminent release of the <a href="reports/2014harper.html">Harper review</a> final report. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/business-awaits-ian-harpers-report-on-competition-policy-20150322-1m4yhz" target="_blank">Adele Ferguson, 'Business awaits Ian Harper's report on competition policy' (AFR, 22 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bannerman Lecture published</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:24:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The High Court has now published Chief Justice French's Bannerman Lecture, delivered on 26 February 2015: <a href="readingroom/2015/2015french-bannerman.html">French, <em>The Moving Finger Writes and, Having Writ, Rewrites</em>, Bannerman Lecture, Sydney, 26 February 2015</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to appeal Pfizer</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:24:11 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC will appeal the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2015pfizer.html">Pfizer decision</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-pfizer-decision" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report to be released later this month</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:20:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Harper Report, expected for release this week, has now been delayed for release later this month.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reviewing Ramsay's proposed acquisition of Wollongong Day Surgery</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:20:14 +1100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC yesterday commenced an informal review of Health Care Corporation Pty Ltd (Ramsay's) proposed acquisition of Wollongong Day Surgery. Market inquiry letters have been sent with a closing date for submission of 2 April 2015. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185232/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/ramsay-health-care-facing-competition-health-check/story-e6frg9io-1227266199948" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Ramsay Health Care facing competition health check' (The Australian, 17 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
    </item>
     <item>
      <title>Grocery code of conduct review</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Senate Economics Legislation Committee is examining whether the proposed voluntary code would be effective and will report by the end of the month. The review follows the tabling of the new <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Committees/clac_ctte/Food_and_Grocery_2015/regulation.pdf" target="_blank">Food and Grocery Code of Conduct </a>regulations in parliament on 2 March. <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Food_and_Grocery_2015/Submissions" target="_blank">Submissions</a> closed on 13 March 2015; five submissions were received (NZ Food &amp; Grocery Council, Office of the Australian Small Business Commissioner, Law Council of Australia, Australian Dairy Farmers and Retail &amp; Supplier Roundtable). See <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2015grocery.html">my review page</a> for more detail.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:34:57 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Report to be released later this month</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Harper Report, expected for release this week, has now been delayed for release later this month. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/ramsay-health-care-facing-competition-health-check/story-e6frg9io-1227266199948" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Ramsay Health Care facing competition health check' (The Australian, 17 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:18:49 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reviewing Ramsay's proposed acquisition of Wollongong Day Surgery</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC yesterday commenced an informal review of Health Care Corporation Pty Ltd (Ramsay's) proposed acquisition of Wollongong Day Surgery. Market inquiry letters have been sent with a closing date for submission of 2 April 2015. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185232/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/ramsay-health-care-facing-competition-health-check/story-e6frg9io-1227266199948" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Ramsay Health Care facing competition health check' (The Australian, 17 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:18:36 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Container port regulation</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The AFR has an item on Sims' call for the ACCC to be given authority to intervene in pricing disputes at Australia's ports. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/infrastructure/ports/container-ports-need-regulation-to-prevent-soaring-rents-accc-chief-rod-sims-20150315-143kz4" target="_blank">Jenny Wiggins, 'Container ports need regulation to prevent soaring rents: ACCC chief Rod Sims' (Australian Financial Review, 16 March 2015)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-needs-bigger-role-in-regulating-ports-says-asciano-ceo-20150311-140q9b.html" target="_blank">Lucille Keen and Jenny Wiggins, 'ACCC needs bigger role in regulating ports, says Asciano CEO' (SMH, 11 March 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/asciano-and-dp-world-urge-accc-action-on-ports/story-fn91v9q3-1227259148635" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'Asciano and DP World urge ACCC action on ports' (The Australian, 12 March 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:56:39 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC monitoring TPG Telecom's proposed takeover of iiNet</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC is monitoring TPG Telecom's proposed acquisition of iiNet Limited, noting a public review will be commenced once a submission is received from the merger parties (see <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185185/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>). See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-ready-to-review-tpg-iinet-merger/story-e6frg8zx-1227263886695" target="_blank">Paul Garvey, 'ACCC ready to review TPG-iiNet merger' (The Australian, 16 March 2015)</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:56:23 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and AER publish International Insights for the Better Economic Regulation of Infrastructure</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>ACCC and AER have jointly published their tenth working paper, titled <em><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/International%20Insights%20for%20the%20Better%20Economic%20Regulation%20of%20Infrastructure.pdf" target="_blank">International Insights for the Better Economic Regulation of Infrastructure</a></em>. See<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-aer-publish-paper-exploring-better-economic-regulation-of-infrastructure" target="_blank"> press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/about-regulated-infrastructure/regulatory-resources/working-discussion-papers" target="_blank">other working and discussion papers relating to regulated infrastructure</a>.           </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:56:08 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise magazine pilot program</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1183386/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to authorise the Association of Magazine Publishers of Australia to run a pilot program with 20 newsagents to 'test the effectiveness of a proposed approach to address longstanding problems with the oversupply of magazines to newsagents'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-magazine-pilot-program" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1183386/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:55:47 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Economics Committee recommends s 46 divestiture bill not be passed</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>A couple of weeks ago Senate Economics Legislation Committee released its <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Competition_Bill_2014/Report" target="_blank">report</a> on the <em>Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2014. </em>The bill was introduced by Independent Senator, Nick Xenophon, last year and would have introduced a divestiture remedy for contraventions of the misuse of market power provision. The Committee (Senator Xenophon dissenting) recommended that the Senate not pass the bill. See <a href="reports/2014mmp.html">my Inquiry page</a> for further details.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:55:18 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft access price for Telstra's copper network</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/fixed-line-services/fixed-line-services-fad-inquiry-2013/draft-decision" target="_blank">draft prices for access</a> to Telstra's copper network. The final decision is expected by the end of June 2015. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-draft-prices-access-seekers-will-pay-to-use-telstras-copper-network" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:55:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper: public policy matters</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR has an item today on Ian Harper and the Competition Policy Review. See <a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/harper_economist_because_public_EYNz5BPd4rS6B98TEt4V5M" target="_blank">Katie Walsh: '&quot;I'm an economist because public policy matters for people's lives&quot;: Ian Harper' (Australian Financial Review, 10 March 2015)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:54:45 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First ACCC regional petrol market study to take place in Darwin</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced that Darwin will be the first regional location to be studied under the new petrol monitoring arrangements. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-announces-first-regional-petrol-market-study-in-darwin" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:54:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on Harper Reforms</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has an item in today's Australian on the Harper Reforms, with the final report of the panel expected to be released later this month. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-review-to-test-canberras-mood-for-reform/story-e6frg9io-1227249106164" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Harper review to test Canberra&rsquo;s mood for reform' (5 March 2015, <em>The Australian</em>)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:54:17 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Annual telecommunications report (2013-2014) tabled in Parliament</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-telecommunications-report/accc-telecommunications-report-2013-14" target="_blank">ACCC's annual telecommunications report for 2013-2014</a> was tabled in Parliament yesterday and show a drop in prices paid by consumers for telecommunications services during that time. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/consumers-continue-to-benefit-from-falling-prices-for-telecommunications-services" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:54:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Woodside's propsed acquisition of Apache Corporations interests in the Wheatstone, Balnaves and Kitimat Projects</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose Woodside’s proposed acquisition of Apache Corporation’s interests in the Wheatstone and Balnaves Projects (in the Northern Carnarvon Basin, off WA) and the Kitimat Project (in Canada). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-woodside%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-apache-corporation%E2%80%99s-interests-in-the-wheatstone-balnaves-and-kitimat-projects" target="_blank">Press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185081/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:53:49 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Seven's proposed acquisition of share s in Foxtel's Presto Entertainment service</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced 'that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of shares in the Presto Entertainment subscription video on demand (SVOD) service by Seven Network Operations, a subsidiary of Seven West Media'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-seven%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-shares-in-foxtel%E2%80%99s-presto-entertainment-service" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185016/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 13:53:34 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chief Justice delivers inaugural Bannerman lecture</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Chief Justice of the High Court, Robert French AC, delivered the inaugural Bannerman lecture in Sydney yesterday. <a href="experts/bannerman-ron.html">Ron Bannerman</a> was the Commissioner of Trade Practices from 1966 to October 1974. He was appointed Chairman of the Trade Practices Commission when it was established in October 1974 and remained Chairman until his retirement in December 1984.  ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, also launched a biography of Ron Bannerman (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/ronald-moore-bannerman-ao" target="_blank">Ronald Moore Bannerman AO - Honesty, Responsibility &amp; Competition</a>) at the event. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/chief-justice-delivers-inaugural-bannerman-lecture" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:51:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Macquarie, Fairfax radio merger</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose Macquarie Radio Network Limited’s (MRN) proposed acquisition of the radio assets of Fairfax Media Limited or Fairfax's proposed acquisition of 54.5% of MRN.  The ACCC concluded that 'the combined Macquarie/Fairfax radio business would continue to face strong competition from other commercial radio stations. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-macquarie-fairfax-radio-merger" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1185004/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:51:38 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pfizer judgment now available</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The reasons for judgment in <em>ACCC v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd</em> [2015] FCA 113 have now been published on the <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2015/2015fca0113" target="_blank">Federal Court website</a> and on <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2015/113.html" target="_blank">AustLII</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:51:05 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on Pfizer case</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>More media on the Pfizer case this morning. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/pfizer-court-win-on-lipitor-a-blow-for-accc/story-e6frg8y6-1227239115837" target="_blank">Leo Shanahan, 'Pfizer court win on Lipitor a blow for ACCC' (The Australian, 26 February 2015)</a>, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/feb/25/court-dismisses-case-accusing-pfizer-australia-of-anti-competitive-conduct" target="_blank">Melissa Davey, 'Court dismisses case accusing Pfizer Australia of anti-competitive conduct' (The Guardian, 25 February 2015)</a>. The reasons for judgment are expected to be made public today.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:14:10 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases first quarterly petrol report</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC this morning released its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/quarterly-report-on-the-australian-petroleum-industry/quarterly-report-on-the-australian-petroleum-industry-february-2015" target="_blank">first quarterly report</a> into the Australian petroleum industry for 2015. The report covers the period June-December 2014, with some additional information relating to January 2015. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-first-quarterly-petrol-report" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:13:51 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court dismisses Pfizer case</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Federal Court today handed down it's judgment in <em>ACCC v Pfizer Australia</em>.  The ACCC had alleged misuse of market power and exclusive dealing in relation to Pfizer's supply of atorvastatin to pharmacies. Justice Flick dismissed the ACCC's application and awarded costs to the Pfizer. The misuse of market power case failed on the basis that the requisite proscribed purpose was not established and that (post-2012) Pfizer's market power was not 'substantial' (the controversial 'take advantage' element was established). The exclusive dealing claim failed on the basis that Pfizer did not have the purpose of substantially lessening competition. </p>
           <p>The reasons for judgment are expected to be made public tomorrow. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-dismisses-anti-competitive-conduct-case-against-pfizer-australia" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2015/02/accc-pfails-section-46-prosecution-brief/" target="_blank">Peta Stevenson, 'ACCC Pfails in section 46 prosecution - in brief' (King &amp; Wood Mallesons, <em>In Competition </em>blog, 25 February 2015)</a> and <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com.au/accc-loses-misuse-of-market-power-case-against-pfizer-over-cholesterol-lowering-drug-2015-2" target="_blank">Simon Thomsen, 'ACCC loses misuse of market power case against Pfizer over cholesterol lowering drug' (Business Insider Australia, 25 February 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:50:59 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC enforcement priorities</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Clayton Utz's Kirsten Webb and Ian Reynolds have published an update on the ACCC's enforcement priorities following the release of the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/compliance-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">ACCC's Compliance and Enforcement Policy </a>last week: '<a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201502/24/accc_enforcement_priorities_2015_old_chestnuts_and_new_acorns.page" target="_blank">ACCC enforcement priorities 2015: old chestnuts and new acorns</a>' (24 February 2015)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:50:40 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose GSK - Novartis deal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has today announced that it will 'not oppose GlaxoSmithKline’s and Novartis’ transactions involving over-the-counter consumer products, human vaccines and oncology products'.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-three-part-gsk-%E2%80%93-novartis-deal" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184886/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:38:18 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC's 2015 compliance and enforcement policy</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, launched the 2015 edition of the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/compliance-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">ACCC Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> today. The following areas related to competition law and policy re listed as priorities:</p>
        <ul>
          <li> competition and consumer issues in the health and medical sectors </li>
          <li>cartel conduct impacting on government procurement </li>
          <li>ensuring compliance with new or amended industry codes of conduct, including the Franchising Code and the proposed Food and Grocery Code </li>
          <li>competition and consumer issues in highly concentrated sectors, including issues identified through the ACCC’s monitoring of the fuel industry </li>
        </ul>
        <p>The policy notes that 'some forms of conduct that are so detrimental to consumer welfare and   the competitive process that the ACCC will always regard them as a   priority' including 'cartel conduct, anti-competitive agreements and   practices, and the misuse of market power.' Matters falling outside these priority areas will also be given priority where they demonstrate particular factors - these factors include:</p>
        <ul>
          <li>conduct of significant public interest or concern</li>
          <li>conduct resulting in a substantial consumer (including small business) detriment</li>
          <li>conduct demonstrating a blatant disregard for the law</li>
          <li>conduct involving issues of national or international significance</li>
          <li>conduct involving essential goods and services</li>
          <li>conduct in concentrated markets which impacts on small business consumers or suppliers</li>
          <li>conduct involving a significant new or emerging market issue</li>
          <li>where ACCC action is likely to have a worthwhile educative or deterrent effect, and/or</li>
          <li>where the person, business or industry has a history of previous   contraventions of competition, consumer protection or fair trading laws. </li>
        </ul>
        <p>See related <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/priorities-2015" target="_blank">speech</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-announces-priorities-and-strives-for-tougher-penalties" target="_blank">media release</a> or <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/compliance-and-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">download print version of the policy</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:37:51 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues draft determination on NBN Co's LTRCM</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has today issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/LTRCM%20-%202013-14%20-%20Draft%20Determination%20For%20publication.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a> on NBN Co's Long Term Revenue Constraint Methodology, concluding that NBN Co's proposal 'meets the expenditure criteria set out in the Special Access Undertaking'. Stakeholder views are due by 27 March 2015. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-draft-determination-on-nbn-co%E2%80%99s-ltrcm" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/national-broadband-network/nbn-co-special-access-undertaking-implementation/sau-implementation-2014" target="_blank">NBN Co - Special Access Undertaking implementation page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:37:29 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims outlines ACCC priorities</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has outlined the ACCC's priorities in his first speech of the year. Launching the 2015 edition of the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/compliance-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">ACCC Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> at CEDA today, Sims announced 'cartel conduct in government procurement, truth in advertising,   competition and consumer issues in the health sector and industry   codes as new priorities'. Sims' speech also sets out the ACCC's activities in relation to a number of areas of competition law (cartels, anti-competitive agreements and practices, MMP (noting the ACCC has 'about' 10 in depth investigations underway)) and touches on the Harper Review and Murray Report as well as key issues surrounding privatisation, communications and water. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/priorities-2015" target="_blank">View speech</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-announces-priorities-and-strives-for-tougher-penalties" target="_blank">related media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:37:12 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Statement of Issues on proposed Sea Swift acquisition of Toll Marine Logistics</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+1683.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1184869&amp;trimFileName=MER15+1683.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issue</a>s on the proposed acquisition by Sea Swift of the NT and North Qld marine freight business of Toll Marine Logistics. The ACCC has raised concerns that the proposed acquisition may SLC in the supply of marine freight services in NT and Qld; in particular, concern has been raised that 'the proposed acquisition is likely to lead to significant price increases as it will result in a monopoly on many routes'. Submissions on the SOI close on 13 March and a final decision from the ACCC is expected on 16 April. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-acquisition-by-sea-swift-of-toll-marine-logistics" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1183062/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:36:51 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beer investigation now ACCC priority</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Media reports today that the ACCC's investigation into beer tap arrangements by <em>Lion </em>and <em>Carlton &amp; United </em>has been elevated to a 'priority matter'. See Adele Ferguson, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/beer-battle-priority-as-accc-puts-heat-on-lion-carlton--united-over-beer-tap-deals-20150216-13fno0.html" target="_blank">Beer battle 'priority' as ACCC puts heat on Lion, Carlton &amp; United over beer tap deals</a>' (SMH, 16 February 2015). See also Pat McGrath, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-11/small-brewers-locked-out-of-pubs-by-big-corporates/6086396" target="_blank">Small brewers locked out of pubs by big corporates: Choice</a>' (ABC News, 11 February 2015).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:47:59 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jurisdictional limits of cartel laws</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>DLA Piper's latest Competition and Regulation update focuses on jurisdictional limits of cartel laws in Australia and NZ - see David Bamberger, Simon Uthemeyer and Alec White, '<a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/jurisdictional-limits-of-cartel-laws-in-34831/" target="_blank">Jurisdictional limits of cartel laws in Australia and the United States - ACCC v Air New Zealand and Motorola Mobility v AU Optronics</a>' (DLA Piper, Competition and Regulation Update, February 2015)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:47:21 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel Law and Enforcement</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Global Legal Group Ltd, London, have published the third edition of Global Legal Insights - Cartels. Peta Stevenson, Wayne Leach and Sharon Henrick of King&amp;Wood Mallesons contributed the chapter on Australia. The chapter can be viewed online or purchased online - you can access from the following link: <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2015/02/cartel-law-enforcement/" target="_blank">Peta Stevenson, 'Cartel Law and Enforcement' (<em>In Competition</em>, 9 February 2015)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:47:06 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Three more <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/non-confidential-submissions/" target="_blank">submissions on the Harper Review Draft Report</a> were published on 6 February: </p>
        <ul>
          <li><a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2015/02/Communications.pdf" target="_blank">Department of Communications</a> (acknowledges draft reports's recognition of new technologies and applications 'digitally disrupting' the way markets operate, but suggests final report 'would benefit from a stronger focus on the impact of digital disruption and new technologies in offering the potential to identify new competitive opportunities for industries across the economy, and opening up many existing markets to greater competition'.  The Department's 10-page submission goes on to make 'observations in relation to digital disruption and enablement' in relation to several of the draft recommendations - includes reference to <a href="reports/2014nbn.html">Vertigan panel </a>recommendations).</li>
          <li><a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2015/02/Ergas_Pincus.pdf" target="_blank">Prof H Ergas and Prof J Pincus</a> (addresses recommendations relating to <strong>pharmacy</strong> recommendations) </li>
          <li><a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2015/02/NT_Govt.pdf" target="_blank">Northern Territory Government</a> (runs through each of the <strong>draft policy recommendations </strong>(most supported in principle - some with reservations), supports measures to 'streamline and simplify' competition laws but 'reserves its position on the <strong>application of competition law to government activities</strong>' until it can fully assess implications on the Territory, runs through institutions and governance recommendations (establishment of ACCP and its proposed roles is supported in principle; recommends ACCP have <strong>mandatory information-gathering powers</strong> for purpose of undertaking market studies; generally supports other recommendations on institution and governance, but requires more information before view can be formed 'as to whether access and pricing functions should be undertaken by a single regulator'), discusses <strong>retail markets</strong> recommendations (supports removal of restrictions on retail trading hours and removal of pharmacy ownership and location rules).</li>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:08:37 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RPM authorisation </title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Johnson Winter &amp; Slattery's Sar Katdare has published a piece on the ACCC's recent authorisation of RPM conduct by Tooltechnic Systems - it provides a useful overview of the relevant issues and decision in the Tooltechnic case. See Sar Katdare, '<a href="http://www.jws.com.au/en/legal-updates-archive/item/549-landmark-decision-by-accc-to-authorise-resale-price-maintenance-on-public-benefit-grounds-will-this-open-the-floodgates" target="_blank">Landmark decision by ACCC to authorise resale price maintenance on public benefit grounds - will this open the floodgates?</a>' (Johnson Winter &amp; Slattery, February 2015)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:07:49 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes move to allow competition law exemptions at grain ports</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC told a <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Rural_and_Regional_Affairs_and_Transport/Grains_2014" target="_blank">Senate Inquiry</a> yesterday that it disagrees with moves by Agriculture Minister, Barnaby Joyce, to allow competition law exemptions at grain ports. See Sarina Locke, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-05/accc-concerned-grain-port-competition/6071960" target="_blank">Australian Competition and Consumer Commission concerned over grain transport monopoly in Western Australia</a>' (ABC Rural, 6 February 2015). Transcript not yet available.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:47:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for public comment on proposed Federation/Novion merger</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC commenced an informal review of the proposed Federation/Novion merger on Wednesday. Submissions from interested parties are due on 25 February. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184565/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC Merger Register</a>. See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/accc-steps-in-over-federation-novion-deal/story-e6frg906-1227210027106?nk=58fc6a1defa08a2b685116bd476623b8" target="_blank">ACCC steps in over Federation, Novion deal</a>' (The Australian, 6 February 2015) and Michael Roddan, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/property/federation-centres-novion-in-11-billion-merger-plan/story-fn9656lz-1227206031078" target="_blank">Federation Centres, Novion in $11 billion merger plan</a>' (Business Spectator, 3 February 2015)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:46:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose JBS's proposed acquisition of Primo</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC will not oppose JBS USA Holdings Inc’s proposed acquisition of Australian Consolidated Food Holdings Pty Limited (Primo). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-jbss-proposed-acquisition-of-primo" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184586/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:46:35 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to review allegations of price-fixing involving supply of chicken </title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian reports that the ACCC will probe allegations of price-fixing involving Australia's biggest chicken supplier, Baiada. See Ben Butler, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-to-probe-alleged-price-fixing-involving-biggest-chicken-supplier/story-e6frg8zx-1227204285298?sv=33bab0626f30842751de4e3f25cf21d1&amp;nk=5c6188380f5cd0554ed06a7dd4175252#.VM9Dk_04Rjo.twitter" target="_blank">ACCC to probe alleged price-fixing involving biggest chicken supplier</a>' (The Australian, 2 February 2014). See also Stephen Drill, 'Chicken giant Baiada reported for alleged price fixing' (Herald Sun, 1 February 2015)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:46:14 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Too big to care - Coles and Woolies in 2015</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Alexandra Merrett has another great piece in The Conversation today about Coles and Woolworths - reviewing the conduct and legal investigations in 2014 and making some predictions about 2014. <a href="http://theconversation.com/too-big-to-care-will-coles-and-woolies-lift-their-game-in-2015-36430" target="_blank">View article</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:45:39 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Etihad/Alitalia alliance</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has granted authorisation to Etihad and Alitalia in relation to a co-operation agreement relating to the supply of international air transport services. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-grants-authorisation-to-etihad-alitalia-alliance">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182783/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:45:17 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN - Variation of Telstra's Migration Plan</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Government has finalised two regulatory instruments supporting the variation of Telstra's migration plan. They can be found <a href="http://www.communications.gov.au/broadband/national_broadband_network" target="_blank">here</a>. This allows Telstra to lodge its revised Migration Plan with the ACCC. See ACCC '<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/industry-reform/telstras-migration-plan" target="_blank">Telstra's migration plan</a>' website. See also Richard Chirgwin, '<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/27/governments_rushed_nbn_migration_plan_off_to_the_accc/" target="_blank">Government's rushed NBN migration plan off to the ACCC: Consultation? We've heard of it</a>' (27 January 2015)), Josh Taylor, 'Turnbull ticks Telstra-NBN HFC migration plan' (ZDNet, 27 January 2015) and Baker &amp; McKenzie, '<a href="http://bakerxchange.com/rv/ff001c8e96b9e598bfdbfe4c154982f31391e7ba" target="_blank">Telecommunications Regulatory Update - December 2014</a>'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:17:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions published</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Some more Harper Review submissions have been published on the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/non-confidential-submissions/" target="_blank">Review website</a>. These include submissions from the Queensland and Tasmanian Governments and the Office of the Australian Small Business Commissioner. See also <a href="reports/2014harper-submissions2.html">my submissions page</a> (summaries still in progress).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:16:52 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie: ACCC to review Macquarie, Fairfax radio merger</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Durie has a pice in the Austrlaian today about the ACCC's review of the Macquarie, Fairfax merger. See John Durie, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2015/1/16/media-and-digital/accc-review-macquarie-fairfax-radio-merger" target="_blank">ACCC to review Macquarie, Fairfax radio merger</a>' (The Australian, 16 January 2015).  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1184152/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:16:37 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Competition: ACCC hot hits for 2015</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>King &amp; Wood Mallesons' Blog, <em>In Competition</em>, has kicked of the year with a post by Annabel Deans which analyses 'recent  trends to assess any similarities in enforcement priorities between regulators in the UK and Australia.' See Annabel Deans and Taylor MacDonald, '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2015/01/2015-hot-hits-accc-cma/" target="_blank">2015 Hot Hits for the ACCC and CMA</a>' (<em>In Competition</em>, 16 January 2015)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:16:23 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Petrol Price Reports</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC will produce at least eight petrol price reports in 2015 following a <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/069-2014/" target="_blank">direction by Minister Bruce Billson</a>. These will include quarterly macro reports and at least four market studies reports. See ACCC, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/acccs-new-petrol-price-reports" target="_blank">ACCC's new petrol price reports</a>' (ACCC media release, 15 January 2015).  See also Lisa Visentin, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/allegations-of-petrol-price-gouging-in-rural-areas-prompts-accc-scrutiny-20150114-12nyd2.html" target="_blank">Allegations of petrol price gouging in rural areas prompts ACCC scrutiny</a>' (SMH, 15 January 2015)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:16:07 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Woodside deal to be assessed by ACCC</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC will review Woodside's multi-billion dollar deal to buy Apache Corporation's interests in the Wheatstone, Balnaves and Kitimat projects. The ACCC commenced its review on 24 December. Market inquiry letters were sent on 12 January with submissions due 2 Feb 2015. The provisional date for an ACCC announcement is 5 March 2015. See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/woodside-deal-under-accc-scrutiny-20150114-12nth1.html" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also Angela Macdonald-Smith, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/woodside-deal-under-accc-scrutiny-20150114-12nth1.html" target="_blank">Woodside deal under ACCC scrutiny</a>' (SMH Business Day, 14 January 2015) </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:15:52 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expedia PCA released</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has released their public competition assessment relating to Expedia's acquisition of Wotif. The 16 page assessment can be <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER15+228.pdf&amp;trimFileFromItemId=1182044&amp;trimFileName=MER15+228.pdf" target="_blank">viewed here</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:15:30 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles' unconscionable conduct</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/1405.html" target="_blank">Federal Court has found Coles engaged in unconscionable conduct </a>and ordered Coles to pay $10 million penalties. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-finds-coles-engaged-in-unconscionable-conduct-and-orders-coles-pay-10-million-penalties" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:15:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition out now</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The latest <em><a href="https://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_21_SLC_.pdf" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a></em>is out now - the focus is SLC: &quot;... rather than our usual 'year in review', this year we’re finishing up with a reflective piece on just what the substantial lessening of competition test involves. As the slogan says, it’s time for
less opinion, more expertise.&quot; As always, a must read - especially if you want to find out why John Glenn was
'contemplating competition law while in space'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:14:53 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions available</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The fourth batch of Harper Review submissions on the draft report have been published on the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/non-confidential-submissions/" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review</a> website.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:14:38 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC appeals Air Cargo decision</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will appeal the Air Cargo cartel decision; the case failed at first instance because the Court found there was no relevant 'markt in Australia'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-air-cargo-cartel-decision" target="_blank">press release</a>. For the judgment see: <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/1157.html" target="_blank">Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited [2014] FCA 1157</a>. See also <a href="ACCC appeals court’s dismissal of cartel case against Air NZ, Garuda">'ACCC appeals court’s dismissal of cartel case against Air NZ, Garuda; (Business Spectator, 17 December 2014)</a> and <a href="http://www.concurrences.com/Bulletin/News-Issues/December-2014/The-Federal-Court-of-Australia-70608?lang=en" target="_blank">my note on this case</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:14:16 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and Coles seek consent orders</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC and Coles have made joint submissions to the Federal Court seeking consent orders from the Court. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-and-coles-seek-consent-orders-to-resolve-unconscionable-conduct-proceedings" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/retail/coles-to-refund-suppliers-as-it-settles-cases-with-accc-20141215-12792f.html" target="_blank">Sue Mitchell and Madeleine Heffernan, 'Coles to refund suppliers as it settles cases with ACCC
          ' (The Age, 15 December 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:13:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper Submissions published</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The third batch of submissions on the Harper Competition Review Draft Report have now been published on the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/non-confidential-submissions/" target="_blank">Review website</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:13:35 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises RP</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has granted conditional authorisation for Tooltechnic Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd to set minimum retail prices on Festool power tools until 31 December 2018. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-minimum-retail-prices-on-festool-power-tools" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179445/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:13:19 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New cartel action</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has instituted proceedings against electrical cable suppliers alleging cartel and exclusionary conduct in the supply and acquisition of electrical cable. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-electrical-cable-suppliers-for-alleged-cartel" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>
        ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:12:59 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper media</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Some more items of interest in the last couple of days: <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/brickbats-for-brickworks/story-e6frg9io-1227136169431" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Brickbats for Brickworks' (The Australian, 27 November 2014)</a> (scroll down to 'Harper&rsquo;s way' section), <a href="http://www.thecattlesite.com/news/46993/farmers-back-government-draft-report" target="_blank">'Farmers Back Government Draft Report' (The Cattle Site, 24 November 2014)</a>, <a href="http://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=42346#.VHgu1sngUrE" target="_blank">Julie Edwards, 'Harper Review's new world of public service for profit' (Eureka Street, 27 November 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:12:18 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow WATAB collective bargaining authorisation</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC proposes to grant a ten year authorisation for the WATAB Agents' Association Incorporated to collectively negotiate terms and conditions of service behalf of members with Racing and Wagering Western Australia and to participate in dispute resolution processes between RWWA and agents. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-authorise-watab-agents’-to-engage-in-collective-bargaining-dispute-resolution" target="_blank">ACCC proposes to authorise W.A.T.A.B Agents&rsquo; to engage in collective bargaining &amp; dispute resolution (ACCC Update, 29 November 2014)</a> .  See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182577/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:11:57 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a bit of media on some of the Harper Review submissions recently. See, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-super-slaps-big-bank-bundling/story-e6frg8zx-1227133573023" target="_blank">Andrew White, 'Industry super slaps big bank bundling ' (The Australian, 25 November 2014)</a> and , <a href="http://adf.farmonline.com.au/news/magazine/industry-news/general/adf-calls-for-mandatory-code/2718236.aspx" target="_blank">'ADF calls for mandatory code' (The Australian Dairy Farmer, 26 November 2014)</a>, <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/firms-and-the-bar/minter-ellison-announces-general-support-of-harper-review-draft-report/3028719.article" target="_blank">'Minter Ellison announces general support of Harper Review draft report' (The Lawyer, 21 November 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:11:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC submission to Harper</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC's submission on the draft report is <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Competition Policy Review - ACCC submission to Draft Report - 26 November 2014.pdf" target="_blank">now available here</a> (it is not yet available on the Review website). See also the accompanying <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-responds-to-harper-review-panel’s-draft-report" target="_blank">press release</a>. For commentary see, for example, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/harper-review-would-weaken-cartel-laws-accc/story-e6frg906-1227135475996" target="_blank"> Michael Roddan, 'Harper review would weaken cartel laws: ACCC' 
          
          (Business Spectator, 26 November 2014)</a> and <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/accc-warns-on-cartel-law-changes-20141126-11udf9.html" target="_blank">Georgia Wilkins, 'ACCC warns on cartel law changes'
            (The Age, 27 November 2014)
            
            '</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:11:12 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subsidies to microbreweries challenged</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Australian craft brewers have asked the WTO to take action against countries that subsidise microbreweries. The ACCC is also said to be investigating is investigating tying practices which lock craft beers out of Australian hotels. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-24/craft-brewers-ask-for-action-in-fair-trade-dispute/5913796" target="_blank"> Steve Cannane and Sashka Koloff, 'Craft beer brewers take on domestic heavyweights in ACCC and WTO fair trade investigation' (ABC, 25 November  2014) </a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:10:41 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submission released</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The next batch of Harper Review submissions have been released and can be <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/non-confidential-submissions/" target="_blank">viewed here</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 13:10:17 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>No new submissions to the Harper Review have been published since the deadline for submissions passed on Monday - a few have trickled out online though. See, for example, <a href="http://www.anra.com.au/_literature_140803/ANRA_Submission_in_Response_to_the_Competition_Policy_Review_Draft_Report" target="_blank">ANRA submission</a>, <a href="http://www.acci.asn.au/getattachment/95626e65-9324-47ca-a83a-e4a505b7c95d/COMPETITION-POLICY-REVIEW--ACCI-Response-to-Draft-.aspx" target="_blank">ACCI submission</a>, <a href="http://www.copyright.org.au/admin/cms-acc1/_images/373193668546d357a95ea1.pdf" target="_blank">Australian Copyright Council</a>,<a href="http://www.choice.com.au/~/media/Files/News/Harper%20Review%20-%20CHOICE%20submission%20on%20Draft%20Report%202014-11-17.ashx" target="_blank"> CHOICE</a>, <a href="http://www.guild.org.au/docs/default-source/public-documents/news-and-events/media-releases/2014/pgoa-submission-to-competition-policy-review-draft-report-november-2014-fv.pdf" target="_blank">Pharmacy Guild of Australia submission</a> (a mere 123 pages) and <a href="http://www.vlga.org.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/Good%20Governance/2014/VLGA%202014.11.18%20Harper%20Review%20Draft%20Report%20response.pdf" target="_blank">Victorian Local Governance Association</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:09:57 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court upholds validity of Obeid notices</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Full Federal Court has upheld the validity of examination notices issued to Paul and Moses Obeid. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/full-federal-court-upholds-validity-of-examination-notices-issued-to-paul-and-moses-obeid-and-dismisses-appeal" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also Kat McClymont, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/eddie-obeids-sons-set-to-be-grilled-by-accc-20141120-11qcue.html" target="_blank">Eddie Obeid's sons set to be grilled by ACCC</a>' (SMH, 20 November 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:09:24 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More effects test commentary</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Woolworths chief executive Grant O'Brien has again warned against introducing an effects test for the misuse of market power prohibition, claiming it would create uncertainty which would chill investment. See Sue Mitchell, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/retail/woolworths-boss-grant-obrien-warns-effects-test-will-prove-negative-for-economy-20141119-11podc.html" target="_blank">Woolworths boss Grant O'Brien warns effects test will prove negative for economy</a>' (The Age, 19 November 2014). See also Katie Walsh, '<a href="http://www.farmweekly.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/big-retailers-warn-of-chill-to-competition/2717859.aspx" target="_blank">Big retailers warn of chill to competition</a>' (Farm Weekly, 20 November 2014). See also <a href="http://www.anra.com.au/_literature_140803/ANRA_Submission_in_Response_to_the_Competition_Policy_Review_Draft_Report" target="_blank">ANRA submission to Harper Review</a> (not yet published on the Harper Review website)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:08:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pharmacy Guild considers Harper deregulation proposal 'deeply flawed'</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>It comes as no surprise that the Pharmacy Guild of Australia has criticised the Harper Panel's proposal to remove restrictive pharmacy location and ownership rule. <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-draftrecs.html">Draft recommendation 52 </a>states, in part, 'that the Panel 'considers that the pharmacy ownership and location rules should be removed in the long term interests of consumers.'  See Christie Moffatt, '<a href="http://www.pharmacynews.com.au/news/latest-news/guild-analysis-finds-review-panel-recommendations" target="_blank">Guild analysis finds deregulation call ‘deeply flawed’</a>' (Pharmacy News, 19 November 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:08:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Wesfarmers' acquisition of The Workwear Group</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC will not oppose Wesfarmers’ proposed acquisition of Pacific Brands’ The Workwear Group. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-wesfarmers%E2%80%99-proposed-acquisition-of-pacific-brands%E2%80%99-the-workwear-group" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182910/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:07:44 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC launches secondary boycott action against </title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has  instituted proceedings against the CFMEU alleging 'it engaged, or attempted to engage, in secondary boycott conduct directed at Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd and Alsafe Premix Concrete Pty Ltd; contrary to the CCA.. See ACCC Media Release, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-court-action-against-the-cfmeu-alleging-secondary-boycott-and-undue-harassment-or-coercion" target="_blank">ACCC takes court action against the CFMEU alleging secondary boycott and undue harassment or coercion</a>' (20 November 2014) See also Michael Janda, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-20/accc-launches-court-action-against-cfmeu-for-boral-secondary-bo/5905688" target="_blank">ACCC launches court action against CFMEU for Boral secondary boycott</a>' (ABC News, 20 November 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:07:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Last day for Harper Submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Submissions on the <a href="reports/2014harper-draft.html">Harper Review's draft report</a> are due today. <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/submissions/" target="_blank">Click here to make a submission</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:12:24 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims and the NBN</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke today in Sydney about the NBN. See ACCC Press Release (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/nbn-presents-opportunities-for-future-broadband-competition" target="_blank">NBN presents opportunities for future broadband competition</a>) and the speech (<a href="http://accc.gov.au/speech/solving-the-multi-technology-puzzle-the-accc%E2%80%99s-perspective" target="_blank">Solving the multi-technology puzzle: The ACCC’s perspective</a>). See also, David Ramli, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/nbn-must-be-stripped-of-monopoly-power-says-accc-chairman-rod-sims-20141116-11nr0p.html" target="_blank">NBN must be stripped of monopoly power, says ACCC chairman Rod Sims</a> ' (SMH, 17 November 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:12:09 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First batch of Harper submissions focus on road tolls and trading hours</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The first batch of 128 non-confidential submissions on the Harper Review Draft Report were released yesterday. The vast majority are brief 'have your say' submissions and the majority of those oppose the imposition of road tolls (with most using near-identical wording and pointing to s 92 of the Constitution). The next most popular 'have your say' issue related to retail trading hours, with a significant number of these submissions opposing any extension to retail hours either because it would interfere with family time or because of concerns about the impact on smaller businesses. </p>
        <p>There were also several submissions from IGA stores - most adopting very similar (in some cases identical) wording - these typically focus on misuse of market power, access to justice, zoning restrictions and a supermarket code of conduct. There are a handful of more substantial submissions so far - these have typically focussed on misuse of market power (eg, Prof Stephen Corones, Frontier Economics (Dr Philip Williams) and Dr George Raitt). I have provided <a href="reports/2014harper-submissions2.html">brief overviews of most submissions here</a>. See also the official <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/non-confidential-submissions/" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review </a>website to view the submissions in full.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:35:18 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First batch of Harper draft report submissions now published</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The first batch of <a href="reports/2014harper-submissions2.html">128 non-confidential submissions</a> on the <a href="reports/2014harper-draft.html">draft Harper Report</a> has now been released. They can be <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/non-confidential-submissions/" target="_blank">viewed in full here</a>. Submissions may be made until 17 November 2014.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:35:02 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Competition Policy</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>ACCC Chairman, speaking at the Australian Farm Institute Conference in Melbourne today, has discussed the implications of competition policy for Australian agriculture, including commenting on the 'national champions' argument (expressing the view that promotion of national champions 'takes us in the opposite direction to reform that makes markets work better'), the misuse of market power provision and collective bargaining issues. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/the-future-of-competition-policy-and-its-implications-for-australian-agriculture" target="_blank">speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:33:53 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on Competition Policy</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims has addressed the RBB Economics Conference in Sydney backing competition reforms proposed by the Harper Review Panel - three points were highlighted: (1) need to make a choice about s 46 - clearly preferencing a change to an SLC approach; (2) need to extend the Act to cover more government activities; (3) need to debate and decide the issues around competition advocacy and market studies. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/the-need-to-champion-competition-in-australia" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://accc.gov.au/speech/bringing-more-economic-perspectives-to-competition-policy-and-law" target="_blank">speech</a>. See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-boss-rod-sims-pushes-for-powers-to-scrutinise-governments/story-e6frg9io-1227115178485" target="_blank">ACCC boss Rod Sims pushes for powers to scrutinise governments</a>' (The Australian, 7 November 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:31:30 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel on Telco competition</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, spoke to the Telecommunications Society in Sydney yesterday, focusing on competition in relation to content. Samuel also criticised several reviews into the industry, including the Vertigan and Scales reviews. See David Ramli, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/technology/ex_accc_chair_says_real_telco_battleground_YQOhfiQVNzr6JuW6OjvGYO" target="_blank">Ex-ACCC chair says real telco battleground is content</a>' (AFR, 5 November 2014),  John Durie, 'Graeme Samuel warns on threat of content control to competition' (The Australian, 5 November 2014), David Ramli, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/warnings-issued-over-telco-content-threat-20141105-11hc17.html" target="_blank">Warnings issued over telco content threat</a>' (SMH, 6 November 2014) and Graeme Philipson, '<a href="http://www.itwire.com/it-industry-news/telecoms-and-nbn/65978-graeme-samuel-unloads-on-scales-defends-telstra-and-says-content-is-king" target="_blank">Graeme Samuel unloads on Scales, defends Telstra and says content is king</a>' (IT Wire, 6 November 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:12:55 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deadline looming for Harper Review submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Submissions on the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-draft.html">draft report</a> are due by 17 November and the Secretariat has warned that this deadline (unlike that relating to the issues paper) is 'firm', noting that submissions received after this date may not be fully considered, particularly where they suggest significant deviation from the draft report.  For more details see the Review's <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/submissions/" target="_blank">submission page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:12:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues ACCount for September quarter</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has published its September 2014 quarterly report. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-acccount-for-september-quarter-2014" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/acccount/acccount-1-july-to-30-september-2014" target="_blank">report</a>.         </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:15:50 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC loses air cargo case against Air NZ and Garuda</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a 350+ page judgment, the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/1157.html" target="_blank">Federal Court has dismissed proceedings</a> against Air New Zealand and Garuda concerning alleged price fixing in relation to air cargo services; Justice Perram concluded that the conduct alleged did not take place in a 'market in Australia'. See, for example, ACCC, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-dismisses-air-cargo-cartel-proceedings-against-air-new-zealand-and-garuda-indonesia" target="_blank">Court dismisses air cargo cartel proceedings against Air New Zealand and Garuda Indonesia</a>' (Press Release, 31 October 2014), Steve Creedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/air-new-zealand-garuda-beat-accc-cargo-collusion-case/story-e6frg95x-1227108403643" target="_blank">Air New Zealand, Garuda beat ACCC cargo collusion case</a>' (The Australian, 31 October 2014) and Michael Roddan, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/10/31/aviation/court-throws-out-acccs-air-nz-case" target="_blank">Court throws out ACCC's Air NZ case</a>' (Business Spectator, 31 October 2014). For the judgment see: <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/1157.html" target="_blank">Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited [2014] FCA 1157</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:12:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allens Linklaters competition update</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The latest <em><a href="http://www.allens.com.au/pubs/comp/it30oct14.htm" target="_blank">In Touch: Competition Law update</a> </em>has been released by Allens  Linklaters.  This issue features a number of news items, including the ACCC's annual report, the recent conditional RPM authorisation, the ACCC Statement of Issues on the proposed Dux acquisition by Rheem, the ACCC's SOI on the CSR/Boral proposed JV and the penalties in the forklift gas supply cartel. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:11:14 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases annual report</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has released its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-aer-annual-report/accc-aer-annual-report-2013-14" target="_blank">annual report for 2013-2014</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/annual-report-highlights-effective-enforcement-by-accc" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:27:28 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow medical schools to continue streamlined admission/interview policies</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has 'issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179642/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to re-authorise policies which govern the selection and interviewing of applicants to study medicine at Australian graduate-entry medical schools'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-university-medical-schools-to-continue-streamlined-admission-and-interview-policies" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179642/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:27:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Tabcorp &amp; TAB's international pooling arrangements</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has issued a determination granting authorisation to Tabcorp, TAB and TAB ACT in relation to international pooling arrangements with overseas wagering operators and Premier Gateway International (PGI) (an intermediary hub) to allow for the transmission of bets by overseas punters into Tabcorp totalisator pools and the transmission of bets by Australian punters into overseas pools'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-authorises-tabcorp-tab%E2%80%99s-international-pooling-arrangements" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:26:56 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorised Racing &amp; Wagering WA's international pooling arrangements</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has ' issued a draft determination proposing to grant authorisation to Racing and Wagering Western Australia in relation to current and future pooling arrangements with overseas wagering operators to allow for the transmission of bets by Western Australian punters into overseas pools.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-authorise-racing-wagering-western-australia%E2%80%99s-international-pooling-arrangements" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:26:40 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Retailers in Canberra</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Large retailers met with politicians and regulators in Canberra yesterday - a bit of media on this: Eli Greenblat, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/retailers-lay-down-deregulation-gauntlet/story-fn91v9q3-1227104067924" target="_blank">Retailers lay down deregulation gauntlet</a>' (The Australian, 28 October 2014), Sue Mitchell and Matthew Knott, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/australian-national-retailers-association-condemns-harper-reviews-dangerous-competition-law-shakeup-20141027-11chpo.html" target="_blank">Australian National Retailers Association condemns Harper review's 'dangerous' competition law shake-up</a>' (SMH, 27 October 2014) and Joanna Heath, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/retailers_slam_harper_change_drafted_E4MwLm57z9hEu4X8Y7nIaP" target="_blank">Retailers slam Harper change 'drafted by lawyers'</a>' (The Australian Financial Review, 27 October 2014 (paper version 28 October 2014, page 9))</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:26:23 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Talks with retail giants in Canberra today</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Large retail bosses will meet with politicians and regulators in Canberra today to discuss deregulation and competition issues - see Eli Greenblat, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/retail-giants-take-fight-to-regulators-closeddoor-talks-with-government/story-e6frg8zx-1227102862848">Retail giants take fight to regulators: closed-door talks with government</a>' (The Australian, 27 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:26:19 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dymocks push for removal of parallel imports</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The AFR has an item on Dymocks' push for removal of parallel import bans - supported by recommendations in the draft Harper Report. See Sue Mitchell, Dymocks wants book shops on a parallel with Amazon' (The Australian Financial Review, 25 October 2014, page 36) (see SMH <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/dymocks-hails-new-chapter-in-2b-book-market-if-import-bans-scrapped-20141024-11b9po.html" target="_blank">version online</a>)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:25:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has an item outlining some of the issues discussed at the Competition Policy Review International Conference held in Canberra over the last two days. See John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harpers-health-complaint/story-e6frg9io-1227100277720" target="_blank">Harper's health complaint'</a> (24 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:25:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to probe Armidale petrol prices</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>See Lydia Roberts, '<a href="http://www.armidaleexpress.com.au/story/2648302/breaking-watchdog-to-probe-citys-fuel-prices/?cs=4054" target="_blank">Breaking: Watchdog to probe city's fuel prices</a>' (The Armidale Express, 24 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:25:03 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Gordon not impressed with lack of focus in ACCC case against Coles</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>In a directions hearing this morning <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/judges/gordon-michelle.html">Justice Gordon</a> has criticised the ACCC for lack of focus in its <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/casescurrent.html#coles2">unconscionable conduct claims against Coles</a>. Justice Gordon also questioned the need for Coles to use 17 junior lawyers to defend the case. See Eli Greenblat, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/judge-slams-lack-of-focus-in-accc-cases-against-coles/story-e6frg906-1227100808353" target="_blank">Judge slams lack of focus in ACCC cases against Coles</a>' (The Australian, 24 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:42:28 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$8.3 million forklift gas cartel fine</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The Federal Court has ordered (by consent) penalties of $8.3 million against Renegade Gas Pty Ltd, Speed-E-Gas (NSW) Pty Ltd and three current and former senior officers of the companies for engaging in cartel condut. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-orders-penalties-of-83-million-for-sydney-forklift-gas-cartel" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/1135.html" target="_blank">Read judgment</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:42:10 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expedia/Wotif deal faces NZ hurdle</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-expedia’s-proposed-acquisition-of-wotif" target="_blank">ACCC approved Expedia's acquisition</a> of Wotif on 2 October, but the deal now faces a NZ hurdle with the <a href="http://www.comcom.govt.nz/" target="_blank">Commerce Commission</a> issuing a letter of 'unresolved issues'. A decision is due on 5 November. See <a href="http://www.comcom.govt.nz/business-competition/mergers-and-acquisitions/clearances/clearances-register/detail/829" target="_blank">Clearances Register</a> (does not include letter) and <a href="http://www.wotifgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ASX303-22Oct14-WTF-Group-Acknowledges-NZCC-Continuing-Investigations.pdf" target="_blank">Wotif's ASX announcement</a>. See also Jamie Freed, 'Expedia's Wotif takeover held up again' (The Australian Financial Review, 23 October 2014, page 24 (<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/expedias-wotif-acquisition-delayed-again-20141022-119q7c.html" target="_blank">online version</a>)).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:18:15 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson on the agriculture green paper</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, has <a href="http://www.brucebillson.com.au/2014/10/23/speech-competition-policy-review-international-conference-canberra/" target="_blank">spoken at the Competition Policy Review International Conference in Canberra today</a>. John Durie has a piece in today's Australian noting that in that speech Billson stressed that it is the Harper Review, not the <a href="https://agriculturalcompetitiveness.dpmc.gov.au/key-documents" target="_blank">Agriculture Green Paper</a>, that is the 'key tool in setting competition policy'. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/bruce-billson-seeks-to-soothe-supermarkets-concerns-over-agriculture-green-paper/story-e6frg9io-1227099551421" target="_blank">Durie, 'Bruce Billson seeks to soothe supermarkets' concerns over agriculture green paper' (The Australian 23 October 2014)</a>. </p>
             <p>See also, for example, Fluer Anderson, '<a href="http://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/producers-in-power-push/2715358.aspx" target="_blank">Producers in Power Push</a>' (The Australian Financial Review, 20 October 2014, page 5), Fluer Anderson and Katie Walsh, 'Cold shoulder for carve-ups' (The Australian Financial Review, 22 October 2014, p 11), Editorial, 'Open economy is good for the farm' (Australian Financial Review, 21 October 2014, p 58), Lexi Metherell,  '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-20/agriculture-green-paper-to-spark-debate-over-water/5826928" target="_blank">Agriculture green paper to spark debate over water, competition</a>' (ABC Radio, The World Today, 20 October 2014) and Joe Kelly, '<a href="http://dynamicbusiness.com.au/news/green-paper-canvasses-court-orders-to-break-up-businesses-20102014.html" target="_blank">Green paper canvasses court orders to break up businesses' </a>(Dynamic Business, 20 October 2014). For more detail see also my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014agriculture.html">Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper page. </a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:35:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New publications</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The latest issue of the Competition and Consumer Law Journal is out now with a couple of competition items of interest: <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2014smith-markets.html">Rhonda L Smith, 'Market definition and substitution options'
</a> and <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2014raitt-mmp.html">George Raitt, 'Misuse of market power: Why policy objectives matter'</a>. Piper Alderman has also released their latest <a href="http://www.piperalderman.com.au/__files/f/6684/PB0025%201014.pdf" target="_blank">Competition and Consumer Law News</a> (October 2014) which includes items on section 155 Notices, Merger clearance proposals, the proposed (semi) effects test for s 46 and more.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:43:15 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gough Whitlam and competition law</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Malcolm Maiden had an item in today's SMH on Gough Whitlam's impact on competition law - see <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/gough-whitlam-changed-the-way-business-is-done-with-lasting-competition-laws-20141021-119a94.html" target="_blank">Malcolm Maiden, 'Gough Whitlam 'changed the way business is done' with lasting competition laws' (SMH, 21 October 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:42:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes first RPM authorisation</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D14+142802.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1182364&amp;trimFileName=D14+142802.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing conditional authorisation to Tooltechnic to set minimum retail prices on Festool power tools for three years. The ACCC has accepted that there is market failure caused by free riding of some Festool retailers in this case sufficient to justify authorisation. This represents the first ever application for authorisation for <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/rpm.html">RPM</a> conduct under the Act. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-conditionally-authorise-minimum-retail-prices-on-festool-power-tools" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179445/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. Submissions are due by 7 November. It is notable that the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper.html">Harper Review</a> has proposed retaining the per se ban on RPM, but introducing a notification option. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:04:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles v ACCC - balance between fair trading and competition</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Prof Caron Beaton-Wells has an opinion piece in today's Conversation discussing the ACCC's recent actions against Coles. See <a href="http://theconversation.com/coles-v-accc-finding-the-balance-between-fair-trading-and-competition-33135" target="_blank">Caron Beaton-Wells, 'Coles v ACCC: finding the balance between fair trading and competition' (The Conversation, 21 October 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:37:36 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Statement of Issues on proposed acquisition of Dux by Rheem</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+10923.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1182319&amp;trimFileName=MER14+10923.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining competition concerns relating to the proposed acquisition of the Dux hot water heater business by Rheem Australia. The ACCC has expressed concern that the proposed acquisition would substantially lessen competition 'in the supply of storage water heaters'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-acquisition-of-dux-by-rheem" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1180871/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:04:37 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises owner drivers to collectively bargain with Toll Transport </title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC 'has granted <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D14+140592.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1182302&amp;trimFileName=D14+140592.pdf" target="_blank">authorisation</a> allowing a group of small business owner drivers to collectively bargain with Toll Transport Pty Ltd for the supply of air freight courier transport services at the Toll Priority Brisbane depot.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-owner-drivers-to-collectively-bargain-with-toll-transport-at-brisbane-airport-depot" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178230/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:04:21 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Statement of Issues on CSR and Boral proposed clay brick JV</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has today released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+10855.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1182282&amp;trimFileName=MER14+10855.pdf" title="SOI CSR Boral" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining competition issues arising from the ACCC's review of the <a href="http://www.csr.com.au/Investor-Centre-and-News/News-Releases/Pages/CSR-and-Boral-propose-to-form-east-coast-bricks-JV.aspx" target="_blank">proposed CSR/Boral clay brick JV. </a>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated that: &quot;The proposed joint venture would result in a duopoly in eastern   Australia. The ACCC&rsquo;s preliminary view is that this would be likely to   lead to an increase in the price of clay bricks as well as a reduction   in the product range available to residential builders, architects, and   end-consumers&quot;. Submissions on the SOI are due by 6 November with a final decision to be announced on 18 December. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-csr-and-boral-proposed-clay-brick-joint-venture" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1164631/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See, for example, Tim Binsted, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-raises-concerns-about-boralcsr-brick-jv-20141016-116rr7.html" target="_blank">ACCC raises concerns about Boral-CSR brick JV</a>' (SMH, 16 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:04:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow new levy to combat oyster mortality syndrome</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a 'draft determination proposing to allow Australian Seafood Industries   (ASI) to collect a levy, in conjunction with hatcheries, on the purchase   of Pacific oyster spat.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-new-levy-to-combat-oyster-mortality-syndrome" title="oysters" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179959/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:03:35 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reauthorises Consumer Electronic Clearing System regulations</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[       <p>The ACCC has 're-authorised the certification, suspension and termination provisions of the Australian Payments Clearing Association’s (APCA) Consumer Electronic Clearing System (CECS) regulations.' See press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-reauthorises-consumer-electronic-clearing-system-certification-suspension-and-termination-regulations" target="_blank">release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179467/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:03:29 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts undertakings over restrictions on Taxi booking apps and mobile phones</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has accepted a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182245" target="_blank">court enforceable undertaking</a> from Standard White Cabs Limited, trading as Townsville Taxis, relating to alleged breaches of the competition provisions'. Part of the undertaking requires Townsville Taxis to ensure 'affiliated drivers are free to lawfully use a third party booking application and/or a mobile telephone to receive taxi bookings from customers'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-accepts-undertaking-over-restrictions-on-townsville-taxis-booking-apps-and-mobile-phones" target="_blank">media release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:55:47 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barnett attacks Rio and BHP </title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>WA Premier, Colin Barnett, has told the state Parliament that he thought it 'strange' that Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton were &quot;seemingly acting in a concert way&quot;. See AAP, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/barnett-lashes-rio-bhp-over-iron-ore/story-e6frg90f-1227090485674" target="_blank">Barnett says Rio, BHP likely colluders</a>' (The Australian, 14 October 2014) Ian Verrender, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-15/rio-tinto-bhp-billiton-iron-ore-strategy-crushes-colin-barnett/5815396" target="_blank">Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton iron ore strategy crushes Colin Barnett</a>' (ABC News, 14 October 2014). See also <a href="http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard/hansard.nsf/0/30AC00307B7E786A48257D71005B4E14/$File/A39%20S1%2020141014%20All.pdf" target="_blank">Hansard (Uncorrected Proof) pages 2-3</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:11:29 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telstra pricing</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There has been a bit in the media over the last couple of days about <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Telstra%20Submission%20to%20the%20fixed%20services%20FAD%20primary%20price%20terms%20Discussion%20Paper%20%28contains%20Appendix%201%29%20-%20Public%20Submission%20Document.PDF" target="_blank">Telstra's call to the ACCC to raise prices for access to copper</a>. See, for example, Supratim Adhikari, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/10/14/technology/greedy-telstra-will-test-acccs-resolve" title="Telstra" target="_blank">A &quot;greedy&quot; Telstra will test ACCC's resolve</a>' (Business Spectator, 14 October 2014) and Chris Ducket, '<a href="http://www.zdnet.com/nbn-causing-inevitable-copper-cost-increase-for-users-telstra-7000034574/" target="_blank">NBN causing inevitable copper cost increase for users: Telstra</a>' (ZDNet, 13 October 2014). See further ACCC Fixed line services FAD inquiry 2013 - <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/fixed-line-services/fixed-line-services-fad-inquiry-2013/consultation-on-primary-prices" target="_blank">Consultation on primary prices (July 2014)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:55:30 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abertis unhappy with ACCC decision on Qld Motorways-Transurban deal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Abertis CEO, Francisco Reynés has argued that <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1164122/fromItemId/751043" target="_blank">Transurban's purchase of Qld Motorways in April</a> gives it control of most of the east coast tollroads. See Jenny Wiggins, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/abertis-chief-lashes-accc-for-allowing-7b-queensland-motorwaystransurban-deal-20141015-1165zk.html" target="_blank">Abertis chief lashes ACCC for allowing $7b Queensland Motorways-Transurban deal</a>' (SMH, 15 October 2014). </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:55:16 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Allens >< Linklaters Competition Law Update]]></title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Allens &gt;&lt; Linklaters <em></em>latest <em><a href="http://www.allens.com.au/pubs/comp/it14oct14.htm" target="_blank">In touch: Competition law update is</a></em> now available, covering the Harper Review, ACCC immunity policy, NZ unfair contract terms draft guidelines, ACCC news, case news <em>ACCC v Breast Check; Zen Telecom; Pirovic Enterprises; Safe Breast Imaging Pty Ltd (No 2) </em>and ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:54:57 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Focus on electricity generation assets</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In a speech to Energy Users' Association of Australia, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has indicated the ACCC will focus on electricity generation assets when the privatisation of Qld electricity assets is triggered. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-focus-on-sale-of-queensland-electricity-assets" target="_blank">press release</a>. See speech - <a href="http://accc.gov.au/speech/carbon-mergers-and-other-issues" target="_blank">Sims, 'Carbon, mergers and other issues' (13 October 2014) Annual Energy Users' Association of Australia Conference, Melbourne</a>. See also Maggie Lu YueYan, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/10/13/dataroom/break-queensland-generators-accc" target="_blank">Break up Queensland generators: ACCC</a>' (Business Spectator, 13 October 2014) and Amy Remeikis, '<a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/tim-nicholls-looks-for-silver-lining-in-accc-comments-on-electricity-privatisation-20141013-115j59.html" title="QldPower" target="_blank">Tim Nicholls looks for silver lining in ACCC comments on electricity privatisation</a>' (Brisbane Times, 14 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:54:34 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel raises concerns on proposed ACCC board</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today's Weekend Australian (Business p 29) has a brief item noting that former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel has raised concerns about Harper Review draft proposals to add a Reserve Bank-style board to the ACCC. This followed concerns raised by current Chairman, Rod Sims, in his <a href="http://accc.gov.au/speech/university-of-south-australia-workshop-regulator-update" target="_blank">speech at the UniSA Competition and Consumer Law Workshop</a> in Adelaide yesterday. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/graeme-samuel-cool-on-accc-board-idea/story-e6frg8zx-1227086898560" target="_blank">Annabel Hepworth, 'Samuel cool on ACCC 'board'' (The Weekend Australian, 11 October 2014, Business 29) (online for subscribers only)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:54:14 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC initial comments on Harper Review</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke at today's UniSA Competition and Consumer Law Workshop in Adelaide. In part, Sims indicated in was pleasing that the panel had 'given the core elements of Australia's merger laws a stamp of approval' and that its recommendation regarding concerted practices responded to longstanding ACCC concerns of a gap in the law. Sims also welcomed the Panel's recommendations on misuse of market power. Concerns were raised about separating regulatory functions between different bodies and the recommendation to replace the current Commission with a differently composed Board. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-initial-comments-on-harper-review" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/speech/university-of-south-australia-workshop-regulator-update" target="_blank">full speech</a>.  See also Michael Roddan, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/accc-concerned-over-harper-competition-review/story-e6frg906-1227086133808" target="_blank">ACCC concerned over Harper competition review</a>' (Business Spectator, 10 October 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:53:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Convenience stores v supermarkets</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>SMH reports that <a href="http://www.aacs.org.au/" target="_blank">Australasian Association of Convenience Stores</a> chief executive, Jeff Rogot, has spoken about Coles and Woolworths growth strategies (in particular in relation to convenience stores) arguing that the ACCC must ensure convenience stores and small business aren't disadvantaged by such strategies. See Carolyn Cummins, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/convenience-stores-call-on-accc-to-keep-watch-as-supermarkets-plan-smaller-shops-20141010-114cet.html" target="_blank">Convenience stores call on ACCC to keep watch as supermarkets plan smaller shop</a>s' (SMH, 10 October 2014) and Carolyn Cummins and Julie-anne Sprague, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/property/woolworths-coles-to-take-on-convenience-stores-20141005-10qhgw.html" target="_blank">'Woolworths, Coles to take on convenience stores' </a>(SMH, 6 October  2014)        </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:53:37 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The State of Competition</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The latest <em>'The State of Competition</em>' is out now and focus on the Harper Panel's recommendations for s 46. In it, authors Rachel Trindade, Rhonda L Smith and Alexandra Merrett 'road-test
          the Harper proposal, trying it
          out with examples of allegedly
          anti-competitive conduct said
          to fall outside the scope of the
          current law.'  View the <a href="https://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_20_Harper_s46_effects_test_.pdf" target="_blank">latest <em>The State of Competition</em> ('Building better mousetraps: Harper’s re-write of section 46'</a>). See also <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank"><em>The State of Competition</em> homepage</a> for earlier issues.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:52:56 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC clears taxi co-op</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has &quot;allowed taxi   operators working in co-operatives in regional and country Victoria to   agree on the maximum fares they will charge taxi-users for work booked   within their cooperative network.&quot; See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-victorian-country-taxi-co-op-members-to-agree-booked-fares" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178317/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:52:30 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN oversight</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Allan Asher has a piece in today's <em>The Conversation </em>discussing NBN oversight and the recent Harper and Vertigan recommendations. See <a href="http://theconversation.com/why-handing-nbn-oversight-to-a-new-regulator-is-a-recipe-for-failure-32388" target="_blank">Allan Asher, 'Why handing NBN oversight to a new regulator is a recipe for failure' (The Conversation, 8 October 2014)</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:52:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No Woolworths liquor split</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has indicated it will not try to force Woolworths to divest assets to reduce market power (noting that it does not and should not have the power to break up companies). This follows a suggestion by former Woolworths and Coles executive, Tony Leon, suggested a forced liquor separation may be necessary. See, for example, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/accc-wont-hunt-woolworths-split/story-e6frg90f-1227080975865" target="_blank">ACCC won't hunt Woolworths split</a>' (The Australian, 6 October 2014) and Julie-Anne Sprague, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/competition_watchdog_won_call_for_1PsXBb3SxSkQ0FUoTmHbIM" target="_blank">Competition watchdog won't call for Woolies liquor split</a>' (AFR, 6 October 2014) and Julie-Anne Sprague, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/tony_leon_legend_with_deal_thirst_z9lXEE66DrAi8ZfCvzJaxO" target="_blank">Tony Leon, liquor legend with a thirst for a deal</a>' (AFR, 4 October 2014, p 35)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:51:55 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review a chance for economic leadership</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr Martyn Taylor has an item in the Australian Financial Review on the draft Harper recommendations. See Martyn Taylor, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/legal_affairs/harper_review_chance_for_economic_JRbUw7cJW1YJCIoaWp59XK" target="_blank">Harper review a chance for economic leadership</a>' (AFR, 3 October 2014) (alternate source: <a href="http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/news/121659/the-australian-financial-review-martyn-taylor" target="_blank">Norton Rose Fulbright website</a>)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:51:37 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>40 years of the TPA</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Trade Practices Act (still in force but re-named the Competition and Consumer Act 2010) celebrated its 40th anniversary on 1 October. The ACCC has released a commemorative magazine and 30-min video showcasing the history of the Act. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/celebration-40-years-of-making-markets-work" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
        <iframe width="360" height="203" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/xREALrVFreE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:51:09 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Expedia's proposed acquisition of Wotif</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today announced it would not oppose the proposed acquisition by Expedia of Wotif.com. This follows the release of a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+9510.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1182076&amp;trimFileName=MER14+9510.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> last month. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-expedia’s-proposed-acquisition-of-wotif" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182044/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also Matt O'Sullivan, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/accc-clears-expedia-takeover-of-wotif-20141002-10p01r.html" target="_blank">ACCC clears Expedia takeover of Wotif</a>' (The Age, 2 October 2014), Jamie Freed, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/accc_gives_green_light_to_expedia_Tqj1fVTtdHJYdJ51sFIKQJ" target="_blank">ACCC gives green light to $703m Expedia-Wotif deal</a>' (AFR, 2 October 2014) and Michael Roddan and AAP, '<a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/10/2/dataroom/accc-clears-expedias-wotif-takeover" target="_blank">ACCC clears Expedia's Wotif takeover</a>' (DataRoom, 2 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 13:50:35 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Criminal proceedings commenced for alleged failure to comply with 155 notice</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has commenced criminal proceedings against Mr Robert Paul Davies, alleging he aided and abetted the failure of Natural Food Vending to comply with a compulsory <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca155.html">s 155 notice</a> (relating to a consumer law issue). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-begins-criminal-prosecution-against-robert-paul-davies" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:47:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vertigan report released</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014nbn.html">Vertigan panel's report</a> (<a href="http://www.communications.gov.au/broadband/national_broadband_network/cost-benefit_analysis_and_review_of_regulation/nbn_market_and_regulation_report" target="_blank"><em>Markets and Regulatory Report</em></a>) was released last night. In part, the panel calls for the NBN to be split up and sold off (disaggregating NBN Co 'into competing business units using roughly equally matched technologies would provide the most effective platform for competition and innovation'). Communications Minister, M Turnbull MP, says no, 'now is not the time' - see preliminary government response: <a href="http://www.minister.communications.gov.au/malcolm_turnbull/news/vertigan_panel_lays_out_path_to_less_telecommunications_regulation#.VCyw1haCcyE" target="_blank">Malcolm Turnbull MP, 'Vertigan panel lays out path to less telecommunication regulation' (1 October 2014)</a>. See also <a href="http://www.minister.communications.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/56633/INDEPENDENT_COST-BENEFIT_ANALYSIS_and_REVIEW_OF_REGULATION.pdf" target="_blank">summary or principal conclusions</a>. For more media and related reports see my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014nbn.html" target="_blank">Vertigan report page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 12:00:56 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Expedia's proposed acquisition of Wotif</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC today announced it would not oppose the proposed acquisition by Expedia of Wotif.com. This follows the release of a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+9510.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1182076&amp;trimFileName=MER14+9510.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> last month. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-expedia%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-wotif" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182044/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also Matt O'Sullivan, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/accc-clears-expedia-takeover-of-wotif-20141002-10p01r.html" target="_blank">ACCC clears Expedia takeover of Wotif</a>' (The Age, 2 October 2014), Jamie Freed, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/accc_gives_green_light_to_expedia_Tqj1fVTtdHJYdJ51sFIKQJ" target="_blank">ACCC gives green light to $703m Expedia-Wotif deal</a>' (AFR, 2 October 2014) and Michael Roddan and AAP, '<a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/10/2/dataroom/accc-clears-expedias-wotif-takeover" target="_blank">ACCC clears Expedia's Wotif takeover</a>' (DataRoom, 2 October 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:58:47 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Reckitt Benckiser's proposed acquisition of K-Y brand</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose Reckitt Benckiser Brands Limited&rsquo;s proposed acquisition of the K-Y brand from Johnson &amp; Johnson'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-reckitt-benckiser%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-the-k-y-brand" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182033/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:58:34 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Tabcorp's proposed acquisition of ACTTAB</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose Tabcorp Group&rsquo;s (ASX: TAH) proposed acquisition of the ACTTAB business.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-tabcorp%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-acttab" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1182031/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:58:21 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC exempts Graincorp's Newcastle port terminal under new wheat code</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The ACCC has 'granted an exemption for GrainCorp&rsquo;s Carrington terminal at the Port of   Newcastle under the new mandatory Code on bulk wheat terminal access'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-exempts-graincorp%E2%80%99s-newcastle-port-terminal-under-new-wheat-code" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/wheat-export/graincorp-newcastle-exemption" target="_blank">exemption decision</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:58:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speaks on Grocery Code</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the Australian Food and Grocery Council’s Industry Leaders Forum in Canberra today. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/proposed-grocery-code-goes-some-way-to-addressing-unfair-practices" target="_blank">press release</a>. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/food-and-grocery-and-australia%E2%80%99s-competition-law" target="_blank">See speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:57:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper news</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been plenty of media on the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-draft.html">Harper Review's draft report</a> released last Monday - including two items in today's AFR: Kate Walsh, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/lawyers_see_green_light_for_mergers_dFAKF4Ft2tNXXuhwT93UdM" target="_blank">Lawyers see green light for mergers in Harper review</a>' (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, page 15) and an opinion piece by former Competition Minister, Craig Emerson: <a href="http://www.afr.com/p/opinion/there_are_ill_effects_in_an_effects_Uk4s1yfJK4t0hsR8MkzZfK" target="_blank">'There are ill-effects in an effects test' (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, p 58)</a>. For more links to media following the report, see my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-media.html">Harper media page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:57:29 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petrol retailers deny use of Informed Sources enabled them to engage in price fixing</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> In a directions hearing before Justice Bernard Murphy on Friday, petrol retailers denied that sharing of historical information via the Informed Sources website constituted price fixing or that it substantially lessened competiition.  See <a href="Petrol pumps deny website allows fixing">AAP, 'Petrol pumps deny website allows fixing' (Business Spectator, 26 September 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:57:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Wilmar and First Pacific's proposed acquisition of Goodman Fielder</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has announced that it will not oppose Wilmar and First Pacific’s proposed acquisition of Goodman Fielder Limited.' See press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-wilmar-and-first-pacifics-proposed-acquisition-of-goodman-fielder" target="_blank">release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1181893/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">public register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:56:53 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation day</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has granted interim authorisatins to <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-tabcorp-wagering-manager-ors" target="_blank">Tabcorp Wagering Manager &amp; Ors</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-racing-and-wagering-western-australia" target="_blank">Racing and Wagering Western Australia</a> and has authorised <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-authorises-melbourne-councils-to-undertake-joint-tendering-for-organic-waste-processing-services" target="_blank">Melbourne councils</a> to undertake joint tendering for organic waste processing services. See the ACCC's <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media/updates/exemptions" target="_blank">exemptions media page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:56:31 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on Harper Draft Report</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>There are plenty of media reports discussing the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014harper-draft.html">Harper Panel's Draft Report</a> - I am collating them on my <a href="reports/2014harper-media.html">Harper Media Page</a>. They include a couple of useful pieces by Alexandra Merrett -<a href="https://theconversation.com/big-business-market-power-and-why-we-need-more-test-cases-31968" target="_blank"> 'Big business, market power and why we need more test cases' (The Conversation, 23 September 2014)</a> and <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/9/22/australian-news/harpers-booster-shot-competition" target="_blank">'Harper's booster shot for competition' (Business Spectator, 23 September 2014)</a> - and a set of brief expert reactions on different aspects of the Report in The Conversation (<a href="https://theconversation.com/harper-competition-review-seeks-widespread-change-experts-react-31963" target="_blank">Harper competition review seeks widespread change: experts react (The Conversation, 22 September 2014))</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:48:19 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Plenty of recommendations</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There are plenty of recommendations in the Draft Harper Report on policy and law. In relation to Part IV, key recommendations include:</p>
             <ul>
               <li>simplify <strong>cartel</strong> provisions plus additional exemptions (rec 22)</li>
               <li>remove prohibition of <strong>exclusionary provisions</strong> in s 45/4D (rec 23)</li>
               <li>repeal <strong>price signalling provisions</strong>; extend s 45 to capture<strong> concerted practices</strong> (rec 24)</li>
               <li><strong>effects test for s 46</strong> (misuse of market power)</li>
               <li>no specific <strong>price discrimination</strong> provisions (general or international) (rec 26)</li>
               <li>simplify s 47 (<strong>exclusive dealing</strong>) and remove per se ban on<strong> third line forcing</strong> (rec's 27 and 28)</li>
               <li><strong>resale price maintenance</strong> to remain per se prohibited but with notification option</li>
               <li>no change to<strong> merger law</strong> (inc no creeping acquisition law) (rec 30)</li>
               <li>improve formal <strong>merger exemption process</strong> and combine with authorisation process with ACCC decision-maker at first instance (rec 30)</li>
               <li>retain <strong>secondary boycott</strong> prohibition but require ACCC to report on enforcement and extend jurisdiction to state and territory supreme courts (rec's 31 and 32)</li>
               <li>simplify <strong>authorisation and notification</strong> provisions (inc allow ACCC to grant exemption if satisfied <em>either </em>the conduct is unlikely to SLC <em>or </em>it will result in a net public benefit) (rec 34) and introduce block exemption power (rec 35)</li>
               <li>qualify obligations under <strong>s 155</strong> (rec 36)</li>
               <li>extend s 83 to apply to admissions of fact (facilitate <strong>private actions</strong>) (rec 37)</li>
               <li>extend CCA so that competition law provisions <strong>apply to Crown</strong> 'insofar as they undertake activity in trade or commerce' (rec 19)</li>
               <li>retain <strong>access regime</strong> but with modification - including that criterion (b) require it be uneconomical for anyone to develop another facility (rec 38 - further comment invited on aspects of Part IIIA)</li>
             </ul>
             <p>Commentary in the lead-up to the release of draft report suggested we wouldn't see much attention paid to the detail of the provisions in Part IV - the report is a pleasant surprise in that respect. Discussion of the legal provisions has not come at the expense of policy discussion or discussion about institutions and governance, which are also covered extensively in the report. See further the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/" target="_blank">draft report</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:47:47 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who said there would be no effects test recommendation?</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Reports over the last week that the Harper Draft Report would be unlikely to recommend an effects test for s 46 were about as far off the mark as you could get - recommendation calls for removal of 'taking advantage' and adding effect of SLC to the provision. See <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/" target="_blank">draft report</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:47:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Draft Report Released</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/draft-report/" target="_blank">draft report has now been released</a>. Each of the Panel members has also made a statement on the draft report. Submissions on the report are due 17 November 2014.</p>
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:47:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper draft report to recommend opening up health and education to business</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The AFR reports this morning that the draft Harper report, to be released today, will recommend opening more health and education to business, to relax local planning rules and to propose the ACC report on secondary boycott investigations. See Fluer Anderson, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/competition_review_to_open_up_health_eWIpOV509Xw0od42XN3GQJ" target="_blank">Competition review to open up health, education</a>' (AFR, 22 September 2014, page 4)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:46:56 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel - back seat for effects test</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, has indicated that detailed legal debate - including whether or not to introduce an effects test - is likely to take a back seat to broader economic reforms - see Jared Lynch, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/competition-effects-test-to-take-a-back-seat-says-samuel-20140921-10jzuc.html" target="_blank">'Competition effects test to take a back seat, says Samuel'</a> (SMH, 22 September 2014). The Panel's draft report is expected today.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:46:28 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No effects test recommendation likely</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Fairfax is reporting today that the introduction of an effects test will not be among the draft Harper recommendations expected on Monday. See Fleur Anderson, <a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/effects_test_for_competition_law_qZ3gQaAA5Yje5DYLejb43M" target="_blank">'&quot;Effects test&quot; for competition law put on hold</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 18 September 2014) (in paper version, Fluer Anderson, 'Competition law: 'effects test' on hold' (AFR, 18 September 2014, page 3))</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:24:48 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Coles' acquisition of three Supa IGA stores in WA</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of three Supa IGA supermarkets by Coles. The ACCC noted that in each of the relevant local markets 'there is at least one large competitive independent offer, in addition to Woolworths' supermarkets' and it was likely Aldi would enter some of the relevant markets in coming years. The ACCC also noted the potential for the Supa IGA stores to be closed without the acquisition. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-the-proposed-acquisition-of-three-supa-iga-stores-in-wa-by-coles" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1181744/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">public register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:57:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bloated competition laws</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>Allan Fels, Nicolas Taylor and Prudence Smith have an opinion piece in today's AFR discussing the Competition Policy Review - see Fels, Taylor and Smith, 'Trim our bloated competition laws' (Australian Financial Review, 16 September 2014, page 47)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:32:55 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on National Champions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As part of his <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/enhancing-competition-policy" target="_blank">LCA address</a>, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the recurring issue of national champions, claiming the current debate confuses the distinction between industrial and merger policy. See Jeff Whalley, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/global-cant-crush-local-says-competition-watchdog-chief/story-fni0dcne-1227058210820" target="_blank">Global can't crush local, says competition watchdog chief</a>' (Herald Sun, 14 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:56:54 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims' address to LCA</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The full address by ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, to the Law Council of Australia on Friday is now available on the ACCC's website. See Press Release, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/our-economy-needs-more-competition-on-its-merits" target="_blank">Our economy needs more competition on its merits</a>' (ACCC, 12 September 2014) and Rod Sims, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/enhancing-competition-policy" target="_blank">Enhancing competition policy</a>' (Speech to Law Council of Australia, Competition and Consumer Committee AGM, 12 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:56:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Locking rivals in change rooms</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, speaking to the LCA, has suggeted that the ACCC's proposed changes to s 46 are directed to addressing behavior akin to a football team with substantial market power locking a rival in their change rooms and 'seeking to win by default'. See '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/accc-boss-rod-sims-companies-locking-rivals-in-change-rooms/story-e6frflo9-1227056789915" target="_blank">ACCC boss Rod Sims: Companies locking rivals in change rooms</a>' (news.com.au, 13 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:56:23 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims misunderstood?</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Australian Financial Review today features several items on competition policy today. First, page one features an article by Michael Smith - '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/rod_sims_don_let_me_be_misunderstood_V7QlusO2TDPqDF5Tv5v2yH" target="_blank">Rod Sims: don't let me be misunderstood</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 12 September 2014, pages 1 and 4) highlighting Sims' claim that the ACCC's proposed changes to s 46 have been 'misinterpreted'. On page 36 you will find 'Competition Rules', featuring an interview with Rod Sims (Michael Smith, 'Competition Rules' (AFR, 12 Sept 2014, page 36). Finally there is an opinion piece from Rod Sims focussing on s 46 (Rod Sims, 'The ACCC wants to keep the playing field open as well as level' (AFR, 12 Sept 2014, page 39)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:56:06 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bowen attacks s 46 proposals</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[      <p>Former competition minister, Chris Bowen, addressed the National Press Club yesterday and took the opportunity to voice his opinion that the proposed effects test for s 46 may chill competition. See David Crowe, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/acccs-reform-plan-will-chill-market-forces-chris-bowen-warns/story-fn59niix-1227055835451" target="_blank">ACCC’s reform plan will chill market forces, Chris Bowen warns</a>' (The Australian, 12 September 2014). See also 'Labor backs big business in opposing effects test' (Australian Financial Review, 12 September 2014, page 4).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:55:43 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson labels big business juvenile over effects test</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The AFR is reporting that Small Business Minister, Bruce Billson, has labelled big business juvenile for suggesting the issues surrounding section 46 are 'black and white'. According to the AFR he also claims there is no suggestion an effects test would replace the current law requiring proof of intent to misuse market power (although if that is the case it is not at all clear what is being suggested). See Fluer Anderson, ''Effects test' to allow scrutiny of big firms' (Australian Financial Review, 11 September 2014) - for online versions see Fluer Anderson, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/big_business_juvenile_says_billson_atZZPnwTG90iKDV2KVDZTN" target="_blank">Big business 'juvenile', says Billson</a>' (AFR, 10 September 2014 - subscription required) and Fluer Anderson, '<a href="http://www.brw.com.au/p/business/bruce_business_minister_juvenile_5Vm6oO8Vc3VG7yqacNXgQI" target="_blank">Big business is 'juvenile' for opposing effects test: Small Business Minister Bruce Billson</a>' (BRW, 11 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:55:21 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson denies he's made up his mind on s 46</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Following the report in yesterday's Australian that <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/industrial-relations/cabinet-split-over-competition-laws/story-fn59noo3-1227053092413" target="_blank">Cabinet was split over competition laws</a>, Minister for Small Business, the Hon Bruce Billson, has denied that he has a fixed view on policy changes. See David Crowe, 'Minister <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/minister-warns-on-plan-to-toughen-laws-ahead-of-competition-review/story-e6frg8zx-1227054475598" target="_blank">warns on plan to toughen laws ahead of competition review</a>' (The Australian, 11 September 2014). John Durie also has a piece in today's Australian suggesting the s 46 debate is a distraction, suggesting the focus should shift to more substantial issues: John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/section-46-focus-is-a-distraction/story-e6frg9io-1227054940008" target="_blank">Section 46 focus is a distraction</a>' (The Australian, 11 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:55:02 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC gives nod to TPG</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not take action to prevent TPG implementing its plans to connect large apartment buildings in metro areas to its existing fibre networks (etc), concluding that it's planned rollout is permitted under the Telecommunications Act. The ACCC's investigation followed a complaint that the plans would breach the 'NBN level playing field' provisions in the Act. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-not-to-take-action-to-block-tpgs-fibre-to-the-basement-network-rollout" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also David Ramli, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/technology/accc_gives_tpg_nod_despite_nbn_co_Z9MvGHNIkTrxWx7jS9CwiO" target="_blank">ACCC gives TPG nod despite NBN Co's concerns</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 11 September 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:54:31 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases updated immunity policy</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has today published its updated <em><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-immunity-cooperation-policy-for-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">Immunity and Cooperation Policy for Cartel Conduct</a></em> (these replace the <em>ACCC Immunity Policy for Cartel Conduct July 2009</em> and ACCC <em>Immunity Policy Interpretation Guidelines July 2009</em>). This follows a review which commenced In May 2013 (including a public consultation from 30 September 2013 to 28 October 2013) and the release of a <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/draft-immunity-and-cooperation-policy/supporting_documents/DRAFT ACCC immunity and cooperation policy 09 April 2014 2.pdf" target="_blank">draft updated policy</a> on 9 April 2014. Key changes include implementing a two-step process for the CDPP to grant criminal cartel immunity, removing 'clear leader' as a disqualifying factor for immunity and consolidating various publications into one policy document plus a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-immunity-cooperation-policy-frequently-asked-questions" target="_blank">set of FAQs</a>. An updated <a href="http://www.cdpp.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Prosecution-Policy-of-the-Commonwealth.pdf" target="_blank">Annex B to the Prosecution Policy of the Commonwealth</a> was published yesterday. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/updated-immunity-policy-to-uncover-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:58:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises Victorian lottery agents to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has re-authorised the 'Lottery Agents Association of Victoria to collectively bargain on behalf of its members' for a period of ten years. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-re-authorises-victorian-lottery-agents-to-collectively-bargain" target="_blank">press release</a>.        </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:58:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cabinet split over competition law</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Australian reports today that cabinet ministers are at odds over potential changes to the competition laws. See David Crowe, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/industrial-relations/cabinet-split-over-competition-laws/story-fn59noo3-1227053092413" target="_blank">Cabinet split over competition laws</a>' (The Australian, 10 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:58:02 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prof Harper speech in Qld today</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[     <p>Prof Harper <a href="http://prwire.com.au/pr/46468/petrol-retailers-bring-competition-to-surfers-paradise-1" target="_blank">delivered a speech to the Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association</a> this morning - see Renee Viellaris, '<a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/supermarket-giants-cry-foul-as-small-business-pressures-accc-to-limit-coles-and-woolworths-duopoly-power/story-fnihsrf2-1227053078579?nk=b2081a461d36060162a09f86de4d98a7" target="_blank">Supermarket giants cry foul as small business pressures ACCC to limit Coles and Woolworths’ duopoly power</a>' (The Courier Mail, 10 September 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:57:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What to expect in Harper Draft Report</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie reports today that the Harper draft report (due 22 September) will be divided into three roughly even sections - competition policy, the law and institutions. See Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/ian-harpers-draft-report-will-look-at-competition-policy-the-law-and-institutions-like-the-accc/story-e6frg9io-1227051938955" target="_blank">Ian Harper's draft report will look at competition policy, the law and institutions like the ACCC</a>' (The Australian, 9 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:08:19 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie: Harper spotlight on ACCC</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>John Durie has an item about the Harper Review in today's Australian (John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-spotlight-to-shine-on-accc/story-e6frg9io-1227051455989" target="_blank">Harper spotlight to shine on ACCC</a>' (8 September 2014)) with a focus on merger review times. The article also notes that the review is expected to issue its draft report on September 22.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:08:03 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow Victorian country taxi co-op members to agree fares</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>The ACCC 'has proposed to allow Victorian regional and country taxi operators   working in co-operatives to agree on the maximum fares they will charge   within a network for three years.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-victorian-country-taxi-co-op-members-to-agree-fares-until-2017" target="_blank">news release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178317/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:07:43 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Two more Harper Review submissions released today - the BCA's second submission (earlier released on BCA website) and a brief submission from the Australian Diagnostic Imaging Association. All submissions can be downloaded from the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions/" title="Competition Policy Review submissions" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review website</a> and summaries of some (progressively added), including release date, can be found on <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html">my submissions page</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:12:24 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on Wotif/Expedia deal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Plenty of media following the release of the ACCC's <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+9510.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1181400&amp;trimFileName=MER14+9510.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues </a>raising concerns about Expedia's proposed acquisition of Wotif.com.  See, for example, Jamie Freed, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/competition-watchdog-raises-concerns-about-wotif-takeover-20140904-10c7ja.html" target="_blank">Competition watchdog raises concerns about Wotif takeover</a>' (Sydney Morning Herald, 4 September 2014), Mitchell Bingemann, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wotif-shares-dive-amid-acccs-takeover-fears/story-e6frg8zx-1227048172685#" target="_blank">Wotif shares dive amid ACCC’s takeover fears </a>' (The Australian, 5 September 2014), Tim Boreham, 'Watchdog knocks the stuffing out of Wotif' (The Australian, 5 September 2014), Tim Boreham, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/wotif-watchdogs-bite-worse-than-bark/story-e6frg9lo-1227047501279" target="_blank">Wotif watchdog's bite worse than bark?</a>' (The Australian, 4 September 2014), Mitchell Neems, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/9/4/paths-advantage/accc-further-probe-expedias-wotif-purchase" target="_blank">ACCC to further probe Expedia's Wotif purchase</a>' (Business Spectator, 4 September 2014) and '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/national/wotif-and-expedia-deal-warning-accc-says-hotels-could-be-slugged-more-for-online-listings/story-e6frfkp9-1227048181233" target="_blank">Wotif this deal drives up costs?</a>'
          (news.com.au, 4 September 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:00:45 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Statement of Issues on Expedia's proposed acquisition of Wotif</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+9510.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1181400&amp;trimFileName=MER14+9510.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining competition issues that have arisen from the ACCC's review of the proposed acquisition of Wotif.com by Expedia. See <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-acquisition-of-wotif-by-expedia" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179957/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also Mitchell Neems, 'ACCC to further probe Expedia's Wotif purchase' (The Australian, 4 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:00:28 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC clears Fairfax/AllHomes deal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-acquisition-of-all-homes-by-fairfax" target="_blank">ACCC will not oppose</a> Fairfax Media's proposed acquisition of All Homes.View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1181377/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See, for example, Mitchell Neems, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/accc-clears-fairfaxs-all-homes-buy/story-e6frg90f-1227047246400" target="_blank">ACCC clears Fairfax's All Homes buy</a>' (The Australian, 4 September 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:00:11 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BCA Supplementary submission</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>There has been much talk about the BCA's supplementary submission to the Competition Policy Review - it's not yet made its way to the Harper Review submission's page, but is available on the BCA's website. The submission focuses on three things: proposed changes to section 46, calls for the ACCC power to initiate its own market studies and the extension of the price signalling provisions. View <a href="http://www.bca.com.au/publications/submissions" target="_blank">Supplementary submission to the Competition Policy Review</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:35:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>King: Words Matter</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In response to the ACCC's <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2014/09/ACCC_4.pdf" target="_blank">most recent submission to the Harper Review</a>, Prof Stephen King has an item in today's 'The Conversation' addressing (again) his concerns about the ACCC's proposal to change our misuse of market power provision. See Stephen King, '<a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/opinions/king-2014words.html">Words matter. That's why the ACCC has got it wrong</a>' (The Conversation, 3 September 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:25:29 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Three more submissions were released late yesterday, including <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2014/09/ACCC_4.pdf" target="_blank">submission 4 from the ACCC</a> focussing on section 46 and the recent op ed by Graeme Samuel (although they somehow manage to spell his name incorrectly - 'Graham') and Stephen King and comments made by Richard Goyder.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:25:11 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Business concern about effects test</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The front page of today's Australian Financial Review features an article by Fleur Anderson ('<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/business_fights_tough_accc_rule_tMCp7jwrDJRAx86bhQfoEM" target="_blank">Business fights tough ACCC rule'</a> (AFR, 2 September 2014, pages 1 and 6)) discussing concerns expressed about the ACCC to introduce an effects test. See also ABC, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-02/business-council-takes-on-accc-over-competition/5713244?section=business" target="_blank">Business Council takes on ACCC over competition rules</a>' (Pat McGrath, The World Today)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:24:48 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation news day</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC proposes to authorise <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-authorise-joint-tendering-for-organic-waste-processing-services-by-mwmg-and-five-melbourne-councils" target="_blank">joint tendering for organic waste processing services</a> by Metro Waste Management Group (MWMG) on behalf of itself and five metro Melbourne councils, has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-authorise-tabcorp-tab%E2%80%99s-international-pooling-arrangements" target="_blank">draft determination proposing to authorise Tabcorp and TAB's international pooling arrangement</a>, proposes to <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-certification-suspension-and-termination-of-membership-provisions-consumer-electronic-clearing-system-rules" target="_blank">re-authorise certification, suspension and termination of membership provisions Consumer Electronic Clearing System (CECS</a>) rules and has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/update/accc-re-authorises-atm-sub-network-fee-free-agreement" target="_blank">re-authorised current and future FeeSmart Network members </a>to agree not to directly charge each other's cardholders for certain ATM transactions. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:45:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Fixing the fixers' - petrol pricing</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Conversation has just published an item by Caron Beaton-Wells and David Byrne on the ACCC's latest action against the petrol giants - see Caron Beaton-Wells, David Byrne, '<a href="http://theconversation.com/fixing-the-fixers-of-petrol-prices-is-no-easy-task-30907" target="_blank">Fixing the fixers of petrol prices is no easy task</a>' (The Conversation, 27 August 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:45:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mobil swears of Informed Sources</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Mobil Oil has pledged entered into an <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1180878" target="_blank">enforceable undertaking</a> with the ACCC not to subscribe to Informed Sources (or any other similar service) for the next five years. Informed Sources has noted that Mobil does not currently retail petrol in Australia and has no stated objective to do so; Mobil has not subscribed to Informed Sources since 2010 when it sold its retailing assets in Australia (7-Eleven currently runs Mobil branded stores - they are not operated by Mobil). The undertaking states, in part:</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>&quot;While Mobil Oil Australia does not accept that its previous subscription, or the subscription of others, to the Oil PriceWatch service had any adverse effect on competition n any relevant market in Australia, Mobil Oil Australia has voluntarily and without admission offered to provide this Undertaking to address the concerns raised by the ACCC.&quot;</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>See '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/mobil-swears-off-petrol-information-service-informed-sources-as-accc-federal-court-action-looms/story-fnkgdftz-1227037390237" target="_blank">Mobil swears off petrol information service Informed Sources as ACCC Federal Court action looms</a>' (news.com.au 26 August 2014) and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/mobil-undertakes-to-not-subscribe-to-petrol-price-information-sharing-services" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:44:49 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another six Harper Review submissions released</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>An additional six <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions/" target="_blank">Harper Review submissions</a> have been released today.  They include a third submission from the ACCC, a second submission from the LCA (SME Committee), NewsCorp and a submission from the Qld Competition Authority. See also my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranch.html">my review page</a> (including <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html">overviews of the first set of submissions</a> to the Review.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:44:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Entry</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:44:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Aquis' proposed acquisition of Reef Hotel Casino</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Aquis of the Reef Hotel Casino in Cairns. The informal review of the proposal commenced 9 April 2014 and a 
          Statement of Issues was released on 3 July - in the end the ACCC 'was satisfied that, if developed, the Aquis Resort will focus   primarily on international VIP customers because the size of its   proposed investment would require a much higher return than could be   obtained from non-VIP customers'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-aquis-proposed-acquisition-of-the-reef-hotel-casino" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1180781/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:43:36 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Informed Sources media</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Plenty of media on the ACCC's action against Informed Sources. See, for example, Lucille Keen, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/accc_sues_petrol_retailers_informed_LCU0D3hRUUbePenL0FacTO" target="_blank">ACCC sues petrol retailers, Informed Sources</a>' (Financial Review, 20 August 2014), Ben Butler, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-takes-action-on-petrol-pricing-20140820-106dpz.html" target="_blank">ACCC takes action on petrol pricing</a>' (Sydney Morning Herald, 21 August 2014), Annabel Hepworth, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/petrol-giants-face-legal-test-on-prices/story-e6frg8zx-1227031199197" target="_blank">Petrol giants face legal test on prices</a>' (The Australian, 21 August 2014) <a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/money/accc-takes-bp-caltex-woolworths-coles-express-7eleven-and-informed-sources-to-federal-court/story-fnagkbpv-1227030923571" target="_blank">ACCC takes BP, Caltex, Woolworths, Coles Express, 7-Eleven and Informed Sources to Federal Court</a>' (news.com.au, 20 August 2014), Michael Janda, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-20/accc-takes-action-over-alleged-petrol-price-sharing/5684168" target="_blank">ACCC launches legal action against Informed Sources and retailers over alleged petrol price sharing</a>' (ABC News, 21 August 2014) and Simon Thomsen, '<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com.au/competition-watchdog-takes-fuel-big-boys-to-court-over-alleged-price-fixing-2014-8" target="_blank">Competition Watchdog Takes Fuel Big Boys To Court Over Alleged Price Fixing</a>' (20 August 2014).</p>
        <p>Several press releases have also been issued by the respondents to the ACCC proceedings: see, for example, Informed Sources, '<a href="https://www.informedsources.com/media/14547/140820-press_release-the_accc_action_against_informed_sources_is_unjustified.pdf" target="_blank">The ACCC action against Informed Sources is unjustified</a>' (Media release, 20 August 2014), Woolworths Ltd, '<a href="http://www.woolworthslimited.com.au/page/The_Newsroom/Press_Releases/ACCC_and_Informed_Sources/" target="_blank">ACCC and Informed Sources</a>' (20 August 2014) and Caltex, '<a href="http://www.caltex.com.au/LatestNews/Pages/NewsItem.aspx?ID=13475" target="_blank">Caltex response to ACCC proceedings on fuel price data</a>' (20 August 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:16:38 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC takes action against Informed Sources</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has instituted proceedings against Informed Sources and several petrol retailers (BP, Caltex, Eureka (t/a Coles Express), Woolworths and 7-Eleven) alleging they contravened <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca45.html">s 45 of the Act</a> by entering into arrangements involving communication about prices which had the 'effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition in markets for the sale of petrol in Melbourne'. The matter is listed for a directions hearing on 26 September 2014. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-informed-sources-and-petrol-retailers-for-price-information-sharing" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:25:15 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>A further four <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions/" target="_blank">Harper Review submissions</a> were released on Friday, including a supplementary submission from the ACCC focussing on several merger issues.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:13:26 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Misuse of market power 'effects test' debate continues</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Former treasurer, Peter Costello, has weighed in on the public debate about an 'effects test' for section 46. At an Australian Retailers Association function Costello said he opposed an effects test 'designed to protect competitors, particularly less efficient ones, from a competitive challenge' (see '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/costello-backs-goyder-against-accc/story-e6frg90f-1227028575764" target="_blank">Costello backs Goyder against ACCC</a>' (The Australian, 18 August 2014) and Bridget Carter, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/effects-test-will-hurt-competition/story-e6frg8zx-1227028604798" target="_blank">&quot;Effects test&quot; will hurt competition</a>' (The Australian, 19 August 2014, p 25 Business) and Sue Mitchell, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/retail/peter-costello-buys-into-retail-debate-20140818-1059zo.html" target="_blank">Peter Costello buys into retail debate</a>' (The Age, 18 August 2014)). </p><p>See also Lucy Barbour, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-18/accc-effects-test/5678036" target="_blank">Competition watchdog ACCC head Rod Simms (sic) denies claims an 'effects test' would be 'economically dangerous</a>' (ABC Rural, 18 August 2014), in which the ACCC Chairman defends the ACCC's proposed effects test (and is also reported as saying that the current case against Coles was brought under the unconscionable conduct provisions rather than under s 46 because the misuse of market power prohibitions is a law that exists only between competitors ...)            </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:12:55 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC initiates price fixing action</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has instituted proceedings against OmniBlend Australia alleging it attempted to price fix with a competitor and that it 'induced a supplier to direct Omniblend's key competitor not to discount its prices for blenders' (RPM) - see <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-institutes-proceedings-against-omniblend-australia" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:28:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Section 46 in news again</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p><a href="experts/walker-jill.html">Jill Walker</a> and <a href="experts/featherston-roger.html">Roger Featherston</a> have hit backs at <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-13/economists-concerned-about-effects-test/5668004" target="_blank">comments by former ACCC Chairman, Prof Graeme Samuel</a>, who opposes a proposed 'effects test' for s 46, calling for 'real debate' on the issue, not 'scare mongering'. See Jill Walker and Roger Featherston, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/opinion/accc_section_change_is_not_anti_7zs81nrtQiLRUm5tMjpbNI" target="_blank">ACCC's section 46 change is not anti-competitive</a>' (The Australian Financial Review, 14 August 2014) (or for the paper version, Jill Walker and Roger Featherston, 'ACCC suggestion is far from novel and not anti-competitive' (AFR, 14 August 2014, page 55). See also Graeme Samuel and Stephen King, 'The effect of the ACCC's ambitions is dangerous' (AFR, 12 August 2014, page 47).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:19:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows Catholic health providers to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has granted authorisation to the Catholic Negotiating Alliance (CNA), a   network of nine hospital and aged care service providers, to   collectively negotiate with Funding Organisations (including private   health funds) and suppliers of various goods and services.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-catholic-health-providers-to-collectively-bargain-with-funding-organisations-and-suppliers" target="_blank">press release</a>.            </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:11:57 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise Qld liquor accord framework</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has issued a '<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1126167/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant conditional authorisation for local liquor accords operating in Queensland to adopt a pro-forma liquor accord developed by the Queensland Office of Liquor and Gaming (OLGR)' for five years. View <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-queensland-liquor-accord-framework" target="_blank">press release</a>.            </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:28:04 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to 'combat oyster mortality syndrome'</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has granted interim authorisation for Australian Seafood Industries   (ASI) to collect a levy, in conjunction with hatcheries, on the purchase   of Pacific oyster spat' which will enable ASI to undertake 'research into developing spat with resistance to the Pacific Oyster Mortality Syndrome (POMS)'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-new-levy-to-combat-oyster-mortality-syndrome" target="_blank">press release</a>.            </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:12:29 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper review submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>It appears the Competition Policy Review secretariat has stopped providing notice of new submissions to the review; since the last notice of 21 July there have been 12 more public submissions posted on the submission website (bringing the total to 301 public submissions). The site has also removed any reference to the date submissions were released (previously indicated with asterisks), other than to shade the very last batch released; the last batch were posted on 8 August and involved four submissions from  from Anonymous childcare, Asciano, the AER and a second submission from Jones Day.</p>
        <p>The other 8 submissions posted since 21 July were from <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2014/07/eBay.pdf" target="_blank">eBay</a>, Global Shippers' Forum, NSW Taxi Council, Recruitment and Consulting Services Association, Sigma Pharmaceuticals Ltd, The Industry Group, The Infrastructure Group and the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2014/07/US_FTC.pdf" target="_blank">United States Federal Trade Commission</a> (focus on misuse of market power , price signaling, and merger notification and review procedures). </p>
        <p> Submissions can be downloaded from the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions/" title="Competition Policy Review submissions" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review website</a> and summaries of some (progressively added), including release date, can be found on <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html">my submissions page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:07:06 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases June 2014 quarterly report</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has released its <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/acccount/acccount-1-april-to-30-june-2014" target="_blank">latest quarterly report</a>. The report notes that in the June 2014 quarter the ACCC was involved in 14 competition enforcement proceedings (13 carried over from previous quarter and one new action initiated against Aust Egg Corp Ltd). One court enforceable undertaking was accepted in the quarter relating to RPM. In relation to mergers 93 were pre-assessed, 10 were reviewed (four confidentially) and of these three were not opposed, two were opposed outright, three resolved through undertakings and in two confidential matters the ACCC has expressed concerns. One Statement of Issues (Elgas) was issued in the quarter. Some significant merger matters, including AGL, are highlighted in the report. In relation to authorisation and notification, the report notes that 16 final authorisation determinations were made in the quarter, 117 exclusive dealing notifications were lodged (none revoked) and one collective bargaining notification was received. The ACCC received 584 complaints relating to alleged anti-competitive practices (of these 125 related to allegations of misuse of market power). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-june-2014-quarterly-report" target="_blank">ACCC press release for an overview</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 22:27:26 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More 'effects test' discussion</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Lucy Barbour has an item in today's ABC Rural discussing concerns expressed by economists over the possible introduction of an effects test into s 46 of the Act. See Lucy Barbour, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-13/economists-concerned-about-effects-test/5668004" target="_blank">Push by farm lobby groups for 'effects test' in competition review leaves economists worried</a>' (ABC Rural, 13 August 2014). The article focusses on concerns raised by Prof Graeme Samuel over the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2014/06/NFF.pdf" target="_blank">National Farmers Federation's</a> proposed hybrid effects test.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:06:51 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Martyn Taylor on the competition review</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p><a href="experts/taylor-martyn.html">Dr Martyn Taylor</a> from Norton Rose Fulbright has an item discussing the current competition policy review. See Martyn Taylor, '<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a2f8c870-d9b1-4acf-9958-cac41f40adb9" target="_blank">Australia: the country may lead the world on competition reform - in Australia, a comprehensive reform of competition policy is taking place</a>' (Lexology, 11 August 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:06:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Joyce attacks ACCC again</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Barnaby Joyce has claimed the ACCC's treatment of the Murray Goulburn bid for WCB as a poor application of competition law. Joyce wants  to create 'national champions'. He also thinks retailers continuing to advertise milk at $1 per litre is BS. See Andrew White, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/warrnambool-cheese-butter-not-accc-at-its-finest-says-joyce/story-e6frg8zx-1227019777721#" target="_blank">Warrnambool Cheese &amp; Butter not ACCC at its finest, says Joyce</a>' (The Australian, 11 August 2014) and Damon Kitney, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/in-depth/dairy-producers-back-coles-and-woolies-on-1-milk/story-fni2wt8c-1227018506847" target="_blank">Dairy producers back Coles and Woolies on $1 milk</a>' (The Australian, 9 August 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:06:15 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>West Australian: ACCC asked to defer press release on power merger</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>According to today's West Australian, the ACCC was asked by WA Energy Minister, Mike Nahan, to defer a press release outlining competition concerns relating to the Verve/Synergy merger. See Daniel Mercer, '<a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/24678421/price-fear-over-power-merger/" target="_blank">Price fear over power merger</a>' (The West Australian, 11 August 2014) </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:05:53 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition and Consumer Law Journal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The August issue of the CCLJ is now available for subscribers.  There are four articles in this issue: David J Brennan, <em><a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2014brennan-parallel.html">Shifting shades of grey - International price discrimination
          and Australian copyright law</a></em>; Matthew E Taylor
          and Arlen Duke, <em><a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2014taylor-duke-parallel.html">Refocussing the parallel import debate</a></em>; Warwick Rothnie, <em><a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2014rothnie-tmparallel.html">Trade marks and parallel imports</a></em>and Rhonda L
          Smith and Arlen Duke, <em><a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2014smith-duke-agreements.html">Agreements and competition law in Australia</a></em>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:48:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Challenge to ACCC s 155 notices dismissed</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Federal Court has found that compulsory examination notices issued by the ACCC under <a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca155.html">s 155</a> to Paul and Moses Obeid are valid. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/839.html" target="_blank">reasons for judgment</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-upholds-validity-of-examination-notices-issued-to-paul-and-moses-obeid" target="_blank">ACCC Media Release</a>. See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/court-rejects-obeid-section-155-challenges/story-e6frg8zx-1227018288478" target="_blank">Court rejects Obeid section 155 challenges</a>' (The Australian, 8 August 2014) and Michaela Whitbourne, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/paul-and-moses-obeid-could-be-forced-to-give-evidence-on-alleged-cartel-20140808-1024rv.html" target="_blank">Paul and Moses Obeid could be forced to give evidence on alleged cartel</a> ' (SMH, 8 August 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:27:45 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper ABC interview</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The<a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/2014/08/07/transcript/" target="_blank"> transcript of an interview with Sheryle Bagwell on ABC Radio National</a> is now available from the Competition Policy Review website. In response to questioning about the recent Goyder/Sims stoush, Prof Harper stated (in part): '... we're certainly starting from the position that competition policy is about protecting the competitive process. ... we don't see that being a matter for contest.' Pressed on s 46 and the possibility of effects test, however, Prof Harper was (appropriately) giving nothing away ('I am taking advice from people right across the spectrum about this'). The interview also touches on the issue of competition in government-dominated sectors.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 16:49:28 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper speech to Small Business Summit</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>A <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/2014/08/08/speech/" target="_blank">speech</a> delivered by Competition Policy Review Chair, Prof Ian Harper, to the 12th National Small Business Summit yesterday, is now available on the Review's website.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 16:49:11 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>12th Annual Competition and Consumer Workshop</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>UniSA is once again hosting the Competition and Consumer workshop in Adelaide from 10-11 October. The Workshop will cover regulation updates from the UK, Australia, Singapore and New Zealand; small business; the Australian Competition Tribunal; dealing with the regulator; perspectives from Australian Federal Court judges; international judicial perspectives from New Zealand and Hong Kong; and the 'root and branch' review. The Workshop includes an impressive array of speakers and panelists, including two members of the current Competition Policy Review Panel (Prof Ian Harper and Michael O'Bryan QC). The Annual Workshop dinner will be held at the Adelaide Oval and feature after-dinner speaker Ben McDevitt AM, CEo of ASADA. Workshop registration is now open and closes 12 September. For further information, including the full program, visit the <a href="http://www.unisa.edu.au/Business/Law/Events/12th-Annual-Competition-and-Consumer-Workshop/Program/" target="_blank">Workshop homepage</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:23:38 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'War of words' on effects test</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has an item in today's Australian discussing Rod Sims' response to comments made by Wesfarmers' Richard Goyder to the <a href="http://www.npc.org.au/speakerarchive/richard-goyder-ao.html" target="_blank">press club earlier this week</a>, who expressed the view that it was 'ludicrous to contemplate introducing an effects test' into s 46 as proposed by the ACCC. See John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/goyder-misrepresenting-facts-says-sims/story-e6frg9io-1227015439473" target="_blank">Goyder &quot;misrepresenting facts&quot;, says Sims</a>' (The Australian, 6 August 2014). See also John Harper, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/b20-chairman-dont-blunt-our-competitive-edge/story-fni0dcne-1227014574132?nk=6895812efb5094ed95968ecb33d0d175" target="_blank">B20 chairman: Don't blunt our competitive edge'</a> (Herald Sun, 6 August 2014) and David Drowe, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wesfarmers-chief-richard-goyder-slams-ludicrous-consumer-laws/story-e6frg8zx-1227014614037" target="_blank">Wesfarmers chief Richard Goyder slams &quot;ludicrous&quot; consumer laws</a>' (The Australian, 6 August 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 08:58:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presentation by Prof Ian Harper</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Professor Ian Harper, Chair of the Competition Policy Review, delivered a presentation to the UNSW Competition Law and Policy Conference today. The presentation slides are available for download from the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/media/" target="_blank">CPR Media page</a>. The presentation highlights some of the issues raised by submissions to the review and notes that the panel 'will work through the issues raised, but will not adjudicate them' (noting Panel is 'looking at broad principles and institutional frameworks') and that a draft report is expected at the end of September - further submissions may be made in response to that draft report. See further <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranch.html" target="_blank">my Competition Policy Review Page</a> or the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/" target="_blank">official Competition Policy Review website</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 08:57:45 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State of Competition and private enforcement</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=a19845714e72d615771c64903&amp;id=168cf3d5ec&amp;e=866a69d6bf" target="_blank"><em>The State of Competition</em></a> has hit the virtual shelves today focussing on 'the public benefits of private litigation'. In this issue Alexandra Merrett and Rhonda Smith note the ACCC's apparent reluctance to litigate cases involving conduct subject to a competition test (providing some useful statistics). The authors go on to detail private actions in the past ten years, noting cases, outcomes and legal representation, before considering the reasons for such limited private enforcement (most notably cost and the absence of the s 155 powers enjoyed by the ACCC). The authors then consider the position in other jurisdictions (such as the US, where the prospect of treble damages has encouraged much more significant private litigation) before making some suggestions for improving the rate of private litigation. I particularly enjoyed this issue and commend it to you; see also <em><a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/newsletter-archive/" target="_blank">The State of Competition </a></em><a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/newsletter-archive/">archives</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:36:32 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims addresses Sydney Business Chamber CEO's Leadership Roundtable</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the Sydney Business Chamber CEO's Leadership Roundtable today detailing current ACCC priorities and noting (again) that a high number of 'in-depth' investigations are underway, most of which are confidential. The speech itself is not yet available. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-discusses-current-priorities" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:36:09 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC consultation on access prices for Telstra's fixed line and transmission services</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://accc.gov.au/system/files/FAD%20Inquiry%20-%20Primary%20Price%20Terms%20-%20Discussion%20Paper%20-%20July%202014.pdf" target="_blank">discussion paper</a> seeking views on 'setting primary prices for the regulated fixed line services supplied using Telstra&rsquo;s copper network'. Unusually, the government has urged the ACCC not to take Telstra's $11 billion NBN deal into account when making this determination (<a href="http://accc.gov.au/system/files/Letter%20to%20ACCC%20from%20Minister%20for%20Communications%20and%20Minister%20for%20Finance%20-%20FLS%20FAD%20Inquiry.pdf" target="_blank">letter from the Minister for Communications and Minister for Finance received by ACCC on 17 July 2014</a>). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-begins-consultation-on-setting-access-prices-for-telstras-fixed-line-services-and-transmission-services" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/communications/fixed-line-services/fixed-line-services-fad-inquiry-2013" target="_blank">ACCC project page</a>. See also Supratim Adhikari, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/accc-pushed-to-take-telstras-nbn-payments-off-table/story-e6frg90f-1227001442503" target="_blank">ACCC pushed to take Telstra's NBN payments off table</a>' (The Australian, 25 July 2014) and David Ramli, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/technology/government_urges_accc_to_ignore_w7TdzJambca8qwJHffiQKJ" target="_blank">Government urges ACCC to ignore Telstra's NBN deal</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 24 July 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:35:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not appeal AGL Tribunal decision</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not apply for judicial review of the <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2014agl.html">Tribunal's decision</a> to grant conditional authorisation for AGL's proposed acquisition of Macquarie generation. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-appeal-agl-tribunal-decision" target="_blank">press release</a>. See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-unlikely-to-block-agl-purchase/story-e6frg9io-1226996028286" target="_blank">ACCC unlikely to block AGL purchase</a>' (The Australian, 21 July 2014) and '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/accc-wont-appeal-aglmacquarie-generation-decision/story-e6frg9df-1226999670190" target="_blank">ACCC won't appeal AGL-Macquarie Generation decision</a>' (The Australian, 24 July 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:36:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC investigates Expedia, Wotif deal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has sent out <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+7893.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1180043&amp;trimFileName=MER14+7893.pdf" target="_blank">market inquiry letters</a> in relation to Expedia's proposed acquisition of Wotif.com Holdings Ltd.  The closing date for submissions is 6 August with a provision decision date of 4 September. The main area of competitive overlap identified in the letters is the 'retail supply of online accommodation booking services to consumers'. Overlap also includes online booking services for flights and other travel products. Specific issues for consideration relate to the relevant markets (eg, is there 'a market for the retail supply of accommodation which is separate from the supply of multiple travel products?' and the substitutability of bricks and mortar agents and direct booking channels) and competitive dynamics in the market (including how closely Expedia and Wotif compete with other online distributors of accommodation and barriers to entry). View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179957/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register </a>for further details. See also Jamie Freed, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-puts-wotif-expedia-deal-under-the-microscope-20140721-zvbvw.html" target="_blank">ACCC puts Wotif, Expedia deal under the microscope</a>' (Sydney Morning Herald, 21 July 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:14:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise owner driver collective bargaining with Toll</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178230/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> 'proposing to grant authorisation to owner driver members of the Transport   Workers&rsquo; Union in Queensland to engage in collective bargaining with   Toll for air freight courier transport services.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-owner-drivers-to-collectively-bargain-with-toll-0" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178230/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:14:20 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Even more Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Six more submissions released today - see official <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper-submissions/" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review submissions page</a>. This brings the total number of non-confidential submissions published to 289. See also my <a href="reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html" target="_blank">submissions overview page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:13:53 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate extension on s 46 divestiture bill</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Senate Economics Committee <a href="reports/2014mmp.html"><em>Inquiry into Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2014</em></a> has been given an extra six months to report (the original report date was 24 June, which was extended until 17 June - on Tuesday this was further extended to <strong>4 December 2014</strong>). The inquiry relates to a bill <a href="legislation/2014mmp-bill.html" target="_blank">introduced by Senator Nick Xenophon</a> which would provide the Court with  the power to order a corporation to reduce its market share,  where the corporation has been found to have contravened subsections 46(1) or  46(1AA) of the Act. A total of four submissions were received by the Committee (the Treasury submission is well worth reading to provide an overview of the issues relating to MMP divestiture and its application in other jurisdictions - often significantly misrepresented by those proposing divestiture powers in Australia).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:19:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN - Vertigan panel report</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.communications.gov.au/broadband/national_broadband_network/cost-benefit_analysis_and_review_of_regulation/panel_reports_to_government" target="_blank">Vertigan panel's first report</a>, tabled in Parliament today, concludes that </p>
            <blockquote>
              <p>'the broad framework should be retained largely unchanged for the time being but with some important modifications. The recommended modifications deal mostly with NBN Co's non-discrimination obligations, regulatory recourse to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) in relation to an NBN Co access agreement and oversight of regulatory decision-making' (page 6). </p>
            </blockquote>
            <p>The report ('Independent cost-benefit analysis of broadband and review of regulation'), which runs to 97 pages and makes 34 recommendations, deals with <a href="reports/2014nbn.html#tor">terms of reference item 2a</a> which satisfies the statutory review required by <a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca152EOA.html">section 152EOA of the CCA.</a> A separate report will be produced dealing with the other terms of reference. </p>
            <p>See The Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP, '<a href="http://www.minister.communications.gov.au/malcolm_turnbull/news/vertigan_panelas_first_report_released#.U8cGsbHyQyE" target="_blank">Vertigan Panel's First Report Released</a>' (Press Release, 16 July 2014) See further David Ramli, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/regulate_the_accc_says_nbn_review_AXBctLu0hJt1X7OvQlJVBO" target="_blank">Regulate the ACCC, says NBN review panel</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 16 July 2014) and Supratim Adhikari, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/7/16/technology/accc-needs-be-regulated-vertigan-panel" target="_blank">ACCC needs to be regulated: Vertigan panel</a>' (Business Spectator, 16 July 2014). See also <a href="reports/2014nbn.html">my review home page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:10:17 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merrett on Competitive Neutrality</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Alexandra Merrett has a pice in today's <em>The Conversation </em>on competitive neutrality. See <a href="opinions/merrett-2014neutrality.html">Alexandra Merrett, 'Government Inc: time to revisit competitive neutrality' (The Conversation, 14 July 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:07:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>11 more submissions released today - see official <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper-submissions/" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review submissions page</a>. This brings the total number of non-confidential submissions published to 283. See also my <a href="reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html" target="_blank">submissions overview page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:07:26 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel laws and whistleblowers</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>There is an item in today's Financial Review on cartels and the immunity process: see Hannah Low, 'Cartel laws 'fail whistleblowers' (Australian Financial Review, 11 July 2014, page 32)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:07:06 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statement of Issues on Coles' proposed acquisition of IGA stores</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+7475.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1179827&amp;trimFileName=MER14+7475.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> highlighting concerns about Coles' proposed acquisition of four Progressive Supa IGA stores in WA. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-proposed-acquisition-of-supa-iga-stores-in-wa-by-coles" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1168256/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. Closing date for submissions is 17 July. See also Chris Kohler, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/7/10/food-and-beverages/accc-warns-coles-iga-purchases" target="_blank">ACCC warns on Coles' IGA purchases</a>' (Business Spectator, 10 July 2014) and Stuart McKinnon, '<a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/business/wa/a/24427654/accc-worried-by-iga-store-sale/" target="_blank">ACCC worried by IGA store sale</a>' (The West Australian, 10 July 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:07:03 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition concerns in online property sector</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p><em>The Australian </em>reports that the ACCC is assessing competition complaints relating to the online property sector. See Darren Davidson, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-eyeing-property-site-row/story-e6frg8zx-1226983501751" target="_blank">ACCC eyeing property site row</a>' (The Australian, 10 July 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:06:26 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Harper submissions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>A further 36 submissions to the Harper Review have been released today. They include submissions from the, the American bar Association, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Australian Corporate Lawyers Association, the Business Council of Australia, Prof Allan Fels, Foxtel, the IBA (Antitrust Committee) and the Law Council of Australia (Business Law Section). The Chair of the Review, Prof Harper, has also released a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSzEPla7k88&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">video about  what the Competition Policy Review has heard from stakeholders</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:06:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes authorisation for Perth councils joint waste tender</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has released a draft determination 'proposing to grant authorisation for the Cities of Wanneroo, Joondalup and Swan to jointly tender and enter into contracts for the supply of services to process dry commingled recyclables collected by them through their yellow lid kerbside collection service'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-perth-councils-for-joint-waste-tender" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178707/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:05:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reauthorises brick levy</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has granted 'authorisation to the Australian Brick & Blocklaying Training Foundation (ABBTF), Think Brick Australia and the Concrete Masonry Association of Australia to continue to apply a small levy on the sale of clay brick and concrete masonry products.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-reauthorises-brick-levy-to-help-with-bricklayer-shortage" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1170383/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:05:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Aquis' proposed acquisition of Reef Hotel Casino</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D14+87399.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1179635&amp;trimFileName=D14+87399.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining concerns with the proposed acquisition by Aquis Reef Holdings of the Reef Hotel Casino in Cairns. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-aquis-proposed-acquisition-of-the-reef-hotel-casino" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1167073/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:05:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State of Competition</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Issue 18 of <a href="http://www.thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a> is out now - this time Rhonda Smith and Alexandra Merrett tackle the cellophane fallacy and the Cement Australia case: see <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.us5.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=a19845714e72d615771c64903&amp;id=b5a1155119&amp;e=866a69d6bf" target="_blank">'Unwrapping a fallacy: market definition, market power &amp; cellophane' (June 2014)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:04:45 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scrap price signalling laws</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A bit of media on price signalling laws and the Harper Review. First John Durie's '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/call-to-scrap-laws-on-price-signalling/story-e6frg8zx-1226971374590?sv=e9142395113d44d7ace6d2c7e82fb962#" target="_blank">Call to scrap laws on price signalling</a>' discusses several submissions to the Harper Review, covering a range of issues, including price signalling. Next, David Ramli discusses Telstra's calls to remove price signalling rules: David Ramli, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/telstra_calls_to_say_no_to_price_xhifEK6ilJ9OodpaR3v07M" target="_blank">Telstra calls to say no to price signalling laws</a>' (The Australian Financial Review, 30 June 2014) and then comes the ACCC's opposition to the Telstra's opposition in David Ramli's '<a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/retail/accc-hits-back-at-telstra-20140630-zsqqp.html" target="_blank">ACCC hits back at Telstra</a>' (Brisbane Times, 30 June 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:03:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More submissions to Harper released</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>A further 76 submissions to the Harper Review have been released today. This brings the total non-confidential submissions released to 236.  The submissions page on the Review website has also changed again - <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions20140627/" target="_blank">submissions can be viewed here</a>. My overview of submissions (other than the 76 just released) can be found on <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html">my Harper Review page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:08:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition key to productivity</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>Dave Poddar has an opinion piece in today's AFR. See Dave Poddar, 'Competition holds key to productivity' (The Australian Financial Review, 27 June 2014, page 42). See also Alan Mitchell, 'Abbott must promote competition' (The Australian Financial Review, 25 June 2014, page 42)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:07:58 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal's decision now available</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The decision of the Australian Competition Tribunal (Justice Mansfield, Mr Latta and Prof Round) is now available: view <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2014/2014acompt0001" target="_blank"> Application for Authorisation of Acquisition of Macquarie Generation by AGL Energy Limited [2014] ACompT 1</a> (the Word document is a 5MB download and the decision runs to 117 pages)            </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:49:23 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal authorises AGL acquisition of MacGen</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The Australian Competition Tribunal has granted conditional authorisation for AGL's proposed acquisition of Macquarie Generation. The decision is not yet available on the Tribunal page. The ACCC has expressed disappointment at the decision, believing the proposed acquisition will have significant implications for competition in electricity markets. See also Maggie Lu Yueyang, 'Regulator overturns ban on AGL's MacGen buy' (Business Spectator, 25 June 2014), Anthony Klan and Andrew White, 'Watchdog warns of energy price rise as AGL deal gets nod' (The Australian, 26 June 2014) and John Durie, 'Panel's decision a huge blow to Sims' (The Australian, 26 June 2014)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:58:49 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC submission to Harper Review</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[         <p>The <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Harper%20Review%20-%20Issues%20Paper%20-%20ACCC%20Submission%20-%20FINAL%20%28for%20website%29%20-%2025%20June%202014%20%282%29.pdf" target="_blank">ACCC has released its submission to the Harper Review</a> ('Reinvigorating Australia's Competition Policy'). Key recommendations relate to misuse of market power (advocates effects test) and price signalling (advocates expansion). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/reinvigorating-australias-competition-policy-accc-submission-to-harper-review" target="_blank">press release</a>. A full list of published submissions is available from the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions20140620/" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review site</a>. I am also in the process of summarising submissions and issues discussed on <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html">my Harper Review page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:57:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speaks to CEDA Conference</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[      <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has spoken (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/the-need-to-elevate-competition-in-our-public-policy" target="_blank">view speech</a>) at the CEA State of the Nation Conference in Canberra today on the opportunity provided by the Harper Review to 'reinvigorate Australia's competition culture. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/reinvigorate-our-competition-culture-says-accc-chairman" target="_blank">ACCC, 'Reinvigorate our competition culture says ACCC Chairman' (Press Release, 23 June 2014)</a>. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/the-need-to-elevate-competition-in-our-public-policy" target="_blank"></a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:03:48 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>26 more submissions to Harper</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>A further 26 submissions have been released on the Harper Review website (somewhat unhelpfully this has also changed the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions20140620/" target="_blank">link to the submissions</a>). More are expected next week, including those from BCA, ACCC and ASIC.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:00:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No stay of orders for Flight Centre</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Flight Centre has unsuccessfully attempted to stay orders for payment of $11 fine imposed by the Court in March (see <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2013flightcentre.html">judgment</a>). Justice Rangiah: see <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2014/2014fca0658" target="_blank">Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2014] FCA 658</a>. Justice Rangiah noted that the 'assumption that the Court should not deprive a litigant of the benefit of a judgment is not relevant where a stay is sought of an order imposing a pecuniary penalty' (para 10) because a pecuniary penalty order is not a 'benefit' tot he ACCC, but rather has the primary object of deterrence. However, Rangiah J rejected the 'proposition that the mere commencement of an appeal against an order imposing apecuniary penalty is, in the absence of prejudice to the respondent, enough to warrant a stay of the order pending the appeal.' (para 14) His Honour concluded: 'The mere fact that Flight Centre was required to pay the pecuniary penalty in accordance with the order made by the primary judge was not enough, in my opinion, to warrant a stay. The position might have been different if Flight Centre had alleged and demonstrated some particular prejudice or difficulty in complying with the orders. It did not.' (para 19)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:48:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taxi driver authorisation</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has temporarily allowed Victorian country taxi operaters to work in co-operatives to enable them to 'agree the maximum prices for their cooperative network when state pricing laws change from 30 June'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-permits-victorian-country-taxi-co-ops-to-agree-prices-in-the-short-term" target="_blank">'ACCC permits Victorian country taxi co-ops to agree prices in the short term' (ACCC Press Release, 19 June 2014)</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178317/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:03:32 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes authorisation for coal producers</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has proposed to grant authorisation for Rio Tinto, Peabody and Pacific National to coordinate transportation of coal in the Goonyella Coal Chain'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-coal-producers-to-coordinate-transportation" target="_blank">ACCC Press release</a>.  View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1144508/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:03:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AFR - 'Hilmer Review Part 2'</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Today's AFR has an item on the Harper Review - Nassim Khadem, 'Hilmer review part 2' (The Australian Financial Review, 18 June 2014, p 40). Notes that many of the submissions to the review focus on protecting competitors not competition. However, notes many key submissions are not yet in - including BCA, ACCC, ASIC and state governments and agencies who have until June 27 to make submissions. The current <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions/" target="_blank">134 submissions can be viewed here</a>. I have also created a <a href="reports/2014rootbranchSubmissions.html">table detailing the submissions here</a> - a surprising number focus on secondary boycott exemptions!</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:00:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to reauthorise lottery collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC 'has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178171/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to reauthorise the Lottery Agents Association of Victoria to collectively bargain on behalf of its members with Victorian lotteries providers for ten years'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-reauthorise-collective-bargaining-by-victorian-lottery-agents" target="_blank">press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:02:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows Melbourne councils to jointly tender for organic waste services</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has granted authorisation for Metropolitan Melbourne Waste Management Group and eight metropolitan Melbourne councils to jointly tender and enter into contracts for the supply of organic waste processing services.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-melbourne-councils-for-joint-organic-waste-tender" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1153687/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:01:40 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorisation for construction of affordable housing</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[     <p>The ACCC has granted authorisation for 'Renewal SA to sell a section of a development site in Bowden, South Australia to Investec' - the arrangement will see Renewal and Investec setting maximum rental prices and minimum sales prices and 'apply restrictive criteria for eligible participants. The ACCC consider the arrangement 'may increase the amount of affordable housing available to those people   who cannot access social housing or are excluded from the general   housing market in metropolitan Adelaide'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-for-construction-of-affordable-housing" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1153685/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:01:19 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to reauthorise ATM sub-network fee free agreement</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[     <p>The ACCC has proposed 'to reauthorise an agreement between members of the FeeSmart ATM   sub-network to not charge each other&rsquo;s cardholders a fee for   transactions at ATMs owned by members'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-reauthorise-atm-sub-network-fee-free-agreement" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178382/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:00:31 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper submissions available</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The first 143 non-confidential submissions made to the <a href="reports/2014rootbranch.html">Harper Review</a> are now available from the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/issues-paper/submissions/" target="_blank">Review website</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:59:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes Healthscope acquisition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC will oppose the proposed acquisition by Healthscope Ltd of the Brunswick Private Hospital. ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, said that the 'proposed acquisition would result in Healthscope acquiring its closest and most significant competitor for the supply of private rehabilitation services in northern Melbourne' and removal of the Brunswick Private Hospital as an independent competitor 'would be likely to result in a substantial lessening of competition'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-opposes-healthscopes-proposed-acquisition-of-brunswick-private-hospital" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1179110/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. A public competition assessment is expected ... eventually.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:57:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Submissions to Harper Review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Submissions to the Harper Review were due yesterday. They are not yet available on the <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/" target="_blank">review website</a> but have been promised soon. In the meantime, some organisations have published their submissions, including CHOICE - their submission can be found <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/%7E/media/Files/SUBMISSIONS%20AND%20REPORTS/July%202011%20onwards/CHOICE%20Submission%20to%20Competition%20Policy%20Review.ashx" target="_blank">here</a>. It makes 26 recommendations, including either removing price signalling laws or applying them universally (recommendation 17), conducting regular independent reviews of ACCC merger decisions (recommendation 15), giving consideration to simplifying competition laws and processes (recommendation 16), repealing s 51(3) of the Act (axing the 'Australia tax') (recommendation 3) and, generally, recommending that any future policy reform agenda 'prioritise consumer welfare as its overarching objective' (recommendation 1). See further, <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/media-and-news/consumer-news/news/time-to-axe-the-australia-tax-110614.aspx" target="_blank">CHOICE, 'Time to axe the 'Australia tax'' (11 June 2014)</a>. <a href="http://www.abl.com.au/ablattach/ablsubmission100614.pdf" target="_blank">Arnold Bloch Leibler </a> and <a href="http://www.masterbuilders.com.au/informationsheets/submission-on-anti-competitive-effects-of-regulation" target="_blank">Master Builders Australia </a>have also published their submissions. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:56:49 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation for plant breeders collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has authorised 'royalty managers for plant breeders to collectively negotiate with the   grain buyers they engage to collect royalties on their behalf.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-plant-breeders-collective-bargaining-arrangements" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1131763/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register.</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:56:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New AJCCL</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/2014/05/30/australian-journal-of-competition-and-consumer-law-update-june-2014/">Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law</a> (Volume 22 Part 2, June 2014) was released recently and includes the following articles and notes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Graeme Samuel AO - A tribute to Ron Bannerman, the father of Australian competition law 
<li>Mark Lewis - Supermarket private labels: Consumer dream or nightmare in disguise? 
<li>James Laman and Marina Nehme - Section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act: The need for change 
<li>Hank Spier - Politics and the administration of the Australian competition and consumer law 
<li>John Hedge and Rowan Kendall - Access to Services - Productivity Commission’s final report on the national access regime produces more prickly issues for the root and branch review 
<li>Case Notes (ACCC v Cement Australia Pty Ltd and ACCC v Flight Centre Ltd) 
<li>Alex Sundakov, Economic(s) Matters - What is the magic of market definition? 
<li>Debra Wilson, Report from New Zealand - Reflecting on cardboard boxes and air cargo: The latest New Zealand cartel cases reach conclusion </li></li></li></li></li></li></li></li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:56:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on Competition Review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has an item in today's Australian regarding the Harper Review (first round of submissions due today).  In it he outlines 'three key areas' of focus identified by Harper in an interview with the Australian. See John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/three-key-areas-to-help-firms-compete/story-e6frg9io-1226948710116#" target="_blank">Three key areas to help firms compete</a>' (The Australian, 10 June 2014, page 17)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:04:09 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Air cargo cartel settlement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The Federal Court has approved a $38m settlement in in a class action suit against the air cargo cartel. See Maurice Blackburn, '<a href="http://www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/news/press-releases-announcements/2014/australia%E2%80%99s-fourth-cartel-class-action-settles-today-for-$38-million.aspx" target="_blank">Australia's fourth cartel class action settles today for $38m</a>'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:03:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Challenge to section 155 notice</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Moses and Paul Obeid have filed an application (NSD490/2014) in the Federal Court challenging s 155 notices issued to them by the ACCC as part of the ACCC's investigation into alleged cartel conduct relating to the 2009 tender process for an exploration mining licence over the Mount Penny coal tenement in the Bylong Valley. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/moses-and-paul-obeid-issue-court-challenge-to-accc-examination-notices-0" target="_blank"> press release</a>. The application was filed on 20 May and heard before Justice Farrell on 6 June. Judgment has been reserved. Plenty of media. See, for example, Michaela Whitbourne, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/accc-investigates-moses-obeid-and-paul-obeid-for-cartel-conduct-over-coal-deal-20140606-zrzhh.html" target="_blank">ACCC investigates Moses Obeid and Paul Obeid for cartel conduct over coal deal</a>' (SMH, 6 June 2014). AAP, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/obeid-lawyers-try-to-halt-accc-probe/story-e6frg6nf-1226945642564" target="_blank">Obeid lawyers try to halt ACCC probe</a>' (The Australian, 6 June 2014) and John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/obeids-test-case-rich-in-irony/story-e6frg9io-1226945676210#" target="_blank">Obeids test case rich in irony</a>' (The Australian, 6 June 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:03:31 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC conditionally reauthorises APRA arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has reauthorised the Australasian Performing Right Association’s (APRA) arrangements for the acquisition and licensing of performing rights in music, subject to certain conditions', including requiring APRA to 'produce a comprehensive plain English guide to its licences, as well as a guide that increases awareness of the licence back and opt out provisions' and 'to implement a new alternative dispute resolution (ADR) scheme that will be independent, affordable and practical for a range of disputes and applicants'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-requires-improved-dispute-resolution-in-performing-rights-arrangements" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1111601/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:03:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reauthorises energy code of practice</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has reauthorised an industry code of practice for face-to-face energy sales by electricity and gas retailers. The authorisation runs for five years. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-reauthorises-energy-code-of-practice" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1127803/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:02:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Elgas' proposed acquisition of Kleenheat's east coast LPG business</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+6191.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1178900&amp;trimFileName=MER14+6191.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining competition concerns with the proposed acquisition by Elgas Limited of Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd’s east coast LPG business.' Interested parties have until 26 June to make a submission. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-elgas%E2%80%99-proposed-acquisition-of-kleenheat%E2%80%99s-east-coast-lpg-business" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1167533/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:02:26 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise Victorian newsagent collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178174/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> 'proposing to allow the Victorian Association of Newsagents (VANA) to   negotiate on behalf of its members with six magazine and newspaper   publishers.' Interested parties may make submissions on the draft until 20 June 2014. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-victorian-newsagent-collective-bargaining" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178174/fromItemId/278039/" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:02:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to reauthorise brick levy to help with bricklayer shortage</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'is proposing to re-authorise the brick and block manufacturing industry to continue to apply a levy on the sale of clay brick and concrete masonry products.' This levy adds approximately $15 to the cost of building an average house. The ACCC considers that the programs funded by the levy 'help address the problem of a shortage of bricklayers, by making it   easier to take on an apprentice, which will encourage more bricklayers   to do so'. The ACCC now seeks further submissions from interested parties (see para 26<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1170383/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank"> draft determination</a> - no timeline provided). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-reauthorise-brick-levy-to-help-with-bricklayer-shortage" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1170383/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:01:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining by APESMA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has granted 'granted authorisation to the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA) to implement collective bargaining arrangements for translator and interpreter members who operate as independent contractors.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-collective-bargaining-by-apesma" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130021/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 12:01:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jill Walker on aviation competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Commissioner, Dr Jill Walker, addressed the Swinburne Aviation Industry Conference in Melbourne today, discussing the ACCC's role and interest in the industry. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/competition-issues-at-the-forefront-in-aviation" target="_blank">press release</a>. Speech not yet available from <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media/speeches" target="_blank">ACCC speeches page</a>. See also Susan Zhuang, '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2014/06/acccs-crosshair-pointed-air/" target="_blank">Creating an even plane field</a>' (In Competition, 5 June 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 12:01:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Competition on egg cartels</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>Jax Arnold at <em>In Competition </em>has had fun with the ACCC's latest proceedings against Australian Egg Corporation Limited, discussing the 'egg-citing' news out of the Federal Court relating to the ACCC's allegations of an 'Eggsplosive' cartel attempt. See Jax Arnold, '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2014/05/accc-cracks-eggsplosive-cartel-attempt/" target="_blank">ACCC Cracks Down on Eggsplosive Cartel Attempt</a>' (In Competition, 29 May 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 12:00:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation for joint waste tender</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has granted authorisation to Bankstown, Fairfield, Parramatta and   Liverpool councils to tender jointly for services to process &lsquo;household   clean-up&rsquo; waste'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-sydney-councils-for-joint-waste-tender" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1138468/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 12:00:32 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow poultry growers to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC propses to grant authorisation enabling members of the NSW Farmers' Association 'who grow chicken, turkey and duck meat, to collectively bargain with processors'. See<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-poultry-growers-to-collectively-bargain" target="_blank"> ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1167581/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. Submissions on the <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1167581/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> may be made until 11 June 2014.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 12:00:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC alleges egg cartel</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has instituted proceedings in the Federal Court alleging that Australian Egg Corporation Limited (AECL) (and its managing director and two directors) and two egg producing companies, Ironside Management Services Pty Ltd (T/A Twelve Oak Poultry) and Farm Pride Foods Limited <strong>attempted </strong>to induce egg producers who were members of AECL 'to enter into an arrangement to cull hens or otherwise dispose of eggs, for the purpose of reducing the amount of eggs available for supply to consumers and businesses in Australia'). It is alleged that this conduct took place after the introduction of the new cartel laws. The ACCC is seeking declarations, injunctions, pecuniary penalties, orders that involved parties establish and maintain a compliance program, adverse publicity orders, community service orders and disqualification from directorship for the three directors alleged to be involved. See the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-following-alleged-egg-cartel-attempt" target="_blank">ACCC's press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 15:34:28 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition, Fairness and the Courts</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The paper presented by Justice Steven Rares at this year's Competition Law Conference is now available online. In it, his Honour traverses some of the history of the Act and attacks its current complexity (paying particular attention to the cartel provisions), noting (in part) that as 'a society, it is time for us to question why Australian legislation has become so bulky and impenetrable' (para 57). See <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/publications/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j-20140524" target="_blank">Justice Steven Rares, 'Competition, Fairness and the Courts' (Competition Law Conference, 24 May 2014)</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 15:34:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More AGL Media and ACCC report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>There has been some media lately on the<a href="mergers/2014agl.html" target="_blank"> proposed AGL acquisition of MacGen </a>following the <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations/act-1-2014/ACCC-report-16May2014.pdf" target="_blank">ACCC's 152-page report to the Tribunal</a> last Thursday. Para 1.2 of the ACCC's report states its position:</p>
   <blockquote>
     <p>The ACCC considers that the proposed acquisition of the assets of Macquarie
       Generation (Macquarie Generation) by AGL Energy Limited (AGL) would result, or
       be likely to result, in a small public benefit. Against this, the ACCC considers that
       the proposed acquisition would result, or be likely to result, in substantial public
       detriment constituted by a lessening of competition, due to raised barriers to entry
       and expansion for smaller electricity retailers in NSW and a material risk of
       increased generator market power. As a result of this likely lessening of
       competition, the proposed acquisition is likely to mean that consumers will pay more
       for electricity, receive lower quality service and be offered less choice.</p>
   </blockquote>
   <p>For media see, for example, Brian Robins, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/agl-macgen-buy-would-cut-competition-and-not-lower-prices-warns-accc-20140526-38yee.html" target="_blank">AGL MacGen buy would cut competition and now lower prices, warns ACCC</a>' (Sydney Morning Herald, 26 May 2014) and Maggie Lu Yueyang and Miranda Maxwell, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-says-agl-conditions-for-macgen-buy-inadequate/story-e6frg8zx-1226932127751" target="_blank">'ACCC says AGL conditions for MacGen buy 'inadequate''</a> (The Australian, Business Spectator, 26 May 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 12:09:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Law Conference</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Terrific Competition Law Conference again this year; thanks to <a href="experts/hodgekiss-chris.html">Christopher Hodgekiss</a> for putting together another great programme.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 12:09:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to grant authorisation to Melbourne councils for joint organic waste tender</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p> The ACCC 'has issued a draft determination proposing to grant authorisation for Metropolitan Melbourne Waste Management Group and eight metropolitan Melbourne councils to jointly tender and enter into contracts for the supply of organic waste processing services.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-melbourne-councils-for-joint-organic-waste-tender" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 12:09:12 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose Caltex acquisition of Scotts Group fuel division</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Caltex of the fuel division of the Scotts Group, subject to an <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178514" target="_blank">undertaking by Caltex</a> to sell four retail fuel sites. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-proposed-acquisition-of-the-fuel-division-of-the-scotts-group-by-caltex-following-divestiture-remedy" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178523/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 12:08:55 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merger cooperation with China</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC and MOFCOM have signed an MOU relating to communication and cooperation between the agency on mergers affecting both Australian and Chinese markets. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australia-and-china-to-increase-cooperation-on-mergers-regulation" target="_blank">press release</a>. See further John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/acccs-china-deal-a-dooropener/story-e6frg9io-1226926781158#" target="_blank">ACCC's China deal a door-opener</a>' (The Australian, 22 May 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 12:08:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation day at the ACCC</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has granted two authorisations issued a draft determination proposing a third. The authorisations relate to:</p>
   <ul>
     <li>collective bargaining by the Victorian Association of Newsagents in relation to public lotteries. The authorisation has been granted for 10 years. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-collective-bargaining-by-victorian-newsagents" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128719/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</li>
     <li>re-authorisation of the Mortgage and Finance Association of Australia's Disciplinary Rules until June 2019. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-re-authorises-mfaa-disciplinary-rules" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128174/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</li>
   </ul>
   <p>The <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D14+63691.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1178518&amp;trimFileName=D14+63691.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposes to authorise Renewal SA to 'sell a section of a development site in Bowden, South Australia to   Investec on the condition that 40 per cent of the dwellings are   developed as &lsquo;affordable housing&rsquo; supplied at below market rates.'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-agreement-for-construction-of-affordable-housing" target="_blank">media release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1153685/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 12:08:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC quarterly report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has released its <strong><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/acccount/acccount-1-january-to-31-march-2014" target="_blank">March 2014 quarterly report</a></strong>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-march-2014-quarterly-report" target="_blank">press release</a>. In relation to competition law matters it highlights the Flight Centre penalty, proceedings instituted against Pfizer and against Woolworths and Coles in relation to their shopper docket enforceable undertakings. The report also notes:</p>
   <ul>
     <li>there were 14 competition law<strong> enforcement proceedings</strong> during the quarter; 11 carried over from last quarter, three new cases were commenced (Pfizer, Coles and Woolworths) and one was concluded (Flight Centre);</li>
     <li>the ACCC <strong>did not accept any section 87B undertakings</strong> for alleged competition breaches in the quarter;</li>
     <li>the ACCC reviewed <strong>69 merger matters</strong> in the quarter. Of these, 53 were dealt with through pre-assessment, 11 were not opposed following review (including IAG's proposed acquisition of Wesfarmers' insurance underwriting business), one was withdrawn, two were opposed (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/mergers/2014agl.html">AGL Energy Ltd - Macquarie Generation</a> (<a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations" target="_blank">AGL has now applied for authorisation</a>) and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130860/fromItemId/751043" target="_blank">Sonic Healthcare - Delta Imaging Group</a>) outright and two were resolved through undertakings. Two SOI's were issued this quarter - the first related to AGL Energy and the other related to <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1132216/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Heathscope Ltd's proposed acquisition of Brunswick Private Hospital</a> (decision pending - delayed at request of Healthscope);</li>
     <li>three interim <strong>authorisation</strong> decisions, four draft authorisation decisions and eight final authorisation determinations were made during the quarter; </li>
     <li>157 exclusive dealing <strong>notifications</strong> (for 116 proposals) were lodged during the quarter; all that were considered this quarter were allowed to stand. There were two collective bargaining notification (relating to one proposal), by <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1139980/fromItemId/815577" target="_blank">Australian Wagering Council Ltd</a>. The ACCC issued a draft objection notice and the AWC subsequently withdrew the notifications;</li>
     <li>the ACCC <strong>continues to investigate</strong> information sharing by fuel companies (ongoing since 3 May 2012) and online competition;</li>
     <li>A total of 51,551 complaints and enquiries were received by the ACCC in the quarter; 108 of these were escalated for assessment with 25 resulting in in-depth investigation. Approximately 599 (or 1.16%) of complaints related to anti-competitive practices. Of these the most complaints related to misuse of market power (103) and exclusive dealing (66). The vast majority of complaints related to scams (39.4%) or ACL matters (27.44%).</li>
   </ul>
   <p>More about the ACCC's activities, including in relation to access matters, fuel monitoring and international engagement can be found in the report.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 14:34:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on Baxt Lecture</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has a good piece on yesterday's Baxt Lecture in today's Australian - see John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/harper-herding-pet-policy-barrows/story-e6frg9io-1226923233926#" target="_blank">Harper herding pet policy barrows</a>' (The Australian, 20 May 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 20:02:34 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baxt Lecture - John Fingleton</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[    <p>Terrific <a href="www.law.unimelb.edu.au/clen/activities-and-media/annual-baxt-lecture/" target="_blank">5th Annual Baxt Lecture</a> delivered by <a href="http://www.fingletonassociates.com/team/" target="_blank">John Fingleton</a> today on the topic 'Economics in the design and implementation of competition policy'. An audio recording of the lecture is available from the <a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/clen/activities-and-media/annual-baxt-lecture/" target="_blank">website</a>. This was followed by an expert panel discussion discussing Australia's Competition Policy Review. The panel comprised Professor Allan Fels AO, Professor Henry Ergas, Professor Stephen King and Professor Philip Williams and involved some interesting discussion around the issues raised by the current review.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 20:32:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State of Competition: The Harper Review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/9baf8b85-932a-453c-8d38-c03c99454e59.pdf" target="_blank">latest issue of <em>The State of Competition</em></a> (Issue 17) is out now and is dedicated to the Harper Review (Alexandra Merrett, Rachel Trindade and Rhonda Smith, 'The Harper Review: what they are talking about and how to join in'). As well as providing a very useful overview of the review and its key issues, this issue also provides some guidance to those looking to lodge a submission. As always, not to be missed. See also <em><a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">The State of Competition Website</a></em> for past issues.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 22:57:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Budget and the ACCC </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ASIC's budget has been slashed but the ACCC received a boost (mainly associated with carbon tax repeal monitoring) in yesterday's budget. See Andrew White, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/budget-2014/taxmans-turn-to-feel-pain-as-accc-boosted/story-fnmgotum-1226916622536#" target="_blank">Taxman’s turn to feel pain as ACCC boosted</a>' (The Australian, 14 May 2014). See also <a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/2014-15/content/bp2/html/bp2_expense-22.htm" target="_blank">budget paper 2</a> ('The Government will provide funding of $68.5 million over four years from 2014-15 to the [ACCC] to fund its operations. This funding will assist the ACCC to monitor prices and protect consumer interests in relation to the repeal of the carbon tax. ... This funding is in addition to the $25.3 million provided in the 2013-14 Additional Estimates for the ACCC to fund its operating costs in 2013-14.

...')</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 11:57:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$3m price fixing fine</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court handed down its decision in <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/453.html" target="_blank">ACCC v NSK Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 45</a> yesterday. Justice Edmonds imposed a pecuniary penalty in the sum of $3 million on NSK relating to contraventions of s 45(2) (making and giving effect to price fixing conduct in relation to ball bearings). NSK admitted the arrangements or understandings in question containing provisions to which s 45A applied and that s 45 was, as a result, contravened (the relevant conduct took place before the introduction of the current cartel laws).  NSK and the ACCC. The  ACCC and A-NSK also reached agreement as to the suggested penalty and the Court accepted that the penalty of $3m was 'within a range that,  unaided by the parties&rsquo; views, is appropriate' (para 60). See also ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/3-million-penalty-for-bearings-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 10:57:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Competition on Harper Review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hannah Luxford has posted on the King&amp;Wood Mallesons Blog, <em>In Competition </em>about the current Harper Review, discussing recent comments made by the Minister for Small Business. See Hannah Luxford, '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2014/05/economy-based-merit-muscle/" target="_blank">An economy based on merit, not muscle</a>' (12 May 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 11:57:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson on Competition Policy Review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Minister for Small Business, The Hon Bruce Billson MP, has delivered a <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/speech/011-2014/" target="_blank">speech to the Committee for Economic Development of Australia </a>discussing the current <a href="reports/2014rootbranch.html">Competition Policy Review</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 12:01:53 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Competition on Cartel reforms</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Tamara Hunter has posted on the King&amp;Wood Mallesons Blog, <em>In Competition </em>about cartel reforms in the UK and Australia. See '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2014/05/cma-sfo-mou-accc-cdpp-mean/" target="_blank">CMA, SFO, MOU, ACCC, CDPP ... What does it all mean?</a>' (9 May 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 11:56:54 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statement of Issues - M&amp;A Risk</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Nick McHugh and Claire Forster from Norton Rose Fulbright have a neat item on '<a href="http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/au/knowledge/publications/115988/ma-risk-from-accc-statement-of-issues" target="_blank">M&amp;A risk from ACCC Statement of Issues</a>' - it includes useful statistics on merger clearances (SOI's issues, opposed/not opposed/conditional clearance etc)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 11:48:28 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC cross-appeals penalty judgment against Flight Centre</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC had lodged a cross appeal in relation to the <a href="cases/2013flightcentre.html">Flight Centre</a> judgment, claiming the $11m penalty imposed on Flight Centre did not provide adequate deterrence. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-cross-appeals-penalty-judgment-against-flight-centre" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 11:48:06 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Peregrine's proposed acquisition of BP petrol station sites in SA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC will 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Peregrine Corporation (Peregrine) of BP Australia's (BP) company- owned and operated retail petrol station sites in South Australia, after accepting a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+5118.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1178163&amp;trimFileName=MER14+5118.pdf" target="_blank">court-enforceable undertaking</a>.' The review process commenced on 15 May 2013. It was suspended on two occasions to allow parties to provide further information. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-peregrines-proposed-acquisition-of-bp-petrol-station-sites-in-sa" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1178072/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 11:47:29 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alex Merrett and Rod Sims on Coles case</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Pat McGrath interviewed <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/sims-rod.html">Rod Sims</a> and <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/merrett-alexandra.html">Alexandra Merrett </a>about the ACCC's allegation of unconscionable conduct against Coles. See '<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/opinions/merrett-2014supermarkets.html">ACCC adopts new approach in challange to supermarket power</a>' (PM with Mark Colvin, 5 May 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:25:11 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles and the ACCC</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has launched an action against Coles alleging unconscionable conduct in relation to its Active Retail Collaboration program. Not a Part IV matter, but because both supermarkets and unconscionable conduct feature in the <a href="reports/2014rootbranch.html">Competition Policy Review</a> it's worth a mention. See ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-coles-for-alleged-unconscionable-conduct-towards-its-suppliers" target="_blank">press release</a>. See also Eli Greenblat, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/accc-takes-action-against-coles-over-alleged-treatment-of-suppliers-20140505-37rei.html" target="_blank">ACCC takes action against Coles over alleged treatment of suppliers</a>' (SMH, 5 May 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 15:24:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to re-authorise newsagents collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to allow the Australian Newsagents' Federation to negotiate on behalf of members. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-newsagents-to-collectively-bargain" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 15:24:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC mergers factsheet</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has recently published a 3-page 'factsheet' on mergers: '<a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Merger%20Reviews.pdf" target="_blank">What you need to know about: the ACCC's approach to merger reviews, including local markets</a>' (April 2014). Target audience appears to be consumers.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 15:24:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fairfax editorial on shopper dockets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Today's editorial in the SMH discusses the recent shopper docket saga, claiming 'a concern that Coles and Woolworths now have a perfectly legal way to   avoid the spirit of an agreement they made last year to limit these   discounts to 4c litre.' See <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/comment/smh-editorial/shopper-dockets-may-be-good-for-consumers-but-harm-petrol-retailers-20140425-zqz9y.html" target="_blank">'Shopper dockets may be good for consumers but harm petrol retailers' (SMH, 25 April 2014)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:23:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petrol saga summary</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There's a neat little summary of the recent petrol pricing saga between the ACCC, Coles and Woolworths from Michael Bradley and Kiran Bath at Marque Lawyers, including the following observation: &quot;Does this strike you as something only lawyers could dream up  and then approve with a self - satisfied and somewhat cynical  smirk? If so, you'd be right.&quot;: see, <a href="http://www.marquelawyers.com.au/assets/marque-update_2204142.pdf" target="_blank">Michael Bradley and Kiran Bath, 'The Coles and Woolies petrol discount saga - are they in trouble or not?' (Marque Update, 22 April 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:27:32 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Almunia opens 13th annual ICN conference</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Joaquín Almunia, Vice President of the European Commission responsible for Competition Policy, has opened the <a href="http://www.icnmarrakech2014.ma/" target="_blank">13th ICN annual conference</a> in Marrakech.  He states, amongst other things, '... co-ordinating our efforts in individual cases is not enough. With the rapid growth of competition regimes around the world, the risk for conflicting outcomes is real and must be addressed in a multilateral setting. I believe that the ICN is the perfect venue to minimise this risk and promote common standards for our procedures, policies and goals.'  (<a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-332_en.htm?locale=en" target="_blank">View speech</a>) ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, will be a panelist on the <em>Merger Working Group Plenary: International Cooperation in Merger Cases</em> session tomorrow and will also speak at the Closing Ceremony. The <a href="http://www.icnmarrakech2014.ma/page.aspx?id=32" target="_blank">special project</a> for this year's conference is competition enforcement in relation to State Owned Enterprises.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:27:17 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Knowingly concerned' in cartels</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The team at Jones Day have a brief note on the ACCC's recent action against leading suppliers of laundry products. See: Sébastien J. Evrard, John C. Lin, David Longstaff, Hiromitsu Miyakawa, Shinya Watanabe, Nick Taylor, Peter Wang and Yizhe Zhang, '<a href="http://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/308436/Cartels+Monopolies/ACCC+Pursues+A+Knowingly+Concerned+Accessory+To+A+Cartel" target="_blank">ACCC Pursues A "Knowingly Concerned" Accessory To A Cartel</a>' (Jones Day, 22 April 2014, Mondaq)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:26:58 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Airlines settle class action</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>A group of airlines, including Qantas, have agreed to pay (collectively) $38m to settle a class action relating to price fixing. The settlement in subject to court approval and involves no admission of liability. See, for example, Trevor Chappell, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/prominent-airlines-pay-38m-to-settle-a-class-action/story-fni0dcne-1226888609876" target="_blank">Prominent airlines pay $38m to settle a class action</a>' (Herald Sun, 17 April 2014) and Georgia Wilkins, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/qantas-four-other-airlines-to-pay-38m-in-airfreight-rigging-case-20140417-36urm.html" target="_blank">Qantas, four other airlines to pay $38m in air-freight rigging case</a>' (SMH 18 April 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:26:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flight Centre appeals</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Flight Centre lodged an appeal against the Federal Court's judgment in <a href="cases/2013flightcentre.html">ACCC v Flight Centre Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 1313</a> and against the penalties subsequently imposed. In <a href="http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20140417/pdf/42p2fcc7cgrvpg.pdf" target="_blank">its statement to the ASX</a> Flight Centre indicates that it 'believes the judgment contains 'errors and inappropriate extensions of the law' and that the 'penalties are manifestly excessive'.            </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:26:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows collective negotiations by coal producers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has granted authorisation to a group of Queensland coal producers, known   as the RG Tanna Coal Export Terminal Producers (the applicants), to   collectively negotiate with Gladstone Ports Corporation (GPC). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-collective-negotiations-by-coal-producers" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130676/" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:25:56 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to grant authorisation to APESMA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130021/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to authorise the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and   Managers, Australia (APESMA) to collectively bargain on behalf its   translator and interpreter members who operate as independent   contractors.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-apesma-to-collectively-bargain-on-behalf-of-its-translator-and-interpreter-members" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130021/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:25:36 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KitchenAid distributor gives RPM undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An importer an wholesaler of kitchenware products, including KitchenAid mixers, has provided <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1170029" target="_blank">court enforceable undertakings</a> to the ACCC in respect of resale price maintenance conduct. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/kitchenaid-distributor-undertakes-not-to-induce-retailers-on-minimum-prices" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:25:06 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harper Review Issues Paper Released</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[        <p>The <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/consultation/issues-paper/" target="_blank">Issues Paper</a> (which runs to 59 pages) for the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranch.html">Harper Review</a> was released yesterday and is open for submissions until 10 June 2014. The issues paper begins with a message from the panel which states that &quot;it is now time for 'Hilmer Mark II' and noting that they will be 'examining the broader competition framework, to make sure that it can contribute to the Australian economy for the next 20 years.'</p>
            <p> A <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2014/04/Issues_Paper_Fact_Sheet.pdf" target="_blank">fact sheet </a>has also been released.  This sets out an indicative timeline for review (draft report due September 2014). Plenty of media. See further, Joanna Mather, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/review_to_examine_price_gouging_tnBhRZtvrsoN6mJ0No3nlI" target="_blank">Review to examine price gouging on technology</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 14 April 2014), Peter Martin, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/standard-of-living-the-key-to-competition-review-says-professor-ian-harper-20140415-36ps9.html" target="_blank">Standard of living key to competition review, says Professor Ian Harper</a>' (15 April 2014, The Age)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:35:47 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Woolworths breached shopper docket undertaking; Coles cleared</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court yesterday found Woolworths breached its <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128693" title="Woolworths undertaking" target="_blank">undertaking</a> on fuel shopper dockets from January - March this year, because its 8 cents per litre discount was contingent on acquiring Woolworths supermarket goods or services. Woolworths  changed its discount structure following the ACCC's Federal Court action. Coles, on the other hand, was found not to have breached <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128691" title="Coles undertaking" target="_blank">their agreement</a>, because the higher discounts were funded primarily though Coles Express stores. The ACCC expressed disappointment that 'the Court has found that Coles and Woolworths can bundle a supermarket fuel offer with a petrol station offer'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-finds-woolworths-breached-fuel-shopper-docket-undertaking-but-later-offers-by-coles-and-woolworths-did-not" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>
   <p>See, eg, Amy Bainbridge, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-14/woolworths-found-to-have-breached-accc-fuel-dockets-agreement/5388068" target="_blank">Woolworths found to have breached ACCC fuel dockets deal</a>' (ABC, 14 April 2014), Blair Speedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/extra-supermarket-fuel-discount-offers-can-continue-court-rules/story-fn91v9q3-1226883588334#" target="_blank">Extra supermarket fuel discount offers can continue, court rules</a>' (The Australian, 14 April 2014), Mitchell Neems, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/accc-welcomes-woolworths-decision/story-e6frg90f-1226883828326" target="_blank">ACCC welcomes Woolworths decision</a>' (The Australian, 14 April 2014), Simon Thomsen, '<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com.au/woolies-busted-by-competition-watchdog-after-breaking-promise-on-fuel-discounts-2014-4" target="_blank">Woolies busted by competition watchdog after breaking promise on fuel discounts</a>' (Business Insider, 14 April 2014) and Stephen Bartholomeusz, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/4/14/industries/discounting-hollow-shopper-docket-victory" target="_blank">Discounting a hollow shopper-docket victory</a>' (Business Spectator, 14 April 2014) (noting that the case did not investigate whether the conduct actually impacted competition and claiming that the fact that the ACCC has never sought to make the SLC case 'probably signals it doubts that case could be made')'. The judgment is not yet available from <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/" target="_blank">AustLII</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:36:04 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Informed Sources release petrol price app</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[     <p>Informed Sources has released a new petrol price app. No doubt this has been done, in part, to end the ACCC's investigation into its practises (the ACCC has said its investigation would conclude by June 30 this year - more than two years after it began); at $2.49 per download, the app may also earn them a tidy sum. See, eg, John Rolfe, '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/cheaper-petrol-just-a-click-away-with-new-smartphone-app/story-e6frfm1i-1226882898130" target="_blank">Cheaper petrol just a click away with new smartphone app' </a>(14 April 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:35:47 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases draft cartel immunity and cooperation policy for comment</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has released a <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/draft-immunity-and-cooperation-policy/supporting_documents/DRAFT%20ACCC%20immunity%20and%20cooperation%20policy%2009%20April%202014%202.pdf" target="_blank">draft of its new Immunity and Cooperation Policy for Cartel Conduct</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-draft-cartel-immunity-and-cooperation-policy-for-comment" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/draft-immunity-and-cooperation-policy" target="_blank">consultation hub</a>. Closing date for submissions is 7 May 2014. This follows an earlier consultation that ran from 30 September 2013 to 28 October 2013. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:45:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another waste tender authorisation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1129143/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">granted authorisation</a> to Northern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (NSROC) and member councils to 'tender and contract jointly for the transfer, processing and disposal of household waste.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-north-sydney-councils-for-joint-waste-tender" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1129143/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:44:53 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation for underground electrical works</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128155/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">authorised</a> Victoria&rsquo;s electricity distributors to maintain an   accreditation scheme for civil contractors for underground civil works   on electrical infrastructure.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-an-accreditation-scheme-for-civil-contractors-for-underground-electrical-works" target="_blank">press release</a>. View<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128155/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank"> authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:44:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Business Spectator interviews Sims</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Alan Kohler and Stephen Bartholomeusz have<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/4/7/national-affairs/kgb-rod-sims" target="_blank"> interviewed ACCC Chair, Rod Sims</a>. In the interview Sims defends the current structure of the ACCC, discusses competition in education and sectors in which competition is restricted (such as newsagents and pharmacies), discusses the relationship between big and small business and denies excessive focus on supermarkets (blaming the media for this perceived focus) See also Mitchell Neems, '<a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/4/7/retail/sims-denies-excessive-supermarket-focus" target="_blank">Sims denies excessive supermarket focus</a>' (Business Spectator, 7 April 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 11:44:12 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Transurban Consortium's proposed acquisition of Queensland tollroad assets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC will not oppose the proposed acquisition of the tollroad and assets held by Queensland Motorways Groupby a Transurban-led consortium. The ACCC concluded that the acquisition would be unlikely to substantially lessen competition. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-transurban-consortium%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-the-tollroad-assets-of-queensland-motorways-group" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1164122/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:54:34 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks views on CBH's proposed new port terminal access undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has invited submissions 'from interested parties in the bulk wheat export industry on CBH&rsquo;s proposed new Port Terminal Services Access Undertaking'.  Submissions are due by 30 April 2014. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-views-on-cbhs-proposed-new-port-terminal-access-undertaking" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/wheat-export/co-operative-bulk-handling-2014/proposed-undertaking" target="_blank">Issues paper and related documents</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:54:17 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Boral, CSR brick merger plan in the news</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has said the ACCC will look very closely at the proposal by Boral and CSR to combine their east coast brick operations. See, John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-wont-like-boral-csr-brick-merger-plan/story-e6frg9io-1226874509957#" target="_blank">ACCC won't like Boral, CSR brick merger plan</a>' (The Australian, 4 April 2014) and Tim Binsted, Max Mason, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/boral-csr-hope-to-seal-brickclad-deal-to-shore-up-the-joint-20140404-36450.html" target="_blank">Boral, CSR hope to seal brick-clad deal to shore up the joint</a>' (The Sydney Morning Herald, 5 April 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:53:57 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases annual Aiprport Monitoring Report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The ACCC has released its annual <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/airport-monitoring-reports/airport-monitoring-report-2012-13" target="_blank">Airport Monitoring Report for 2012-2013</a>. If found that airports continue to be profitable but only one airport achieved a higher than 'satisfactory' quality of service rating and there were continued signs of congestion. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/booming-demand-and-price-increases-drive-airport-profits-higher-while-quality-of-service-remains-flat" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:53:40 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation day at the ACCC</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has: </p>
            <ul>
              <li>granted interim authorisation to four Sydney councils to commence a joint tender for household cleanup waste. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-sydney-councils-for-joint-waste-tender" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1138468/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</li>
              <li>granted interim authorisation to three Tasmanian councils to commence a joint tender for the processing of recyclable materials. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-tasmanian-councils-for-joint-waste-tender" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1136832/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</li>
              <li>issued a draft determination proposing to grant authorisation 'enable current and future members of the Australian CFD Forum to make and give effect to a number of proposed best practice standards in the provision of contracts for difference (CFD).' Para 67 states: 'The ACCC will now seek further submissions from interested parties. In addition, the applicant or any interested party may request that the ACCC hold a conference to discuss the draft determination, pursuant to section 90A of the Act'. However, no deadline or timeline for final decision is provided. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-best-practice-standards-in-the-provision-of-contracts-for-difference" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130025/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</li>
            </ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:53:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Opinion piece on Harper Review by Alex Merrett</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Alexandra Merrett has a new opinion piece in the Conversation today discussing the Harper review: see <a href="http://theconversation.com/an-ambitious-agenda-for-harpers-competition-review-24947" target="_blank">Alex Merrett, 'An ambitious agenda for Harper’s competition review ' (The Conversation, 1 April 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 10:53:03 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BCA welcomes competition review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.bca.com.au/newsroom/competition-review-terms-of-reference-and-panel-statement" target="_blank">BCA has welcomed the release of the final terms of reference</a> of the competition policy review. BCA Chief Executive, Jennifer Westacott, stated that 'This review now provides the opportunity to reset Australia’s competition reform agenda to drive increased innovation, productivity and economic growth in future decades' and suggested that to do this the review must 'focus on removing poor and unnecessary regulation on business and focus on opportunities for more cost-effective administration of the law.' See also <a href="http://www.bca.com.au/newsroom/competition-policy-from-1992-to-2014-presentation-by-fred-hilmer" target="_blank">Competition Policy from 1992 to 2014: Presentation by Professor Fred Hilmer</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 10:52:42 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AGL Merger Authorisation Application </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>AGL's<a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations" target="_blank"> merger authorisation application</a> is now available from the Australian Competition Tribunal Website. This includes the 95 page <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations/act-1-2014/form-s.pdf" target="_blank">form S application</a> (redacted in parts) and </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 10:52:20 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Root and Branch review kicks off</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The panel and final terms of reference have finally been announced. As predicted, Prof Ian Harper will Chair the panel. He will be joined by Su McCluskey, Michael O'Brien SC and Peter Anderson. The <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/014-2014/" target="_blank">Treasury Press Release</a> states that the 'Harper Review' will 'help identify ways to build the economy and promote investment, growth, job creation and durable benefits for consumers'. See further <a href="http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review website</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:19:27 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flight Centre fined for attempting to induce Price Fixing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Logan in the Federal Court has ordered Flight Centre to pay an $11m fine for six incidents of attempting to induce price fixing in contravention of s 45 - these occurred between 2005 and 2009, prior to the introduction of the new cartel laws. The penalty comprised 4 x $2m penalties and 1 x $3m penalties. In trspect of the first contravention, Justice Logan held that, as it occurred more than six years prior to commencement of proceedings, no civil penalty was recoverable (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca77.html">s 77</a>). The higher penalty for one of the contraventions recognised 'Mr Turner&rsquo;s direct, personal  involvement in that contravention.' (para 60)</p>
<p>Justice Logan also needed to consider the fact that some contraventions occurred prior to the increase in civil penalties which came into force on 1 January 2007; however, procedural failures prevented higher penalties from being considered (at para 25) 'Neither as originally cast nor by permitted  amendment did the [ACCC's] statement of claim contain an allegation of any  material fact  necessary to engage a maximum penalty greater than $10 million in respect of any  of the alleged contraventions.' </p>
<p>Flight Centre is expected to appeal both the principal judgment and the penalties.</p>
<p>See further:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/292.html" target="_blank">Penalty decision (ACCC v Flight Centre Limited (No 3) [2014] FCA 292 (28 March 2014))</a></li>
  <li><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/1313.html" target="_blank">Principal judgment (ACCC v Flight Centre Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 1313 (6 December 2013)) </a> </li>
  <li><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/11-million-penalties-imposed-on-flight-centre" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a></li>
  <li>For a useful discussion of the original judgment see: <a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_15_2013_Review_.pdf" target="_blank">Rachel Trindade, Alexandra Merrett and Rhonda Smith, '2013: the year of waiting patiently' (The State of Competition, Issue 15 (Dec 2013))</a></li>
  <li>AAP, '<a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/03/28/flight-centre-fined-11m-price-fixing?fb_action_ids=10152892838090288&amp;fb_action_types=og.recommends&amp;fb_source=other_multiline&amp;action_object_map=[651656154899705]&amp;action_type_map=[%22og.recommends%22]&amp;action_ref_map=[]" target="_blank">Flight Centre fined $11m for price fixing</a>' (SBS, 28 March 2014)</li>
  <li>Sarah Kimmorley, '<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com.au/flight-centre-fined-11-million-for-price-fixing-2014-3" target="_blank">Flight Centre Fined $11 Million for Price</a>-Fixing' (Business Insider, 28 March 2014) </li>
  <li>'<a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/flight-centre-fined-11-million-for-price-fixing/story-fnda1bsz-1226867424723" target="_blank">Flight Centre fined $11 million for price fixing</a>' (news.com.au, 28 March 2014)</li>
</ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:35:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shopper dockets in Court</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court commenced hearing the Coles/Woolworths shopper docket case yesterday. Judgment has been reserved. This case relates to allegations by the ACCC (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-coles-and-woolworths-for-allegedly-breaching-fuel-shopper-docket-undertakings" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>) that Coles and Woolworths contravened their undertakings regarding the use of shopper dockets. See, for example, Elizabeth Knight, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/coles-woolies-shopperdocket-rumble-going-down-in-federal-court-20140326-35it8.html" target="_blank">Coles, Woolies shopper-docket rumble going down in Federal Court</a>' (SMH, 27 March 2014)</p]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:35:25 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AGL applies for authorisation for Macquarie Generation acquisition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>AGL Energy has applied for authorisation in relation to its proposed takeover of Macquarie Generation. This follows a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128493/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">refusal by the ACCC to grant informal clearance</a> for the merger earlier this month. See <a href="http://www.agl.com.au/about-agl/media-centre/article-list/2014/march/agl-lodges-application-with-australian-competition-tribunal-to-acquire-macquarie-generation" target="_blank">AGL Press Release</a>. See also AAP, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/agl-opts-for-macgen-appeal/story-e6frg90f-1226864007485" target="_blank">AGL to fight rejected MacGen bu</a>y' (The Australian, 25 March 2014) and Angela Macdonald-Smith, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/agl-appeals-accc-veto-of-15b-macquarie-generation-takeover-20140324-35e2l.html" target="_blank">AGL appeals ACCC veto of $1.5b Macquarie Generation takeover</a>' (Sydney Morning Herald, 24 March 2014) (note this refers to an appeal and compares it to the <a href="cases/agl.html">AGL federal court case</a> - it is, in fact, a separate application for authorisation rather than an appeal or application for declaration as in the earlier case). The application is not yet available from the <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/" target="_blank">Tribunal website</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:09:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition Out Now</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a> team has released <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">Issue 16 - Australia's small business sector: &quot;Not for the faint of heart&quot;</a>. As always, a must read, particularly in light of the forthcoming root and branch review (if in fact it ever arrives).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:09:38 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN in the bush</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Lots of chatter about NBN in the bush at the moment, particularly following the <a href="http://www.communications.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/217427/ACCC_Submission.pdf" target="_blank">ACCC's submission</a> on 14 March 2014 (the last day for submissions). See '<a href="http://www.communications.gov.au/broadband/national_broadband_network/cost-benefit_analysis_and_review_of_regulation" target="_blank">Cost-Benefit Analysis and Review of Regulation</a>' home page. See also John Durie, &quot;<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/business/time-for-turnbull-to-fill-gaps-in-the-bush/story-fn8ulpij-1226858534761#" target="_blank">Time for Turnbull to fill gaps in the bush</a>&quot; (The Australian, 19 March 2014), John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/malcolm-turnbulls-nbn-stance-has-created-giant-headaches/story-e6frg9io-1226858031347#" target="_blank">Malcolm Turnbull's NBN stance has created giant headaches</a>' (The Australian, 18 March 2014), Annabel Hepworth, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/in-depth/accc-pushes-for-end-to-nbn-crosssubsidies/story-e6frgaif-1226857497090#" target="_blank">ACCC pushes for end to NBN cross-subsidies</a>' (The Australian, 18 March 2014) and for some diversity try Chris Duckett, '<a href="http://www.zdnet.com/reverse-handout-regional-group-wants-to-co-invest-in-nbn-7000027421/" target="_blank">Reverse handout: Regional group wants to co-invest in NBN</a>' (ZDNet, 18 March 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:09:14 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Record fuel prices</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Leahmann has an item in the Sunday Telegraph about the effect of the Coles/Woolworths shopper-docket undertakings on fuel prices: see John Lehmann, '<a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/motorists-hit-with-record-petrol-prices-after-accc-attack-on-shopper-dockets-backfires/story-fni0cx12-1226855607549" target="_blank">Motorists hit with record petrol prices after ACCC attack on shopper dockets backfires</a>' (The Daily Telegraph, 15 March 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:08:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wants price signalling ban extended</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>In a speech to the National Consumer Congress in Sydney today ('<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/empowering-consumers-in-the-digital-age" target="_blank">Empowering consumers in the digital age</a>') ACCC Chairman Ron Sims highlights 'price signalling' as an area for debate in the forthcoming root and branch review, claiming 'recent statements regarding airline capacity shows why these laws need to be extended to all sectors of the economy'.  Current <a href="law/pricesignalling.html">price signalling </a>laws apply only to the banking sector. See Michael Janda, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-13/accc-flags-extension-of-price-signalling-ban-citing-airlines/5316048" target="_blank">ACCC flags extension of price signalling ban, citing airlines</a>' (ABC News).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:43:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AFR names Ian Harper as front-runner for competition review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Today's AFR confirms <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/ian-harper-8628/profile_bio" target="_blank">Prof Ian Harper</a> as front-runner for competition review. We are also told again that PM Abbott is 'close to finalising his short-list'.See Fluer Anderson, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/politics/ian_harper_front_runner_to_lead_GTNG2Lth35BybsUUGZs5YJ" target="_blank">Harper tipped for review job</a>' (The Australian Financial Review, 13 March 2014, page 15)</p>
            <blockquote>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:43:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Durie: Ian Harper tipped to head root and branch review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/ian-harper-tipped-for-canberras-competition-review-role/story-e6frg8zx-1226851088059#" target="_blank">yesterday's Australian</a> John Durie reported that <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/ian-harper-8628/profile_bio" target="_blank">Prof Ian Harper</a>, partner at Deloitte Access Economics, is expected to be named head of the 'root and branch' competition review (see also <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/djs-myer-drowning-in-the-same-boat/story-e6frg9io-1226851939727#" target="_blank">today's Australian</a>)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:43:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Declaration of anticompetitive conduct by Cement Australia</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Federal Court has made declarations in ACCC v Cement Australia. These declarations follow interim <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/909.html" target="_blank">declarations made on 10 September 2013</a>. Justice Greenwood found that the respondents' conduct 'had the purpose and effect of preventing a competitor from entering the market by obtaining direct access to a source of flyash in South East Queensland' and, as a result, having the purpose and effect of substantially lessening competition.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-declares-anticompetitive-conduct-by-cement-australia" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2014/2014fca0148" target="_blank">Federal Court decision</a>.</p>
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:43:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Xenophon's Misuse of Market Power Bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>On Thursday Senator Nick Xenophon moved the introduction of the <a href="legislation/2014mmp-bill.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Misuse of Market Power) Bill 2014</a>. While the bill has no prospect of passage, if it did pass it would  give the Court power to direct a corporation found guilty of a s 46 breach to reduce its market share. It is squarely directed at supermarkets. Senator Xenophon's second reading speech claims:</p>
            <blockquote>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 12:43:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commentary on root and branch review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>There is an item in today's Austrlaian by David Crowe and Lauren Wilson (<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/economic-gurus-issue-mps-with-call-to-arms-on-reform/story-fn59niix-1226848459983#" target="_blank">Economic gurus issue MPs with call to arms on reform</a>) - but still no clues on when we're likely to see the final terms of reference.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 12:42:51 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New AJCCL out</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The latest issue of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (vol 22 part 1) is out now. It includes the following articles and notes of interest:</p>
            <ul>
              <li>Dave Poddar and Angela Flannery, 'The far side of the Pilbara: The Porductivity Commission on the wrong track?'</li>
              <li>Justin Lipinski, 'Blurring the bright line? Third line forcing revisited'</li>
              <li>Amanda Richman, 'Authorisations and Notifications: Price setting and collective bargaining arrangements for professionals - in what circumstances will they be authorised?'</li>
              <li>Michael Ferguson and Scott Meacock, 'Enforcements and Remedies: Cartel conduct: A survey of the ACCC's enforcement activity' </li>
              <li>Rob Nicholls, 'Telecommunications: Structural separation, interconnection and access'</li>
              <li>Paul McLachlan, 'Not all benefits are services: ACCC v ANZ Banking Group Ltd'</li>
              <li>Rodrigo Morales-Elcoro, 'Report from Latin America: Recent experiences of Antitrust Reform and performance: Mexico, Chile and Brazil'</li>
            </ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 12:42:23 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow collective bargaining by coal producers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130676/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft decision proposing to grant authorisation</a> to certain Queensland coal producers to collectively negotiate with Gladstone Ports Corp. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-collective-negotiations-by-coal-producers" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:41:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Clubs Australia to collectively bargain with suppliers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has authorised collective bargaining by Clubs Australia for five years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-clubs-australia-to-collectively-bargain-with-suppliers" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:42:06 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed acquisition of OneSteel Sheet and Coil by Bluescope</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of the OneSteel Sheet and Coil   business from Arrium Limited by BlueScope Steel Limited after accepting   an <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+2718.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1149470&amp;trimFileName=MER14+2718.pdf" target="_blank">undertaking</a> from BlueScope to sell its sheet and coil processing   assets in Western Australia.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-proposed-acquisition-of-onesteel-sheet-and-coil-by-bluescope" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1148888/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:41:25 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blackout - In Competition blogs on the AGL decision</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>King&amp;Wood Mallesons' blog, <em>In Competition</em>, has a post by Pam Cue on the ACCC's AGL merger decision. View <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2014/03/blackout/" target="_blank">'Blackout'</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:41:10 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AGL may challenge ACCC merger decision</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has a couple of pieces in the Australian about the ACCC's AGL decision. The first (with Mitchell Neems) was published yesterday - '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/agl-tipped-to-appeal-acccs-macquarie-generation-decision/story-e6frg8zx-1226844480452" target="_blank">AGL tipped to appeal ACCC's Macquarie Generation decision</a>'. The second is an opinion piece in today's Australian - '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/agl-boss-michael-frasers-only-option-is-to-appeal-acccs-macgen-ruling/story-e6frg9io-1226845242972#" target="_blank">AGL boss Michael Fraser's only option is to appeal ACCC's MacGen ruling</a>'. Watch this space.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:40:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes AGL's proposed acquisition of Macquarie Generation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'has today announced that it will oppose the acquisition of the assets of Macquarie Generation by AGL Energy Limited (AGL).' The ACCC considers the proposed acquisition will substantially lessen competition in 'the market for the retail supply of electricity in New South Wales'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-opposes-agls-proposed-acquisition-of-macquarie-generation" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1147200/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. A public competition assessment will be 'published in due course'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:40:23 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AGL Energy SOI</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has releaased a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER14+1581.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1137045&amp;trimFileName=MER14+1581.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining concerns with proposed acquisition of Macquarie Generation by AGL and have stated that its preliminary view is that the acquisition would result in a substantial lessening of competition in one retail and at least one wholesale market. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-agls-proposed-acquisition-of-macquarie-generation" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128493/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:14:44 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'It's an online world'</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Martine Phillips has posted an item in <em><a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2014/02/online-world/" target="_blank">In Competition</a></em>on the impact of online shopping and retail on market definition in a competition context - prompted by ACCC comments in relation too a proposed David Jones/Myer merger.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:39:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to grant authorisation for David Jones 'stores within stores' promotions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has issued a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128444/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation to   David Jones to continue inviting certain businesses operating within its   stores to participate in various promotions.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-david-jones-for-%E2%80%98stores-within-stores%E2%80%99-promotions" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128444/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:39:19 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC brings shopper docket case</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>There's nothing fuel purchasers hate more than discounts (!) - so the ACCC has taken action against both Coles and Woolworths alleging they have broken their promises over fuel shopper dockets. In a (very strange) <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/coles-and-woolworths-undertake-to-cease-supermarket-subsidised-fuel-discounts" target="_blank">agreement</a> that entered force on 1 January, both Coles and Woolworths agreed not to offer supermarket shopper-docket discounts of more than 4 cents from fuel (subject to limited exceptions). The ACCC is alleging that Woolworths have offered a bundled discount of 8 cents and Coles have offered a bundled discount of 14 cents and that these offers contravene their respective undertakings. According to the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-coles-and-woolworths-for-allegedly-breaching-fuel-shopper-docket-undertakings" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a> , however, at least in the case of Coles (the release is a bit vague about WW) you can get the 10c by just purchasing $20 or more at the petrol station - it does not appear contingent on the grocery service. More to come on this one! </p>
<p>See also <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-watchdog-accc-takes-woolworths-coles-to-court-over-fuel-dockets-20140225-33egl.html" target="_blank">Eli Greenblat, 'Consumer watchdog ACCC takes Woolworths, Coles to court over fuel dockets' (SMH, 25 February 2014)</a> and  <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/2/25/retail/accc-moves-coles-woolworths" target="_blank">Mitchell Neems, ACCC moves on Coles, Woolworths (Business Spectator, 25 February 2014)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:10:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC alleges misuse of market power against Pfizer</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Last week the ACCC instituted proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against Pfizer (Case NSD146/2014 in NSW registry) alleging misuse of market power and exclusive dealing in 'relation to its supply of atorvastatin to pharmacies'(see media <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-pfizer-australia-for-alleged-anti-competitive-conduct" target="_blank">release</a>). The Government took the opportunity to issue a <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/004-2014/" target="_blank">press release</a> indicating it would keep a 'close eye' on the case and reminding everyone that the misuse of market power provision would be looked at as part of the 'root and branch' review. First directions hearing in the case is scheduled for 18 March 2014 before Justice Flick.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:10:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access Regime - Productivity Commission Report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The Productivity Commission's Report on the National Access Regime was released last week. The <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/access-regime/report" target="_blank">Final Report</a> recommends that the National Access Regime should be retained. It makes a number of other recommendations - in relation to paragraphs 44G(2)(b) and 44H(4)(b) the PC recommendat that they be amended so that criterion (b) is satisfied 'where total foreseeable market demand over the declaration period could be met at least cost by the facility. Total market demand should include the demand for the service under application as well as the demand for any substitute services provided by facilities serving that market. The assessment of costs under criterion (b) should include an estimate of any production costs incurred by the infrastructure service provider from coordinating multiple users of its facility.' (recommendation 8.2).  </p>
<p>Bruce Billson MP issued a <a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/media-release/003-2014/" target="_blank">press release</a> accompanying the release of the final report in which it indicated it would not respond to the PC's report until the 'root and branch' review is completed. </p>
<p>See also <a href="http://www.minterellison.com/publications/detail.aspx?publication=1350" target="_blank">Minter Ellison Alert - Government releases final report into National Access Regime</a> (20 February 2014) which provides a neat summary of the key findings and recommendations.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:10:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC compliance and enforcement policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has released its 2014 <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/compliance-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> (view online or download as 4-page PDF). Core focus is on consumer issues, although mention is made of prioritising 'competition and consumer issues in highly concentrated secorts, in particular in the supermarket and fuel sectors' (nothing new here) and the policy states that some areas are always regarded as a priority, including 'cartel conduct and anti-competitive agreements, and the misuse of market power'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-2014-compliance-and-enforcement-policy-promises-action-on-drip-pricing" target="_blank">press release</a></p>
<p>Chairman Rod Sims will also be delivering a speech at the CEDA Conference today (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/ceda-conference-looking-forward-to-2014" target="_blank">Looking forward to 2014</a>) - the speech has a separate section dedicated to competition enforcement. Shopper dockets, petrol price information sharing and supermarket business practices are all discussed - again. The Pfizer and Visa cases naturally rate a mention. Sims indicates that there are ten 'in depth investigations under way in relation to anti-competitive agreements' (a bit like last year) and around 15 in relation to alleged misuse of market power with one likely to be before the courts soon which, he assures us, does not involve supermarkets or petrol. Merger activity is also discussed and the speech finishes with a brief mention of the anticipated 2014 'highlight' - the promised 'root and branch' review.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:10:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants authorisation to Myer for 'stores within stores' promotions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has granted authorisation to Myer to continue inviting certain businesses operating within Myer Stores to participate in various promotions'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-myer-for-stores-within-stores-promotions" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125791/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:08:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Amcor's proposed acquisition of Detmold's Australian operations</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Amcor Ltd of Detmold Group&rsquo;s Australian flexible packaging operation.' In its press release it noted that in 'reaching its decision, the ACCC determined that actual and potential   import competition was likely to continue to provide a strong constraint   on Amcor following the acquisition'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-amcors-proposed-acquisition-of-detmolds-australian-operations" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1141262/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:09:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose iSentia's proposed acquisition of AAP's media monitoring business</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Australian Associated Press Ltd&rsquo;s media monitoring business by iSentia Pty Limited', concluding that it 'was highly unlikely that AAP would continue to operate its media monitoring business if the proposed acquisition did not procee'. The ACCC has indicated it will issue a Public Competition Assessment in relation to this merger review. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-isentias-proposed-acquisition-of-aaps-media-monitoring-business" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1141290/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:10:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Catholic healthcare network</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC 'has granted interim authorisation to enable a network of Catholic health   facilities to continue to collectively bargain with health funds, the   Repatriation Commission and a range of suppliers.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-catholic-healthcare-network" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128907/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p> ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:06:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Norton Rose Fulbright - thought piece on root and branch review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Dr Martyn Taylor and Josh Buckland at Norton Rose Fulbright have just published an excellent thought piece on the proposed '<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranch.html" target="_blank">root and branch</a>' competition review (still awaiting final terms of reference and panel!). Headed '<a href="http://www.lawchat.com.au/index.php/the-greatest-australian-competition-reforms-in-20-years-by-dr-martyn-taylor/" target="_blank">The greatest Australian competition reforms in 20 years</a>' the piece works through the political context to the Review, the 'extraordinary' breadth of the review, the panel and timing of the review, the 'likely apetite for further deregulation', possible agency reforms, possible 'trimming' of the laws, small business issues and more - it runs for eight pages and is well worth reading. It can be downloaded from <a href="http://www.lawchat.com.au/index.php/the-greatest-australian-competition-reforms-in-20-years-by-dr-martyn-taylor/" target="_blank">CCH's law chat page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:10:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gilbert + Tobin Competition Review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>Gilbert + Tobin have released their <a href="http://ecomms.gtlaw.com.au/rv/ff001557ca615bef29738651824d86ef25fa0a66" target="_blank">inaugural Competition Review</a>. The Review is both a PDF publication and related video. It includes, for example, a<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBAYXo4ebLA" target="_blank"> 22 minute video between Gilbert + Tobin partner Gina Cass-Gottlieb and Rami Greiss</a> from the ACCC's Merger Investigations Branch. Well worth a close look.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:15:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BCA on Competition Policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>There was an opinion article in the AFR by BCA Chief Executive, Jennifer Westacott and Managing Partner of Gilbert + Tobin, Danny Gilbert entitled '<a href="http://bca.com.au/newsroom/competition-policy-review-opinion-article-in-the-afr-by-jennifer-westacott-and-danny-gilbert" target="_blank">Competition Policy Review Offers Chance to Support Growth</a>'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:15:20 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>new ABLR issue out</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The latest Australian Business Law Review is out (volume 42(1)). It contains several interesting items, including an overview by the editor, Prof Bob Baxt, of some of the matters he believes may be tat the forefront of the 'root and branch' competition review and a discussion by Prof Setpehn Corones of 'agents as intermediaries' in the context of the recent ANZ and Flight Centre cases. It also includes publication of the 2013 annual Baxt Lecture, National Competition Policy: Coming of Age, delivered by Professor Fred Hilmer AO.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:15:05 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims to assume CEO role</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced that ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, will also assume role of CEO of the ACCC from 3 Feb 2014 following last week's announcement by current CEO, Brian Cassidy, that he will retire on 23 May 2014. Brian Cassidy will assist with the transition and with the ACCC's submission to the Root and Branch review. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/changes-to-accc-ceo-arrangements" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:14:27 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose ERM Power's proposed acquisition fo Macquarie Generation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has announced it will not opposed this proposed acquisition after forming the view that &quot;an acquisition of Macquarie Generation by ERM was not likely to   substantially reduce the competitiveness of generators or retailers or   otherwise raise barriers to entry in the relevant electricity markets&quot;. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-erm-power%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-macquarie-generation" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1133668/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:13:10 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose BlueScope Steel's proposed acquisition of Fielders Australia</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC will not oppose the proposed acquisition by BlueScope Steel Ltd of Fielders Australia, concluding that although &quot;BlueScope has market power in the supply of painted coil inputs through   its COLORBOND product lines, this level of market power would not be   altered by the acquisition.&quot; View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-bluescope-steel%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-fielders-australia" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1133682/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:13:36 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Murray Goulburn pulls out of WCB bid</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>Murray Goulburn has withdrawn its bid for Warrnambool Cheese &amp; Butter and will sell its holding to rival bidder, Canadian dary company, Saputo. On 23 January a <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/24490/No54-APP-Notice-of-withdrawal.pdf" target="_blank">notice of withdrawal</a> was submitted to the Australian Competition Tribunal which was due to begin hearing the <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations/ACT4-2013-Form-S-3Dec2013-redacted.pdf" target="_blank">authorisation application</a> next month. See, for example, RN Breakfast, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/saputo-claims-victory-in-cheese-wars/5224612" target="_blank">Saputo claims victory in cheese wars</a>' (29 January 2014 - audio download) John Durie, 'Murray <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/murray-goulburn-will-withdraw-wcb-bid-to-fight-again/story-e6frg8zx-1226807451520#" target="_blank">Goulburn will withdraw WCB bid to fight again</a>' (The Australian, 22 January 2014) Trevor Chappell, '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/murray-goulburn-pulls-out-of-wcb-fight/story-e6frfkur-1226808676306" target="_blank">Murray Goulburn pulls out of WCB fight</a>' (news.com.au, 23 January 2014)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:07:05 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wine growers complain to ACCC</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-24/wine-price-accc/5217032?&amp;section=news" target="_blank">ABC reports</a> that Murray Valley, Riverina and Riverland growers will make a joint complaint to the ACCC regarding recent price slashing due to oversupply. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:06:26 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amcor merger decision delayed</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC was originally scheduled to issue a decision regarding Amcor's proposed acquisition of Detmold Flexibles &amp; Detmark on 30 January. This has been delayed following receipt of further information from the parties. A new date has yet to be announced. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128187/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:06:45 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises collective bargaining by office products retailers group</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[     <p>The ACCC 'has allowed Office Choice Limited, Office Brands Limited, Office   Products Depot, as well as their current and future Australian members   and franchisees, to continue to collectively bargain with office   products suppliers.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-reauthorises-collective-bargaining-by-office-products-retailers-group" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1127067/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:06:02 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise collective negotiations by AMA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to re-authorise collective bargaining by the AMA for 10 years. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-re-authorise-collective-negotiations-by-the-ama" target="_blank">press release</a> and <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1127850/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:05:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interim authorisation for Victorian Association of Newsagents</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[        <p>The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to the Victorian Association of Newsagents to collectively bargain with Tatts and Intralot. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-victorian-association-of-newsagents" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128719/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:03:36 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes proposed acquisition by Sonic Healthcare of Delta Imaging Group assets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC  'has announced it will oppose the proposed acquisition by Sonic   Healthcare Limited (Sonic) of assets of Delta Imaging Pty Limited (in   liquidation), Delta Imaging Maitland Pty Limited (in liquidation) and   Cscan Asset Pty Limited (in liquidation) collectively, the Delta Imaging   Group' after concluding the proposed acquisition would be likely to have the 'effect of substantially lessening competition in the market for the   supply of MRI services in Newcastle and Maitland, and the market for the   supply of general diagnostic imaging services in Maitland.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-sonic%E2%80%99s-acquisition-of-the-assets-of-delta-imaging-group" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1130860/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:02:50 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durie on Justice Mansfield's request for political views on MG/WCB case</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Durie has an item in this weekend's Australian about Justice Mansfield's decision to write to state premiers and others regarding Murray Goulburn's authorisation application relating to its bid for Warrnambool Cheese & Butter.  He describes the action as 'unprecedented and, at best, truly bizarre'.  As always, worth reading. See <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/competition-tribunals-move-in-the-dairy-takeover-game-is-unprecedented/story-e6frg9io-1226799310255#" target="_blank">John Durie, 'Competition Tribunal's move in the dairy takeover game is unprecedented' (The Australian, 11 January 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:42:29 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Durie on Bruce Billson and the competition review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>John Durie has an item in today's Australian discussing Bruce Billson's role and the forthcoming competition review. He notes that Billson has confirmed the broad nature of the <a href="reports/2014rootbranch.html">draft terms of reference</a> was deliberate and the final TOR would be released by the end of the month and will be 'much the same'. He goes on to discuss how the review will be staffed and likely timelines. See John Durie, 'Billson packs licence to kill off any impediments' (The Australian, 9 January 2014, 13)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:42:06 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues paper: Murray Goulburn's authorisation application for acquisition of Warrnambool Cheese &amp; Butter</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC submitted an <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations/ACT-4-2013-ACCC-issues-paper.pdf" target="_blank">issues paper</a> (78 pages) regarding Murray Goulburn's <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations/ACT4-2013-Form-S-3Dec2013-redacted.pdf" target="_blank">authorisation application</a> to the Australian Competition Tribunal on 23 December 2013. This has now been made public (with significant redaction) - see <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations" target="_blank">Tribunal's Authorisation page</a> (see also <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128433/fromItemId/774397" target="_blank">ACCC page</a>). Several other statements and reports are also available (for example, affidavit of Geoffrey Carter (Minter Ellison) representing WCB, seeking permission to intervene in the proceeding (<a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/authorisations/ACT-4-2013-sealed-directions.pdf" target="_blank">granted by Justice Mansfield</a> on 9 December - para 10). For more details see, for example, Tin Binsted and Jared Lynch, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-has-concerns-over-murray-goulburns-takeover-of-wcb-20140107-30ffh.html" target="_blank">ACCC has concerns over Murray Goulburn's takeover of WCB</a>' (SMH, 8 January 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:20:02 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Privatisation, competition and the ACCC Chairman</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, caused quite a stir when he spoke to the Australian Financial Review about government's 'root and branch' competition review (see Patrick Durkin, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/accc_calls_for_big_asset_sell_off_atB9OiIob2lTqkts6kqIWN" target="_blank">ACCC calls for big asset sell off</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 6 January 2014)). This has resulted in the publication of a '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/clarification-of-accc-chairman%E2%80%99s-comments-in-the-australian-financial-review-6-january" target="_blank">clarification</a>' by the ACCC stating that, although Mr Sims said that 'generally the private sector will run commercial enterprises more efficiently than government', he made no reference 'to privatise any specific Commonwealth owned entity (the AFR refers to Australia Post and Medibank Private as examples of assets that may be privatised). </p>
            <p>For more see, for example, AAP, '<a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/accc-urges-government-to-sell-off-assets-20140106-30cd1.html" target="_blank">ACCC urges government to sell of assets</a>' (SMH, 6 January 2014) and Michael Janda &amp; Justine Parker, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-06/accc-chairman-sims-floats-privatisation-of-power-post/5185970" target="_blank">ACCC chairman Sims argues the benefits of privatisation</a>' (ABC News, 6 January 2014), Gareth Hutchens, Clay Lucas, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/accc-chairman-rod-sims-denies-urging-privatisation-of-australia-post-20140106-30dm9.html" target="_blank">ACCC chairman Rod Sims denies urging privatisation of Australia Post</a>' (SMH, 7 January 2014) and Stephen King, '<a href="http://theconversation.com/privatisation-in-australia-as-the-accc-opens-a-can-of-worms-what-are-the-lessons-on-government-ownership-and-regulation-21752" target="_blank">Privatisation in Australia: as the ACCC opens a can of worms, what are the lessons on government ownership and regulation?</a>' (The Conversation, 6 January 2014).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:19:39 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Farewell petrol discounts</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>Today the Woollies and Coles undertakings with the ACCC to stop big petrol discounts tied to supermarket purchases kicks in. For some recent aticles on this see, for example, <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=79d26dd2-0c0b-4313-ba17-e8c8a2dd8ad2" target="_blank">George Raitt, 'Bundled discounts: misuse of market power?' (Lexology, 17 December 2013)</a> and <a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/petrol-prices-set-to-reach-nearrecord-levels/story-fnihsrf2-1226792785849" target="_blank">Rose Brennan, 'Petrol prices set to reach near-record levels' (The Courier-Mail, 1 January 2014)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:19:18 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mitsubishi Electric to pay $2.2 million for RPM</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court has ordered (by consent) that Mitsubishi Electric Australia pay $2.2m in penalties for RPM. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/mitsubishi-electric-australia-to-pay-22-million-for-resale-price-maintenance" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/1413.html" target="_blank">Federal Court decision</a> (Justice Mansfield)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:19:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC conditionally approves proposed acquisition of LIfe Technologies by Thermo Fisher</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Someone went crazy in the media room at the ACCC - this is the 8th media release for the day. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-conditionally-approves-the-proposed-acquisition-of-life-technologies-by-thermo-fisher" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1129209/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a> (including <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+179573.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1129237&amp;trimFileName=D13+179573.pdfv" target="_blank">enforceable undertaking</a>).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:18:38 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not opppose Gallagher's proposed acquisition of Country Electronics</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the provision of a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+179583.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1129252&amp;trimFileName=D13+179583.pdf" target="_blank">court enforceable undertaking</a>, the ACCC will not oppose the proposed acquisiton by Gallagher Group of Country Electronics Pty Ltd. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-gallagher%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-country-electronics" target="_blank"> press release</a>. View<a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1129241/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank"> merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:18:19 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases SOI on proposed acquisiton of AAP's media monitoring business by iSentia</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+179284.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1129231&amp;trimFileName=D13+179284.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> outlining concerns with this proposed acquisition. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-statement-of-issues-on-proposed-acquisition-of-aap%E2%80%99s-media-monitoring-business-by-isentia" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1127575/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. Interested parties have until 31 January to make submissions and a final decision is due 20 February.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:17:58 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases statement of issues on Woolworths' proposed acquisition of Lindisfarne Cellars</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+11324.doc&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1129208&amp;trimFileName=MER13+11324.doc" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> setting out its concerns about the proposed acquisition of LIndifarne Cellers by Woolworths. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concerned-about-woolworths’-proposed-acquisition-of-lindisfarne-cellars" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1126958/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. Submissions are due by 17 January with proposed ACCC announcement on 13 February.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:17:37 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on BlueScope Steel's proposed acquisition of OneSteel Sheet and Coil</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+11338.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1129204&amp;trimFileName=MER13+11338.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on BlueScope Steel Ltd&rsquo;s proposed   acquisition of the OneSteel Sheet &amp; Coil business from Arrium Ltd. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-calls-for-comment-on-bluescope-steel%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-onesteel-sheet-and-coil" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1127152/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. Submissions are due by 24 January with proposed ACCC announcement on 20 February.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:17:05 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State of Competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The latest <em><a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_15_2013_Review_.pdf" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a> </em>has been published by Rachel Trindade, Alexexandra Merrett and Rhonda Smith. The theme is &quot;2013: the year of waiting patiently&quot; and it discusses the three recent Part IV decisions - Cement Australia, ANZ &amp; Flight Centre - and also devotes time to discussing (and criticising) the ACCC's 'shopper-docket' undertaking extraction from Coles and Woolworths, the new cartel cases filed by the ACCC this month, consumer protection news, 'Frankincense' (merger news!) and finally, the long awaited 'root and branch review'. Bumper issue and, as always, a must read. Past issues can be found at <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">The State of Competition home page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:12:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants authorisation for coordination of public education campaign and mandatory PIN rules</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC will allow Visa, MasterCard, American Express and participating financial institutions, to coordinate removal of signatures as authentication for most credit card transactions. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-allow-coordination-for-public-education-campaign-and-mandatory-pin-rules" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://registers.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1120516/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:10:49 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft Terms of Reference</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The draft terms of reference for the Competition Review are now available. See <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2014rootbranch.html">Root and Branch Review Page</a>. See also Anne Wardell, '<a href="http://www.lawchat.com.au/index.php/root-and-branch-review-of-competition-laws-draft-terms-of-reference-released/" target="_blank">Root and Branch' Review of Competition Laws - Draft Terms of Reference released</a>' (CCH Law Chat, 12 December 2013) (includes link to full draft). For some commentary see David Crowe, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/coalition-sides-with-small-firms-against-big-business/story-fn59niix-1226780191503#" target="_blank">Coalition sides with small firms against big business</a>' (The Australian, 11 December 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:12:33 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC takes action against NSK alleging cartel conduct</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has instituted proceedings against NSK for 'alleged cartel conduct relating to the supply of ball and roller bearings for use in motor vehicles and industrial applications.' NSK has admitted to the conduct. The case follows cooperation between competition agencies in the United States, Europe and Canada. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-nsk-for-alleged-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:21:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v Cement Australia decision</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The decision of Justice Greenwood in ACCC v Cement Australia is now <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/909.html" target="_blank">available on AustLII</a>. Justice Greenwood held that Cement Australia had breached section 45 but the ACCC was unsuccessful in its misuse of market power claim under section 46 (see <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-makes-interim-declarations-of-anticompetitive-agreements" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.) The RTF file is a whopping 25MB with the decision running to decision running to 894 pages (if you reformat to single spacing size 10 Calibri you can get it down to 539 pages ... but not so fun to read that way). Enjoy. For a brief overview see, for example, George Raitt, '<a href="http://s2.webtemplate.com.au/bridgehead/PiperAlderman/media/files/12412.pdf" target="_blank">Power without glory: ACCC v Cement Australia</a>' (Piper Alderman, Competition and Consumer News, December 2013) and Elizabeth Richmond and Alexia Smyth-Kirk, '<a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/5_december_2013/20131205/accc_v_cement_australia_another_accc_misuse_of_market_power_case_turns_to_ash.page" target="_blank">ACCC v Cement Australia: another ACCC misuse of market power case turns to ash</a>' (Clayton Utz Insights, 5 December 2013).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:12:01 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC appeals ANZ price fixing case</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>The ACCC has appealed against the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/1206.html" target="_blank">decision by Justice Dowsett in the Federal Court</a> dismissing the ACCC's allegations that the ANZ had breached price fixing provisions in the TPA (as it was at the time of the alleged contravention). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-appeals-anz-bank-decision-0" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/accc-appeals-in-anz-price-fixing-case/story-e6frfkur-1226779938075" target="_blank">ACCC appeals in ANZ price fixing case</a>' (News.com.au, 10 December 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:11:35 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v Flight Centre Ltd</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Logan in the Federal Court has handed down his decision in the ACCC v Flight Centre cartel case, holding that on six occasions Flight Centre attempted to enter agreements to 'fix, control or maintain Flight Centre's retail or distribution margin'. See ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-finds-that-flight-centre-attempted-to-enter-into-illegal-arrangements-with-airlines" target="_blank">Press Release</a>. <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/1313.html" target="_blank">Read judgment on AustLII</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:11:45 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles and Woolworths to cease supermarket subsidies for fuel discounts</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has accepted <a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca87B.html">s 87B</a> undertakings from Coles and Woolworths to 'cease making fuel saving offers which are wholly or partially funded by any part of their business other than their fuel retailing business' and to 'limit fuel discounts which are linked to supermarket purchase to a maximum of 4 cents per litre.' The undertakings note (in part) that while '[Woolworths/Coles] does not accept that any of its fuel savings offers have adversely affected competition, [Woolworths/Coles] has voluntarily and without admissions offered to provide this Undertaking to address the matters raised by the ACCC'.The undertakings also contain a meeting competition exemption. 'View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/coles-and-woolworths-undertake-to-cease-supermarket-subsidised-fuel-discounts" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128691" target="_blank">Coles Group Ltd undertaking</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1128693" target="_blank">Wooloworths Ltd undertaking</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:11:08 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Review Announced</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Government has announced that it will undertake a comprehensive review of competition laws and policy - referred to again as a 'root and branch reivew' that will 'examine not only the current laws but the broader competition framework'. The press release indicates that the government has provided states and territories with a draft terms of reference and that a review panel will be established shortly with final report to be produced within 12 months. View <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/2013-12-04/review-competition-policy" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:08:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alex Merrett's new book on Market Power</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Alexandra Merrett's book '<a href="readingroom/book2013merrett.html" target="_blank">The Assessment and Regulation of Market Power in Australia: An Institutional Approach</a>' has just been published by LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:07:12 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>In the latest issue of <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a>, Rachael Trindade, Alexandra Merrett and Rhonda Smith tackle the effects vs purpose debate in relation to misuse of market power. See '<a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_14_Effects_vs_purpose_.pdf" target="_blank">The Grass is always greener? The effects vs purpose debate resumes</a>' (The State of Competition, Issue 14 (Nov 2013). This is a bumper 8 page double issue - not to be missed!</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:06:57 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hockey rejects ADM acquisition of GrainCorp</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Treasurer, Joe Hockey, has determined that the proposed acquisition of GrainCorp by ADM would 'not be in our national interest'. In rejecting the application Hockey talked a lot about the insufficiency of competition in the sector as a justification for refusing approval. The <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119061/fromItemId/751043" target="_blank">ACCC had previously indicated it would not oppose the proposed acquisition</a>, finding that it would be 'unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition in any market'. See, for example, Ben Packham and Sue Neales, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/joe-hockey-rejects-us-takeover-of-graincorp/story-fn91vdzj-1226771002239" target="_blank">Joe Hockey rejects proposed takeover of GrainCorp by US company Archer Daniels Midland</a>' (The Australian, 29 November 2013) and Judith Ireland and Brian Robins, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/treasurer-joe-hockey-rejects-graincorp-takeover-bid-by-adm-20131129-2yf5f.html" target="_blank">Treasurer Joe Hockey rejects GrainCorp takeover bid by ADM</a>' (SMH, 29 November 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:06:36 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims on addressing market failure</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed the RBB Economics Conference in Sydney today. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-addressing-market-failure" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/keynote-address-rbb-economics-conference" target="_blank">speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:25:38 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to launch cartel case before end of year</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR reports that the ACCC is likely to launch a major cartel case before the end of the year, believed to be the largest since the 2005 Visy case. See '<a href="http://spectator01.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/11/29/economy/accc-launch-cartel-case-report" target="_blank">ACCC to launch cartel case: report</a>' (Business Spectator, 29 November 2013). See also Rod Sims' <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/keynote-address-rbb-economics-conference" target="_blank">speech to the RBB Economics Conference</a> in which he indicates he expects 'to be able to announce the commencement of another domestic cartel case before the end of the year.'</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:25:25 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC released two new PCA's</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its public competition assessments for <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1128418&amp;nodeId=79b526d3fc97998179ff396d49085a2d&amp;fn=Westfield%20Group%20and%20Westfield%20Retail%20Trust%20proposed%20acquisition%20of%20Karrinyup%20Shopping%20Centre%20-%20Shopping%20Centre%20-%2028%20November%202013.pdf" target="_blank">Westfield's proposed acquisition of Karrinyup Shopping Centre</a> (not opposed subject to divestiture) and <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1128409&amp;nodeId=ceed552aa52b5149b28c8eaf3e53869f&amp;fn=Baxter%20International%20Inc%20proposed%20acquisition%20of%20Gambro%20AB%20-%20Healthcare%20-%2028%20November%202013.pdf" target="_blank">Baxter's proposed acquisition of Gambro</a> (not opposed subject to divestiture).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:12:38 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supermarket codes</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Caron Beaton-Wells has an item in today's Conversation about the proposed supermarket code of conduct. See '<a href="http://theconversation.com/toughen-up-what-australias-supermarket-code-could-learn-from-the-uk-20764" target="_blank">Toughen up: what Australia's supermarket code could learn from the UK</a>' (The Conversation, 27 November 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:25:08 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qantas under ACCC investigation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR reports that Qantas is under ACCC investigation for potential misuse of market power in its fight with Virgin. See '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/markets/market_wrap/accc_lines_up_qantas_for_inquiry_kOQbqby5pvNpAW9YjBoBGI" target="_blank">ACCC lines up Qantas for inquiry</a>' (AFR, 21 November 2013) See also Joe Aston and James Chessell, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/aviation/qantas-under-accc-investigation-over-price-war-20131122-2xzg0.html" target="_blank">Qantas under ACCC investigation over price war</a>' (SMH, 22 November 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:24:53 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC alleges RPM by Mitsubishi</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has taken action against Mitsubishi Electric Australia alleging it engaged in reale price maintenance. See Steven Raeburn, '<a href="http://www.thedrum.com/news/2013/11/21/accc-targets-mitsubishi-over-price-fixing-concerns" target="_blank">ACCC targets Mitsubishi over price fixing concerns</a>' (The Drum, 21 November 2013). See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-files-against-mitsubishi-over-air-conditioner-pricing/story-e6frg8zx-1226764311788#mm-premium" target="_blank">ACCC files against Mitsubishi over air conditioner pricing</a>' (The Australian, 20 November 2013) and ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-institutes-proceedings-against-mitsubishi-electric-australia-for-alleged-resale-price-maintenance" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:24:29 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>King on supermarket code</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Prof Stephen King has an item in today's Conversation about the draft supermarket industry code of conduct. See '<a href="https://theconversation.com/coles-and-woolworths-code-useful-but-beware-disputes-20483" target="_blank">Coles and Woolworths code useful, but beware disputes</a>' (The Conversation, 20 November 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:24:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC funding issues</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC chairman, Rod Sims, claims the ACCC has run at a loss for the past through years as a result of increasing demands and decreased funding. See David Uren, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/sims-says-labor-caused-accc-harm-with-demands-for-efficiency-dividends/story-e6frg8zx-1226764443877" target="_blank">Sims says Labor caused ACCC harm with demands for efficiency dividends</a>' (The Australian, 20 November 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:23:57 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC finds no evidence of cartel contravention by Crown</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced that it has concluded an investigation into Crown finding there was 'insufficient evidence to support a contravention of the cartel provisions'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-statement-on-crown-echo-investigation-0" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:23:40 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court dismisses proceedings against ANZ</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court has dismissed proceedings brought by the ACCC alleging ANZ breached the price fixing provisions of the TPA (now CCA; alleged conduct occurred in 2004). In particular, the Court considered whether ANZ 'engaged in conduct that had purpose or effect,  or was likely to have purpose or effect, of fixing a rebate' and also whether the relevant conduct substantially lessened competition contrary to s 45. See <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/1206.html" target="_blank">Federal Court decision</a> (200+ pages). See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/anz-found-not-to-have-breached-price-fixing-provisions" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:23:19 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>11th Competition and Consumer Workshop</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.unisa.edu.au/Research/CRMA/Conferences-and-seminars/11th-Annual-Competition-and-Consumer-Workshop-/" target="_blank">11th Annual University of South Australia Competition and Consumer Workshop</a> was held over the weekend discussing a variety of matters likely to feature in next year's 'root and branch' review.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2013 13:22:57 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Monash Business Forum releases paper proposing issues for root and branch review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/mbpf/" target="_blank">Monash Business Forum</a> today released its '<a href="http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/mbpf/agenda.pdf" target="_blank">Agenda for National Competition Policy Inquiry</a>' in which it explores key areas the authors think should be covered in the review. In particular, it makes twelve recommendations for issues that it considers should form the basis for the Review's Terms of Reference. See also John Durie and Annabel Hepworth, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/break-up-bid-to-put-watchdog-on-leash/story-e6frf7jo-1226759338242" target="_blank">Break up bid to put watchdog on leash</a>' (The Australian, 14 November 2013, P19) and Matthew Drummond, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/australia2-0/samuel_calls_for_break_up_of_accc_wIAB0DQBBRfx28Alz7N2jO" target="_blank">Samuel calls for break-up of ACCC</a>' (The Financial Review, 14 November 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:22:34 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose NBN Co's proposed acquisition of TransACT's fibre to the premises network</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of TransACT Capital   Communications Pty Ltd&rsquo;s (TransACT) fibre to the premises network   (TransACT FTTP network) by NBN Co Limited (NBN Co)'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-nbn-cos-proposed-acquisition-of-transacts-fibre-to-the-premises-network" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1127996" target="_blank">public register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:22:19 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Online education units for tertiary institutions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its free online education units for tertiary institutions. This adds to the small business program released earlier this year. View <a href="http://www.ccaeducationprograms.org/" target="_blank">education program</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-free-online-education-units-for-tertiary-institutions" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:22:02 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bradken and Norcast settle</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Bradken has settled its federal court case appealing the <a href="cases/2013bradken.html">judgement of Justice Gordon</a> handed down earlier this year. As a result Bradken's appeal has been discontinued (Notice of Discontinuance of Appeal or Cross-Appeal filed on 4 November). See Richard Gluyas, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/bradken-case-settled-on-confidential-terms/story-fn91v9q3-1226753076250" target="_blank">Bradken case settled on confidential terms</a>' (The Australian, 5 November 2013) and '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/11/4/dataroom/bradken-norcast-reach-deal" target="_blank">Bradken, Norcast reach deal</a>' (Business Spectator, 4 November 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:21:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel calls for re-introduction of competition payments</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR reports taht former ACCC Chairman, Craeme Samuel, has called for the re-introduction fo competition payments 'to kick-start the reform agenda', noting that competition policy hs 'slipped off' the COAG reform agenda. See Mark Ludlow, Fluer Anderson and Laura Tingle, 'Competition payments required to boost reform' (AFR, 7 November 2013, page 7)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:21:20 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC investigating allegations of predatory pricing against Geelong Advertiser</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Age reports that the ACCC is investigating allegations News Corp's <em>Geelong Advertiser </em>has engaged in predatory pricing since the arrival of <em>The Weekly Review</em>, a free real estate and lifestyle magazine (owned by Metro Media Publishing - a JV between Fairfax and Antony Catalano). See Dominic White, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/accc-steps-in-to-probe-predatory-pricing-claims-20131031-2wlxk.html" target="_blank">ACCC steps in to probe predatory pricing claims'</a> (The Age, 1 November 2013). See also Dominic White, 'ACCC probes News Corp's Geelong paper' (AFR, 1 November 2013, page 6) and Noel Murphy, '<a href="http://geelong.starcommunity.com.au/indy/2013-10-31/accc-probing-news-ad-rates/" target="_blank">ACCC probing News' ad rates</a>' (Geelong Independent, 31 October 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:20:55 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases annual report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC and AER have published their <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/accc-aer-annual-report" target="_blank">2012-2013 annual report</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-and-aer-issue-joint-2012-13-annual-report" target="_blank">press release</a>. In relation to competition law, the report notes that the past 18 months have seen the largest penalties (cumulatively) for cartel conduct in the history of the ACCC (thanks to the international air cargo cartel) and refers to five competition proceedings (Renegage Gas and Speed-E-Gas (cartel allegation); Australian Arrow Pty Ltd (cartel allegation); Visa (misuse of market power allegation); Koyo (cartel allegation) and Viscas/Prysmian (cartel - penalty of $1.35million)). The report also notes current ACCC investigations into supermarket supplier arrangements, shopper dockets and fuel retailing. In relation to mergers, 73% of those considered were pre-assessed as not requiring review and of the 76 reviews conducted, six were opposed and two were resolved with remedies (page 6).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:20:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Bega Cheese's proposed acquisition of Warrnambool Cheese and Butter</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC will not oppose 'the proposed acquisition of Warrnambool Cheese and Butter Factory Company   Holdings Limited (Warrnambool Cheese and Butter) by Bega Cheese Limited   (Bega).' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-bega-cheeses-proposed-acquisition-of-warrnambool-cheese-and-butter" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1127625/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:19:40 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billson on the Supermarket Wars</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bfb.ministers.treasury.gov.au/speech/002-2013/" target="_blank">Small Business Minister Bruce Billson spoke at a food industry conference in Canberra yesterday</a>, focussing on supermarket behaviour and describing <a href="legislation/provisions/2010cca46.html">s 46</a> of the CCA as a 'hunting dog that won't leave the porch'. At the same conference ACCC chairman, Rod Sims, indicated that the ACCC's investigation into treatment of suppliers by the major supermarkets has been delayed until around March 2014 (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/thoughts-on-market-concentration-issues" target="_blank">view speech</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-chairman-addresses-supermarket-debate" target="_blank">press release</a>) and Senator Xenophon once again argued for divestiture laws in abuse of power cases. </p>
<p>See Colin Brinsden, '<a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/big-two-supermarkets-focus-of-govt-review-20131030-2wepy.html" target="_blank">Big two supermarkets focus on govt review</a>' (Sydney Morning Herald, 30 October 2013), Anna Vidot, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-30/food-and-grocery-forum-competition-law/5057728" target="_blank">Minister wants competition law with bite</a>' (ABC Rural, 30 October 2013), David Crowe, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/coalitions-warning-to-retail-giants/story-fn59niix-1226749321431#" target="_blank">Coalition's warning to retail giants</a>' (The Australian, 30 October 2013). See also '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/editorials/over-regulating-grocers-would-harm-consumers/story-e6frg71x-1226749989232" target="_blank">Over-regulating grocers would harm consumers</a>' (The Australian (Opinion), 31 October 2013) and Stephen Bartholomeusz, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/10/30/industries/beware-dead-wood-retails-root-and-branch-review" target="_blank">Beware dead wood in retail's root-and-branch review</a>' (Business Spectator, 30 October 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:19:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to reauthorise AMA to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has issued a draft determination proposing to re-authorise collective   bargaining arrangements put forward by the Australian Medical   Association (NSW) for ten years. The AMA (NSW) proposes to continue to collectively bargain on behalf   of visiting medical officers in the NSW public hospital system with the   NSW Ministry of Health and public health organisations.' View press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-reauthorise-ama-nsw-to-collectively-bargain" target="_blank">release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125775/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:18:47 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reauthorises Rural Doctors to collectively negotiate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has allowed the Rural Doctor's Association of Australia 'and its state associations to continue to collectively negotiate with   state and territory health departments, on behalf of rural doctors.' View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-reauthorises-rural-doctors-to-collectively-negotiate" target="_blank"> press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1112800/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:18:24 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Competition Assessment in Woolworths/Glenmore Ridge case</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1127550&amp;nodeId=c150c920d132857791460f931b0cf847&amp;fn=Woolworths%20Limited%20proposed%20acquisition%20of%20supermarket%20site%20at%20Glenmore%20Ridge%20Village%20Centre%20-%20Supermarket%20-%2025%20October%202013.pdf" target="_blank">Public Competition Assessment</a> in relation to the <a href="mergers/2013woolworthsglenmore.html">proposed acquisition, by Woolworths, of a supermarket site at Glenmore Ridge Village Centre</a>. It states, in part, that 'the ACCC concluded that the proposed acquisition would be likely to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the local retail supermarket market by preventing or hindering competition that would likely otherwise have been brought to the local market by an alternative supermarket operator. This competition would be unlikely to be otherwise introduced into the local market because of the lack of other available suitable sites for supermarket development' (para 60). The ACCC commenced its review of this proposed acquisition on 20 June 2012 and opposed this proposed acquisition on 5 June 2013.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:18:01 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merger authorisation update</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dave Poddar at Clifford Chance has a report on the Murray Goulburn authorisation application: '<a href="http://www.cliffordchance.com/publicationviews/publications/2013/10/too_much_froth_mergerclearancetacticsi.html" target="_blank">Too much froth? Merger clearance tactics in contested takeovers in Australia</a>' that's well worth reading. It compares the informal clearance and merger authorisation processes and looks specifically at the Australian dairy sector and the challenges of the authorisation process for Murray Goulburn.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:17:37 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merger authorisation case expected</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mgc.com.au/index.php/news/murray-goulburn-announces-cash-per-share-takeover-offer-for-warrnambool-cheese-and-butter" target="_blank">Murray Goulburn has announced</a> it intends to seek authorisation for its proposed merger with Warrnambool Cheese &amp; Butter. This will be the first merger authorisation case since the power to grant merger authorisations was removed from the ACCC and handed to the Tribunal in 2007. See Julie-Anne Sprague, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/sunday/why_warrnambool_sparked_bidding_kxxm78XXLgfsAJ6y7ARaVJ" target="_blank">Why Warrnambool sparked a bidding war</a>' (AFR 22 October 2013), Tim Binsted, '<a href="http://www.farmweekly.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/mg-to-put-case-to-tribunal/2675745.aspx" target="_blank">MG to put case to tribunal</a>' (Farm Weekly, 22 October 2013), Adele Ferguson, '<a href="http://www.businessday.com.au/business/dairy-giant-poses-as-a-national-farm-saviour-20131018-2vsh4.html" target="_blank">Dairy giant poses as a national farm saviour</a>' (Business Day, 19 October 2013) and Richasrd Gluyas, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/everyone-wants-these-happy-cows/story-e6frg9wx-1226742772789" target="_blank">Everyone wants these happy cows</a>' (The Australian, 19 October 2013).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:17:07 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$2m cartel penalty</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court has made consent orders 'against Koyo Australia Pty Ltd ordering it to pay penalties of $2 million' after finding it made and gave effect to two cartel arrangements to increase the price of ball and roller bearings. Justice Edmonds set out criteria for assessing appropriate penalties and after applying them to the case, including taking account of the substantial cost savings resulting from Koy's cooperation, accepted that the agreed pecuniary penaltiy was approriate. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/2-million-penalty-for-bearings-cartel" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2013/1051.html" target="_blank">decision (Justice Edmonds)</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:16:46 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Office Choice members and franchisers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to Office Choice members and franchisees to collectively bargain with office product suppliers. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-approval-to-office-choice-members-and-franchises" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1127067/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:16:23 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows electricity generators to jointly negotiate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has granted authorisation for power generators in Queensland to jointly renegotiate existing coal supply arrangements with Anglo Coal. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-electricity-generators-to-jointly-negotiate" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119020/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:15:36 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues PCA for Woolworths' proposed acquisition of Hawker Supa IGA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today issued its 17-page <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1127264&amp;nodeId=59754210284d52ee6d761782fd80ce22&amp;fn=Woolworths%20Limited%20proposed%20acquisition%20of%20the%20Hawker%20Supa%20IGA%20%20-%20Supermarket%20-%2017%20October%202013.pdf" target="_blank">Public Competition Assessment</a> for the <a href="mergers/2013woolworthshawker.html">proposed acquisition by Woolworths of the Hawker Supa IGA</a>, which the ACCC announced it would not oppose on 4 July.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:25:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hockey speaks to American Australian Association on 'Root and Branch' review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Treasurer Joe Hockey delivered a <a href="http://jbh.ministers.treasury.gov.au/speech/001-2013/" target="_blank">speech to the American Australian Association in New York</a> on Tuesday evening, (briefly) reiterating the government's promise of a 'root and branch review' of competition policies, emphasising need for a 'simple and predictable regulatory environment' and lightening of regulatory burden. In today's Financial Review, Fluer Anderson reports that it is now anticipated that only the terms of reference will be released within the first 100 days of the Abbott Government. (Fleur Anderson, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/complex_competition_laws_target_dxZvux1MBA17TmDhCtzY9L" target="_blank">Inquiry aims to simplify complex competition laws</a>' (AFR, 17 October 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:25:17 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stephen King on Costco's entry into petrol</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Prof Stephen King has an item in the Conversation today in which he argues that Costco's proposed entry into the discount petrol market is unlikely to benefit most consumers (see '<a href="http://theconversation.com/costcos-entry-into-petrol-is-unlikely-to-help-most-consumers-19140" target="_blank">Costco's entry into petrol is unlikely to help most consumers</a>')</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:24:53 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes conditional authorisation of APRA arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is proposing to allow APRA to continue its acquisition and licencing arrangements subject to conditions. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-changes-to-performing-rights-arrangement" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1111601/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:40:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Credit card signature authorisation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is proposing to allow Visa, MasterCard, American Express and other participating financial institutions to coordinate removal ofsignatures as an authentication method for most credit cared transactions. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-grant-authorisation-to-allow-coordination-in-relation-to-the-use-of-pins" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1120516" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:39:52 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Homeworkers Code of Practice</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has authorised a revised form of the Homeworkers Code of Practice. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-homeworkers-code-of-practice" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1103934/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:39:27 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Three more authorisation decisions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-reauthorises-concrete-cartage-allocation-system-in-perth" target="_blank">reauthorised a concrete cartage allocation system</a> in Perth and granted interim authorisation to regional councils in <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-regional-councils-in-nsw-for-waste-services-arrangements" target="_blank">NSW for waste services agreements</a> and the Queensland Government for <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-queensland-government-for-liquor-accord" target="_blank">liquor accord</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:23:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC released discussion paper in cartel immunity policy review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a public discussion paper inviting comment on issues arising from its current review of the ACCC Immunity Policy for Cartel Conduct. The closing date for submissions is 28 October. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-discussion-paper-in-cartel-immunity-policy-review" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/compliance-enforcement/immunity-policy-review/" target="_blank">consultation page</a>.  See also <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2013/10/accc-immune-review/" target="_blank"><em>In Competition </em>post</a> (by Hanna Gyton) on the discussion paper.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:18:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC updates merger process guidelines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[  <p>The ACCC has updated its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/informal-merger-review-process-guidelines-2013" target="_blank">Merger Review Process Guidelines</a>. Key changes relate to pre-assessment processes for non-contentious mergers,  feedback processes where concerns are raised and clarification of the approach to releasing Public Competition Assessments. In relation to PCA's it is notable that since the draft was released earlier this year the ACCC has re-inserted (into para 2.70) a statement that they will aim to release a PCA within 30 days of making a decision. This appeared in the previous review guidelines but did not appear in the draft revised guidelines. The ACCC has not even come close to meeting this time frame lately; for example, we are still awaiting a PCA in the controversial <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1116726/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">Woolworths/Glenmore Ridge case</a> (opposed 6 June). In the <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1094677/fromItemId/751043" target="_blank">carsales case</a> the ACCC opposed the proposed acquisition on 20 December 2012 and PCA was released 13 June 2013. The reason for the significant delays remains a mystery. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-publishes-updated-informal-merger-review-process-guidelines-0" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:56:38 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speak to International Symposium on Infrastructure</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has spoken to an International Syposium on Infrastructure noting that infrastructure is a key enabler of productivity growth. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/efficient-infrastructure-regulation-and-rules-%E2%80%93-key-to-productivity-gains" target="_blank">press release</a>.<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/a-future-regulatory-outlook" target="_blank"> View speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:20:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Car parts price fixing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There were a number of reports yesterday relating to the international probe into car parts price fixing. Discussing cartel activity generally Sims also noted that it has received about 100 immunity applications since the immunity policy (currently under review) was introduced five years ago. See, for example, Amy Bainbridge, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-28/accc-receiving-immunity-applications-for-cartel-investigations/4985906" target="_blank">ACCC plays a role in busting car parts price-fixing cartels</a>' (ABC News, 28 September 2013).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 09:18:22 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petrol discounts - are they forcing small petrol stations out?</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ABC factcheck has an item on petrol shopper dockets - '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-25/fuel-shopper-dockets-independent-retailers/4977164" target="_blank">Are the big chains' discoutn vouchers forcing small petrol stations out of business?</a>' (ABC Factcheck, 25 September 2013), reporting on an advertisement placed by the Independent Retailers of Australia in the Fin Review on 19 September 2013.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:18:04 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: Competition provisions in trade agreements benefit region</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed a Regional Cmprehensive Economic Partnership seminar in Brisbane today discussing competition provisions in trade agreements. The speech has not been published. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/competition-provisions-in-trade-agreements-benefit-region" target="_blank">press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:13:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves Emerald's wheat port access</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC  has accepted an access undertaking from Emerald Logistics regarding bulk wheat exporters using its Melbourne   Port Terminal. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-approves-emeralds-wheat-port-access-arrangements" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/wheat-export/emerald-logistics-2013/final-decision" target="_blank">final decision</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:16:09 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel: Take politics out of competition law</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel appeared on ABC Rural today discussing the proposed root and branch review of competition law. He welcomes the review but says a overhaul is not needed. In particular is warned against politicising competition law reform. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-25/competition-law-graeme-samuel/4979998" target="_blank">Anna Vidot, 'Take politics out of competition law: ex-ACCC boss'</a> (ABC Rural, 25 September 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:17:44 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grant interim authorisation to Myer</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to Myer to enable it to continue to invite businesses within its stores to participate in promotions. A draft decision on the full application is anticipated in November. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-myer-for-coordinated-promotions" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1125791" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:11:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises voluntary code of conduct for solar retail businesses</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has granted authorisation for five years to Clean Energy Council Ltd for a voluntary code of conduct for solar photovoltaic retail businesses. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-a-voluntary-code-of-conduct-for-solar-retail-businesses" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1108396/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:10:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN Co Board resigns</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The entire board (bar one) of NBN Co has resigned, although (at 11am September) they have not yet been accepted by the Government. See ABC, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-23/nbn-co-board-offers-to-resign/4973922" target="_blank">All but one NBN Co board member hand in resignations</a>'. See also <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/9/23/information-technology/nbn-board-has-run-away-why" target="_blank">Alan Kohler, 'The NBN board has run away. Why?' (Business Spectator, 23 September 2013)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:07:40 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC varies Facilities Access Code</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has varied the Facilities Access Code following a review which commenced in July 2012. Most notably, timeframes for accessing facilities are now mandadory. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-varies-the-facilities-access-code" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=723176" target="_blank">revised code</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:06:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No rush for competition review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR has an item today on the Government's promised root and branch competition review. See Tony Boyd, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/chanticleer/slow_start_to_billson_competition_A1Cks85FCwZgwKCSwomG9I" target="_blank">Slow start to Billson's competition review</a>' (AFR, 20 September 2013, page 40). The item suggests Billson will favour an economist over a lawyer to dead the review which is expected to be assested by experts 'repreenting farmers, small business and consumers'. This follows an item on the 10th reporting that Billson had indicated that terms of reference have already been drawn up: Claire Stewart, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/billson_pledges_comprehensive_competition_vlst86mzyy8QN6Rl0YS18O" target="_blank">Billson pledges 'comprehensive' competition review</a>' (AFR, 10 Sept 2013, page 3). See also James Thomson, '<a href="http://www.brw.com.au/p/business/billson_ready_for_business_in_new_8bvb6d3klKsTwbS2nkOZJO" target="_blank">Billson ready for business in new ministerial role</a>' (BRW, 17 September 2013) (suggesting Billson will get his 'root-and-branch' review going as soon as possible following consultation on terms of reference.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:07:12 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Annual Baxt Lecture</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://tinyurl.com/baxt2014" target="_blank">annual Baxt lecture</a> was delivered today by Professor Frederick Hilmer AO, the architect of the National Competition Policy. The topic "National Competition Policy Turns 21: An Occasion to Celebrate" was highly topical given the 'Son of Hilmer' Review promised by the new Government within its first 100 days.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> slides and handout ('National Competition Policy: Coming of Age') now available from the link above, with audio to follow.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:20:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes fee arrangements by ophthalmologists</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has opposed the setting of common fees for ophthalmology practices within shared practices. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-opposes-fee-arrangements-by-ophthalmologists" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1104670/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:05:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State of Competition: Competitive Neutrality</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Alexandra Merrett and Rachel Trindade have released Issue 13 of <em><a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a></em> - this issue's subject is competitive neutrality. Read '<a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_13_competitive_neutrality_.pdf" target="_blank">Has competitive neutrality run its course?</a>'. The authors have also promised discussion of the always topical 'section 46' in the next issue.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:20:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No competition minister</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite <a href="http://brucebillson.com.au/Media/MediaReleases/tabid/67/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/553/The-Coalition-national-strategy-to-restore-small-business-hope-reward-and-opportunity.aspx" target="_blank">talk of a root and branch review</a> of competition laws for more than a year, <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/168478869/Tony-Abbott-s-first-Ministry" target="_blank">no competition minister</a> appears in the new cabinet, outer ministry or among the various parliamentary secretaries. As expected, <a href="http://brucebillson.com.au/" target="_blank">Bruce Billson</a> is the new Minister for Small Business. He was the Shadow Minister for Small Business, <em><strong>Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs</strong></em>. Gone are the competition and consumer references. Let us hope the coalition does not believe the latter can be simply conflated into the category of small business - although the title change and <a href="http://lpaweb-static.s3.amazonaws.com/13-08-19%20The%20Coalition%E2%80%99s%20Policy%20for%20Small%20Business.pdf" target="_blank">August small business policy paper</a> suggest otherwise. Yesterday I pointed to <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2013/09/coalition-uproot-competition-laws/" target="_blank">K&amp;W Mallesons' In Competition Blog</a> which expressed the view that the 'Coalition&rsquo;s stated focus on the position of small business suggests a   move away from the protection of the competitive process to the   protection of the competitors.' Let us hope they are not too prophetic ...</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:20:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts on a root and branch review of competition laws</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>With the coalition's election victory it looks likely we will see a &quot;root and branch&quot; review of competition laws in the next 12 months. Peta Sevenson anmd Martine Phillips have posted on the proposed review over at King&amp;Wood Mallesons' <em>In Competition Blog </em>- see '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2013/09/coalition-uproot-competition-laws/" target="_blank">Coalition to Uproot Competition Laws?</a>' (9 September 2013). </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:09:14 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will seek to join in Bradken appeal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC will seek leave to join the <a href="cases/2013bradken.html">Bradken appeal against Justice Gordon's cartel ruling</a> earlier this year. See ACCC Press Release, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-leave-to-intervene-in-bradken-limited-ors-v-norcast-sarl" target="_blank">ACCC seeks leave to intervene in Bradken Limited &amp; Ors V Norcast S.ar.L</a>' (12 September 2013). 'See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/bernie-brookes-is-paddling-madly-against-the-tide/story-e6frg9io-1226718020899" target="_blank">Bernie Brookes is paddling madly against the tide</a>' (The Australian, 13 September 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:11:42 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow electricity generators to jointly negotiate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is proposing to allow Qld power generators to jointly renegotiate coal supply arrangements with Aglo Coal. Submissions on <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+126754.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1125874&amp;trimFileName=D13+126754.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a> can be made until 26 September. Final decision expected in October. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-electricity-generators-to-start-joint-negotiations" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119020/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:11:23 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not opposed proposed acquisition by AGL of Australia Power and Gas</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition by AGL Energy Limited (AGL) of Australian Power and Gas Company Limited (APG)'. View <a href="ACCC to not oppose the proposed acquisition by AGL of Australian Power and Gas" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125838/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:11:04 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Clubs Australia</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+126248.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1125793&amp;trimFileName=D13+126248.pdf" target="_blank">granted interim authorisation</a> to Clubs Australia to negotiate with suppliers of ATM's. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-clubs-australia" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View authorisation <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125067/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:10:44 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cement Australia decision handed down - no go on s 46 claim</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court has handed down its decision in ACCC v Cement Australia, finding that Cement Australia had breached section 45. The ACCC was, however, unsuccessful in its misuse of market power claim under section 46. See, for example, John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/mixed-success-in-accc-case-against-cement-australia/story-fn91v9q3-1226716172096" target="_blank">Mixed success in ACCC case against Cement Australi</a>a' (The Australian, 10 September 2013) and Global Cement, '<a href="http://www.globalcement.com/news/item/1927-australia-cement-broke-competition-law-with-fly-ash-contract" target="_blank">Australia Cement broke competition law with fly ash contract</a>' (10 September 2013). The full decision (apparently around 500 pages) has not yet been published.  See also <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-makes-interim-declarations-of-anticompetitive-agreements" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:48:40 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claims ACCC is investigating egg prices for possible price fixing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Australian Financial Review (Matthew Drummond, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/9/9/agribusiness/accc-acts-egg-producers-report" target="_blank">ACCC acts on egg industry cartel accusation</a>', 10 Sept 2013 (page 3)), the ACCC is investigating whether large egg producers have been manipulating prices. See also Richard Gluyas, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/watchdog-is-aiming-to-get-a-fix-on-the-price-of-eggs/story-e6frg8zx-1226715504935" target="_blank">Watchdog is aiming to get a fix on the price of eggs</a>' (The Australian, 10 September 2013) and '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/9/9/agribusiness/accc-acts-egg-producers-report" target="_blank">ACCC acts on egg producers: report</a>' (Business Spectator, 9 September 2013).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:48:15 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alex Merrett on shopper dockets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Alexandra Merrett has a piece in the Australian on shopper dockets and whether they are anti-competitive. <a href="http://theconversation.com/are-shopper-dockets-anti-competitive-good-luck-proving-it-17499" target="_blank">See 'Are shopper dockets anti-competitive? Good luck proving it</a>' (The Conversation, 5 September 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:47:42 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New ICN Chair</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[   <p>The <a href="http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/" target="_blank">International Competition Network</a> has elected a new Chair, Andreas Mundt (current <a href="http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/wEnglisch/News/press/2013_09_05.php" target="_blank">President of Germany's Bundeskartellamt</a>). He takes over from <a href="http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/library/doc922.pdf" target="_blank">Eduardo Perez Motta</a> (Head of the Mexican Federal Competition Commission). There are currently 126 member agencies of the ICN. View statement by <a href="http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/library/doc924.pdf" target="_blank">Andreas Mundt</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:46:47 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speaks to American Chamber of Commerce</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke to the American Chamber of Commerce in Melbourne today, outlining the key functions of the ACCC and major issues currently confronting the ACCC. In it, he notes (again!) that the ACCC will be taking more competition cases in future and highlights the ACCC's recent involvement in merger activity (including the flurry of merger announcements in the past couple of days). View press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-plays-fundamental-role-in-our-market-economy" target="_blank">release</a> (full speech not yet available)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:31:03 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose Air NZ's proposed acquisition of 6% of Virgin</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Air New Zealand Limited (Air New Zealand) of an additional 6 per cent of Virgin Australia Holdings Pty Ltd (Virgin).' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-not-to-oppose-air-new-zealand%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-6-of-virgin" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1125524" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:30:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More merger divestiture remedies as ACCC indicates it will not oppose proposed Karrinyup Shopping Centre acquisition following divestiture remedy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Karrinyup Shopping Centre by Westfield Group (Westfield) and Westfield Retail Trust (WRT) after accepting a court enforceable undertaking to divest their ownership of a nearby shopping centre at Innaloo'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-proposed-acquisition-of-karrinyup-shopping-centre-following-divestiture-remedy" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125510" target="_blank">merger register</a> (including <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+7532.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1125558&amp;trimFileName=MER13+7532.pdf" target="_blank">s 87B undertaking (redacted)</a>). The ACCC has indicated a public competition assessment will be published in due course)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:30:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose proposed global acquisition of Gambro by Baxter, subject to divestiture remedy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Gambro AB by Baxter International Inc. after accepting an undertaking from Baxter to sell part of its Renal Replacement Therapy business.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-proposed-global-acquisition-of-gambro-by-baxter-following-divestiture-remedy" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125496/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a> (including <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1125491&amp;nodeId=84606bcb4459a5c2cdbe3504901098b8&amp;fn=s87B%20Undertaking%20-%20Baxter%20International%20Inc%20-%20signed%203%20September%202013.pdf" target="_blank">s 87B undertaking</a>). The ACCC has indicated a public competition assessment will be published in due course)</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:29:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to reauthorise concrete cartage allocation system in Perth</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'issued a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1118332/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to allow Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd to continue to operate its concrete cartage allocation system.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-reauthorise-concrete-cartage-allocation-system-in-perth" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:29:25 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC conditionally reauthorises Virgin and Air NZ alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has issued a final determination granting conditional authorisation until 31 October 2018 for Virgin Australia and Air New Zealand Limited to continue their trans-Tasman alliance'. Commissioner Dr Jill Walker stated that the ACCC 'considers that the alliance is likely to result in material public benefits by partnering Virgin Australia’s domestic Australian network and sales presence with Air New Zealand’s domestic New Zealand network and sales presence to contribute to the formation of a second integrated Australasian network'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-conditionally-reauthorises-virgin-and-air-new-zealand-trans-tasman-alliance" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1106131/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. See further, Kim de Kock (King&amp;Wood Mallesons), '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2013/09/virgin-air-nz-cleared-take/" target="_blank">Virgin and Air NZ Cleared for Further Take Off</a>' (4 September 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:29:02 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims concerned with Qantas' price war comments</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC's Rod Sims has expressed concern about comments made by Qantas boss Alan Joyce regarding capacity in the market. See John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/qantass-alan-joyce-hits-raw-nerve-at-accc-with-capacity-comments/story-e6frg9io-1226709666307" target="_blank">Qantas's Alan Joyce hits raw nerve at ACCC with capacity </a>comments' (The Australian, 3 September 2013); Adele Ferguson, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/watchdog-queries-qantas-comments-20130902-2t10z.html" target="_blank">Watchdog queries Qantas comments</a>' (The Age, 3 September 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:28:43 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks views on Viterra's Port Terminal Access Arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'invites submissions from interested parties in the bulk wheat export industry on Viterra&rsquo;s application to extend and vary its 2011 Port   Terminal Services Access Undertaking.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-views-on-viterra%E2%80%99s-port-terminal-access-arrangements" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/regulated-infrastructure/wheat-export/viterra-2011/further-application-to-vary#public-consultation-regarding-the-proposed-extension-and-variation" target="_blank">issues paper</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:28:22 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate committee wants review of GrainCorp approval</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A Senate committee (Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee), chaired by Bill Heffernan, released an <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=rrat_ctte/grain_handling/interim_report02/index.htm" target="_blank">Interim Report on 30 August</a> calling on the ACCC to reopen is review of the proposed takeover of <a href="http://www.graincorp.com.au/" target="_blank">GrainCorp</a> by <a href="http://www.adm.com/" target="_blank">Archer Daniels Midland</a>, which <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119061/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">it indicated it will not oppose in 27 June 2013</a>. The 59 page report claims the ACCC did not 'have the necessary expertise to undertake a full and proper review of ADM's bid' and did not 'obtain independent expert advice or assistance' (para 2.33). It further states that 'the committee has significant doubts about the competition regulator's understanding of the grain sector or the implications of ADM's bid' (para 2.39) and that 'the importance of the grains industry to Australian farmers and to the national economy warranted a closer and more informed inspection by the ACCC.' (para 2.42) In particular, the committee expressed the view that the 'current cross-ownership arrangements in the Australian grain handling market were not properly considered in the [ACCC's] informal review of the takeover bid.' (para 4.2). </p>
<p>Specifically, the Senate Committee recommended: (1) that the ACCC re-open its informal review of ADM's proposed acquisition of GrainCorp and obtain independent expert advice when conducting that review; (2) that the <a href="http://www.firb.gov.au/" target="_blank">Foreign Investment Review Board</a> (FIRB) consider evidence from the committee's hearings, potential loss of taxpayer revenie, the potential for the takover to 'distort the capital market to the detriment of Australian farmers and Australia's economy due to food security concerns' and the need to 'protect the public interest and the interests of grain growers' when making its recommendation to the Treasurer.</p>
<p>See also, Michael Whitbourne, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/sunday/graincorp_inquiry_hears_of_intimidation_Nb4Z2YMaPg8OCNv4KVOR3K" target="_blank">GrainCorp inquiry hears of intimidation tactics</a>' (AFR, 16 July 2013), '<a href="http://www.therural.com.au/story/1746441/senate-calls-for-more-scrutiny-of-archer-daniels-midland/?cs=1532" target="_blank">Senate calls for more scrutiny of Archer Daniels Midland</a>' (The Rural, 2 September 2013), David Stringger, '<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-30/adm-s-offer-for-graincorp-needs-more-scrutiny-lawmakers-say.html" target="_blank">ADM’s Offer for GrainCorp Needs More Scrutiny, Lawmakers Say</a>' (Bloomberg, 30 August 2013) and Business Spectator, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/senate-baulks-at-graincorp-takeover/story-fn91v9q3-1226707876881" target="_blank">Senate baulks at GrainCorp takeover</a>' (31 August 2013).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:05:21 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose proposed acquisition by Woolworths of Queensland Supa IGA's</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Woolworths Limited (Woolworths) of three Supa IGA supermarkets, located in Queensland' (Banksia Beach, Rasmussena nd Riverside Gardens), concluding that despite 'Woolworths’ increase in market share, it would remain constrained by other supermarkets in the local markets with different offerings'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-the-proposed-acquisition-by-woolworths-of-three-queensland-supa-igas" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125286/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:12:13 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases public competition assessment for Sonic Healthcare</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its public competition assessment relating to its decision to opose the proposed acquisition by Sonic Healthcare of the pathology business of Healthscope Limited in Queensland and its decision not to oppose Sonic's proposed acquistion of the pathology business of Healthscope in Western Australia. The PCA comes more than 10 months after the ACCC announced its decision. <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1084137/fromItemId/751043" target="_blank">View Merger Register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:44:03 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose APA proposed acquisition of Enestra</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has indicated it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by APA Group of Envestra LIimited. The competition analysis states that, in relation to concerns about vertical integration 'APA's ability to engage in foreclosure strategies was limited by pricing   regulation that applied to the Adelaide distribution network [and] the proposed acquisition was unlikely to provide   APA with the incentive to foreclose rivals by providing discounts to (or   otherwise favour) customers using the SEAgas instead of the competing   Moomba to Adelaide pipeline in order to stimulate additional volumes   over SEAgas. ...'. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1125240/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:43:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to reauthorise collective negotiation by rural doctors</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+119575.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1125271&amp;trimFileName=D13+119575.pdf" target="_blank">draft decision</a> proposing to allow the Rural Doctors Association of Australia and its state associations 'continue to collectively negotiate with state and territory health departments, on behalf of rural doctors.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-reauthorise-collective-negotiations-by-rural-doctors" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1112800/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:21:58 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supermarket power and politics</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Supermarket power is in the media again, with Malcolm Turnbull stating yesterday that he believed the leverage of the major supermarkets is 'without precedent anywhere else in the world' and their dominance 'extraordinary'. The coalition has re-iterated its promise to conduct a 'root and branch' review of competition law if elected. See <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-27/nrn-supermarkets-turnbull/4915322" target="_blank">Anna Vidot, 'Supermarkts have 'extraordinary' power: Turnbull' (ABC Rural, 27 August 2013)</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:59:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oligopoly Economy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There is an item in today's Australian by Damon Kitney and Andrew White - '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/we-are-an-oligopoly-economy-robb/story-fn91v9q3-1226699531519" target="_blank">We are an oligopoly economy: Robb</a>', describing opposition finance spokesman, Andrew Robb's, statements at the Global Food Forum series in Sydney, that Australians 'should not be opposed to create national champion's and claiming 'Australians need to accept that the nation is an &quot;oligopoly economy&quot;'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:59:17 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases June 2013 quarterly report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/publications/acccount/acccount-1-april-to-30-june-2013" target="_blank">latest quarterly report</a>. It notes, amongst other things, that the ACCC pre-assessed 87 potential mergers and reviewed 22 in the June quarter, including Virgin's acquisition of a stake in Tiger. Of these, two were opposed outright, in three the ACCC expressed concerns and in two cases variations to undertakings were accepted (the stat's on page 7 appear slightly out). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-june-2013-quarterly-report" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:58:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes not to accept Emerald wheat port access undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=964331" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing not to accept Emerald Logistic Services Pty Ltd's proposed wheat port access undertaking; however a draft revised undertaking drafted by Emerald addresses ACCC concerns and, if re-submitted in that form, the ACCC is likely to accept it. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-draft-decision-on-emerald-wheat-port-access-undertaking" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:58:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims' Law Council speech</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims' <a href="readingroom/2013sims-lca.html">address to the Law Council of Australia's</a> Competition and Consumer Workshop is <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/chairmans-address-law-council-of-australia" target="_blank">now available from the ACCC website</a>. In it, he provides a tribute to Ron Bannerman, sets out regulatory issues for 2013, discusses the review of the Merger Review Process Guidelines, talks about compliance and enforcement, addresses some consumer issues and discusses ACCC engagement in the region. </p>
<blockquote>
  <p><strong>Mergers: </strong>In relation to mergers Sims noted that the ACCC's 'main focus will be on a real world understanding of market structure and   import competition, entry barriers, countervailing power and the   overall competition process' rather than 'complex theories and detailed modelling'. He also noted that the ACCC was 'close to finalising the revised Process Guidelines', noting one of the key changes was to move away from the practice of setting 6-8 week standard review periods for all public merger reviews, noting that in complex cases reviews will often take longer than eight weeks and that in some cases review periods will be extended to coordinate reviews with other agencies. Sims also acknowledged concerns about the timeframes for publishing public competition assessments, noting that the ACCC has 'undertaken steps internally to streamline our processes for preparing PCAs' and will aim to publish within 30 days of announcing its final decision.</p>
  <p><strong>Compliance and enforcement: </strong>Sims noted that the ACCC wins around 80 per cent of cases it takes. Focus is consumer law, but Sims also focussed a lot on the 'largest penalties for cartel conduct in the history of the ACCC' - this is cumulatively and relates to the international air cargo cartel, for which many regulators can claim success. Sims also noted there had been five competition proceedings instituted in the 2011-2012 financial year (four alleging cartels and one (against Visa) alleging misuse of market power and exclusive dealing). Once again Sims promised more competition cases in the coming year. Sims also spoke about the ACCC's review of its immunity policy for cartel conduct, which he anticipates will be finalised in the coming months, with a discussion paper to be released in September.</p>
  <p><strong>International engagement: </strong>Sims noted that ACCC efforts to maximise engagement in the Asian region are continuing and that the ACCC will host the ICN annual conference in 2015.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:06:58 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petrol wars and predatory pricing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Michael Bradley and Kiran Bath from Marque Lawyers have written a brief piece on '<a href="http://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/256960/Trade+Regulation+Practices/Petrol+wars+and+predatory+pricing+the+ACCCs+latest+rant+on+the+mega+grocer+duopoly" target="_blank">Petrol wars and predatory pricing - the ACCC's latest rant on the mega merger duopoly</a>'. Available from Mondaq and well worth reading.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:34:21 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Watchdog eyes supermarket muscle</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Damien Carrick's <em>The Law Report</em> on Tuesday focussed on the ACCC's investigations into the Australian supermarket industry. <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lawreport/watchdog-eyes-supermarket-muscle/4871592" target="_blank">Download audio and view related article</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 11:09:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gilbert+Tobin State of M&amp;A</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Gilbert + Tobin have released their '<a href="http://www.gtlaw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/State-of-the-MA-Nation-2013-mid-year-update.pdf" target="_blank">State of the M&amp;A Nation 2013 Mid-Year Update</a>' in which they observe (as others have) that the timeline for mergers requiring ACCC approval 'seem to be getting longer', with complex transactions expected to take approximately 26 weeks or more to review. They observe, however, that this has not led to increased oppositions, alathough there is a clear reluctance to approve mergers in concentrated industries. The report also discusses the impact of cross-border mergers requiring clearance in China; in particular, low threshold triggers and a 'notoriously slow' clearance process.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:13:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Westfield's proposed Karrinyup acquisition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ben Wilmot has a piece in today's Australian on Westfield's proposed acquisition of the Karrinyup Shopping Centre: '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/property/westfield-push-for-control-in-perth/story-fn9656lz-1226693031107" target="_blank">Westfield push for control in Perth</a>' (8 August 2013). The ACCC commenced an initial review back in August 2011 which was suspended in December that year and a new informal review commenced 22 July 2013. <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+6350.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1122983&amp;trimFileName=MER13+6350.pdf" target="_blank">Market Inquiry letters</a> were sent on 25 July and interested parties have until tomorrow (9 August) to make submissions. View the <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1122761/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC's merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:25:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International price discrimination and parallel importing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mark McCowan and Alistair Newton from Corrs have a Mondaq piece <a href="http://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/256176/Cartels+Monopolies/International+price+discrimination+and+parallel+importing+time+to+take+a+deep+breath" target="_blank">on 'International price discrimination and parallel importing - Time to take a deep breath</a>'. It is well worth reading.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:33:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reviews Envestra bid</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1123113/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC commenced a review</a> of APA's bid for pipeline distributor, Envestra Ltd, on 26 July. <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+6566.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1123575&amp;trimFileName=MER13+6566.pdf" target="_blank">Market inquiry letters</a> were sent on 31 July and interested parties are invited to commend by 14 August. A decision is anticipated on 5 September. Matt Chambers has an item on the review in today's Australian: <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/envestra-bid-in-acccs-sights/story-fn91v9q3-1226691704210" target="_blank">'Envestra bid in ACCC's sights'</a> (The Australian, 6 July 2013). </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 09:12:31 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims says cut grocery prices not petrol</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Matthew Drummond has a piece today ('<a href="http://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/cut-prices-not-petrol-accc/2666777.aspx" target="_blank">Cut prices not petrol: ACCC</a>' (AFR, 5 August 2013)) discussing Sims' comments on supermarket and shopper dockets and the lengthy decision making process for Telstra's bid for Adam Internet.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 09:12:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interview with Rod Sims</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fairfax media has posted its full interview with Rod Sims online. The video runs for just over 25 minutes. <a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/sunday/full_interview_accc_rod_sims_Ho568abfC3i6i3RscUUeuK" target="_blank">View here</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2013 11:41:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rod Sims, two years on ...</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fairfax media's Ruth Williams has an item today on Chairman Rod Sims - '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/competition-boss-wears-frustrations-of-his-post-lightly-20130802-2r4zp.html" target="_blank">Competition boss wears frustrations of his post lightly</a>'. It's a (relatively) lengthy piece covering Sims' two years at the helm of the ACCC.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 10:53:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supermarket Power in Australia</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today a <a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/clen/news-and-events/supermarket-power-symposium/flushcache/1/showdraft/1" target="_blank">Public Symposium on Supermarket Power in Australia</a> was held in Melbourne. The Symposium, organised by University of Melbourne's <a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/competition-law-and-economics-network" target="_blank">Competition Law &amp; Economics Network</a> and Monash University's <a href="http://www.law.monash.edu.au/centres/regstudies/" target="_blank">Centre for Regulatory Studies</a>, explored a wide range of issues arising from the structure of Australia's supermarket industry. The first sessions were devoted to industry structure and competition law issues, with a fascinating firstsession from Craig Woolford from Citi on <em>Trends in the Australian Grocery Sector</em>.  This was followed by sessions from <a href="experts/merrett-alexandra.html">Dr Alexandra Merrett</a>, former ACCC Chairman, <a href="experts/samuel-graeme.html">Graeme Samuel</a> and former ACCC Mergers Commissioner, <a href="experts/king-stephen.html">Professor Stephen King</a> assessing the state of competition in the supermarket industry in Australia and then by sessions from <a href="http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/about/staff/profile.php?cn=harmen-oppewal" target="_blank">Professor Harmen Oppewal</a> and <a href="http://www.addleshawgoddard.com/view.asp?content_id=5194&amp;parent_id=1242" target="_blank">Ms Rona Bar-Isaac</a> offering some UK perspectives, including a video (available <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iA0S6tF4Pk" target="_blank">on YouTube</a>) from new UK Groceries Code Adjudicator <a href="http://www.christinetacon.com/" target="_blank">Ms Christine Tacon</a>. Post lunch sessions deviated from a competition focus, addressing broader social issues surrounding the supermarket industry and the final session returned to a competition focus with <a href="http://peter-whish-wilson.greensmps.org.au/" target="_blank">Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilso</a>n outlining the <a href="http://peter-whish-wilson.greensmps.org.au/content/media-releases/greens-taking-action-tackle-supermarket-power-australia" target="_blank">Greens' approach to competition in retailing</a>. Plenty of media. See, for example, AAP, '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/national/supermarkets-are-competitive-ex-accc-head/story-e6frfku9-1226689655015" target="_blank">Supermarkets are competitive: ex-ACCC head</a>' (news.com.au 1 August 2013) Rob Harris, '<a href="http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2013/08/01/578467_politics-news.html" target="_blank">Greens want to tackle supermarket duopoly</a>' (Weekly Times, 1 August 2013), Matthew Drummond, '<a href="http://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/samuel-ups-ante-on-supermarkets/2666471.aspx" target="_blank">Samuel ups ante on supermarkets</a>' (The Land, 2 August 2013), Cameron Wilson, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/bushtelegraph/supermarket-power/4853602" target="_blank">Supermarkets under the spotlight</a>' (Bush Telegraph, 1 August 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:10:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Greens release competition policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://peter-whish-wilson.greensmps.org.au/" target="_blank">Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilso</a>n outlined the <a href="http://peter-whish-wilson.greensmps.org.au/content/media-releases/greens-taking-action-tackle-supermarket-power-australia" target="_blank">Greens' approach to competition in retailing</a> (see also PDF <a href="http://peter-whish-wilson.greensmps.org.au/sites/default/files/effective_competition_policy.pdf" target="_blank">policy outline</a>) at today's <a href="http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/clen/news-and-events/supermarket-power-symposium/flushcache/1/showdraft/1" target="_blank">Public Symposium on Supermarket Power in Australia</a> in Melbourne. It comes as no big surprise that the focus is supermarket. The policy states that it will:</p>
<ul>
  <li>placing a temporary ban on expansion by Coles and Woolworths, while the ACCC 'carries out an ex-post assessment into their decisions relating to the grocery market';</li>
  <li>prevent ' the supermarket duopoly from purchasing agricultural land, to ensure they aren’t able to completely control the whole supply chain'; </li>
  <li>strengthen competition law 'to ensure companies are unable to abuse their market power, including giving the ACCC broad divestiture powers' which would allow them to 'split up companies who have too much market power'. Related to this, the policy states that it will outlaw price discrimination and introduce an effects test for misuse of market power (some of the many reasons for not doing this were expressed at the Symposium)</li>
  <li>extend the 'Australian Consumer Law framework dealing with unfair contract terms to business-to-business agreements involving small business and farmers';</li>
  <li>increase ' the resources and effectiveness of Australia’s competition watchdog ACCC' (including by providing the ACCC with a 50% incease ($100m) over current legal expense budget.</li>
</ul>
<p>See, for example, Rob Harris, '<a href="http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2013/08/01/578467_politics-news.html" target="_blank">Greens want to tackle supermarket duopoly</a>' (Weekly Times, 1 August 2013) and Alanand Peter Martin, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/greens-set-to-take-on-supermarket-giants-20130731-2qzsn.html" target="_blank">Greens set to take on supermarket giants</a>' (Sydney Morning Herald, 31 July 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:07:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC farewells Ron Bannerman</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a statement paying tribute to Ron Bannerman, former Chairman of the Trade Practices Commission, who passed away last Saturday. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-says-farewell-to-ronald-moore-bannerman-ao" target="_blank">'ACCC says farewell to Ronald Moore Bannerman AO' (31 July 2013)</a>. For more detail on the role of Ron Bannerman in the development of Australian competition policy see also <a href="readingroom/2007merrett-bannerman.html" target="_blank">David Merrett, Stephen Corones and David Round, 'The introduction of competition policy in Australia: the role of Ron Bannerman' (2007) 47(2) <em>Australian Economic History Review </em>178-199</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:05:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Virgin/Tiger PCA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has now released the <a href="mergers/2013virgintiger.html">Virgin/Tiger Airways</a> Public Competition Assessment, just over three months after it announced its decision not to oppose the Virgin's 60% acquisition of Tiger Airways.  View the <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1110182/fromItemId/751043" target="_blank">merger register, including PCA</a>. Last week the ACCC also released the PCA for the Heinz proposed acquisition of Rafferty's Garden, which it announced it would not oppose on 6 June 2013. <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1116713/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">View merger register and PCA</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:05:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC press release on shopper dockets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a press release noting concerns expressed by Chairman Rod Sims about the escalating shopper docket petrol discounts. At a speech to the Australian Institute of Company Directors, Sims stated that the 'ACCC believes this activity is likely to have a negative impact on competition in the petrol industry' and is 'investigating whether the duration, frequency and extent of these fuel offers may have an adverse impact on the underlying level of fuel prices'. The press release also notes that the ACCC ivnestigation into shopper dockets by major supermarkets (which commenced mid-2012) is 'nearing completion' and will be finalised in the next few months. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-concerned-about-escalating-shopper-docket-discounts" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:05:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Xenophon getting excited about competition policy again</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nick Xenophon is once again getting excited about competition law issues. This week he's targetting fuel discounters and Apple. See, for example, David Firth, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/opinion/nick-xenophon-sets-accc-tentacles-on-e-books/story-e6frgb0o-1226683328490" target="_blank">Nick Xenophon sets ACCC tentacles on e-books</a>' (The Australian, 23 July 2013, reporting that the ACCC has turned down Xenophon's request to investigate the pricing of electronic books in Australia and suggesting Xenophon petition the ACCC to investigate the price of Aussie seafood instead ...), '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/technology/nick_xenophon_calls_for_probe_on_drQhm5jMPoqJfI4xYgqKlK" onmousedown="return rwt(this,'','','','5','AFQjCNHwjNX-ga18qi9aDCVGGOdgg2Q8Ww','3HI1Rm6k1xPfpbDAxB4Omw','0CDMQqQIoADAE','','',event)">Nick <em>Xenophon</em> calls for probe on Apple e-book 'rip-off'</a>', AAP, <a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/7/19/retail/xenophon-slams-fuel-discounts" target="_blank">'Xenophon slams fuel discounts</a>' (Business Spectator, 19 July 2013). He is also still pretty excited about supermarkets - see the transcript from his appearance on <a href="http://www.nickxenophon.com.au/media/transcripts/show/the-project/" target="_blank">The Project</a>, 18 June 2013 discussing his '<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5097" target="_blank">Reducing Supermarket Dominance Bill</a>' (in which he describes teaming up with Bob Katter as a 'bromance' ...).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:56:23 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Qld Power Generators</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has granted <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119020/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">interim authorisation</a> for Queensland power generators ... to jointly renegotiate existing coal supply arrangements with Anglo Coal.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/electricity-generators-allowed-to-start-joint-negotiations" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119020/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:56:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bradken appeal to be heard in November</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The appeal from Justice Gordon's decision in <em><a href="cases/2013bradken.html">Norcast S.ár.L v Bradken Limited (No 2)</a></em><a href="cases/2013bradken.html"> [2013] FCA 235</a> will commence in Melbourne on 4 November 2013 and is estimated to run for up to 4 days. This follows Marshall ordered that the 'appeal be listed for hearing in the Full Court and Appellate Sittings of the Court in Melbourne commencing on 4 November 2013 before a Full Court, with an estimate of up to 4 days.' (orders of Justice Marshall on 12 July 2013).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:50:47 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC takes action against Koyo for alleged cartel</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has instituted civil proceedings against Koyo Australia Pty Ltd for alleged cartel conduct in relation to the supply of ball and other roller bearings. It alleges Koyo and at least two competitors made and gave effect to two separate cartel arrangements for an increase in the price of bearings. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-koyo-for-alleged-cartel-conduct" target="_blank">press release</a>. A directions hearing is set for 14 August in Sydney.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:50:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to investigate alleged casino deal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The Age </em>reports that the ACCC is investigating an alleged secret deal by James Packer to keep Crown out of Brisbane if Echo Entertainment agreed to let him into Sydney's market. View Mark Hawthorne and Ruth Williams<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/accc-probe-into-packer-for-casino-secret-deal-20130712-2pvor.html" target="_blank">, 'ACCC probe into Packer for casino 'secret deal'</a>' (The Age, 13 July 2013). See also David Stringer, '<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-07-13/australia-regulator-will-look-into-reported-comments-by-echo-ceo" target="_blank">Australian Regulator to Check Report on Echo Chairman Comment</a>' (BloombergBusinessWeek, 13 July 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:50:04 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition law predictions for 2013/2014 financial year</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr Martyn Taylor fron Norton Rose Fulbright has published his predictions for Australian competition regulation in the current financial year: see Martyn Taylor, '<a href="http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/au/knowledge/publications/100861/australian-competition-regulation-what-should-we-expect-for-the-201314-financial-year" target="_blank">Australian competition regulation: What should we expect for the 2013/14 financial year?</a>' (July 2013). He also summarises key developments and trends over the last financial year.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:49:34 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple guilty of conspiracy to restrain trade</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, it's not Australian competition law news, but I could not resist. District Judge Denise Cote (US District Court for the Southern District of New York) has (in a brief 160 page judgment) has ruled that Apple facilitated and directly participated in a horizontal conspiracy with named publishers to 'eliminate retail price competition in order to raise e-book prices'. Apple, Judge Cote held, 'played a central role in facilitating and executing that consipracy' and without 'Apple's orchestration of this conspiracy, it would not have succeeded as it did ...'. Apple, the Court held, knew the publishers wanted to increase the price of e-books and 'seized the moment and brilliantly played its hand' taking advantage of the publishers' 'fear of and frustration over Amazon's pricing'. </p>
<blockquote>
<p>'Through the vehicle of the Apple agency agreements, the prices in the nascent e-book industry shifted upward, in some cases 50% or more for an individual title. Virtually overnight, Apple got an attractive, additional feature for its iPad and a guaranteed new revenue stream, and the Publisher Defendants removed Amazon’s ability to price their e-books at $9.99.' </p></blockquote>
<p>There's even a heading in the judgement 'Conspiracy by Telepathy'. Judge Cote concluded that 'by by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple conspired to restrain trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act'. Well worth reading. <a href="http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&amp;id=306" target="_blank">View case</a>. See also Competition Policy International, '<a href="https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/us-verdict-is-in-for-apple-in-ebooks-case?utm_source=Apple+Decision&amp;utm_campaign=April+30,+2013&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank">US: Verdict is in for Apple in ebooks case</a>' with some brief commentary and links to other relevant content.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:02:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to conditionally reauthorise Virgin and Air NZ trans-Tasman alliance</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1106131/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> 'proposing to grant conditional authorisation for three years for Virgin   Australia and Air New Zealand Limited to continue their trans-Tasman   alliance.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-conditionally-reauthorise-virgin-and-air-new-zealand-trans-tasman-alliance" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1106131/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:01:45 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed acquisition of Hawker Supa IGA by Woolworths</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Hawker Supa IGA by Woolworths. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-the-proposed-acquisition-of-hawker-supa-iga-by-woolworths" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119961/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:30:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases draft Merger Review Process Guidelines</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/mergers-and-adjudication/merger-process-guidelines" target="_blank">draft Merger Review Process Guidelines</a>.  Public consultation will run from 1 July - 19 July. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-comment-on-updated-merger-process-guidelines" target="_blank">press release</a>. There is some useful firm commentary on this. See, for example, notices from <a href="http://www.allens.com.au/pubs/comp/focomp2jul13.htm" target="_blank">Allens&gt;&lt;Linklaters</a> and <a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/4_july_2013/20130704/accc_tries_to_make_its_informal_mergers_process_clearer.page" target="_blank">Clayton Utz</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:26:42 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition watchdog's investigation into major supermarkets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Executive General Manager, Marcus Bezzi, spoke to the Victorian Farmers Federation today about the ACCC's investigation into major supermarkets. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/competition-watchdog%E2%80%99s-investigation-into-major-supermarkets" target="_blank">View speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:04:51 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues updated authorisation guidelines</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has updated its <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1119108" target="_blank">authorisation guidelines</a>. Key changes include 'an explanation of the current practice of the ACCC in adopting a market failure framework for assessing public benefits and detriments',  'clarification of the ACCC’s approach to identifying the &quot;future with and without&quot;', 'recognition that the ACCC’s power to grant authorisation is discretionary' and 'clarification of the ACCC’s power to impose conditions when it grants authorisation.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-updated-authorisation-guidelines" target="_blank">press release</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:26:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose Archer Daniels Midland acquisition of Graincorp</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the ADM proposed acquisition of Graincorp. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-archer-daniels-midland-acquisition-of-graincorp" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1119061" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:25:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interim authorisation for concrete carrier allocation system</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>'The ACCC has <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+89146.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1119114&amp;trimFileName=D13+89146.pdf" target="_blank">granted interim authorisation</a> to Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd   to extend the operation of its cartage allocation system for concrete   carriers in Western Australia.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-approval-to-concrete-carrier-allocation-system" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1118332/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:23:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise joint tenders for waste collection and recycling</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+88538.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1119012&amp;trimFileName=D13+88538.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to authorise 'Wollongong City Council and Shellharbour City Council to jointly tender and contract for waste collection services and the processing of recyclable material.' Parties wishing to make submissions can do so until 12 July. View press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-joint-tenders-for-waste-collection-and-recycling-services" target="_blank">release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1105888/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:23:09 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does cartel immunity really work?</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Caron Beaton-Wells has an item in today's conversation discussing cartel immunity policies - '<a href="http://theconversation.com/does-immunity-for-cartel-whistleblowers-really-work-14805" target="_blank">Does immunity for cartel whistelblowers really work?</a>'. It focuses on the ACCC's current review of Australia's cartel immunity policy.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:22:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes refusing ophthalmologist authorisation</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1104670/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">draft decision</a> propositing not to allow members of the Australian Society of Ophthalmologists to reach fee agreements within shared practices. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-not-to-authorise-fee-arrangements-by-ophthalmologists" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
<h3>19 June 2013 - Road to competition reforms: the Australian experience</h3>
<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke to Latin American and Caribbean officials and regulators at a World Bank Group/INDECOI event today. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/the-road-to-competition-reforms-the-australian-experience" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/making-markets-work-for-increased-productivity-and-growth-the-australian-experience" target="_blank">speech: 'Making markets work for increased productivity and growth: the Australian Experience'</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:18:49 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Road to competition reforms: the Australian experience</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke to Latin American and Caribbean officials and regulators at a World Bank Group/INDECOI event today. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/the-road-to-competition-reforms-the-australian-experience" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/making-markets-work-for-increased-productivity-and-growth-the-australian-experience" target="_blank">speech: 'Making markets work for increased productivity and growth: the Australian Experience'</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:18:02 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another private member's bill attacks supermarkets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The other private member's bill introduced yesterday was the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5097" target="_blank">Supermarket Dominance Bill 2013</a>. This one was circulated by Bob Katter MP and supported by the collective wisdom of Nick Xenophon MP and Andrew Wilkie MP. This would make it an offence (subject to $50m penalty) to operate a supermarket business where that business (and related supermarket businesses) has a supermarket market share of: more than 40% for year 2 or more than 35% for year 3 etc to more than 20% for any later year. Essentially it requires reduction in market share of the major supermarkets to no larger than 20% progressively over a six year period. Other similar offences are included. It goes beyond supermarket retailing to 'household retail businesses' as well, aiming to 'ensure that the supermarket giants’ vast operations in “household retail businesses” are progressively&nbsp;reduced&nbsp;to 20% total market share throughout a 6 year period' (EM). The bill also involves setting up a Commissioner for Food Retailing. </p>
<p>This is one of the strangest bills I've read ... and there have been some shockers relating to competition policy in Australia. Margy Osmond of the ANRA has described the bill as 'ill-conceived and populist' (see Jacob Greber and Claire Stewart, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/independents_pressure_supermarkets_Mw7jdan06zDp1cu5AooiML" target="_blank">MP's pressure supermarkets</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 18 June 2013). Hard to argue with that asessment.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:11:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Private member's bill on market power</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5090" target="_blank">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Strengthening Rules About Misuse of Power) Bill 2013</a> was introduced into the House yesterday. It proposes insertion of a subsection (1AAAA)!!! This involves an effects based test for conduct engaged in by corporations with substantial market power. It also proposes further investigation powers for the ACCC where the ACCC 'reasonably believes that circumstances exist to indicate that there has been or might be a contravention of section 46'. It is a private members bill introduced by independent MP, Rob Oakeshott . The EM talks a lot about cheap milk. <a href="http://www.roboakeshott.com/node/1698" target="_blank">Rob Oakeshott's press release</a> emphasises the bill's aim to 'help farmers'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:05:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coalitions supports ACCC Woolworths decision</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The financial review reports that the Coalition is supporting the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-woolworths-proposed-acquisition-of-glenmore-ridge-site" target="_blank">decision of the ACCC</a> to block Woolworths' acquisition of a supermarket site at Glenmore Ridge. See Joanna Heath and Matthew Drummond, 'Coalition <a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/coalition_supports_accc_veto_of_OBD0Bk4tlvs38tlcu8ULQO" target="_blank">supports ACCC veto of Woolworths store</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 11 June 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:31:31 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media on ACCC merger decisions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of media on yesterday's ACCC's merger decisions and, according to Sue Mitchell at the AFR, Woolworths is considering challenging the ACCC's decision. See, for example:</p>
<ul>
<li>Sue Mitchell, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/woolworths_to_take_on_accc_over_mM00WuUiJxTzaLtvFZQ14O" target="_blank">Woolworths to take on ACCC over sites</a>' (AFR, 7 June 2013)</li>
<li>John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/consumers-see-aldi-as-an-alternative-but-the-accc-seems-not-to/story-e6frg9io-1226658537824" target="_blank">Consumers see Aldi as an alternative but the ACCC seems not to</a>' (The Australian, 6 June 2013)</li>
<li>John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/ailing-industries-need-innovation-not-government-aid/story-e6frg9io-1226658969401" target="_blank">Ailing industries need innovation, not government aid</a>' (The Australian, 7 June 2013) (stating, in part, that the 'decision itself should be challenged because it rests in the argument that consumers won't travel 10 minutes down the road to look for alternative supermarkets') </li>
<li>'<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/6/7/retail/woolworths-mulls-accc-appeal" target="_blank">Woolworths mulls ACCC appeal'</a> (Business Spectator, 7 June 2013)</li>
<li>Greg Roberts, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/breaking-news/accc-blocks-new-woolies-store/story-e6frg90f-1226658605156" target="_blank">ACCC blocks new Woolies store</a>' (The Australian, 6 June 2013) and plenty more.</li></ul>
<p>See also&nbsp;<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-proposed-acquisition-of-raffertys-garden" target="_blank">Heinz/Rafferty's Garden press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-woolworths-proposed-acquisition-of-glenmore-ridge-site" target="_blank">Woolworths/Glenmore Ridge press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:17:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes Heinz and Woolworths' acquisitions</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will oppose the proposed acquisition of Rafferty's Garden by Heinz and the proposed acquisition by Woolworths of a supermarket site at Glenmore Ridge. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-proposed-acquisition-of-raffertys-garden" target="_blank">Heinz/Rafferty's Garden press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-oppose-woolworths-proposed-acquisition-of-glenmore-ridge-site" target="_blank">Woolworths/Glenmore Ridge press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:58:38 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC set to rule on key mergers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is scheduled to announce a final decision in relation to two key merger proposals tomorrow. The first is the <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1087157/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">proposed Heinz takeover of Rafferty's Garden</a>. The ACCC commenced its review on this one on 29 October 2012 and released a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+1190.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1115472&amp;trimFileName=MER13+1190.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on 7 February this year. The other releates to <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1060730/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Woolworth's proposed acquisition of a supermarket site at Glenmore Ridge</a>. This review commenced on 20 June 2012 and a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER12+10910.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1115041&amp;trimFileName=MER12+10910.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> was released on 20 September. See also John Durie, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/competiton-watchdog-set-to-rule-on-supermarket-giants/story-e6frg9io-1226657320693" target="_blank">Competition Watchdog set to rule on retail giants</a> (The Australian, 5 June 2013).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:30:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases new Service Charter</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has launched a new service charter focussing on the ACCC's 'effort to communicate technical work in plain English'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-new-service-charter" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/service-charter" target="_blank">charter</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:29:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC finalises wholesale prices for broadband services on Telstra's copper network</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it has today published its Final Access Determination (FAD) setting out the price and non-price terms for wholesale ADLS services. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-finalises-wholesale-prices-for-broadband-services-on-telstra%E2%80%99s-copper-network" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1032830" target="_blank">FAD</a>. Plenty of media on this. See, for example, James Hutchinson, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/technology/accc_reduces_wholesale_broadband_NmHcuH59wThAyLjpJbCM6J" target="_blank">ACCC reduces wholesale broadband prices</a>' (AFR, 30 May 2013) and Jordan Chong, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/breaking-news/accc-lowers-wholesale-broadband-prices/story-e6frg90f-1226653922669" target="_blank">ACCC lowers wholesale broadband prices</a>' (The Australian, 31 May 2013)</p>
<h3>30 May 2013 - ACCC does not oppose Ruralco's proposed acquisition of Elders Rural Services</h3>
<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Ruralco's proposed acquisition fo Elders Rural Services Limited. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-ruralcos-proposed-acquisition-of-elders-rural-services" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1115891/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 16:20:26 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose Ruralco's proposed acquisition of Elders Rural Services</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Ruralco's proposed acquisition fo Elders Rural Services Limited. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-ruralcos-proposed-acquisition-of-elders-rural-services" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1115891/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 16:20:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows RACQ Approved Repairers to offer reciprocal warranty repairs</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[>The ACCC has <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1104273/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">granted authorisation</a> to 'the RACQ and its Approved Repairers to allow them to set the labour rate   for warranty repairs undertaken by another Approved Repairer.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/racq-and-its-approved-repairers-to-offer-a-warranty-repair-service-0" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1104273/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:19:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by Qld newsagents</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'proposes to authorise the Queensland Newsagents Federation and its   members to collectively bargain with Tatts Group and its subsidiary   Golden Casket for five years in relation to lottery products.' Interested parties wishing to comment on teh <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1101220/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> must do so by 21 June 2013. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-collective-bargaining-by-queensland-newsagents" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1101220/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:19:21 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Productivity Commission released Draft Report on National Access Regime</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/access-regime/draft" target="_blank">Productivity Commission has released it's draft report</a> on the National Access Regime. Submissions on this report are due by Friday 5 July 2013. The final report is expected in October.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 08:50:58 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition Out Now</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This month's <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">State of Competition</a> (<a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_12_public_benefit_.pdf" target="_blank">Issue 12 (May 2013)</a>) by Rachel Trindade, Rhonda L Smith and Alexandra Merrett asks &quot;<a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_12_public_benefit_.pdf" target="_blank">The Australian difference: has the public benefit test been eroded?</a>'&quot; As always, well worth reading, particularly in light of the <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/communications/authorisation-guidelines" target="_blank">ACCC's review of its authorisation guidelines</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 08:50:36 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reviews its immunity policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, at the Competition Law Conference (4 May), the ACCC announced it would conduct a review into its immunity policy. <a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201305/28/australia_reviews_its_immunity_policy_for_cartel_conduct.page" target="_blank">Clayton Utz</a> has produced a neat little note about this. Unlike the authorisation review, no information about the review seems to have been provided on the ACCC's website.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 08:50:19 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC commences inquiry into access to mobile networks</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'commenced a public inquiry to decide whether to extend, vary or revoke   the domestic mobile terminating access service (MTAS) declaration, or   whether to make a new declaration.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-commences-inquiry-into-access-to-mobile-networks" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1115105" target="_blank">inquiry home page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 08:50:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow joint tender for recycling services to councils</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1100583/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to authorise a number of inner-Sydney councils to jointly tender and contract for trhe processing of dry recyclable material. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-allow-joint-tender-for-recycling-services-to-inner-sydney-councils" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1100583/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:49:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC merger review update</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the past week the ACCC has commenced a number of new informal merger reviews, including:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1112772/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Woolworths' proposed acquisition of Supa IGA</a> at Riverside Gardens, Bansia Beach and Rusmussen (commenced 14 May; submissions from interested parties due 4 June; proposed final decision: 4 July)</li>
<li><a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1112974/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Peregrine Corporation's proposed acquisition of 25 BP Australia's petrol retail sites in South Australia</a> (commenced 15 May; submissions from interested parties due 20 June; proposed announcement of ACCC decision: 26 September) and </li>
<li><a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1113401/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Perpetual Limited's proposed acquisition of The Trust Company Ltd</a>, for which a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+4337.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1113726&amp;trimFileName=MER13+4337.pdf" target="_blank">market inquiries letter</a> has now been published (commenced 16 May; submissions due 7 June; proposed date for announcement of ACCC decision: 11 July).</li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:24:24 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mergers: A 20 year retrospective</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The presentation made by ACCC Commissioner, Jill Walker and ACCC Executive General Manager (Legal Group), Tim Grimwade, at the recent Competition Law Conference is now available to view online (PDF) - well worth a look. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/mergers-a-20-year-retrospective" target="_blank">View presentation</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:30:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases quarterly report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1112398" target="_blank">March 2013 quarterly report</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-march-2013-quarterly-report" target="_blank">press release</a>. In relation to competition enforcement it notes: </p>
<ul>
<li>eight carry over cases and one new case alleging misuse of market power (the Visa proceedings, initiated in Sydney on 4 Feb, alleging Visa 'misused its market power for the purposes of preventing the expansion of DCC to new merchant outlets in Australia and preventing businesses in Australia from supplying DCC services on ATMs in competition with Visa’s own currency conversion service'. </li>
<li>there are eight ongoing cases, seven of which involve cartel or price fixing conduct and one involving misuse of market pwoer (Cement Australia; commenced 12 September 2008). </li>
<li>one s 87B undertaking for alleged anti-competitive behavior by All Homes Pty Ltd. </li>
<li>65 mergers considered this quarter (51 pre-assessed as not requiring review; of the remaining matters 12 were cleared unconditionally, one was cleared on a confidential basis and in the remaining case the ACCC 'formed the view that it could nto make a decision without conducting public inquiries'). The document summarises the more significant merger reviews. </li>
<li>Eight draft authorisation decisions, 12 final authorisation determinations and&nbsp;six interim decisions were made this quarter, the most significant being the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">Qantas/Emirates authorisation</a>. </li>
<li>Ninety-six exclusive dealing notifications were received and 78 were allowed to stand (the report sets out the more significant notifications). There was only one collective bargaining notification lodged during htis period - that was by the <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1107132/fromItemId/773840" target="_blank">Manning Valley dairy farmers</a> (these were lodged on 25 March so a decision was not made in the quarter; however, on 18 April the notifications were allowed to stand). </li>
<li>Continuing investigations include price information sharing between fuel companies, shopper docket schemes, supermarket conduct (including allegations of MMP) and online cmpetition issues. </li>
<li>The revised <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/australian-competition-consumer-commission/compliance-enforcement-policy" target="_blank">Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> was also released in February.</li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 10:21:24 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACT dumps controversial supermarket competition policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACT government has dumped the supermarket competition policy it released in 2010 following a review of the existing policy by former ACCC commissioner John Martin. See, for example, Lisa Moley, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-07/act-dumps-supermarket-competition-policy/4674362?section=act" target="_blank">ACT slashes supermarket competition policy</a>' (ABC News, 7 May 2013)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:54:47 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft authorisation guidelines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued <a href="https://consultation.accc.gov.au/communications/authorisation-guidelines" target="_blank">Draft Authorisation Guidelines 2013</a> for comment. Submissions are due by Friday 31 May 2013. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-seeks-comment-on-revised-authorisation-guidelines" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:01:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Law Conference</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The Hodgekiss' put on another terrific Competition Law Conference in Sydney today, featuring, amongst others, The Honourable Dyson Heydon AC (Is the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) in competition with itself?), Dr Jill Walker and Tim Grimwade from the ACCC (Mergers - A 20 Year Retrospective), Luke Woodward (Current Issues in Merger Reviews), Professor Stephen Corones and Carolyn Oddie (The Pitfalls of Public Announcements) and Professor Caron Beaton-Wells and Marcus Bezzi (The ACCC Immunity Policy for Cartel Conduct: Due for Review?). Look out for the 25th Anniversary of the conference in May 2014.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 20:53:14 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow RACQ and approved retailers to set labour rate for warranty repairs</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1104273/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to allow the 'RACQ and its Approved Repairers to set the labour rate for warranty repairs undertaken by another Approved Repairer.
  
  “Under the proposed repair warranty scheme, any defects in an original repair can be fixed by any RACQ Approved Repairer at no cost to the member.”'.  The ACCC considers taht any detriment associated with the agreement would be 'limited by the competitive nature of the automotive repair industry in Queensland'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/racq-and-its-approved-repairers-to-offer-a-warranty-repair-service" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1104273/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 11:53:11 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC's Airport report card</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released its annual report on the major airports (<a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1110935" target="_blank">Airport Monitoring Report 2011-2012</a>), finding that airports remain profitable but service has dropped. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/growth-in-passenger-numbers-continuing-to-drive-airport-profits-and-need-for-new" target="_blank">ACCC Press release</a>. See, eg, Steve Creedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/airports-in-profit-but-service-suffers-accc-report-finds/story-e6frg95x-1226632025008" target="_blank">Airports in profit, but service suffers, ACCC report finds</a>' (30 April 2013) </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:48:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC monitoring Archer Daniels possible takeover of Graincorp</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is now monitoring Archer Daniels Midland Company's possible takeover of GrainCorp Limited. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1110838/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. Plenty of interest in this. See, for example:</p>
<ul>
<li>ABC News, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-29/vff-keen-on-accc-view-of-graincorp-takeover/4656760" target="_blank">VFF keen for ACCC view of GrainCorp takeover</a>' (29 April 2013)</li>
<li>Sue Neales and Andrew White, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-to-probe-34bn-foreign-graincorp-sale/story-fn91v9q3-1226630331754" target="_blank">'ACCC to probe $3.4bn foreign GrainCorp sale</a>' (The Australian, 27 April 27)</li>
<li>'<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/4/29/agribusiness/adms-graincorp-bid-under-fire" target="_blank">ADM's GrainCorp bid under fire</a>' (Business Spectator, 29 April 2013) </li>
<li>Blair Speedy and Sue Neales, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/analysts-raise-funding-doubts-on-adms-graincorp-bid/story-fn91v9q3-1226631155664" target="_blank">Analysts await details of financing for ADM's GrainCorp bid</a>' (The Australian, 29 April 2013).</li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:47:21 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICN 12th annual meeting</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/" target="_blank">International Competition Network</a> (ICN) held its <a href="http://icnwarsaw2013.org/" target="_blank">12th annual meeting</a> on 24-26 April 2013, in Warsaw, Poland. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/international-competition-network-advances-competition-law-enforcement-cooperation" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. View <a href="http://icnwarsaw2013.org/programme/programme/programme-and-documents/" target="_blank">program and documents</a> (including <a href="http://icnwarsaw2013.org/docs/icn_statement_of_achievements_april_2013.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Achievements 2001-2013</a> and, of particular interest, the <a href="http://icnwarsaw2013.org/docs/icn_oecd_icn_report.pdf" target="_blank">Report on the OECD/ICN Survey on International Enforcement Co-operation</a> (all 251 pages)).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:46:31 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abbott's proposed competition review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The AFR had an item on Abbott's planned competition law review yesterday: Fleur Anderson, '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/national/abbott_plans_look_at_competition_ZS4WbHBZ4e9Vd8S5jn1uJP" target="_blank">Abbott plans laws inquiry</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 23 April 2013, page 8). The article claims the Coalition is planning a 'Henry reviewstyle inquiry into competition laws, including an investigation into the market dominance of supermarket chains, within the first 100 days of an Abbott government'. It claims the inquiry will be the first since <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/1993hilmer.html">Hilmer</a> in 1993 (apparently they overlooked the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2003dawson.html">Dawson Inquiry</a>). The article notes opposition small business spokesman, Bruce Billson, is drafting the terms of reference for the review.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:41:26 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speeks to World Bank Forum on Australian competition policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has delivered a speech to a World Bank Forum in Poland entitled '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/australia%E2%80%99s-experience-driving-economic-growth-through-competition-policy-reforms" target="_blank">Making markets work for development: A reform agenda on competition</a>'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/competition-reforms-and-driving-economic-development" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:45:43 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal releases reasons for decision re: CBH notification</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal has now published its reasons for decision in <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2013/2013acompt0003" target="_blank"> Application by Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited (No 3) [2013] ACompT 3,</a> redacted in respect of commercially confidentail information (it still runs to 88 pages, so make sure you brew a decent cup of coffee before settling down for a read).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:50:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose Virgin/Tiger deal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Virgin Australia’s proposed acquisition of 60% of Tiger Australia. ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated that the ACCC's view was that 'this acquisition is unlikely to lead to a substantial lessening of competition in the Australian market for domestic air passenger transport services'. This was based largely on their assessment that 'Tiger Australia would be highly unlikely to remain in the local market if the proposed acquisition didn’t proceed'. The ACCC's review commenced on 2 November 2012; the timeline for review was suspended twice. </p>
<ul>
<li>View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-virgin-australia%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-60-of-tiger-australia" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. </li>
<li>View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1110182" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </li></ul>
<p>See also plenty of commentary on this - for example:</p>
<ul>
<li>Matt O'Sullivan, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/green-light-for-virgintiger-deal-20130423-2ibge.html" target="_blank">Green light for Virgin-Tiger deal</a>' and '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/virgintiger-deal-shortterm-pain-longterm-gain-20130423-2iby5.html#ixzz2RKbLfTkQ" target="_blank">Virgin-Tiger deal: short-term pain, long-term gain</a>' (The Age, 23 April 2013)</li>
<li>Samantha Donovan, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-23/accc-clears-virgin-tiger-merger/4647198?section=business" target="_blank">ACCC Clears Virgin-Tiger merger</a>' (ABC news (transcript of interview with Rod Sims), 23 April 2013) </li>
<li>Matthew Smith, '<a href="http://www.brw.com.au/p/business/back_to_duopoly_accc_removes_chocks_SSkavRzt6PT2p2CU2wLl3H" target="_blank">Back to a duopoly: ACCC removes chocks on Virgin-Tiger deal</a>' (BRW, 23 April 2013)</li>
<li>Steve Creedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/jobs-and-aircraft-saved-as-watchdog-approves-virgin-australia-tiger-deal/story-e6frg95x-1226627392693" target="_blank">Jobs and aircraft saved as watchdog approves Virgin Australia-Tiger deal</a>' (The Australian, 24 April 2013).</li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:28:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alexandra Merrett on Coles' New Milk Deal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Alexadnra Merrett has an opinion piece in <a href="http://theconversation.com/coles-milk-deal-gives-supermarket-suppliers-a-reason-to-be-sour-13600" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>: 'Coles' milk deal gives supermarket suppliers a reason to be sour'. Well worth a read, as always.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:36:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal affirms ACCC's CBH notification ruling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal has affirmed the ACCC's decision to revoke Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited's (CBH's) exclusive dealing notification, 'which allowed CBH to require Western Australian grain growers and marketers who use its 'up-country' storage facilities to also use its transport services to deliver grain to port for export.'</p>
<ul>
<li>View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/competition-tribunal-affirms-accc-decision-to-open-wa-grain-supply-chain-to" target="_blank">press release</a>. </li>
<li>View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/832245/fromItemId/809131" target="_blank">ACCC notification register</a>. </li>
<li>View <a href="http://www.competitiontribunal.gov.au/decisions3/notice-for-2013-acompt-3" target="_blank">Tribunal ruling (Application by Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited (No 3) [2013] ACompT 3 )</a> (note, reasons for ruling to be published on 24 April). </li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:04:25 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manning Valley Dairy farmers may collectively bargain with Woolworths</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has approved an application by Manning Valley Dairy Farmers to collectively bargain with Woolworths and Milk2Market for a period of three years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/manning-valley-dairy-farmers-to-collectively-bargain-with-woolworths" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1107132/fromItemId/815577" target="_blank">public register</a>. See also, Kim Honan, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-18/woolworths-dairy-farmers-given-tick/4636922" target="_blank">Woolworths dairy farmers given tick</a>' (18 April 2013, ABC Rural)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:45:36 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speaks on Access Regulation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, addressed a Gilbert + Tobin Lawyers competition policy workshop in Sydney today to outline the Australian approach to infrastructure access regulation, which he described as working well. However, he argued the test for coverage 'should be based on the economics of natural monopoly', rather than the private profitability test recently applied by the High Court. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australian-approach-to-access-regulation-promotes-efficiency-and-productivity" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/competition-policy-workshop-–-infrastructure-access" target="_blank">speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:45:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises RWWA and Sportingbet agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'granted   authorisation to Racing and Wagering Western Australia (RWWA) for an   agreement to acquire fixed odds management services from Sportingbet   Australia Pty Ltd'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-agreement-between-rwwa-and-sportingbet" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:39:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises agreement between Tabcorp and ACTTAB</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'granted authorisation to Tabcorp Wagering Manager (Vic) Pty Ltd (Tabcorp) for its agreement with ACTTAB Limited (ACTTAB) to provide fixed odds wagering management services'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-agreement-between-tabcorp-and-acttab" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:38:49 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clock back on Virgin-Tiger deal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has re-started the clock on their review of the Virgin-Tiger deal after receiving more informatoin from the parties (the timeline was suspended on 8 March).  A decision is now expected on 24 April. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1087532/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/virgin-line-on-tiger-requires-leap-of-faith/story-e6frg9io-1226619043430" target="_blank">Virgin line on Tiger requires leap of faith</a>' (The Australian, 12 April 2013) and Ben Sandilands, 
  '<a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2013/04/16/accc-resets-the-clock-on-virgin-tiger-deal/" target="_blank">ACCC resets the clock on Virgin-Tiger deal</a>' (Crikey, 16 April 2013)</p>
<h3>11 April 2013 - ACCC clears Agrium Inc's proposed acquisition of Viterra's agri-products retail business</h3>
<p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:36:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC clears Agrium Inc's proposed acquisition of Viterra's agri-products retail business</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will not oppose Agrium Inc's proposed acquisition of 'Viterra Inc's farm supply agri-products   retail business, fertiliser importation and wholesaling business, and   wool broking and exporting businesses'. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1108765/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:34:03 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC clears Reece's proposed acuisition of Ken Aaron consolidated plumbing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has not opposed the proposed acquisition of Ken Aaron consolidated plumbing group. <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1108767/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">View merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:34:48 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC clears dnata's proposed acquisition of aircraft cabin cleaning business</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has not opposed the acquisition by dnata (which forms part of the Emirates Group) of 'the   aircraft cabin cleaning business of Broadlex Air Services Pty Ltd'. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1108938/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:36:58 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition Out Now</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>TGIF - a new TSOC to warm out inboxes. This time Rachel Trindade and Alexandra Merrett discuss 'A road map to statutory immunity in Australia', looking at Australia's authorisation and notification processes. Read it now at <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/newsletter/issue-11-a-road-map-to-statutory-immunity-in-australia/" target="_blank">The State of Competition</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:56:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues draft NBN decision</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a draft decision on NBN Co's revised Special Access Undertaking. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-issues-draft-decision-on-nbn-co-special-access-undertaking" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. Plenty of media on this. See, for example: </p>
<ul>
<li>Supratim Adhihari, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/4/5/technology/accc%E2%80%99s-nbn-access-noose" target="_blank">ACCC's NBN access noose</a>' (Business Spectator - Technology Spectator, 5 April) </li>
<li>Peter Cai, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/accc-seeks-more-control-on-nbn-prices-20130404-2h9ra.html" target="_blank">ACCC seeks more control on NBN prices</a>' (The Age, 5 April 2013)</li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:56:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to councils</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to Wollongong City Council and Shellharbour City Council 'to enable them to request and evaluate tenders for the collection of waste and the processing of recyclables'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-councils" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:55:30 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Virgin and Tiger - the wait continues</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Adele Fergusen has an item in The Age today about the ongoing delay in assessing the Virgin/Tiger merger: see Adele Ferguson, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/virgin-has-tiger-by-the-tail-as-accc-dawdles-20130328-2gxds.html" target="_blank">Virgin has Tiger by the tail as ACCC dawdles</a>' (The Age, 29 March 2013).  View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1087532/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:25:15 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves proposed acquisition of Australian Local Search Pty Ltd (trading as TrueLocal) by Sensis Pty Ltd</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has indicated it will not oppose the proposed acquisition by Sensis of TrueLocal. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1107332/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/digital/accc-approves-sensis-acquisition-of-truelocal/story-fna03wxu-1226608430723" target="_blank">ACCC approves Sensis acquisition of TrueLocal</a>' (The Australian, 28 March 2013) </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:24:41 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants conditional authorisation for Qantas/Emirates alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D13+39284.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1107248&amp;trimFileName=D13+39284.pdf" target="_blank">granted authorisation</a> for the proposed Qantas/Emirates alliance until 31 March 2018. The authorisation is conditional on the airlines maintaiing 'at least their pre-alliance aggregate capacity on the four overlapping trans-Tasman routes, subject to a review to consider whether increases in the minimum required capacity are warranted'. </p>
<ul>
<li>View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-conditional-authorisation-for-an-alliance-between-qantas-and-emirates" target="_blank">press release</a>. </li>
<li>View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a> (on transition site). </li>
<li>View <a href="http://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media-releases/qantas-and-emirates-welcome-accc-decision-on-partnership" target="_blank">Qantas/Emirates press release</a>. </li>
<li>See also '<a href="https://theconversation.com/accc-approves-qantas-emirates-deal-the-experts-respond-13117" target="_blank">ACCC approves Qantas-Emirates deal: the experts respond</a>' (The Conversation, 27 March 2013) (authored by Sunanda Creagh and involving interviews with David Beirman, Tony Webber and Hamza Bendemra).</li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:27:01 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speeks to National Press Club</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke to the National Press Club today, outlining the ACCC's 'role in making the market economy work as it should for all Australians'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/active-regulator-keeping-the-faith-in-our-market-economy" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/economic-philosophy-and-the-accc-and-we-are-all-economic-philosophers" target="_blank">speech: 'Economic philosophy and the ACCC (and we are all economic philosophers)'</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:26:33 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows dentitst in shared practices to agree on fees</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has granted authorisation to allow dentists who share practices to agree on fees, provided on party is a member of the Australian Dental Association. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-allows-dentists-in-shared-practices-to-agree-on-fees" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:54:45 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises coordination between Jetstar branded joint ventures</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authorisation to Qantas and Jetstar 'for coordination involving four Asian based Jetstar branded joint   ventures: Jetstar Asia, Jetstar Pacific, Jetstar Japan and Jetstar Hong   Kong until 31 March 2018'. The ACCC considers the coordination is likely to benefit consumers and produce little, if any, detriment, given existing level of competition. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-coordination-between-jetstar-joint-ventures" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1063283/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a> (on transition site).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:59:55 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBA 9th Competition Mid-Year Conference</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC is hosting the IBA's 9th Competition Mid-Year Conference in Sydney. ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, opened the event yesterday, again noting that the 'ACCC has in the order of 30 in-depth competition investigations, under way covering many fascinating issues&quot;, including around 10 relating to cartels and 10 to misuse of market power. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/australia-plays-host-to-key-competition-law-conference" target="_blank">press release</a>. Read <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/speech/opening-address-iba-competition-conference" target="_blank">Sims' opening address</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:39:53 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not oppose CBA's proposed acquisition of Aussie Home Loans</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the CBA's 'proposed acquisition of the remaining 67% of the issued capital in AHL Holdings Pty Limited (Aussie Home Loans)'. ACCC commenced review on 11 January and lists review days as 40 (excluding weekends, public holidays and suspension while further information sought from 8-19 February). Actual days from commencement was 70. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-to-not-oppose-cba%E2%80%99s-proposed-acquisition-of-aussie-home-loans" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1106573" target="_blank">merger register</a> (transition site). See also Clancy Yeates, '<a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/accc-signs-off-on-cba-stake-in-aussie-20130321-2ggyk.html" target="_blank">ACCC signs off on CBA stake in Aussie</a>' (Brisbane Times, 21 March 2013)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:51:08 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining with Tatts</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'issued a final decision allowing the Australian Newsagents&rsquo; Federation   (ANF) and its members to collectively bargain with Tatts Lotteries SA   for a period of five years.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-collective-bargaining-by-the-anf-with-tatts-in-sa" target="_blank">press release</a>. View authorisation <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093189/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">register</a> (transition site).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:39:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media Mergers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The issue of media mergers is back in the news as the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=ec_ctte/media_reform_bills/index.htm" target="_blank">Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications</a> review the government's Media Reform Bills Package, introduced into the House on 14 March. The first public hearing was held in Canberra yesterday and continues today. Kicking off proceedings at 12:40pm will be the <a href="judges/finkelstein-ray.html" target="_blank">Hon Ray Finkelstein QC</a>, former President of the <a href="glossary/act.html">Competition Tribunal</a> and chair of the <a href="http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/independent_media_inquiry" target="_blank">Independent Media Inquiry</a> (2011-2012). Other witnesses include the CEO of the ACCC, Mr Brian Cassidy and Ms Rose Webb, Executive General Manager, ACCC Mergers and Adjudication Group.  Of most interest for competition law purposes is the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr4991%22" target="_blank">Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (News Media Diverstiy) Bill 2013</a> which, if passed, will add a public interest test (focussing on substantial lessening of diversity) - for media mergers, to be determined by a Public Interest Media Advocate (PIMA). This will apply over and above the s 50 SLC test.</p>
<p>For media see AAP, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/3/19/politics/accc-should-judge-merits-media-mergers-nine" target="_blank">ACCC should judge merits of media mergers: Nine</a>' (Business Spectator, 19 March 2013) and Ben Packham and David Crowe, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/broadcast/regional-networks-divided-over-proposed-changes-to-tv-reach-rules/story-fna045gd-1226599656508" target="_blank">Regional networks divided over proposed changes to TV reach rules</a>' (The Australian, 18 March 2013). See also Matthew Drummond and John McDuling, '' '<a href="http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/sims_opens_door_to_more_media_mergers_QK1rBX55S2227NLNzTphGL" target="_blank">Sims open door to more media mergers</a>' (Australian Financial Review, 6 March 2013). Submissions on these bills are due by 26 April 2013 with a reporting date of 17 June. To date, submissions have been received from 'Save Our SBS Inc', Seven West Media, Network Ten and Dr Margaret Simons (Director, Centre for Advancing Journalism, University of Melbourne).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:24:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Son of Hilmer' Competition Review in coalition sights</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Shadow Minister for Small Business, Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs, Bruce Billson has been speaking - again - of a full 'son of Hilmer' review of competition laws if the coalition takes government. Once again misuse of market power provisions have been signled out for attention, with Billson seeing value in an 'effects' test. See, for example, John Rolfe, '<a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/money/coalitions-bruce-billson-wants-to-rewrite-accc-misuse-of-market-power-laws/story-e6frezc0-1226599639364" target="_blank">Coalition's Bruce Billson wants to rewrite CCC misuse of market power laws</a>' (The Daily Telegraph, 18 March 2013). See also my <a href="https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/fortune-telling-australian-competition-law-in-201/" target="_blank">2013 fortune telling note in the <em>CPI Antitrust Chronicle</em></a> (expressing concerns about politicisation  of competition policy in the lead up to the federal election).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 03:38:05 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Link issues</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One consequence of the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/" target="_blank">ACCC's new website</a> is that (for reasons unknown - possibly just to annoy me) most URL's have now changed. As a result, all links on this site to past ACCC press releases are now dead. The ACCC site is currently in a transition mode, so links to merger registers, guidelines etc still seem ok (they lead to old style pages), but are likely to die as these pages transition to the new format (I don't know why they released the new site before this was complete). I will endeavour to update key links as the transition progresses, but there will no doubt be some glitches with links during this process so please bear with me ... all new media and register links should be fine.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Collective bargaining for central Qld coal producers authorised</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has granted authorisation for central Qld coal producers to 'collectively bargain with Adani Mining for access to its new coal   terminal at Dudgeon Point, and with Aurizon Network (previously QR   Network) for access to below rail infrastructure to transport their coal   to the terminal.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-authorises-collective-bargaining-for-central-queensland-coal-producers" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093431/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">public register</a> (on the transition site)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:31:22 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Queensland Newsagents Federation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has granted interim   authorisation to the Queensland Newsagents Federation (QNF) to allow it   and its members to collectively bargain with Golden Casket.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-to-queensland-newsagents-federation" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093189/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants authorisation to freelance playwrights for ten years</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has authorised the   Australian Writers&rsquo; Guild (AWG) to collectively negotiate the terms of   engagement of freelance playwrights with the Major Performing Arts Board   Theatres and any other major theatre company that may wish to   participate for ten years.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-authorisation-to-freelance-playwrights-for-ten-years" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1087148/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and NZCC sign cooperation agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC and NZCC signed a cooperation agreement today to 'share compulsorily acquired information and   provide investigative assistance'. Sims claims that, with this agreement, 'we now have what is probably the most complete set   of cooperation arrangements in place globally - outside countries who   have established cross border enforcers, such as the EU'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/closer-ties-across-the-tasman-as-accc-and-nzcc-sign-cooperation-agreement" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/speech/closer-ties-across-the-tasman" target="_blank">Sims' speech</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Cooperation%20agreement%20between%20the%20New%20Zealand%20Commerce%20Commission%20and%20the%20Australian%20Competition%20and%20Consumer%20Commission.pdf" target="_blank">agreement</a> (unfortunately just a pretty bad quality scan). Other agreements can be viewed on the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/international-relations/treaties-agreements" target="_blank">ACCC's Treaties and Agreements page</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation for inner Sydney councils</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'granted interim authorisation to a number of inner Sydney   councils' to enable them to 'request and evaluate new tenders for the   processing of dry recycling material within the Sydney metropolitan   area'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-grants-interim-authorisation-for-inner-sydney-councils" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1100583/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a> (still on transition site, so apologies if the link dies)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:43:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases quarterly report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The December 2012 quarterly report has now been published. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-december-2012-quarterly-report" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://transition.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1104072" target="_blank">report</a> (still part of the transition website)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC website gets an overhaul</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week the ACCC launched its new <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/" target="_blank">web site</a>. It looks better. Usability yet to be tested. They've also beefed up their social media presence - they've added <a href="https://twitter.com/acccgovau" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/ACCCConsumerRights" target="_blank">Facebook</a> feeds as well as adding to their <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/ACCCvideos" target="_blank">YouTube channel</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases new Compliance and Enforcement Policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>The ACCC's new <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/867964" target="_blank">Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> was released today, outlining 'the ACCC's   priority areas for the year and sets out the factors to be taken into   account when deciding whether to pursue matters.' The document itself runs to 5 pages (including a cover page). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1103126/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1103117" target="_blank">Sims' speech, launching the new policy, at a CEDA</a> function in Sydney. There is nothing much new on the competition law front, other than Sims' repeated promise that we can expect 'an increase its rate of intervention in competition matters' by the ACCC. Reference to prioritising concentrated sectors, particularly supermarkets and fuel also came as no surprise. </p>
<p>In his speech Sims spoke a bit about mergers (there is not a single reference to mergers in the Policy document itself). He noted that 'ACCC has responded to calls by   the trade practices and business community for increased transparency   and engagement with the ACCC during the course of merger reviews', but also noted that the 'increased level of transparency and engagement must, however, slow the process down' (it has been widely observed tha the process has slowed since the Metcash decision; see, for example, <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TSoC-Issue-6-Merger-Processes.pdf" target="_blank">'Howzat! The War on Mergers' from the crew at State of Competition</a>) In his speech he went on to say that the ACCC is revising its Informal Merger Process Guidelines and will be consulting with stakeholders on a revised draft in the coming months.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:52:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows GPs to set practice prices</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[http://australia<p>The ACCC has granted authorisation 'to allow individual General Practitioners (GPs) working in shared practices to set prices and collectively bargain'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1103191/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078772" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>ncompetitionlaw.org/news.html]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC goes after cartels</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Age reports that the ACCC will announce today that up to '30 in-depth investigations into cartel conduct and anti-competitive behaviour are under way'. In a speech to the Centre for Economic Development in Australia (CEDA), ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, will speak about the ACCC's focus on 'competition and consumer   issues arising in highly concentrated sectors, and in particular the   supermarkets and fuel sectors': see Lucy Battersby, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/watchdog-gets-tough-on-retail-20130220-2erlw.html" target="_blank">Watchdog gets tough on retail</a>' (The Age, 21 February 2013). The focus of supermarkets and fuel is nothing new - the ACCC has been talking about it for some time - but it will be worth having a look at the speech to see if any further detail is released. The speech will be delivered in Sydney at noon with the topic - 'Australia's competition landscape - making markets work' - view <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/events/eventdetails/2013/02/n130221?EventCode=N130221" target="_blank">CEDA event page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alexandra Merrett on the ACCC's shopper docket investigations</title>
      <link>http://theconversation.edu.au/accc-grocery-inquiry-will-take-a-long-time-to-bear-fruit-12244</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Alex Merrett has an<a href="http://theconversation.edu.au/accc-grocery-inquiry-will-take-a-long-time-to-bear-fruit-12244" target="_blank"> item in The Conversation today</a>, wonderfully entitled: '<a href="http://theconversation.edu.au/accc-grocery-inquiry-will-take-a-long-time-to-bear-fruit-12244" target="_blank">ACCC grocery inquiry will take a long time to bear fruit</a>'. In it, she discusses shopper dockets and other misuse of market power claims against the supermarket being investigated by the ACCC. It's always worth reading Alex's pieces - this one's no exception - just go and do it.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The State of Competition returns for 2013</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Alexandra Merrett, Rhonda Smith and Rachel Trindade have just released the first '<a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_10_Consumers_final_.pdf" target="_blank">State of Competition</a>' for 2013 and fear of the possible political uses to which competition law might be put in the upcoming election has led them to address the question: 'what is the Act supposed to achieve?' View the <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">State of Competition website</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:27:56 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves coal collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has released its   final determination allowing Cockatoo Coal, Cuesta Coal, MetroCoal,   Peabody Energy Australia PCI, QC Resource Investments and Whitehaven   Coal to collectively negotiate with SunWater for water supply, in   relation to the development of the Nathan Dam project in central   Queensland.'  The authorisation is for an initial period of 23 years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1102978/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1086688" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christine Parker on the supermarket duopoly</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Christine Parker has an item in the Conversation today discussing issues associated with the market power of Coles and Woolworths, prompted by the ACCC's investigations into allegations of unconscionable conduct. <a href="http://theconversation.edu.au/acccs-inquiry-into-supermarket-bullying-misses-the-real-issue-of-duopoly-power-12247" target="_blank">View article</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC refuses request to release redacted version of its Master Coordination Agreement with Emirates</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[As part of it's ongoing consideration of the Qantas/Emirates <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation application</a> the ACCC has asked Qantas to release a redacted version of its MCA with Emirates; Qantas has refused, claiming that its 'applications and supporting submissions adequately described the conduct   for which the applicants seek authorisation and provide sufficient   detail to enable the competition effects of the proposed conduct to be   assessed and for the interested parties to comment'. See Steve Creedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/qantas-rebuffs-accc-over-master-coordination-agreement-with-emirates/story-e6frg95x-1226578916996" target="_blank">Qantas rebuffs ACCC over Master Coordination Agreement with Emirates</a>' (The Australian, 15 February 2013)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:05:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shopper dockets under investigation ... again</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In his column today John Durie discusses the ACCC's investigation into shopper dockets (see John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-finalising-fuel-shopper-docket-probe/story-fn91v9q3-1226577586487" target="_blank">ACCC looks at supermarket treatment of suppliers, fuel shopper-dockets</a>' (The Australian, 14 February 2013))]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:05:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise ANF/Tatts collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093189/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft   decision</a> proposing to allow the Australian Newsagents&rsquo; Federation (ANF)   and its members to collectively bargain with Tatts Lotteries SA for a   period of five years'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1101898/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093189/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:05:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>eRx Scipt exchange authorisation proposed</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to grant   authorisation to eRx Script Exchange to allow it to enter into a   contract with MediSecure. This will facilitate interoperability between   the parties&rsquo; electronic pharmaceutical prescription exchange systems.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1101893/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1089686/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dentist authorisation proposed</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to allow   dental practitioners who operate in shared practices to reach agreements   on the fees they charge their patients, where at least one party to the   agreement is a member of the Australian Dental Association Inc.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1101877/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1088219/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:04:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pilbara contined: Competition Tribunal sets asides Minister's declaration of Robe and Hamersley lines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACT has handed down its decision in <a href="http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acompt/2013/2013acompt0002" target="_blank">Applications by Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd [2013] ACompT 2</a>. These applications arose as a result of the decision of the High Court in <em>The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal</em> (2012) 290 ALR 750 (<em>Pilbara HCA</em>) and relate to the declaration of the 'Robe' line and 'Hamersley' line (railway services) in October 2008, made under s 44H of the <em>TPA. </em>The Tribunal agreed with the applicants that the Minister had applied the wrong test to criterion (b) in s 44H(4) and set aside the declarations.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Virgin's proposed acquisition of 60% of Tiger</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+1188.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1100855&amp;trimFileName=MER13+1188.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on this proposed acquisition in which it states that its 'preliminary view is that the proposed acquisition may raise competition   concerns in the market for Australian domestic air passenger transport   services'. This relates to the 'risk of muted competition following the reduction in the number of   airline groups within Australia from three to two (excluding regional   airlines), and the loss of Tiger Australia as an independently owned   discount competitor'. The ACCC highlights concerns about the potential for coordinated conduct between Qantas/Jetsar and Virgin/Tiger in the future. The ACCC also indicates, however, that if it concluded Tiger would exit the market without the merger this would be 'highly relevant' to their assessment. The ACCC invites market submissions by 22 February with final decision expected on 14 March. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1100923/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1087532/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Heinz's proposed acquisition fo Rafferty's Garden</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER13+1190.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1100927&amp;trimFileName=MER13+1190.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on Heinz's proposed acquisition of Rafferty's Garden, noting its preliminary view is that the acquisition would combine the two largest suppliers of wet and dry infant food in Australia and it is therefore investigating whether the removal of Rafferty's would substantially lessen competition, 'paying particular attention to the height of barriers to entry or expansion and the degree of supermarket countervailing power'. Submissions are invited by 28 February with a decision deferred until 21 March. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1100928/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1087157/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to approve collective bargaining for central Queensland coal producers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093431/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determation</a> proposing to authorise certain central Queensland coal producers to collectively bargain with Adami Mining for access to its coal terminal and with Aurizon Network for access to rail infrastructure. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1101064/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093431" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CASE Associates revamp website</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Case Associates have given their <a href="http://www.casecon.com/asiapacific/" target="_blank">website</a> an overhaul - new pages on AsiaPacific. The site includes news, publications and seminar presentations - well worth a look.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to not oppose Virgin’s proposed acquisition of Skywest</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Skywest Airlines (Australia) by Virgin Australia. It has concluded that the acquisition is not likely to substantially lessen competition in any relevant market because of the limited direct overlap between their existing services. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1099837/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1099824/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues statement of issues for proposed acquisition of Country Electronics by Gallagher</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1099905&amp;nodeId=eaa8316b33a56c4be36c882310d53cba&amp;fn=Gallagher Group proposed acquisition of Country Electronics - Statement of Issues - 31 January 2013.pdf" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> relating to this proposed acquisition. Submissions are due by 15 February. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1099912/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1086773/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:23:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CASE Associates revamp website</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Case Associates have given their <a href="http://www.casecon.com/asiapacific/" target="_blank">website</a> an overhaul - new pages on AsiaPacific. The site includes news, publications and seminar presentations - well worth a look.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Competition blog</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>In December 2012 King&amp;Wood Mallesons launched a new blog - In <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">Competition</a> - and it's well worth watching. It covers a range of jurisdictions and represents the expertise of dozens of lawyers from the Australian office. It is possible to view the blog by categories (eg, mergers, cartels), jurisdiction or sector and it is fully searchable. Terrific for keeping on top of all things competition, particularly as they relate to Australia (although my favorite post remains '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2012/12/may-the-force-be-with-disney/" target="_blank">May the Force be with Disney</a>' - mergers and Star Wars in a single blog piece - fantastic!)</p> <p><em>This news falls into the better late than never category; travelling has not been conducive to keeping the news page updated, but back on track now ...</em></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining by chicken growers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
The ACCC 'has issued a final decision allowing broiler chicken growers, who are   members of Queensland Chicken Growers Association, to collectively   bargain with Inghams, Baiada and Golden Cockerel for ten years.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1099006" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1089168" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose proposed acquisition of Boral's NSW concrete masonry business by Austral</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
The ACCC has announced it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Boral's NSW concrete masonry business by Austral Masonry. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1098987/fromItemId/2332">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1098932" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:23:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interim authorisation for Qantas/Emirates alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>The ACCC has granted interim authorisation ot the alliance between Qantas and Emirates. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1098063/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>, including <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153/fromItemId/278039/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">interim authorisation</a>. Neat summary by Kim de Kock at In Competition - '<a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2013/01/interim-take-off-for-qantas-and-emirates/" target="_blank">Interim Tkae Off For Qantas and Emirates</a>'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny authorisation for electrical goods pricing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
The ACCC has 'issued a draft decision proposing to deny authorisation to Narta   International Pty Ltd for proposed arrangements that would enable it to   set a minimum advertising price on a wide range of electrical goods.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1098057/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1080397" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. See also <a href="http://www.incompetition.com.au/2013/01/one-price-isnt-right-accc-proposes-to-deny-authorisation-of-minimum-pricing-for-electrical-goods/" target="_blank">In Competition blog item</a> by Monique Nymeyer.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:21:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fortune Telling: Australian Competition Law in 2013</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>"Trying to predict the future is like trying to drive down a country road at night with no lights while looking out the back window." Predicting the path of Australian competition law in 2013 may be more difficult still. It is an election year in Australia and, if history is any guide, this will generate some populist political promises, frequently at odds with sound competition policy. Political debate is likely to focus on the need, or otherwise, for a major review of Australia's competition laws and see philippics over who's policies are most likely to support small business, or curtail the market power allegedly enjoyed by big supermarkets, banks, and petrol companies.

Also, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("ACCC") is likely to have an active schedule in 2013, having repeatedly touted an increase in competition law litigation, particularly where it might be useful to resolve ambiguity in the law. It is also possible we will witness our first criminal cartel prosecution this year, although the effect of the election on the ACCC's appetite for litigation remains to be seen. On the merger front, following a significant defeat in the courts late in 2011, the ACCC's merger processes were under close scrutiny in 2012 and this will continue into 2013 with the possibility of an update to the merger process guidelines to reflect new ACCC practice.

It is also likely that throughout the year attention will focus on Australia's essential facilities access regime, currently undergoing a major review by the Productivity Commission.

In brief, we can expect an active-if somewhat unpredictable-year for competition law and policy in Australia.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:23:39 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise Qantas/Emirates alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC proposed to grant conditional authorisation for an alliance between Qantas and Emirates.The condition relates to restricting the operation of the alliance between Australia and New Zealand. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1094724/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153" target="_blank">merger register</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft decision</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:51:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Telstra's proposed acquisition of Adam Internet</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1094727&amp;nodeId=4430dbd876e12dacce23acd165d6ddab&amp;fn=Telstra%20Corporation%20Limited%20proposed%20acquisition%20of%20Adam%20Internet%20Pty%20Ltd%20-%2020%20December%202012.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on this proposed acquisition, noting that its preliminary view is that 'proposed acquisition is likely to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the supply of retail fixed voice and broadband services'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1094731" target="_blank">press release</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1086558/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose Carsales acquisition of Trading Post</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will oppose the proposed acquisition by Carsales.com of Trading Post assets, concluding that the proposed acquisition would be 'likely to result in a substantial lessening of competition through the removal of a close and effective competitor of Carsales'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1094733" target="_blank">press release</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1094677" target="_blank">merger register</a>. The merger review was commenced on 30 April - 113 calendar days prior to this announcement (although the ACCC claims 65 review days, excluding weekends, public holidays and time during which review was suspended (2-21 November)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:51:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RPM undertakings accepted from Oticon</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has accepted enforceable undertakings from Oticon Australia Pty Ltd, which has acknowledged engaging in resale price maintenance in the supply of hearing aids. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1094524/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thai Airways to pay $7.5million for price fixing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Thai Airways is the latest (the 13th) airline to the penalised for its participation in cartel conduct relating to fuel and other surcharges - the Federal Court has ordered it to pay $7.5 million in penalties. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1094013/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise coordination for Jetstar joint ventures</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1063283/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to authorise coordination between four Asian based Jetstar branded joint ventures. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093731/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1063283" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC alleges cartel conduct by Yazaki Corporation and Australian Arrow</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has instituted proceedings against Yazaki Corporation and its Australian subsidiary, Australian Arrow Pty Ltd. It alleges they engaged in 'cartel conduct, market sharing and price fixing, in relation to the   supply of wire harnesses to Toyota Motor Corporation and its related   entities in Australia'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1093615/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:49:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State of Competition - year in review</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The final <a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_9_2012_Review_.pdf" target="_blank">State of Competition for 2012</a> is out now. It provides an overview of key competition and consumer law issues for 2012; in particular, we have mergers, the new ACL (and sympathy for those tackling regulation 90), price fixing, access and personnel changes at the ACCC. It also has a neat picture of a dragon, a selection of 'favorite 2012 headlines' well worth a look and another reference to 'the force'. Must read issue. Thanks to Rachel, Alex and Rhonda for this terrific new publication and I look forward to reading more in 2013.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v Woolworths over merger procedure</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A bit of media this week about Woolworths and the ACCC and the breakdown in discussions over streamlined merger processes. See, for example, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Woolworths-hits-back-at-ACCC-claims-pd20121211-2V6RZ?OpenDocument" target="_blank">Woolworths hits back at ACCC claims</a>' (Business Spectator, 11 December 2012), Blair Speedy, &quot;<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-wont-slow-woolworths-growth/story-fn91v9q3-1226534036610" target="_blank">ACCC 'won't slow Woolworths' growth</a>' (The Australian, 11 December 2012), Cara Waters, '<a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/advertising-and-marketing/053345-woolworths-ditches-agreement-with-accc-on-retail-acquisitions-2.html" target="_blank">Woolworths ditches agreement with ACCC on retail acquisitions</a>' (10 December 2012, Smart Company) and Eli Greenblat, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/woolworths-shelves-accc-talks-on-buy-ups-20121207-2b12y.html" target="_blank">Woolworths shelves ACCC talks on buy up</a>s' (The Age, 8 December 2012). Agreement has been reached with Coles for a trial period of six months. Woolworths has indicated that while it agrees that a streamlined process for acquisitions is required, that process should apply to all, not just the supermarket industry.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:38:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wants more help from corporate Australia to streamline merger process</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Annabel Hepworth and Damon Kitney, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/no-let-up-in-accc-merger-scrutiny/story-fn91v9q3-1226529259519" target="_blank">No let-up in ACCC merger scrutiny</a>' (The Australian, 4 December 2012, pages 19-20) report on the ACCC's priorities for 2013, including reviewing its informal review process guidelines. No groundbreaking developments on the merger front.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition out now</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a19845714e72d615771c64903/files/TSoC_Issue_8_Price_fixing_agents_.pdf" target="_blank">This month's State of Competition</a> focusses on agency agreements and price fixing and, most signifcantly, has a picture of YODA on the front mpage which makes it quite irresistable. Issue 8 (Nov 2012) is written by Alexandra Merrett and Rachel Trindade and is headed 'Flights of fancy or hard core cartels? When agents (allegedly) price fix' - abstract as follows:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>'Price fixing is perhaps the best known of Australia's per se prohibitions: regardless of any impact on competition or the prices ultimately paid by consumers, competitors can't agree on prices. 'Competitors' is generally thought to be a straightforward term which does not encompass agents. But some recent cases highlight how agents and other commercial partners can find themselves in price fixing trouble. One of those cases, USA v Apple, also raises interesting issues regarding market power, market share and most favoured nation clauses.'</p></blockquote>
<p>As always with SoC (<a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank">archives here</a>), well worth a read - interesting (and entertaining) analysis both of the <a href="http://www.justce.gov/atr/cases/applebooks.html" target="_blank">USA v Apple case</a> and ACCC's battle with Flight Centre over allegations Flight Centre price fixed by attempted to stop principals from undercutting its own prices (the authors obvserve that the 'ACCC is trying to push the boundaries of what constitutes a competitor'. </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by Qld chicken growers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Queensland chicken growers collectively bargain under an authorisation provided by state legislation; authorisation will allow them to continue absent the statutory exemption. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1091478/fromItemId/142" target="new">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1089168/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Tabcorp</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has granted interim authorisation to Tabcorp Wagering Manager (Vic) to   give effect to an agreement with ACTTAB under which Tabcorp will provide   fixed odds wagering and risk management services in return for a   management fee.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1091476/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose acquisition by Nestle of Pfizer Nutrition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1090736/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC has announced</a> it 'would not oppose the proposed acquisition of Pfizer Nutrition, a global infant nutrition business, from Pfizer Inc by Nestlé S.A after accepting a court enforceable undertaking.' The merger involes two of the three largest suppliers of infant formula and significant undertakings were required prior to approval - in particular, the undertaking 'requires Nestlé to sell an exclusive ten year licence for Pfizer Nutrition’s infant nutrition S-26/SMA brand portfolio in Australia, followed by a further ten year ‘black out’ period in which Nestlé would not be permitted to re-enter the markets with Pfizer’s brands.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1090709" target="_blank">mergers register</a> (includes undertakings)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CCC releases Content Access Report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Competitive Carriers' Coalition (CCC) has released a paper entitled: '<a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/wqa3yflx2uiti7l/CCC%20Content%20Access%20Report%2013%20Nov%202012.pdf" target="_blank">Exploring Content-Related Competition Issues: Will Excluisve Content Rigts be the New Bottleneck in the Australian Telecommunications Sector?</a>' (prepared by Windsor Place Consulting and dated 18 October 2012). It makes several recommendations in relation to , including that the ACCC should have power to put in place an '<em>ex ante </em>regulatory regime for content-related competition issues ...' (p 35). </p>
<p>This has attracted some media - see, for example, Adam Bender, '<a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/441983/competitors_protest_telstra_dominance_content/?fp=4&amp;fpid=78268965" target="_blank">Competitors protest Telstra's dominance on content</a>' (Computerworld, 14 November 2012), John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/as-the-man-said-content-is-key/story-e6frg9io-1226516937460" target="_blank">As the man said, content is key</a>' (The Australian, 15 November 2012) and John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/content-not-distribution-is-the-real-issue-in-broadcasting/story-e6frg9io-1226516587817" target="_blank">Content, not distribution, is the real issue in broadcasting</a> ' (The Australian, 14 November 2012) and Harrison Polites, '<a href="http://www.technologyspectator.com.au/current-digital-content-regulation-failing-consumers-ccc" target="_blank">Current digital content regulation failing consumers: CCC</a>' (Technology Spectator, 14 November 2012) </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:52:23 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC commences publc consultation on NBN SAU</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has commenced its 'first public consultation on <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1080594" target="_blank">NBN Co Special Access Undertaking</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1089182/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1089145&amp;nodeId=fff0a7cffbb16f12e17e8bdf3312d67d&amp;fn=ACCC%20Consultation%20Paper%20on%20NBN%20Co%202012%20Special%20Access%20Undertaking%20(12%20November%202012).pdf" target="_blank">consultation paper</a>. Interested parties have untl 11 January 2013 to make a submssion.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:56:46 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises fee free ATMs in remote Indigenous communities</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p> The ACCC 'has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+163344.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1088767&amp;trimFileName=D12+163344.pdf" target="_blank">authorised</a> an initiative to reduce total ATM fees in very remote Indigenous communities, involving a number of banks and ATM deployers'. The initiative is coordinated by the Australian Bankers' Association (ABA) and covers 76 existing ATMs. The ACCC considers the initiative will 'help to alleviate financial and social disadvantage for Indigenous people living in very remote communities by addressing the issue of high ATM usage and removing fees for certain transactions.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1088771/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1056046" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:56:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise SuperTAB pool agreements between wagering operators</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p> The ACCC '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+162963.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1088642&amp;trimFileName=D12+162963.pdf" target="_blank">proposes to grant authorisation</a> to Tabcorp Wagering Manager (Vic) Pty Ltd to give effect to two agreements it has entered into with Racing and Wagering WA (RWWA) and ACTTAB Limited for a period of six years.' The ACCC considers that the agreements are 'likely to result in benefits to the public by improving the stability of the totalisator pools offered by RWWA and ACTTAB' and that any competitive harm will be limited. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1088648/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1065681" target="_blank">authoristaion register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:55:16 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise contract talks for Queensland concrete cartage owner-drivers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>The ACCC is <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+162800.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1088662&amp;trimFileName=D12+162800.pdf" target="_blank">'proposing to grant authorisation</a> allowing truck owner-drivers in Queensland, who are providing concrete cartage services, to collectively bargain with Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1088647/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1076105" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:54:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow collective bargaining for potato growers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>The ACCC '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+161632.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1088228&amp;trimFileName=D12+161632.pdf" target="_blank">proposes to authorise</a> the South East Potato Growers Association and the Victorian Potato Growers Council and their members to collectively bargain with potato buyers', stating that it could potentially lead 'to a more efficient Australian potato growing industry. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1088226/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1065470/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:54:02 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chemical company admits engaging in RPM</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>'Chemical Formulators Pty Ltd (Chemform), a manufacturer and supplier of commercial cleaning products, has acknowledged that it engaged in resale price maintenance in court-enforceable undertakings provided to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission': <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1087930/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:53:26 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Site makeover</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description>I've given the site a modest makeover today; there will be a few teething issues as I check through the code on each page, so please bear with me over the next few days as I sort this out.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:52:50 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Virgin activity</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Virgin claims it's deal to take a majority stake in Tiger Airways and to take over Skywest will promote competition and create jobs. The ACCC has expressed some concern about the impact of two companies controlling the market. See various items in today's Financial Review - in particular, Andrew Cleary, 'Sims vows scrutiny of Virgin deals' (AFR, 31 October 2012, p 17 - reporting that Sims has vowed to examine the deals "extremely closely, extremely deeply") and Matthew Stevens, 'Sims, Australia's sky marshal' (AFR, 31 October 2012, p 36) See also Steve Creedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/accc-to-probe-virgins-tiger-bid/story-e6frg95x-1226507017563" target="_blank">ACCC to probe Virgin's Tiger bid</a>' (The Australian, 31 October 2012, p 3) and John Durie, 'Sims a paassenger as Virgin takes off' (The Australian, 31 October 2012, p 28)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:21:44 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State of Competition Issue 7 out now</title>
      <link>http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/newsletter/issue-7-football-substitutes-a-primer-in-market-definition/</link>
      <description>Issue 7 of the State of Competition (authored this month by Rachel Trindade and Rhonda L Smith) and provides a primer in market definition, discussed with particular reference to sport in Australia - another great read.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:20:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prof Stephen Calkins delivers third annual Baxt Lecture</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.wayne.edu/profile/stephen.calkins/" target="_blank">Professor Stephen Calkins</a>, currently <a href="http://www.tca.ie/en/About-Us/Members.aspx" target="_blank">Director of the Mergers Division at the Irish Competition Authority</a>, today delivered the <a href="http://clen.law.unimelb.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=0EC6BDC7-BEB5-A782-E97580C4009484B1&amp;flushcache=1&amp;showdraft=1" target="_blank">third annual Baxt Lecture</a> (hosted by Melbourne University's <a href="http://clen.law.unimelb.edu.au/" target="_blank">CLEN</a>) on the topic: The Global Conversation about Merger Review and Powerful Buyers.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:52:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eternal Beauty to pay penalties and costs of $100,000 for resale price maintenance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The 'Federal Court in Melbourne has imposed penalties of $90,000 against Eternal Beauty Products Pty Ltd (Eternal Beauty) and its Director, Penny Rider, a wholesaler and retailer of skin care products and its only Australian Director, for engaging in resale price maintenance.'. View ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1086078/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2012/1124.html" target="_blank">Federal Court judgment</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:50:49 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$10m price fixing fine for Emirates</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Emirates has been ordered to pay a total of $10m in penalties for engaging in cartel conduct. Emirates is the tenth airline to settle proceedings relating to the cartel. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1084600/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">media release.</a>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:13:43 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose Seven Group Holding's proposed acquisition of Consolidated Media Holdings</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1084351/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">today announced</a> that it will oppose the proposed acquisition by Seven of the balance of shares that it does not already own in Consolidated Media Holdings.  The ACCC concluded that the 'proposed acquisition would lead to Seven having substantial interests in a major free to air network and the largest subscription television company in Australia, as well as a 50% shareholding in the company involved in the acquisition of the rights to the majority of Australian sports that are broadcast by FOXTEL.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1084318" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:13:19 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose Sonic's acquisition of Healthscope's pathology business in Queensland</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'announced it will oppose the proposed acquisition by Sonic Healthcare Limited (Sonic) of Healthscope Limited’s (Healthscope) pathology business in Queensland' concluding that the acquisition would be 'likely to have the effect of substantially lessening competition in the market for the supply of community pathology services in Queensland.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1084137" target="_blank">merger register</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1084339/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:12:36 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose Woolworths/Lowe's proposed acquisition of G Gay &amp; Co hardware stores</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'today announced it will oppose the proposed acquisition by the Woolworths/Lowe's Joint Venture (Woolworths) of an independent chain of three hardware stores owned by G Gay & Co in Ballarat, Victoria', concluding that 'the proposed acquisition is likely to result in a substantial lessening of competition through the removal of what will be one of Woolworths' two closest competitors in the Ballarat area'.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1083101/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1083070" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:10:25 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qantas/Emirates withdraw application for early interim authorisation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>The ACCC yesterday announced that Qantas and Emirates have withdrawn their application for interim authorisation to plan and negotiate their proposed alliance.  The ACCC will continue to examine the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153" target="_blank">substantive authorisation application</a> and they note the companies 'believe that they are able to undertake a significant amount of preparatory work without the need for interim authorisation.'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1083089/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. See also Ross Kelly, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444223104578035220515012496.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">Qantas, Emirates Withdraw Bid For Early Approval</a> (Wall Street Journal, 4 October 2012)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:09:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State of Competition - Issue 6: Howzat! The ACCC's war on mergers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The latest State of Competition is out and this time it's all about mergers and the time taken and nature of ACCC merger review - a must read, including a peek at 1976 photo's of authors Rachel Trindade anbd Alexandra Merrett (you need to read it to understand it!). <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/newsletter/issue-6-howzat-the-acccs-war-on-mergers/" target="_blank">View issue 6</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:09:22 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Virgin urges ACCC to refuse Qantas/Emirates interim authorisation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Virgin has lodged a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+142209.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1080737&amp;trimFileName=D12+142209.pdf" target="_blank">submission</a> with the ACCC arguing that there is no justification or necessity for interim authorisation and that full assessment of the competitive implications of the proposed Qantas/Emirates alliance should occur before any authorisation is provided. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+142213.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1080737&amp;trimFileName=D12+142213.pdf" target="_blank">Air New Zealand</a>, <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+139886.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1080737&amp;trimFileName=D12+139886.pdf" target="_blank">JumpJet Airlines Limited</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+142248.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1080737&amp;trimFileName=D12+142248.pdf" target="_blank">Singapore Airlines</a> have also made a submission arguing that the interim authorisation not be granted. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078153/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. On the other hand, the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+142208.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1080737&amp;trimFileName=D12+142208.pdf" target="_blank">Department of Infrastructure and Transport</a> and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+142707.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1080737&amp;trimFileName=D12+142707.pdf" target="_blank">Tourism Victoria</a> support the application for interim authorisation. See also Steven Creedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/virgin-tells-accc-to-deny-qantas-deal/story-e6frg95x-1226480584013" target="_blank">Virgin tells ACCC to deny Qantas Deal</a>' (The Australian, 25 September 2012)</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:08:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Woolworths' proposed acquisition of supermarket site in Glenmore Ridge</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER12+10910.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1079889&amp;trimFileName=MER12+10910.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on this proposed acquisition. 'The ACCC’s preliminary view is that the proposed acquisition is likely   to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the local   Glenmore Park market.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1079898/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1060730" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:08:15 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves collective bargaining for Sural Basin coal producers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+140187.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1079837&amp;trimFileName=D12+140187.pdf" target="_blank">authorised</a> Cockatoo Coal and Stanmore Coal to collectively bargain   with the Surat Basin Rail joint venture for access to its new rail line   in Queensland.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1079921/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1055934" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:06:29 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves Outdoor Media Operations Pty Ltd proposed acquisition of EYE</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has concluded that it will not oppose the acquisition of Eye Corp from Outdoor Media Operations, noting that they did not consider the acquisition would substantially lessen competition in either 'the national market for the supply of out of home advertising services; or 'the national market for the acquisition of out of home advertising sites.' View press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1079598/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">release</a>. See also Darren Davidson, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-approves-tens-sale-of-eye/story-e6frg8zx-1226478141049" target="_blank">ACCC approves Ten's sale of Eye</a>' (The Australian, 20 September 2012)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:05:02 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Distributor of baby products gives court enforceable undertaking for RPM</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Valiant Enterprises Pty Ltd 'has acknowledged that it engaged in resale price maintenance in court-enforceable undertakings provided to the' ACCC. 'In July 2011, Valiant Enterprises attempted to induce an online retailer not to advertise the AngelCare AC1100 baby monitor for sale at a price less than that specified by Valiant Enterprises, including by suggesting that stock may be withheld from the retailer.' View press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1079665/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:59:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and China's State Administration for Industry and Commerce sign MOU</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) of the People's Republic of China signed a Memorandum of Understanding today. View press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1079582/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:58:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose acquisition of EMI Group Global Limited by Universal Music Holdings Limited and Vivendi SA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'liaised closely with international competition regulators including the New Zealand Commerce Commission, the European Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, throughout the investigation of the proposed acquisition' and became the fourth country to approve the $billion+ deal. The ACCC concluded that the acquisition was not likely to substantially lessen competition in the Australian based markets for 'the signing of artists & repertoire (A&R)', 'wholesale supply of physical recorded music', 'wholesale supply of digital recorded music' and 'the retail supply of digital music.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1079265/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also Christie Eliezer, '<a href="http://www.themusicnetwork.com/music-features/industry/2012/09/20/why-the-accc-approved-the-universalemi-deal/" target="_blank">Why the ACCC approved the Universal/EMI deal</a>' (The Music Network, 20 September 2012). Kathy McCabe, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/music/emi-buy-out-will-cost-fans/story-e6frf9hf-1226477501164" target="_blank">Independent labels warn Universal-EMI super label will cost music fans</a>' (Herald-Sun, 19 September 2012), AAP '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/ACCC-approves-Tens-sale-of-Eye-Corp-pd20120920-YB528?OpenDocument&amp;src=hp4" target="_blank">ACCC approves Ten's sale of Eye Corp</a>' (Business Spectator, 20 September 2012) </p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:58:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pilbara v ACT [2012] HCA 36</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court today ruled in<em> <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2012/36.html" target="_blank">Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal</a></em><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2012/36.html"> [2012] HCA 36</a>. In the matters M155/2011, M156/2011 and M157/2011 the appeal was allowed; the court set 'aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 4  May 2011 and 16 May 2011 and, in their place,  order that a writ of certiorari,  directed to the Australian Competition Tribunal, issue to quash the Australian  Competition Tribunal's  determination the subject of the proceeding' and remitted the matter to teh Tribunal for determination. In matters M45/2011 and M46/2011 the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.</p>
<p>At para 120 the majority concluded: 'The Full Court concluded that Fortescue's application for judicial review should be dismissed because the Tribunal found[132] that it could not be satisfied that it was not profitable to build rail lines that would duplicate the services to which Fortescue had sought access. But again, the conclusions reached by the Tribunal in this respect were reached on evidence and material far beyond the evidence and material to which it should have had regard in conducting a review of the kind required by the Act. There having been no review by the Tribunal of the kind for which the Act provided, the orders made by the Full Court of the Federal Court in these matters should be set aside. In their place there should be orders in each matter that a writ of certiorari, directed to the Tribunal, issue to quash the Tribunal's determination the subject of that proceeding. The matters should be remitted to the Tribunal for determination according to law.'</p>
<p>In a separate judgment Justice Heydon also allowed the appeal, noting [at 195] that these had been 'extraordinarily protracted proceedings'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:14:03 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases statement of issues for ConsMedia merger </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1061153" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the possible acquisition by Seven of ConsMedia. The SoI notes preliminary competition concerns, in particular, concerns over 'the influence Channel Seven may be able to exert over FOX SPORTS Australia (which is 50% owned by Consolidated Media Holdings) in joint bids and other commercial arrangements in relation to sports rights.'  Submissions on the SoI are invited by 27 September 2012 with a final decision deferred until 11 October. </p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078843/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.  See also Bryan Firth, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-keen-to-ensure-free-to-air-broadcasters-have-a-sporting-chance/story-e6frg9kx-1226473748013" target="_blank">ACCC keen to ensure free-to-air broadcasters have a sporting chance</a>' (The Australian, 14 September) and Ross Kelly, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wall-street-journal/accc-may-be-drawing-line-in-the-sand/story-fnay3vxj-1226473501641" target="_blank">ACCC may be drawing line in the sand</a>' (The Australian, 13 September)</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:58:19 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Current ACCC Priorities</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078927/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">speech</a> to the Australia Israel Chamber of Commerce WA, Rod Sims 'made it clear that mergers and acquisitions in concentrated markets will be subject to close scrutiny' and that there are currently 35 separate investigations 'misuse of market power, cartels, or cases involving lessening of competition'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078945/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:57:51 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC outlines petrol retailing issues</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Rod Sims addressed the Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association Annual Conference today, discussing issues of misuse of market power and unconscionable conduct. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078587/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">speech</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078734/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:49:42 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to TWU (Qld)</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has granted conditional interim authorisation to allow the Transport Workers Union (Queensland Branch) to commence collective bargaining negotiations on behalf of concrete-truck owner-drivers contracted with Hanson in Queensland'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078768/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:49:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective dealings between private hospitals</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has authorised the St Vincent's Health Australia Group and St Vincent's Private Hospital Sydney to engage in collective and joint activity' including 'information sharing, collective bargaining and agreements not to deal with particular third parties'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1078755/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:48:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Garuda Airlines not entitled to immunity</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2012/33.html" target="_blank">High Court</a> today ruled Garuda Airlines (95% sharholdings owned directly by the Republic of Indonesia) could not claim immunity from Part IV cartel procedings under the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fsia1985288/" target="_blank">Foreign States Immunity Act</a>. This is because it had carried on business in Australia for a number of years and s 11(1) of the Act provides that 'A foreign State is not immune in a proceeding in so far as the proceeding concerns a commercial transaction.' The Court concluded: 'The arrangements and understandings into which the ACCC alleges Garuda entered were dealings of a commercial, trading and business character, respecting the conduct of commercial airline freight services to Australia. The definition of a &quot;commercial transaction&quot; is satisfied.' </p>
<p></p>See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-scores-against-garuda-airlines/story-e6frg9io-1226467668147" target="_blank">ACCC scores against Garuda Airlines</a>' (The Australian, 8 September 2012) and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1077934/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:47:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Marker out now</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC's cartel video is <a href="http://youtu.be/louVP9VvFlg" target="_blank">out now</a>. Ass <a href="experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Professor Caron Beaton-Wells</a>, who features in a <a href="http://youtu.be/X15LUQWubw8" target="_blank">video news release</a> promoting the film, has a piece about it on <a href="http://theconversation.edu.au/will-the-acccs-foray-into-film-make-its-mark-on-cartel-behaviour-9166" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> - 'Will the ACCC’s foray into film make its mark on cartel behaviour?'.</p> 
<p>See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1076469/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. See also video <a href="http://youtu.be/W4DP2jrZ0rA" target="_blank">Rod Sims video news release</a> and video message <a href="http://youtu.be/nM7q1Jr_eQo" target="_blank">from Qantas CEO, Alan Joyce</a>.</p>
<p><iframe width="400" height="225" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/louVP9VvFlg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:53:17 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel blockbuster coming soon</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is joining other competition regulators in producing videos to encourage whistleblowing of cartels. The film is called 'The Marker' and will run for 16 minutes. The ACCC was apparently inspried by similar video's produced in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r99qzC8aHA" target="_blank">Sweden</a> (which is hilarous), <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5diFAaJdweI" target="_blank">The Netherlands</a> (even better) and <a href="http://www.ccs.gov.sg/content/ccs/en/Media-and-Publications/Publications/CCS-Corporate-Trailer-View-ur-corporate-trailer-to-learn-more-about-the-harms-of-price-fixing-conspiracies-to-businesses-and-consumers.html" target="_blank">Singapore</a>. It will be sent to CEO's of Australia's 300 largest companies. See Ben Butler, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-films-life-and-crimes-of-cartel-crooks-20120829-2510j.html" target="_blank">ACCC films life and crimes of cartel crooks</a>' (SMH, 30 August 2012). ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:46:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to authorise fee free ATM's in remote Indigenous communities</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1056046" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to allow a number of banks and ATM deployers to provide fee free balances and withdrawals at selected existing ATMs in very remote Indigenous communities.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1076512/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:45:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC delays Sonic decision</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has delayed its merger decision in relation to <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1052712/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Sonic Healthcare's proposed takeover of Healthschope's east coast pathology business</a>. The review commenced on 18 May and a decision was to be announced Thursday. On Tuesday the ACCC requested further information from the merging parties and suspended the timeline. A new proposed decision date has yet to be announced. See also Madeleine Heffernan, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-delays-sonic-decision-20120829-24zmt.html" target="_blank">ACCC delays Sonic decision</a> (SMH, 29 August 2012)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:45:09 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC court action alleges Sydney forklift gas supply cartel</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has 'instituted proceedings in the Federal Court in Sydney against Renegade Gas Pty Ltd (trading as Supagas NSW, a privately owned company) and Speed-E-Gas (NSW) Pty Ltd (a wholly owned subsidiary of Origin Energy Limited)' alleging that they 'gave effect to an anti-competitive cartel arrangement which included not supplying liquid petroleum gas (LPG) cylinders for forklifts to each others' customers'. </p>
<p>The ACCC 'is seeking declarations, injunctions, pecuniary penalties and costs against Renegade Gas and Speed-E-Gas' and 'implementation of a trade practices compliance program by Renegade Gas'.
  
  The ACCC is also seeking 'declarations, injunctions, banning orders, pecuniary penalties and costs against' senior executives in the companies.
  
  A directions hearing is listed for the Federal Court in Sydney on 20 September 2012. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1075260/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:29:09 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows potato growers to continue negotiations while assessment is in progress</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC  'has granted interim authorisation to the South East Potato Growers Association and its members.' The existing authorisation (granted in 2012) will expire shortly - it relates to collective bargaining arrangements for Association members. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1075191/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:28:30 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC conditionally authorises collective bargaining for small private hospitals</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has granted conditional authorisation to allow prospective members of the Private Hospital Collective Bargaining Group to bargain collectively with suppliers and health funds'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1073882/fromItemId/621589" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1036396" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:24:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to approve collective bargaining for Surat Basin coal producers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to authorise Cockatoo Coal and Stanmore Coal to collectively bargain with the Surat Basin Rail joint venture for access to its new rail line in Queensland'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1070371/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1070371/fromItemId/621589" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:23:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC interim authorisation for SuperTAB</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'granted conditional interim authorisation to Tabcorp Wagering Manager (Vic) Pty Ltd to give effect to agreements which govern participation in the SuperTAB pool'. A draft decision on the substantive application will be issued in October. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1070159/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1065681/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:22:59 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Call for comment on Sonic Healthcare's proposed acquisition </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER12+8941.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1068298&amp;trimFileName=MER12+8941.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on 'on the proposed acquisition of the pathology businesses of Healthscope Limited in Queensland, NSW, ACT and WA by Sonic Healthcare Limited.'  Submissions are due by 16 August. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1068304/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1052712" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 07:21:25 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves News Corp acquisition of CMH</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC 'today announced that it would not oppose the proposed acquisition by News Corporation of 100 per cent of the shares in Consolidated Media Holdings Limited (CMH).  CMH has a 50 per cent shareholding in FOX SPORTS Australia, which owns 50 per cent of the shares in FOXTEL.'  The ACCC took the view that the acauisition was 'unlikely to lead to a substantial lessening of competition in any relevant market'.View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1068185/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1068182" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also Darren Davidson, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/accc-oks-news-consmedia-bid/story-e6frg996-1226441134270" target="_blank">ACCC approves News Corp's ConsMedia bid</a>' (2 August 2012) </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:40:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC investigating supermarkets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1068053/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">speech to the COSBOA National Small Business Summit</a> in Melbourne yesterday, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, reiterated that the ACCC was 'looking at concerns raised about the way in which the major supermarket chains deal with their suppliers' and noted that they related to the potential for unconscionable conduct and 'concerns over the misuse of market power, particularly in relation to private label products.' He also noted that the 'retail sector is under constant scrutiny in terms of mergers and acquisitions.' </p>
<p>Sims also re-iterated that the ACCC was investigating the competitve impact of shopper docket schemes, noting that the investigation would take some time. </p>
<p>See also Larissa Ham, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/trends/accc-takes-aim-at-supermarket-giants-20120802-23gut.html" target="_blank">ACCC takes aim at supermarket giants</a>' (2 August 2012)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:39:56 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective group dealings between private hospitals</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+113574.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1067979&amp;trimFileName=D12+113574.pdf" target="_blank">draft deterimination</a> proposing 'to allow St Vincent's Health Australia Group hospitals to engage in collective or joint activity', including 'information sharing, collective bargaining and agreements not to deal with a particular party' which will 'enable the applicants to operate as a single economic entity'.  The proposed authorisation will be for a period of 10 years.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1067891/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:39:18 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining by Tasmanian lottery agents</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC today authorised the 'Lottery Agents’ Association of Tasmania (LAAT) and its current and future members to collectively bargain with Tatts Group and Intralot Australia Pty Ltd for five years'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1067227/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:49:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves several authorisations</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC today granted </p>
<ul>
<li>'<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1067067/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">interim authorisation to the Victorian Potato Growers Council and its members to continue collectively negotiating contracts and keep doing business through contracts negotiated under the previous authorisation granted in 2007</a>'; </li>
<li>authorisation to an '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1067093/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">Affiliation Agreement between Emirates and Flydubai</a>, and separately, to a Commercial Alliance between Etihad and Air Berlin' and;</li>
<li>authorisation 'to <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1067090/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">Star Alliance</a> for its Corporate Plus, Conventions Plus and Meetings Plus programs for a period of eight years'.</li></ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:48:44 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises NBN Co / Optus HFC subscriber agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC yesterday "authorised an agreement between NBN Co and SingTel Optus for the migration of Optus' HFC subscribers to the NBN and the decommissioning of parts of Optus' HFC network. This decision confirms a draft decision issued by the ACCC in May 2012." ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, referreed to the decision as 'finally balanced'. (View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1066235/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1028348" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>). </p>
<p>Opposition communications spokesman, Malcolm Turnbull, has described the decision as "very black day": see <a href="http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/media/releases/a-dark-day-for-the-accc-as-it-abandons-competition-in-favour-of-a-government-monopoly/" target="_blank">Malcolm Turnbull, 'A dark day for the ACCC as it abandons competition in favour of a Government Monopoly' (Press Release, 20 July 2012)</a>n See also AAP, 'ACCC <a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/accc-optus-tick-anticompetitive-turnbull-20120720-22e99.html" target="_blank">Optus tick anti-competitive: Turnbull</a>' (SMH, 20 July 2012)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:08:25 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose Australian Leisure and Hospitality's proposed acquisition of the Caringbah Hotel</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC yesterday announced that it "does not propose to intervene in the proposed acquisition by Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group (ALH) and the Laundy Hotel Group of the Caringbah Hotel in NSW. Woolworths Limited has a direct 75 per cent interest in ALH. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1066230/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1066213" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>
<p>This has prompted and item in today's Australian Financial Review by Sue Mitchell - 'Woolies, ACCC at loggerheads on deals' (at p 3), in which she refers to the 'tense' relations between the ACCC and major supermarkets 'hehead of a crackdown on creeping acquisitions'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:07:48 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to not oppose acquisition by APA of HDF subject to divestiture</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has announced it &quot;would not oppose the proposed acquisition by APA Group (APA) of Hastings Diversified Utilities Fund (HDF) after accepting a court enforceable undertaking from APA to divest the Moomba to Adelaide Pipeline System (MAPS).&quot;  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1066211/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1066166" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:04:36 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks comment on proposed final access determination for non-NBN local bitstream access service</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has made an <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1034770" target="_blank">interim access determination</a> (IAD) for the declared local bitstream access service (LBAS) and is seeking comment on the proposed final access determination.' Submissions are due by 3 August. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1063883" target="_blank">press release</a>. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:05:44 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New competition law website</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Alexandra Merrett, Rhonda Smith and Rachel Trindade have started a new website - <a href="http://thestateofcompetition.com.au/" target="_blank"><em>The State of Competition</em>, Australia’s home of   competition law analysis</a>. It looks excellent and will include regular short pieces on topical issues in Australian competition policy. The first is on the topical issue of home brands: <em>Crying over spilt milk: buyer power and the rise of private labels</em>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:42:38 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes Australian Leisure and Hospitality's proposed acquisition of certain liquor assets in NSW</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC considers that 'the proposed acquisition by Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group (ALH) of five takeaway packaged liquor retailers in NSW (three of which are attached to hotels) would be likely to have the effect of substantially lessening competition in the relevant local markets. Woolworths Limited has a direct 75 per cent interest in ALH.'

View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1062489" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1062441" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:10:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC propses to authorise contract talks between Qld owner-driver group and car carrier</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to allow truck owner drivers in Queensland to bargain as a group with car carrier CEVA over contract terms, with Transport Workers' Union assistance.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1062365" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1050658" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:09:40 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise aviation alliances</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued two separate draft decisions which 'propose to grant authorisation to an Affiliation Agreement between <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1048657" target="_blank">Emirates and Flydubai</a>, and separately, a Commercial Alliance between <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1049483" target="_blank">Etihad and Air Berlin</a>.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1062124" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:09:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise Star Alliance programs</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[>The ACCC has issued a draft decision proposing to grant authorisation to Star Alliance for its 'Corporate Plus, Conventions Plus and Meetings Plus programs for eight years.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1062120" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1048663" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:08:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Battle for ConsMedia</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Lots of attention on the ACCC regarding media investments in the coming week, with both Seven and News Ltd's declaring interests in ConsMedia. See merger registers: <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1061153/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">Seven Group Holdings Limited - proposed acquisition of Consolidated Media Holdings Limited</a> (submissions due 13 July 2012; proposed decision on 2 August 2012) and <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1060359/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">News Corporation - proposed acquisition of Consolidated Media Holdings Limited</a> (submissions due 11 July 2012; proposed decision on 2 August 2012).</p>
<p>For media, see, eg, Adele Ferguson, <a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/sims-the-key-to-moguls-media-plans-20120624-20wg7.html" target="_blank">Sims the key to moguls' media plans</a> (Brisbane Times, 25 June 2012), Damon Kitney and Mitchell Bingemann, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/sevens-hurdles-in-battle-for-consmedia/story-e6frg996-1226408323747" target="_blank">Seven faces hurdles in battle for ConsMedia</a>' (The Australian, 26 June 2012) and Andrew Main and Damon Kitney, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/monday-section/kerry-stokes-bullish-on-consmedia-bid/story-fna1k39o-1226407040773" target="_blank">Kerry Stokes bullish on ConsMedia bid</a>' (The Australian, 25 June 2012). For a brief rant see Terry McCrann, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/terry-mccranns-column/watchdog-accc-in-another-universe/story-e6frfig6-1226408307691" target="_blank">Watchdog ACCC in another universe</a>' (Herald Sun, 26 June 2012) - or for a longer version see Terry McCrann, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/terry-mccranns-column/fairfax-stokes-very-different-strokes/story-e6frfig6-1226408305912" target="_blank">Fairfax, Stokes: very different strokes</a>' (Herald Sun, 26 June 2012)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:41:51 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC and hardware</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has delayed consideration of Woolworths' proposed takover of hardware group G Gay &amp; Co. It has requested further information. See John Durie, 'ACCC <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/accc-eyes-hardware-battle-with-woolworths/story-fn91v9q3-1226407028811" target="_blank">eyes hardware battle with Woolworths</a>' (The Australian, 25 June 2012)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:41:28 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues final access determination for regulated transmission services</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a final access determination for the declared domestic transmission capacity service (DTCS). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1061125" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1061126" target="_blank">access deterimination</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:28:12 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC invites comment on proposal to conditionally authorise collective bargaining for small private hospitals</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The ACCC 'is inviting submissions in response to its draft determination proposing to allow prospective members of the Private Hospital Collective Bargaining Group to bargain collectively with suppliers and health funds. The proposed authorisation would be subject to a condition limiting the size of the bargaining group, and it would also allow the hospitals to share certain information for benchmarking purposes.' View press release. View authorisation register.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:27:12 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Australian Bankers' Association</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has granted interim authorisation to a number of banks and ATM suppliers to enable them to provide fee free withdrawals and balance transactions at 76 currently identified ATMs across a range of very remote Indigenous communities.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1060643" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1056046" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:28:55 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interim authorisation for Surat Basin coal producers to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'granted interim authorisation to allow Cockatoo Coal and Stanmore Coal to commence collective negotiations with the Surat Basin Rail joint venture. The collective negotiation arrangements relate to access to a proposed rail system which will connect the Surat Basin coal mines to the export supply chain for the first time.'   View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1055934" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1060405" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:26:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC suspends assessment of NBN Co special access undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced that it has suspended "its assessment of the Special Access Undertaking (SAU) lodged by NBN Co in the expectation that NBN Co will soon lodge a revised undertaking."  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1060338" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:26:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining by Inghams' South Australian chicken growers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has authorised South Australian broiler chicken growers to collectively bargain with Inghams for ten years.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1059061" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1040237" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:25:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims addresses CEDA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke at the CEDA conference today discussing communication strategy, its approach to reviewing small retail acquisitions and competition in relation to electricity. </p>
<p>In relation to mergers he notes that the ACCC notes that it has been paying 'increased attention to incremental acquisitions' in relation to a number of retail areas, inclduing liquor, grocery and home improvement sectors in which national chains are 'increasng their participation' to ensure that 'further acquisitions do not ultimately lead to retail or indeed wholesale industry structures that may adversely affect the competitiveness of these markets or reduce choice for consumers'. </p>
<p>However, in return for the major chains providing 'advanced notice of a wider range of acquisitions, and for particular information being provided upfront with each transaction, we would establish a dedicated team to assess these transactions within specified times. This way Wesfarmers and Woolworths would certainly know quickly whether we have significant concerns or not with a particular acquisition.'  The ACCC is in discussions with the major chains regarding this process. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1058873/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1058763" target="_blank">View speech</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:06:01 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Malaysia Airlines Cargo penalised $6 million for price fixing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court has penalised Malaysia Airlines Cargo Sdn Bhd $6 million for price fixing. This related to conduct occurring between 2002-2005. Justice Emmett also made orders restraining Malaysia Airlines Cargo 'from engaging in similar conduct for a period of five years and to   pay $500,000 towards the ACCC's costs'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1058878/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press ACCC release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:05:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Changes to merger procedure forecast</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, will outline new mergers in Sydney on Thursday in a speech to the Committee for Economic Development of Australia.  The Australian's John Durie reports that the speech will 'include a proposal that for more speedy small market mergers, the ACCC will grant immediate conditional clearance in return for more information from the parties earlier and an agreement not to sign the contracts until clearance is granted.' See John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-chairman-sims-negotiates-supermarket-wars/story-e6frg9io-1226391646996" target="_blank">ACCC chairman Sims negotiates supermarket wars</a>' (The Australian, 12 June 2012)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:44:20 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supermarket wars </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[National Party senator John Williams is lobbying of the federal government to change legislation to reduce the power of Coles and Woolworths - he's turning to Frank Zumbo for advice ... See, eg, Adele Ferguson, '<a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/heat-to-go-on-grocery-duopoly-20120611-2060e.html" target="_blank">Heat to Grow on Supermarket Duopoloy</a>' (Brisbane Times, 12 June 2012). See also Royce Millar, Melissa Fyfe, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/small-grocers-target-big-two-20120610-204gn.html#ixzz1xWiaLtri" target="_blank">Small grocers target big two</a>' (The Age 11 June 2012) ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:43:20 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC publications on price signalling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/pricesignalling.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1056925" target="_blank">Business snapshot</a>' publication on the new price signalling laws as well as a guidance on &quot;<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1056941" target="_blank">authorising and notifying price signalling conduct</a>&quot;.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:15:04 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wants price signalling extended to petrol</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I the wake of the introduction of price signalling laws, which currently apply only to the banking industry, it comes as no surprise that the ACCC has indicated it wants the laws extended to the petrol industry (see, eg, Rod Sims, '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1050214" target="_blank">ACCC Priorities in Enforcing Competition Law</a>' (speech delivered at Competition Law Conference, 5 May 2012). See further: Elysse Morgan, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-06/accc-price-fixing-laws/4056110" target="_blank">'ACCC urges extension of price-signalling ban</a>&quot; (ABC News, 6 June) </p>
<h3>6 June 2012 - Price signalling laws now in force</h3>
<p>The new price signalling laws, initially applying only the banking industry, are now in force. See the <span class="chart"><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/pricesignalling.html">price signalling</a> page for further details.</span>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:06:37 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose Glencore’s proposed acquisition of Viterra</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose Glencore Incorporated plc’s proposed acquisition of Viterra Inc, concluding that &quot;proposed acquisition would be unlikely to substantially lessen competition as post merger Glencore would continue to face competition from a number of significant competitors in the market for grain trading in South Australia.&quot; View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1057510" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1057441" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:46:42 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling laws now in force</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/pricesignalling.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The new price signalling laws, initially applying only the banking industry, are now in force. See the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/pricesignalling.html">price signalling</a> page for further details.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:27:57 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fels reports on taxi industry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Plenty of media on <a href="experts/fels-allan.html">Allan Fels</a>' draft report into the Victorian taxi industry, released last week - '<a href="http://www.taxiindustryinquiry.vic.gov.au/draft-report" target="_blank">Customers First: Service, Safety, Choice</a>'. See, for example, Julie Power, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/nsw-taxis-overcharge-underpay-says-fels-20120603-1zq4x.html#ixzz1wmn2O5PY" target="_blank">NSW taxis overcharge, underpay, says Fels</a>' (SMH, 4 June 2012), Pia Akerman, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/fels-flags-a-radical-revamp-for-toxic-taxis/story-e6frg6nf-1226377874625" target="_blank">Fels flags a radical revamp for toxic taxis</a>' (The Australian, 1 June 2012), Adele Ferguson, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/alls-not-fare-in-fels-battle-in-taxi-wars-20120603-1zq3e.html#ixzz1wmrz5QOZ" target="_blank">All's not fare in Fels battle in taxi wars</a>' (SMH, 4 June 2012).  In the <a href="http://www.taxiindustryinquiry.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/69029/TII-media-release-30-May-2012.pdf" target="_blank">media release</a> accompanying the draft report Fels claimed that the proposed reforms would 'inject more competition and consumer choice in the industry – and more targeted, effective regulation'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:43:06 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed acquisition of Caringbah Hotel by Australian Leisure &amp; Hospitality</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1056072&amp;nodeId=a5ea2da679674bab188a19e472c1e52b&amp;fn=ALH%20Group%20Pty%20Ltd%20proposed%20acquisition%20of%20the%20Caringbah%20Hotel%20-%2031%20May%202012.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of the Caringbah Hotel, located in the Caringbah area of Sydney, NSW, by ALH Group Pty Ltd'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1056082/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1018025" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 20:48:44 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise NBN Co / Optus HFC subscriber agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+79030.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1055178&amp;trimFileName=D12+79030.pdf" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation for an agreement   between NBN Co and SingTel Optus for the migration of Optus’ HFC   subscribers to the NBN and the decommissioning of parts of Optus’ HFC   network'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1055182/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1028348" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 20:47:56 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intent in competition law</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/king-stephen.html">Stephen King</a> has <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=8914" target="_blank">blogged his thoughts</a> on last week's <a href="http://clen.law.unimelb.edu.au/" target="_blank">Competition Law &amp; Economics Network</a> discussion group seminar by <a href="http://www.law.utk.edu/faculty/stucke/" target="_blank">Prof Maurice Stucke</a> (and takes a fair whack at (some) behavioural economists). The seminar discussed the issue of intent in competition law, with some interesting discussion on the different approaches taken in the US and Australia. View Stucke's paper: '<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1992761" target="_blank">Is Intent Relevant?</a>'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:25:56 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Full Federal Court dismisses cover pricing appeal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Full Federal Court has dismissed the appeal of Carmichael builders against findings that Carmichael 'engaged in illegal price controlling conduct known in the construction industry as ‘cover pricing’.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1054748" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.  View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011woollam.html">original case (TF Woollam &amp; Son Pty Ltd)</a>.  Appeal decision not yet available.</p>
<h3>24 May 2012 - ACCC will not oppose AGL's acquisition of Loy Yang Power]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:16:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose AGL's acquisition of Loy Yang Power</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has indicated it will not 'oppose the proposed acquisition by AGL Energy Limited (AGL) of Great Energy Alliance Corporation Pty Limited (GEAC), which owns Loy Yang Power (LYP)'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1054406" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1054402" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:16:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises service agreement between copyright collecting societies</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has authorised Viscopy Limited and Copyright Agency Limited to enter into a service agreement under which Copyright Agency Limited will provide various services to Viscopy Limited and its members.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1054659" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022091/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:15:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to Transport Workers Union Queensland Branch</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted conditional interim authorisation which will enable the Transport Workers Union, Queensland Branch 'and its members who supply services to CEVA Logistics, to commence negotiations with CEVA Logistics.'  View press <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1054540" target="_blank">release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1050658" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:15:02 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Delia Rickard appointed Deputy Chairperson of ACCC</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Federal Assistant Treasurer, David Bradbury, yesterday announced the apointment of Delia Rickard as a full time Deputy Chairperson of the ACCC.  The appointment is for a period of five years, beginning 4 June 2012. View <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2012/027.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=djba&amp;Year=&amp;DocType=" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 09:13:52 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC investigating online pricing deals</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has indicated it will investigate clothing importers making deals with online stores which inflate prices. See, eg, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-18/accc-to-probe-online-retail-deals/4019184?section=business" target="_blank">ACCC to probe online price deals</a>' (ABC News, 18 May 2012), Rachel Wells, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/national/accc-to-investigate-internet-clothing-deals-20120517-1ytnx.html" target="_blank">ACCC to investigate internet clothing deals</a>' (SMH, 18 May 2012) and Paddy Hintz, '<a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/money/high-price-of-buying-australian/story-e6frezc0-1226360039568" target="_blank">High price of buying Australian</a>' (The Courier-Mail, 18 may 2012).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:16:42 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Woolworths/Lowe's proposed acquisition of G Gay &amp; Co hardware stores</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1052666&amp;nodeId=910d02a0a119e09ec4d55b5d22afd2d2&amp;fn=Woolworths Limited and Lowes Companies Inc JV proposed acquisition of G Gay &amp; Co hardware Stores in Ballarat - 16 May 2012.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the Woolworths/Lowe's JV's proposed acquisition of three hardware stores. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1052686" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1032400" target="_blank">merger register</a>. Deadline for submissions is 1 June with decision deferred until July 5.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:30:39 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval to Emirates and Flydubai's Affiliation Agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'as granted interim authorisation for a proposed Affiliation Agreement between Emirates and the Dubai Aviation Corporation, trading as Flydubai.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1052684" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1048657" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:30:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval for Etihad and Air Berlin to start implementing their aviation alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has granted interim authorisation to Etihad Airways and Air Berlin to engage in joint pricing, scheduling and marketing of air passenger services between Germany and Australia.'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1052671" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1049483" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:29:34 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petrol Media</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Plenty of media coverage on the ACCC's investigation of petrol prices. See, for example, <a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/acccs-petrol-fixation-20120515-1yoxp.html" target="_blank">Malcolm Maiden, 'ACCC's petrol fixation' (Brisbane Times, 16 May 2012)</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:29:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling media</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC's petrol investigation has sparked some media coverage on the price signalling laws soon to be applied to the abnking industry. See, for example, <a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/accc-chews-at-muzzle-over-price-signalling-20120514-1yn01.html" target="_blank">Clancy Yeates, 'ACCC chews at muzzle over price signalling' (Brisbane Times, 15 May 2012)</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:28:38 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Corporate Alliance between Virgin Australia and Skywest Airline</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has granted authorisation to a Corporate Alliance between Virgin Australia and Western Australian carrier, Skywest Airlines for five years.  The Corporate Alliance will allow the airlines to offer bundled air passenger transport services to corporate customers who seek an integrated suite of charter, domestic and international services, such as mining companies with large fly-in-fly-out workforces'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1051205" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022673" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:27:57 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>King, Durie, Sims and Price Signalling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Stephen King <a href="opinions/king-2012-samuelinterview2.html" target="_blank">recently interviewed Graeme Samuel,</a> including discussing the new price signalling laws. In the interview, Samuel acknowledges that price signalling 'had little to do with the banks at all' and 'is really all about petrol' (last week his successor, <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1050214" target="_blank">Rod Sims, similarly observed</a> that the genesis for the laws was petrol and not banking practices). Samuel also notes that the changes to the laws as they passed through Parliament have rendered them next to useless. </p>
<p>Today the Australian's <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/theres-no-certainty-in-a-world-of-crisis/story-e6frg9io-1226349282398" target="_blank">Jamie Durie</a> referred to the interview and Sims' speech, noting the 'stupidity' of the price signalling laws. <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=8836&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=a-comment-to-john-durie-on-price-signalling" target="_blank">King has responded</a>, arguing that there are 'two parts to the price signalling laws - a really good bit and a   useless bit.' The useless bit, he says, is the portion dealing with public price disclosure. On the other hand, he argues that 'laws against private price disclosures are sensible and strong' and should be extended.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:27:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Law Conference</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="experts/hodgekiss-chris.html">Chris Hodgekiss'</a> <em>Competition Law Conference </em>was held in Sydney on the weekend. Among the speakers was ACCC Chairman, <a href="experts/sims-rod.html">Rod Sims</a>, who delivered a paper on '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1050214" target="_blank">ACCC Priorities in Enforcing Competition Law</a>'. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 11:26:40 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC investigates information sharing arrangements in the petrol industry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has commenced a formal investigation into price information sharing arrangements in the retail petrol industry'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1049774/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:26:11 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>APCA may continue operating High Value Clearning System</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has authorised APCA to continue operating its High Value Clearing System. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1049468/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:25:43 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICN 2012: New Chair, New Priorities</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ICN held its 11th annual conference in Rio de Janeiro last week. Eduardo Pérez Motta, head of Mexico's Federal Competition Commission (CFC) succeeds John Fingleton (Chief Executive of the United Kingdom's Office of Fair Trading) as chair.  View <a href="http://www.icnblog.org/?p=1906" target="_blank">ICN blog item</a>. View <a href="http://icn-rio.org/index.html" target="_blank">conference home page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:25:07 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases NBN non-discrimination guidelines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued 'final guidelines on non-discrimination for NBN and superfast telecommunications networks'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1047007/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:24:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC reauthorises arrangements for WA real estate and business agents</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has granted conditional authorisation to arrangements between the Real   Estate Institute of Western Australia (REIWA) and its members and   consumers in WA'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1046988/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1016848" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:24:00 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective recycling tenders by Hunter councils</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'authorised Hunter Resource Recovery and its member councils to collectively tender and contract for recycling services . View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1045627" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1023902" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:22:46 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining with Inghams</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has issued a draft decision proposing to allow South Australian broiler   chicken growers to collectively bargain with Inghams for ten years.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1045647/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1040237/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:08:35 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective recycling tenders</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has authorised Hunter Resource Recovery and its member councils to   collectively tender and contract for recycling services.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1045627/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1023902" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:08:14 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises collective bargaining for affordable funerals</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has re-authorised Retirees WA (Inc) to continue its collective   bargaining for members' access to basic, pre-paid, low cost funerals.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1045572/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1016608" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:07:51 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Furniture and bedding retailers to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has granted authorisation to arrangements which allow Homemakers   Furniture and Sleepzone Bedding retailers to collectively bargain with a   range of suppliers.' View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1045564" target="_blank"> press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022071" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:07:27 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves Foxtel acquisition of Austar</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose the acquisition of Austar by Foxtel - subject to court enforeceable undertakings. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1044888/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:44:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to announce decision on Austar-Foxtel merger on 10 April</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The timeline has recommenced in relation to the ACCC's informal assessment of the Austar-Foxtel merger with the proposed date for the ACCC's announcement now listed as 10 April. The review commenced on 26 May 2011. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a> (including timeline). See also, eg, Darrin Davidson, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/accc-to-announce-decision-on-austar-foxtel-merger-on-april-10/story-e6frg996-1226319655691" target="_blank">ACCC to announce decision on Austar-Foxtel merger on Tuesday</a>' (<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/accc-to-announce-decision-on-austar-foxtel-merger-on-april-10/story-e6frg996-1226319655691" target="_blank">The Australian</a>, 5 April 2012)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:44:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Court finds telecommunications bundling to be third line forcing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court today made declarations by consent that Clear Telecoms (Aust) Pty Ltd engaged in third line forcing in relation to the sale of bundled deals of telecommunication services and equipment rental agreements to two small businesses in 2008. The 'third line forcing in this matter was the tie between the supply of telecommunication services with call credits and the rental of equipment through a finance company. '.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1044518" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:43:51 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise service agreement between copyright collecting societies</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to allow Viscopy Ltd and Copyright Agency Ltd to enter into a   service agreement under which Copyright Agency will manage and   administer the day-to-day operations of Viscopy’s business'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1044452" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:43:28 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose Pact Group Pty Ltd's proposed acquisition of Viscount Plastics Pty Ltd</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose Pact Group Pty Ltd's proposed acquisition of Viscount Plastics Pty Ltd. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1044469">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1044475" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:43:05 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks comment on proposed variation to fixed line final access determinations</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has commenced a public inquiry into varying the fixed line final access   determinations'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1044345" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/990530" target="_blank">access register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:42:04 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on APA's proposed acquisition of Hastings</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER12+3588.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1042873&amp;trimFileName=MER12+3588.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the APA Group's proposed acquisition of Hastings Diversified Utilities Fund.'  Submissions on the SOI are due by 13 April. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1042882" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022825" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:45:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose Amcor Limited's proposed acquisition of Aperio Group Pty Limited</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In it's press release the ACCC states that it 'considered that if the merged Amcor / Aperio attempted to   increase the price of value-added flexible packaging and/or decrease   service levels, competitors already supplying Australian customers,   along with potential suppliers located overseas, would be able to   attract business and win market share away from the merged firm.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1042123" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1041666" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:44:41 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise corporate alliance between Virgin Australia and Skywest airlines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'issued a draft decision which proposes to grant authorisation to a Corporate Alliance between Virgin Australia and Western Australian carrier, Skywest' which it believes 'will promote competition by enabling Virgin Australia and Skywest to offer   an extensive integrated air service package to corporate customers in   competition with Qantas and its affiliates ...'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1040986" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022673" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:44:10 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose proposed acquisition of HP's PET and plastics assets by Visy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose Visy's proposed acquisition of the PET and plastics assets of HP entities.  These have had receivers and managers appointed. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1040793" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1040669" target="_blank">mergers register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:43:45 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to reauthorise rules to support high value payments</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to grant reauthorisation to the High Value Clearing System (HVCS) Regulations and Procedures, operated by the Australian Payments Clearing Association (APCA).' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1040743" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1019657" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:37:33 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to reauthorise arrangements for WA real estate and business agents</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'issued a draft determination proposing to reauthorise arrangements under which the Real Estate Institute of Western Australia deals with its members and consumers in WA'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1039791" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1016848" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:37:08 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Collective bargaining for independent furniture and bedding retailers </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC proposes to allow independent furniture and bedding retailers to collectively bargain with suppliers. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1039534" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022071" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:36:44 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to review equity takeover of takeover of Intercast &amp; Forge</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is reviewing the completed acquisition of Intercast &amp; Forge, Australia's largest iron foundry and manufacturer of rail castings. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1037537/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>. Submissions due by 26 March. See also Leonie Lamont, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-conducts-post-mortem-into-foundry-takeover-20120313-1uyj9.html" target="_blank">ACCC conducts post mortem into foundry takeover</a>' (SMH, 14 March 2012)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:36:16 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flight Centre accused of price fixing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has instituted proceedings in the Federal Court in Brisbane against Flight Centre Ltd, alleging it attempted to induce competitors to enter into price fixing arrangements. A directions hearing is listed for Friday 13 April 2012 at 9:30am before Justice Logan.  Flight Centre denies the allegation. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1038360/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:35:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Australian Leisure and Hospitality's proposed acquisitions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER12+2382.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1038044&amp;trimFileName=MER12+2382.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1018025" target="_blank">proposed acquisition</a> of 31 hotels and one takeaway packaged liquor licence in New South Wales by Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group Pty Ltd.'  Submissions are due by 22 March 2012 and the ACCC's final decision will be deferred until 5 April 2012.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1038051" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:34:50 +1000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to consult on proposed Foxtel undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC today commenced market consultation on the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=D12+36596.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1037653&amp;trimFileName=D12+36596.pdf" target="_blank">proposed undertaking</a> offered by   Foxtel in respect of its proposed acquisition of Austar. The closing date for submissions is 20 March with a final decision expected by the end of the month. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1037644" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742" target="_blank">merger register</a>. See also Patrick Durkin and John McDuling, <a href="http://afr.com/p/national/accc_flags_lighter_touch_on_mergers_UoUyR4nZFqM472HggDYelK" target="_blank">ACCC Flags Lighter Touch on Mergers</a> (AFR online, 8 March 2012)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:56:06 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims delivers keynote address</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC chairman Rod Sims delivered the keynote address at the inaugural Global Competition Review Law Leaders Asia-Pacific 2012 conference in Singapore. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1036648" target="_blank">View speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:33:16 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective recycling tenders by Hunter councils</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC "proposes to allow Hunter Resource Recovery and its member councils to collectively tender and contract for recycling services." View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1036518" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:32:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Visy's proposed acquisition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a "<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER12+1989.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1036238&amp;trimFileName=MER12+1989.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition by Visy Industries Australia Pty Ltd of the PET and plastics assets of HP entities that have had receivers and managers appointed." Submissions are due by 15 March. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1036207" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1024085" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:31:47 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts Telstra's structural separation undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has accepted <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1003999" target="_blank">Telstra's structural separation undertaking</a> and approved its draft migration plan. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035833" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:14:24 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Homebrew supplier provides RPM undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[&quot;Edwards Essences Pty Ltd, manufacturer and wholesaler of essences for   alcoholic products to homebrew shops nationwide, has acknowledged that   it engaged in resale price maintenance in undertakings provided to the   Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.&quot; In particular, it achnowledged that &quot;it had made known to a distributor on two separate occasions that it   should not sell goods supplied to it by Edwards at a price less than the   recommended retail price specified by Edwards&quot;. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035616" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035499" target="_blank">undertaking</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:14:02 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises capped fees for after-hours medical care in ACT</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has &quot;<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009599" target="_blank">authorised CALMS Ltd</a>, the after-hours locum medical service which   operates in the ACT, to agree and set fee caps for the provision of   after hours primary medical services in the ACT&quot;. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035532" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:13:38 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC declares non-NBN local bitstream access service and begins public inquiry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has delcared the local bitstream access service "intended to cover the ‘last mile’ of fibre to residences and small businesses on networks that are not owned by NBN Co and does not apply to mobile, wireless or satellite networks." View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035309" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:13:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foxtel to allow ISP access in bid for Austar</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Damon Kitney in today's Australian reports on '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/broadcast/foxtels-new-bid-to-secure-accc-nod/story-fna045gd-1226282011187" target="_blank">Foxtel's new bid to secure ACCC nod</a>', noting that Foxtel and Austar have 'agreed to make some of their exclusive content available to internet service providers as part of undertakings' to win ACCC support.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:06 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining in the Victorian tomato industry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will allow members of the Australian Processing Tomato Grower (branch of the Vic Farmers Federation) to collectively bargain on terms and conditions of contracts with purchasers. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035297" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:54:26 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statement of issues on Amcor's bid for Aperio</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/750995" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> on <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1017168" target="_blank">Amcor's bid for Aperio</a>. Submissions due by 8 March; decision deferred until 29 March. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035010" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:54:07 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revised structural separation undertaking from Telstra</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has received a further revised structural separation undertaking from Telstra addressing drafting issues that were of concern to the ACCC. The ACCC will now move to finalise its decision, which it expects to announce shortly. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1034946" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1003999" target="_blank">further revised structural separatoin undertaking and supporting submissions</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:53:40 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims: 'Infrastructure: why, when and how to regulate"</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, spoke at the SMART Facility, University of Wollongong, on the topic of why, when and how to regulate infrastructure. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1035060" target="_blank">View speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:53:20 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC priorities and updated Compliance and Enforcement Policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In conjunction with a speech to the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce (<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1033915" target="_blank">Enduring Perspectives and 2012 Objectives</a>), ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, released an <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/cepolicy/" target="_blank">updated Compliance and Enforcement Policy</a> and outlined priorities for the ACCC. In relation to competitoin policy, Sims highlighted indicated the priority for 2012 would be determining whether there had been breaches in the fuel and supermarket sectors. He also noted the busy year ahead in relation to telecommunications and continued engagement with international regulators. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1033964" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:52:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining by Queensland coal miners</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has &quot;authorised Queensland coal miners to collectively bargain with Dudgeon Point Project Management (DPPM) and QR Network in order to support the miners' coal export programs.&quot; View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1033415" target="_blank"> press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:25:51 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC supports affordable funerals through proposed authorisation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC proposes tore-authorise Retirees WA (Inc) to continue its collective bargaining for   members' access to basic, pre-paid, low cost funerals. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1033380" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:25:26 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC declares wholesale ADSL</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022756" target="_blank">declared</a> the 'wholesale ADSL service under section 152AL of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. The ACCC considers that this will promote the long-term interests of end-users of fixed-line broadband internet services throughout Australia.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1032878" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:25:03 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC invites further comments on NBN Co SAU</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has invited further comment on <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1020185/fromItemId/ACCC" target="_blank">NBN Co's Special Access Undertaking</a>. Submissions are due by 30 March. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1031995" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:24:28 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks comment on Woolworths' proposed liquor off licence acquisition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER12+1274.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1031693&amp;trimFileName=MER12+1274.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition by Woolworths of a takeaway packaged liquor licence in Rocherlea, Tasmania.

The Statement of Issues seeks further information on certain competition issues which have arisen from the ACCC's review to date.

The ACCC invites further submissions from the market in response to the Statement of Issues by 23 February 2012. As a result, the ACCC's final decision will be deferred until 8 March 2012.

View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1031737" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1015558" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:23:15 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Delay for Foxtel Takeover</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Austar is seeking approval to delay the shareholder meeting on its proposed acquisition by Foxtel to allow more time for the ACCC to finish its informal review of the proposal.  See, eg, Sally Jackson, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/austar-legal-bid-to-stall-foxtel-vote/story-e6frg996-1226262288034" target="_blank">Austar legal bid to stall Foxtel vote</a>, (The Australian, 4 February 2012).  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:37:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC: Cartel conduct - how it affects you and your business</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has released a leaflet, &quot;<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1030426" target="_blank">Cartel conduct - how it affects you and your business</a>&quot;</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:37:18 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supermarket wars</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Last year it was milk wars (prompting <a href="reports/2011milk.html">this Senate Inquiry</a>). Now it's fresh fruit price wars and yet again there are claims that too much price competition is anti-competitive and there are calls for competition policy review (please no!) - see, eg, Richard Willingham and Saffron Howden, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/mps-concern-over-supermarket-wars-20120201-1qs1g.html" target="_blank">MPs concern over supermarket wars</a>, (SMH, February 1, 2012) </p>
<p>In addition, Nick <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201202/s3420449.htm" target="_blank">Xenephon</a> wants a federal farming commissioner, apparently influenced by the recent - controversial - decision by the SA to appoint his frequent adviser, Frank Zumbo, the part-time Deputy Small Business Commissioner; see eg Sarah Martin, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/liberals-question-advisers-plum-job/story-e6frgczx-1226258822119" target="_blank">'Liberals question adviser's plum job</a>' (The Australian, 1 Feb 2012)). Watch this space!</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:36:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Turnbull calls for ACCC oversight for NBN Co</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull has again made clear his views on the need for ACCC oversight on NBN Co - see <a href="http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/media/nbn-co-must-not-dodge-accc-oversight/" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:36:02 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC takes Eternal Beauty Products to Court alleging RPM</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has instituted proceedings against Eternal Beauty Products Pty Ltd and its director, alleging they engaged in <a href="law/rpm.html">resale price maintenance</a> &quot;by inducing or attempting to induce two retailers not to sell products online at prices less than those specified by Eternal Beauty.&quot; View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1029553" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:35:29 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval to Virgin and Skywest's corporate alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted interim authorisation for a proposed corporate alliance between Virgin and Skywest, which would including bundling of 'air passenger transport services to corporate customers seeking an integrated suite of charter, domestic and international services.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1028672" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022673/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:22:08 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises collective bargaining for film and television writers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has authorised the Australian Writers' Guild (AWG) to collectively negotiate model terms and conditions of engagement with the Screen Producers Association of Australia (SPAA). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1028659/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1006639" target="_blank"> authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:20:20 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation for continued use of high volume clearance system</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC today 'granted the Australian Payments Clearing Association (APCA) interim authorisation to continue operating certain provisions of its High Value Clearing System (HVCS) Regulations and Procedures.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1028685/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1019657/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:19:45 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Cabcharge's proposed acquisition of Yellow Cabs in Adelaide</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC's informal merger register notes that the &quot;ACCC considered that as Cabcharge, including its subsidiary taxi networks, did not operate any taxi network services in metropolitan Adelaide, the proposed acquisition would result in a direct transfer of market share of affiliated taxis within the Adelaide metropolitan area&quot; and that therefore &quot;the proposed acquisition would be unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the markets for the supply of taxi services, taxi network services and booking and dispatch services to taxis in the Adelaide metropolitan area.&quot;  </p>
<p>In relation to national markets
  for &quot;provision of taxi-specific non-cash payment instruments, non-cash payment processing services for taxis and the supply of taxi equipment to the taxi industry, the ACCC considered that the proposed acquisition was unlikely to substantially raise barriers to entry and therefore was unlikely to substantially lessen competition in these markets. Within the context of the Adelaide metropolitan area, the ACCC considered that there would remain two independent taxi networks, with a substantial share of affiliated taxis, that could be approached by new entrants.&quot; View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1028390/fromItemId/751046" target="_blank">merger register</a>. </p>
<p>John Durie has a related item in the Australian ('<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/sims-in-drivers-seat-on-cabcharge-ruling/story-e6frg9io-1226253835506" target="_blank">Sims in Drivers Seat on Taxi Ruling</a>', The Australian, 26 January 2012) - he discusses the different path being taken by Sims compared with Samuel and also briefly discussses the recent changes to the Act and the issue of creeping acquisitions - worth a quick read if you can get past the Australian's paywall.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:18:40 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backlash on ACCC merger stance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Several recent news items have discussed the ACCC's approach to mergers in light of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011metcash.html">Metcash</a> decision. See, for example, Sid Maher, 'Judge joins backlash against competition watchdog' (The Australian, 10 January 2012). A number of items quote the thoughts of former federal court judge, the Hon Peter Heerey QC, referring to an <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2011heerey-mergers.html">article published him in last month's ABLR</a>. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2011corones-mergers.html">Stephen Corones</a> also has an item in the last ABLR discussing this case and the editors have promised discussion of the Metcash case in the February issue of the ABLR.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:17:35 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AFR: 'ACCC vows to get real on mergers'</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Australian Financial Review (pp 1 and 4) has an article by Patrick Durkin discussing Rod Sims' plan for a more 'pragmatic approach to how it assesses mergers'. Sims states that the ACCC will 'not be taking on theoretical points' but will be making 'proper, commercial assessments'. The item discusses the Metcash deal, the Foxtel/Austar deal, NBN and some other ACCC priorities. Patrick Durkin has another item on page 4 regarding the uncertainty surrounding the legal test for mergers. It includes comments from <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/judges/heerey-peter.html">Peter Heerey QC</a> and <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/poddar-dave.html">Dave Podder</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:40:52 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ticketek penalised for misusing market power</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court in Sydney has penalised Ticketek Pty Ltd $2.5 million for taking advantage of its market power.

'The Court found that on four separate occasions Ticketek engaged in conduct with the anti-competitive purpose of deterring or preventing Lasttix from supplying its services. Lasttix offers promotional services to event organisers to target consumers wanting to buy 'last minute' discounted tickets.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1023878" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/1489.html" target="_blank">decision</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:34:49 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling regulations released for comment</title>
      <link>http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=037&amp;amp;ContentID=2284</link>
      <description><![CDATA[David Bradbury (Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer) has released the <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=037&amp;ContentID=2284" target="_blank">Government's price signalling regulations</a> for consultation. These relate to the price signalling laws introduced by the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Act (No. 1) 2011</a> (to commence 6 June 2012).  The regulations make clear that the law will initially only apply to the banking sector.  Consultation closes on 22 March 2012.  View <a href="http://parlsec.treasurer.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/067.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=djb&amp;Year=&amp;DocType=" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=037&amp;ContentID=2284" target="_blank">consultation draft regulations and explanatory note</a>. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:27:33 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stephen King appointed as Part Time NCC Councillor</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="experts/king-stephen.html">Prof Stephen King</a> has been appointed as a part time Councillor of the <a href="glossary/ncc.html">National Competition Council</a> until 17 December 2012. View <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/065.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=djb&amp;Year=&amp;DocType" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:08:52 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC revokes Football Qld's third line forcing notification </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has issued a notice revoking Football Queensland’s third line forcing   notification which covers a program requiring member clubs to purchase   equipment and apparel only from licensed suppliers.' Football Queensland is the governing body for soccer in Qld. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022623" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/826296" target="_blank">notification register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:08:32 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by Dudgeon Point coal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to authorise miners to collectively bargain with Dudgeon Point   Project Management (DPPM) and QR Network to export coal from Bowen Basin   mines through the proposed DPPM terminal at Dudgeon Point'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022650" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:08:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining in the tomato industry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is 'proposing to allow members of Australian Processing Tomato Growers, a branch of the Victorian Farmers Federation, to bargain collectively on the terms and conditions of their contracts with their processors'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022235" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1005755" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:07:44 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MOA between ACCC and SA Government on cartels</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has signed a MOA with the South Australian State Government on strategies to combat cartel conduct. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022172" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:07:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by AbbotPoint coal miners with QR network</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to allow coal miners to collectively bargain with QR Network   for access to its below rail infrastructure in the Newlands, Blackwater   and Goonyella coal rail systems. Coal from the Bowen Basin mines is to   be exported through the Port of Abbot Point.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1021282" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1007445" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:06:16 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues draft final access determination for regulated transmission service</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'issued a draft final access determination (FAD) for the declared   domestic transmission capacity service (DTCS)'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1021554" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/990533" target="_blank">access determination</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:05:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revised Telstra structural separation undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has received a revised structural separation undertaking from Telstra. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1021453" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1003999" target="_blank">undertaking</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:04:58 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC issues draft final access determination for regulated transmission service</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'issued a draft final access determination (FAD) for the declared   domestic transmission capacity service (DTCS)'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1021554" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/990533" target="_blank">access determination</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:05:48 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by AbbotPoint coal miners with QR network</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to allow coal miners to collectively bargain with QR Network   for access to its below rail infrastructure in the Newlands, Blackwater   and Goonyella coal rail systems. Coal from the Bowen Basin mines is to   be exported through the Port of Abbot Point.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1021282" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1007445" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:06:16 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MOA between ACCC and SA Government on cartels</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has signed a MOA with the South Australian State Government on strategies to combat cartel conduct. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022172" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:07:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining in the tomato industry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is 'proposing to allow members of Australian Processing Tomato Growers, a branch of the Victorian Farmers Federation, to bargain collectively on the terms and conditions of their contracts with their processors'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022235" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1005755" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:07:44 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by Dudgeon Point coal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to authorise miners to collectively bargain with Dudgeon Point   Project Management (DPPM) and QR Network to export coal from Bowen Basin   mines through the proposed DPPM terminal at Dudgeon Point'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022650" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:08:13 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC revokes Football Qld's third line forcing notification </title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has issued a notice revoking Football Queensland’s third line forcing   notification which covers a program requiring member clubs to purchase   equipment and apparel only from licensed suppliers.' Football Queensland is the governing body for soccer in Qld. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1022623" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/826296" target="_blank">notification register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:08:32 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stephen King appointed as Part Time NCC Councillor</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="experts/king-stephen.html">Prof Stephen King</a> has been appointed as a part time Councillor of the <a href="glossary/ncc.html">National Competition Council</a> until 17 December 2012. View <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/065.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=djb&amp;Year=&amp;DocType" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:08:52 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not appeal Metcash</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not seek special leave to appeal against the Full Federal Court's decision in <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011metcash.html" target="_blank">Metcash</a>. Despite the uncertainty brought about by the various separate judgments delivered in Metcash, the ACCC has indicated it 'will continue to assess the likely competitive effect of an acquisition on the basis of a &quot;real chance&quot; test'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1020658" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:34:45 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Arrow Energy's acquisition of Bow Energy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose Arrow Energy's acquisition of Bow Energy. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1020074/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1020016" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:34:01 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Virgin/Singapore Airlines alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authoirsation for Virgin and Singapore Airlines to enter into an integrated network aviation alliance that the ACCC 'considers ... likely to lead to increased competition for international air passenger services'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1019999" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/993958" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:57:50 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC loses Metcash Appeal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011metcash.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court today handed down it's decision in the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011metcash.html">Metcash</a> Appeal. Justices Finn, Buchanan and Yates rejected the ACCC's appeal. <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2011/151.html" target="_blank">View case</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:11:35 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foxtel/Austar decision delayed</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Foxtel has requested an extension fo time to allow it to make a further submission on its proposed acquisition of Austar.  See, eg, Colin Kruger, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-hits-pause-after-foxtel-requests-submission-extension-20111128-1o3bd.html" target="_blank">ACCC hits pause after Foxtel requests submission extension</a> (SMH, 29 November 2011) . See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">ACCC Merger Register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:54:53 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Changes to merger law pass through Senate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Senate has passed the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011ccla.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011</a> without amendment. A <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:%22legislation/amend/r4600_amend_f313986c-5eb8-4107-8e90-851aa5d39abe%22" target="_blank">proposed amendment</a> by Senator Xenophon was negatived.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:03:00 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Pact Group's proposed acquisition of Viscount Plastics</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileTitle=MER11+13058.pdf&amp;trimFileFromVersionId=1018991&amp;trimFileName=MER11+13058.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition by Pact Group Pty Ltd of Viscount Plastics Pty Ltd. Submissions are invited - due 15 December. The final decision is due by 19 January 2012. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1019014" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1010733" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:30:56 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling Bill passes through Senate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Price Signalling Bill (the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a>) passed through the Senate late last night without further debate. The price signalling provisions will commence six months from the date of Royal Assent. The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011ccla.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011</a> (mergers) is listed for debate today.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:35:54 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition bills listed for debate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In the last sitting for the year, the Senate has finally listed the competition law bills for debate - the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a> and the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011ccla.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011</a> are both listed for debate on Thursday (<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/pubs/daily/2011/201111.htm" target="_blank">view Senate &quot;week at a glance&quot;</a>). The first of these bills is the controversial price signalling bill and the second is the 'creeping acquisition' bill, which will remove the word 'substantial' from the definition of market in s 50(6) and replace the words 'a market' with 'any market' in s 50(1). ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:48:31 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Korean Air Lines fined $5.5 million for price fixing</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1018134/fromItemId/2332</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court (Justice Stone) has penalised Korean Air Lines $5.5 (plus $200,000 in costs) for its part in the international air cargo cartel - Korean Air Lines admitted that it reached and gave effect to understandings with other airlines in relation to fuel surcharges, security surcharges and cusoms fees. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1018134/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:36:11 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose CBA's acquisition of Count Financial Ltd</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1018021</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has indicated it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Count Financial Ltd by teh Commonwealth Bank of Australia, noting that while the acquisition would 'increase CBA's presence in the supply of financial planning services and   mortgage referral services', CBA 'would continue to be constrained by a number of other significant   financial planning dealer groups, mortgage broking firms and investment   product providers'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1018021" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1018003" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:01:24 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speaks on access</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1017282</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, delievered a paper this morning to the Western Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry on 'Competition and regulating monopolies: some perspectives from the ACCC'. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1017282" target="_blank"> paper</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1017302" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:11:51 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims talks about competition issues in the top end</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1016174&amp;amp;nodeId=57ca58d57ac12e61cd64e624f8ade30a&amp;amp;fn=Competition and Consumer issues in the top end.pdf</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has delivered a Breakfast Seminar in Darwin on 'Competition and Consumer issues in the top end'. There is, however, very little mention of competition issues - the clear focus was the ACL. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=1016174&amp;nodeId=57ca58d57ac12e61cd64e624f8ade30a&amp;fn=Competition and Consumer issues in the top end.pdf" target="_blank">speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:38:59 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Final Supermarket report presented to Senate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Kroger presented the final report of the Economics Reference Committee on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html">The impacts of supermarket price decisions on the dairy industry</a> to the Senate yesterday (<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/dailys/ds031111.pdf" target="_blank">View Hansard</a> - pages 29-35). </p>
<p>In part, the Report recommends that an independent review of the Competition and Consumer Act be initiated (recommendation 5). This recommendation is not supported by the Government (see Senator Bishop's comments and 'Government Senators' Additional Comments' in the final report). </p>
<p>Additional comments to the report are also made by Senators Xenophon, Williams, Heffernan, Madigan and Milne, recommending - amongst other things - a re-introduction of price signalling laws and general divestiture powers (apparently influenced, in part, by the misconception that we are out of touch with international prctice in this respect).</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:01:22 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cost of Metcash trial</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011metcash.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The cost of the ACCC's attempts to block Metcash's acquisition of Franklins was disclosd in Parliament today in response to Senator Boswell's question (number 1263).  The cost to the ACCC was approximately $3.4million for the trial and between $85-90,000 for the interlocutory application for interim injunction. The ACCC has allocated around $850,000 for the costs of the appeal to the federal court. See <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/dailys/ds021111.pdf" target="_blank">Hansard (last two pages)</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:00:15 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Penalties imposed in TF Wooolam cover pricing case</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Justice Logan hs handed out penalties in the construction industry price fixing case. Corporate penalties total $1.3m with additional penalties for some individuals involved. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1015335" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011woollam.html">original case</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:58:59 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>South Australian newsagents to collectively bargain with SA Lotteries</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will allow the Australian Newsagents' Federation Ltd (ANF) to collectively bargain with SA Lotteries on behalf of 112 of its SA members. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1014608" target="_blank">press relese</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1012160" target="_blank">notification register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:53:10 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coal producers granted interim authorisation for collective negotiations</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted interim authorisation for coal miners to collectively negotiate with Dudgeon Point Project Management Pty Ltd (DPPM) in Queensland.. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1014541" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1010647" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:52:30 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash hearing concludes</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The hearing of the appeal  in <a href="cases/2011metcash.html">Metcash</a> concluded yesterday. Media highlights include: Susannah Moran, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/metcash-slams-accc-appeal-over-takeover-bid/story-fn91v9q3-1226176688259" target="_blank">Metcash slams ACCC appeal over takeover bid</a>' (The Australian, 26 October 2011), ABC Lateline Business, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/business/items/201110/s3348931.htm" target="_blank">ACCC appeals against Franklins takeover</a>' (26 October 2011), Susannah Moran, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/retailer-franklins-wholesale-denial/story-fn91v9q3-1226177707749" target="_blank">Retailer Franklins' Wholesale Denial</a>' (Australian, 27 October 2011)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:41:45 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AFR: New price signalling rules threaten workouts</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.afr.com/p/markets/dealbook/new_price_signalling_rules_threaten_trSdWq9mRMs1Q40ksXSn6O" target="_blank">AFR reports</a> on concerns that proposed price-signalling rules will cause problems for banks trying to support companies in financial distress. This includes concerns expressed by former TPC chairman, <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/baxt-robert.html">Bob Baxt</a> and Corrs partner, Shaun McGushin. The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html" target="_blank">price signalling bill</a> will be debated in the Senate next month.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:40:49 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Chairman to pursue misuse of market power</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Speaking to the Law Institute of Victoria, ACCC Chairman Rod Sims discussed unconscionable conduct and misuse of market power, noting again that the misuse of market power provisions need clarification: &quot;The ACCC now believes that it is time to resolve the unanswered questions surrounding section 46. Recent amendments to the Act and likely future court actions are providing guidance on how to successfully prosecute companies that misuse their market power&quot;.  Sims also apologised for not being a lawyer ... <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=1014098" target="_blank">View speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:48:28 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash begins ... again</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The appeal in <a href="cases/2011metcash.html">Metcash</a> began today in Sydney before Justices 
  Finn, Buchanan and Yates. Media coverage includes: John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/metcash-appeal-will-test-regulators-powers/story-e6frg9io-1226174558930" target="_blank">Metcash appeal will test regulator's power</a>s' (The Australian, 24 October 2011), Michael Evans, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/metcash-ruling-undermines-retail-competition-says-accc-20111024-1mgce.html" target="_blank">Metcash ruling undermines retail competition, says ACCC</a>' (SMH, 25 October 2011) and Susannah Moran, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/judge-erred-on-metcash-ruling/story-fn91v9q3-1226175627834" target="_blank">Judge &quot;erred&quot; on Metcash Ruling</a>' (The Australian, 25 October 2011)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:55:04 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to CALMS fee cap schedule</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The CCC has' granted interim authorisation to the Canberra After-hours Locum Medical Service (CALMS) to continue to apply a 'not to exceed' fee schedule (capped fee arrangement).' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1013562/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009599" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:53:50 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Latest ACC Law News out</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[CCH's latest Australian Competition & Consumer Law News is out  and contains a lengthy note by <a href="http://www.terceiro.com.au/expertise.html" target="_blank">Michael Terceiro</a> on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011metcash.html">Metcash decision</a> ('Messcash: a comedy of errors" (Issue 636, 14 October 2011)) in which he concludes that "claims that Emmett J's judgment represents a triumph of common sense over economic theory are entirely misplaced", predicting it is unlikely to survive appeal. Worth a read for a different perspective; Michael acted for the financial adviser to the Supabarn led consortium. The Issue contains a number of other interesting items, including notes on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011woollam.html">FT Woollam cover pricing case</a> and <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/938.html" target="_blank">ACCC v Prysmian</a>, in which the court held that the identity of a cartel informer was not protected by public interest immunity (at least in this case).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:32:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F4693C51-2437-4C64-B054-B4BF3B61ACAE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims discusses supermarket price wars</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chief, Rod Sims, has discussed the extent of ACCC's powers in relation to the major supermarket chains (amongst other things) at a senate estimates hearing last night. <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2011/s3343868.htm" target="_blank">View report by Naomi Woodley</a> on ABC radio (awaiting transcript).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:29:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8F945624-1DB6-47F4-946D-DC6051B5195C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZ Introduces Criminal Cartel Bill</title>
      <link>http://feeds.beehive.govt.nz/release/bill-introduced-deter-hard-core-cartel-behaviour</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Yesterday NZ's criminal cartel billl was introduced into Parliament. It allows for a maximum jail term for individuals of 7 years imprisonment. View <a href="http://feeds.beehive.govt.nz/release/bill-introduced-deter-hard-core-cartel-behaviour" target="_blank">press release and background documents</a>. View <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2011/0341/latest/096be8ed807b0cad.pdf" target="_blank">bill</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:57:34 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise Virgin Australia and Singapore Airlines alliance</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1012373</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has &quot;issued a draft decision proposing to grant authorisation for Virgin Australia and Singapore Airlines to enter into an integrated network aviation alliance.
  
  Under the alliance, the airlines will cooperate on all aspects of their Australia - Singapore services and any international and domestic connecting routes, including joint pricing and scheduling and joint marketing and sales.&quot; View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1012373" target="_blank">press release</a>.. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/993958" target="_blank">draft authorisation</a>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:22:42 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims speaks to Melbourne Press Club: "Some Perspectives on Competition and Regulation"</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In his first address to the Melbourne Press Club, Rod Sims noted that the vertical integration in supermarket supply chains requires 'close scrutiny to ensure the supermarkets do not misuse their market power under Sector 46.' Airports and telecommunications also featured in his address, as does <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/hilmer-fred.html">Fred Hilmer</a>'s recent criticisms of Australia's current approach to competition policy. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1011816" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1011797/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:06:12 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NSW and ACT newsagents to collectively bargain with NSW Lotteries</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will allow 'the Newsagents Association of NSW and ACT (NANA) to collectively bargain with NSW Lotteries on behalf of member newsagents.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1011095" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1000849" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:34:56 +1100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows collective bargaining for remote community stores</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has approved a collective bargaining notification which will allow &quot;a group of community stores in the remote Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands in the far northwest of South Australia&quot; to &quot;negotiate terms and conditions with suppliers of essential grocery and supermarket items.&quot; View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1010649" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:34:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BC1BDA28-E0BE-4B0B-A277-BBD028F01FBD</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUROPE: European Court of Justice rules against Premier League</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ECJ has ruled that &quot;a system of exclusive licences is ... contrary to European Union competition law if the licence agreements prohibit the supply of decoder cards to television viewers who wish to watch the broadcasts outside the Member State for which the licence is granted&quot;. View Court of Justice <a href="http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-10/cp110102en.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=EN&amp;Submit=rechercher&amp;numaff=C-403/08" target="_blank">full judgment</a>. See also press: Katy Dowell '<a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/premier-league-dla-piper-defeated-at-ecj-in-key-broadcast-rights-ruling/1009644.article" target="_blank">Premier League, DLA Piper defeated at ECJ in key broadcast rights ruling</a>' (The Lawyer, 4 October 2011) and Simon Taylor, &quot;<a href="http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2011/october/premier-league-loses-tv-court-battle/72179.aspx" target="_blank">Premier League loses TV court battle</a>&quot; (EuropeanVoice.com, 4 October 2011)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:34:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3AD162F2-7935-44C7-8FA9-324E75ABFBF3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash takes over Franklins</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Metcash yesterday completed its deal to acquire Franklins. This follows a <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011metcash.html">failed attempt by the ACCC to block the acquisition</a> ahead of next month's Full Court appeal. View <a href="http://www.metcash.com/files/dmfile/2011.09.30MetcashCompletesFranklinsAcquisition.pdf" target="_blank">Metcash press release</a>. See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/metcash-takes-helm-at-franklins/story-fn91vdzj-1226154424388" target="_blank">Metcash takes helm at Franklins</a>' (The Australian, 1 October 2011) and Elizabeth Sexton, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/metcash-seals-franklins-deal-despite-appeal-20110930-1l1cj.html" target="_blank">Metcash seals Franklins deal despite appeal</a>' (SMH, 1 October 2011).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:26:38 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2BDE9CB-A7FF-430D-B94F-966AD140AB6A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN Co seeks further comments on draft Wholesale Broadband agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In response to concerns by the ACCC over access to NBN Co services for third parties, <a href="http://www.nbnco.com.au/index.html" target="_blank">NBN Co</a> is seeking further comments on its revised draft Wholesale Broadband Agreement. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1010026/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also media coverage: eg, Lucy Battersby, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/nbn-co-in-fourth-consultation-round-20110930-1l1iq.html" target="_blank">NBN Co in fourth consultation round</a>' (SMH, 1 Oct 2011), Annabel Hepworth and Mitchell Bingemann, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/nbn-to-strike-accc-deal/story-fn59niix-1226153866189" target="_blank">NBN to strike ACCC deal</a>' (The Australian, 30 Sept 2011)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:26:09 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18B69901-092F-4098-A0A9-0F2B9E50E996</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves Melbourne Port Terminal wheat export access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has accepted an undertaking from Australian Bulk Alliance Pty Ltd which sets out arrangements for wheat exporters using Melbourne Port Terminal.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009853/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/964331" target="_blank">ABA access undertakings</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:25:47 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7242EFB8-0460-4F4A-8393-CB3EAC536300</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves SA wheat export access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has accepted an undertaking from Viterra allowing wheat exporters to access Viterra’s six ports in South Australia.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009849/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/868800" target="_blank">Viterra access undertakings</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:24:53 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">FBF6CCE0-35DB-4BC1-8265-B01D7722B61E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves WA wheat export access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'has accepted an undertaking from Co-operative Bulk Handling allowing Western Australian wheat exporters access to CBH’s ports at Kwinana, Geraldton, Albany and Esperance'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009847/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/868802" target="_blank">CBH access undertakings</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:24:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2E26C07E-F3A4-437A-AAB0-69803438C845</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Qantas/American Airlines Joint Business Agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'granted authorisation for a Joint Business Agreement (JBA) between Qantas and American Airlines'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009786/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/987619" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:23:59 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C9C43BC2-3913-4A0A-807E-E4E1302201AB</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose SABMiller's acquisition of Fosters</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Foster’s Group by SABMiller plc, after concluding that the acquisition is not likely to substantially lessen competition in the Australian market for the supply of bulk and packaged beer. '. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009575/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1009573" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:23:39 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C87139D2-528A-457D-ADDE-C71EBF9AE9DE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fisse on the price signalling bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a> has produced an annotated critique .org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011</a> entitled '<a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/images/Fisse_Misleading_deceptive_and_bankrupt.pdf" target="_blank">Misleading, Deceptive and Bankrupt: The Second Reading Speech on the Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011</a>'. It is available from the <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/publications.html" target="_blank">publications section of his website</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:15:59 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BE40EFB2-73B4-43EF-A45B-136FCACD5665</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims:  Is competition a myth?</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1008823</link>
      <description>ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, today delivered a speech to the Australian Economic Forum in Sydney, entitled 'Is competition a myth?'. He made three broad observations: (1) "... competition is not a myth in the sense that Australia has achieved a great deal since 1974 ..."; (2) "while much has been achieved, more needs to be done" (in this he agreed with recent comments made by Fred Hilmer) and (3) "where competition is clearly a myth, especially in the areas of infrastructure provision where there are monopoly providers, economic regulation is the complement to competition. ..."</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:31:29 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">210466AA-444C-43BF-9490-8A06302B54F9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate debate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The competition bills were not debated yesterday as originally scheduled - they are also not listed in today's Order of Business. It seems the Senate may be pre-occupied with other matters.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:00:15 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A14A4158-FB37-42A5-84F4-DC279884FC94</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate to debate competition bills</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There are two competition bills listed for debate in the Senate today. The first, and most controversial, is the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html" target="_blank">government's price signalling bill</a>. The second relates to mergers and, in particular, the definition of market (the so-called <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011ccla.html" target="_blank">'creeping acquisition' bill</a>).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:25:13 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C63C0906-164E-439B-8DEB-3FC35BB83D0C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Court denies ACCC Metcash injunction</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Justice Peter Jacobson has rejected an application by the ACCC for an injunction to prevent Metcash's proposed acquisition of Franklins pending an appeal to the Full Federal Court (to be heard over three days, <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1008221" target="_blank">beginning 24 October</a>). <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/1079.html" target="_blank">View judgment</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:24:41 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2AAD14CC-AA33-42EA-92FF-0C3E23D4179B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks interim injunction against Metcash</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1007365</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On 13 September the ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1007365" target="_blank">applied to the Federal Court for an interim injunction</a> restraining the proposed acquisition by Metcash of the Franklins supermarket business.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:50:24 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F68BB908-D27F-4DC1-AEE0-92A99C19890C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Appeals Metcash!</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC today announced it will appeal against the Federal Court's judgment dismissing the ACCC's application to block Metcash's acquisition of Franklins. Rod Sims gave two reasons for the appeal: "First, because of the adverse effect of the proposed acquisition on independent supermarket retailers, consumers and competition in the NSW and ACT grocery sector. ... Second ... because, if left unchallenged, the Court’s interpretation of some fundamental principles of merger analysis could have serious implications for the ACCC’s ability to block anti-competitive mergers and so protect consumers in the future". View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1006791" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:32:43 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63536E42-265C-4500-9A7E-F95F394C4CFE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Conversation: Will Rod Sims' tougher approach pay off for the ACCC?</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/opinions/beaton-wells-2011-sims.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Assoc Prof Caron Beaton-Wells has a new item in <a href="http://theconversation.edu.au/will-rod-sims-tougher-approach-pay-off-for-the-accc-3173" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> discussing the recent <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1004650/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">speech given by Rod Sims</a> at the annual LCA workshop. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/opinions/beaton-wells-2011-sims.html">View article</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:51:21 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">194F7CE4-2C1F-4000-9D04-3849BAB93130</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Telstra' structural separation undertaking</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued 'a discussion paper inviting comment from industry stakeholders and consumers in relation to Telstra’s structural separation undertaking and draft migration plan. The ACCC’s preliminary view is that Telstra’s undertaking can not be accepted in its current form and that important changes are required.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1005037/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1003999" target="_blank">discusion paper</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:51:43 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">641A272E-A85C-4B24-90AC-5A897C724673</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims' speech to LCA</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1004650/fromItemId/8973</link>
      <description><![CDATA[New ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has delivered his first major address at the annual Law Council Workshop: "ACCC: Future Directions". <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1004650/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">View speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:06:42 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B55E4B06-D0AC-4C96-94D7-3C25B65F30EF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bradbury's opening address to LCA workshop</title>
      <link>http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/015.htm&amp;pageID=005&amp;min=djb&amp;Year=&amp;DocType</link>
      <description><![CDATA[David Bradbury MP delivered the opening address to the Law Council of Australia Competition and Consumer Workshop, entitled '<a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/015.htm&pageID=005&min=djb&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">Developments in Competition Policy</a>'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:36:09 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56EF5CA5-3F50-47D9-B5E6-76A7EFA3BFFA</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash decision out</title>
      <link>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/967.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The full reasons of Justice Emmett in ACCC v Metcash [2011] FCA 967 were released today and can be <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/967.html" target="_blank">downloaded from AustLII</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:57:49 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2BCF3664-4EA8-436C-8628-5460EDD9F3AC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC media release on Metcash</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1004365</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1004365" target="_blank">media release</a> expressing its disappointment at Justice Emmett's decision today. It reiterates concerns that 'the proposed acquisition is likely to result in a substantial lessening  of competition through the removal of Metcash's closest and only genuine competitor for the wholesale supply of packaged groceries in NSW' (a market definition not accepted by Justice Emmett). Following public release of full reasons for judgment tomorrow the ACCC will 'examine the judgment and consider its options'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:10:54 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63E9459F-EC8A-49E3-94E8-79F2114C018C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Emmett finds for Metcash</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>Justice Emmett handed down his much anticipated decision in the ACCC v Metcash merger case, finding in favour of Metcash. Detailed reasons will be released tomorrow, but they will include findings that the acquisition "On the other hand, I consider that it is quite likely that the    acquisition of Franklins by Metcash will strengthen the</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:39:55 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5FED5CD3-A269-4886-991A-0AF0D438A1AD</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC wins cartel case</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Justice Logan has found for the ACCC in <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/973.html" target="_blank">ACCC v TF Woollam & Son Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 973</a>, finding that TF Woollm & Son and others engaged in price fixing, in contravention of s 45 of the TPA (as it was at the relevant time) when tendering for government public works projects.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:07:05 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BB4A8366-F8EA-44F1-8A7C-936A7AFE8178</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Second Annual Baxt Lecture on Competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The second annual Baxt Lecture was held today at the Melbourne Law School. It featured Prof Richard Whish as guest speaker, who addressed those present on: "Private Enforcement of Competition? European Developments". The slides (and possibly audio) from the lecture will be available from the web site in due course and I commend them to anyone interested in this area.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:44:24 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24AB37F3-1B16-4E34-9F16-B167F60D4F64</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Mansfield appointed as President of Australian Competition Tribunal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/judges/mansfield-john.html">Justice Mansfield</a> has been appointed as President of the Australian Competition Tribunal and Dr Darryn Abraham and Professor Kevin Davis have been appointed as members, each for five years. View <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/036.htm&pageID=003&min=djb&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:31:15 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E465D0CE-3E30-41B3-9EC6-A5FEA8F99397</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise Qantas/AA Joint Business Agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/987619/display/acccDecision" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation for a Joint Business Agreement between Qantas and American Airlines. This follows an earlier grant of<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/991737" target="_blank"> interim authorisation</a> on 9 June.  Submissions on the draft determination are due by View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1003670" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:30:51 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D40CB09D-77E8-4278-9D54-6ACAF51BC900</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New price signalling paper from Brent Fisse</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Brent Fisse has written a new paper on the current price signalling bill, expected to be debated in the Senate this week. The working draft is titled: '<a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/images/Fisse_OCOB_s_44ZZW(c)_240811.pdf" target="_blank">'Private disclosure of price-related information to a competitor "in the ordinary course of business": A new slippery dip in the political playground of Australian competition law'</a> and is available from the <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/publications.html" target="_blank">publication page of Brent Fisse's website</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:28:30 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4F7F2620-4EC8-422D-97A3-3B2605D950DF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling bill introduced into Senate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011</a> was introduced into to the Senate today and read a first time. The second reading was moved and debate adjourned.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:10 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D6C14961-D9A1-40D9-8A2E-56D15923900F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creeping Acquisition/Unconscionable conduct bill introduced into Senate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011ccla.html">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011</a> was also introduced and read a first time. The second reading was moved and debate adjourned. It's worth reading <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/reps/dailys/dr170811.pdf" target="_blank">Hansard</a> for Craig Kelly's rant on why the word 'substantially' should be removed from the phrase 'substantial lessening of competition' in s 50 - to prohibit all mergers that lessen competition in any way. This makes more sense when you understand that Craig Kelly has been <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/competition-debate/story-fn558imw-1225892975998" target="_blank">'assisted' by Frank Zumbo</a> in relation to competition policy - author of the infamous <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fs721%22" target="_blank">Blacktown</a>, <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2009richmond.html" target="_blank">Richmond</a> and <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2007tpla.html" target="_blank">Birdsville</a> amendments (fortunately only the latter got up, although it would have been better had it not).
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:52:45 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8385AC4A-ED03-439D-8AE7-DD537E65F633</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling bill transmitted to Senate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The House has now transmitted the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011</a> to the Senate for concurrence.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:52:08 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1D8BCF7E-7413-4B0B-BEBB-5DD76170B52A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court approves Visy/Amcor cartel settlement</title>
      <link>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/671.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court (Justice Jacobson) has approved (on 15 June 2011) a settlement deed relating to the Amcor/Visy cartel. Para 9 of the judgments reads: "The  parties to the proceeding, and Jarra Creek’s solicitors, Maurice   Blackburn  Pty Limited (“MBC”), entered into  a Class Action Settlement Deed  dated 10 March 2011 under which the parties agreed to settle the   proceeding for  a total payment of  $120 million. That amount is comprised of $95 million, which  is described as the Distribution Sum, and $25 million payable to MBC  for legal  costs and disbursements." View case at AustLII <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/671.html" target="_blank">(Jarra Creek Central Packing Shed Pty td v Amcor Limited [2011] FCA 671</a>). View <a href="www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/amcorvisysettlement" target="_blank">Amcor/Visy settlement website</a>. View <a href="https://amcorvisysettlement.mauriceblackburn.com.au/Resources/11.03.10%20Settlement%20Deed.PDF" target="_blank">settlement deed</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:56:23 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4EBE0206-29F6-47B7-8C72-CE56A47C56A4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose proposed acquisition of P&amp;N by Asahi</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[he ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of P&N Beverages Australia Pty Ltd by Asahi Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd  <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1002254" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1002216" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:07:18 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">484E5E16-742B-4FE5-90C8-B620086316D2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC draft decision on arrangements for wheat exporters at Viterra's SA ports</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA['The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/868800" target="_blank">draft decision on arrangements for wheat exporters at Viterra’s six wheat export ports in South Australia</a>. The preliminary view is that the introduction of an auction system would address the ACCC’s main areas of concern.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1002230" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:07:14 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">035C07B7-A87F-4557-942F-927697FF8CC7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC draft view on wheat export arrangements at Melbourne Port Terminal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/964331" target="_blank">draft decision on the access undertaking proposed by Australian Bulk Alliance</a> (ABA). The ACCC's view is that 'the overall approach of ABA’s proposed undertaking is likely to be appropriate' but that improvements should be made ins ome areas. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1002215" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:06:53 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C71030E4-178E-4374-9D08-6E755EE7AD77</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AquaDepot Imports admit RPM</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA['Graeme Faulkner and Philip Wu, trading as AquaDepot Imports, admitted engaging in resale price maintenance by ceasing to supply an online retailer who discounted aquarium products below a specified price.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1001845" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1000630" target="_blank">register record</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:47:56 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5774FD72-3F94-41D6-B3AE-08AB48775FC8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC extends dairy farmer collective bargaining arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has extended the exemption allowing dairy farmers to collectively bargain with processors for a further 10 years.  "The ACCC considers collective bargaining by dairy farmers has the potential to deliver better access to information and resources as well as improved input into contract negotiations."  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1001176" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:36:22 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20FCFFFE-01E1-4781-9771-B3847A7F6B29</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Publication: Cartel conduct - how it affects you and your business</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC have released a new publication (on 1 August), '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1000474" target="_blank">Cartel conduct - how it affects you and your business</a>'. It is two pages long and provides a brief overview of the prohibitions, sanctions and tips on avoiding cartel conduct. It also outlines the ACCC's immunity policy for cartel participants.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:47:30 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E4ACADA3-B1C1-4427-867C-8982AD404E0F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose investments in a new credit reporting agency by major Australian lenders</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA["The ACCC will not oppose six financial institutions (ANZ, CBA, Citigroup, GE Capital, NAB and Westpac) each taking a 4 per cent shareholding in a new credit reporting agency, Experian Australia Credit Services. " View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1000979" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1000943" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:46:54 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D566A7CA-05AC-4C12-982A-E63D917A1539</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC receives Telsta's structural separation undertaking and draft migration plan</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has received a   structural separation undertaking and a draft migration plan from   Telstra. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1000404" target="_blank"> press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1000381" target="_blank">undertaking and related structural separation documents</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:46:26 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2E9E835-5BE3-4603-B840-43B6DE8A705C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rod Sims takes over as ACCC boss</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Rod Sims officially takes over as ACCC Chairman today, succeeding Graeme Samuel. Sims is the third ACCC Chairman and the sixth Chairman since the establishment of the Trade Practices Commission (the pre-decessor to the ACCC) in 1965. His first major task will be dealing with the proposed merger of Foxtel and Austar following the ACCC's release of a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=998733&nodeId=42186e6c27337ea6b5f4cfe884a51426&fn=Foxtel%20proposed%20acquisition%20of%20Austar%20United%20Communications%20Limited%20-%2022%20July%202011.pdf" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on 22 July.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:07:27 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">EFA8B908-F7E2-465F-A0E3-BF74332B693B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debate over Samuel's new role</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                Several news items in today's papers discuss the desirability (or otherwise) of outgoing ACCC Chairman taking on a role with investment bank, Greenhill Caliburn. See, for example, John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/samuel-should-take-some-time-off-before-taking-up-new-appointment/story-e6frg9io-1226104578976" target="_blank">Samuel should take some time off before taking up new appointment</a>' (The Australian, 30 July 2011), Tim Borehman and John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/graeme-samuel-sparks-debate-over-new-role-at-greenhill-caliburn/story-e6frg8zx-1226104572125" target="_blank">Graeme Samuel sparks debate over new role at Greenhill Caliburn</a>' (The Australian, 30 July 2011), John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/graeme-samuel-take-gardening-leave-before-starting-greenhill-caliburn-job/story-e6frg9io-1226104235790" target="_blank">Graeme Samuel, take gardening leave before starting Greenhill Caliburn job</a>'  (The Australian, 29 July 2011), John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/accc-chief-graeme-samuel-joins-greenhill-caliburn/story-fn91wd6x-1226104016160" target="_blank">Bob Baxt calls for quarantine on regulators to prevent conflict of interest</a>'  (The Australian, 29 July 2011). There are even some items not penned by John Durie, including: Eric Johnston, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/accc-chiefs-new-job-draws-flak-20110729-1i368.html" target="_blank">ACCC chief's new job draws flak</a>' (SMH, 29 July 2011) and '<a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/entrepreneur-watch/20110729-the-graeme-samuel-puzzle.html" target="_blank">The Graeme Samuel Puzzle</a>' (SmartCompany, 29 July 2011)
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:08:03 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8CA046A7-911B-4E56-A5B9-EE3FD79A6D29</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AFR: The High Price of Public Office</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There is a <a href="http://afr.com/p/the_high_price_of_public_office_LorDdY9wurErTGvL9TidIP" target="_blank">feature item in today's Australian <em>Financial Review Magazine</em></a> discussing Graeme Samuel's term as ACCC Chairman, which comes to an end on Sunday. The AFR <a href="http://afr.com/p/markets/dealbook/samuel_moves_to_greenhill_caliburn_NY9F9kgsJhOXwRXtVyR9OM" target="_blank">also reports</a> that Graeme Samuel will become a director and head of the Melbourne office of the investment bank Greenhill Caliburn.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:24:51 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CE36A381-76EB-4BD3-9AB7-556D5F41381F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Australian: "Solid Legacy of ACCC chief"</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There's another <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/solid-legacy-of-accc-chief/story-e6frg71x-1226102997827" target="_blank">item in the Australian today</a> discussing Graeme Samuel's term as ACCC Chairman. It claims some missteps (Samuel's push for price signalling bans on banking chiefs and his readiness to accept 'the wholesale monopoly' of the NBN), highlights some controversy (including the claims of conflict of interest regarding the DFO and the ACCC's pursuit of Richard Pratt) but concludes that overall 'Mr Samuel's energy and focus have resulted in an expansion of the size and the powers of the ACCC, which has also developed a clearer pro-market approach than it had under his predecessor, Alan Fels'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:48:00 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9A50E458-2E11-4F47-A9F0-19AB419C6563</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dairy dissatisfaction</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Dairy farmers have been expressing dissatisfactiona t the ACCC's recent announcement that it did not consider that Coles had contravened the CCA's prohibition on predatory pricing. Although the attacks are directed toward Samuel and the ACCC, focus seems to be on the loss alleged to have been suffered by small retailers and some farmers, rather than any actual contravention of the law by Coles. See Colin Bettles, '<a href="http://sl.farmonline.com.au/news/nationalrural/dairy/general/dairy-dissatisfaction/2239236.aspx" target="_blank">Dairy dissatisfaction</a>', Stock and Land, 28 July 2011.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:47:31 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">EF28C17E-65CE-4546-87B2-407713FE4CD0</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise management services agreement for private heath fund</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/986430/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation for 10 years to the Reserve Bank Health Society (RBHS) and allow another private health fund, Lysaght Peoplecare Limited, to provide RBHS with advice on operational matters under a management services agreement. ' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/999736" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:47:16 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A7C42D82-6A63-4380-9F2D-3E743CFA54ED</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Graeme Samuel on Lateline</title>
      <link>http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3278691.htm</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                <p>Outgoing ACCC Chief, Graeme Samuel, appeared on Lateline last night.  In response to questions about media and public interest tests for mergers he replied, in part"</p>
<blockquote>
  <p> "the ACCC's concern is about competition. Once we get into public interest, we get into social and potentially political debates which is outside the remit of the ACCC, as is diversity, I might say. </p>
  <p>We're dealing with competition, and competition in itself more often than not, in almost every occasion, serves the public interest very well. You don't need public interest tests necessarily if you've got a truly competitive market because a truly competitive market is one where consumers are empowered to set their demands in place, and suppliers have to meet those demands.". </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Samuel also responded to questiosn about the NBN, the prosecution of Richard Pratt, DFO and the NAB-AXA deal and the relationship of business with government. <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3278691.htm" target="_blank">View Transcript</a>.</p>
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:43:02 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8D8ED10F-D02A-4C07-A2CF-92BB1EB8057D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bradbury certifies South Australian Rail Access Regime</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, David Bradbury MP, has certified the South Australian Access Regime (SARAR) as an 'effective access regime' for a period of 10 years. View <a href="http://www.treasurer.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/033.htm&pageID=003&min=djb&Year=&DocType=0" target="_blank">media release</a>. View <a href="http://www.ncc.gov.au/index.php/application/application_for_certification_of_the_south_australian_rail_access_regime" target="_blank">application, recommendations and decision</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:33:45 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66A22950-D0B3-4025-8B2C-4B14144F2FAF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should price discrimination be illegal?</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Neat little <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=7806" target="_blank">blog piece by Stephen King</a> noting the core problem with price discrimination laws.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:30:04 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93E14C05-73DE-4EC2-9A26-1DFF8BF36C7E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles milk pricing is not predatory: ACCC</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC announced today that it considers there is no evidence that Coles has acted in breach of the CCA.   According to the press release, "ACCC enquiries have revealed evidence that Coles' purpose in reducing the price of its house brand milk was to increase its market share by taking sales from its supermarket competitors including Woolworths.  This is consistent with what the ACCC would expect to find in a competitive market."  The ACCC further noted that, while it did "not usually comment on individual matters that it may or may not be investigating" the significant public interest surrounding this issue meant it was "appropriate to provide ... general comments on its findings." <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/998776/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">View press release</a>. See also the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html">Senate's milk inquiry</a>, which is ongoing (final report expected in October).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:11:58 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C8641232-DC41-409D-84E3-BEA3E311C075</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on FOXTEL's proposed acquisition of AUSTAR</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/998738/fromItemId/142</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742">Statement of Issue</a>s on the proposed acquisition by FOXTEL Management Pty Limited of AUSTAR United Communications Limited.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/998738/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:11:31 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F442B8AC-C07A-4E21-9D63-334690FDA147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC conditionally authorises Qld fly ash agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued its final authorisation determination in relation to a fly ash supply agreement between Pozzolanic Enterprises, Stanwell Corp and Tarong North Pty Ltd. It has conditionally authorised the agreement until 1 March 2014. The agreement will provide Pozzolanic with first right of access to the 'majority of fly ash produced at Tarong and Tarong North Power Stations in south-east Queensland'. Although the ACCC considered the original agreement unnecessarily restrictive, conditional authorisation was given, which requires the agreement to be amended to provide greater certainty in relation to third party access to fly ash. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/997206" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/961019" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:35:55 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1658DDF1-08D0-4A5E-9896-CB414FC1C83B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZ: Rival bidder emerges for authorised merger</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It has just been reported that a rival bidder for NZ Wool Services International <em>(whose acquisition by Cavalier was authorised by the NZCC and is now subject to a HC challenge by Godfrey Hirst) </em>has emerged - Wool Equities. See '<a href="Rival bid for Wool Services Intl" target="_blank">Rival bid for Wool Services Intl</a>' (TVNZ, 11 July 2011) and '<a href="http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/wool-equities-bid-wool-services-db-96921" target="_blank">Wool Equities to bid for Wool Services</a>' (The National Business Review, 11 July 2011)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:17:25 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">70FEEB4F-A249-4D3B-9F14-32490DA766FC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZ: Godfrey Hirst wins High Court stay on WSI sale to Cavalier</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[n 6 July I posted that the NZCC authorised a merger for the first time in a decade between Cavalier Wool Holdings and NZ Wool Services International. A customer has challenged the authorisation and the appeal against the merger is scheduled to be heard in the High Court in the week beginning 22 August. See '<a href="http://www.sharechat.co.nz/article/24599876/hirst-wins-high-court-stay-on-wsi-sale-to-cavalier.html" target="_blank">Hirst wins High Court stay on WSI sale to Cavalier</a>' (Sharechat.co.nz, 8 July 2011) and '<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/new-zealand/news/article.cfm?l_id=71&objectid=10737326" target="_blank">Stay on sale to Cavalier</a>' (nzherald.co.au, 9 July 2011).  <a href="http://www.comcom.govt.nz/assets/Business-Competition/Mergers-and-Acqusitions/Wool-authorisation/Decision-no-725-Cavalier-Wool-Holdings-9-June-2011.pdf" target="_blank">View authorisation decision</a> (PDF) or <a href="http://www.comcom.govt.nz/cavalier-wool-holdings-limited-new-zealand-wool-services-international-limited/" target="_blank">full authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:55:01 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">DC76207F-A7AC-47B8-83CA-2153A95C515A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling bill on 'lunatic' fringe of international competition law</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a> has described the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a>, which was passed by the House of Representatives yesterday, as 'on the lunatic fringe of international competition laws', as 'other-worldly' and as 'pop legislation that serves little or no useful purpose'. He observed that the various amendments negotiated in the last couple of days, including an exception for information disclosure in the 'ordinary course of business', 'does not cure the fundamental failure of the Bill to address concerted practices by competitors in all sectors of the economy'. View <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/news.html" target="_blank">Brent Fisse's news page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:04:18 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B3008586-11E7-4574-9F90-30CC22434DA6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling bill passes House</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Following amendments, brought about by negotiation with the opposition over their proposed amendments, the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a> has passed through the House. It remains an appalling piece of legislation, but unfortunately it is unlikely to find much resistance in the Senate.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:03:27 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2B052EA0-909E-4CEB-8E82-DAB80E2F98A5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZCC authorises merger</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The New Zealand Commerce Commission has authorised a merger for the first time in a decade, despite the fact that the the proposed acquisition by Cavalier Wool Holding's of the wool scouring assets NZ Wool Services International will result in Cavalier Wool being the only wool scourer in NZ. The Commission found that 'there are likely to be considerable cost savings from the rationalisation of the wool scouring industry that Cavalier Wool proposes to carry out. The rationalisation is likely to lead to lower production and administration costs, the freeing up of industrial sites, lower ongoing capital expenditure and improvements to wool handling'. View <a href="http://www.comcom.govt.nz/authorisations-register/detail/716" target="_blank">mergers register</a>. It may be New Zealand news, and it may be a little old (authorisation occurred on 9 June), but it's a welcome break from price signalling ...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:02:28 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5F55331A-2E06-414B-B609-FBDA19877D79</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inquiry into national competition policy on cards</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Peter Martin reports in the Age today - <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/all-is-not-fair-in-supermarkets-share-20110705-1h0q1.html" target="_blank">All is not fair in supermarkets' share</a> - that a 'coalition of Greens, an independent and a Liberal believe they are in striking distance of forcing a inquiry into <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/ncp.html">national competition policy</a>'. Martin reports that Christine Milne (Greens), Xenophon (independent) and Kelly (Liberal) endorsed a report by former Greens Senator Dee Margetts which blames the policy for supermarket dominance. The abolition of s 49 (price signalling) is also blamed for a lot of problems (mind-boggling though that accusation may be).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:01:28 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53CAFB56-4B96-4E90-9453-2F0C134C0652</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banks see red on price signalling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There is an item in the Age today by Clancy Yeates - <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/banks-see-red-on-signalling-20110705-1h0pm.html" target="_blank">Banks See Red on Signalling</a> - despite the obvious self-interest of the ABA, they certainly have a point in relation to the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 04:00:56 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6888ED02-7372-45D5-BC01-332334CD4226</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling continued ...</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Mr Billson, for the opposition, has <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr4548_amend_31e0ee46-7720-4747-adce-47c5ead43812%22" target="_blank">proposed an amendment</a> to the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">government's price signalling bill</a>. This is in addition to a <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr4548_amend_c261e764-1a27-4d44-a3b4-4ffcb7ef1561%22" target="_blank">proposed amendment from Mr Bandt</a> for the Greens (although that amendment does not relate to price signalling, but rather seeks to prohibit the big banks from acquiring any more smaller banks). Debate has adjourned while amendments are considered.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:09:58 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ABB00C6-DF41-445F-8B84-BC5634DFB537</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fancy a hot tub?</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                The University of Melbourne's <a href="http://clen.law.unimelb.edu.au/" target="_blank">Competition Law & Economics Network (CLEN)</a> has released of a video demonstrating Australia’s approach to expert evidence in competition law cases - a mock 'hot tub', based on the facts in <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/boral.html">Boral</a> and presided over by retired <span lang="en" xml:lang="en">the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/judges/heerey-peter.html">Hon Peter   Heerey QC</a></span> who was the first instance judge in that case.  In addition to the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/judges/heerey-peter.html">Hon Peter Heerey QC</a>, the expert roles were played by <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/williams-philip.html">Dr Philip Williams</a> (for the ACCC)   and Richard York (for Boral) and counsel were played by <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/shavin-david.html">David Shavin QC</a> (who acted   for the ACCC in the Boral case) and Jack Fajgenbaum QC. Certainly an impressive line up - well worth a look. The video can be <a href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2400DB4E81C32C45" target="_blank">viewed on YouTube</a> in three parts.
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:09:18 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87AC81CD-9751-4711-BCB9-660FD4BEB135</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brief debate on price signalling bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a> was debated in the House briefly yesterday (with Mr Billson continuing his speech) but it lasted for about 5 minutes before being adjourned yet again. My <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html" target="_blank">legislation page for this bill</a> includes extracts from Mr Billson'ns speech]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:08:42 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8055DB95-D679-4BFC-A89F-80D32CF68E21</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling bill to be debated</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a> is listed for resumption of second reading debate today and for third reading in the House.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:07:33 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11E385FE-3C89-446D-9125-ABD9437C72D9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC revokes CBH's exclusive dealing notification</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/994735</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has revoked Co-operative Bulk Handling Ltd's (CBH) exclusive dealing notification which allowed CBH to 'require Western Australian grain growers and marketers who use its 'up-country' storage facilities to also use its transport services to deliver grain to port for export.' The revocation will be effective from 1 May 2012. ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel said that by 'virtue of the notified conduct CBH is the monopoly supplier of transport services for moving grain to port in WA' and the 'notified conduct allows CBH to leverage its substantial market power in up-country storage to insulate itself from any competition in the supply of grain transport services.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/994735" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/832245/fromItemId/776499" target="_blank">notification register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:57:38 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F3D6D8B9-5B3C-42AC-8398-EE901CC78F7A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC must rely less on chairman</title>
      <link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business-old/accc-must-rely-less-on-its-chairman-survey-finds/story-e6frg8zx-1226082386805</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Richard Gluyas reports ('<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business-old/accc-must-rely-less-on-its-chairman-survey-finds/story-e6frg8zx-1226082386805" target="_blank">ACCC must rely less on its chairman, survey finds</a>', The Australian, 27 June 2011) on the Global Competition Review's 10th annual survey of antitrust organisations. While the report 'mostly commends' the work of the ACCC, the ACCC 'could benefit from a higher profile for other commissioners'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:57:20 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E72B9ED0-685E-42D2-B03A-DDC81C717484</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling debate and amendment</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Debate resumed on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Government's price signalling bill</a> at 9.30pm last night (see <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/reps/dailys/dr230611.pdf" target="_blank">Hansard, 23 June, from page 85</a>). Mr Billson (Shadow Minister for Small Business, Competition Policy and
Consumer Affairs) was the only speaker and was critical of the government's bill and the 'consultation' process regarding the bill. Debate was adjourned after about 15 minutes. In the meantime the Government has proposed yet another <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/amend/r4548_amend_8be8c1f2-63e0-4a76-943e-61d99aebf09b/upload_pdf/CA206.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf" target="_blank">amendment to the bill</a> containing yet another  exception relating to communications following borrower insolvency (this problem was not mentioned in <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010pricesignal.html">the report</a>  which recommended passage of the bill in existing form).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:34:38 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6029CF3A-5262-4372-99D5-32465369AD6C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price Signalling report out</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010pricesignal.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Yesterday the House Standing Committee on Economics finally presented it's report: '<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/economics/1BillPriceSignalling/report.htm" target="_blank">Advisory Report on the Competition and Consumer (Price Signalling)   Amendment Bill 2010 and the Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No.   1) 2011</a>'. The report was due on 30 May and has only now been released. It will be of little surprise to anyone that the House Committee recommended passage of the Government's bill and rejection of the private member's bill put forward by Bruce Billson MP. More details will follow on <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010pricesignal.html">my report page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:26:13 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2620E4EA-9A93-4460-8C3E-44F49445895F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts GrainCorp's wheat port access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/993705</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has accepted GrainCorp's wheat port access arrangements for October 2011 to   September 2014. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/993705" target="_blank">View ACCC press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:25:29 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6BD338CF-8752-4411-863A-41ED3F0AD585</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims puts NBN on notice</title>
      <link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/acccs-new-chief-puts-national-broadband-network-on-notice/story-e6frg9hx-1226079509257</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Australian reports that incoming ACCC chairman, Rod Sims (whose appointment was approved by the states last week) has declared the NBN a 'straight-out- monopoly' which will be a focus for the ACCC. See Glenda Korporaal, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/acccs-new-chief-puts-national-broadband-network-on-notice/story-e6frg9hx-1226079509257" target="_blank">ACCC's new chief puts National Broadband Network on Notice</a>' (The Australian, 22 June 2011).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:38:31 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A06E635C-88BF-45B6-91A2-9E294FD371A2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sims appointed next Chairman of ACCC</title>
      <link>http://www.treasurer.gov.au/displaydocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/067.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=wms&amp;Year=&amp;DocType=0</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Governor-General has appointed Rod Sims the next chairman of the ACCC following unanimous support for his appointment by the states and territories. His five year term will start on 1 August. <a href="http://www.treasurer.gov.au/displaydocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/067.htm&pageID=003&min=wms&Year=&DocType=0" target="_blank">View Treasury media release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:42:47 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E5D858F2-FB93-4701-847A-993BBD8CBA40</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft decision proposes to allow collective bargaining by dairy farmers to continue for a further 10 years</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA["ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel said the ACCC has reviewed the ADF's    bargaining arrangements are supported and well   understood by dairy farmers and processors. As such the ACCC considers   it is in a position to grant authorisation for ten years, rather than   the five sought by the ADF."" View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/992865" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:48:47 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">198C33C8-8530-4917-A14A-37681659B202</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows WA chicken growers to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA["The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has decided to allow Western Australian broiler chicken growers to collectively bargain with their processors.  ". View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/992848" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:48:12 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4D0C06E8-B594-4827-9F18-DD775ABC951B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel Criminalisation in NZ - exposure draft</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Ministry of Economic Development, NZ, has released an exposure draft Bill 'to test whether it is possible to define with sufficient clarity the   prohibition and exemptions, such that any downsides of criminalisation   are remedied or at least mitigated. If this can be achieved then there   may be benefit in following international enforcement trends and   criminalising hard-core cartel behaviour.' Submissions are invited and due by Friday 22 July 2011. <a href="http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/ContentTopicSummary____42449.aspx" target="_blank">View press release and exposure draft bill</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:47:19 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B2CB842C-7E80-453F-9D84-CFA1386B4B81</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government re-introduces creeping acquisition Bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 has been re-introduced (it was <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2010ccla.html">previously introduced on 27 May 2010</a> but lapsed with the last election). <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/013.htm&pageID=005&min=djb&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">View second reading speech by the Hon David Bradbury MP</a>. View <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr4600%22" target="_blank">bill home page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:18:23 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">EDEE7323-1094-4AE9-9BCC-8AF94DDDA82E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel speech to National Press Club</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Graeme Samuel addressed the National Press Club today with a speech entitled: "Collins Street sleeper agent or Castro's right-hand man'. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/992580" target="_blank">View speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:13:19 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">286F4AA1-8B9B-41DA-84B5-8F15910AC011</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>House Committee releases new submissions on price signalling Bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010pricesignal.html">House Standing Committee on Economics</a> has finally released submissions made to it on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011</a>. These 11 submissions add to the seven previously made in relation to the private member's <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2010pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer (Price Signalling) Amendment Bill 2010</a>. The Committee was due to report on both bills by 30 May 2011. The report, if it exists, has not yet been made public. <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/economics/1BillPriceSignalling/subs.htm" target="_blank">View submissions</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:18:46 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">879254C5-0686-420A-9C7E-E4E6632E8EB7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash ready for favorable decision on Franklins acquisition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The AFR reports (Sue Mitchell, page 19) that Metcash may learn this week whether or not the Federal Court will block the proposed acquisition of Franklins. Metcash and some retail analysts are confident Justice Arthur Emmett will find in their favour, but it is also expected the ACCC will appeal an unfavourable decision.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:18:23 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F5A54768-CC30-4FED-A925-A58E581ABD75</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose funerals acquisition after undertaking resolves concerns</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Bledisloe Group Holdings Pty   Ltd by InvoCare Limited after competition concerns were resolved by   InvoCare /fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/991798" target="_blank">mergers register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:37:13 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5E58282C-0FCD-4843-BAEA-BBA88730E034</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC approves variation to chemical waste collection scheme</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has ' allowed AgStewardship to expand its industry waste reduction scheme to   cover a broader range of agricultural and veterinary chemical   containers.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/991870/fromItemId/2332" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/985697" target="_blank">Authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:36:49 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">65837EF7-185A-46E0-A9E1-EF229E0B80DD</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval to Qantas and American Airlines joint business agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA['Under the proposed JBA, the airlines will coordinate operations on   services between Australia/New Zealand and the United States (the   trans-Pacific routes), and on their respective services which support   the trans-Pacific routes. Qantas and American Airlines do not currently   compete directly on any routes.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/991737" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/987619" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:36:24 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CF84BFE3-BEC7-4324-AB2D-C69E1BA426EE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bradbury speech to ABA Banking Regulations Forum</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                <p>Yesterday it was Munchenberg's turn; today <a href="http://ministers.treasury=005&min=djb&Year=&DocType=1" target="_blank">The Hon David Bradbury MP addressed the ABA's Banking Regulations Forum in Sydney</a>. This is what he said in relation to price signalling (nothing new, so don't get excited):</p>
                <blockquote>
                  <p>"The Government also wants to see consumers get a better deal on their home loans by prohibiting anti-competitive price signalling. While information disclosure plays a vital role in any economy, in some cases, it can impede competition. </p>
                  <p>The Government has a Bill currently before Parliament to amend the Competition and Consumer Act to provide new prohibitions to address anti-competitive price signalling and information disclosures.
                    
                    The Bill is not directed towards ordinary commercial communications. Banks will be able to continue communicating with their customers, shareholders, market analysts, employees and other stakeholders in the ordinary course of business.
                    
                    The Bill provides that banks will still be able to fully comply with any continuous disclosure obligations, such as discussing their funding costs, as well as any other legal or regulatory obligations. </p>
                  <p>The Government has worked closely with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to design these amendments, <strong>consulting extensively </strong>on the draft legislation with the banking industry, legal experts and other stakeholders.
                    
                    This <strong>extensive consultation </strong>has produced laws which will effectively address the issue of anti-competitive price signalling and information disclosures, while allowing banks to get on with business." (emphasis added)</p>
                </blockquote>
                <p>Extensive consulations. Yes, that is what he said. It's hard to imagine what a consultation which was not extensive would look like. Alternatively the extensive consultation has been very secret indeed, so that nobody actually knows about it. I'm still checking the HOR Inquiry website each day - but still no published submissions on the bill or a report (now overdue by well over a week).</p>
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:15:37 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B3741808-5A96-4221-91AB-224848F8703D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Munchenberg critical of Labor policy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                <p>Perhaps not surprisingly, ABA chief Steven Munchenberg has attacked the government for making policy on the run that will damage the banking sector. Amongst the policy under attack was that relating to price signalling (<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010pricesignal.html" target="_blank">still no report released on that</a>). In a <a href="http://www.bankers.asn.au/Speeches-2011/default.aspx" target="_blank">speech delivered at the Banking Regulations Forum   in Sydney yesterday</a>, he claimed (not without justification) that: "There no longer seems to be any onus on those demanding regulation to show that there is really a problem requiring a general regulatory response".
                  
                  Mr Munchenberg said the government's crackdown on price signalling and credit-card reforms were prime examples of regulation that was not needed for customers or the banking industry. In relation to price signalling he claimed:</p>
                <blockquote>
                  <p>"I have hunted high and low to
                    understand the burning issue of price signalling in banking. </p>
                  <p>I hear what politicians on both sides claim, but it is interesting
                    to note that there was very little suggestion that price signalling
                    was a problem in the banking sector, until the Coalition
                    announced that it was going to introduce new regulation to fix
                    the problem we weren’t aware that we had."</p>
                </blockquote>
                <p>See Scott Murdoch, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aba-chief-steven-munchenberg-slams-labor-for-policy-on-the-run/story-e6frg8zx-1226071278299" target="_blank">ABA chief Steven Munchenberg slams Labor for policy on the run</a>' (The Australian, 8 June 2011). See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/finance-sector-in-bid-to-block-ban-on-exit-fees-on-mortgages/story-e6frg9io-1226070469013" target="_blank">Finance sector in bid to block ban on exit fees on mortgages</a>' (The Australian, 7 June 2011) discussing the issue of price signalling and the proposed ban on exit fees (claiming both are examples of 'poor public policy in the name of short-term political point-scoring').</p>
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:47:57 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D4E51938-2DDC-4EA1-841D-D54AB6415A58</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No news on price signalling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                All seems quiet on the price signalling front; the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010pricesignal.html" target="_blank">House Economics Committee was due to report</a> on 30 May, but the report has not been tabled and is not available on the web site. Nor are the submissions made to the Committee regarding the Government's price signalling bill. At least one of these can be found elsewhere - for example, <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a> has his joint submission (with <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Caron Beaton-Wells</a>) up on <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/publications.html" target="_blank">his website</a>, but there is no justification for the delay in publishing all submissions made on the APH website, which indicates they will be published once received and authorised for publication - it is now almost two weeks since submissions were due (on 20 May). Silence also surrounds the report - the last media release did not alter the reporting date of 30 May. I will post an update when I know more. In relation to the bill <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html" target="_blank">Brent Fisse</a> also has a forthcoming article: 'Why the Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011 is   International Worst Practice - An Illustrated Summary' which may be of interest - an <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/images/CCA_Bill_No_1_2011_-_International_Worst_Practice_-_Abstract_0804111.pdf" target="_blank">abstract</a> is available from his web site.
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:47:15 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">631C8C73-E47E-4F60-9117-EEE88F6DD08D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC looks at Foxtel's bid for Austar</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">commenced review of Foxtel's proposed acquisition of Austar</a> on 26 May. On 31 May they released a letter for interested parties seeking information regarding the proposed acquisition, including background information. Submissions are due by 16 June 2011. The proposed date for the ACCC to announce its findings is 21 July.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:25:45 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64367AA0-67C3-4257-A0D2-3A74D0ECBD1F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AFR: Treasury deaf to reform ideas</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Page 20 of the AFR has an item by Jane Searle and Matthew Drummond discussing, amongst other things, the lack of consultation surrounding the proposed price signalling laws. Last week interested parties were given less than three days to make submissions to the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010pricesignal.html" target="_blank">HOR Economics Committee</a> on the government's proposed price signalling bill. Submissions made in relation to the government's bill have not yet been published (the inquiry is also considering the opposition's price signalling bill - submissions relating to that bill were due earlier in the year and have been published). The inquiry home page still indicates that a report is due by Monday.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 09:37:27 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">FD38107A-2291-4E1F-8920-A80611E4721F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blunt Report (1979) available online</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/1979blunt.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I have just received copyright approval from the ACCC to reproduce the Report of the Trade Practices Consultative Committee: <em>Small business and the Trade Practices Act </em>(Volume 1, December 1979). I hope to be able to make some more of the older trade practices reports available soon (pending further permissions). Although a 1979 report, it is interesting to note that some of the same issues continue to re-surface in current inquiries. Given some of the recommendations stemming from recent milk inquiries, chapter 10 of this Blunt Report, which discusses 'price discrimination' in detail, may be of particular interest; the Committee concludes that s 49 (which at the time prohibited price discrimination) should be repealed. As I have digitised from an older copy it does contain some markings, but all text is readable.<strong><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/pdf/bluntreport1979.pdf">View full report</a></strong> (PDF: 5mb - 127 pages). See also my <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/1979blunt.html">Blunt Committee page</a>, which includes some shorter extracts from the report.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:22:01 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13D322CB-08DD-4F4D-9BC2-403B5C5F06CC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation to vary chemical waste collection scheme</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/988565</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to AgStewardship's proposal to expand the types of agricultural and veterinary chemical containers it accepts for collection and recycling. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/988565" target="_blank">View press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:16 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A901BF1D-DEF6-4488-B6CB-D49EFF24BF22</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling inquiry - act now</title>
      <link>http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/economics/1BillPriceSignalling/media.htm</link>
      <description><![CDATA[House Standing Committee on Economics has <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/economics/1BillPriceSignalling/index.htm" target="_blank">called for submissions</a> on an 'expanded' inquiry into the <a href="legislation/2010pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer (Price Signalling) Amendment Bill 2010</a> and the <a href="legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011</a> (previously the house was considering only the 2010 bill) - it's given interested parties a whole TWO DAYS to make submissions (<strong>submissions are due 20 May 2011</strong>). Despite the hopelessly inadequate amount of time (especially in light of recent <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/scrutiny/alerts/2011/d04.pdf" target="_blank">Senate Standing Committee conerns</a> over the government's bill) hopefully there will be time for some sensible submissions; however, in light of the farcical time frame for submissions I'm not holding my breath about the extent to which they will be considered by the Committee.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 12:38:04 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3D30CCCC-BCFA-476C-8447-2A543431FB12</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AFR Op-Ed - Draft competition laws fail at first post</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>Have a look at the op-ed on page 63 of today's Fin Review by Caron Beaton-Wells and Brent Fisse, who have been the most vocal commentators on the Government's proposed price signalling laws. Amongst other things, they call for release of 'the independent legal advice on which [the Government] has relied.' This is particularly topical given the House Standing Committee's call for submissions on the price signalling bills.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 12:44:30 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34CAC583-4803-4221-8FA2-5558AD1EC948</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Criminal cartel blog symposium</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                Daniel Sokol is currently hosting a <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/05/blog-book-symposium-on-criminalising-cartels-critical-studies-of-an-international-regulatory-movemen.html" target="_blank">Blog Symposium</a> featuring discussion of the book by <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/sexperts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Caron Beaton-Wells</a> and <a href="http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/profile/ezrachia" target="_blank">Ariel Ezrachi</a> (editors) - <a href="http://www.hartpub.co.uk/books/details.asp?isbn=9781849460255" target="_blank">Criminalising Cartels: Critical Studies of an International Regulatory Movement</a>. Initial comments will be provided by <a href="http://www0.hku.hk/law/faculty/staff/cheng_thomas.html" target="_blank">Thomas Cheng</a> (Hong Kong), <a href="http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/law/profiles/500" target="_blank">Angus MacCulloch</a> (Lancaster, UK), <a href="http://www.kpplaw.eu/el/our-lawyers/partners/dr-anestis-s-papadopoulos" target="_blank">Anestis Papadopoulos</a> (Athens, Greece), <a href="http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/sokol/" target="_blank">Daniel Sokol</a> (Florida, USA) and myself. The first two reviews, by <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/05/angus-macculloch-blog-symposium-comments-on-criminalising-cartels-critical-studies-of-an-internation.html" target="_blank">Angus MacCulloch</a> and <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2011/05/julie-clarke-comments-on-blog-symposium-criminalising-cartels-critical-studies-of-an-international-r.html" target="_blank">myself</a> have been posted; the remaining reviews will be posted on 24 May on the <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/" target="_blank">Antitrust and Competition Policy Blog</a>. It is anticipated that Caron and Ariel and some of the authors will then participate in responding/discussing the posts. Given Australia's recent criminalisation of cartels this may be of interest to some.
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 10:04:45 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">FEE53BCE-2C4A-43F8-B470-5BA597CADA0E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow collective bargaining by WA chicken growers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft decision proposing to allow WA broker chicken growers to collectively bargain with processors. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/987569" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/972089" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 10:03:15 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D1CF8455-CD28-4B15-B799-FB4832BDE8E2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Standing Committee raises concerns about Government's price signalling bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Yesterday the Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills released an Alert Digest identifying some concerns with <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No.1) 2011</a> (the Government's price signalling bill).  In particular, the Committee noted that 'it is of concern that this scope of the prohibitions introduced by this bill are to be determined entirely through delegated legislation.' Treasury advice is sought about the possibility of defining the scope of the law in primary legislation, and it is noted that in the meantime 'the Committee draws Senators’ attention to the provisions, as they may be considered to delegate legislative powers inappropriately'.  See <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/scrutiny/alerts/2011/d04.pdf" target="_blank">Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills Altert Digest 4</a> (pages 19-20).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 09:21:52 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">903470F4-E225-45D1-B13E-835C7901E043</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Parliament calls on ACCC to examine the market power of 'big' supermarkets</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We don't need to wait for the Senate Economics Committee report, the House has drawn its own conclusions. The following motion was brought and agreed to in the House of Representatives (<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/reps/dailys/dr120511.pdf" target="_blank">Hansard</a> pp 71-72):</p>
<p>That this House:
(1) notes with concern the impact on the Dairy Industry of the Coles milk pricing strategy and that:
(a) dairy farmers around the country are today seriously questioning their future having suffered through one of the worst decades in memory including droughts, floods, price cuts and rising cost of inputs such as energy and feed;
(b) unsustainable retail milk prices will, over time, compel processors to renegotiate contracts with dairy farmers and the prospect that these contracts will be below the cost of production may force many to leave the industry;
(c) the fact that supermarkets are now selling milk cheaper than many varieties of bottled water will be the straw that finally breaks the camel's back for many dairy farmers; and
(d) the risk of other potential impacts includes:
(i) decreased competition as name brands are forced from the shelves; and
(ii) the possible loss of fresh milk supplies to some parts of the country as local fresh milk industries become unviable; and (2) calls on the Government to:
  (a) ask the ACCC to immediately examine the big supermarkets and milk wholesalers after recent price cuts to ensure they do not have too much market power and are not anti-competitive in their behaviour; and
  (b) support the new <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html">Senate inquiry into the ongoing milk price</a> war between the country's major supermarket chains'.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 09:19:54 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">22F0E991-8E23-4A4E-B910-4C8F863D4F5A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows continuation of refrigerant recovery scheme</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authorisation to allow Refrigerant Reclaim Australia to continue to operate a 'scheme to recover, reclaim, store or safely dispose of refrigerant.' See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/987403" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953331" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 22:03:59 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6C4B068A-6ED4-4A99-9C68-B63B85446877</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Westfarmers possible acquisition of interests in Burrup Holdings</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/987171</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=MER11+5322.pdf&trimFileTitle=MER11+5322.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=987135" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the possible acquisition by Westfarmers of interests in Burrup Holdings Ltd and/or Burrup Fertilisers. Submissions can be made until 30 May; final decision deferred until 23 June. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/987171" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/972831" target="_blank">mergers register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 10:26:26 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BE4D4F09-FA9F-45CE-8ABA-C53929988EEA</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New CCLJ out</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The latest CCLJ (Volume 18 No 3) is out with some interesting competition law items: Justice Finkelstein contributes an article, 'Crimes and punishments of competition law' and Justice Nettle likewise contributes an article focusing on recent cartel criminalisation: 'Criminalisation of cartel conduct: Commentary'. Both are edited versions of papers presented at the 2010 Trade Practices Conference in Adelaide. Then there are two papers dealing with the mischief rule of statutory interpretation for dealing with SLC issues - they are 'Running the mischief rule over appellate decisions trans-Tasman' by Justice Fogarty and comments on this paper by Kerrin Vautier. The next article is by Max Bessell, David Round, Manish Agarwal and Bernhard Lobmayr: 'How big can the Big 4 (or 3) get?A study of audit firm concentration in Australia'. The final article is by Kylie Pappalardo and Nicolas Suzor, entitled 'Standardisation and patent ambush: Potential liability under Australian competition law'. Two new competition books are also reviewed: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Antitrust-Law-Economics-Encyclopedia/dp/1847207316" target="_blank">Antitrust Law and Economics</a> by Keith N Nylton (reviewed by <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/smith-rhonda.html">Rhonda Smith</a>) and <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/book2011beatonwells.html">Australian Cartel Regulation</a> by Caron Beaton-Wells and Brent Fisse, which I have reviewed.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:00:36 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14424258-075A-40B2-8C04-202D50316F92</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Milk inquiry second interim report released</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Senate has released its 98 page <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/economics_ctte/dairy_industry_supermarket_2011/second_interim_report/index.htm" target="_blank">second interim report</a> on '<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html">The impacts of supermarket price decisions on the dairy industry</a>'. In it the committee notes that many of the issues raised by the inquiry 'require scrutiny over a longer period of time' and, accordingly, concludes that 'it is not able to draw final conclusions or make recommendations at this stage'. Recommendations will be made in the final report to be released in October. Additional comments were made by a group of Senators comprising Nick Xenophon, Bill Heffernan, John WIlliams and Christine Milne, who criticise the government for not enacting any of the recommendations from the 2010 <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010milk.html">Milking it for all it's worth</a> report and (predictably) criticise the ACCC. Senator Scott Ryan provides a much more reasoned 'Additional Comment' to the report, beginning p 74. More detail on this in my <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/10/milk-inquiry-report2/" target="_blank">blog piece</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 20:56:18 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45023C07-3032-47DF-919A-DEB5A0163522</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Bank report released</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Senate has released its <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/banking_comp_2010/report/index.htm" target="_blank">374 page report</a> on 'Competition within the Australian banking sector'. It includes recommendations for modification of the government's proposed price signalling legislation. More details to follow. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010bank.html">View more on the Senate inquiry</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 15:53:12 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D5D3B7D6-40B9-44DC-9D1B-64B5E29F72CB</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fortescue loses access appeal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Federal Court Chief Justice Keane and Justices Mansfield and Middleton have denied an appeal by Fortescue to obtain access to Rio Tinto's Hamersley rail line in the Pilbara. In addition, Rio Tinto succeeded in a an appeal to overturn the ACT's decision to declare the Robe River line. Fortescue was ordered to pay costs. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/fortescue.html">View the Tribunal's finding</a>. See, for example, Matthew Stevens, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/fortescue-the-architect-of-its-own-pilbara-rail-defeat/story-e6frg9lx-1226050077409" target="_blank">Fortescue the architect of its own Pilbara rail defea</a>t' (The Australian, 5 May 2011). The decision is not yet available through <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2011/" target="_blank">AustLII</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 11:56:30 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F20AB2DC-B868-4D15-8E07-25D3FE7A6BD7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Press Conference with the Treasurer and Rod Sims</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Rod Sims has appeared before a press conference discussing his nomination. He refused to be drawn into specific questions relating to the supermarket price wars, petrol pricing etc. He observed that the ACCC "plays an  absolutely pivotal role in the Australian economy and indeed I   think the sort  of role that the ACCC plays is really fundamental to   the proper functioning of  any market company." View <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=transcripts/2011/059.htm&pageID=004&min=wms&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">transcript of press conference</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 17:08:58 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BC0C7424-8FCD-4CF8-B461-92AB14338AE5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rod Sims nominated as next ACCC Chairman</title>
      <link>http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/03/rod-sims-chairman/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Gillard Government has nominated Rod Sims to be the next Chairman of the ACCC. It is seeking majority support from States and Territories for the appointment. Presuming it is received, Mr Sims will be appointed on 1 August for a 5 year term. View <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/043.htm&pageID=003&min=wms&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">media release</a>.  <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/03/rod-sims-chairman/" target="_blank">View my blog for more details</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 13:53:46 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4A9A846A-7D58-4271-8940-C8D39648D9B3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Milk wars not a threat to farmers</title>
      <link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/milk-wars-not-a-threat-to-farmers-says-coles-research/story-e6frg95o-1226045862359</link>
      <description><![CDATA[An item by Damon Kitney in today's Australian discusses the findings of a research report commissioned by Coles regarding the recent milk wars. <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/milk-wars-not-a-threat-to-farmers-says-coles-research/story-e6frg95o-1226045862359" target="_blank">View article</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:49:19 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0F63D4EB-2C41-4CFA-B399-68A0A01C092E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Cellarmasters sale</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/984622</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose Woolworths' proposed acquisition of The Cellermasters Group. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/984622" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/984604" target="_blank">mergers register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:48:51 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">AA89C317-B691-4065-AC4D-48FF8264AD79</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Milk inquiry interim report released</title>
      <link>http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2011/04/20/milk-interim-report/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On 20 April the Senate  released its "interim report" on the infamous "milk wars", it which is called on the Government to table a formal response to the Senate's earlier '<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/dairy_industry_09/report/index.htm" target="_blank">Milking it for all it's worth</a>' report and then explained why it was no yet releasing a full report.  It indicated a further interim report will be released by 10 May and a final report by 1 October.  View <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/economics_ctte/dairy_industry_supermarket_2011/interim_report/index.htm" target="_blank">interim report</a>.  View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html">more on this inquiry</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:48:19 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ED5ED3F0-31AE-48EA-8624-6D06C326630D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows industry to levy to fund waste paint collection trial</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authorisation to allow the Australian Paint Manufacturers Federation to conduct a 12 month waste paint collectrial trial, funded by a 2 cent per litre levy on the wholesale supply of certain paint. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/984438" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/951852" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:47:36 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">327C07F8-3CF1-42B8-9720-3DF087ABFCBF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows collective bargaining by Australian Hotels Association</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has authorised collective bargaining by the AHA in relation to its dealing with a range of suppliers, including Fox Sports and Tabcorp. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/984424" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953514/fromItemId/401858" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:47:07 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20016BBC-CCE7-4E02-AE51-A567DDA96DB3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Court of NZ dishes out record penalty for abuse of power</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The High Court of New Zealand today penalised Telecom NZ $12million for breach of s 36 of the Commerce Act (equivalent to <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca46.html">s 46 CCA</a>). This is the largest penalty ever imposed under our <em>Commerce Act 1986</em>.Justice Rodney Hansen provides a relatively lengthy and useful discussion of factors to be considered in imposing a penalty. The Commerce Commission sought penalties of between NZ$20-25million.   Telecom argued for no penalty, or a modest one, claiming the contravention was 'limited and minor'. The maximum penalty, given Telecom's turnover, was $279.2 million. In his judgment, Justice Hansen referred to <em>Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corp Ltd [2010] FCA 790</em> as being closest in facts for the purposes of assessing appropriate penalties (in that case Telstra was penalised $A18,550,000). See <a href="http://media.nzherald.co.nz/webcontent/document/pdf/201117/Telecom_HighCourt_decision%28pdf%29.pdf" target="_blank">Commerce Commission v Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Limited</a>. Thanks to Ben for alerting me to the decision.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:29:40 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A47A2947-2940-4D52-A6E8-3937E4650BCB</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling - Samuel v Fisse</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Page 48 of today's AFR features an item by Duncan Hughes, 'ACCC boss stands firm on cartels' in which Samuel claims that the 'proposed government reforms to ban price signalling are entirely consistent with best practice in Europe and the US'. In response, <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a> has provided his analysis (<a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/news.html" target="_blank">available on his web site</a>) of why he considers this to be incorrect and highly misleading. Never one to mince words, Fisse claims that the proposed bill 'represents international worst practice on information exchanges between competitors' and refers to the bill as 'mindless proposed legislation'. Brent Fisse is the co-author (with Caron Beaton-Wells) of the new book, '<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/book2011beatonwells.html">Australian Cartel Regulation</a>' published by CUP.  View also <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/images/CCA_Bill_No_1_2011_-_International_Worst_Practice_-_Abstract_0804111.pdf" target="_blank">The Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011: International Worst Practice on Information Exchanges Between Competitors (abstract)</a> (PDF)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:57:18 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9E1BE30D-15CB-4A3F-823F-C4B42D39D4F4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bradbury speech on price signalling</title>
      <link>http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/007.htm&amp;pageID=005&amp;min=djb&amp;Year=&amp;DocType</link>
      <description><![CDATA[David Bradbury MP Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, had given a <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/007.htm&pageID=005&min=djb&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">speech to Gilbert and Tobin Lawyers</a> on <em>Anti-competitive price signalling and information disclosure</em>. In it, he claims the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">government's price signalling bill</a>, currently before parliament, will first apply to banks because there is "strong evidence that anti-competitive price signalling has been occurring" in that sector. He reiterates that the laws will only be extended to other sectors 'after further detailed consideration'. He further claims that the laws "laws will close an  identified gap between Australian competition   law and the laws of major  international jurisdictions, such as the   United Kingdom, United States and the  European Union, which deal with   anti-competitive price signalling and  information disclosures." [differences between those laws and the one the government proposes are not acknowledged]. <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/007.htm&pageID=005&min=djb&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">View speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:47:09 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D4AD19C0-C954-4505-B968-E1A84E009C5E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bradbury speech to Regulatory Reform Conference</title>
      <link>http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/006.htm&amp;pageID=005&amp;min=djb&amp;Year=&amp;DocType</link>
      <description><![CDATA[David Bradbury MP has delivered an address to the Regulatory Reform Conference: <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=speeches/2011/006.htm&pageID=005&min=djb&Year=&DocType" target="_blank"><em>The Critical Role of Competition Policy</em></a>. It's pretty light on - a bit of history and a bit of discussion about international competitiveness and some rhetoric about needing to remain competitive and not being 'complacent' about achievements gained through competition policy.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:30 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C67A87B2-1898-4F02-9484-75479BAA5E8B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price fixing penalty imposed on Japan Airlines</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/982436</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court has ordered a $5.5 million penalty against Japan Airlines International Co Ltd (JAL) for price fixing. JAL is the seventh airline to settle in the ACCC's air cargo cartel proceedings, with total combined penalties now reaching $46.5 million. JAL admitted the price fixing conduct at an early stage and cooperated with the ACCC with the result that it received a significantly discounted penalty. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/982436" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:44:24 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4EEC2046-4833-44A0-AB7E-B87F81000D04</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New milk inquiry transcript available</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The final transcript from Senate hearings relating to the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html" target="_blank">milk inquiry</a> is now <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/commttee/S13727.pdf" target="_blank">available here</a>. This involves testimony from Coles and Woolworths and lots of aggression from Bill Heffernan (who would prefer that the supermarkets discounted water ...). It also features Senator Colbeck informing Senator Heffernan that he doesn't look anything like Senator Hurley. Worth a read.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 09:43:25 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8A8DF702-AEDD-4EF8-B700-858AB2C78440</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises collective bargaining by elite swimmers</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/981744</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has re-authorised the Australian Swimmers' Association Incorporated (ASA) to collectively bargain with Swimming Australia Limited (SAL).  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/981744" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/955699" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:42:38 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4CF0B43B-BA2D-48D4-AB6A-F8D83CD9A62D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Graeme Samuel will stand down as ACCC Chair</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[John Durie in the Australian (<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/long-process-to-select-new-accc-chief/story-e6frg9io-1226034006499" target="_blank">Long process to select new ACCC chief</a>) reports that Graeme Samuel has now officially announced his intention not to seek a further term as ACCC chief. Although he has previously indicated he would not seek a further term, there had been continuing speculation that he might - an email to staff was intended to end this speculation. As a result, his term will come to an end on 31 April 2011. See also '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/ACCC-boss-to-stand-down-report-pd20110405-FM57R?OpenDocument" target="_blank">ACCC boss to stand down: report</a>' (Business Spectator)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:52:23 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">341E3403-E50D-4944-9E42-0A263A93413A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Standing up for Coles</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Paul Kerin in today's SMH ('<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/milking-the-cash-cow-20110404-1cym0.html" target="_blank">Milking the cash cow</a>') provides one of the few media articles which point out the hypocrisies inherent in some of the criticisms of Coles' pricing strategies. He also points out, as most have neglected, that the biggest critics are the suppliers which have significant vested interests. He also talks about <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/law/rpm.html">resale price maintenance</a> in an article, which is enough to bring a smile to my face any day. He also calls out Nick Zenophon for blindly defending the suppliers: "Yet politicians like Senator Nick Xenophon have swallowed them   completely and are making outlandish policy recommendations on the run." He further goes on to discuss the dubious economics and 'real life' consequences of predatory pricing claims. The article can't get much better ... well worth a read.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:51:57 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">FCF80AC7-DC04-49BC-B11C-79BF931B086F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Private predatory pricing action?</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/farmers-backed-in-coles-milk-battle/story-fn7x8me2-1226033629873" target="_blank">Farmers backed in Coles milk battle</a>' (Herald Sun, 5 April 2011), Matt Johnston claims that the Australian Dairy Farmers group 'is canvassing financial support to bankroll a case against Coles, accusing the supermarket giant of predatory pricing'. Coles denies engaging in predatory pricing, claiming it has not been selling milk at a loss (which is required for a successful action under the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2007tpla.html">Birdsville Amendment</a>, although it is not a pre-requisite under the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca46.html">standard misuse of market power provision</a>, which might also found a claim for predatory pricing). The article also notes that farmers allege there is a 'prima facie case of price discrimination' between private labels and processor brands (although given price discrimination is not illegal in itself, the relevance of this appears to be in providing anti-competitive purpose rather than founding a separate cause of action) and that they believe Coles' actions constitute predatory pricing. The article also states that companies found guilty of predatory pricing face fines of up to $10m (although that is not the maximum fine limit anymore). Coles, who no doubt are fairly well informed of their obligations under the CCA - particularly the very prescriptive, if not economically justifiable, Birdsville Amendment - have denied below cost pricing, so it's tough to see a claim succeeding in relation to this provision - but as a matter of pure academic interest, I'd love to see it litigated ...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:09:02 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47D45DD0-CF28-448A-9873-9F707362AC2F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More news on the supermarket price wars</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It's in the paper virtually every day now - see, for example, Andrew Carswell, '<a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/money/coles-milking-the-price-war-for-all-its-woolworths/story-e6frezc0-1226032873951" target="_blank">Coles milking the price war for all it's Woolworths</a>' (The Daily Telegraph, 4 April 2011). IGA claims Coles' Down Down campaign is deceiving the public. It's not entirely clear how. I wonder if the Senate will launch new inquiries into every affected industry ...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:23:07 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CC639552-59D0-430A-8E77-21D4D68B2A9D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling laws back in news</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>There's an item on page 3 of Today's AFR by Matthew Drummond, 'Price signalling laws may be widened'. It notes that the ACCC is 'keen to have the laws applied more generally'. It also quotes Allen &amp; Overy's Dave Podder as saying that the law has 'created a runaway train because it's so badly drafted'.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:22:48 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">74AA3381-FD3F-46C1-B4C9-DC05CA296C9D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate attacks Coles</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Naturally the open-minded Senate in its milk-wars inquiry went on the attack yesterday as Coles appeared before them (see, eg, the unflattering photo of Bill Heffernan on the attack in Clany Yeates, '<a href="http://www.watoday.com.au/business/senators-suggest-breaking-up-big-supermarkets-20110329-1cetb.html" target="_blank">Senators suggest breaking up big supermarkets</a>'). Xenophon has the bright idea of breaking up Coles and Woolworths. Coles claims the discounts are sustainable; Woolworths claims they are not (although as price followers rather than leaders on this they have an obvious interest in the prices being raised).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:10:59 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">545AF3DB-6D67-4B23-B3C3-DDFD62AA28DE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coles, Woolworths and Choice to appear before Senate Milk Inquiry today</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The fourth public hearing into the<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html"> milk price wars</a> will be held in Canberra today - scheduled to appear are Coles, Woolworths and Choice. Coles has said that it is "looking forward to explaining to the Senate committee how it is   committed to reducing shelf prices for Australian shoppers, while   ensuring that primary producers are not disadvantaged in the process" (<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/now-for-a-war-over-chickens-flags-coles-20110328-1cdgz.html" target="_blank">see SMH</a>). Dairy farmers have <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/127331/20110327/dairy-farmers-unite-to-send-coles-woolworths-one-message-end-milk-price-war.htm" target="_blank">called on the supermarkets</a> to use their appearance before Senate to commit to ending the price war (ironically, much of this inquiry is about whether their conduct is anti-competitive; such a joint commitment would be the most overtly anti-competitive act to date). Chairman of the Dairy Farmers Milk Co-op, <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/127331/20110327/dairy-farmers-unite-to-send-coles-woolworths-one-message-end-milk-price-war.htm" target="_blank">Ian Zandstra has claimed </a>the supermarkets must be more transparent and that it is for them to prove they have not engaged in loss leading or predatory pricing; while this may be useful for PR purposes, it's clearly not their legal obligation. Meanwhile, Coles have indicated that the next product to be targeted in its 'Down Down' campaign is <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/coles-to-extend-discount-battles-as-ceo-remains-defiant/story-e6frg9h6-1226029675794" target="_blank">fresh chicken</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:37:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C7C9845A-ACF1-4C5C-B19F-11EE29A259D0</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash trial continues, without Metcash witnesses</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Metcash hearing continues, with the ACCC seeking an injunction to prevent Metcash from buying Franklins' grocery business. The ACCC's case has, however, hit a hurdle with Metcash announcing it will not call any witnesses, including Metcash boss, Andrew Reitzer, who the ACCC had been preparing to cross-examine. See Susannah Moran, "<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/watchdog-stymied-by-key-metcash-witness-no-show/story-e6frg8zx-1226029660693" target="_blank">Watchdog stymied by key Metcash witness no-show</a>', The Australian, 29 March.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:37:14 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4C443811-50D9-4630-9597-58C5A9C3F8C3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government introduces price signalling bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Yesterday the Government introduced the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2011pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No 1) 2011</a> to prohibit price signalling. This follows the release, late last year, of an <span class="chart"><a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011pricesignal.html">Exposure Draft Bill</a>.  Although there are some modifications, it is clear that fundamental concerns about the legislation were not given much consideration. The Bill introduced is longer and more complex than the Exposure Draft Bill, with amendments running to 14 pages of very dense legislative text. View <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22chamber%2Fhansardr%2F2011-03-24%2F0038%22" target="_blank">Second Reading Speech</a>. </span>See also '<a href="Crackdown on price signalling introduced" target="_blank">Crackdown on price signalling introduced</a>' (SMH, 24 March)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:46:23 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19E559B1-6035-4DBF-B9CB-4E058AFFE065</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Xenophon calls ACCC a toothless chihuahua</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In the context of the Foster's saga, Senator Xenophon has <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/fosters-pulls-beer-from-coles-woolworths-as-supermarkets-drop-prices/story-e6frf7l6-1226026727622" target="_blank">labeled the ACCC a toothless chihuahua</a> (he's also recently and unjustifiably attacked them in the farcical <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html#accc">Senate milk inquiry</a>). Senator Xenophon appears to be criticising the ACCC for not taking action against a non-breach of the legislation. He also suggests that ACCC is working hard to find '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/competition-a-casualty-in-beer-wars-xenophon-20110323-1c5ry.html" target="_blank">new ways to tell Australian consumers why they can't do anything</a>'. Of course, he thinks it's a great idea to deprive consumers of the opportunity to buy cheap bear. Senator Xenophon needs a little education in competition law and economics. In the meantime it may be better for everyone if he just stopped talking. Meanwhile, the Choice consumer group have attacked Foster's for their actions. <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/competition-a-casualty-in-beer-wars-xenophon-20110323-1c5ry.html" target="_blank">Christopher Zenn, for Choice, expressed justified cynicism</a> at Fosters' suggestion that it is concerned about the potential for the supermarkets to damage their brands through discount pricing (which is the key justification for the loss-leader defence relied upon by Foster's).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:30:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">27199355-EA5E-4CF7-9FC0-FB0E59553657</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exit Fee ban passes through Parliament</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Gillard Government's ban on mortgage exit fees passed into law today. It will apply to all new home loans from 1 January 2011. See <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/023.htm&pageID=003&min=wms&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">Wayne Swan's press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:42:15 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A3F0E1D0-A6EB-4A5A-8B72-B88DC8C994F9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foster's withheld beer supply to supermarkets on the basis of loss leader selling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Foster's has confirmed it withheld supplies of beer to Coles and Woolworths, claiming it relied on <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/2010cca98.html">s 98 of the CCA</a> (although everyone still seems to refer to the TPA) which allows them to withhold were their goods are used as loss-leaders. Not at all surprisingly, Senator Xenophon and his mate Frank Zumbo have been the first to come out in vocal support of Fosters' actions; Xenophon has called for the ACCC to outlaw below-cost pricing (apparently under the misapprehension that the ACCC has these magical powers - no doubt if up to him they would be given those bizarre powers) and Zumbo has praised Fosters as 'brave' for trying to 'protect competition' in the market. He manages to relate this back to the current milk inquiry where he claims that the selling of cheap milk will destroy dairy farmers and threaten access to fresh milk. There's no attempt at an economic rationale for that conclusion, but we wouldn't want to complicate matters (cf, for example, the evidence, of <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/king-stephen.html">Stephen King</a> before the Committee on 10 March). See, for example, Peter Ryan, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/23/3171105.htm?section=justin" target="_blank">Foster's pulls beer to foil price war</a>' (ABC News, 23 March 2011)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:52:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">AD70C6B9-AC67-4706-AA4D-95FE0FC051DC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC defends allegations it misled court</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has defended allegations it misled the court over a previously undisclosed meeting it had with Woolworths in December last year (after the ACCC indicated it would block Metcash's proposed takeover of Franklins). ACCC witnesses described the meeting as a 'thought bubble' and a 'back of the napkin exercise'. View <a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-business/accc-defends-allegations-it-misled-court-20110321-1c3k3.html" target="_blank">article by Drew Cratchley for AAP</a> (21 March 2011). See also Elisabeth Sexton, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/acccs-metcash-denial-20110321-1c3r9.html" target="_blank">ACCC's Metcash denial</a>, SMH, 22 March.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:56:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">404D4741-62FE-4E5E-81BF-68C3AF2F4DD6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose grain acquisition</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/978359</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose Cargill Inc's proposed acquisition from Agrium of the commodity management business of AWB Ltd, noting that the proposed acquisition is unlikely to substantially lessen competition because post merger Cargill will 'continue to face competition from a number of significant sources'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/978359" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/978281" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:18:14 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94420BDC-36F0-4FDC-BAC0-1BC3A39070F2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose acquisition of Austereo by Southern Cross</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/978327</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Austereo Group Ltd by Southern Cross National Network Pty Ltd.  The ACCC found that "due to the presence of existing competitors, the proposed acquisition   would not be likely to substantially lessen competition in any other   markets where Southern Cross and Austereo operate." See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/978327" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/978279" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:17:27 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4FFD55BE-CAB0-4054-9F52-8AE87DD379AB</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Milk inquiry continues</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Some of the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/economics_ctte/dairy_industry_supermarket_2011/hearings/index.htm" target="_blank">transcripts are now available</a> from the Senate's inquiry into the 'impacts of supermarket price decisions on the dairy industry' (naturally Frank Zumbo used the opportunity to once again rave about the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2007tpla.html">Birdsville amendment</a> on predatory pricing - he doesn't fail to mention he drafted it, amongst other things (such as a purported need for price discrimination laws and proposing an office of the Australian small business and farming commissioner)). Meanwhile, Coles has defended its milk pricing in its <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/economics_ctte/dairy_industry_supermarket_2011/submissions.htm" target="_blank">submission to the inquiry</a> (submission number 131), claiming it "did not intend to and has not sold retail milk at a price below the commercial cost of acquiring it from milk processors" (see also ABC, '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201103/s3165305.htm" target="_blank">Coles defends its milk pricing, in submission to inquiry</a>' (16 March 2011)). More to follow ...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:19:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9951DC14-3DDC-4CD8-8DB9-E9AC8F800F32</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dragon Alliance admits RPM</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/977903</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Dragon Alliance South Pacific Pty Ltd has "admitted restricting online retailers from selling Dragon's ski goggles, motorcross goggles and sunglasses below specified prices". It has provided court enforceable undertakings to the ACCC relating to furture conduct. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/977903" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/974709" target="_blank">register</a> (including undertaking)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:09:05 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">80DBF5F6-0513-4181-BB63-637CD4DFF175</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash trial underway</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The ACCC's injunction hearing to block Metcash's proposed acquisition of Franklins stores. Neat item by Hannah Low in today's AFR ('Grocery wars are raging: Metcash - page 3) and plenty more items avaiable online. The trial is before Justice Arthur Emmett.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:11:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7C5A8321-95A8-40FA-A519-FB8DB44806F4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC attacked in Senate milk hearings</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Yes, they've come under attack by politicians playing politics, with Senator Xenophon asking if the commission was 'asleep at the wheel' (transcript still not available, but see, for example, Philip Wen, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/watchdog-under-attack-20110309-1bnyt.html" target="_blank">Watchdog Under Attack</a>, SMH, 10 March. See also Alison Rehn, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/milk-war-sparks-watchdog-inquiry/story-e6frf7l6-1226018666963" target="_blank">Milk war sparks watchdog inquiry</a>' Herald Sun).Yes, somehow the ACCC have been napping and completely missed all the hype surrounding the 'milk wars' and the Senate inquiry they've been called before. Processors who believe there has been a contravention of the Act are, of course, free to take action. The ACCC does have some s 155 powers to obtain evidence where it believes there has been a contravention of the Act; on the other hand, if discussions have occurred (as the ACCC claims) with Coles and they have produced no evidence of 'below cost pricing', then these powers are more limited.  The ACCC have insisted that, within their powers, they are investigating the conduct for possible contraventions of misuse of market power or unconscionable conduct breaches - Graeme Samuel also noted that their investigation would be rigorous and independent, something neither the media nor Senate can claim. For something different from the popular media reporting (and there's plenty of it for those interested), see Stephen King's blog, '<a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=6796" target="_blank">Milk Headlines</a>' and David Leyonhjelm, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/WES-Coles-WOW-Woolworths-milk-war-pd20110310-EST8R?opendocument&src=rss" target="_blank">Milk wars will only lead to retailer skimming</a>' in the Business Spectator.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:26:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6A67E0FF-683A-4E11-B52D-97B313AF8884</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose Asahi's proposed acquisition of P&amp;N Beverages</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will oppose the proposed acquisition of P&N Beverages Australia by Asahi Holdings (Australia), out of concern that the proposed acquisition would 'remove a vigorous and effective competitor in the markets for the supply of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) and cordial'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/977029" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/977022" target="_blank">merger register</a>. I'm guessing that unlike the Metcash decision, this one won't prompt a Senate Inquiry, but the AFR reports today (Sue Mitchell, 'Asahi has ACCC in its sights', AFR, 10 March 2011, p 19) that Asahi is considering legal appeal against the ACCC's informal decision.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:26:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">768C70C6-857B-496F-98B4-F9BF96A7BE13</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow levy for waste paint collection trial</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is proposing to authorise a waste paint collection trial, funded by a 2 cents per litre levy on the wholesale supply of certain paint products. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/977065" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/951852" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:25:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B7E3B16C-4641-4DE0-BD7A-A87BC90BCBA2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cardboard box cartel settlement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It is believed that Amcor and Visy have agreed to settle a class action against them alleging losses arising from cartel conduct engaged in between the companies (previously the subject of an <a href="cases/visy2.html">ACCC action</a> in which Justice Heerey imposed a $36m penalty of Visy, noting that this was "by far, the most serious cartel case to come before the Court in the 30 plus years in which price fixing has been prohibited"). In an item in the Australian (<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/visy-amcor-settle-box-lawsuit/story-e6frg98x-1226018004494" target="_blank">Visy and Amcor settle box lawsuit</a>), Andrew Main notes speculation that the settlement may be inthe order of $150 million (others have speculated it may be in the order of $500million).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:19:51 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7112F92D-33B0-4CF5-A1D6-F33426BEA99D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Milk Wars hearings</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Public hearings continue today in the Senate's inquiry into the impact of supermarket price decisions on the dairy industry. Yesterday hearings were held in Melbourne. Today they are being held in Sydney and tomorrow in Canberra. Transcripts are not yet available, but will be posted on the <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/economics_ctte/dairy_industry_supermarket_2011/hearings/index.htm" target="_blank">inquiry web site</a>. There is no shortage of media on this one.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:19:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3061633A-F490-49E1-9568-2822F55531DB</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FOI information on price signalling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/foi.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Recently Treasury has released some documents regarding policies on bank competition and, in particular, price signalling. Key among them is a Treasury Executive Minute setting out Treasury's proposal for price signalling and information exchange laws and attaching some of the advice relied upon to develop the proposed model. Notably, it attaches economic advice provided by Dr Jill Walker (prior to her appointment as an ACCC Commissioner) in which Dr Walker recommends against per se prohibition of facilitating practices. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/foi.html#bankwalker">View FOI documents</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:00:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">EEA9D05C-405A-43D4-AE21-EB47A8B554FE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose single certifying body for attendant care standard</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose a single certifying body for attendant care standards. The proposed conduct was notified because of its potential to contravene s 47 (exclusive dealing). The ACCC accepts public benefit arguments, at least for the initial phase of the program. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/976223" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:59:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B8A77783-D0FD-4B9F-8B7D-68C0D656CD38</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow continuation of refrigerant produce stewardship scheme</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC proposes to grant authorisation to allow Refrigerant Reclaim Australia "to continue to operate a product stewardship scheme to recover ozone depleting and synthetic greenhouse gases (refrigerant). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/976076" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953514/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:59:22 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C2A91E2C-407C-4DFE-A337-21D43F4BB154</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC draft decision on AHA collective bargaining proposal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has made a draft decision proposing to allow Australian Hotels Association Divisions in all states and territories to collectively bargain with various wagering, broadcasting etc services providers. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/976079" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953514/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:58:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B63FE49E-9FBB-4476-9D8B-CF9BF2A4B3CB</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate drops Metcash inquiry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010metcash.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Senate Economics Reference Committee has released its final report on the proposed acquisition of the Franklins supermarket business by Metcash. It concluded that "[n]otwithstanding the significance of any competition issues associated with the proposed acquisition, the committee recognises this matter will be examined in detail through the judicial process. The committee believes this is an appropriate manner in which to test the arguments and resolve the matter." <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010metcash.html">View inquiry details</a>. See also Blair Speedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/senate-drops-accc-probe/story-e6frg8zx-1226014345186" target="_blank">Senate drops ACCC probe</a>' (The Australian, 2 March 2011)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:28:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8B3C6DF6-FFF5-4E25-904F-E11007E5DD87</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC monitoring speculation over Foxtel/Austar merger</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is "monitoring media speculation of a possible acquisition of Austar by   FOXTEL". <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975742/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">View merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:15:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75680E5F-53A5-48E8-B5BE-2FF2BA38BCC3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises concrete cartage owner drivers collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975828/fromItemId/142</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has "granted authorisation for owner drivers providing concrete cartage services to collectively bargain with Q-crete." View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975828/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/950224" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:14:47 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B0457DB7-3A42-4DB9-BD46-AF067E82E7D2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC invites submissions on Woolworths' proposed acquisition of The Cellarmasters Group</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975200/fromItemId/750991</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is inviting comments on the proposed acquisition, by Woolworths, of The Cellarmasters Group. Submissions due 22 March. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975200/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:14:31 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">74E74A82-BAC4-4CE0-B411-47B754B1DBAC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$4.2m price fixing penalty for foreign cartel</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court has ordered that APP Singapore and two other companies pay penalties of $4.2 m for fixing the price of photocopy paper and 'uncoated woodfree folio paper' supplied to Australian consumers. None of the meetings at which agreements were reached occurred in Australia. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/975295" target="_blank">View ACCC press release</a>. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2011singapore.html">View judgement</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:52:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E3AFBEC9-212D-4658-9184-165E66D25DAF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Milkonomics</title>
      <link>http://economics.com.au/?p=6756</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Prof Stephen King has a blog piece today attacking the claims that 'farmers will be ruined' by the milk wars. <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=6756" target="_blank">View blog post at Core Economics</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:42:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9AA23857-47DE-4596-82B0-C110276A7D05</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval for WA chicken growers collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to allow WA chicken growers to collectively bargain with processors. The ACCC claims this will provide stability for the industry. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/974882" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:30:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">024D80E1-A625-4C89-AF34-1E7FEFB93FB0</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows collective bargaining for Telstra shops</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authorisation for TLS Association Pty Ltd to collectively bargain with suppliers on behalf of Telstra licensed shops for five years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/974640" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/950346" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:29:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1C201F67-33EA-44CF-B4F6-FC7884490FE5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes re-authorisation of collective bargaining by elite swimmers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/955699" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to re-authroise the Australian Swimmers' Association Inc to collectively bargain with Swimming Austrlaia Ltd on behalf of members for a further ten years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/974309" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:29:24 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">335A1824-7762-4095-B353-B40091A937A8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Swan on exit fees</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[David Crowe and John Kehoe discuss the Treasury document warning about the 'unintended consequences' of placing a ban on exit fees in today's AFR ('Swan defiant on exit fee ban', p 5). In particular, Treasury (amongst others) warned that such a ban would lead the banks to seek to recover actual or potential losses by increasing interest rates or other fees. Swan claims that any attempt to lift other fees to make up for lost revenue would be met with regulatory crack down - presumably based on the 'unfair terms' and unconscionable conduct provisions of the new Australian Consumer Law (ACL), but this seems unlikely. Nevertheless, he seems convinced the 'reform' will promote competition (or at least convinced that the public will think that the reform will promote competitoin) and is charging ahead with its implementation - see further my <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/exit-fees/" target="_blank">blog post</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:35:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">852D6528-D17B-48E9-B33B-01BFE5A21746</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel book launch</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                '<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/book2011beatonwells.html">Australian Cartel Regulation</a>', by <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/beaton-wells-caron.html">Caron Beaton-Wells</a> and <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/fisse-brent.html">Brent Fisse</a>, was launched yesterday at an event hosted by <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/baxt-robert.html">Prof Bob Baxt AO</a>. The book was officially launched by <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/judges/heerey-peter.html">The Honourable Peter Heerey QC</a>, who also used the occasion to criticise the current approach to legislative reform in the area of competition policy - in particular, he contrasted the lengthy process that resulted in the new cartel laws with the ad hoc, populist and reactionary approach that has been a feature of recent changes, from the infamous <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2007tpla.html">Birdsville amendment</a> to the proposed price signalling laws. More information about the book can be found <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/book2011beatonwells.html">here</a>.
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:14:27 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8F64A704-F345-4D09-8AE6-467C5C8C4CE3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fortescue in court over Pilbara rail access</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Fortescue was in court again this week, this time in its bid to overturn the Tribunal's access decision which granted Fortescue only limited access to certain rail lines in the Pilbara owned by BHP and Rio (<a href="cases/fortescue.html">view decision</a>). Rio is challenging the Tribunal's decision to grant access to some lines. The appeal is being heard in Melbourne by Chief Justice Keane and justices Middleton and Mansfield. See, eg, Leonie Wood, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/fortescue-puffs-out-chest-on-rail-lines-20110221-1b2jx.html" target="_blank">Fortescue puffs out chest on rail lines</a>', SMH, 22 Feb 2011]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:51:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F01BD5FC-1A4A-4C42-B2B3-4D5965697608</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC exemption of gas project</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>Jonathan Barrett has an item on page 14 of today's AFR discusing the exemption granted by the ACCC to owners of the North West Shelf gas project. He notes that the ACCC did not seek input from Woodside Energy prior to granting the exemption. Woodside's chief executive, Don Voelte, has claimed that the exemption is both unnecessary and potentially costly for WA residents.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:51:09 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BDBCFE2E-A4C2-4CFA-8CF4-B6D576EE32C4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Milking the public'</title>
      <link>http://economics.com.au/?p=6726&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=milking-the-public</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A blog piece by Sam Wylie, 'Milking the public' discusses Ian McLeod (managing director of Coles Supermarkets) opinion piece in today's AFR regarding the current <a href="reports/2011milk.html">milk inquiry</a>. <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=6726&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=milking-the-public" target="_blank">View blog</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:50:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8C39AF5D-35C3-4336-B951-A638633CF904</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises Homeworkers Code of Practice</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/973327</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has re-authorsed the Homeworkers Code of Practice for two years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/973327" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952438" target="_blank">authorisation decision</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:17:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D118A24C-CA0D-4B3F-9E01-EE7E67F5E694</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Inquiry into Milk Price Wars</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#milk2</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                <p>Yes, another<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html" target="_blank"> inquiry</a>. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html#milk1">I noted on 26 January</a> that the opposition had called for an investigation over milk competition between Coles and Woolworths and now they have it. Independent senator, Nick Xenophon, announced the inquiry yesterday, noting that he understands 'consumers want cheap milk' but that consumers will suffer if the short term cuts mean 'the 'descruction of our dairy industry'. See <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/dailys/ds100211.pdf" target="_blank">Senate Hansard page 36</a>. The inquiry is likely to start in the second week of March and is supported by the opposition. It will include investigation into whether the price reduction is anti-competitive (because the Senators increasingly believe themselves more equipped than the ACCC for such an assessment). Labor has not supported the inquiry. </p>
                <p>For more details <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011milk.html">see my inquiry page</a>. For related news see, for example, AAP, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/xenophon-announces-milk-inquiry/story-e6frf7l6-1226003799732" target="_blank">Senate announces inquiry into supermarket milk wars</a>' (Herald Sun, 10 February); Sid Maher and Pia Akerman, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/farmers-urge-milk-price-revolt-against-coles/story-fn59niix-1226003966689" target="_blank">Farmers urge milk price revolt against Coles</a>' (The Australian, 11 February 2011); Michael Harvey, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/xenophon-announces-milk-inquiry/story-e6frf7l6-1226003984085" target="_blank">Senate announces inquiry into supermarket milk wars</a>' (Herald Sun, 11 February) and '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/10/3135721.htm" target="_blank">Labor rejects probe into milk price war</a>' (ABC, 10 February)</p>
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:12:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71D0B8E7-600C-4294-852C-B6B9D9EA855E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows Virgin Blue-Etihad alliance</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/971055</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has authorised an alliance between Virgin Blue and Etihad Airways for five years. The alliance relates to cooperation on joint pricing and scheduling of services. The ACCC considers it will promote competition and, given the airlines 'do not currently compete on any routes' it is 'unlikely to result in any anti-competitive detriments'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/971055" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944483" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:01:35 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">02D0DE1D-D821-4F29-80F7-2B60D4F57B0B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel talks about criminal cartel prosecution</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Olga Galacho's item, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/samuels-vow-i-will-get-cartels/story-fn6bn4mv-1225997082977" target="_blank">Samuel's vow: I will get cartels</a>' contains an interview with Samuel about future criminal cartel prosecutions and the ACCC's role generally, including this slightly spooky remark: 'Every day, every minute, even while you sleep, everything you do will be oversighted by the ACCC".]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:00:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6F84D4FC-67F5-42DD-A0B8-223BA40CAF4B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash merger news</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[An <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/grocery-rivals-keen-spectators-in-metcash-case-20110130-1a9oo.html" target="_blank">item by Elisabeth Sexton in the SMH today</a> discusses the interest of grocery rivals, Coles, Woolworths and Aldi, in the forthcoming (14 March) ACCC challenge to Metcash's proposed takeover of Franklins and discusses the ACCC's statement of claim.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:59:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E0971CA0-2025-4FBD-A1D1-35D27A6A7EBC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling submissions released</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The submissions made to the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011pricesignal.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No.1) 2011 (Exposure Draft Bill)</a> have now been published. Twenty-four submissions were made. <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?ContentID=1941&NavID=037" target="_blank">View submissions</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:59:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">43600B60-D483-4412-A072-445DAFF935DA</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Opposition calls for investigation over milk competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Yes, the opposition wants the ACCC to investigate Coles and Woolworths for their decision to vigorously compete on the price of milk (see, eg, AAP, '<a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/oppn-calls-in-watchdog-over-milk-debate-20110126-1a594.html" target="_blank">Oppn calls in watchdog over milk debate</a>'. The opposition considers such price 'slashing shameful'. Opposition agriculture spokesman John Cobb wants any inquiry to be 'fair dinkum' (claiming previous ACCC inqury into grocery retailing was simply a 'Labor ruse'). See also John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/milk-will-spill-in-spermarket-war/story-e6frg9if-1225994489010" target="_blank">Coles' milk price cut aimed at Woolies and Aldi, but the real victim will be processors</a>' (The Australian).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:57:53 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12744392-CB6E-4BE8-B53B-40F129F88DB7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More price signalling news</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                A few articles popping up over the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011pricesignal.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No.1) 2011 (Exposure Draft Bill)</a> are worth a look. See, eg, John Durie, '<a href="http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/top-stories/business-backlash-grows-on-governments-price-signalling-crackdown/story-e6frg12l-1225994712925" target="_blank">Business backlash gorws on government's price signalling crackdown</a>' (The Australian) (discussing a number of submissions, although one quote appears a tad wrong, claiming the LCA believes the laws (if introduced) should only prohibit disclosure "for the purpose of substantially increasing competition"! (fortunately <a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/documents/1941/PDF/Law_Council_of_Australia.pdf" target="_blank">their submission</a> does refer to lessening rather than increasing competition)); Terry McCrann, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/level-playing-field-samuel-style/story-e6frfh4f-1225994489531" target="_blank">Level playing field, Samuel-style</a>' (Herald Sun) (McCrann criticises Samuel' 'bizarre understanding of commercial reality' when it comes to price signalling); Peter Taylor, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/accc-tough-on-price-signals/story-e6frfh4f-1225994492233" target="_blank">ACCC tough on price signals</a>' (Herald Sun) and Jennifer Hewett, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/draft-bill-sends-on-price-signalling-may-end-up-with-unintended-consequences/story-e6frg9if-1225993868713" target="_blank">Draft bill on price signalling may have unintended consequences</a>' (The Australian).
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:57:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46961DCA-55AC-4767-AE68-B50A5AB39E4A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Woolworths complains about Bunnings</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Woolworths has lodged a complaint with the ACCC about the behaviour of Bunnings. It's hard not to be cynical about the timing when Woolworths is planning to open its own hardware stores to compete with Wesfarmers' Bunning stores; regardless, it will be intersting to watch. See, eg, James Thomson, '<a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/retail/20110125-woolworths-makes-complaint-against-bunnings-as-hardware-war-heats-up.html" target="_blank">Woolworths makes complaint against Bunnings as hardware war heats up</a>' (SmartCompany)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:57:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11A73D51-D748-4748-90BA-878B1317968F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by concrete cartage owner drivers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=950224" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation for owner drivers providing concrete cartage services to collectively bargain with Q-crete.'  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/969579" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:56:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BD317731-852E-4E5E-BEE6-6E61E783FD93</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jewellery trader offers refunds as part of an undertaking to the ACCC</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/969195</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Global Enerprises (Qld) Pty Ltd, trading as Allure Gold has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968951" target="_blank">provided undertakings to the ACCC</a> following concerns that Allure Gold had engaged in resale price maintenance by sending an email to retailers directing them not to sell products below a certain price. The undertaking includes provision of refund to customers or consumers who feel they have been misled as to composition. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/969195" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:18:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5AFF709F-8955-4810-A79F-0FDBC2655E5F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC consults on Viterra's proposed wheat port access arrangements 2011-2014</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/969064</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has commenced consultatoin on Viterra's propsed access arrangements which must be in place by 1 October 2011. The ACCC has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/wheat/" target="_blank">released an issues paper</a> - submissions due 4 March 2011. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/969064" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:18:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63E9B497-0214-42E7-9941-80034B65F98B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian Trade Practices Reporter renamed 'Australian Competition and Consumer Law Reporter'</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description>I received my latest ATP Reporter update to discover it is being re-named the Australian Competition and Consumer Law Reporter. Fortunately the 'Australian Trade Practices Reports' series (ATPR) will retain its name. CCH notes that "With more than 35 years of trusted case reporting on all areas of trade practices, competition and consumer judicial law, CCH is dedicated to the practical importance of maintaining citation consistency and continuity'. Good call. The Reporter will also be restructured; most notably, competition and consumer law commentary will each form their own separate volumes.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:34:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">DA5058E5-68AA-4ACE-8235-64C2CA838ACA</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC consults on ABA's proposed wheat port access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/969053</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC today began consultation on wehat port access arrangements proposed by Australian Bulk Alliance. ABA has submitted a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/964331" target="_blank">proposed access undertaking</a>. Submissions due 4 March. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/969053" target="_blank"> press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:30:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5F45E501-8874-4F20-A9EE-33CFE34CB27F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow collective bargaining for Telstra shops</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968959</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/950346/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">draft determination</a> proposing to grant authorisation (for five years) to TLSA to "collectively bargain with a range of suppliers on behalf of Telstra licenced shops." Submissions due by 4 February. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968959" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:25:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11B4D14A-CCA8-4580-82E9-1CC8BF3A2B14</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on Sleepyhead's proposed acquisition of Dunlop Foams</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968784</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued "a   <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968770" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> relating to proposed acquisitions involving   Wonderest Limited (trading as Sleepyhead) and Pacific Brands Limited   (Pacific Brands)." Submissions due by 4 February. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968784" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:24:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">AD020E92-624E-4DF3-9DCC-8E32F1D20B5C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed acquisition by InvoCare Ltd of Bledisloe Group Holdings</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968774</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968767" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition by InvoCare Limited of Bledisloe Group Holdings Pty Ltd. "InvoCare is the largest provider of funeral services and the largest   operator of private cemeteries and crematoria in Australia.  Bledisloe   operates a funeral directing business in Australia and owns cemeteries   and crematoria in Queensland. " Submissions due 4 February. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/968774" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:24:09 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0A33682A-43A0-4B87-9F27-A20326394699</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Central Queensland councils to conduct green waste tender</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will allow the Central Qld Local Government Association to conduct a regional tender for provision of green waste mulching services. Authorisation has been granted for five years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/967653" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/942306" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:23:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">09D1C890-CF64-4736-B4FE-F8748E4A97D2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banks irate over price signalling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2011durkin-pricesignalling.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Page 3 of The Australian Financial Review has an <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2011durkin-pricesignalling.html">item by Patrick Durkin</a> on the reaction to the government's proposed price signalling laws. Submissions on the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011pricesignal.html">Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No.1) 2011 (Exposure Draft Bill)</a> are due today.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:14:20 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7117F4DE-3B2A-412C-A809-B6E4DE8A832E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CCA consolidation now available</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A free compilation of the Competition and Consumer Act has now been published at ComLaw. It can be viewed <a href="http://www.comlaw.gov.au/comlaw%5Cmanagement.nsf/lookupindexpagesbyid/IP200401339?OpenDocument" target="_blank">here</a>. The new Australian Consumer Law is contained in Schedule 2 which is in Volume 3 of the Act. At 1,454 pages (or 1,314 excluding notes) be prepared to kill a few trees if you want to print it ...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:52:52 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">43AE5143-182C-4889-BD27-ACF17683F6B4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Welcome the Competition and Consumer Act 2010</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/</link>
      <description>The name change of the Trade Practices Act 1974 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 has now taken effect. This does not alter the substance of the competition law provisions of the Act (there are, however, substantial changes to the consumer laws with the Australian Consumer Law now taking full effect).</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 08:11:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9EFF9E6D-1F7F-4C51-B905-A9A1983B711D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC not to oppose pharmaceutical acquisition</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962900</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Sigma Pharmaceuticals Limited's Pharmaceutical Division by Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Limited on the basis that Aspen is providing an undertaking to sell certain brands to address the ACCC's competition concerns.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962900" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962875" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:55:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">EBB68BAC-0BC9-45CB-ABD7-4F305CE42F83</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft decision to authorise Virgin Blue-Eithad alliance</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962593</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to authorise an alliance between Virgin Blue and Etihad. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962593" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944483" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:56:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BA1BB288-8A16-4BA9-B5BB-CF938366B0F9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conditional authorisation for Virgin Blue-Air NZ alliance</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962581</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a determination granting conditional authorisation for three years for a Virgin Blue/Air NZ alliance in relation to flights between Australia and NZ. The 'conditions require the airlines to maintain and grow the number of seats flown on the routes where the ACCC has identified competition issues. The conditions are intended to restrict the ability of the Alliance to raise fares on these routes by limiting its capacity'.View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962581" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/927433" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:56:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0CF8697A-ADEB-4691-BD2F-7E9B4BBA5927</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise Homeworkers Code of Practice</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962407/fromItemId/142</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC proposes to re-authorise the Homeworkers Code of Practice (designed to ensure compliance with legislative requirements applying to homeworkers or outworkers) for two years. The code has been authorised since 2000. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962407/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952438" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:07:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D91E02B8-31E6-46F1-9617-4815776329BC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC clears proposed acquisition of ASX Limited  by Singapore Exchange Limited</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962113</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will not opposed the proposed acquisition of ASX by SGX. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962113" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962036" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:55:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6A644C04-04A4-457D-93BA-48A7BE48B8BC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases petrol report</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962278</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued its third report on the prices, costs and profits of unleaded petrol in Australia. It notes that "in 2009-10 Australia had the fourth cheapest retail petrol prices in the OECD." <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/962278" target="_blank">View report</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:01:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">AD8C73A4-B133-41DE-BF56-4AAB6246F072</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Name changes and fiddling</title>
      <link>http://www.thenewlawyer.com.au/article/Name-changes-and-fiddling-the-TPA-and-the-CCA/526543.aspx?utm_source=20101214&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=newsletters#</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Neat little <a href="http://www.thenewlawyer.com.au/article/Name-changes-and-fiddling-the-TPA-and-the-CCA/526543.aspx?utm_source=20101214&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletters#" target="_blank">article in The New Lawyer</a> by Michael Bradley, managing partner at Marque Lawyers, on some of the absurdities of the TPA/CCA.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:39:10 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48FF02DE-8E25-42B2-A930-44D1C0E8A1BC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v Black White Cabs Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1399 (14 December 2010)</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/2010cabs.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On 3 November Justice Finkelstein declared that Black and White Cabs had engaged in exclusive dealing as defined in <a href="legislation/provisions/1974tpa47.html" target="_blank">s 47(6)</a> and prohibited by <a href="legislation/provisions/1974tpa47.html">s 47(1)</a> by offering to supply and supplyint taxi operators taxi network services and the right to use taxi service licences on condition that taxi operators acquire electronic payment srevices from Cabcharge. His Honour's reasons for judgment are now available at <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/1399.html" target="_blank">AustLII</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:05:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E665A11C-AA8C-412F-850C-005C7D2B8F54</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartel Project releases survey report</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.cartel.law.unimelb.edu.au/" target="_blank">Cartel Project</a> team has released its extensive <a href="http://cartel.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/project-news/project-survey" target="_blank">survey report</a>. The survey of the Australian public related to the government’s decision to criminalise cartel conduct. The website notes that the "results of this survey are likely to be relevant to anyone interested in anti-cartel law enforcement, but will be of particular significance to policymakers, enforcement agencies, prosecutors, defence lawyers, judges and scholars researching this field." The full report runs to 374 pages with appendices (208 without) and is a 7.5MB download, but well worth it - for those wanting a quick overview, a 5 page executive summary is available for download.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:05:18 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11A7742F-962C-4137-956A-99B882BAA28A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Competition and consumer law - an overview for small business</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/guidelines/2010smallbusinessbooklet.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released (dated 9 December 2010) a <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/guidelines/2010smallbusinessbooklet.html">booklet outlining competition and consumer law for small business</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:59:47 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1EE4773B-75DF-4BB5-89BF-6FA822C15123</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New price signalling law proposal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011pricesignal.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[As part of the  '<a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/banking" target="_blank">Competitive and Sustainable Banking System package</a>', the Government has released an <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2011pricesignal.html">Exposure Draft Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No.1) 2011</a>. Submissions are invited and are due on 14 January 2011.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:22:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">861D32BE-DA1A-4987-8573-6ED086AA5289</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Swan announces banking reforms</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Treasurer, Wayne Swan, has announced the Government's banking reform package. It includes a number of measures, including banning exit fees and introducing price signalling laws. View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html" target="_blank">press release</a>. View the '<a href="http://www.treasury.gov.au/banking" target="_blank">Competitive and Sustainable Banking System package</a>'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:51:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4607B5F6-AB88-477A-9785-346D1BB62578</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wayne Swan to announce Bank Competition Reform plan tomorrow</title>
      <link>http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/bank-competition/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Treasurer Wayne Swan called a press conference today to announce that he would be announcing the Government's banking competition reform plan tomorrow. <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=transcripts/2010/130.htm&pageID=004&min=wms&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">View transcript</a>. View <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/bank-competition/" target="_blank">my blog post</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:02:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75385E27-2F4F-44F2-8B2E-188182DAB11A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Working Party Report on Criminal Penalties for Cartel Behaviour released</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2004criminal.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[As a result of a second FOI request by Brent Fisse, made possible by changes in FOI laws, the <strong>Working Party Report on Criminal Penalties for Cartel Behaviour</strong> is now publicly available for the first time. With the permission of the Commonwealth, the Report has been posted on <a href="http://www.brentfisse.com/" target="_blank">Brent Fisse's web site</a>. A link to the report and some further information is also available on my <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2004criminal.html">working party report page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:51:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">FEB0288B-C4EB-4EB2-9563-51501BD515C6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC initiates proceedings against Metcash</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has initiated proceedings against Metcash, seeking an injunction from the Federal Court against the proposed Franklins acquisition, alleging that the acquisition would substantially lessen competition in the NSW wholesale grocery sector. See, for example, Blair Speedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/accc-in-bid-to-block-purchase-of-franklins/story-e6frg8zx-1225967885365" target="_blank">ACCC in bid to block purchase of Franklins</a>' (The Australian, 9 December 2010) and Sikonathi Mantshantsha, '<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-08/australia-starts-process-to-stop-sale-by-pick-n-pay-update1-.html" target="_blank">Australia starts process to Stop Sale by Pick n Pay'</a> (Bloomberg, 9 December 2010).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:43:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2FD9F1FA-A443-4AB2-A8A2-50544FA4B718</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC clears potential acquisitions under NSW Energy Privatisation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose a number of potential acquisitions by Origin Energy Limited and AGL Energy Limited of assets being sold as part of the New South Wales Energy Privatisation. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/961089" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:50:46 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">EBC0F510-119F-4EF9-A9E5-D460B927FA0A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to introduce competition in transport in WA grain supply chain</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is proposing to revoke a notification by Cooperative Bulk Handling Ltd (CBH) allowing it to require growers who store grain in its   'up-country' storage facilities to also use its transport services. Comment is invited on the ACCC's draft revocation. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959985" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/832245" target="_blank">notification</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:50:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ED7F928-2A8C-4A90-BBAD-A42F312E4DDC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC denies authorisation for exclusive pilotage agreement</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959644</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC today denied authorisation for an exclusive pilotage services agreement at the Port of Brisbane, stating that it was "not convinced that the ... agreement delivers the public benefits [Brisbane Marine Pilots] claimed". View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959644" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/932622" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:39:22 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">21D5AC7F-33A9-4884-9F2D-29310BD89EB3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Wiggins Island coal producers to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959481</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has allowed various coal producers to collectively bargain with QR Network for access to its Moura and Blackwater rail systems which is necessary to transport coal to the new Wiggins Island Coal Export Terminal. The authorisation has been granted for 15 years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959481" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/937335" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:58:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2E0721B6-35B2-4ACE-AF55-F84D82C59829</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed acquisition of P&amp;N Beverages by Asahi</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959495</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a statement of issues on the proposed acquisition of P&N Beverages by Asahi Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd. Submissions are due by 20 December with final decision expected by 3 February. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959495" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944879" target="_blank">statement of issues</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:58:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B5C9D704-F9C2-4930-9141-CDF2CCCC5568</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed acquisition of Mobil assets</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959453</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a Statement of Issues on the proposed acquisition by Caltex of the Mobil assets at the Caltex-Mobil joint fuel terminal in Gladstone. Submissions are due by 23 December and the ACCC's final decision is expected by 27 January 2011. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/959453" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952054" target="_blank">statement of issues</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:57:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A1164093-219C-481F-94F7-673DA35B6D47</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v IGC Dorel Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1303</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Resale Price Maintenance - consent orders - penalties totalling $100,000 plus costs, orders not to engage in specified conduct and establishment of Trade Practices Compliance and training program. <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/1303.html" target="_blank">View judgment</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:44:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C9EF3F03-38F6-4AEB-887A-EA6458394D20</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash agrees not to proceed until ACCC files full proceedings</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[SMH reports that Metcash has agreed not to proceed with its proposed takeover of the Franklins grocery group on the basis that the ACCC will file full proceedings on or before 8 December. This will avoid the need for the ACCC to obtain an injunction. See '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/metcash-accc-truce-20101126-18at3.html" target="_blank">Metcash, ACCC truce</a>' (SMH, 27/11/2010). See also Blair Speedy, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/metcash-shelves-franklins/story-e6frg8zx-1225961710584" target="_blank">ACCC threat pushes Metcash to delay Franklins bid</a>' (The Australian, 27/11/2010).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:47:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3C583149-40E5-4085-967A-F7245E87D350</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New TPLJ out</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The latest issue of the <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/journaltplj.html">Trade Practices Law Journal</a> is now available. It includes a neat article by Melbourne Barrister, <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/truong-cam.html">Cam Truong</a>, on '<a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2010truong-markets.html">Transnational commerce and the problem of market definition</a>'. The author usefully examines the limitations of the market definition in <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/provisions/1974tpa4E.html">s 4E</a> of the Act and the difficulties it gives rise to in pleadings. He refers to a number of recent decisions (particularly Auskay v Qantas Airways) that have considered the issue in a 'global' context and identifies.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:06:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A9ECA372-C7D1-4AF2-A6FB-02E41C6767F8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel - Competition with compassion</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2010samuel-costello.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On Wednesday night Graeme Samuel delivered the 2010 Costello Lecture, 'Competition with Compassion- Australia's Economic Success', in Melbourne - it is <a href="http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/readingroom/2010samuel-costello.html" target="_blank">now available online</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:06:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45B9F698-CA11-446D-910B-C1060869CABF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ergas on public policy</title>
      <link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/aussie-public-policy-dodgy-dodgy-dodgy/story-e6frg6zo-1225961147395</link>
      <description><![CDATA[a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/ergas-henry.html">Henry Ergas</a> has a <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/aussie-public-policy-dodgy-dodgy-dodgy/story-e6frg6zo-1225961147395" target="_blank">fun little op-ed in the Australian today</a>, highlighting his nominations for the 2010 'Dodgie' awards 'for <br />
              confused economics in the service of poor public policy' with several competition-related nominations.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:05:23 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">DD34EDD6-6E70-47CA-8CB9-60342CCF21D9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash Senate Inquiry web site now available</title>
      <link>http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/ACCC_Franklins_2010/index.htm</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2010metcash.html" target="_blank">Metcash Senate Inquiry web page</a> is now available. Labelled, the 'Inquiry into the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) Franklins decision' (yes, it avoids mention of 'Metcash'), it sets out the following terms of reference:</p>
                <blockquote>
                  <p> 	
                    "On 23 November 2010 the Senate referred to this committee for investigation the decision of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to oppose the proposed acquisition of the Franklins supermarket business by Metcash Trading Limited, with particular reference to:
                    (a) the basis of the ACCC decision to oppose the proposed purchase;
                    (b) the competition impacts of the decision at the retail and wholesale levels;
                    (c) whether the Franklins’ distribution warehouses, supplying eight franchised stores, could be regarded as an independently sustainable wholesale business; and
                    (d) any other related matters."</p>
                </blockquote>
<p>Submissions are invited and are due by 29 November 2010 (presumably anyone who already submitted to the ACCC's more appropriate competition inquiry into the proposed merger could re-submit here if they so desired). The report date is 17 December. Clearly a group of non-competition/economics expert Senators can come up with a well considered report on complex economic/competition issues in much less time than it took the experts at the ACCC. Let's not all hold our breath.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:21:13 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41696438-1B09-469F-A1D6-15801A55DB3F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN - Competition aspects</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                Yesterday the Government released it's <a href="http://resources.news.com.au/files/2010/11/24/1225960/243308-nbn-business-case.pdf" target="_blank">NBN business case summary</a>. The summary is discussed in an op-ed by <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/" target="_blank">CEDA</a>'s <a href="http://www.ceda.com.au/about/leadership-team.aspx" target="_blank">Michael Porter</a> in today's AFR (Michael Porter, 'CompetitionBites the Dust' (AFR, 25/11/2010, p 67)) in which he criticises the anti-competitive featrures of the NBN plan as worse than expected. See also John Durie's '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/share-the-blame-on-nbn-impasse/story-e6frg8zx-1225960454687" target="_blank">Share the blame on NBN impasse</a>' (The Australian, 25/11/2010) (observing that: 'It's hard not to be cynical and indeed disturbed about the state of national politics right now with independents doing deals that amount to zero and the likes of Nationals senator Ron Boswell setting himself up as an independent arbiter of competition law decisions.) and Terry McCrann, '<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/terry-mccranns-column/broadband-fairytale-nbns-latest-chapter/story-e6frfig6-1225960519762" target="_blank">Broadband fairytale NBN's latest chapter</a>' (Herald-Sun, 25/11/2010) and Malcolm Maiden, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/nbn-co-looks-ahead--but-not-that-far--to-lay-out-the-networks-numbers-20101124-187dr.html" target="_blank">NBN Co looks ahead - but not that far - to lay out the network's numbers</a>' (SMH, 25/11/2010), amongst plenty of others.
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:15:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F5BF4999-B71F-4CD4-925F-061BF5871632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash Senate Inquiry</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On Tuesday the Senate, at the instigation of Nationals Senator Ron Boswell (and backed by independent senators Nick Xenophon and Steve Fielding), referred the ACCC's decision to oppose the Metcash purchase of Franklins supermarkets to the Senate Economics Committee (see <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/dailys/ds231110.pdf" target="_blank">Senate Hansard</a>, 23/11/2010 at p 37). Senator Bosewell received $30,000 in election donations from Metcash, but has denied it influenced his decision, stating: 'Any inference that a campaign donation might influence my role as a senator is wrong' (see Steve Lewis and Michael Madigan, '<a href="http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/senator-ron-boswell-lobbies-for-company-that-donated-to-his-election-campaign/story-e6freon6-1225960462795" target="_blank">Senator Ron Boswell lobbies for company that donated to his election campaign</a>', The Courier Mail, 25/11/2010). Regardless of the motivation, the referral is worrying - as Elizabeth Knight has rightly observed (<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/senators-back-off-grocery-dispute-belongs-in-court-20101123-185q4.html" target="_blank">SMH, 24/11/2010</a>), 'It is not up to Boswell or any party to undermine the decision of any independent regulator. This is a poor precedent. ... the Federal Court will be the appropriate and impartial arbiter of any appeal under trade practices law'.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:43:14 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2F47331D-34F8-4AEF-B692-5BA16B02F6B6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Metcash to defy ACCC</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                Following the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/956978" target="_blank">ACCC's announcement</a> that it would oppose Metcash's takeover of Franklins, <a href="http://www.metcash.com/files/dmfile/2010.11.23-ProposedAcquisitionofFranklins.pdf" target="_blank">Metcash has announced</a> it will defy the regulator and proceed with the transaction. This is the first such challenge since the Toll Holdings showdown in 2006 (which was resolved with undertakings) and AGL, which was successful in its Federal Court challenge (see <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/agl.html">AGL case</a>). Watch this space. See Supratim Adhikari, '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Metcash-ACCC-Franklins-Ten-Packers-Murdoch-Rinehar-pd20101124-BGR9L?OpenDocument&src=sph" target="_blank">Metcash mettle</a>' (Business Spectator, 24/11/2010), Rebecaa Urban, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/metcash-ready-to-take-on-the-watchdog-accc/story-e6frg8zx-1225959738250" target="_blank">Metcash ready to take on th watchdog ACCC</a>' (The Australian, 24/11/2010) and John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/metcash-chief-andrew-reitzer-defies-accc-ruling-on-franklins/story-e6frg9if-1225959692143" target="_blank">Metcash chief Andrew Reitzer defies ACCC ruling on Franklins</a>' (The Australian, 24/11/2010). See also Sue Mitchell, 'Metcash to defy ACCC over Franklins' (AFR, 24/11/2020, p 50)
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:47:25 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8C48DFAB-A667-473B-AFBE-92899600C3E2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC announces domestic benchmarking approach to transmission pricing</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/957966</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced its approach to transmission pricing in a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/923575" target="_blank">Position Paper</a> released today. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/957966" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:42:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B1D32DD4-ED99-4DD1-8A60-2B84F41717ED</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cross appointments between ACCC and NZCC</title>
      <link>http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2010/006.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=djb&amp;Year=&amp;DocType</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer David Bradbury and New Zealand Commerce Minister Simon Power have announced cross-appointments between the ACCC and the New Zealand Commerce Commission. <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/experts/walker-jill.html">Dr Jill Walker</a> will join the NZCC as an associate member. NZCC Chair, Dr Mark Berry, has been appointed an associate member of the ACCC. Each have been appointed for a three year term from 1 December 2010 - 30 November 2013. View <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2010/006.htm&pageID=003&min=djb&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">media release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:10:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">164F0411-D772-4610-AC8D-BB8FAF4A43DC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow Central Queensland green waste tender</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/957738</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft authorisation decision proposing to allow the Central Qld Local Government Association, on behalf of its member councils, 'to conduct a regional tender for the provision of green waste mulching services.' View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/957738" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/942306" target="_blank">authorisation register</a> (including draft determination).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:54:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8A514CF6-2899-48A1-BB03-70F9CB95D746</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition and Consumer (Price Signalling) Amendment Bill 2010</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2010pricesignalling.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Mr Billson presented the <a href="legislation/2010pricesignalling.html">Competition and Consumer (Price Signalling) Amendment Bill 2010</a> at 10.26am. An explanatory memorandum was presented and statement made - Bill was read for a first time at 10.37am. <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr4491_first%2F0000%22" target="_blank">View the bill</a>. View the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fems%2Fr4491_ems_83739b58-c13f-4bfd-883c-b411b2e1a766%22" target="_blank">explanatory memorandum</a>. View <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr4491%22" target="_blank">bill homepage</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:43:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83B71229-1B64-4D69-94AD-C95E1A8B7665</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Price signalling - opposition bill expected</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The opposition's price signalling bill is expected to be introduced today. Plenty of media: AAP, <a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/opposition-moves-on-price-signalling-20101122-182wh.html" target="_blank">Opposition Moves on Price Signalling</a> (SMH, 22/11/2010), Glenda Korporaal, <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/bank-reform-dangerous-munchenberg/story-e6frg8zx-1225958014863" target="_blank">Bank 'reform' dangerous: Munchenberg</a> (The Australian, 22/11/2010), AAP, <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad-application/opposition-bill-thought-bubble/story-fn6bn4mv-1225958012465" target="_blank">'Opposition bill 'thought bubble'</a> (Herald Sun 22/11/2010) and plenty more. More to follow when bill released.  According to today's House Program, the Competition and Consumer (Price Signalling) Amendment Bill 2010 will be presented by Mr Billson (Dunkley) (probably around 10.30am) accompanied by a statement (10 minutes allowed). A second reading to be made an order of the day for the next sitting.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:38:19 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1DA98AD8-286C-4724-A2CF-F671A00212FE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treasurer Wayne Swan discusses price signalling laws with Laurie Oakes</title>
      <link>http://www.treasurer.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=transcripts/2010/123.htm&amp;pageID=004&amp;min=wms&amp;Year=&amp;DocType=</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Treasurer Wayne Swan discussed price signalling laws with Laurie Oakes today.  The discussion was prompted by the fact that the Opposition will tomorrow move its price signalling bill. Swan responded: </p>
                <blockquote>
                  <p>'I haven't seen this bill as yet, but when it comes to pricing signalling I've been working with our regulator, the ACCC, on this issue for over six months. It's a complex area and it's a difficult area, and what it requires is detailed assessment, drafting of legislation and accuracy. So, you can't just have a thought bubble and read the paper and see that Government has been talking to the ACCC about price signalling and produce a bill. Any bill in this area has to be based on the very firm and accurate advice of a regulator. I've not seen it, but what I do know is that there would have to be a thorough assessment of the drafting of this bill before I could even consider what we might do with it because the Government, in this area, is developing a new wave of competition reforms of which price signalling is part, and you can only do this in a methodical, well considered way, and that hasn't been happening with what the Opposition's been doing. Crass populism doesn't work in this area.'  </p>
                </blockquote>
<p>References were also made to the Government's proposed reforms, but they were light on detail. <a href="http://www.treasurer.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=transcripts/2010/123.htm&pageID=004&min=wms&Year=&DocType=" target="_blank">View transcript</a>.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:06:19 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A81F67A6-A832-49DF-8F91-F38C5237D011</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cabcharge decision published</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/cases/cabcharge2010.html</link>
      <description>The decision of the Justice Finkelstein in the Federal Court relating to the Cabcharge misuse of market power conduct (see news 24 September) has now been published.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:31:20 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7F2FDF41-DA13-47D0-B8FD-459E3CC0F690</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes Metcash proposed acquisition of Franklins</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/956978</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will opposed the proposed acquisition of Franklins supermarkets by Metcash. Graeme Samuel stated: 'Central to the ACCC's concerns is that the proposed acquisition is   likely to result in a substantial lessening of competition through the   removal of Metcash's closest and only genuine competitor for the   wholesale supply of packaged groceries in NSW'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/956978" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/956971" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:16:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3C30E6F6-4661-4239-8E53-660DF21CEFFF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Even more on price signalling</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[With Parliament resuming today and the Liberal Party set to give notice of a private member's bill targetting price signalling, there's a lot of buzz about the nature and effect of any proposed price signalling laws to target banks. Notably, Katie Lahey of the BCA has an item in The Australian (<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/economy-could-become-roadkill-in-new-rush-to-regulation/story-e6frg6zo-1225953461059" target="_blank">Economy could become roadkill in new rush to regulation</a>) and there are several items in today Australian Financial Review (Swan pressured on bank reforms', pp 1 and 4; Laura Tingle, 'Little room on the left for Labor', p 5).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:43:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F47D1E86-5D84-4E5F-A390-26DED50DB5D3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises port truck access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/955812</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has confirmed its previous draft determination and has authorised DP World Australia Ltd and Patrick Stevedores Operations Ltd to give preferential treatment to truck carriers engaging in dual runs at the port of Fremantle. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/955812" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/936500" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:40:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0CCF364F-BE52-44F4-B8C6-E2A05C9C5D89</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to rethink Singapore bid for ASX</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The Australian Financial Review reports today on the ACCC's investigation of the Singapore Exchange's bid for ASX. See George Liondis, 'ACCC rethinks Singapore bid for ASX' (AFR, 11/11/10, page 5)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:40:15 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6D5C6096-261A-4590-8265-2BB508365B66</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on proposed price signalling laws</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The Australian Financial Review reported today on proposed new rules to allow the ACCC to use its coercive powers under s 155 whenever it suspects price signalling has occurred (rather than waiting until it suspects competitors have agreed to collude). The proposal does not appear to be restricted to any particular industry. It is not clear what impact this will have in isolation - the current law still requires collusion before contravention occurs - but the proposed new price signalling powers would be just one part of a package of reforms. See Matthew Drummond, 'Bank, petrol chiefs face ACCC grilling' (AFR, 9/11/2010, pages 1 and 48) (not freely available online)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:06:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49AAD50D-B658-47A4-A047-47D9AFF49A04</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases container stevedoring report</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/955361</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has called for more competition to drive increased investment and productivity at container ports. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/955361" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/955354" target="_blank">report</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:11:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11E574F1-313D-43D2-A264-41B873F9A14A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Swan announces work on price signalling laws for banks ... again</title>
      <link>http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/banking-competition/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In an <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=economicnotes/2010/036.htm&pageID=012&min=wms&Year=&DocType=4" target="_blank">economic note</a> released today, Treasurer Wayne Swan stated that the Government is in the process of developing a 'new banking competition package', one part of which involves 'working closely with the ACCC to carefully and methodically design new laws to prevent price signalling'. This is not really news, but he does also indicate that more will be announced shortly on this issue. View my <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/banking-competition/" target="_blank">blog post</a> on this issue.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 13:55:08 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B354D1EB-31F3-44E9-A96D-171766D0CF49</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barriers to entry, expansion and exit in retail banking</title>
      <link>http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2010/114-10</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The UK OFT has released a report: 'Review of Barriers to entry, expansion and exit in retail banking' (November 2010). The review was launched in 2010 'to identify any obstacles blocking firms from entering the sector or from successfully competing against existing firms, as well as factors preventing inefficient firms from exiting the market and being replaced by more efficient ones'.  View <a href="http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2010/114-10" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/markets-work/othermarketswork/review-barriers/" target="_blank">review home page</a>. View  <a href="http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/personal-current-accounts/oft1282" target="_blank">report</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:40:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">231BA837-D0CD-4444-B7CF-E0B52A2570DC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bank competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There are a few op-eds popping up about the recent attacks on banks by both parties. See, for example, Michal Pascoe, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/bank-mania-abandons-market-faith-20101105-17g8q.html" target="_blank">Bank mania abandons market faith</a>' (SMH, 5/11/2010), Simon Benson, '<a href="http://www.news.com.au/money/interest-rates/bank-bosses-could-face-heavy-penalties-if-collusion-on-rates-proved/story-e6frfmn0-1225948096988" target="_blank">Bank bosses could face heavy penalties if collusion on rates proved</a>' (News.com.au, 5/11/2010) (suggesting a private member's bill from Mr Hockey will appear within three weeks) and Siobhain Ryan and Joe Kelly, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/the-coalition-steals-a-march-on-banking-reform/story-fn59niix-1225948029757" target="_blank">The Coalition steals a march on banking reform</a>' (The Australian, 5/11/2010).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:26:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B2C6D10E-6901-4A49-9597-9D358DEC6C85</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Black &amp; White Cabs to pay $120,000 penalty for third line forcing</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/954784</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Justice Finkelstein in the Federal Court has ordered that Black and White Cabs pay $120,000 for requiring some taxi operators to exclusively use Cabcharge Payment systems for electronic payments in breach of third line forcing laws. The conduct had been admitted and penalties were agreed and incorporated a discount for a plea before trial. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/954784" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:07:29 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">909198C3-93E3-4D2B-B48E-CB06408F6FAA</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants conditional authorisation for Generic Medicines Industry Association's Code of Practice</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/954565</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted conditional authorisation to the Generic Medicines Industry Association's Code of Practice 2nd edition for three years. The conditions are designed to 'provide greater transparency around the relationship between the manufacturers of generic medicines and pharmacists'.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/954565" target="_blank">press release</a>.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/921644" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:55:00 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">756F057E-3545-4766-A7ED-F3F109F87D0B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC seeks price signal law</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description>The Financial Review reports (pages 1 and 8) that the ACCC has asked the Treasury to draft a new law to prohibit price signalling.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:11:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">059CFE70-3210-4123-9E6C-06D0DB9B1614</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coalition to prepare price signalling bill</title>
      <link>http://www.smh.com.au/business/hockey-steps-up-fight-with-big-banks-20101029-177m0.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Shadow Minister for Competition, Bruce Billson, has indicated that the Coalition is preparing a private member's bill to outlaw 'price signalling'. The Coalition hopes to win support from the Greens and independents. View Lenore Taylor, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/hockey-steps-up-fight-with-big-banks-20101029-177m0.html" target="_blank">Hockey steps up fight with big banks</a>' (SMH, 30/10/2010)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:08:48 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">01A31AAB-EA3E-452C-9F19-92752376BD2B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC releases Annual Report 2009-2010</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953971</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released its <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953971" target="_blank">Annual Report</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:03:09 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">208549E2-2DBB-40A8-8909-33B2A98F8CF6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition within the Australian Banking Sector</title>
      <link>http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/banking_comp_2010/index.htm</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Senate Economics Committee web site now includes details of the inquiry. See <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/banking_comp_2010/index.htm" target="_blank">Inquiry home page</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:54:32 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">DE5EC9E9-2187-4FC7-95AE-22FC7A111E91</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interim authorisation granted for TWU collective bargaining</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953818</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted interim authorisation to allow the Transport Workers' Union to collectively bargain on  behalf of participating concrete cartage owner drivers in Qld. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953818" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/950224" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:10:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D07D3879-0602-47EA-973C-BAF07947E595</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bank inquiry confirmed</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Senate has voted to hold an inquiry into banking competition and fees. The referral to the Economics References Committee was made by Senators Xenophon and Bushby. The Senate is due to report by 31 March 2011. View <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/dailys/ds281010.pdf" target="_blank">Senate Hansard</a> (pages 14-15). See also '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Senate-to-hold-banking-inquiry-pd20101028-AN28U?opendocument&src=rss" target="_blank">Senate to hold banking inquiry</a>' (Business Spectator, 28/10/10). See also '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/bank-battle-heats-up-20101028-174i9.html?from=smh_sb" target="_blank">Bank Battle Heats Up</a>' (SMH, 28/10/10)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:55:43 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B156EA3D-3AE0-4617-8745-36FCE4D190EC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inquiry into bank competition likely</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A Senate inquiry into banking competition looks likely after Senator Nick Xenophon joined with the Liberal party to call for the inquiry. The proposed terms of reference include the 'current level of competition between bank and non-bank providers' and any 'policies, practices and strategies that may enhance competition in banking, including legislative change'. See, eg, '<a href="http://www.bankingday.com/nl06_news_selected.php?act=2&stream=1&selkey=10733&hlc=2&hlw=" target="_blank">Liberals, Xenophon drive towards new Senate banking Inquiry</a>' (Banking Day, 28/10/10) and '<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Withdraw-guarantee-for-big-banks-Hockey-AMQNA?OpenDocument&src=hp11" target="_blank">Withdraw guarantee for big banks: Hockey</a>' (Business Spectator, 28/10/10)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:32:50 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BFB09EF7-EC38-4B9D-8713-B9F9AE436874</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorisation granted for Agsafe industry stewardship program</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953650</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authorisation to Agsafe to continue to enforce the Agsafe Code of Conduct for an additional three years. This seeks to ensure safe storage, handling, transport and distribution of agricultural and veterinary chemicals. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953650" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/931489" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:32:27 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00E176AB-2C6E-4308-B87E-F6F66562D052</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed pharmaceutical acquisition</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953576</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=MER10+3131.pdf&trimFileTitle=MER10+3131.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=953701" target="_blank">Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed acquisition of Sigma Pharmaceuticals' Pharmaceutical Division by Aspen Pharmacare Holdings. Submissions are invited and due by 11 November 2010. Final decision due 25 November. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/953576" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/945489" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:24:06 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">714AB2C2-7E28-482D-AD2B-038DEF22BC04</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel speaks about price signalling between banks, Packer's acquisition of share in TEN and the NBN</title>
      <link>http://www.abc.net.au/rn/breakfast/stories/2010/3046947.htm</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On Radio National breakfast this morning ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, was asked about price signalling between banks, the ACCC's plans to review James Packer's acquisition of an interest in the Ten Network and about the ACCC's roll in the implementation of the NBN. Samuel also indicated that he didn't see any competition concerns in the proposed ASX merger witht he Singapore Exchange. <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/rn/breakfast/stories/2010/3046947.htm" target="_blank">Listen to the interview or read the transcript  here</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:23:55 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A5042C70-C840-40FB-BC32-A9416B7D3D51</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interview with Graeme Samuel</title>
      <link>http://www.smh.com.au/business/villain-or-consumer-champion-20101022-16xti.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Adele Ferguson and Ben Butler report today on an interview with Graeme Samuel about his time as ACCC chief - it's worth a read - the article is '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/villain-or-consumer-champion-20101022-16xti.html" target="_blank">Villain or consumer champion?</a>' appearing in the SMH today.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:42:49 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6A5944B1-3078-49B2-9F7F-DFAF143DD4AC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to look into Packer's raid on ten</title>
      <link>http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/74596/20101021/accc-investigates-packer-s-investment-in-ten.htm</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has indicated it will examine James Packer's investment in the TenNetwork to see if it raises competition concerns.
                  Key concern surrounds fears Packer may axe One HD (Ten's digital sports channel). </p><p>See, eg, Tim Dick, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/accc-to-probe-packers-ten-raid-20101021-16w3r.html" target="_blank">ACCC to probe Packer's Ten raid</a>' (The Age, 22/10/2010), '<a href="http://www.finnewsnetwork.com.au/archives/finance_news_network16086.html" target="_blank">ACCC to investigate Ten share raid</a>' (Finance News Network, 22/10/2010) and Christine Jared-Perrin, '<a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/74596/20101021/accc-investigates-packer-s-investment-in-ten.htm" target="_blank">ACCC Investigates Packer's investment in Ten</a>' (International Business Times, 21/10/2010)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:32:59 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">092391C0-EBF3-4D67-85A3-2EBD11D22645</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICN Cartel Workshop materials available</title>
      <link>http://icncartel2010.stage.ac/materials.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Materials from the ICN's Cartel Workshop in Yokohama earlier this month are now available, including a presentation from Caron Beaton-Wells entitled: 'Cartel Criminalisation as Cultural Change: A report from findings of a survey of the Australian public' - the findings are worth a look.  There is also a presentation from Ayman Guirguis of Blake Dawson entitled: 'Cartels: Early Court Resolution in Australia. The Experience - The Challenge' which is also worth a look. <a href="http://icncartel2010.stage.ac/materials.html" target="_blank">View materials here</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:48:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CCA32EC2-1DFE-4BF2-9631-59A665B726E7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Chairman speaks to Senate Estimates Committee</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, appeared before the Senate Estimates Committee yesterday to face questions over a perceived conflict of interest between his business interests and his role as ACCC chairman airising out of the proposed NAB/AXA merger (see eg Richard Gluyas, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/samuel-faces-questions-on-direct-factory-outlet-decisions/story-e6frg8zx-1225941408454" target="_blank">Samuel faces questions on Direct Factory Outlet decisions</a>, 21/10/2010). Samuel told the committee he acted promptly in removing himself from involvement in the merger review once a potentialc onflict of interest was identified (see, g, RIchard Gluyas, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/i-acted-promptly-samuel-tells-senate-estimates/story-e6frg8zx-1225941971789" target="_blank">I acted promptly, Samuel tells Senate estimates</a>', 22/10/2010). See also Clancy Yeates, '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/samuel-defends-his-use-of-blind-trust-20101021-16w41.html" target="_blank">Samuel defends his use of 'blind trust'</a>', 22/10/2010.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:22:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B85F1AFF-ACCE-4A16-9FD1-04345F6173B2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed acquisition of Centrel by BP Australia</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952800</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=MER10+2953.pdf&trimFileTitle=MER10+2953.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=952790" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> in respect of the proposed acquisition of Centrel Pty Ltd by BP Australia Pty Ltd. Submissions invited and due by 5 November; final decision of ACCC deferred until 18 November 2010. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952800" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944376" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:31:33 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CC1682C1-9661-477B-A46F-38F739891DE7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC invites comments on POI to NBN</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952797</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952292" target="_blank">discussion paper</a> on the number and location of initial Points of Interconnection (POI) for the National Broadband Network that will best meet the long-term interests of end users. A consultation period will follow - submissions due by 8 November. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952797" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952292" target="_blank">discussion paper</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:20:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">717B2CCE-9D40-4927-B0D5-6BBA7A57177F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ergas: Shield protects NBN from competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Henry Ergas has an item in the Australian today, 'Shield protects NBN from competition' that is worth a look - it's sure to anger an <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/10/21/3044107.htm" target="_blank">already angered Senator Conroy</a>. View <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/shield-protects-nbn-from-competition/story-e6frg6zo-1225941393812" target="_blank">Henry Ergas, 'Shield protects NBN from competition'</a>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:48:42 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30A2DC55-5E03-4DD5-8E1F-5E1D5ACF0F3A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telecommunications bill</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                <p>The Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2010 was introduced into the House of Representatives today.  According to the<a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fems%2Fr4479_ems_414563d1-3fab-47c3-9885-735d52dd5c47%22" target="_blank"> explanatory memorandum</a>, the bill has three primary parts: "addressing Telstra’s vertical and horizontal
                  integration; streamlining the access and anti-competitive conduct regimes; and strengthening
                  consumer safeguard measures such as the Universal Service Obligation (USO), the Customer
                  Service Guarantee (CSG) and priority assistance." This will involve, amongst other things, amendments to Parts XIB and XIC of the TPA (soon to be renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010). <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr4479%22" target="_blank">View bill</a>. </p>
                <p>There is plenty of media on this - for example, see Clancy Yeates, <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor-launches-fresh-broadband-bill-push-20101020-16u87.html?autostart=1" target="_blank">Labor launches fresh broadband bill push</a> (The Age 21/10/2010),  Lucy Battersby, '<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/accc-weighs-regulating-broadband-20101020-16u9j.html" target="_blank">ACCC weighs regulating broadband</a>' (The Age, 21/10/2010) and '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/telstra-calls-for-a-quick-breakup-20101020-16u9l.html" target="_blank">Telsta calls for a quick break-up</a>' (SMH, 21/10/2010)</p>
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:48:01 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">131D6ABC-5BBB-43D9-A25F-49658C549299</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed acquisition of Bell Bay sawmill by Gunns</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will not oppose this proposed acquisition of the Bell Bay sawmill business by Gunns Limited. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952617" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952577" target="_blank">meger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:47:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72EDC2DE-80D9-4AEC-843E-B0CFF60F2D19</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts court enforceable undertakings from St Vincent's private anaesthetists</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has accepted court enforceable understakings from St Vincent's Private Hospital Sydney and its Department of Anaesthesia over alleged anti-competitive arrangements between the anaesthetists. This has involved an arrangement for allocating between themselves all permanent anaesthetic work at the hospital. The undertakings provide that the department will no longer allocate permanent anaesthesia work between themselves, with the Hospital to be responsible for the allocation. VIew <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952591" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/952480" target="_blank">undertakings register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:47:07 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">220EE5E9-53A2-43EA-A985-CFEC31612A69</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Six Principles for Limiting Government-Facilitated Restraints on Competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                In light of the debate over the NBN and the recent announcement that a <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/no-nbn-price-war-despite-competition-20101015-16ngy.html" target="_blank">uniform price will be applied to the NBN</a>, it's worth revisiting the 2007 article by Michal Gal and Inbal Faibish, 'Six Principles for Limiting Government-Facilitated Restraints on Competition', which has recently been made <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1683378" target="_blank">available on SSRN</a>. <br /><br />The authors note, relevantly, that 'regulation may also address distributional issues or other broad social goals. For example, where competition will not ensure universal service, and such service is considered to be in the public
interest, regulatory intervention may be warranted. Regulation thus often enables the reconciliation of efficiency and equity considerations.' (footnote omitted). <br /><br />In assessing whether the regulation is warranted in any given case, six principles are then proposed - the first is that the competition authority should play an important role in ensuring the legislator 'is aware of all relevant competitive considerations when if formulates the regulatory scheme.' <br /><br /><a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1683378" target="_blank">View the full article here</a>.
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:46:27 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1551A28F-0AE5-440E-85F6-69130E7ABA49</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BHP and Rio dissolve joint venture proposal</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto announced yesterday that they had 'reluctantly agreed to dissolve the proposed joint venture' worth US$116billion because it had 'become increasingly apparent that regulatory approvals [were] unlikely to be achieved.' The proposal involved the establishment a production joint venture covering both companies' Iron Ore assets in Western Australia. Regulators who expressed disaproval include the <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/45&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">European Commission</a>, the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item.phtml?itemId=920568&nodeId=51408869fd0d84ac5d70d26c19958375&fn=%20BHP%20Billiton%20Ltd%20and%20Rio%20Tinto%20Ltd%20-%20joint%20venture%20in%20Western%20Australian%20iron%20ore%20production%20-%2025%20March%202010.PDF" target="_blank">ACCC</a>, the Japan FTC, Korea FTC and, recently, the <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/bhprio-joint-venture-falls-foul-of-german-watchdog-20101015-16njt.html" target="_blank">German Federal Cartel Office</a>. View <a href="http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/investorsMedia/news/2010/bhpBillitonAndRioTintoTerminateTheIronOreProductionJointVenture.jsp" target="_blank">statement by BHP Billison</a>. View reports in the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d44e2fc2-dae3-11df-a5bb-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=rss" target="_blank">Financial Times</a>, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE69G10N20101018" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304410504575560103227504276.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/business/items/201010/s3041782.htm" target="_blank">ABC Lateline</a> and the <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/late-night-call-ends-iron-ore-epic/story-e6frg8zx-1225940387748" target="_blank">Australian</a>.
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:29:17 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B7BAAB12-89E4-49CD-B154-6189CDC5B4A1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gans - How much will NBN violate competition laws?</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Joshua Gans has an interesting blog piece on the competition law implications of the NBN. <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=6324" target="_blank">View blog</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:28:41 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49CEDD45-AA0D-4151-AD17-B3801F11A6E2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK announces proposed merger of competition functions of OFT and Competition Commission</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has announced a proposal to bring together the Competition Commission and competition functions of the OFT into a single competition and markets authority. View <a href="http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/detail.aspx?NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=415972&SubjectId=2" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/consumer-issues" target="_blank">statement of Vince Cable, Secretary of State for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:57:57 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">158CB460-9E49-4721-8118-6695863A92E6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBN debate continues</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull has delivered a speech to the CommsDay Congress in Melbourne in which he discussed the proposed NBN; he devotes a section to 'competition'. He claims, among other things, that: "If the Government were serious about competition then it would not   compel Telstra to shut down its copper network and migrate its customers   to the NBN. And it certainly would not contract to prevent Telstra and   Optus from offering competitive broadband services on their HFC networks   which are capable of offering 100 mbps broadband to around 2.7 million   homes and can do so right now – not in eight years time and at a cost   which is a tiny fraction of FTTH" (<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/nbn-is-financially-viable-says-optus/story-e6frg9hx-1225938048763" target="_blank">view speech</a>). James Massola, on the other hand, has an article in today's Australian noting claims by Optus that the NBN is financially viable (but with not real focus on potential competition issues) (<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/industry-sectors/nbn-is-financially-viable-says-optus/story-e6frg9hx-1225938048763" target="_blank">view article</a>). Economist, Prof Joshua Gans, provides his own thoughts on the issue <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=6310" target="_blank">here</a>, including relevant competition issues.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:12:26 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E1F7894A-4FC8-4743-A9C4-89980F4B64F9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises Queensland liquor accord</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Conditional authorisation has been granted for a pro-forma liquor accord arrangement proposed by the Queensland Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation. The ACCC indicated that it considered "that the measures proposed are likely to assist in efforts to reduce   violence and other alcohol-related harms in and around drinking venues   in Queensland". While they are likely to have some effect on price and consumer choice, these are likely to be limited. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/950545" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/925015" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:51:21 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1310D0E8-4C06-4B55-BD25-B5EAE09A6834</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny authorisation for exclusive pilotage agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a 'draft determination proposing to deny authorisation for an exclusive pilotage services agreement at the Port of Brisbane' which would require Maritime Safety Queensland to acquire all pilotage services at the port from Brisbane Marine Pilots. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/950524" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/932622" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:19:23 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ABE3BC20-9830-4976-BF78-C7430204F7ED</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC consults on GrainCorp's proposed wheat port access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has begun consultation on GrainCorp's proposed wheat port access arrangements for October 2011-September 2014. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:18:39 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50D99A33-3595-4FA1-8FCD-423320EFA26D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows small liquor retailers to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has authorised Liquor Stax Australia to collectively bargain with wholesale suppliers on behalf of around 200 small businesses. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/950394" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/935905" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:51:02 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7CEE2F69-EA75-4AC9-8DE4-D29FDAD3185D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Competition in the banking sector</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Treasurer Wayne Swan spoke with ABC Radio's Sabra Lane this morning about competition in the banking sector, stating, in part, that: 'what we've put in place is a series of effective measures to increase competition in the banking sector and one of the sad consequences of the Global Financial Crisis is that it did restrict competition in the banking sector; it did strengthen the big four.... we remain ready to take on board other measures should they be necessary to ensure greater competition in the banking sector.' <a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=transcripts/2010/104.htm&pageID=004&min=wms&Year=&DocType" target="_blank">View transcript</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:17:31 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8802D97E-0B23-4A67-86B3-66C2A334D544</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transparency and mergers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Stephen King has provided his thoughts on an item in Friday's AFR in which John Kench argued for more transparency in the merger process. View <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=6283" target="_blank">blog piece</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:43:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">98E45A1F-C63E-4E87-918C-6C765194139B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows continuation of SA oyster research levy</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a final determination granting authorisation to the South Australian Oyster Growers Association and five oyster hatcheries to continue collecting a levy from SA oyster growers. Levy funds are used for research and development, which the ACCC accepts may benefit consumers through the production of higher quality oysters. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949834" target="_blank">press release</a>. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/929177" target="_blank"> authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:43:04 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9CA0DAD2-79F5-4521-A267-144D7509603B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to approve collective bargaining by Wiggans Island coal producers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft decision proposing to allow coal producers to collectively bargain with QR Network for access to its Moura and Blackwater rail systems; access is necessary to transport coal to the new Wiggins Island Coal Export Terminal. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949776" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/937335" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:41:45 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8E6B2AF4-09C4-44CA-8073-1EF854F99D59</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC Chairman speaks of 'merger myths'</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, today spoke about seven merger 'myths' he claims have developed in relation to the ACCC's merger review process. His speech was part of the Merger Market's event in Sydney - see ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949595" target="_blank">press release</a>, 'ACCC chief busts merger myths'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949616/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">full speech</a>. See also article by Angus Whiteley and Jo Schneider in Bloomberg: '<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-30/samuel-rejects-merger-myths-hounding-australia-s-competition-watchdog.html" target="_blank">Merger "Myths" Leave Top Australian Watchdog Graeme Samuel Bewildered</a>', which quote Samuel refering to claims (by some) that recent bank mergers have diminished competition as 'superficial nonsense' which beggar belief.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:12:52 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89E8A566-4524-466C-80DE-239855B1FC47</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed tobacco acquisition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Swedish Match AB by Scandinavian Tobacco Group, following resolution of competition concerns by way of a court enforceable undertaking. The undertaking will see Scandinavian Tobacco group selling certain Australian cigar assets to an independent purchaser. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949642" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949609" target="_blank">merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:12:23 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7B5F5EA3-0188-4866-800A-BBB959856C07</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow port truck access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is proposing to allow DP World Australia Ltd and Patrick Stevedores to give preferential treatment of truck carriers engaging in dual runs at the Port of Fremantle. ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, stated that "the ACCC accepts that the proposed arrangement is likely to result in an   increase in the efficiency of the Port of Fremantle and a reduction in   the number of trucks moving to and from the port, to the benefit of the   surrounding community and the environment" while producing limited public detriments. It is proposed that authorisation be granted for five years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949633" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/936500" target="_blank">draft determination</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:11:53 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CE1F6A80-0909-41A3-B2DA-D49CB3124DC7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts court enforceable undertakings from ResMed Asia Pacific Ltd over RPM concerns</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has accepted court enforceable undertakings from ResMed Asia Pacific Ltd over concerns that it engaged in resale price maintenance.  The alleged RPM conduct involved ResMed making it known to its Accredited Partners that it would not supply to them unless they agreed not to advertise ResMed products at less than a price specified by ResMed. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/949083" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/948522" target="_blank">Undertaking</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:20:58 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1534C956-4DF1-46D1-9395-219BA2FE43DA</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cabcharge penalised for misuse of market power</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court (Justice Finkelstein) has made declarations that Cabcharge contravened s 46 of the TPA (misuse of market power) on three occasions and ordered that Cabcharge pay penalties totalling $14 million plus $1 million toward the ACCC's costs. The penalties were agreed in advance and endorsed by the court. Cabcharge was also ordered to comply with a compliance program and will be subject to external audits. The contraventions involved refusals to deal and the supply of taxi meters and fare schedule updates below cost (predatory pricing) between 2004-2007. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/948779" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:52:07 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4551A6F8-90B1-4A4F-B83C-D0018E48FB32</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval to Virgin Blue-Etihad alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted an <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944483" target="_blank">interim authorisation</a> in relation to a joint pricing and scheduling services cooperation agreement between VIrgin Blue and Etihad. ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, noted that the ACCC had ' taken into account the fact that Virgin Blue and Etihad currently do   not operate any competing services, as well as the lead time required to   market and sell tickets before the commencement of long-haul services' (which was not the case in respect of the recently denied authorisation for a proposed alliance between Virgin Blue and Air New Zealand). View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/948511" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:43:27 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C1285ED1-B8B7-4903-838B-304666DEA868</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC re-authorises collective negotiations by Premium dairy farmer members</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[he ACCC has <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/934203" target="_blank">re-authorised</a> - for 10 years - collective negotiations by Premium Milk on behalf of its dairy farmer members with Parmalat. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/948441" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:43:15 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0BD5A4F3-5983-4F1E-A94B-E2A1BC3E9951</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed acquisition of Franklins by Metcash</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/935704" target="_blank">statement of issues</a> on this proposed acquisition. Submissions are due by 15 October; the ACCC's decision will be released by 11 November 2010. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/948426" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:42:42 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">932B419A-A5E2-4989-AE60-87687982FDD7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC objects to Sydney Airport's proposed increase in charges for regional airlines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has objected to Sydney Airport Co Ltd's proposal to increase charges for regional airlines serving passengers within NSW. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/947582" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:49:43 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62698003-7610-47DA-9367-95AE0F66C263</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC released draft report and draft indicative prices to apply to fixed line telco services</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The release of the draft report and draft indicative prices follows a period of industry consultation that commended on 3 December 2009. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/947485" target="_blank">press release and draft report</a>. Submissions on the draft report are due by 22 October.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:47:56 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51FB5B4C-34B5-4B19-A3C2-8C9E077984D1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK OFT/CC release joint merger guidelines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[he UK's Office of Fair Trading and Competition Commission have, for the first time, released joint merger assessment guidelines. These Guidelines replace the following guidelines: Mergers—substantive assessment guidance (OFT516), Guidance note revising Mergers —substantive assessment guidance (OFT516a), Restatement of OFT’s position regarding acquisitions of ‘failing firms’ (OFT1047) and Merger References: Competition Commission Guidelines, CC2. View <a href="http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/press_rel/2010/sep/pdf/34-10_oft-cc_merger_guidelines.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a> (PDF). View <a href="http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/about_us/our_organisation/workstreams/analysis/pdf/100916_merger_assessment_guidelines.pdf" target="_blank">guidelines</a> (PDF).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:16:32 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3C3B87CC-A7B9-4B54-8F11-C30A0EE4D5FF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC consults on revised Hunter Valley rail access arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is consulting on a revised Hunter Valley rail network access undertaking submitted by Australian Rail Track Corporation. Submissions are due by 11 October. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/947297" target="_blank">press release and undertaking</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:45:04 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">369B1522-BF06-4042-8CB6-235F57A895DF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants authorisation to Suncorp-Metway and Bendigo and Adelaide Bank ATM fee free arrangements</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authorisation to an agreement between Suncorp-Metway and Bendigo and Adelaide Bank not to charge each other's cardholders a fee for transactions at ATMs they own.  The ACCC believes the agreement 'will be pro-competitive, assisting to ensure that they are not at a competitive disadvantage to institutions with larger ATM networks'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/946743" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/931232" target="_blank">authorisation</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:37:31 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">FB8559D7-A8C6-4B55-8CB5-5F3839497C5C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC accepts court enforceable undertaking from OzTAM, Seven, Nine and Ten</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from OzTAM Pty Limited and its shareholders, Seven Network (Operations) Limited, Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd and Network Ten Pty Limited, which addresses concerns that "OzTAM's structure and operation had the potential to facilitate anti-competitive conduct". View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/946791" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/946688" target="_blank">undertaking</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:36:53 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B6C57A77-A5F4-457F-80BD-7586231E213F</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No new Minister for Competition</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, today announced the new Ministry. Former competition minister, Dr Craig Emerson moves into the Cabinet as Minister for Trade; there is now no Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs. Instead, responsibility has been merged into Treasurer Wayne Swan's portfolio, assisted by new Parliamentary Secretary for Treasury, David Bradbury MP. View <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/happy-with-the-shape-of-pms-cabinet-no-minister-20100913-159ai.html" target="_blank">Age piece</a> on the removal of a specialist minister.  The Shadow Minister for Small Business, Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs remains Bruce Billson MP.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:01:49 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BB341892-B55B-412A-9A45-688928AEA55D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC opposes Air New Zealand/Virgin Blue Alliance</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has denied clearance of a proposed alliance between Air New Zealand and Virgin Blue, who they consider to be 'significant' competitors.View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/946438" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>.  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-09/virgin-blue-air-nz-alliance-should-be-denied-australian-regulator-says.html" target="_blank">View news item</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:38:03 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">37A9B62F-A84E-45C1-9185-CB38ECC5F87C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC continues to oppose NAB acquisition of AXA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has denied informal clearance of NAB's proposed acquisition of AXA, despite revised understakings being offered. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/946139" target="_blank">press release.</a>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:38:44 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1B7C2F7D-03CD-4EF2-92E5-FDFECF496E90</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval for joint green waste tender</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has 'has granted interim authorisation to allow the Central Queensland Local Government Association to run a joint tender process on behalf of the Banana Shire Council, Central Highlands Regional Council, Gladstone Regional Council, Isaac Regional Council and the Rockhampton Regional Council to provide green waste mulching services in their council regions'. Submissions on the substantive application for authorisation are due by 10 September. See<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/945074" target="_blank"> press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:03:11 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A670DA6C-A98D-4576-AE66-1DADA08AA641</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC allows Jetset Travelworld/Stella Travel Services Merger</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Stella Travel Services by Jetset Travelworld Ltd. This decision followed release of a statement of issues and extensive review of the transaction. The ACCC noted, in particular, that the internet has 'dramatically affected th way competition works in the travel industry'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944453" target="_blank">Press Release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:13:43 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">706C4C05-4255-4E9F-88B6-9F9186EF5C37</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baxter Healthcare penalised for TPA breaches</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Justice Mansfield has ordered Baxter Healthcare to pay a penalty of $4.9million for contravening sections 46 (misuse of market power) and 47 (exclusive dealing) of the Trade Practices Act. This penalty ruling follows the 2008 ruling of the court declaring that the contraventions had occurred. The penalty is substantially less than the $27.3m sum sought by the ACCC. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944368" target="_blank">ACCC Press Release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:08:46 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40C7921E-C89F-4E84-9913-B9D210B6690D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chief Justice of the Federal Court thinks BHP v Qld Wire was wrongly decided</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[At last week's Law Council seminar on the Gold Coast the newly appointed (March 2010) Chief Justice of the Federal Court, Pat Keane, stated that he disagreed with the 1989 High Court decision in Qld Wire in which BHP was found to have abused its power by refusing to supply y-bar to a competitor of its subsidiary, QIW. Keane was, at the time, junior counsel for BHP. View <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/woolworths-on-track-as-coles-catches-up/story-e6frg8zx-1225910639675" target="_blank">brief report</a> by John Durie in the Australian.  See also article by James Eyers, 'Keane's Lament for Cases Lost' in Friday's Australian Financial Review (page 39) in which Justice Keane is quoted as saying: 'It may be that the decision in QWI should now be seen as a relic of times when legal and legal/economic theories derived from US jurisprudence exercised undue sway over the thinking of members of the High Court'..]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:24:36 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57019B29-4164-4BC7-AAA0-7E5BDA2F400D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v Link Solutions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 919</title>
      <link>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/919.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This case involves an allegation of third line forcing by telecommunications companies. The pleadings against EFS and CIT were struck out and orders made for summary judgment in their favour. Clear Telecoms and WorldTel officers were held not to be entitled to summary judgment.The ACCC sought (and was granted) leave to replead. <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/919.html" target="_blank"></a>The matter was stood over until 30 August to consider proposed orders. <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/919.html" target="_blank">View decision</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:21:23 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ED530519-E427-4A45-96FC-88F1E1E6A106</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Publication: Changes in Competition Policy Over the Last Two Decades</title>
      <link>http://www.uokik.gov.pl/publications.php#faq1002</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On 25 May the Polish Office of Competition and Consumer Protection <a href="http://www.uokik.gov.pl/news.php?news_id=2082&news_page=1" target="_blank">announced</a> the release of a book - '<a href="http://www.uokik.gov.pl/publications.php#faq1002" target="_blank">Changes in Competition Policy Over the Last Two Decades</a>'.  The book (which is just shy of 600 pages long) is freely available for download on the Agency's website and was released as the 'jubilee publication' celebrating the 20th Anniverry of the establishment of the UOKiK. It features a number of papers by authors from various jurisdictions divided into four broad areas: Competition-Restricting Practices, Merger Control, State Aid Reform and Competition Policy Challenges.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:43:20 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4B8D80FC-638D-4310-AA2D-87E9B10109A7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Graeme Samuel's opening remarks to the Trade Practices Committee Workshop</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Graeme Samuel's opening remarks at the LCA's Trade Practices Committee Workshop on the Gold Coast on 21 August are now available <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944012" target="_blank">here</a>. The provide an uptate on trade practices issues with particular focus on cartel conduct. A paper by ACCC Commissioner, Dr Jill Walker is also available: '<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/944183/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">The meaning of understanding: when does communication become collusion?</a>']]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:16:56 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2D359B20-F6A2-46DF-8C03-8273823B11C6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow Agsafe to continue industry stewardship program</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to grant further authorisation to Agsafe to allow it to 'continue to enforce the Agsafe Accreditation and Training Program' ensuring 'regulatory compliance with the supply chain of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in Australia'. The ACCC believes the authorisation will help maintain safety levels. Submissions on the draft determination may be made until 1 September. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/943418" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml?itemId=931489" target="_blank">draft determination</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:24:03 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1DFA9028-32F7-47F8-8288-4E9251311B9A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US agencies release new merger guidelines</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The US Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice today announced the release of new merger guidelines. These replace the 1992 merger guidelines and follow the release of a<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/hmgrevisedguides/index.shtm" target="_blank"> draft revised guideline</a> in April this year. <a href="http://ftc.gov/opa/2010/08/hmg.shtm" target="_blank">View press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg-2010.html" target="_blank">Guidelines</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:31:13 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">457E0995-BC51-4D53-B71C-F0E38FBDA30B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC revokes speedway notification</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has revoked an exclusive dealing notification lodged by Perth Motorplex and Avalon Raceway 'which only allow drivers and pit crew to access track facilities if they hold a licence from the National Association of Speedway Racing.'  The notification was originally lodged in 2008.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/943212" target="_blank">Press Release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/810857" target="_blank">notification register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:36:32 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">682C69B0-A233-4DAA-A7E8-59378EEBB022</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise collective negotiation arrangements for dairy farmers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft decision to re-authorise collective negotiation arrangements proposed by Premium Mil Ltd on behalf of its members relating to farm gate milk prices and milk standards when dealing with Parmalat Australia Ltd. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/943035" target="_blank">Press Release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/934203" target="_blank">Authorisation Register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:23:35 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A1628631-EDB0-44C1-A0CA-18636CFBC5D7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel recuses from NAB/AXA merger decision</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[To avoid an perceived conflict arising from a family investment in DFO, Samuel has recused himself from ACCC's deliberations on the proposed NAB/AXA merger. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/942967" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/941513/fromItemId/750991" target="_blank">mergers register</a>; the closing date for public submissions on the proposed merger is 23 August 2010.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:22:44 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A1D2E0EA-80DE-483E-ADC5-409DC2CB333E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Which party has the best competition policy?</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[With the election campaign gearing up for next weekend's vote, I thought I'd take a little time to evaluate which major party has the best competition policy.  The evaluation is not simple, given the lack of detailed discussion of future competition policy by either party, but the conclusion is not surprising. View <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/which-party-for-competition/" target="_blank">blog post</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:32:58 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">214C0901-3B1F-400B-8153-50446D40BC70</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Melbourne University launches Competition Law and Economics Network</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Melbourne University today launched the hosted the Competition Law & Economics Network. The launch coincided with the first annual Baxt Lecture in Competition Law, delivered by Prof William Kovacic. See my related <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/melbourne-launches-clen/" target="_blank">blog post</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:47:19 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">79C241FF-15BF-4EF3-9A48-F45154FA7902</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Annual Baxt Lecture in Competition Law</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Melbourne University today hosted the <a href="http://clen.law.unimelb.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=C442D00C-5056-B405-5172878F823DC17A&DiaryID=4825" target="_blank">first annual Baxt Lecture in Competition Law</a> (co-sponsored by the <a href="http://www.anzsog.edu.au/" target="_blank">ANZSOG</a>). The lecture was presented by Professor William Kovacic, former Chairman of the US FTC, on the topic 'Competition Authorities for the 21st Century'. The lecture will serve as the flagship event for the new Competition Law & Economics Network. See my related <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/melbourne-launches-clen/" target="_blank">blog post</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:46:37 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C079C62C-EA66-4BA8-AD4D-97D1B68D5762</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft decision to authorise Queensland liquor accord</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft decision to grant conditional authorisation for a pro-forma liquor accord arrangement in Queensland which aims to deal with harm resulting from alcohol abuse. View<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/942285" target="_blank"> press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/925015" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:22:18 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D02BE011-CA8B-4E68-85C9-3FA32AC974FE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC takes action against Black and White Cabs</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has instituted proceedings against Black and White Cabs, alleging third line forcing. t is alleged that in 2009 Black and White Cabs included a 'clause in a number of operating agreements which required the taxi operators who sub-let a licence through Black and White Cabs to exclusively use the Cabcharge Eftpos System for processing electronic payments'. The matter is listed for a scheduling conference in Melbourne on 22 September. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/941717" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:40:15 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">DDE8E6EB-110A-4C63-8591-1AD9366981A7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise ATM proposal</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is proposing to authorise an agreement between Suncorp-Metway and Bendigo and Adelaide Bank not to charge each tohers' cardholders a fee for ATM transactions that they own. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/940211" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/931232" target="_blank">authorisation register</a> for draft determination.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:12:31 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36360915-3A22-45A5-9D2D-57B318A34027</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose Novartis pharmaceutical acquisition</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of Alcon Laboratories by Novartis, following the provision of undertakings which will see 'injectable miotic assets' in Australia sold to Bausch & Lomb. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/940204" target="_blank">press release</a>. View mergers <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/940159" target="_blank">register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:09:27 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A4E95C73-8EB6-48F2-A2E5-FCF115B62425</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telstra penalised $18.55 million</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                Justice Middleton has penalised Telstra $18.55 million for denying infrastructure access to competitors, indicating that the contraventions 'demonstrate substantial non-compliance by Telstra with its legal obligations'. Telstra has indicated that it will not appeal. View <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/790.html" target="_blank">Federal Court decision</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/939835" target="_blank">ACCC press release</a>. See also news articles, including '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/telecommunications/telstra-fined-19m-for-blocking-wholesale-rivals/story-fn4iyzsr-1225897956936" target="_blank">Telstra fined $19m for blocking wholesale rivals</a>' (Bingemann, The Australian), '<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/telstra-to-be-focused-for-the-first-time-20100728-10w8a.html" target="_blank">Telstra to be focused, for the first time</a>' (Maiden, SMH), '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/telstra-up-to-its-old-tricks-again/story-e6frg9io-1225898192922" target="_blank">Telstra up to its old tricks again</a>' (Durie, The Australian), '<a href="http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201007/28/telstra_fine_for_breaching_competition_laws_has_lessons_for_all.page" target="_blank">Telstra fine for breaching competition laws has lessons for all</a>' (Clayton Utz) and '<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/07/28/2966295.htm?section=justin" target="_blank">Telstra fined $18.5m for anti-competitive behaviour</a>' (Donovan, ABC).
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:59:17 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">05BC400E-E5F4-48EC-A99A-D5E4D3F09EAE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim approval to Liquor Stax to collectively bargain</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted interim approval to Liquor Stax to collectively bargain for around 2000 small businesses with around 60 suppliers of alcohol, cigarettes, poker machines and confectionary and related services. Submissions have been sought from interested parties - submissions close on 30 July. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/939888" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/935905" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:58:38 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C5029398-F7D3-49FB-B377-4C5F6757ABCB</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC does not propose to intervene in sale of Mobil retail assets to 7-Eleven</title>
      <link>http://www.australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it does not intend to intervene in the proposed sale, conditional on certain divestiture undertakings.  VIew <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/938968" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/938966" target="_blank">Merger Register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:58:05 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9123DF06-13DA-499A-B903-A6B80CFA30AF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC objects to car rental collective bargaining at Perth Airport</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has objected to a proposal by five car rental companies to collectively negotiate with Perth Airport, claiming it may 'reduce competitive tensions between the car rental companies' and put other car rental companies at a competitive disadvantage. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/938151" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:39:39 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6EC21554-275C-46BC-807E-8F7EB77D6A38</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wright Rubber v Bayer - appeal allowed</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Full Federal Court has granted an application for leave to appeal and allowed that appeal in respect to the striking out of certain pleadings relating to the applicant's representative proceeding against Bayer alleging price-fixing. <a href="http://www.austlii.com/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2010/85.html" target="_blank">View case</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:38:56 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">90A4DD1F-BD1B-4C60-B930-1034A401104E</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access bill receives assent</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2010access.html">Trade Practices Amendment (Infrastructure Access) Act 2010</a> was assented to on 13 July, making changes to administrative aspects of the regime.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:57:49 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87979723-13EB-4C39-8506-ED2D202CB949</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TPA name change legislation receives Assent</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2010acl.html" target="_blank">Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010</a> was assented to on 13 July with the result that the TPA will be renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 from 1 January 2011.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:28:50 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E0D9899A-F6F3-485A-9EB6-C2FE1EB750E0</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise North West Shelf Gas Project joint marketing</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC is proposing to 'grant conditional authorisation to the joint venture partners in the North West Shelf Gas Project to jointly market and sell their individual domestic gas entitlements for supply in Western Australia' until 31 December 2015.  The ACCC is now consulting on the draft determinations and submissions are due on 30 July 2010. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/937039" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/922104/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">Authorisation Register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:23:51 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B46A8EB2-68AE-4AE1-84CB-8B7805EAD435</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TPA to become CCA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Today's passage of the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:%22legislation/billhome/r4335%22" target="_blank">Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Bill (No. 2) 2010</a> means that the TPA will be renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 from 1 January 2011.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:51:42 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">BBF4D417-CD4B-4253-8DFB-8E28CB8515BD</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v Bridgestone Corporation</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The full text of the <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/584.html" target="_blank">Judgment of Justice Finkelstein</a> in this case involving admissions and agreed penalties for cartel conduct is now available and worth a look. Justice Finkelstein compares penalties in other jurisdictions and is critical of the low penalties applied (to date) in Australia.  View <a href="http://competitionlaw.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/accc-v-bridgestone-corporation/" target="_blank">my blog post</a> on this.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:51:51 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2DF962B3-B26C-4032-BA8B-F22D8BA2F002</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Speech - Current Issues on the ACCC's Radar</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman Graeme Samuel's paper from the weekend's Competition Law Conference in Sydney is now available on the ACCC website.<a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/930680/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank"> View paper</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:17:51 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">473DA15E-DD3E-4A74-8D16-57FEFBCE14E2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creeping Acquisition Bill Introduced</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Parliament today introduced the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r4376_first/toc_pdf/10113b01.pdf;fileType%3Dapplication%2Fpdf" target="_blank">Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2010</a> which will make minor changes to the merger provisions which the Government, in the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/ems/r4376_ems_f6eee4a7-3f20-4594-8810-6f4ce9d4ee2b/upload_pdf/343127.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf" target="_blank">Explanatory Memorandum</a>, claims will help to address concerns about creeping acquisitions.  View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/legislation/2010ccla.html">my summary here</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:33:22 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">C9960B8F-2346-4A8F-AC72-023EA1B28162</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Telstra seeks fine reduction</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Telstra has requested a fine of $4m for excluding the broadband servers of some competitors for a period in excess of two years. The ACCC is seeking a $40m fine. Telstra claims the amount should be significantly less than what the ACCC is seeking because it's conduct was accidental and resulted from poor supervision rather than as a result of a deliberate anticompetitive policy. The case is currently before Justice Middleton in the Federal Court (Melbourne). See reports in <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/telstra-inclined-to-cop-4m-accc-fine-20100526-we9j.html" target="_blank">The Age</a> and the <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/telstra-wants-40m-penalty-reduced-to-4m-20100526-we8v.html" target="_blank">Sydney Morning Herald</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:16:51 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D2220E77-2B5C-4C54-91F1-49C3A779D64C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Supreme Court overturns decision in American Needle</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The US Supreme Court had overturned the decision of Seventh Circuit Court in <em>American Needle</em>. The case stemmed from an agreement by the National Football League Properties (NFLP), an entity formed by the NFL (an unincorporated association of 32 football teams), to grant an exclusive licence to Reebok to produce and sell trademarked headware for all of the teams. Each of the football teams owned its own name, colors, trademarks etc. The Court found that just because members were controlled by a single entity did not mean they necessarily escaped the scope of s 1 of the Sherman Act - they considered the issue one of 'substance' not 'form' and in this case and asked whether the agreement joined together 'separate economic actors pursuing separate economic interests' such that it 'deprive[d] the marketplace of independent centers of decisionmaking'. The Court found that each NFL team was a substantial independently owned and managed business whose 'general corporate actions are guided or determined [by] separate corporate consciousnesses'. They also observed that the teams compete with each other on and off the playing field. Importantly, the Court held that they were potentially competing suppliers for intellectual property. Consequently they held that the NFLP's decisions to licence the teams' separately owned intellectual property constituted concerted activity covered by section 1 of the Sherman Act. The decision was unanimous. <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-661.pdf" target="_blank">View decision</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 08:06:30 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F9848F0C-94E8-4F5F-B0CA-10D10612A9D4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hockey announces Liberal plan to review TPA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Joe Hockey announced as part of his Budget Address to the National Press Club that, if elected, the Coalition would undertake a 'comprehensive and independent review of the Trade Practices Act ... including all aspects of competition arrangements in Australia.' We can expect to hear more about this from Bruce Billson in the coming days. View <a href="http://www.liberal.org.au/Latest-News/2010/05/19/~/media/Files/HOCKEY PRESS CLUB Speech 19 May 10.ashx" target="_blank">Hockey's address</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:57:16 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1E3082BF-1BF0-4880-879D-73B754879E7D</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC institutes proceedings against Japan Airlines alleging price fixing of air freight</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Japan Airlines today became the 14th airline subject to ACCC proceedings alleging price fixing in the air cargo industry.  A directions hearing has been set for 10 June. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/928666" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 13:57:11 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">FFAFFEB6-D6E4-4EB8-8688-58743083A871</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC institutes proceedings against Air New Zealand alleging price fixing</title>
      <link>http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/928664</link>
      <description>The next claim by the ACCC in a long line of proceedings instituted in respect of air cargo is against Air NZ, alleging that between 2002 and 2006 Air New Zealand 'entered into arrangements or understandings with other international air cargo carriers that had the purpose or effect of fixing the price of a fuel surcharge and a security surcharge that were applied to air cargo carried by them and other airlines'. A directions hearing has been set for 10 June.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:55:57 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">033182CE-9108-4683-B095-2FCAF215DBAE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senate Economics Committee recommends rejection of Richmond Amendment to merger laws</title>
      <link>http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/economics_ctte/richmond_amendment_09/report/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The majority of the Senate Economics Legislation Committee recommended that the Senate reject the <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A"legislation/billhome/s740"" target="_blank">Trade Practices Amendment (Material Lessening of Competition - Richmond Amendment) Bill 2009</a>, finding alteration of the merger test would generate uncertainty when there was no sound evidence suggesting a problem with the current bill. The Committee also rejected the proposal to set a percentage market share threshold for mergers involving firms with an existing substantial market share - the so-called 'creeping acquisition' provision - noting that such a change would be 'arbitrary and contentious'. View <a href="http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/reports/2009richmond.html">report information</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 12:43:23 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B7A37697-19A7-4897-9098-AFF5A889D070</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Professions and the TPA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The ACCC has launched a new publication, <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/926503" target="_blank">Professions and the TPA</a>.              </p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:31:07 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">70F4A326-4392-4BE9-86C4-5FF8CA52030C</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC continues to allow collective bargaining for chicken growers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has re-authorised collective bargaining by Victorian chicken growes for a further five years. <br />
<br />
View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/924751" target="_blank">press release</a>. <br />
<br />
View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/915491" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:18:31 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00474551-9D2D-49E8-B534-28048FD7CFA9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises arrangements to close coal terminal at Gladstone Port</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has authorised arrangements for the transfer coal handling capacity which would facilitate the closure of Barney Point at Gladstone. <br />
<br />
View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/924715" target="_blank">press release</a>. <br />
<br />
View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/908521" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:16:59 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26D75E02-D09C-4EC0-9E77-23B6448E0228</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow freelance journalists to collectively negotiate with publishers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft determination proposing to authorise Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance to collectively negotiate on behalf of freelance journalists. <br />
<br />
See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/924714" target="_blank">press release</a>. <br />
<br />
See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/924714" target="_blank">authorisation register</a>, including <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D10+3542199.pdf&trimFileTitle=D10+3542199.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=924767" target="_blank">draft authorisation</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:12:53 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">047449C8-41DA-4E75-A362-85FA79A9C545</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More news on ACCC opposition to NAB bid for Axa</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
                The NAB has rejected the ACCC's opposition to its bid for Axa Asia Pacific and has indicated it will pursue a 'range of options' to move ahead with the bid. This has led to a flurry of interesting news items - there's pleny on offer, so I've just included links to a small selection: <br /><br />

Scott Murdoch, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/city-beat/nab-to-defy-accc-on-axa/story-fn4xq4cj-1225856138119" target="_blank">
NAB to Defy ACCC on AXA</a>' (The Australian, 21 April)<br />
David Rogers, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/investors-cautious-after-corporate-regulator-blocks-nab/story-e6frg8zx-1225856145008" target="_blank">Investors Cautious after NAB blocked</a>' (The Australian, 21 April)<br />
Tim Boreham, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/bank-licks-wounds-after-watchdog-bites/story-e6frg9lo-1225856145253" target="_blank">Bank licks wounds after watchdog bite</a>' (The Australian, 21 April)<br />
Ben Butler, '<a href="http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/nab-hints-at-legal-action-against-corporate-regulator/story-e6frede3-1225856307139" target="_blank">NAB Hints at Legal Action Against Corporate Regulator</a>' (Herald Sun, 21 April)<br />
George Lekakis, '<a href="http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/watchdog-thwarts-nab-on-axa-takeover/story-e6frede3-1225855871471" target="_blank">Watchdog thwarts NAB on Axa takeover</a>'  (Herald Sun, 21 April) <br />
John Durie, '<a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/accc-changes-its-tune-john-durie/story-e6frg9io-1225855926706" target="_blank">ACCC changes its tune</a>' (The Australian, 20 April).
            ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:07:47 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20F57158-A2A3-406C-9EC0-E65D8C8A31BC</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proposed US Merger Guidelines released for public comment</title>
      <link>http://www.ftc.gov/bc/workshops/hmg/index.shtml</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The US has released proposed merger guidelines for public comment.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/04/hmg.shtm target="_blank">View press release.</a>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:32:35 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">948EE38C-AD0F-4A74-9B59-21843466E670</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$9 million in penalties for air conditioning cartel</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court has imposed $9.2m in penalties over a Western Australian air conditioning cartel case involving bid-rigging and price fixing for the supply of commercial and industrial air conditioning and mechanical services. Proceedings were brought against 17 companies and 22 individuals. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/924637" target="_blank">press release</a>. View decision of Justice Gilmour: <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/348.html" target="_blank">ACCC v Admiral Mechanical Services Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 348</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:43:44 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7D40C1DF-C2BC-4D02-9158-D85FF708E4CD</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose NAB's bid for AXA, but not AMP's bid</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC will oppose NAB's proposed acquisition of AXA Asia Pacitic holdings, but will not oppose AMP's proposed acquisition of AXA. The ACCC expressed the view that a merger between NAB and AXA 'would result in a substantial lessening of competition in the market for retail investment platforms for investors with complex investment needs'. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/924351" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/publiccompetitionassessments/" target="_blank">public competition assessment register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:10:05 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E56A7249-8FBF-4C2F-BB8A-ACCAF0D1C737</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$8 million + marine hose penalty penalty for cartel conduct</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Federal Court has ordered four suppliers of marine hose to pay penalties in excess of $8.24 million for cartel conduct (in the form of bid rigging) between 2001-2006. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/923519" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:42:41 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F7847FFC-9FA8-412A-A23C-B00E27BACAE6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC institutes proceedings against Malaysian airline companies for alleged price fixing of air freight</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has instituted proceedings against Malaysian Airline System Berhad and Malaysia Airlines Cargo Sdn BhD (a wholly wned subsidiary). This is the 13th airline that has been subjected to ACCC proceedings arising out of price fixing allegations in the air cargo industry.  View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/923374" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:35:39 +1000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D28964DF-216C-4489-A241-454DA638FC45</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC authorises continued operation of Qantas/British Airways' Joint Services Agreement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted authorisation of Qantas and British Airways' Joint Services Agreement for a further five years. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/899538/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank" >authorisation register</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/921428" target="_blank" >press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:18:40 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A5DF23B6-E110-4B44-84AC-36C6A429E0CD</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose proposed acquisition of Goodman Fielder's edible fats and oils business by Cargill Australia</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced it will oppose the proposed acquisition of Goodman Fielder's edible fats and oils business by Cargill Australia, with Chairman Graeme Samuel noting that the proposed acquisition 'would lead to a significant concentration of refining assets in Australia and remove one of only a small number of competing refiners that offer a wide range of fats and oils products' and that this 'would likely result in a substantial lessening of competition in markets for the supply of certain refined oil products'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/921341" target="_blank" >full press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/921353" target="_blank" >mergers register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:01:28 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9A649C3B-03F5-486D-9E9B-5482E32B4387</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC will not oppose proposed acquisition of Varian by Agilent after modification</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has announced that it will not oppose proposed acquisition of Varian by Agilent 'after competition concerns were resolved by Agilent's undertaking to sell certain global scientific instrument assets'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/921342" target="_blank" >press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/921343" target="_blank" >mergers register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:00:16 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">D0E2C470-A334-4A00-BCE9-72D13E8BE2FE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 294</title>
      <link>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/294.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Justice Dowsett handed down his decision in <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/294.html" target="_blank" >ACCC v Cement Australia Pty Ltd</a> today. The meaning of market under ss 45, 46 and 47 of the TPA is discussed.&nbsp;&nbsp;The judgment begins: "Most competition cases are complex.&nbsp;&nbsp;This case is no exception."&nbsp;&nbsp;This judgment sets out the markets alleged in pleadings but ultimately relates only to amendments of pleadings and attribution of costs related to late amendment to pleadings.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:33:44 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2793C8F8-BE0C-4231-9B90-823F9AA7D200</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to deny authorisation to NSW electricity co-insurance arrangement</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC today released a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D10+3397473.pdf&trimFileTitle=D10+3397473.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=920684" target="_blank" >draft decision</a> 'proposing to deny authorisation to the NSW Government-owned electricity generators and the future acquirers of the Gentrader bundles to join and use a joint risk management arrangement'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920660" target="_blank" >press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/904369" target="_blank" >authorisation register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:25:22 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7C5E5C75-27B9-4DF9-8DB0-2E272490ED10</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC calls for comment on proposed BHP Billiton/Rio Tinto joint venture</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/trimFile.phtml?trimFileName=D10+3397775.pdf&trimFileTitle=D10+3397775.pdf&trimFileFromVersionId=920561" target="_blank" >Statement of Issues</a> on the proposed BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto joint venture to produce iron ore in WA. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920560" target="_blank" >press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/876260" target="_blank" >Merger register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:35:12 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">321A9CDC-FF2D-415F-BD05-BB8B5606FDBD</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tasmanian vegetable growers allowed to collectively negotiate</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has re-authorised collective contract negotations for the Tasmanian Farmers and Graziers Association. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920506" target="_blank">press release</a>. See the <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/902017" target="_blank">ACCC's determination</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:18:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77559C55-7A0E-4E50-A848-529B9F1D4E4A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to allow some limited alcohol supply restrictions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC 'proposes to authorise alcohol supply restrictions in an agreement between liquor licensees in the Casuarina Business Precinct in Darwin'.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/905174" target="_blank">draft decision</a>.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920531" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:18:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86EC54C8-D2A7-4255-A7E7-BBEF3ECFA3ED</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise arrangements to close problem coal terminal at Gladstone Port</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has made a 'draft decision to authorise arrangements to re allocate specified amounts of coal port terminal capacity from Barney Point Coal Terminal at the Port of Gladstone in Central Queensland to either the RG Tanna Coal Terminal or a new terminal to be constructed at the Port.'  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920518" target="_blank">press release</a>.  See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/908521" target="_blank">registry record</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:18:54 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">AA804D9D-6F77-4E16-A369-D7E4AEE64CDF</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC grants interim authorisation for the joint marketing of oil</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has granted 'conditional interim authorisation to Santos and ten other oil producers to jointly market their oil produced in the Surat Basin and Denison Trough in Queensland'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920453" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/916744" target="_blank">registry record</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:18:53 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">B059D724-C53C-4F8D-B09D-4AB05E056E7B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to grant authorisation for collective negotiations for access to essential airport services</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/904461" target="_blank">draft determination</a> 'proposing to grant authorisation to the Board of Airline Representatives of Australia Inc to continue to engage in collective negotiations, on behalf of its member international airlines, for essential airport services'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920366" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:17:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0CA924D7-47AF-41E5-B7AB-7E24DA632ABA</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC to oppose propsed acquisition of Newreg by Link Market Services</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC intends to oppose the proposed acquisition of Newreg by LInk Market Services.  The ACCC claims the acquisition would be likely to substantially lessen competition 'in the national market for securities registration and related services to listed companies and other entities with similar requirements, leading to higher prices and reduced quality of service that shareholders would ultimately bear'. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920350" target="_blank">press release</a>. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920335" target="_blank">public register</a>, including statment of issues.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:17:53 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">E7A82495-AE95-4CB0-B62E-0A7B34829749</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to re-authorise collective bargaining arrangements for Victorian chicken growers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC proposes to re-authorise for five years collective bargaining arrangements put forward by the Victorian Farmers Federation on behalf for Victorian chicken growers. A <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/915491/fromItemId/278039" target="_blank">draft determination</a> has been issued and is open for comment until 9 April. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/920130" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:17:30 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">DBEF196E-0732-4C48-A187-658F8A39D366</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TPA to be renamed CCA</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:"legislation/billhome/r4335"" target="_blank">Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) (No 2) Bill 2009</a> was introduced into the House of Representatives today. Schedule 5, s 2, provides: “Omit “<em>Trade Practices Act 1974</em>“, substitute “<em>Competition and Consumer Act 2010</em>””]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:10:59 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CB058E6A-77FF-4C9C-BCD4-A6BEE4795A4B</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC institutes proceedings against Korean Air Lines Co Ltd</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has instituted proceedings against Korean Air Lines Co Ltd in relation to alleged price fixing in the air cargo industry. Korean Air is the twelfth airline subject to ACCC proceedings in relation to alleged air cargo price fixing. A directions hearing has been set for 1 April 2010. See <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/917336" target="_blank">media release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:10:37 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">928CA2E3-1880-4C39-9105-AD062EE27F5A</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Doctors risk breaching competition laws</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[An ACCC press release provides some details of an ACCC investigation into five doctors from the Kangaroo Island Medical Clinic in South Australia. The doctors shared office and administrative facilities but operated their own separate medical practices and therefore were competitors. The investigation arose from letters written by each doctor to the administrator of the Kangaroo Island hospital relating to on call arrangements and after hours remuneration. The doctors threatened to withdraw services and this conduct was investigated as a collective boycott. Concerns were addressed through the provision of undertakings to the ACCC. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/917301" target="_blank">media release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:09:19 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">F7871629-1208-460B-96FB-17D509EFD5E9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACCC proposes to authorise collective bargaining by iron ore producers</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a draft determination which proposes to grant conditional authorisation to a group of junior iron ore producers to collectively bargain for rail haulage services and rail track acess in Pilbara, WA. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/917137" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/913132" target="_blank">public register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:08:36 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">CD69F797-8D0D-4C5A-BC83-EEC971B44823</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Speech - How competition law supports transport and logistics solutions</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chariman, Graeme Samuel, delivered a paper at the Australian Logistics Council Forum 2010, Sydney, today regarding the benefits of competition in the transport industry. <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/916863/fromItemId/8973" target="_blank">View speech</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:08:07 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">408A082C-7349-4761-AA0D-C5BE98699548</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Restrictive ice hockey policy is anti-competitive</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The ACCC has issued a notice revoking Ice Hockey Australia's exclusive dealing notification, under which members are prevented from playing in ice hockey competitions that do not have Ice Hockey Australia approval. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/916528" target="_blank">press release</a>. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/885256" target="_blank">notification register</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:07:27 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61960E9F-B33D-41C0-B0C9-7EE1438D71D3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Speech by Samuel - Breaching the TPA never been more costly</title>
      <link>http://australiancompetitionlaw.org/news.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, delivered a speech to an AICD luncheon in Melbourne discussing new tougher penalties for anti-competitive behaviour, including cartels. View <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/915872" target="_blank">press release</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:06:56 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">DD3501D4-AD26-49C7-A764-C45CA3826268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>